F2 1-ManagementAccounting
F2 1-ManagementAccounting
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
OF RWANDA
CPA
F2.1
MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNTING
Study Manual
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written
permission of ICPAR.
Acknowledgement
We wish to officially recognize all parties who contributed to revising and updating this Manual, Our thanks are extended
to all tutors and lecturers from various training institutions who actively provided their input toward completion of this
exercise and especially the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN) through its PFM Basket Fund
which supported financially the execution of this assignment
INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS OF RWANDA
Foundation F2
F2.1 MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
This Manual has been fully revised and updated in accordance with the current syllabus/
curriculum. It has been developed in consultation with experienced tutors and lecturers.
Table Of Contents
Just-in-time (jit) 52
Labour 53
Indirect labour 68
Treatment of overtime 69
Notional expenses 71
Capital equipment 72
Introduction to overhead costs 73
Overhead allotment 75
Overhead absorption 83
Activity-based costing 91
Costbook-keeping 100
Cost accounting systems 100
Introduction 111
Service cost units 111
Internal service activities 112
Examples 112
Building up process costs 116
Examples of process costing 117
Losses in process costing – normal losses and abnormal losses 130
The aim of this subject is to ensure that students develop a knowledge and understanding o f the
various cost accounting principles, concepts and techniques appropriate for planning, decision-
making and control and the ability to apply these techniques in the generation of management
accounting reports.
Learning Outcomes
• Explain the relative strengths and weaknesses of alternative cost accumulation methods and
discuss the value of management accounting information.
• Calculate unit costs applying overhead using both absorption costing and activity based costing
principles.
• Apportion and allocate costs to units of production in job, batch and process costing systems,
for the purpose of stock valuation and profit measurement.
• Identify and explain cost behavior patterns and apply cost-volume profit analysis.
• Define and use relevant costs in a range of decision-making situations.
• Prepare and present budgets for planning, control and decision-making.
• Compute, interpret and investigate variances.
• Demonstrate communication skills including the ability to present quantitative and qualitative
information, together with analysis, argument and commentary, in a form appropriate to the
intended audience.
Syllabus:
Definition
What Is “Cost Accounting”?
The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, in its publication, “Terminology of
Management and Financial Accountancy”, defines cost accounting as:
that part of management accounting which establishes budgets and standard costs, and the
actual costs of operations, processes, departments or products and the analysis of variances,
profitability or social use of funds.”
The up-to-date terminology by the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants gives the
following definitions.
Management Accounting has been defined in the words: “The provision of information required
by management for such purposes such as:
• Formulation of policies.
• Planning and controlling the activities of the enterprise.
• Decision taking on alternative courses of action.
• Disclosure to those external to the entity (shareholders and others)
• Disclosure to employees.
• Safeguarding assets.
• sales forecasting
• production forecasting
• earnings forecasting
• cost forecasting
Scope of Management Accounting
Scope of management accounting is very vast and includes various aspects of the business
activities. Management accounting has its scope in the following fields or systems:
1. Financial accounting: - It is the foremost and indispensable part of accounting. In this system,
business transactions of financial character are recorded in the proper subsidiary book. Posting of
these transactions is done in ledger and from this the final accounts are prepared. Final accounts
include profit and loss account and balance sheet. Profit and loss account represents the profit/
loss earned during the accounting period and the balance sheet represents the financial position
of a company as on a particular date. Financial accounting is the foundation from management
accounting as it provides the necessary information for preparation of details and reports to be
presented to the management.
2. Cost Accounting: - Cost accounting is one of the important branches of accounting. It ascertains
the cost of producing a particular commodity and rendering of services cost of selling and
distribution. It facilitates effective planning regarding commodities, proper decision-making and
cost control. Some of the important tools of cost accounting are marginal costing, standard
costing and budgetary control.
3. Revaluation accounting: - Revaluation accounting ensures that capital is represented at its real
value in the accounts and the profit has been calculated keeping this fact in mind. In other words,
it assures that the assets are revalued according to the need and its effect has been brought
into the accounts. Management accounting helps to ascertain the revalued figures of the assets.
4. Control accounting: - Controlling means to measure the variation, if any, between actual and
the standard results and taking corrective measures to remove that variation. Management
accounting is the indispensible part of control accounting, budgetary control, inventory control,
equality control are some of the important techniques of management accounting for control
accounting.
6. Interim reporting: - Interim reporting means preparation of reports on monthly, quarterly and
half-yearly basis. These reports include income statement, cash flow statement, funds flow
statement, scrap reports etc.
7. Internal audit: - Internal audit means audit of various departments by the internal members of
the organization. The techniques of management accounting can be used to judge the efficiency
and economy of the organization. Ratio analysis and funds flow analysis are widely used to
judge the efficiency of an organization.
8. Taxation: - Tax planning and its management is an essential function of the management.
It includes computation of income as per tax laws, filing of returns and payment of tax within
stipulated time.
b) Control Information
A more modern concept of cost accounting is that its purpose is to assist management by
Providing them with control information.
This usually demands more from the cost accountant. He or she will still produce statistical
statements, but will be required to analyses and interpret these statements. Comparisons will
be made with “budgets” and“standards”,and the cost accountant will probably use the exception
system of reporting, advising management only where action is required.
c) ManagementTool
Cost accounting has often been likened to a tool in the hands of management. Consider
what this means:
• It must be the right tool. The cost accountant, in consultation with management, must agree
what information is required and when ;the cost of providing it will also have to be taken into
consideration. The question must also be asked, is complete accuracy necessary? Will an
approximation within given limits be of more value, if it can be provided swiftly?
Any system of costing must be tailored to suit the organisation which it serves. In many cases
simple historical cost accounting will be sufficient; in others a more sophisticated system may
be necessary.
• It is management who use the tool, and the extent of its success will depend up on the degree
of efficiency with which it is used.
• Finding out the cost of each product (or service),process and department-costs must be
ascertained in phase with manufacturing activity, enabling remedial action to be taken quickly
when it is required.
• Comparing the costs with budget, standard or past performance figures to indicate the degree
of efficiency attained.
• Analyzing the variances from budget and identifying the person or department responsible so
that prompt, remedial action may be taken.
• Disclosing to what extent production facilities are used and indicating the amount and cost of
idle and waiting time.
• Presenting the information suitably to management in such a form as to guide them in taking
any necessary action.
• Provision of information to assist in the regulation of production and the systematic control of
the organisation.
• Provision of special investigations and reports. These might deal with such matters as:
Whether to manufacture apart or to sub-contract another firm. The advisability of installing new
machinery. The effect of increased or reduced production volumes on profitability.
Despite the value of the financial accounts, it was their inadequacy which gave rise to the
introduction of costing and the development of costing techniques. The financial accounts show
primarily external transactions (sales, purchases, borrowing, etc.) and the profit for the organisation
as a whole. Management requires detailed knowledge of the cost of each product or unit, of each
department or process to show how the profit was built up and the relative profitability of each
section of the business. Cost accounting has now become an essential factor of every business.
It is of interest that in recent years “integrated accounts”(see later in this study unit) have grown
in popularity. Integrated accounts are merely the combining of the financial and cost accounts
into one set of books. We seem to have come full circle ,from the separation of the financial and
cost accounts, through the development of costing, to the joining together of the two systems into
one integral system. Of course, in many businesses increasing computerization has assisted this
development.
Management information provides a common source from which is drawn information for financial
accounts and management accounts.
The data used to prepare financial accounts and management accounts are the same.
Differences between Management Accounting and Financial Accounting
1. Legal requirements: Financial accounts must be prepared as a statutory requirement while
management accounting is not compulsory as it depends on the management needs. It is a
statutory requirement for all public limited companies to produce annual accounts at the end
of every financial year while management accounting is optional.
3. Focus on part of organisation : Financial accounting reports describe the whole of the
organization/business while as management accounting focus on small parts of the organization.
6. Time dimension: Financial accounting reports what has already happened in the past in an
organization while as management accounting is concerned with future information as well
as past information
7. Unit of measurement: Management accounting addresses financial and non financial
performance measures (issues that cannot be quantified) as decision making cannot be
enhanced by using quantitative information only while financial accounting addresses
financial performance measures i.e. matters than can be expressed in monetary terms.
8. Auditing requirement: Financial accounts must be subjected to an external audit since
they are used by external parties but it is not a requirement to audit cost and management
accounts.
InvestigatingCosts
The cost accountant would not be satisfied merely to ascertain the figures, however. Perhaps
costs can bereduced, and/or revenues, and/orproduction increased.
The cost accountant will consult the sales manager. It may be that increases in price will result in
a decrease in sales. Moreover, financial considerations are not the only ones to be borne in mind.
By pursuing such enquiries, the cost accountant is achieving these function of costing, that is,
cost control. It should be stated here that it is not the cost accountant’s job to make executive
decisions, but merely to express the management’s policy in terms of money, and to indicate
where efficiency may be increased.
Guiding ManagementPolicy
A most important idea to the cost accountant’s work is providing information to management
At all levels. His or her job is to advise management of the financial effects of alternative policies.
He or she is an adviser only; it is for the manager to make policy decisions. Thus the cost
accounting system will justify itself only when the information it produces is used by management.
(Management accountants are part of “Management” and make use of both cost accounting
information and financial accounting information for their involvement in management decisions.)
• position in themarket;
• environmental considerations;
• legal constraints;
• staff qualifications and training needs
Desirable qualities of management accounting information
To ensure that the management accounting information is used effectively, the following attributes
must be considered:
• Relevance: The information must be relevant for the purpose for which the manager wants to
use it.
• Accuracy: The information should be sufficiently accurate for the intended purpose. Incorrect
information could have serious and damaging consequences.
• Timing: The information must be produced in time for it to be used effectively. Information which
is not available until after decision is made will be useful only on comparison and long term
control, and may serve no purpose even then.
• Understandability: The information must be capable of being understood by the recipient. The
information must be clear to the user.
• Volume/Details: The amount of details in a statement or report will depend on the recipient
level in the organization. Reports to the management must therefore be clear and concise.
• Completeness: An information user should have all the information he needs to do his job
properly.
• Communication: Within any organization, individuals are given the authority to do certain tasks,
and they must be given the information they need to do them. Budget must be provided to the
managers so as to assist him in controlling the expenditures in his office.
• Channel of communication: There are occasions when using one particular method of
communication will be better than others. The channel of communication might be the company’s
in-house journal, a national or local newspaper, a professional magazine, a job centre or school
careers office.
• Cost: Information should have some value, otherwise it would not be worth the cost of collecting
and filing it. The benefits obtained from the information must also exceed the costs of acquiring
it, and whenever management is trying to decide whether or not to produce information for a
particular purpose a cost/benefit analysis ought to be made.
COST CLASSIFICATION
Cost classification may be defined as ‘the arrangement of cost items in a logical sequence
having regard to their nature and purpose to be fulfilled’. The term cost must be qualified when in
use in order that its precise meaning is established in a particular situation; however, cost refers
to the amount of resources that have been diverted from other uses or sacrificed so as to achieve
the desired objective. But the term is used to refer to various aspects of cost, depending on the
base of argument that one is approaching the issue from.
Different bases are used in classifying costs, thus giving us several types of costs. We look at
these bases in the following sections.
14 F2.1 Management Accounting CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
Cost Classification bases
Costs can be classified on either one or more of the following bases:
• Are the costs dependent on the level of output (variable) or are the costs the same irrespective
of the level of output (fixed)?
• Have the costs already been incurred (sunk) or are they going to be incurred in the future
depending on what we decide (incremental) ?
• Are they already incurred (sunk/historical) or are the costs due to a benefit foregone for not
taking a certain option (opportunity cost)?
• Are we in a position to decide not to incur the costs (avoidable) or are we bound to incur them
by authorities we are subject to such as higher managers and the government (unavoidable)?
• Are the costs actually incurred (actual) or are they the expected as per the expenditure guidelines
set by the management (standard)?
• Can we be able to control the costs , for example , by varying the level of output or by making
appropriate decisions (controllable costs) , or are the costs beyond us because they are fixed
or the decisions are made by higher authorities (uncontrollable)?
• Can we trace the exact costs incurred to the final product (direct costs) or can we not, may be
only estimate such costs (indirect costs)?
• What is the function that makes the costs to be incurred in the organization, is it production,
administration or selling and distribution?
• Is the cost incurred for manufacturing reasons (production cost) or for manufacturing support
reasons (non-manufacturing cost)?
• How does the cost behave with respect to changes in the output level,
• Does it remain fixed through-out irrespective of the output level (fixed cost),
• Does it change proportionately with the change in output level (variable cost),
• Does it remain fixed when output is zero but increases as output increases from that
point onwards (semi-variable); or
• Does the cost remain fixed within certain production bands but change immediately to
another fixed level once the output band changes (a stepped cost)?
These different bases of cost classification are summarized in the diagram below:
Direct/indirect
incremental/sunk
Direct/indirect historic/opportunity
Functional
Classification
Cost Behaviour
Avoidable/
unavoidable
Controllable/
Uncontrollable
Standard/actual
In our course, we will always refer to either of these terminologies every now and then, in different
cost accounting situations. You will also meet them extensively in Management Accounting in
the advanced stages of your course, where you will utilize their distinction to make appropriate
profit maximizing management decisions as well as budgetary planning and control.
Remember, a cost is simply a quantification or measurement of the economic sacrifice made to
achieve a given objective. It is therefore a measurement of the amount of resources sacrificed
in attaining a specified goal.
Manufacturing costs are the costs incurred to produce a product. Remember that a product
refers to both goods and services.
The elements of manufacturing costs are :
• Material costs,
• Labour costs; and
• Overhead costs.
• Raw material refers to bought in material which is used in the manufacture of the product.
According to the organization raw material may further be classified as steel, timber e.t.c.
• Components and subassemblies i.e. bought in components and subassemblies which are
incorporated in the product
• Work in progress i.e. partly completed assemblies and products incorporating raw materials
and or subassemblies
• Consumable materials i.e. materials used in the operation of the factory and during production
but do not appear in the product e.g. detergents
• Maintenance materials i.e. materials of all types used in maintaining machinery, buildings and
vehicles e.g. spare parts, lubricating oil and grease
• Office materials; materials used in operation of the office e.g. stationery
b) Labour costs
What is labour?
Labour costs could be direct or indirect labour costs.
Direct labour cost refers to wages paid to workers who are directly involved in the conversion
of raw materials into finished goods. These are called direct labour costs
Indirect labour costs refers to the wages paid to workers whose efforts cannot be readily
identified with specific product units or batches e.g. labourers paid to maintain all the premises
utilized for production of goods and services.
c) Overhead costs:
They are also called indirect production costs. They are those costs which can only be charged
to a cost unit using some estimated basis. The estimating procedure allows a share of the
indirect costs to be charged to each cost unit. These costs cannot be identified specifically to
the end product.
Costs
Variable Costs
0
Activity level
Costs
Variable
Costs
Fixed
Costs
Activity level
Fixed Costs
Are costs that do not change with of the level of output. It is also called autonomous cost, as it
remains the same irrespective of the activity level as shown below.
Costs
Fixed
Costs
Activity level
Costs
Variable component
Semi
variable
Costs
Fixed component
Activity level
• Direct costs consist of costs that can be directly attributed to a specific output, product or level
of activity. Direct costs include direct raw materials and direct labour also called prime costs in
aggregate.
PRIME COST = Direct Material Cost + Direct Labour Cost
• Indirect costs are costs that will not be directly attributable to a specific product. They are
regarded as overheads. Identification of overheads to specific products is done through cost
allocation and apportionment. They include supervisors’ salaries, rent, electricity, depreciation
of building etc.
• Controllable cost; Refers to the cost which can be influenced by the actions of a person in
whom authority for such control is vested, for example control of labour cost will be influenced
by the method of remuneration and the degree at management control which is exercised by a
certain managers.
• Non controllable cost: is cost which cannot be influenced by a person in whom authority
for such control is vested for example if the trade union demands an increase in wages the
increment is non controllable cost. Similarly, the depreciation of a building is a non-controllable
cost to a manager as he does not have authority over depreciation!
• Production costs: Are all the costs incurred in production of units during a time period e.g. raw
material costs, direct labour costs and production overheads.
• Administration costs: These are all costs incurred in ensuring the smooth running of the
organization so as to facilitate the production and sale of goods and services. These include:
salaries for the managers, salaries for support employees (such as accountants, clerks and
secretaries) etc
• Selling and distribution costs: These are costs that are incurred to enable the delivery of
products and services to the actual markets and promote or complete a sale. These costs
include: salesmen commission, saleswoman salaries, advertising costs, depreciation on motor
vehicles used by salesmen, the cost of fuel used by vehicles used for distribution purposes etc.
