Manual in Research 2021 (PARTIAL)
Manual in Research 2021 (PARTIAL)
This manual is intended for BS Criminology students of Tanauan Institute, Inc. The content
of this book or any part hereof may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical including copying, recording, storage in any informational
retrieval system, or otherwise without prior permission of the author. Any unauthorized
copying, reproduction, or dissemination of any part of this note shall be prosecuted in
accordance with the law.
Research and thesis writing is one of the requirements for graduation in every
degree program in higher educational institutions. This will showcase the students critical
and logical thinking in the field of interest of criminology program that geared towards the
preparation of those students in their profession someday. This manual on research and
thesis writing with statistics will guide the students in developing their research problem,
research title and as they write the manuscript for presentation.
This manual also set the specific format, guidelines and procedures in conducting
the research to achieve the standards set by the institution. It is also important to students
to know the flow of research, the steps/protocols and the purpose of every portion of their
paper. Through this manual, students will be able to follow uniform format until the
completion of the research. This manual also promote research as one of the aspects of
Criminology profession to as part of social sciences that may solve social problems.
The author expresses his profound gratitude and appreciation to the following:
The Collantes Family and the MANCOM, for their professional support in this
endeavor to attain quality education with quality service;
Dr. Nelia P. Mananguit, the Dean of College and Mam Concepcion E. Baraquio,
the Head of College of Criminology for their guidance that make this manual possible;
To my wife, Maria Racy Alcantara-Magtaan, and Son, Luis Brian who also
support and inspire me to my endeavor and career in teaching;
Above all, to the Almighty God for wisdom and bountiful blessings.
Copyright Page i
Preface ii
Acknowledgment iii
Table of Contents iv
Page |1
VISION
MISSION
COURSE SPECIFICATION
1.0 PHILOSOPHY
This subject is intended to equip the students with the necessary knowledge and
understanding of the basic concepts and principles of research and statistics. It also
provides the necessary skills in the use of various procedures and techniques in conducting,
writing and defending an undergraduate research paper.
2.0 AUDIENCE
Students’ Outcomes
a. Ability to give importance of research and identify topics as well as
✓
research problem related to criminology.
b. Capability to write an introduction, identify theories, draft a paradigm,
state the problems, identify the significance and provide operational ✓
definition to some important terminologies.
c. Recognize literature and studies related to their research that provides
✓
framework and direction to the topics selected.
d. Gather necessary information and data that will be the basis of the
✓
conclusion of recommendation to the problem under study.
e. Ability to present the data gathered in tabular form with the use of
✓
statistical treatment.
f. Provide a conclusion and necessary recommendation based on the data
✓
presented.
g. Present the study and write the miscellaneous parts of the thesis and
provide hard bounded copies to be submitted as partial requirements for
graduation.
1. Able to understand the nature and concept of research and identify topics and
problems that can be significant in the field of criminology.
2. Able to identify and write the parts of research.
3. Gather information, literature, and studies related to the present study that will
frame and be the basis of the present research.
4. Present the data in tabular form with the application of statistical treatments.
5. Make a conclusion and recommendation based on the findings of the study and
present such to chosen beneficiaries.
6. Submit the final output as a partial requirement for graduation.
Table shown next is mapped intended learning outcomes with the student outcomes for the
course.
1. Able to understand the nature and concept of research and identify topics and
problems that can be significant in the field of criminology.
2. Able to write the Introduction by identifying the gaps of the present study.
3. Gather information, literature, and studies related to the present study that will
frame and be the basis of the present research.
4. Present the data in tabular form with the application of statistical treatments.
5. Make a conclusion and recommendation based on the findings of the study and
present such to chosen beneficiaries.
6. Submit the final output as a partial requirement for graduation.
1. Attendance
Attendance will be checked regularly. A student with four (4) absences
will be dropped from the subject. Three (3) occurrence of tardiness is equivalent
to one (1) absent. A student arriving in class after 15 minutes will be considered
absent. Three (3) consecutive absences without any valid reason are considered
dropped, and five (5) cumulative absences without justifying reason will also
be considered dropped from the subject. A student who will justify his/her
absences is required to submit explanation letter duly signed by his/her parents,
attached are the necessary documents/evident that permit justification and the
photocopy of ID of parents with signature.
3. Examinations
There are four major examinations (prelim, midterm, semi-finals and
finals). All major examinations will be closed book, notes, and cell phone.
These examinations will be given in the scheduled time and date set by the
institution unless otherwise specified. The scope of every exam will be the
enumerated topics and discussed in the class. It may include some related topics
given in other related subjects. Examinations are in multiple-choice type and
shading of answers on the separate sheet. Erased or overwritten answers will be
marked wrong.
A special examination will also be given to those students who failed to
take the examination on the scheduled time and date.
Since it is research, there will be one written exam. Other major exams
will be based on their output and rubrics will be used to determine their grade.
