DV3165 Development Management Chapter 1.2
DV3165 Development Management Chapter 1.2
What sort of organisations come into existence and how they evolve are fundamentally
influenced by the institutional framework.
- In return they influence how the institutional framework evolves.
Institutions and organisations are important because they generate incentives that govern
human behaviour.
- Negative incentives include fines, the possibility of losing one’s job, loss of reputation, and
physical punishment, amongst others.
- Consider two identical twins separated at birth. Both have grown up to become inventors.
- One lives in a country with a private market economy populated by firms and individual
agents.
- The other lives in a country with a collectivised, socialist economy composed entirely of
cooperatives.
The differences between institutions and organizations and the interaction between them shape
the direction of institutional change.
- Institutions, determine the opportunities in society.
- Organizations are created to take advantage of those opportunities and as organizations
evolve, they alter the institutions.
- Looking at this from a broader angle, this is how countries develop over time.
(Alternatively, organisations and organisational performance can deteriorate in any or all of
these ways as well).
- Likewise, institutions become more (or less) efficient and effective as the rules that comprise
them are modified or replaced in ways that promote greater (or less) human productivity and
freedom.
> For example, increasing levels of public education in the West, were often portrayed at the
time as a question of human rights, or a moral imperative.
> But a more educated population also increased levels of human capital in the labour force,
boosting productivity, innovation, and facilitating the development of a more sophisticated,
higher value-added economy.
- Such institutional changes are often prodded by changes in the organisations that operate
under institutions, or broader social or cultural changes, whose proponents gain sufficient
political power to ‘institute’ changes beneficial to themselves.
> Hence the extension of civic and political rights down the social ladder in late medieval
Europe was at least partly prompted by outbreaks of plague, which decimated the population,
increasing the value of rural and urban labour.
> Amongst the peasant masses, those who survived found themselves in a much better
bargaining position, and so able to extract concessions from landowners, lords, princes and
priests.
It is the opposite of a laissez-faire approach, which waits for change to happen autonomously,
with no attempt at coordination or catalysis.
- In the laissez-faire approach it is assumed that an equilibrium will be reached on its own if
there is no interference from any external sources
- Thus an attempt at coordination would also be considered to be an external source.
- If political and economic markets were efficient, then the choices made would always be
efficient.
> That the actors would always possess true models or if they initially possessed incorrect
models the information feedback would correct them.
> But that version of the rational actor model has simply led us astray.
> The actors must frequently act on incomplete information and process the information that
they do receive through mental constructs that can result in persistently inefficient paths.
It is, instead, the deliberate, conscious and informed attempt to move institutions and
organisations towards higher levels of efficiency and effectiveness in a way which is faster
than their autonomous rate of progressive change, and – to the extent that this is possible –
more coordinated.
Institutions affect the performance of the economy by their effect on the costs of exchange and
production. They determine the transaction and transformation (production) costs that make up
the total costs
- The major role of institutions in a society is to reduce uncertainty by establishing a stable (but
not necessarily efficient) structure to human interaction.
- From conventions, codes of conduct, and norms of behavior to statute law and common law
and contracts between individuals, institutions are evolving and therefore are continually
altering the choices available to us.
How does one know what sorts of institutions development managers should work towards?
Five criteria are commonly used to differentiate better from worse institutions:
- The difficulties development managers face are enormous, and the risk of failure is high.
- But the benefits to society of success are even greater and all the more worth the risk
because the alternatives are not good.