• Other functional classifications
ETHICAL ISSUES
Ethical responsibilities of management accountants
Management accountants have an obligation to the organisations they serve, their profession, the
public, and themselves to maintain the highest standards of ethics.
Management accountants should behave ethically. They have an obligation to follow the highest
standards of ethical responsibility and maintain good professional image.
The Institute of Management Accountants (IMA) has developed four standards of ethical conduct for
management accountants and financial managers. These standards has since then been revered as
the central code for accounting professionals.
1. Competence
2. Confidentiality
• Refrain from disclosing confidential information acquired in the course of their work except when
authorized, unless legally obligated to do so.
• Inform subordinates as appropriate regarding the confidentiality of information acquired in the
course of their work and monito- their activities to assure the maintenance of that confidentiality.
• Refrain from using or appearing to use confidential information acquired in the course of their
work for unethical or illegal advantage either personally or through third parties.
• Avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest and advise all appropriate parties of any potential
conflict.
• Refrain from engaging in any activity that would prejudice their ability to carry out their duties
ethically.
• Refuse any gift, favour, or hospitality that would influence or would appear to influence their
actions.
• Refrain from either actively or passively subverting the attainment of the organisation’s legitimate
and ethical objectives.
• Recognise and communicate professional limitations or other constraints that would preclude
responsible judgment or successful performance of an activity
• Communicate unfavourable as well as favourable information and professional judgments or
opinions
• Refrain from engaging in or supporting any activity that would discredit the profession
4. Credibility
• Discuss such problems with the immediate superior except when it appears that the superior is
involved, in which case the problem should be presented initially to the next higher managerial
level.
• If a satisfactory resolution cannot be achieved when the problem is initially presented, submit
the issues to the next higher managerial level. If the immediate superior is the chief executive
officer, or equivalent, the acceptable reviewing authority may be a group such as the audit
committee, executive committee, board of directors, board of trustees, or owners. Contact with
levels above the immediate superior should be initiated only with the superior’s knowledge,
assuming the superior is not involved. Except where legally prescribed, communication of
such problems to authorities or individuals not employed or engaged by the organisation is not
considered appropriate.
• Clarify relevant ethical issues by confidential discussion with an objective advisor to obtain
a better understanding of possible courses of action. Consult your own attorney as to legal
obligations and rights concerning the ethical conflict.
• If the ethical conflict still exits after exhausting all levels of internal review, there may be no other
recourse on significant matters than to resign from the organisation and to submit an informative
memorandum to an appropriate representative of the organisation. After resignation, depending
on the
• Inputs income and expense transactions into the organization accounting system
• Manages organization invoices, these can range from customer invoices to payables invoices
• Checks data accuracy, this involves confirming from source documents
• Present Information, this involves doing simple reports to illustrate information
• Performs administrative duties such as inventory count participation, payroll preparation and
cost accounting
Waste
Adequate control is necessary to guard against the many forms of waste which occur, such as
carelessness, pilfering, breakages, breaking bulk materials into small lots, overstocking, etc.
Overstocking
This causes loss by wasting space and congesting the stores; physical deterioration through
evaporation, shrinkage, damporrust; obsolescence, so that space is wasted by out-of-date
material; and loss of interest on capital need lessly locked up.
Inefficient purchasing may result in direct financial loss by buying in the wrong market at the wrong
time, and in indirect loss by holding up the work on account of the failure to secure deliveries at
the required time.
C. OUTLINE OF PROCEDURES
We shall now briefly outline the procedures necessary in the purchase, receipt, storage, issue
and transfer of materials.
OrderingStock
ReceivingStock
IssuingStock
StoringStock
StockLevels
Buying
• Requests for the purchase of materials should always be made to the purchasing officer, who
can co-ordinate the requirements of several departments.
• The purchasing officer should maintain records so that the best possible terms can be obtained
for the goods required. (This will usually mean best possible price, but occasionally it may be
necessary to accept a higher price, for instance to obtain speedier delivery.)
• Official order forms should be issued by the purchasing department and copies should be raised
as follows:
Receipt
All goods should be introduced into the organisation through a designated and controlled
area. The material should be inspected by a competent official, who should prepare, in duplicate,
a goods received note. One of these forms should be passed to the purchasing department for
comparison with the copy of the order for mind the invoice when it comes to hand. The second
copy will be passed to the store man, who will enter details on the bin card when receiving the
goods. (Bin cards are more fully described in the next study unit.)
It is common for a firm supplying goods to require a signature of an authorized official of the
recipient organisation. Such procedures obviously improve the internal controls within the supplier
but often the recipient is acknowledging that he has received the goods, in full, in good condition.
In many cases the necessary testing and checking will take some time so it is usual to sign the
delivery note and add the word “unexamined”. This provides satisfactory evidence to the supplier
that a delivery was made, without preventing the recipient from taking action should some of the
goods be missing or defective.
It is essential that the goods are thoroughly checked as soon as possible after receipt and that
the supplier is advised of any problems at the earliest opportunity. Normally all contact on such
matters will be made by the buyer, who will make use of other technical expertise within the
organisation as necessary.
Depending up on the nature of the product, it is sometimes possible to undertake sample checking
of quantity or quality. In some circumstances it may be necessary to undertake a full testing
procedure, on a strictly limited basis, often to the point of actually destroying the component.
Again,depending up on the nature of the product, the purchaser may have made it a condition
of his order that, if the specified sample fails his acceptance test, he will be Entitled to reject the
whole batch. Such procedures are often used by multiple retailers, especially in the clothing
industry.
If the materials are not in good condition, the purchasing department must be informed immediately,
so that the supplier can be contacted. Often, a goods rejected note is prepared to maintain a
formal record and to prevent in advertent payment of the invoice.
Storage
The point at which goods are stored should be functionally designed and have adequate
security. Each storage should allow easy handling of ,and access to, each commodity stored. The
sites of stores in an organisation should be carefully planned in relation to cost reduction. Having
one centralised store will reduce accommodation costs and wages but will result in more internal
transportation and longer lead-times for production departments to get hold of materials.
Issue
The main transactions affecting a system of material control arise from the issue of materials
from storage. All materials are issued on an authorization known as a “stores requisition”. This
The requisitions, bearing the number of the cost unit or department for which the goods are to be
used, are passed to the cost department, where they will be priced. Following normal double
entry principles, we must credit the material accounts and debit the job or process accounts with
the value of materials used.
Flowchart
The following flowchart (Figure11) illustrates the movement of goods and paperwork as
Described above.
Figure 11
Main Documents
PURCHASE REQUISITION
Figure 12
Normally, three copies of the purchase requisition will be prepared and routed, as follows: (1) To
the purchasing department.
• To the planning department for information purposes, or this copy may be held by the authorizing
executive.
• Retained by the issuing department.
A list of officials with power to authorize requisitions should be compiled and properly authorized
requisitions only should be accepted by the purchasing department. Most requisitions will come
from the storekeeper, when stocks of standard materials need replenishing. Requisitions may
also be initiated by:
The purchase order normally incorporates the purchaser’s terms and conditions of purchase;
acceptance of the order is deemed to imply acceptance under the purchaser’s terms. This is an
important consideration regarding the ultimate acceptance of the goods and any subsequent
claims made for defective goods. A significant amount of a purchasing officer’s time can often be
taken up in agreeing whose terms are applicable to a particular order.
Date ..........................
Please supply in accordance with the instructions given on the back of this order.
Terms:
Signed
forABC Co.Ltd
.............................
Figure 13
Inward Order No
. No. Details
Date Delivery Note
Date
Item Code For use of Storekeeper
No. (if stock
Remarks Purchase
Details Quantity
Material)
Req. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
A specification of materials (also known as a bill of materials) is a form which shows all the
materials and items which will be required for a particular order; this is prepared by the drawing
office.
On receipt of such specification, the store keeper will be able to foresee the requirements of the
particular job concerned, and will make sure that he has the necessary materials in stock. If he
is short of any of them, he will prepare a stock purchase requisition, and will inform the planning
department so that any re adjustment of plans necessitated by a shortage of material may be
made
RECEIVING DEPARTMENT
Duties
• Date received
• Supplier and carrier
• Very brief description of the goods
• Reference to the goods received note when compiled.
The next step is the preparation of the goods received note (see below).
Spaces A to G on the form shown (Figure 15) will be filled in at the goods receiving department. It
will then be sent with the goods to the stores department, where the goods will be unpacked and
their quality and condition inspected. If he is satisfied, the inspector will then sign in the space
H and the document will be forwarded to the purchasing department.
If the inspector is dissatisfied with the goods, he will issue a goods rejected slip and send this to
the purchasing department.
Supplier: No. 1
..........................G.............................
...........................................................
........................................................... Date Received 19.........
...................
Purchase
Carrier Received by: Inspected by:
OrderNo.
D E F H
Figure 15
CPA EXAMINATION F2.1 Management Accounting 33
STUDY MANUAL
Space may be provided on the goods received note for the insertion of a goods rejected slip
number and the bin or location number where the goods are finally placed by the storekeeper.
Space may also be provided for the number and type of containers and for reference to a separate
report, e.g. inspection, shortage, damage report.
Rejected Goods
When goods are found to be defective or otherwise not in accordance with the order, they
will be rejected. When goods are rejected, a routine similar to the following should be adopted:
• A goods rejected note, similar to that shown in Figure 16 should be prepared in triplicate.
• One copy of this note should be sent to the purchasing department, which will then arrange with
the supplier to obtain credit and arrange for the replacement of the rejected goods.
• The second copy should be sent to the planning department, which may have to modify
its plans regarding work with the material concerned.
• The third copy is filed in the stores.
GOODS REJECTED NOTE
Figure 16
Spaces (b) and (c) will be filled in by the purchasing department; the requisite numbers
are obtained by reference to the copy order book, in which the number of goods
received note will have been entered. If each invoice is entered and registered under
a serial number, this number being entered in the copy order book, there should be no
possibility of passing a duplicate invoice. The register of invoices may be compiled in
the purchasing department, the serial number being entered into space (a). The person
who is responsible for checking calculations will initial in space (d).
Forward (j)
Job Ledger
Figure 17
In large businesses, where hundreds or thousands of invoices are handled daily, the
calculations may be checked by a special department.
Spaces (e) and (f) will be initialed by a member of the purchasing department, reference
being made to the signature on the goods received note for confirmation that the goods are of the
required quality and quantity.
The account to which the purchase is to be charged, e.g. whether it is ordinary stock material or
whether it is material purchased for a specific job which has to be charged to the cost account
for that job, will be entered in space (g). The folio of the entry in either the stores ledger (for
standard materials) or the job ledger (for orders in connection with special jobs) will be entered
in space (j).
The invoices will then be passed to the accounts office, where they will be entered in the purchase
journal for posting to the bought ledger and the bought ledger control account. The purchase
journal folio will be entered in space (h).
Finally, the invoice will be passed for payment by the authorised official, who signs in space (k).
STORES REQUISITION
Figure 18
The price and amount will be entered by the cost office after the document has been recorded
by the stores.
• When any material is required for a job in a department, the foreman makes out a stores (or
materials) requisition. He signs this and it is taken to the storekeeper. Note that frequently the
requisitions for a particular job are made out by the planning or progress department from the
bill of materials and passed to the foreman only when he is ready to start the job. It is also
sometimes required that the requisition number should be entered on the bill of materials.
Transfers should be made only if the goods are immediately required by another department and
if it is clearly more efficient (because of location) to make a direct transfer. Otherwise all unused
materials should be returned to the stores, as described above, for reissue.
D. STOCK LEVELS
In order to ensure that the flow of production is not impaired by the lack of materials and also that
excessive capital is not tied up in stocks, it is necessary to ensure that the level of stock held
always lies between certain limits.
Maximum Quantity
This represents the greatest amount of an item of stock which should be carried if the best use
is to be made of working capital.
In determining the maximum stock level, the following are among the factors considered: (a)
Capital tied up in stocks.
• Capital available.
• Cost of storage (including rent, insurance, labour costs).
• Storage space available.
• Consumption rate.
• Economic purchasing quantities (see later).
• Market conditions and prices, seasonal considerations.
• Nature of material - possible deterioration or obsolescence.
Minimum Quantity
This represents the level below which the stock should not normally be allowed to fall if the
requirements of production are to be met.
Reorder Level
It is necessary to set a point at which an order must be placed. This point is known as the
reorder level. It will be higher than the minimum level, to cover use during the period
before the order is received.
Reorder Quantity
The reorder quantity is the quantity which should be ordered at the time the reorder
level is reached. It will depend on the discounts available from suppliers for bulk ordering, the
cost of placing an order and the cost of storage (see later).
Formulae
Reorderlevel = Maximum consumption ×Maximum reorderperiod.
Minimum stock = Reorderlevel – (Normal consumption ×Normal reorderperiod).
Maximum stock = Reorderlevel+Reorderquantity– (Minimum consumption × Minimum
reorderperiod).
Averagestock =Minimum stock +½ Reorderquantity.
These levels should be reviewed periodically to ensure that they reflect current conditions.
Example
Component A is used as follows:
Normal usage 50 perweek
Minimum usage 25 perweek
Maximum usage 75 perweek
Reorderquantity 300
Reorderperiod 4-6 weeks
Calculatethe reorderlevel, theminimum and maximum levels, and the averagestock level.
Solution
Reorderlevel = Maximum consumption ×Maximum reorderperiod
=75 ×6
=450
Minimum level = Reorderlevel – (Normal consumption ×Normal reorderperiod)
=450 – 50 ×5
=200
Maximumlevel = Reorderlevel +Reorderquantity– (Minimum consumption × Minimum
reorderperiod)
=450 +300 – (25 × 4)
=650
Averagelevel = Minimum stock +onehalfReorderquantity
= 200 +(300 ÷ 2)
=350.
Formula
There is a formula which tells a company the optimum batch size in which to purchase
goods.
The formulais:
Q = 2CoDCh
Where:
Q is the economic order quantity;
Co is the fixed cost of placing an order, i.e. delivery charges, clerical time in placing
order, checking invoice, etc., which do not vary with the size of the order; if the goods are
produced internally it will include fixed production costs incurred specifically in producing
the batch, e.g. tool setting;
You should notice that the model is rather limited: the unit cost is assumed to be constant. There
is no provision for quantity discounts which might make it more attractive to purchase larger
quantities.
Or
1
Formula:
2 D Co
CH
Where:
Do = Demand
C = Cost of Ordering
C = Cost of holding
H
Example
A company uses 4,000 components, type “A”, in a year. The cost of placing an order is
RWF20. The stockholding cost is RWF4 per item per year. Stocks are replenished when the
stock level falls to 50 units; orders placed are received the same day. Calculate the economic
order quantity.
Solution
2DS
Using the formula Q =
H
2 4,000 20
Then, Q = 4
40,000
=
= 200
orders should be placed for batches of 200 units at a time.
STOCK TURNOVER
This term expresses the number of times stock is sold or used within a given period. Usually it is
expressed as a ratio:
Cost ofsales fora specificperiod
Averagevalueofstock held
Example:
Cost ofstock sold in Year1RWF600,000
Openingstock RWF30,000
Closingstock RWF20,000
RWF600,000
Stock turnover = = 24 times per year.
RWF25,000
These records are maintained at the physical point of storage and usually show only
quantities, not costs, of items held. The storekeeper is responsible for keeping the bin cards up-
to-date.
The bin card records receipts, issues and the balance remaining in stock. The receipts side
will show entries from goods received notes and returned to stores notes and the issues
portion shows the goods passed to production as per stores requisition slips. The balance on
hand shown on the card should equal the physical number of items in stock.
The bin card may also show the materials allocated, i.e. reserved for a particular cost unit but not
yet issued; and free stock, which is the balance on order and on hand less the allocated stock.
This is because the reorder level is sometimes set in terms of the free stock level.
F. STOCKTAKING
This is a process whereby stocks (which may comprise direct and indirect materials, work-in-
progress and finished goods) are physically counted and are then valued item by item.
The perpetual inventory routine needs to be thoroughly documented within the organisation,
and active measures taken to ensure that laid-down procedures are followed. This is
necessary not only to gain the greatest internal advantage of this approach, but also in order that
the auditors may be convinced of the validity of the stock figures. To this end the auditors will
Methods of Stocktaking
As a general rule this is only carried out when items are of reasonable size; where nuts, bolts or
nails are concerned, it is usual to weigh the items or estimate the amount by experience. The
individual count method is very slow and laborious if there are a large number of items involved.
This method can be greatly speeded up if stock is stored in standard quantities or bundles, so
that it merely becomes a question of counting the number of bundles.