Thesis Contents
1. Preliminary Sections
a. Title Page
b. Approval Sheet
c. Abstract
d. Acknowledgment
e. Dedication
f. Table of Contents
g. List of Tables
h. List of Figures
i. Appendices
2. Narrative Parts
a. Introduction
i. Conceptual or Theoretical Framework
ii. Paradigm of the Study
iii. Statement of the Problem
iv. Hypotheses
v. Significance of the Study
vi. Literature Review
b. Methods
c. Results and Discussion
d. Conclusion
e. Recommendations
f. References
g. Appendices
h. Curriculum Vitae
Top – 1.25’
Bottom – 1.00’
Left – 1.5’
Right – 1.00’
Font size
Paragraph – 12
Title – it depends as long as the title become inverted triangle
Paragraph
Title – Center
Body – Justified
Indention – 0.5”
Spacing
Before and after – 0 points
c. Line Spacing
d. Page
Research has been recognized as a vital tool for solving man’s multifarious
problems and in making his life richer and fuller.
Characteristics of Research
1. Systematic – It is systematic as there are interrelated steps or procedures a
researcher has to observe in solving a problem.
2. Objective – It is not based on guesswork. This is because empirical data have to be
gathered by the researcher before making any conclusion or proposing any solution
to an identified difficulty or problem.
3. Comprehensive – If a researcher is serious about understanding a phenomenon, he
has to examine and analyze all its aspects or angles before making a generalization
or conclusion.
4. Critical – This means that procedures employed by the researcher must be able to
withstand critical security by other researchers.
5. Rigorous – It is rigorous as procedures to be followed in solving a problem should
be relevant, appropriate, justified, and strictly observed.
6. Valid – Whenever a researcher formulates conclusions, these are based on actual
findings.
7. Verifiable – Research is said to be verifiable as other researchers can check on the
correctness of its results by replicating the study, based on the methods and
procedures employed by the researcher.
8. Empirical – Research is empirical as generalization drawn by a researcher is rooted
upon hard evidence gathered from information collected from real life experiences
or observations.
Purpose of Research
1. To serve man
2. Good life
3. Understanding
4. Improve judgment
5. Add to his power
6. Reduce the burden of work
7. Relieve suffering
8. Increase satisfaction
where the procedures, devised in the previous step, are implemented by the
researcher rigorously.
5. DATA-ANALYSIS PHASE. In this particular phase, the researcher analyzes the
collected data from the previous step, based on his data analysis plan.
6. INTERPRETATION PHASE. Having analyzed the data, the researcher continues
to make sense out of them by interpreting the results in terms of how they aid in
responding to the research problem posed at the beginning of the study, and how
this answer contributes to knowledge in the field.
7. COMMUNICATION PHASE. After completing the data analysis and
interpretation phases, the researcher has to prepare a written or oral report of the
study conducted, either for publication or presentation to colleagues or a panel of
experts. This report has to include a description of all the above steps in the research
process.
EXAMPLE:
✓ Topic: Dismissal of Drug Cases
✓ Title: Factors affecting Dismissal of Drug Cases in Lipa City: Basis for Corrective
Proposal
✓ Aim or purpose: To assess
✓ Subject matter: Drug Cases
✓ Place/Locale: Lipa City
✓ Period/time frame: 2019
✓ Population: PNP Members and Court Personnel
✓ Variables of the Study: Operational Factors and Procedural Lapses
✓ Data gathering Instrument: Self-made questionnaire
THE TITLE
INTRODUCTION
This section of the research must contain the following:
1. Background of the Study
2. Conceptual/Theoretical Framework
3. Statement of the Problem
4. Hypotheses
5. Definition of Terms
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This section of the research must contain the following:
1. Research Design
2. Population and Sampling Techniques
3. Research Instrument
4. Data Gathering Procedures
5. Statistical Tools
6. Ethical Consideration
studies. This will also discuss the findings in relation to the objectives of the study and the
topic being studied and investigated to draw an implication for the solution of the problem.
REFERENCES
It is the list of books, journal, articles and online documents that are cited in the
development of the study. The institution requires the American Psychological Association
(APA) style of citations and references.
This presents the general idea of the research paper. CARS (creating a research
space) model for writing introduction is a good avenue for the readers of research articles
and academic essays to facilitate their reading and comprehension. It includes a review of
related literature and studies, scope and delimitation as well as the significance of the
study, which are indicated in the three-move format.
Organization of Paragraphs
✓ General Statement
✓ The existence of an unsatisfactory condition, a felt problem that needs a solution
✓ Reason for choosing topic and the problem
✓ The research gaps (from the previous research cited)
✓ Scope and limitations of the study
✓ Geographical conditions of the study locale
✓ Discussion of the variables of the study
✓ Significance of the study
study exists. Thus, the theoretical framework is but a theory that serves as a basis for
conducting research.