In certain cases usage may be measured by a type of meter which does not record deliveries or
stock remaining, e.g. a petrol pump of the older type. A theoretical stock value will be continuously
maintained, but the contents of the tank will be compared with this at regular intervals. A dip-
stick will normally be used for this purpose. This method of measurement relies on the fact that
one dip-stick is maintained for each size of tank, and the degree of accuracy will depend on the
calibration of the stick.
Measurement by Calculation
There are many materials which are solids but cannot be counted individually, e.g. coal,
flour or sugar. The amount of such items can be calculated by ascertaining the cubic space taken
up measured, for example, in cubic feet; so that by using the known weight of the commodity per
cubic foot, the total weight can be obtained for pricing.
With an annual stock take (rather than a continuous system) the greatest problem is that of getting
the full procedure carried out in the time allowed. The deadline allowed for the completion of
stock figures is some time before the completion of the annual accounts. As the physical count
cannot take place before the close of the last day’s business, the time available is short and the
work to be done considerable.
One week before stocktaking, therefore, a responsible official can check that the correct forms
have been issued to the various sections and departments and have been completed in
respect of date, heading and all static information. This will eliminate one of the common bottle-
necks caused by people complaining that they did not receive the correct forms or did not receive
any forms at all.
Careful design of forms can also save time at the actual stocktaking. They should be on stout card
so that they are not damaged in the stores, logically laid out so that the person completing
them can work from left to right, and should ask only for relevant information.
(c) Valuation
Having ascertained the quantity of stock, this has to be converted to a value in RWF.We will
consider this later.
(d) Checking
On completion of the calculation and the checking, it should be the specific
responsibility of the official in charge of stocktaking to ensure that all stock sheets issued
have been returned fully completed.
Any additional sheets relating to new types of stock should be specially studied, so that at the
following stocktaking the appropriate preparatory work can be carried out.
All sections should then be merged into a stock summary, taking care to ensure a full audit
trail back from the final stock value to the individual items of stock.
Conversely, if a manufacturer has, through good fortune or foresight, acquired considerable stocks
of a material at a price below that currently ruling and he acquires business which will use those
materials, he will want to take advantage of this good buying by placing a quote which includes
the current market value of the materials. (The manufacturer will not always get away with this!
In particular, if he is a contractor for a government department he will be obliged to charge for the
materials at cost.)
The use of market prices therefore gives credit for good buying and the reverse for bad
buying. The difficulty is to establish the current market price and, as this does not line up with
the actual cost of the materials, it is necessary to operate an adjustment account to take care of
the differences.
At Inflated Cost
This method is used to cover the unavoidable wastage which may occur in certain
circumstances. The changes which often take place in this wastage render the method
inaccurate and an adjustment account will have to be opened.
At Cost Price
Issue of materials is usually carried out on this basis, and clearly it is not necessary to use an
adjustment account. There are several conventions by which materials can be issued at cost
price; the most usual are described below.
If the transactions involved are numerous, this method involves a great deal of clerical effort, and
it is therefore best used for slow-moving stock where the value is high and the price does not
fluctuate a great deal. In times of rising prices, the valuation of issues tends to be low. On
Advantages of FIFO
Disadvantages of FIFO
Example
Assume the following purchases were made in ABEZA Ltd
Date of purchase Units purchased Units issued Price/unit (RWF)
1 January 12 1.00
st
4th February 5
10th February 6
11th February 10 1.05
15th February 9
Required:
Determine the cost of units used and the value of the closing stocks
Solution
Receipts Issues Balance
Date Units Rate Amount Units Rate Amount Units Amount
(1)
1.05 1.05 9 9.45
FIFO may be inequitable in that two jobs on the same day may be charged different rates for
the same material.
Advantages of LIFO
Disadvantages of LIFO
Solution
This method has the advantage of spreading the cost more evenly. It can be used to advantage
where the price of materials fluctuates rapidly and is a useful method for computerized accounting.
However, like the LIFO and FIFO methods, it may involve a lot of clerical work.
Should there be an extremely high or low price, it is reflected in the costs for a long
time afterwards.
A simplification is to use a periodic weighted average, calculating the average net after each
receipt but retrospectively once a month (say). If this method were used in the previous example,
the average for January would be RWF1.0469 (32 units received at RWF33.50) and this would
be used for both issues in January. The balance on hand at the beginning of February would
then be valued at RWF19.89 (19 units at RWF1.0469), so the retrospective weighted average
for February would be RWF1.0479 ((RWF19.89 plus RWF10.50) divided by 29).
A further simplification is to use a simple average, i.e. adding up the prices without weighting for
quantity and dividing by the number of prices. Again this may be calculated on the continuous
or periodic system.
Using the continuous system, the simple average for the 1 January to 10 January
consignments would be RWF1.025 ((RWF1 plus RWF1.05) divided by 2). This method
should only be used when there is little fluctuation in prices, but it can be a useful time-saving
short-cut.
• Prices and closing stock values can be lower than the market value.
• When using this system, actual price can run into several decimal places.
Good records are essential, as the replacement price at the time of each issue must be known
and this is only likely to be realistic in a fully computerised environment. The system has the
advantage that all issues are made at current economic value, but this in itself will lead to the
generation of sundry profits and losses on stock holdings.
It is similar in concept to the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), when ordering goods from an
external supplier. However, there is an important difference. When stock is manufactured internally
in a batch, units of the stock item can start to be delivered into stores before the batch production
run has been completed.
The first units of the batch will therefore be delivered into stores before the final units have been
manufactured and these units can be used immediately.
The average stock level is therefore not Q/2, because this is the average stock level when the
maximum stock level is Q. With internal batch production, the maximum stock level is:
Q(1 – D/R)
Where:
D = the rate of demand for the stock item
R = the rate at which the stock item can be manufactured
2 x 2,025 x 60,000
Obsolete stock is dead cash. All possible steps must be taken to prevent stock
from becoming obsolete by the co-ordination of the efforts of all concerned. For
example, the design department may agree to a modification being held back until
existing stocks have been used; or the sales department may have a big “push” on an
item which is shortly to be dropped, so as to clear out stocks.
Yet some obsolescence is unavoidable. It is a good thing to keep a separate section of the
stores, to which any stocks declared obsolete should be transferred immediately.
Thought must be given as to whether there will be a demand for spares for old models
still in existence and, if so, some parts must be set aside for this purpose.
The remaining problem then is the one of finding the best possible market for the
remainder. The buying department is usually in the best position to do this.
Remember, it is not only the cost of the materials which is tied up, but storage space, labour, etc.
Slow-moving stock may consist of items which are only issued at long intervals. Obviously an
item like this will not be featured as a stock receipt until, after a long interval, it drops to reorder
level. At that time, either the storekeeper will mark the reorder requisition “SM” so that the matter
will be investigated, or, in the case of an automatic system, the item will be printed out by the
computer as an exception for special study.
However, Japanese companies, most notably Toyota, developed a different system, known as
Just-In-Time or Stockless Production. This system is not a “push” system but a “pull” system.
A product is not made until the customer requests it and components are not made until they are
required by the next production stage. In a full JIT system, virtually no stock is held; that is no
raw material stock and no finished goods stock, but there will usually be a small amount of work-
in-progress.
JIT stock management methods seek to eliminate any waste that arises in the manufacturing
process as a result of using stock. JIT purchasing methods apply the JIT principle to
deliveries of material from suppliers. With JIT production methods, stock levels of raw materials,
work-in-progress and finished goods are reduced to a minimum or eliminated altogether by
improved work-flow planning and closer relationships with suppliers.
Advantages of JIT
JIT stock management methods seek to eliminate waste at all stages of the manufacturing
process by minimising or eliminating stock, defects, breakdowns and production delays. This is
achieved by improved workflow planning, emphasising quality control and firm contracts between
buyer and supplier.
One advantage of JIT stock management methods is a stronger relationship between buyer and
supplier. This offers security to the supplier, who benefits from regular orders, continuing future
business and more certain production planning. The buyer benefits from lower stock holding
costs, lower investment in stock and work-in-progress and the transfer of stock management
problems to the supplier. The buyer may also benefit from bulk purchase discounts or lower
purchase costs.
The emphasis on quality control in the production process reduces scrap, re-working and set- up
costs, while improved production design can reduce or even eliminate unnecessary material
movements. The result is a smooth flow of material and work through the production system, with
no queues or idle time.
Disadvantages of JIT
A JIT stock management system may not run as smoothly in practice as theory may suggest,
since there may be little room for manoeuvre in the event of unforeseen delays. For example,
there is little room for error on delivery times.
I. LABOUR
A. METHODS OF REMUNERATION
Fixing Wage Rates
Wage rates may be fixed by individual agreement between employer and employee, or more
commonly by collective bargaining between trade unions and employers’ associations.
An employer may pay wages on an hourly basis, per piece, or may adopt one of the various
bonus methods of payment, but the general principle of a wages policy is to obtain the maximum
production per RWF of wages paid while maintaining an acceptable quality of production, within
the limits of “social justice” (i.e. employees should receive a “fair day’s wages”).
In deciding on the method of remuneration to use, attention must be paid to the following
factors:
• The relative importance of quantity and quality, and the cost of spoilage.
• The degree of specialisation and standardisation of the product.
• The degree to which automatic or semi-automatic machines are used.
Main Methods
Workers may be paid by time of attendance or by results. The latter method provides an
incentive to increase production. “Payment by results” covers:
B. TIME RATES
At Ordinary Levels
This system is the most common method of wage payment in Britain. It is a system of paying
workers for the time worked rather than for work produced. It may be in the form of an hourly
rate, or shift or weekly rate for an agreed number of hours. We must examine the circumstances
in which it is most favored, and its advantages and disadvantages.
• Where the work done is very difficult to measure, e.g. when a service is rendered - nurses,
policemen, probation officers, lift attendants, teachers - or when the work cannot be
standardised, e.g. the majority of clerical operators or administrative work.
• When workers are learning, e.g. apprentices.
• Where the speed of the machine, operation, or process governs the speed at which the operator
can work, e.g. assembly lines, chemical plants, and process industries such as bottle or paper
making.
• When quality of production is of prime importance and would be endangered by encouraging
an operator to work faster.
• When safety is likely to be endangered if the operation is speeded up, e.g. lorry driver.
• When it is found that good employer/employee relations exist and a satisfactory output is
being achieved. The introduction of an incentive scheme may disrupt the good employer/
employee relations, causing discontent and possibly lower production.
• When work is so unstandardised that the expense and difficulty involved in measuring the
work done, etc. would be so great as to outweigh any advantages accruing from an incentive
scheme.
(b) Advantages
• The system is simple to understand and simple to operate, saving on clerical labour in
number and quality of staff.
• Wages are stable, an advantage rated very highly by many workers.
(c) Disadvantages
• The system provides no direct incentive to the worker to increase output or to produce better
quality work.
• It tends towards higher production costs because the workers tend to work at an accepted
minimum rate.
• It requires close supervision, and in times of full employment the worker’s output is greatly
dependent on his goodwill and conscientious attitude, since there is no fear of dismissal.
Clearly, labour cost per unit falls with increased production. This is illustrated in Figure20.
Figure 20
• An appreciably higher than average wage is paid compared with other factories in the area.
• A higher standard of output, both in quality and quantity, is set.
• As a vacancy attracts a larger number of applicants, the employer can secure the services of
better workers, who will be willing to maintain the higher standard in order to retain their jobs
and the higher wages.
(b) Advantages
• As with ordinary time rates, this system still does not provide incentive for exceptional
effort and ability.
• It requires close supervision.
C. INCENTIVE SCHEMES
General Principles
There are some general principles which should apply to all incentive schemes:
• The reward should be as nearly related to effort as possible, both in amount and in time of
payment.
• The scheme should be fair to both employer and employee.
• There should be mutual agreement to ensure that the basis of the scheme is fully
understood, covers all reasonable points, and is not capable of being misinterpreted.
• The scheme should be strong and positive; it should have clearly defined, worthwhile and
attainable objectives.
• There should be no limits placed upon the amount of additional earnings.
• The incentives should not be affected by matters outside the employees’ control.
• The incentive should be reasonably permanent, not merely a device to be used by the employer
when business is good and dropped when it is not.
• The rates for payment by results should be fixed only after the job has been properly assessed.
• Piece rates or time allowances, once fixed, should remain, unless conditions or methods change.
• The standard of performance set must be reasonably attainable by the average employee
and it should be possible to demonstrate that this is so.
• The scheme should be simple, capable of being understood by the workers so that they can
make their own calculations, and easy to operate with the minimum of clerical work.
• A properly prepared incentive scheme should assist supervision and help to reduce the cost
of it.
• The scheme should be in conformity with any national, local or trade agreement.
Under some incentive schemes the labour cost per unit will rise, but by increasing the output, the
total cost per unit will fall (again employing absorption costing).
You will note that the increased production in B has caused the fixed cost per unit and labour cost
per unit to fall considerably. In C the fixed cost per unit has again fallen, but because the incentive
scheme is in operation the labour cost per unit has hardly fallen at all. Because an increased
incentive is operating in D, the wages cost per unit has risen, but this is more than compensated
for by the reduction in fixed cost per unit.
D. PIECE-RATES
Advantages of Piece Rates
• Time wasted by employees is not paid for, although much depends on the cause of the idle
time and on the agreement in force in the particular industry.
• Each worker is paid on his merits, and thus individual effort is encouraged.
• The increase in production through the workers being induced to work faster causes a decrease
in the fixed expenses chargeable to each unit (in an absorption costing context).
• The employer knows in advance the exact direct labour cost of each job; this information
is invaluable when tendering for work.
• The workers tend to be more careful with tools and equipment when they know that any mishap
to these will reduce their own earning powers.
Disadvantages
For example, let us consider lifting potatoes. If there are 12 potato plants in each row, it
will not be difficult to dig up one row in one day, but if we are only being paid RWF2 per
row it will not give us much of a day’s wage. If we dig up 20 rows this will give us a
wage of RWF40, 21 rows a wage of RWF42 and so on. You will probably agree that to
dig another row after the twenty-first is going to involve considerable effort - much more
effort than the first row. Under a straight piece-work system, we are still paid RWF2
for the first or the twenty-first row.
MR. Taylor realised that the straight piece-work system gave no additional incentive to
workers for outstanding effort. He introduced the differential piece-work system, under
which a worker receives an additional bonus after he reaches a certain level of output.
Thus, in our example of potato lifting, Taylor might have introduced a rate of RWF3 per
row once the work has reached 25 rows. Once the figure of 25 has been reached, the
RWF3 per row will be paid for all the rows dug (not just for those after 25), thus giving a
very strong incentive to the worker to reach and pass the 25 figure.
In premium bonus systems a time allowance and not a piece rate is made for a job. The
bonus arising from greater production is shared between employer and employee. Compare this
with straight piece work where all the gains or losses arising from labour efficiency or inefficiency
are borne by the employee, while the reverse is true with guaranteed time rates, when all gains
or losses arising from labour efficiency are borne by the employer
Basic Features
The following points apply to premium bonus schemes:
• (c) above is probably the most important - it encourages workers and even learners to
increase efforts.
• There is a guaranteed basic wage.
• The system is reasonably simple to understand.
• The employer benefits by sharing in the saving of time, which may encourage him to install
time-saving machinery and improve methods.
• The system is suitable where it is impossible to measure production standards with a high
degree of accuracy.
• The system can be operated after very little time study and investigation.
Obviously, the more elaborate the preparation the more accurate will be the rate setting, but
this will increase the overhead costs. Being able to operate the system almost at once can be
a very important advantage.
(b) Disadvantages
• Employees often object to sharing the savings in time and it is difficult to explain or to justify the
principle to the workers.
• Incentive is not nearly as strong as for straight piece work.
• Direct labour costs increase at low levels of output when compared with a straight piece-work
system and even when compared with a guaranteed day-wage system.
To find the effective hourly rate, divide the amount earned by the time (number of hours)
taken to earn it.
Rowan System
This is also a premium bonus scheme. A standard time is allowed for a job and a bonus paid
for the time saved. The bonus is paid as a percentage addition to the time rate, equal to the
percentage of time saved to standard time.
b) T
Assume: Time rate RWF4 perhour
Time allowed 50 hours
Timetaken 40 hours
You will notice that, under the Rowan system, the worker is paid more than under the Halsey
system at levels of production just over standard; but the Halsey system gives the worker a much
higher incentive at high levels of efficiency.
(a) Use
Group bonus schemes are usually introduced where particular circumstances apply:
(b) Advantages
• The great advantage is that the group bonus scheme promotes team work. The bonus is paid
to all workers, i.e. not only direct workers but foremen, inspectors, internal transport workers,
tool-men, etc.
• It may encourage poorer workers to work harder, following the lead of better workers. Poorer
workers may feel that they cannot let their team-mates down and may therefore put extra effort
into their work
• Group bonus schemes are usually simple and fairly cheap to operate compared with individual
schemes.
• Mutual supervision is often exercised by the group members.
(c) Disadvantages
• Many employers contend that total output tends to fall because good workers have not
the same incentive to work as efficiently.
• The incentive may be lessened as wages tend to be more constant than in individual
schemes.
H. PERFORMANCE-RELATED PAY
In recent years many organisations have introduced remuneration systems in which the wage
and salary levels are based upon the performance of individual employees. These systems are
aimed at rewarding employees according to their performance, ensuring that those employees
who perform the best receive the highest rewards. Incentives are also built into the remuneration
system that motivate employees to improve their performance at work. Examples of performance-
related pay are:
Definitions
(a) Profit Sharing
The definition of profit sharing, as agreed at an international congress in 1889, is that “an
employer agrees with his employees that they shall receive in partial remuneration of their
labour, and in addition to their wages, a share, fixed beforehand, in the profits realised by the
undertaking”.
Be careful to note that the share in the profits is fixed beforehand and is not a bonus granted at
the discretion of the employer, although the agreed formula will usually define the limits which
will permit a profit share.
(b) Co-Partnership
Co-partnership gives the workers an opportunity to share in the profits, capital and control of the
undertaking.
Thus, the worker will participate in the profits of the firm in addition to standard wages. He should
be able to accumulate his share of profits in the capital of the company and, if these are in the
form of shares with voting rights, he will automatically share in the control of the undertaking.
A share in the control of the undertaking may also be secured by forming a co-partnership
committee of workers, which will have some influence in the management of the firm.
Methods
There is a great variety of methods used in schemes for profit sharing and co-partnership.
Circumstances differ among firms and consideration will be given to the following points:
• Capital employed and the division of profit between capital and labour.
• Labour employed and to what extent labour influences output and cost of production
Once the amount of profit to be divided among the workers has been decided upon we have a
problem, namely how is this money to be divided among the workers? A straight percentage of
wages would not compensate for loyalty, long service, etc. On the other hand, a person employed
for a few months has not contributed fully to the profits.
This brings us to the question of qualification for participation in the scheme, e.g. at age 21 or
after one or two years’ service are possible qualifications. It is important that the
qualifications are decided before the scheme begins - and agreed with those who hope to
participate in it.
• The most important advantage is that the scheme can be designed to reduce labour
turnover, e.g. double bonus may be paid after five years’ service or there may be a system of
increasing bonuses after every four years’ service.
• It does help to build up a team spirit. The status of the worker is raised, particularly
with co-partnership, when workers may have a little influence in management decisions through
their share voting rights.
(b) Disadvantages
• There is considerable difficulty in deciding on a basis for apportioning the profits as indicated
above.
• Profits fluctuate; therefore bonuses will fluctuate and may sometimes be zero.
• Workers in fact have little say in management policy. Although policy decisions may be best for
the firm in the long term, they may not be for immediate profits.
• Trade unions have been against such schemes, arguing that they weaken the trade unions, and
that share ownership is “an extension of the capitalist society”.
• The poor workers share equally with good workers.
• The scheme provides no direct incentive because rewards are too long deferred, i.e. paid
once, or possibly twice, per annum.
• Employees may not trust the figures given by management.
• The amount of profit is not controlled solely by the workers, efforts, and this makes
them suspicious of the scheme. For example, suppose the workers work at the same level of
efficiency in two successive years, but because the buying department makes a highly profitable
purchase, the first-year profits and bonuses are high. In the second year there could be a
trade depression and profits and bonuses will probably be non-existent.
• Workers share in the profits of good years but do not suffer the losses of bad years.
J. NON-MONETARY INCENTIVES
Purpose
Financial incentives aim mainly at immediate results, while the object of non-monetary
incentives is, in general, to build up output over a long-term period, by the following
methods:
Various Aspects
It is impossible to list all non-monetary incentives but you should consider the following:
• Medical unit in the factory staffed by trained nursing and first-aid staff and
possibly a doctor.
• Safety officer.
• Provision for private medical treatment.
(b) Canteen:
• Subsidized meals, ensuring that workers have at least one substantial meal per
day.
(c) Social:
Labour efficiency ratio = standard labour hours for actual output x 100
actual labour hours worked
Labour capacity ratio
This measures whether we were able to obtain more or less working hours than we originally
budgeted on being available.
Actual hours worked x 100
Budgeted hours
Labour production volume ratio
This measures whether we were able to produce more or less than we expected to produce based
on the budgeted hours available
Production volume ratio = standard labour hours for actual output x 100
budgeted labour hours
Example:
A company budgeted to produce 10,000 units and taking 4000 hours. During the period, they actually
produced 12000 units and took 4200 hours.
A ratio that is higher than 100 % is favourable. The higher, the ratio, the better. If it is 100%, then
standard labour hours for actual output are equal to actual labour hours. A ratio less than 100% is
adverse.
Labour capacity ratio = actual hours workedx 100
budgeted hours
4,000 hours
A ratio higher than 100% indicates that we were able to obtain more working hours than we originally
budgeted on being available. A ratio lower than 100 % means we obtained less working hours than
we originally budgeted on being available.
Labour production volume ratio = standard labour hours for actual outputx 100
budgeted labour hours
= 4,800 x 100 = 120%
4,000
A ratio higher than 100 % means we were able to produce more s than we expected to produce based
on the budgeted hours available and a ratio lower than 100% indicates we were able to produce less
than we expected to produce based on the budgeted hours available.
The method of calculating “man-hours” may or may not include both direct and indirect workers.
It is probably better, from the point of view of controlling labour costs, to include both.
Trends in this statistic need careful interpretation. For instance, if further mechanisation is
introduced, output per man/hour should increase. (The efficiency ratio would automatically
take account of such changes because the standard hours allowance would be adjusted on any
change in methods.)
An alternative to “output per man/hour” would be “output per RWF100 of labour cost”. This takes
account of wages increases: if a pay rise is awarded, output must increase if the “output per
RWF100” statistic is not to decrease.
Care needs to be taken in interpreting this measure, however, as clearly the proportion of
direct workers will fall with increasing mechanisation. There is thus no “ideal” ratio which can be
quoted.
L. LABOUR TURNOVER
We mentioned in the previous study unit that the various incentive schemes can help to
reduce labour turnover. Now we will study this topic in more detail.
Thus, if a reduction in the workforce were planned, e.g. by offering early retirement, the people
retiring early would not enter into the turnover statistics. In measuring labour turnover,
management is concerned to control the cost of having to replace those employees who leave.
Every new recruit must have some training. Training costs money, i.e. the time of another
operator who has to show the new beginners how to do the job; or the time of a supervisor or
training school.
Even after training, the beginner will be unable for some time to do a full day’s work equivalent to
that of a skilled operator with years of experience. The result is that the machines used by the
new recruit are underemployed, causing further loss.
The new recruit is also likely to cause more scrap and possibly break tools and equipment more
readily than a skilled operator. He or she is also more liable to accidents, causing further loss.
• Methods of wage remuneration, e.g. is skill being adequately rewarded? Does average
remuneration compare well with other local firms? Can workers reach an adequate rate of
earnings without a high proportion of overtime working?
• Have the employees confidence in the future long-term prospects of employment within the
organisation?
• Is there any antagonism on the part of the employees, owing to inefficient
management?
• Are there sufficient general incentives to encourage employees to stay within the organisation,
e.g. long service awards, pensions, canteen facilities, joint consultation, sports and recreational
facilities, etc?
Suggested Remedies
The personnel department can also help reduce labour turnover by developing and maintaining
good employee/employer relations. Joint consultation may be developed. Clearly wage rates will
be an important issue, as will opportunities for training and promotion.
Time Recording
The recording of gate times, i.e. the arrival of each employee at the works in the morning and
his or her departure in the evening, is very important. A number of methods are in use, depending
on the number of employees involved, and you must know the outline of these methods. If you
work in a large factory with the latest machinery you may feel that some of these methods are
old fashioned, but in cost accounting it is important to bear in mind that circumstances in different
concerns vary considerably and what may be old fashioned and cumbersome in a large works
may be the most convenient way of dealing with a small factory of 20 or 30 employees. You
must remember that the costing methods to be used in any business must be the most suitable
for that business, and not necessarily those which have proved successful elsewhere.
Try to inspect some different types of machine and system; make sure that you are fully
aware of the method adopted by your own employer.
Time Book
Here, employees on arrival write their names in a book which is ruled off at the time for
starting, late arrivals signing below the line, or alternatively the names are placed in alphabetical
order and each employee enters his or her time of arrival.
Note that the time book and disc methods record only the fact of early arrival or lateness and not
the extent of this, but they both have the advantage of being simple to operate.
N. INDIRECT LABOUR
In all works, some staff will be employed on servicing work, e.g. plant maintenance. Where an
employee is continuously engaged on the same type of service or indirect labour, a record of
his or her work may not be required since the total wages may be charged to the one expense
account. Where an employee undertakes various kinds of indirect work, however, it may be
necessary to keep some record of the manner in which he or she spends his or her time, so that
the labour costs may be allocated to the correct accounts in the cost ledger. A time-sheet similar
to that shown in Figure 27 may be used.
(From Study Unit 2 you will recall that direct labour is where the employee’s efforts are applied
directly to a product or saleable service which can be identified separately in a product cost.)
Name:
Sig. ..........................................................
Direct Indirect
Wages of Support Staff
Bonuses
Basic Pay of Indirect Workers
Basic Pay of Direct Workers
Cost of Idle Time
Overtime at Request of Customer Order
O. TREATMENT OF OVERTIME
It is not within the scope of a cost accountant’s duties to decide whether or not overtime working
should be authorised, but he or she must record the cost of such working, analyse the cause and
report the facts to management. Clearly, when a department has had idle time during normal
working hours and has worked overtime, this situation should be referred to higher management.
There should be a separate column on the pay sheets for overtime so that it is possible to obtain
the total overtime cost quickly.
For employees who are required to work “unsocial hours” it is now common practice to make
shift premium payments as an additional incentive. These are a particular feature of
operations that have to be run on a 24-hour, 365 days of the year basis and, eventually, they tend
to lose their free incentive advantage, once the employee has become used to receiving them on
a regular basis.
The underlying principle for charging overtime is: charge the cost to the cost unit causing the
expense. This may be illustrated as follows:
A. EXAMPLES OF EXPENSES
So far we have examined two of the components of cost, namely labour and material costs.
The third cost element is expenses, which comprises all items not falling within the other two
categories. Examples therefore include rent, rates, telephone charges, power, royalties
payable to an inventor, depreciation of equipment, etc.
The same distinction applies in the case of expenses, although there are in fact very few examples
of direct expenses. Royalties payable to the inventor of a product are clearly a direct expense.
Another example would be the running cost of a machine used entirely for one particular product;
in practice, however, most machines are used for a variety of products so their associated costs
are indirect expenses.
Interest on Capital
It may similarly be argued that the expenses in the cost accounts should include a notional
charge for interest on capital in respect of all manufacturing equipment (regardless of
whether money was in fact borrowed to purchase that equipment). Arguments for and
against this approach are as follows:
• Just as wages are the reward for labour, interest is the reward for capital.
Therefore an economist would argue that interest, as well as wages and other costs, ought
to be taken into account in calculating profit.
• False conclusions may be drawn from comparisons if interest is not taken into account. If one
manufacturer makes his own sub-assemblies while another buys them ready-made, interest
on the additional capital which the first manufacturer has tied up must be taken into account in
deciding which of them has taken the more economical option.
• Interest takes account of the time factor, which is of prime importance in production.
• Interest payments depend on the manner in which the business is financed. One manufacturer
may provide his own capital, while another may decide to raise loans. The manner of financing
does not affect the manufacturing cost but only the way in which the ultimate profit is distributed
(whether used to pay interest on loans or available for the owner).
• How should interest be calculated? Should the cost of fixed assets alone be used, or should
capital tied up in stocks also be taken into account? What rate of interest should be used?
Problems arise when comparisons are required between firms in the same industry and in many
cases production costs may be widely different.
• Inclusion will complicate the cost accounts and, if interest is included in stock valuations in the
cost accounts, an adjustment would be required in order to arrive at stock valuations for the
financial accounts.
The arguments against often outweigh the arguments in favour of inclusion of this interest
as an expense. However, when pricing a large order which the manufacturer will
have to finance for a long period before receiving payment, it is reasonable to include an
amount to cover interest on capital
There are at least two methods of calculating an annual depreciation charge in common use: i.e.
the straight line method, whereby the capital cost of the machine, less any estimated residual
value at the end of its life, is spread equally over the estimated number of years of life; and the
reducing balance method, in which a percentage of the remaining book value of the machine
is written off each year, so that the charge declines as the asset gets older.
In costing, we want to arrive at a level of annual charge for depreciation and find a means of
apportioning it (along with other costs) to the individual products or jobs. This is done by:
• Estimating the number of hours to be worked by the machine per year and dividing the annual
depreciation by this estimated number of hours, to arrive at a machine-hour rate.
• Estimating the number of hours to be worked by the machine throughout its life, and dividing the
capital cost, less any estimated residual value, by this number of hours, to arrive at a machine-
hour rate.
• Calculating a combined charge for depreciation and repairs, by dividing the capital cost less
residual value plus the total expected repair bill over the asset’s life, by the estimated
number of hours of use. The advantage of this method is that the cost charged in each
year of the asset’s life is the same - the rate does not rise with the higher repair bills which
will arise in the asset’s later years. However, this method may be impractical, since it is difficult
to estimate the total repair bill.
A better approach here is to use the reducing balance method. Indeed, some would argue that
this is one advantage of using the reducing balance method. Consider the case of a company
with only one large machine. It can use either the straight line or the reducing balance method
for depreciation. It is known that with each year of usage, repair and maintenance costs will
increase.
You will note that in these circumstances straight line depreciation plus repairs and maintenance
will rise each year, whereas reducing balance depreciation plus repairs and maintenance will
have a tendency towards equality each year. (The figures in the example have been chosen
to illustrate this clearly.)
“The total cost of indirect materials, indirect labour, and indirect expenses”.
This means those items of material, wages or expense which, because of their general nature,
cannot be charged direct to a particular job or process but have to be spread in some way over
the various jobs or processes.
We said earlier that a costing system must suit the business; it must suit not only the kind
of business but also the stage of development of the business. A costing system which
was suitable for a car manufacturer 20 years ago is probably not suitable now - because of
the changing relationship between direct labour and overheads and the enhanced information
demands to manage the business.
With automation becoming increasingly important, there is a tendency for overheads to increase
and for prime costs to decrease. The installation of new machines will increase the depreciation
charges and such items as service labour, while fewer workers will be needed to operate them
(direct labour)
Classification by Function
There are three main classifications of overhead: production, administration and selling, and
distribution overhead. These headings are associated with the three main functions of the
business organisation and we should, as a first step, attempt to classify overhead expenditure
into the appropriate categories. Clearly, there are certain items of cost which appertain to all
three, such as electricity, rent and rates, and it will be necessary to break these individual charges
down to the shares appropriate to the main headings.
These functions, and others, are not directly concerned with actual production, but are nonetheless
essential and may be looked upon as services to the actual job of production. It is the
cost of providing these services which constitutes the production overhead.
• Salesmen’s salaries
• Salesmen’s expenses
• Salesmen’s commission
• Advertising
• Samples
• Depreciation of delivery vehicles
• Carriage outwards
• Vehicle drivers’ wages
• Warehouse charges
• Office repairs
• Office salaries
• Depreciation of office machinery
• Office heating and lighting
• Postal charges
• Stationery
• Share of rates.
We must, therefore, prepare a periodical “expense summary”, which ascertains the total
expenditure to be charged to costs of production in respect of each cost centre. It is necessary
to improve the simple figures of payments made, by providing for expenditure incurred but not
yet paid and for expenditure paid in advance.
Example
Electricity bill of RWF800 per annum paid quarterly in arrears on 28 February (RWF250),
31 May (RWF200), 31 August (RWF100) and 30 November (RWF250). Rates paid in advance at
RWF2,500 (payable 1 April for full year).
As at 30 September the accounts will show:
E.OVERHEAD ALLOTMENT
Allocation and Apportionment
You should learn the following CIMA definitions of cost allocation and cost apportionment:
As an example of cost allocation, repairs to the building housing the raw materials store could be
allocated directly to the stores department cost Centre.
Those items which cannot be allocated must be apportioned. As the definition implies, there is
no single correct way to apportion costs. We have to use the most logical basis possible with the
data at our disposal.