After formulating the theoretical framework, the researcher has to develop the
conceptual framework of his study. The framework is a tentative explanation or
theoretical explanation of the problem and serves as the basis for the formulation of
hypothesis.
A paradigm is a diagrammatic representation of a conceptual framework. It depicts
in a more vivid way what the conceptual framework wants to convey. A paradigm may
take different diagrammatic forms, some are in a form of graphical presentation and the
common is the Input-Process-Output presentation. The flow of the study will be explained
based on the relationship of each variable from one another and to come up with the
outcome of the study.
g. Answers to each specific question must contribute to the development of the entire
study.
h. Summing up the answers to all specific questions will give a complete development
of the entire study.
i. The number of specific questions should be enough to cover the development of
the whole research problem or study.
j. Generally, there should be a general statement of the problem and then this should
be broken up into as many subproblems or specific questions as necessary.
4. Hypotheses
This section contains the discussion of the major assumptions regarding the
relationships of the variables being studied.
Hypothesis is a tentative explanation for certain behaviors, phenomena, or events
which have occurred or will occur. It states the researcher’s expectations concerning the
relationship between the variables in the research problem. It is a testable statement of a
potential relationship between two or more variables furnishes the predicted answer to the
questions.
The use of the null hypothesis has been recommended by researchers and
statisticians on the ground that errors in accepting or rejecting the hypothesis can be easier
avoided if the expectations are in the null form.
Moreover, they claim that since it is a statistical hypothesis, it is intended for
testing. It suits statistical techniques that can determine whether the obtained relationship
or difference is due to chance or to true relationship or difference.
The researcher can use null or alternative hypothesis. Null hypothesis says “there
is no difference”, meaning the independent variable does not affect the dependent variable
while alternative hypothesis says “there is a difference”, meaning that, the independent
variable affects the dependent variable.
5. Definition of Terms
It identifies and defines relevant terms significant to the study for further
understanding and interpretation.
Sampling is the process of choosing a portion of a target population that can be the
source of data for one’s research. It is the drawing out of samples from the universe or
population of interest. Population of universe refers to the group from which the samples
shall be drawn. Sample refers to the group from which data have to be collected.
The Primary advantages of sampling, rather than studying the whole population,
are feasibility and convenience. In cases where the target population is quite small and also
accessible, it may be preferable to conduct research using the entire population.
To compute the sample size, Slovin Formula is used with the maximum of 5%
margin of error.
b. Non-Probability Sampling:
✓ No way has that each of the units in the target population had the same chance
of being included in the sample.
✓ No assurance that every unit has some chance of being included.
✓ Conclusion derived from data gathered is limited only to the sample itself.
3. Research Instrument
It is used to collect necessary data from the identified respondents. Questionnaire,
test, interview, observation, checklist, rating scale may be described by the researcher.
Each of the research instruments is explicitly explained.
✓ The respondent can fill out the questionnaire at will. Because nobody is
pressing him to answer the questionnaire immediately, the respondent can
accomplish the questionnaire anywhere at his own convenience.
✓ The respondent has time enough to think reflectively of his replies making then
more
Question Format
✓ General Format. It is a format to give the open-ended question and leave blanks
for the answer; or in close-question, give the answers and provide for boxes or
blanks to check or put the answer by drawing a circle.
✓ Rating. This is a format where the answers to the question are in the form of a
scale meaning, a hierarchy or a graduation of the intensity of response,
according to sets of ordered categories.
✓ Matrix Question. This is a method for organizing a large set of rating questions
that have the same response categories.
✓ Semantic Differential. This is another type of rating scale. It measures the
respondent’s reaction to some objects or concepts in terms of ratings on bipolar
scales defined with contrasting adjectives at each end.
✓ Ranking. The question asked the respondents to choose the degree of priority
or place the importance to the answers. Ranking takes the form of numbering,
starting from one (1) as the first/important or not important.
✓ Card Sort. The respondent is handed a set of cards with a statement on each
card. The respondent is asked to sort these and place the chosen answer into one
of several boxes – which are degrees of agreement with the statement.
Note: The instrument must be validated by the expert in the field which is
called face validation prior to pilot testing. The research instrument will be
distributed to the possible respondent of the study but not the actual respondents of
the study. After such, the researchers may check the reliability of the initial result
of the survey
✓ The researcher can observe his subjects for a long as he needs the time and
as many times as he can for greater accuracy and validity in description and
interpretation.
Having found the questionnaire valid and reliable, the researcher proceeds to ask
permission and approval from the Dean of the College of Criminology and the agency
concerned where the researcher administer their questionnaires. Once permitted, the
researchers administer the instrument to the subject of the study. The date of administration
and retrieval of the instrument will also be stated.
5. Statistical Tools
6. Ethical Consideration
RECOMMENDATIONS
SAMPLE FORMAT