Dept 1
Direct Costs C
O
S
T
A
L Dept 2
Direct Costs L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N ervice Centre
Cost Apportionment
You will find the following methods of cost apportionment among those used in practice:
• Light
The wattage used in each department can be calculated and the cost of lighting
apportioned to each cost centre accordingly.
• Power
The horsepower of machines in each cost centre can be established and the cost of power
apportioned on this basis.
Examples
Example 1
Here is an example of overhead allotment.
A company has two production departments, X and Y and three service departments, stores,
maintenance and production control.
Value of - 8 - 20 12 40
equipment
(RWF000s)
Number of 1 2 - 14 23 40
Extraction
points
STUDY
Machine Value 440 - 88 - 220 132
depreciation
CPA EXAMINATION
MANUAL
Power Electricity 550 - 20 - 320 210
Heat and light Area 80 3 4 1 30 42
Machine Value 40 - 8 - 20 12
insurance
Additional data is provided: the total number of material requisitions was 1,750, of which
175 were for maintenance department, 1,000 for Department X and 575 for Department Y. This
data will be used to apportion the cost of the stores department to these three departments.
Maintenance costs will be directly allocated to production control and Departments X and Y. (In
practice, a record may be kept of the number of maintenance hours needed in each department
to provide data for cost apportionment.) Production control costs will be apportioned between
Departments X and Y according to the number of employees in those departments (already
given)
Costb/ffrom
previous table
STUDY
costs allocated
Productioncontrol Numberof - - -1,961 784 1,177
costs re-apportioned employees
CPA EXAMINATION
MANUAL
TOTAL Nil Nil Nil 4,050 5,801
Examiners have been known to include direct costs in the list of costs, to trap the unwary, e.g.
costs such as direct material and production wages. If you are asked to allocate overheads,
ignore direct costs.
In the above example, some of the stores department’s cost was incurred on behalf of the
maintenance department, but not the other way round. When service departments serve each
other as well as the production departments (sometimes called reciprocal services), we must use
repeated distribution to apportion their costs to the production cost centres. An example
follows.
Example 2
A manufacturing company has two production departments (machining and assembly) and
two service departments (tooling and maintenance).
The expenses of the service departments are dealt with as follows:
(In the above exercise, brackets are used instead of minus signs.)
F. OVERHEAD ABSORPTION
Introduction
Overhead absorption is the allotment of overhead to cost units by means of rates separately
calculated for each cost centre.
In other words, when we talk about the amount of overhead absorbed by a product, we mean the
proportion of the total overhead which we estimate is appropriate to that product.
If all items produced by a department were identical, there would be no problem. We should simply
take the total overhead incurred by each productive department (determined by the methods
already described) and divide it by the number of products made, to arrive at an overhead rate for
the product. In practice, it is rarely as simple as that, for units are not identical. The following
are methods of overhead absorption found in practice:
Imagine, a manufacturer asked to make a million pairs of army boots. If the boots cost him RWF1
to make they would be sold to the government for RWF1.10, so he would have an income of
RWF0.10 per pair to meet general overheads and profits. If, however, he was a very inefficient
manufacturer, so that his boots cost him RWF2 per pair to make, they would be sold to the
government for RWF2.20 and he would have a sum of RWF0.20 to meet overheads and profits.
He had thus a very direct incentive to inefficiency and it is probably true to say that the need to
remedy this abuse was one of the powerful factors contributing to the development of the cost
accounting profession.
The only thing that can be said in favour of this percentage on prime cost is that it is simple and
requires little clerical work, but it would only be approximately true when materials used on every
job were equal in price, wages were uniform throughout (both for skilled and unskilled labour)
and any equipment used was employed equally on all jobs. As these conditions virtually never
apply, the system should virtually never be used.
• The ratio of wages cost to total hours spent on production may vary considerably where on one
job skilled men are using expensive machines, and on others a large number of unskilled men
are employed without much equipment.
• The slower, and therefore usually the more inefficient, worker attracts a larger burden of
overheads.
• Where piece rates are used, the overhead recovered per piece will be constant, although much
of this may have been done quickly by expert workers and the other part slowly by beginners.
Overhead for the period
Formula: × 100= Wages percentage rate
Wages for the period
Points in its favour are:
• It is simple and easy to calculate, especially where the costing system is rough and ready.
• More consideration is given to the time factor.
Occasionally a combination of both these will be in operation and a composite rate per production
hour may be used.
Hours may be either the number of hours expected to be worked, or the number of hours
which would relate to working at normal capacity.
This is a very satisfactory method, particularly where a production centre uses little elaborate
or expensive machinery, and when it may reasonably be said that every hour of direct labour
absorbs the same amount of expense. You must remember, however, that separate direct
labour-hour rates should be calculated for each production centre and that holidays should be
excluded, as should overtime hours, except when this is a regular recurring feature.
The “machine-hour rate” is defined as:“A rate calculated by dividing the budgeted or estimated
overhead or labour, and the overhead cost, attributable to a machine or group of similar machines
by the appropriate number of machine hours.
The hours may be the number of hours for which the machine or group is expected to be operated,
the number of hours which would relate to normal working for the factory, or full capacity.”
To find this machine-hour rate, it is necessary to estimate the number of hours of operation of the
machine or machines in the cost centre during the period under consideration. Allowance must
be made for idle time and for cleaning and setting-up time. The total expense is then divided by
the number of working machine hours.
As an example, let us return to Example 1 in Section E of this study unit. After the service
department’s costs had been re-apportioned, the costs attributed to the production departments
X and Y were RWF4,050 and RWF5,801 respectively.
Now suppose that Department X has five identical machines working 162 hours each during the
period under consideration.
The total number of machine hours worked in Department X is 5 × 162 = 810 hours. Therefore
the machine-hour rate is:
Suppose that the manufacture of an article takes four machine hours in Department X. It is then
passed to Department Y for hand-finishing, which takes six hours. Then the amount of overhead
absorbed by this article is:
In determining the total cost of the article, this sum would be added to the cost of the direct
materials, direct labour and direct expenses incurred.
In the illustration above, only one hourly rate has been calculated for each department. In
practice, fixed and variable overhead will, if possible, be kept separate, and a separate
absorption rate calculated for each.
• Some expenditure can be directly allocated to the particular machine, e.g. power, cost of repairs,
depreciation.
• Overhead chargeable to the production centre in which the machine is located, and not to
the individual machine, e.g. rent, rates, heating, is apportioned on the basis of area occupied.
Example
Using the data below, you are required to calculate a machine-hour absorption rate for
multi-drilling machine no. 5.
Solution
In addition to the costs specifically relating to machine no. 5, the following apportioned
costs must be taken into account:
Example
In a period in which 1,600 direct labour hours are expected to be worked, fixed overheads are
expected to be RWF20,000. In fact only 1,550 direct labour hours are worked and the actual
overhead incurred is RWF19,750.
The predetermined rate for absorption of overhead is RWF12.50 per direct labour hour
RWF 20,000 Thus, for instance, a job which took 20 hours to complete would absorb
1,600
RWF250 fixed overhead.
Because 1,550 direct labour hours are worked, the amount of overhead which has been
absorbed by the end of the period is 1,550 × RWF12.50 = RWF19,375.
Comparing this with the actual overhead incurred, we see that overhead has been under-
absorbed by RWF375.
WORK-IN-PROGRESS
RWF RWF
Direct material Transferred to finished
Direct labour goods stock
From the above workings, we know that the amount of overhead absorbed is RWF19,375.
Had the expected number of hours been worked, overhead absorbed would have been
RWF20,000.
To summarise: RWF
Fixed Elements
Other items are incurred whether products are sold or not - for instance, rent of showrooms,
salaries of salesmen. Such items may be treated as period costs and written off in the profit and
loss account or may be absorbed in one of three ways:
Cost 250,000
Absorption rate = Activity × 100 = × 100 or 10%
2,500,000
In this case, we add 10% of the sales value of the cost unit to the cost to cover selling overheads.
This method is useful when prices are standardised and the proportions of each type of article
sold are constant.
(c) Percentage of
Selling overheads for the year RWF250,000
Estimated production cost of sales for year RWF2,000,000
12½% of production cost of each unit is calculated and added to that cost.
Care must be taken in applying this method. For instance, suppose a company makes two
products, A and B. A costs twice as much as B to produce. Therefore, a percentage on
production cost basis would charge A with twice as much selling and distribution overhead as B.
However, it may very well be that there is a ready market for A, so there is no need to advertise
it, whereas B is in competition with others and the company spends RWF10,000 on advertising
B. It is therefore clearly incorrect to charge A with twice the overhead which is charged to B.
J. ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING
What is Activity-Based Costing?
The two traditional costing methods are absorption costing and marginal costing, as we have
seen. Absorption costing allocates and apportions all overheads to products. In order to do this,
companies must allocate and apportion service overheads to the main production departments.
Direct labour and/or machine-hour rates are then derived, which are used to calculate the
overheads attributable to each product. The approach was developed in the early part of
the 20th century and assumes that overheads directly relate to the level of production. This is
not always the case under current production methods, as factors such as sales mix, complexity,
range and production techniques all influence overhead costs. The method of apportionment
can also seem arbitrary and the resulting product costs are sometimes difficult to interpret.
Marginal costing, on the other hand, makes no attempt to apportion overheads and
a product’s marginal cost only includes direct material, direct labour and directly attributable
overheads. Sales less marginal cost establishes the company’s contribution, which should be
managed in such a way that it covers all fixed overheads and generates the required level of
profit. Critics of this approach point to the danger of not apportioning all overheads to products
and the possibility that these costs will not be recovered in selling prices. As a result, the
company may drift into loss and eventually go out of business.
Absorption costing requires a lot of time and energy put into the basis of overhead allocation
and apportionment but often the factors leading to the generation of these costs are obscured.
Marginal costing tends to ignore these fixed overheads and relies on budgets to control cost levels.
Activity-based costing provides an alternative approach to the treatment of fixed overheads. It
focuses on the activities that generate overheads and the factors, or cost drivers, that
cause costs to change. These cost drivers are at the heart of ABC and are used to determine
the basis of overheads attributable to each product. Attention is focused on each activity and the
factors that cause cost levels to change. In consequence, the nature of each cost will be better
understood and increased control and better decisions should result.
• Professors Kaplan and Cooper of Harvard University created the idea of activity based costing.
It was designed to deal with the problem of allocating costs to output where such costs are not
related to volume of production.
• In the traditional methods overheads are apportioned to output using a basis such as
machine hours.
• For every cost driver the cost per unit of activity is calculated and this is then used to divide
costs into individual cost units.
ABC concentrates on the activities which are essential in order that services are provided or
goods produced. All related costs are charged to the activity and each activity is itself necessary
for the final product to be produced. Examples could be:
Worked Example
One of the findings of companies that have used ABC is that high-volume production tends
to be over-costed, whilst low-volume, small-batch work is often under-costed. This probably
results from the additional overheads associated with short production runs not being adequately
reflected in the company’s costing system. Our example will therefore consider two products.
Product X is manufactured in long production runs, whilst Product Y has more components,
greater variety and is manufactured in small batches.
Product X Product Y
The monthly material costs and machine-hours can be calculated from the previous data, and
are presented on the following page.
Machine-hours
Product X 2,500 2,500 1,250 6,250
Product Y 3,600 5,400 3,000 12,000
6,100 7,900 4,250 18,250
Departmental % of total 33.4% 43.3% 23.3% 100.0%
Direct Material
Overheads Department
RWF000 Basis A B C
Production Department A 20 20.0
Production Department B 15 15.0
Production Department C 10 10.0
Purchasing 6 Material 2.4 2.2 1.4
Production control 5 Material 2.1 1.8 1.1
Tool-setting 12 Material 4.9 4.3 2.8
Maintenance 3 M/C 1.0 1.3 0.7
hours
Quality control 4 M/C 1.3 1.7 1.0
hours
75 31.7 26.3 17.0
94 F2.1 Management Accounting CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
The machine-hour rates are therefore:
Cost Machine-hours Rate
RWF RWF
Dept A 31,700 6,100 5.20
Overheads apportioned to each product under a traditional product costing system can be
calculated by multiplying the product’s machine-hours by the appropriate departmental rate. The
answer to these calculations is presented next.
Product X Product Y
RWF RWF
Dept A 2.60 3.12
Dept B 1.67 3.00
Dept C 1.00 2.00
5.27 8.12
This example has been simplified but is not untypical of systems found in practice.
Overheads are apportioned to products based on a machine-hour rate, which in this example
does not take into account the fact that Product Y is manufactured in small batches requiring
additional tool-setting, production control and quality control effort.
In order to keep this example simple, it is assumed that the production department overheads
are directly related to machine-hours worked. In practice it would be possible to divide each
department into a number of different activities, each with its own cost driver.
Overheads
RWF Cost Driver Rate
Volume
Production Department A 20,000 6,100 3.28 per m/c hr
Production Department B 15,000 7,900 1.90 “ “ “
Production Department C 10,000 4,250 2.35 “ “ “
Purchasing 6,000 1,200 5.00 per order
Production control 5,000 63,000 0.08 per part
Tool-setting 12,000 70 171.43 per change
Maintenance 3,000 18,250 0.16 per m/c hr
Quality control 4,000 13,000 0.31 per
inspection
Product X Product Y
Further Considerations
The ABC approach to ascertaining cost of production was introduced as an important
innovation in management accounting in the 20th century. It is a further development in
relating overhead expenses to production.
Over recent years, rapid changes in methods of production have resulted in direct labour costs
per unit of output being reduced. More expenditure is now indirect overhead not directly
related to units of production.
In marginal costing the only variable activity considered is volume of sales. It is established
that, at a certain level of production and sales, a breakeven point will be reached; the
contribution per unit thereafter is related to profit. In the case of absorption costing, overhead
costs are absorbed in the most logical way by units of production. Allocation and absorption is
achieved arbitrarily but as logically as possible. As overheads have become a greater proportion
of total production cost, any arbitrariness in how they are charged to products becomes more
significant.
In activity-based costing the overheads are considered to be related to the use made by production
of the facilities (cost drivers) responsible for incurring them. This is considered a more logical
way to obtain accurate information on the cost of production. The advocates of ABC consider the
following points in promoting this approach:
• It provides more accurate product costs, which should enable the management to make
decisions on pricing, most profitable product mix etc. in a more logical manner.
• It is argued that production resources are more efficiently utilised.
• It extends the variable cost approach to short-term and long-term costs and volume changes.
This is because these costs are related to the activities and not only to volume of production.
• Costs are considered in more detail as to whether they add value to production or not.
• In this way management can achieve better cost control.
• The management will have better understanding of the economics of production and of activities
performed by the company.
Although ABC is a better approach in relating overheads to production, it is still an arbitrary method.
It is in a sense an extension of absorption costing, as ABC product costs are full absorption costs.
ABC can be applied to all costs incurred in an organisation, not only production costs. It is being
used increasingly in service organisations such as hotels, schools and hospitals.
These cost units could be refined to reflect significant differences in the activities and drivers
relating to them. One hospital changed its cost unit on adopting an ABC approach. The initial
unit was a patient-day, but analysis of the activities necessary to provide a patient-day revealed
a range of activities falling into two broad categories: those relating to the nursing care a patient
received, and those relating to bed occupancy.
The latter category, such as the provision of ward cleaning services and patients’ meals was
mainly driven by the number of beds, and these activities were largely independent of the specific
types of patient occupying the beds. The nursing care activities, however, were driven by
the medical needs of particular types of patient. On the change of cost unit, every ward’s head
nurse rated each patient and arrived at a level of ‘acuity’ on a five-point scale. The ‘acuity’ rating
was the driver for the cost of nursing activity, and was used both in charging patients for
their hospital stay, and in preparing a flexible budget for nursing costs in each ward.
The solution in this instance of the hospital is compatible with the approach of a traditional costing
system - it equates to a manufacturing company changing from a plant-wide absorption
rate to cost-centre absorption rates. However, this does not indicate a general compatibility
between the traditional and the ABC approach in service industries.
A key factor in the ABC approach is the recognition of cost at levels other than the unit level.
The cost of making a bed available is largely a facility-level cost, while the cost of providing
nursing care to patients at a particular sickness level is a unit-level cost, i.e. it will increase as
the number of patients with this level of sickness increases. ABC and traditional costing result in
the greatest differences when cost drivers are batch- and product-related, rather than unit- and
facility-related.
In some service industries, e.g. public relations, the specific output may be difficult to
identify and quantify. Where there are multiple outputs, identifying support activities with particular
outputs may be even more difficult. Even strong advocates of ABC acknowledge that the costs
of applying it in such circumstances may well outweigh the benefits. For example, a hotel may
However, ABC can be very suitable for the service sector in identifying customer profitability
rather than ‘product cost’. Customer focus is vital in service industries - customers may
make very different demands even when using the same ‘product’. In some cases common costs
may be more easily identified with customers than products; e.g. a hotel swimming pool may
be used more by families than by business people, even though both types of guest are being
provided with overnight accommodation. An ABC analysis of customer profitability in service
industries may yield valuable information to assist management in, for example, price-setting.
While double entry cost accounts are generally to be preferred, you must remember that the
system has to suit the business and not the reverse. An elaborate system should not be
introduced merely for the sake of theory; the purpose of cost accounting is to provide
management with information.
We shall assume that you are familiar with the elements of double entry book-keeping, and the
arguments which show the necessity of keeping the financial accounts on a proper double entry
basis. The same arguments apply to the cost accounts. As in financial accounts, the golden
rule applies - “for every credit there is a debit” - and if you keep to this you will not go far wrong.
Main Classification
Accounting systems which are used for costs may be classified as follows:
An integrated accounting system avoids the need to open a cost ledger control account and to
reconcile the cost and financial accounts.
Figure 2 shows the accounting flow within an integrated system. If you compare this
flowchart with Figure 1 you will see that they are very similar. In the integrated system the
debtors, creditors, bank and fixed assets accounts have replaced the cost ledger control
account.
If you now compare the integrated system with what you learned about the financial ledger in your
Accounting Framework course, you will notice that the integrated system has dispensed with the
purchases account. The figure of purchases is derived from the creditors control account and
posted straight to the stores control account.
Question
ABC Ltd started the year with the following trial balance:
RWF RWF
Capital 100,000
Fixed Assets 30,000
Debtors 10,000
Stores 20,000
Work-in-Progress 20,000
Finished Goods 30,000
Creditors 20,000
Bank 10,000
120,000 120,000
During January the following transactions took place:
RWF
Raw materials purchasedon credit 20,000
Answer
* The asterisked items are the balancing figures in the accounts.
CAPITAL
Debtors
WORK-IN-PROGRESS
CREDITORS
Balanceb/f 5,000
FIXED ASSETS
40,000 40,000
Balanceb/f 10,000
FINISHED GOODS
10,300 10,300
COST OF SALES
DISCOUNTS ALLOWED
DISCOUNTS RECEIVED
DrCr
RWF RWF
Capital 100,000
Profit 4,500
Fixed Assets 30,000
Provision forDepreciation 300
Stores 10,000
Debtors 13,500
Work-in-Progress 30,300
Finished Goods 50,000
Creditors 24,000
Bank 5,000
133,800 133,800
Make sure that you understand all the entries used in this answer; once you have studied it
carefully, you should attempt the exercise of posting the entries given in the question.
If the accounts are not computerised, the work has to be sub-divided and, historically, this was
why separate ledgers evolved for the cost and financial accounts.
It is a form of specific order costing in which costs are attributed to batches of products. A batch
is very similar in nature to job costing, the only real difference being that a number of items are
being costed together as a single unit, instead of a single item or service.
Having calculated the cost of the batch, the cost per item of that batch can be determined by
dividing the total cost by the number of items produced.
Where an internal manufacturing order is raised for a batch of identical parts, for example
components to be used in production
Examples include a batch of bakery where items are cooked in batches or a batch of identical
teddy bears produced by a toy factory.
A cost sheet (or computer file) will be used to record the direct and indirect costs incurred by (or
allocated to) the production of the batch. This cost sheet is called a batch cost sheet. When the
products (or components) are finished, the batch cost sheet is closed and the products will be
transferred to stores or charged to sales at the average cost of the batch.
Research
Cost information will be required in the development of new products / improving operations
Batch production differs from a continuous production line because with continuous production,
the same product is made all the time (or for long periods of time) without interruption. However,
Batch production consists of a sequence of production runs, with a different product made in
each batch. The costs of setting up the production line for a new batch and cleaning up after a
batch has been produced can be significant. Batch set-up costs are charged to individual batches
where they can be identified and recorded.
EXAMPLE
Bookillbo Limited manufactures embroidered school uniforms. The following details are available
from the company’s budget:
An order for 45 school jumpers has been produced for St. Archibald’s Boys School. Details of
this batch are as follows:
Solution:
RWF RWF
Working 1
Service industries are different to manufacturing in that their outputs are intangible. However,
service outputs still have a production cost and the organisation must be able to determine these
costs in order to run the business efficiently.
It is important to note that no new costing principles are involved when moving from one type
of business to another. But it must be decided what are the relevant cost units and how the
elements of cost in materials, wages and other expenses may be analysed and classified in order
to ascertain the cost of these cost units.
At regular intervals, these cost sheets are prepared by the cost accountant to provide information
to management. The cost sheet would, typically, include the following for both the current period
and the aggregate year to date:
The data from these cost sheets are then used to provide cost reports. These reports are a
summary of the totals for the period and may be further analysed into fixed and variable costs.
• To control costs in the service department. This enables management to compare the cost
against a target (budget) and also to compare actual costs against previous period costs for the
department.
• To control costs of the user department and prevent the unnecessary use of services. If the cost
of services is charged to the user departments so that the charges reflect the use made of the
departments of the services, the overhead cost of user departments will be established more
accurately and may discourage excessive use of the service if that cost is significant.
E. EXAMPLES
1. Sunshine Hotel
The following information is provided for the month of June for the rooms department of the
Sunshine Hotel.
REQUIREMENT:
Prepare a table containing the following statistics, calculated to one decimal place:
= 200 + 30 x 100
240 + 40
= 82.1%
= RWF774,000
6,450
= RWF120
= RWF774,000 x 100
((240 x RWF110) + (40 x RWF70)) x 30 days
= 88.4%
= RWF5,000
(200 + 30) x 30 days
= RWF0.72
(vi) Average cost per occupied bed per day
= Total Cost
Number of beds occupied
= RWF100,000 + RWF5,000 + RWF22,500
6,450 x 2
= RWF9.90
2. DLN Limited is a transport company which operates a regular delivery service from its
warehouse in Kigali to a destination near Bukavul. The total annual mileage covered (including
100 outward and return journeys) being 18,000 miles per 10-ton vehicle.
For the outward journey, the vehicle is always fully loaded and in addition there is a regular
demand for return loads of 400 tons per vehicle per annum. The standard charge to customers is
24 rwf per ton/mile. The costs of operating this service are as follows:
The company is willing to pay a bonus to drivers of up to 30% of any additional profit for obtaining
additional return loads.
REQUIREMENT:
(a) What annual profit would be earned per vehicle without any additional return loads?
(b) What annual bonus would be payable to a driver who consistently obtained an additional
5-ton return load?
(c) What annual bonus would be payable if the additional 5-ton return load involved a detour
of 20 miles (on which no income would be earned) and a RWF2 additional overtime pay on
each occasion?
Return journey
(9,000 mile / 100 journeys)
= 90 mile x 400 tons 36,000
126,000 x RWF24 = 30,240
Overtime
100 journeys x RWF2 200
860
Net additional income 9,940
Bonus at 30% 2,982
Application
Until now we have been considering organisations with a cost unit which can be segregated,
and have direct expenses wholly attributed to it. Other types of organisation produce output in
which a unit cannot be easily separated, so that the output requires to be treated in bulk. It is
then necessary to use the technique known as process costing.
Process costing is applicable in the chemical, paint, carpet, food processing and textiles
industries.
Where there are several processes involved in the production routine, it is usual to cost each
process and to build up the final total average cost, step by step. The output of one process may
be the raw material of a subsequent one, thus making it necessary to establish the process
cost at each stage of the manufacturing operation.
The way to do this is to regard each process carried out as a cost centre, and to collect information
regarding the usage of materials, costs of labour and direct expenses exclusively attributable to
individual processes. Each process will be charged with its share of overhead expenses and the
procedure of building up cost rates per process or cost centre is carried out in accordance with
the rules given previously.
If further raw material is required at a subsequent process, it may be convenient to establish raw
material stores adjacent to the point of usage.
In many cases material may be used which is of low value, e.g. nails, and the volume of paperwork
required to record each issue would be prohibitive. In such cases the method of charging would
be to issue the anticipated usage for a costing period at one time, the issue being held for use at
the point of manufacture. A physical stock-taking at the end of the period would establish actual
usage of material, which could be compared with the theoretical usage expected for the output
achieved. With all such items the requirement is to maintain some degree of physical control
rather than accurate cost allocation.
Labour
Accounting for labour where process costing is in operation is normally straightforward
because fixed teams of operatives are associated with individual processes, and the
interchange of labour between processes is not normal from the point of view of efficiency. It is
often as simple as collating names on the pay sheets to establish the wages cost for a process.
Direct Expenses
All expenses wholly and exclusively incurred for one particular process will be given the
proper process number and attributed to the cost centre on this basis.
Overhead
The indirect material, labour and expenses not chargeable to one particular process must be
borne eventually by production. Absorption rates are used as before, and it is necessary that we
establish rates in advance for each cost centre. This means that the total overhead expenses
of the business must be estimated and apportioned to the processes in terms of the rules which
we have already explained. As we have seen, it is necessary to assess the output expected at
each cost centre. Then the absorption rates for the cost centres can be calculated by dividing the
costs associated with them by the estimated output per cost centre.
In this way we establish a relationship between overhead cost and activity. At the close of
each period the actual activity achieved by the cost centre is multiplied by the predetermined
rate to give the charge for overheads. However, where marginal costing techniques are being
followed (see later study units), overhead costs are not included but are dealt with in total as is
fundamental to marginal costing.
Conversion Costs
These are the costs of converting material input into semi-finished or finished products, i.e.
additional direct materials, direct wages, direct expenses and absorbed production overhead.
They do not include the costs of original new material inputs. The term “conversion costs”
is often referred to in examination questions on process costing and you should understand
what the term means.
Process I Process II
Direct materials used RWF2,000 RWF1,400
Process II 2,000
Process II used 9,000 units of Process 1 output
PROCESS I ACCOUNT
Units Unit Total Units Unit Total
Cost Cost Cost Cost
Overhead
Notice that both the “Units” and the “Total Cost” columns must balance.
RWF RWF
1,150 Absorbed: Process I 600
Actual expenditure
Absorbed: Process II 500
under-absorbed overhead 50
1,150 1,150
RWF RWF
Cost of sales 9,000 11,000
Sales
Production/overhead
Under-absorbed 50
Profit 1,950
11,000 11,000
RWF
Materials 2,000
Labour 2,700
Overhead 1,600
6,300
There was no opening work-in-progress. 1,100 units were introduced into the process. 700
were completed during January and the remaining 400 were:
Calculate: cost per unit, total value of finished production, value of closing work-in-
progress.
Solution
Note: “Equivalent units” or “effective units” are a notional quantity of completed units substituted
for an actual quantity of incomplete physical units in progress, when the aggregate work content
of the incomplete units is deemed to be equivalent to that of the substituted quantity of completed
units.
The idea of equivalent units is that 200 units half-complete are equivalent to 100 units fully-
complete, in terms of cost. In the above example we have different degrees of completion for the
different elements of cost. The meaning is that the units comprising the closing WIP have had
75% of the required material incorporated in them; this has taken 50% of the labour processing
time necessary to complete a full unit and the overhead content is put at 25% of that for a full unit
(e.g. the units concerned have had 25% of the necessary machine time).
The layout shown on the next page is recommended for all questions where percentage completion
is given.
Valuations
Total cost per equivalent unit = RWF7 (RWF2 + RWF3 + RWF2) Value of finished production
= RWF7 × 700 = RWF4,900
Value of closing WIP (ascertained by reference to no. of equivalent units for each category of
cost):
RWF
Material 300 × RWF2 = 600
Labour 200 × RWF3 = 600
Overhead 100 × RWF2 = 200
RWF1,400
PROCESS I ACCOUNT
Units RWF Units RWF
Material 1,100 2,000 Process II 700 4,900
Labour 2,700 WIP c/d 400 1,400
Overhead 1,600
1,100 6,300 1,100 6,300
WIP b/d 400 1,400
During the month a further 2,200 units were received from the previous process, valued at
RWF4 per unit (total RWF8,800). The following costs were incurred:
RWF
Materials added 5,060
Labour 5,450
Overhead absorbed 3,906
At the end of the month 400 units were still in process, completed as to: Materials added 90%
Labour 75% Overhead 80%
Calculate the division of costs incurred during the month between: completion of opening work-
in-progress, units started and completed during the month, and closing work-in- progress, and
draw up the process account.
Solution
The implication in this question, where we are told the percentage completion of the opening
work-in-progress (and can therefore see how much work remains to be done on it this month
in order to complete it), and are asked to show the cost of completing the opening work-in-
progress, is that FIFO is to be used. That is, we are to assume, for costing purposes, that the
opening work-in-progress is completed first, before any new units are worked on. (It does not
matter whether or not that is what happens in practice: it is a reasonable assumption to make for
costing purposes.)
The method is very similar to that illustrated in Example 2. Because of our FIFO assumption, we
can say that the output from Process 2 must be:
A finished this
B Total equivalent
units
2,200 2,180 2,170
Costs incurred this
month RWF 5,060 5,450 3,906
Overhead 50 × RWF1.8 = 90
RWF382
PROCESS 2 ACCOUNT
Units RWF Units RWF
WIP b/f 200 1,692 Transferred to
Transferred from Process 3 2,000 21,154
Process 1 2,200 8,800 WIP c/f 400 3,754
Materials added 5,060
Labour 5,450
Overhead 3,906
2,400 24,908 2,400 24,908
During March a further 32,000 units were introduced and additional costs during the month were:
RWF
Materials 110,800
Labour 33,650
Overhead 31,950
176,400
At the end of the month 30,000 units had been fully processed and passed to the next process
and 9,000 units remained in Process I, completed as follows:
Overhead 33 1 % complete
3
Make the necessary calculations and draw up the process account.
Solution
In this example it is impossible to use the FIFO method just described, because we do not
know how much work remains to be done to complete the opening WIP.
The average method is therefore used, in which the costs incurred in previous months on the
opening WIP and the costs incurred in March are averaged over the total number of units
processed (30,000).
1 1
(9,000) 100 9,000 33 3 3,000 33 3 3,000
A Total equiv. units 39,000 33,000 33,000
Costs incurred in
previous periods
(value of opening
RWF
Material 9,000 × 3.60 = 32,400
Labour 3,000 × 1.25 = 3,750
In practice FIFO is used when the costs do not fluctuate significantly from month to month, and
the average method is used where there are larger fluctuations.
The essential differences you will see between the two methods are:
• The equivalent units calculation under FIFO shows percentage of work required to complete
opening WIP, whereas under the average method, opening WIP and units fully processed
(started and finished) this period are grouped together.
• Under FIFO only one cost (the cost incurred this period) is used to work out the cost per
equivalent unit. The value of opening WIP is not brought in until later. In the average method
the value of opening WIP is added to the cost incurred this period.
• In Example 3, we were looking at Process 2 and consequently had a cost brought forward
from Process 1. By leaving this element until the very end of the calculations, no difficulties
were encountered. This element is slightly more difficult to introduce in the average method.
The best way is to have a four-column instead of a three-column layout for the calculation of
equivalent units, treating the units transferred from the previous process as “Material 1” and the
material introduced in the present process as “Material 2”. All units, whether fully complete at
the end of the period or closing WIP, are of course 100% complete in respect of “Material 1”.
This technique can also be applied to the FIFO method, and is illustrated by the following
alternative solution to Example 3 (using the FIFO method).
Completion of
opening WIP - - 20 40 40 80 25 50
(200)
Units started and
finished this
period (1,800) 100 1,800 100 1,800 100 1,800 100 1,800
A Units started this
period and in
process at close
(400) 100 400 90 360 75 300 80 320
B Total equivalent
units
2,200 2,200 2,180 2,170
Costs introduced
this month RWF 8,800 5,060 5,450 3,906
Cost per
equivalent unit
Division of Costs
(a) Completion of opening WIP - as before.
(b) Units fully processed this period:
RWF
Process 1 Cost 1,800 × 4 = 7,200
Process 2 Cost 1,800 × 6.60 = 11,880
19,080
(a) Scrap
Discarded material which has some recovery value and which is usually either disposed of without
further treatment (other than reclamation and handling), or re-introduced into the production
process in place of raw material.
(b) Waste
Discarded substances having no value.
Normal Loss
All loss, theoretically, is avoidable, and it can be said that inefficiency exists wherever waste
occurs. However, no factory ever completes its manufacturing programme without
producing some loss, so loss up to a certain level must be expected and regarded as normal.
Every effort must be made to reduce it to an absolute minimum by the proper use of
materials, machines, methods and effective controls.
The normal loss in processes is usually readily recognisable, and can be expressed as a
percentage of the total input of material. The cost of normal loss is borne by the process,
less any incoming credit in respect of the sale of loss. Where there is no sale value of the normal
loss, then of course in the examples which follow, normal loss value would be nil.
Example
Cost of process RWF2,000
Percentage of input regarded as normal loss 10% Value of loss per unit 25rwf
The process account will be written as follows:
PROCESS ACCOUNT
Calculations:
(a) Normal loss - 10% of input = 100 units
(b) Credit value of (a) above, 100 units at 25rwf per unit = RWF25
(c) Cost of normal output per unit = rwf 2,000 25 = RWF2.19
900
Examples
Example 1
Total cost of process = RWF7,385
No. of units input = 700
Normal loss = 5% of input
Actual loss = 40 units
Solution
Workings
Normal loss: 5% of 700 = 35 units
i.e. abnormal loss and good production are each valued at RWF11/unit.
SCRAP ACCOUNT
Units RWF Units RWF
Note (d)
Normal loss a/c 35 70 40 80 Note (e)
Cash
Note (b)
Abnormal loss 5 10
a/c
40 80 40 80
Solution
Calculation of cost per unit of normal output - as before (RWF11 per unit).
Abnormal gain and good production are each valued at RWF11 per unit. Value of abnormal gain
= 5 × RWF11 = RWF55
Cost of good production = 670 × RWF11 = RWF7,370
In the process account, the abnormal gain must appear on the opposite side of the account to
the losses. (It is like having an extra input to the process.)
PROCESS I ACCOUNT
Units RWF Units RWF
Input 700 7,385 Normal loss -
Abnormal loss 5 55 35 70
(scrap value)
Process II
660 7,260
705 7,440 705 7,440
SCRAP ACCOUNT
Units RWF Units RWF
Normal loss a/c 30 60 Cash 30 60
Credit the abnormal gain account with the difference between the actual output and normal
output at full cost.
Debit the abnormal gain account with the variance in units at their scrap value, e.g. 5 units at
RWF2 each = RWF10. These units and value are then credited to the normal loss account to
reduce the normal loss to the actual loss.
Debit the abnormal gain account with the difference in value between the abnormal gain at
full cost and the foregone scrap value of the gain, i.e. RWF55 – 10 = RWF45.
(b) This entry is transferred to the scrap account and represents the actual loss in units at their
scrap value, e.g. 30 units at RWF2 each = RWF60.
Example 1
Process No. 1
Opening work-in-progress: 300 units valued at RWF1,380
Degree of completion: materials 80%, labour 60%
overheads 40%.
During the month 4,300 units were introduced and costs incurred were: RWF
Materials 11,885
Labour 9,400
Overheads 7,540
RWF28,825
Normal loss = 10%, actual loss = 500 units.
Losses are ascertained by inspection at the end of the process. Scrapped units can be sold for
RWF1 each.
Closing work-in-progress 500 units;
Degree of completion: materials 75%, labour 50%, overheads 40%.
Carry out the necessary calculations and draw up the Process 1 account, abnormal loss/gain
account and scrap account.
The comment that losses are ascertained by inspection at the end of the process means that
we do not simply take 10% of input - the closing work-in-progress must be excluded since, not
being finished, it will not form part of the inspection.
PROCESS I ACCOUNT
Units RWF Units RWF
WIP b/d 300 1,380 Process 2 3,600 26,970
Material 4,300 11,885 Abnormal loss 90 675
Labour 9,400 Normal loss -
Overheads 7,540 scrap value 410 410
WIP c/d 500 2,150
4,600 30,205 4,600 30,205
WIP b/d 500 2,150
SCRAP ACCOUNT
Example 2
Process No. 1
Opening work-in-progress 1,500 units valued at RWF4,120.
Degree of completion: materials 70%, labour and overheads 60%. During the month 10,300 units
were introduced and costs incurred were:
RWF
Materials 13,945
Labour 13,250
Overheads 8,800
RWF35,995
Normal loss = 10%. Losses are ascertained by inspection at the end of the process. Scrapped
units are sold for 40rwf each.
At the end of the month, 9,200 units had been passed to the next process and 1,800 units were
still in process, complete as follows:
A
Closing WIP (1,800) 60 1,080 40 720
RWF
Material (450 × RWF1.50) 675
Labour and overhead (600 × RWF2.50) 1,500
2,175
PROCESS 1 ACCOUNT
WIP c/f
SCRAP ACCOUNT
Example
1,000 units of material, at a cost of RWF9,000, are input to Process 1. Normal loss is 10% of
input. Normal loss is discovered at the end of the process and has no scrap value. During Period
2, labour costs of RWF3,750 and overhead costs of RWF4,000 were incurred. Due to a fault
on one of the machines, there was an exceptional amount of faulty work, i.e. 250 units. These
were discovered half-way through processing. The material content of these units was salvaged
and will be re-input to the process in the next period. 150 other units were lost at the end of
processing.
Solution
Material Labour/Overhead
% Completion % Completion
Fully processed
units (600) 100 600 100 600
Abnormal loss (250) 100 250 50 125
Abnormal loss (50) 100 50 100 50
Total equivalent units 900 775
From the above descriptions of fixed, variable and semi-variable cost, it should be clear to youth
at producing one item less does not avoid any fixed cost or any of the fixed element of semi-
variable costs.
A statement of cost on a marginal basis will therefore contain only the variable cost, built up as
follows:
Factory x
Selling x x
Marginal cost x
The term“contribution”is defined as the difference between sales value and the variable cost of
those sales, expressed either in absolute terms or as a contribution per unit.
Contributions not profit, it is sales less variable cost.
RWF
Sales x
Less Variable Costs x
=Contribution x
A profit statement for the three products,A,B and C in our first example in this study unit, built up
on a marginal costing basis, would have been:
Fixed overhead
With this layout of the profit statement, management would have been able to determine that
Product C, whilst not the best product to produce ,nevertheless made a contribution towards
Covering fixed costs of RWF1,400. Note that itisthislostcontributionofRWF1,400which reduced
the profit figure from RWF10,000 to RWF8,600 in the first example.
At this point it is worth considering what is the best product to produce. By calculating the
contribution per RWF of sales for each of the three products, we can rank the mas to their relative
ability to cover fixed costs and generate profits:
Product A provides RWF 9,400 contribution from RWF 21,000 sales,i.e.RWF0.4476 per RWF1 of
sales.
Product B provides RWF6,700 contribution from RWF 18,000 sales,i.e.RWF0.3722 per RWF1
of sales.
Product C provides RWF 1,400 contribution from RWF 9,000 sales,i.e.RWF0.1556 per RWF1 of
sales.
Example
A company manufactures goods in three separate factories. The projected figures for the next
year are as follows:
There is a central office in London which is estimated to cost RWF154,000. Variable costs
amount to 75% of sales for each factory.
The marginal profit and loss account for this company would appear as follows:
Contribution to
RWF RWF
Period 1 Period 2
Production 24,000 18,000
Sales 18,000 21,000
REQUIREMENT:
(a) Prepare operating statements for each of the two periods:
• Where fixed manufacturing overhead is absorbed into product costs at the budgeted
rate and selling and distribution costs are treated as period costs.
• Where all fixed costs are treated as period costs.
You may assume that the selling price, fixed costs, and unit variable costs for the two periods
are in line with budget.
Solution
Workings
Stock figures
Period 1 Period 2
Units Units
Opening stock 0 6,000
+ Production 24,000 18,000
24,000 24,000
– Sales 18,000 21,000
Closing stock 6,000 3,000
Period 1 Period 2
RWF RWF RWF RWF
Sales 360,000 420,000
Opening stock (@ RWF15/unit) 90,000
360,000 360,000
Period1 Period2
The marginal costing statement relates profit clearly to sales: when sales rise, profit rises.
The absorption costing statement shows a lower profit in Period 2, despite the rise in sales,
because of the change in the stock position.
• When production is constant but sales fluctuate, absorption costing will cause fewer profit
fluctuations than marginal costing in periods when stocks are being built up to match future
increased sales demand (see the example in Section C).
• When sales are constant but production fluctuates, marginal costing will give a more logical,
constant profit picture.
• Since fixed costs accrue on a time basis, it is logical to charge them against sales in the
period in which they are incurred. The recommendations of SSAP 9 are for external profit
reporting purposes, but the internal costing system simply has to meet the information needs of
managers. The marginal costing system will also give a better indication of the actual cash
flow of the business.
• Under- or over-absorption of overheads is not a problem with marginal costing, and managers
are never working under a false impression of profit being made, which could be totally altered
by an adjustment for under- or over-absorbed overheads in absorption costing.
Further Points
It is important to remember that the difference between absorption and marginal costing
arises from the treatment of the fixed costs of production. As direct material cost and direct labour
cost will always vary with production, it is the overhead cost which creates the difficulties.
In absorption costing all the overheads are absorbed using various logical bases. It is
essential to prepare an overhead summary prior to a period, dividing anticipated overheads
into production and service departments. The overheads allocated or apportioned to service
departments are then apportioned to production using the most logical basis; an absorption
rate is calculated on the basis of whether the production departments are labour, machines or
material intensive.
In marginal costing, direct cost of production is calculated by adding direct material cost, direct
labour cost and overheads which can be related to one unit of production. By deducting this
marginal cost of production (cost to produce one extra unit) from the sales revenue, a contribution
towards fixed overheads from each unit of production is calculated. Total fixed overheads divided
by contribution per unit establishes the breakeven point. This is where all fixed overheads are
recovered and the business starts making contribution towards profit.
• In absorption costing the main difficulty arises in dividing overhead expenses between production
and service departments. If they relate to one department they can be easily allocated; but if
they need to be apportioned between departments then the most logical basis of apportionment
has to be established.
• In the case of a business producing more than one product, it is difficult to calculate
breakeven points for each product. The best we can achieve is usually to calculate an overall
breakeven point based on level of activity or total sales revenue. This again reduces the
usefulness of marginal costing.
Absorption costing is useful to management because it is easy to operate. Once the basis of
apportionment and rates of absorption are agreed, adjustments can be made annually to bring
them in line with the current situation. Marginal costing is very useful to management in
making decisions, e.g. on make or buy, levels of production, pricing of products.
In conclusion, both methods can and should be used by management - absorption costing for
the benefits it gives in cost accumulation and cost control, and marginal costing to assist in
managerial decisions.
Example 2
The following information relates to product J for quarter three, which has just ended:
RWF000
Budget 40,000 38,000 300 1,800
At the beginning of quarter three there was an opening stock of product J of 2,000 units
valued at RWF25 per unit variable costs and RWF5 per unit fixed overheads.
REQUIREMENT:
(a) (i) Calculate the fixed overhead absorption rate per unit for the last quarter, and
Present profit statements using FIFO (first in, first out) using:
(ii) Absorption costing, and
(iii) Marginal costing, and
(iv) Reconcile and explain the difference between the profits or losses.
(b) Using the same data, present similar statements to those required in part (a), using the
AVECO (average cost) method of valuation, reconcile the profit or loss figures, and comment
briefly on the variations between the profits or losses in (a) and (b).
Answer
(a) (i) Fixed overhead absorption rate per unit:
RWF000 RWF000
3,024
Sales (42000 RWF72)
Less Cost of sales:
Opening stock (2,000 RWF30) 60
Add Production (46,000 RWF52.5) 2,415
(W1)
2,475
315 2,160
Less Closing stock (6,000 RWF52.5)
864
Add Over-absorption
(W2)
Profit 891
Workings Per unit
52.5
RWF000 RWF000
Sales 3,024
Less Cost of sales
Opening stock (2,000 RWF25) 50
Add Production (46,000 RWF45) 2,070
(W1)
2,120
Less Closing stock (6,000 RWF45) 270 1,850
Contribution 1,174
Less Fixed overheads (actual) 318
Profit 856
Absorption 891
Marginal 856
35
Fixed overheads in closing stock
45
(6,000 RWF7.50)
10
Less Opening stock (2,000 RWF7.50)
35
The difference is due to fixed overheads being carried forward in stock valuations. The figures
under absorption give a higher profit because more of the fixed overheads are carried forward
into the next accounting period than were brought forward from the previous one. The fixed
overhead absorption rate depends on estimates of both production units and fixed overheads,
and actual figures may vary. The over- absorption of fixed overheads is adjusted for at the
end of the period.
Under marginal costing fixed overheads are treated as period costs and not carried forward in
stock valuations; under- or over-absorption does not arise. Marginal costing, by taking only
the variable costs, shows how much contribution is being made, and is regarded as giving more
useful figures for decision-making
RWF000 RWF000
Sales 3,024
Less Cost of sales
Opening stock plus production (48,000 2,475
RWF51.56)
Less Closing stock (6,000 RWF51.56) 309 2,166
858
Plus Over-absorption 27
Profit 885
The variations in the profits in (a) and (b) of RWF6,000 and RWF5,000 respectively are caused
by using different methods of valuation (FIFO and AVECO). The valuation method can affect
profit/loss for both absorption and marginal approaches, and could lead to much wider variations
than here.
Example 1
The variable costs of Product A are RWF10 per unit. The company has undertaken market
research which indicates that the likely sales at each of a number of possible selling prices
would be:
Selling Price
RWF12 RWF15 RWF20
(Selling price – Variable cost) RWF2 RWF5 RWF10
Example 2
DPS Ltd is experiencing a recession in trade. As a result, the Board of Directors is very
anxious to obtain all possible business.
A request for a quotation is received from RLY and Co. for a special type of machine. The
costing department of DPS Ltd has estimated the following costs for the machine:
Special jigs and other equipment required to produce the machine are estimated to cost
RWF100. There is no possibility of further use for these in the future.
You are required to calculate the lowest price which should be quoted for the order.
Direct material 30
Direct labour100 hours 25
Direct expense (special equipment) 100
155
Variableoverhead costs:
100 hours @ 50RWFperdirect labourhour 50
Marginal cost RWF205
The marginal cost of the machine is, therefore, RWF205. This represents the lowest possible
price and it may be quoted when the factory is being operated even though not covering fixed
costs, e.g. as a policy of keeping workers employed.
Normally an addition would be made to the RWF205, thus allowing some contribution to be made
towards reducing fixed costs. If working at normal capacity, the fixed cost content of the job
would be found by multiplying the number of direct labour hours by the rate per hour, i.e.
100 hours × RWF1 = RWF100.
In the circumstances envisaged, the company may perhaps attempt to recover half the fixed costs,
i.e. RWF50, thus making a total price of RWF255. However, this figure is purely hypothetical
in that the percentage of total fixed costs to be taken is determined by reference to the degree
of urgency involved. If there is no possibility of further orders then a low contribution should be
included to ensure that DPS Ltd’s price is competitive, giving them a good chance of winning the
order. On the other hand, if there is a reasonable possibility of further orders, a higher recovery
of fixed overhead should be attempted.
Example 1
A company manufactures articles for RWF6 each (variable cost) and normally sells them at
RWF10 each. Fixed costs are RWF10,000 per month. The firm is currently short of work - it
is only selling 2,000 units a month. It has the chance of an additional contract for 500 units a
month for four months if it will accept a reduced selling price of RWF8 per unit. Fixed costs will
not be increased if the contract is accepted. Advise the company whether or not to accept
the contract.
Note: Since the contract is for four months, the company would have to take into account the
likelihood of sales at the normal selling price picking up within that time. Obviously, if sales are
likely to pick up, the company would prefer full price sales rather than being tied to a reduced
price contract. But if sales are unlikely to improve, the reduced price contract is better than
nothing!
Example 2
A company manufactures articles at a variable cost of RWF5 each, which it usually sells for
RWF10 each. It has the chance of an additional contract for 600 articles at RWF9 each but is
unsure whether to accept, as fixed costs would be increased by RWF1,500.
Solution
Contribution per unit on the extra sales = RWF4Total additional contribution = 600 × RWF4
=RWF2,400
Example
A company manufactures articles at a marginal cost of RWF12 each, which it sells for
RWF20. It has been approached by a charity who would purchase 2,000 articles if a mutually
acceptable reduced price could be negotiated. Fixed costs are expected to increase
by RWF6,000 if the extra 2,000 articles are produced. What is the minimum price which the
company should quote for the contract?
Price-Fixing Policy
We have studied an example where marginal costing was used to establish a short-term price
(see Section F of this study unit). However, as already pointed out, such a method could not be
used for fixing long-term prices.
Where a total cost system is in operation, selling prices can be fixed by finding the total cost of
each product and adding on a percentage to give the desired level of profit. If marginal costing is
used, however, the percentage added on has to cover fixed costs as well as profit, and this makes
the selling price very difficult to calculate.
This is a serious objection to marginal costing for those businesses which do one-off jobs to
customers’ specifications, and where a price must be worked out for each order individually. For
businesses which have a ready market for their product, however, the objection is not quite
as serious. This is because in practice few companies are entirely free to determine their
own selling price. It is in part determined for them by the extent of the competition and what the
market will bear. They will lose sales if they charge much more than their competitors and/or
more than people are willing to pay. Therefore many businesses must take the selling price
as given, and concentrate on keeping their costs down in order to make a profit.
• Fixed expenses will remain unchanged over the relevant period. In the short term it may be
valid but over the longer term unforeseen circumstances may arise which will require additional
fixed expenses being incurred (e.g. renting of additional premises). This can create stepped
fixed expenses with multiple break even points.
• Selling price will remain constant. A drop in demand may lead to a reduction in the selling price
to maintain a reasonable share of the market. Some goods may be sold below normal selling
price to attract customers who will then buy more profitable goods (loss leaders).
• The contribution percentage will remain constant. This ignores economy of scale which
enables variable costs to be reduced. It also assumes that materials will be available at
the same price during the relevant period. The recent fluctuations in the price of fuel due to
political instability and regional conflicts are a very good example of circumstances, which can
completely invalidate break even assumptions.
• Only one product is sold. For multiple products break even analysis is very complicated
and assumptions are made that the ratio of sales of the different products will remain constant.
An average contribution is calculated. This assumption may prove to be inaccurate over an
extended period of time.
• Expenses can be categorized into variable and fixed. There are a number of grey areas and
different firms will treat some expenses as variable whereas others may treat them as fixed.
WORKED EXAMPLE
You will be aware of both types of costing, so we can usefully start by refreshing your
memory with a practical exercise. Try the following.
Question
Using the information given below, prepare profit statements for the months of March and
April using:
Answer
The valuation of units of production and stock will be different with each of the methods:
(a) Marginal Costing
All units will be valued at the variable production cost of RWF25:
RWF
Direct material cost 18
Direct wages 4
Variable production overhead 3
Total variable production cost 25
PROFIT STATEMENTS FOR MARCH AND APRIL USING MARGINAL COSTING
March April
March April
169 183
RWF000 RWF000
Less
Variable selling expenses 50 60
Net profit 79 83
Notice that the net profits for March and April together are the same using both methods,
RWF162,000. This is because all of the stock is sold by the end of April, and therefore all costs
have been charged against sales.
The net profit figure for March is RWF18,000 higher using absorption costing, due to
RWF18,000 of fixed production overhead being carried forward in stock, to be charged
against the sales revenue for April. (Stock = 2,000 units RWF9 = RWF18,000.)
Having reminded yourself of the technique, you can now go on to look at a problem that the
examiner might set. In which circumstances would you use marginal costing; in which absorption
costing?
Example
MC Ltd manufacture and sell a single product. Cost and revenue details of the product are as
follows:
Per month:
It is MC’s policy to maintain a constant production output at the normal capacity of 1,000 units per
month, despite fluctuations in monthly sales levels. Sales achieved for the months of January
to April were as follows:
Absorption costing
Marginal costing
You can see, therefore, that when production is constant but sales fluctuate each month, absorption
costing will cause fewer profit fluctuations than marginal costing. Managers could have been
caused unnecessary concern if marginal costing had been used because of the losses which
this method would show in January and February. With absorption costing, the fixed production
overheads were carried forward in stock to be matched against the relevant revenue when it
arose in March and April.
Example
Consider again the previous example of MC Ltd, and prepare profit statements using (a)
marginal costing and (b) absorption costing for January to April, based on the same cost data,
and the following activity levels:
For instance, the uniform business rate is likely to increase once a year or once every few years,
so clearly rates are not fixed for ever. However, within the year, they are fixed regardless of
the level of production at the factory. If, though, production increased so greatly that it was
necessary to acquire a new factory, clearly there would be additional rates to pay. Therefore a
fixed cost can only be regarded as fixed over a certain period of time and only within certain levels
of production.
Variable Cost
This is a cost which tends to follow (in the short term) the level of activity. Consider a
selling expense such as travellers’ commission. If the organisation makes no sales, no
payment or expense will arise; but as sales begin to rise from zero the cost of commission will
increase according to the level of sales achieved. This is an example of variable cost.
High-Low Method
The total cost for two different levels of output is:
The increase in total cost for the increase in output is first calculated. This is a variable cost.
B. COST ESTIMATION
Introduction:
Cost estimation may be defined as ‘a study which attempts to predict the between costs and the
activity level or cost driver that causes those costs. In practice, managers frequently encounter
such cost drivers (what is a cost driver?) as machine hours, number of transaction, work cells,
labour hours, and units of output e.t.c.
The cost estimating function is
y = a + bx,
Where
Y represents Total cost
a represents cost fixed component of the total cost
bx represents the variable costs component of the total cost
b represents the unit variable cost (this is the gradient of the equation)
x represents output level
This is the usual straight line equation you have been encountering in elementary
mathematics.
Purpose of Estimation
It assists in estimating the future expenditure (cost prediction) as the expenditure will depend on
the cost of the respective activities
• It assists in determining the net benefits anticipated in a specific activity based on the
relationship between projected costs and projected revenue.
Cost estimation is useful in business planning, cost control, performance evaluation and decision
making.
• Engineering method
• Accounts inspection/ Cost analysis
• High Low Activity method
• Visual Fit (Scatter graph) method
• Simple linear regression analysis
Example
Management has estimated frw1,090 variable costs, frw1,430 fixed costs to make 100 units using
500 machine hours. Since machine hours drives variable costs in our example, the variable cost
stated as
Then we get the total cost equation as
Y = ,1430 +2.18 x
Where y = total cost
x = number of machine hours
For 550 machine hours
Total cost = frw.1,430 + frw. 2.18 (550) = 1,430 + 1,999 = frw.2,629
This analysis should determine whether any factors apart from output machine hours are
influencing total cost.
A danger in using this method lies in the fact that many managers may assume a cost’s behaviour
without further analysis. This is because the method is highly subjective.
Total Variable Cost = Cost at high activity level – Cost at low activity level
Therefore,
Unit Variable cost = Variable cost = Cost at high level activity – cost at low level activity
Output Units Units at high activity level – units at low activity level
The variable cost per unit so calculated forms the ‘b’of the straight line equation mentioned
earlier. By substituting ‘ b’ into the equation, we can obtain ‘a’, the fixed cost.
Illustration
Based on performance, you have been provided with the following information regarding ABC
Ltd for the year ended 31 December 2019 :
Required
Develop a total cost function based on the above data using the high-low method.
Solution
Unit Variable cost = Variable cost = Cost at high level activity – cost at low level activity
Output Units Units at high activity level – units at low activity level
= frw.50,000 = frw.100/hr
500 hrs
Therefore b = 100
To get the fixed cost a, substitute ‘b’ into the straight line equation as follows:
When labour hours (x) = 800, service cost (total cost, y) = frw.200,000
Therefore from the Straight Line equation, y = a + b x
200,000 = a + (100) 800
200,000 = a + 80,000
a = 200,000 – 80,000
a = 120,000
Therefore fixed costs = frw.120,000
NB: Even if we used the 2nd set of labour hours and service costs, were would still get he same
answer i.e.
When labour hours (x) = 300, service cost (total cost, y) = frw.150,000.
Therefore 150,000 = a + 100(300)
a =150,000 – 30,000 = frw.120,000
Therefore the cost equation is:
y = 120,000 + 100x
This equation can be used to estimate or predict the total costs : for example, when the activity
level is say at 1000 labour hours, then the total cost would be
Y= 120,000 + 1000(100)
=120,000 + 100,000
= frw.220,000.
Visual fit (scatter graph method)
Cost estimation is based on past data regarding the dependent variable and the cost driver. The
past data on cost levels and the output levels) is plotted on a graph( called a scatter graph )and
a line of best fit is drawn as shown in the diagram . A line of best fit is a line drawn so as to cover
the most points possible on a scatter graph. Its intersection with the vertical axis indicates the
fixed cost while the gradient indicates the variable cost per unit.
10
9
8 x
Dependant
variable 7 x x x
(Total Cost) 6 x x x
5 x x x x x
4 x
3
2 xxxxx
x x
1m x
x2 x3
0 2,000 400,000
IndependentVariable
(Output Level)
Fixed Cost = X
0 = 1m
Note : Change in Y
Gradient = = Y3 - Y2 = Variable Cost Per Unit
Change in X X3 − X2
∴
Total cost equation y = 1m + 20 x
On the basis of the existing data, fixed cost is Shs 1m and the variable cost per unit is 20. On the
basis of the developed model, estimates can be made regarding future cost. When the activity
level is 600,000 units, total cost will be estimated as:
TC = 1M + 20 (600,000) = 1M + 12M = 13 M
• Regression analysis
It involves estimating the cost function using past data or the dependent and the independent
variables. The cost function is based on the regression of the relevant variables. The cost function
will depend on the relationship between the dependant variable and the independent variable. The
dependent variable will constitute the relevant cost which may be service, variable cost, overhead
BREAK-EVEN ANALYSIS
For any business there is a certain level of sales at which there is neither a profit nor a loss, i.e.
the total income and the total costs are equal. This point is known as the break-even point.
It is very easy to calculate, and it can also be found by drawing a graph called a break- even chart.
Let us assume that the organising committee of a dinner have set the selling price at
RWF8.40 per ticket. They have agreed with a firm of caterers that the meal would be supplied
at a cost of RWF5.40 per person. The other main items of expense to be considered are the
costs of the premises and orchestra which will amount to RWF80 and RWF100 respectively.
The variable cost in this example is the cost of catering, and the fixed costs are the amounts for
premises and orchestra.
The first step in the calculations is to establish the amount of contribution per ticket.
Contribution
RWF
Price of ticket (sales value) 8.40
Less Catering cost (marginal cost) 5.40
Contribution 3.00
Now that this has been established, we can evaluate the fixed expenses involved.
Hire of premises 80
Orchestra fee 100
Formulae
The general formula for finding the break-even point in volume is:
Fixed costs
Contribution per unit
For example, the contribution earned by selling one unit of Product A at a selling price of
RWF10 is RWF4.
RWF 4
C/s ratio = × 100 = 40%
RWF10
In our example of the dinner-dance, the break-even point in revenue would be:
rwf 180
3 = RWF504
rwf 8.40
The committee would know that all costs (both variable and fixed) would be exactly covered by
revenue when sales revenue earned equals RWF504. At this point no profit nor loss would
be received.
Suppose the committee were organising the dinner in order to raise money for charity, and they
had decided in advance that the function would be cancelled unless at least RWF120 profit
would be made. They would obviously want to know how many tickets they would have to sell
to achieve this target.
Suppose the committee actually sold 110 tickets. Then they have sold 50 more than the
number needed to break even. We say they have a margin of safety of 50 units, or of
RWF420 (50 × RWF8.40), i.e.
i.e. the dinner committee have a percentage margin of safety of 50/110 × 100% = 45%.
The significance of margin of safety is that it indicates the amount by which sales could fall before
a firm would cease to make a profit. Thus, if a firm expects to sell 2,000 units, and calculates
that this would give it a margin of safety of 10%, then it will still make a profit if its sales are at
least 1,800 units (2,000 – 10% of 2,000), but if its forecasts are more than 10% out, then it
will make a loss.
The profit for a given level of output is given by the formula: (Output × Contribution per unit) –
Fixed costs.
It should not, however, be necessary for you to memorise this formula, since when you have
understood the basic principles of marginal costing, you should be able to work out the profit from
first principles.
Consider again our example of the dinner. What would be the profit if they sold
(a) 200 tickets
(b) RWF840 worth of tickets?
BREAK-EVEN CHART
Information Required
(a) Sales Revenue
When we are drawing a break-even chart for a single product, it is a simple matter to
calculate the total sales revenue which would be received at various outputs.
0 0
2,500 10,000
5,000 20,000
7,500 30,000
10,000 40,000
(b) Fixed Costs
We must establish which elements of cost are fixed in nature. The fixed element of any
semi-variable costs must also be taken into account.
Let us assume that the fixed expenses total RWF8,000.
(d) The break-even point (often abbreviated to BEP) is represented by the meeting of the
sales revenue line and the total cost line. If a vertical line is drawn from this point to
meet the horizontal axis, the break-even point in terms of units of output will be found.
In this case, the break-even point is at 4,000 units, or a revenue of RWF16,000 (sales are at
RWF4 per unit).
Even so, the break-even chart is not a very satisfactory form of presentation when we are
concerned with more than one product: a better graph, the profit-volume graph, is discussed in
the next study unit. The problem with the break-even chart is that we should find that, because
of the different mixes of products at the different activity levels, the points plotted for sales
revenue and variable costs would not lie on a straight line.
• Break-even charts are only accurate within fairly narrow levels of output. This is because
if there were to be a substantial change in the level of output, the proportion of fixed costs could
change.
• Even with only one product, the income line may not be straight. A straight line implies
that the manufacturer can sell any volume he likes at the same price. This may well be untrue:
if he wishes to sell more units he might have to reduce the price. Whether this increases or
decreases his total income depends on the elasticity of demand for the product. Therefore
the sales line may curve upwards or downwards, but in practice is unlikely to be straight.
• Similarly, we have assumed that variable costs have a straight line relationship with level
of output, i.e. variable costs vary directly with output. This might not be true. For instance, the
effect of diminishing returns might cause variable costs to increase beyond a certain level of
output.
• Break-even charts only hold good for a limited time-span. Nevertheless, within these limitations
a break-even chart can be a very useful tool. Managers who are not well- versed in accountancy
find it easier to understand a break-even chart than a calculation showing the break-even point.
Figure 2
Example
A long-distance coach company expects 80,000 tickets to be sold on a particular route in a
three-month period at a price of RWF30 each. Fixed overhead for the period is budgeted at
RWF412,500 and expected net profit is RWF247,500.
REQUIREMENT:
Calculate:
(a) the contribution/sales ratio;
(b) the total contribution;
Solution
(a) The contribution must first be calculated.
Fixed costs + Profit: RWF412,500 + RWF247,500 = RWF660,000. Contribution/sales ratio
rwf 660,000
× 100 = 27.5%
80,000 tickets RWF 30
(b) Total contribution = RWF660,000.
(c) Contribution per ticket: this is the total contribution divided by the number of tickets to be
sold
RWF 660,000
80,000 = RWF8.25
(d) Additional profit arising from selling a further 1,250 tickets: as the company is already
trading at above its break-even point, any additional contribution earned by additional
sales will be profit.
The additional profit is 1,250 × RWF8.25 = RWF10,312.50
(e) The additional sales required to produce a profit of RWF247,500 if the selling price per
ticket is reduced to RWF27.75 is calculated as follows:
Fixed costs remain the same. Therefore the reduction in selling price reduces
contribution by the same amount:
RWF30 – RWF27.75 = RWF2.25. This reduces contribution per ticket from RWF8.25 to RWF6.00.
To earn a target profit of RWF660,000, sales must now be
rwf 660,000
rwf 6 = 110,000.
This means that an additional number of 30,000 (110,000 – 80,000) tickets must be sold.
Example
Variable costs RWF2 per unit
Figure 4
In this graph, sales revenue is plotted on the horizontal axis, against profit/loss on the vertical
axis. It is therefore necessary to work out the profit before starting to plot the graph. This is done
using the marginal costing equation.
Sales revenue – Variable cost = Fixed cost + Profit
Figure 6
The distance AO on the graph represents the amount of fixed cost, since when no sales are
made there will be a loss equal to the fixed cost.
The graph is easiest to draw and interpret if the products are taken in order, starting with the most
profitable and working back to the least profitable, “profitability” in this context being measured by
the relationship which contribution bears to sales revenue.
Example
The Works Director of XY Ltd, a company manufacturing and marketing a number of
different products, considers that the profit could be increased by restricting the number of
products. He wishes to eliminate production of the two lines which contribute
proportionately least, and he is satisfied that the output and sale of the remaining products would
be increased proportionately so that the total value of sales is unaffected.
He asks you to help him by preparing from the following data a suitable graph which would
indicate the products which should be eliminated, and would assist him in presenting his point
of view to his colleagues on the Board.
Solution
The first step is to establish the contribution made towards fixed expenses by the individual
products. The second is to calculate the contribution as a percentage of sales revenue. At
this stage we will be able to eliminate the least profitable lines.
It is clear that A and C are proportionately the two least profitable products, and should be
eliminated.
Since the question states that the total value of sales will remain the same, we must gross up
the sales of the remaining items.
Revised
Basis
Product Sales Contribution Profit
(Contribution Less
Fixed Costs)
RWF RWF RWF
E 30,440 22,500 –11,000
D 58,220 29,750
88,660 52,250 +18,750
F 13,230 2,650
101,890 54,900 +21,400
B 29,110 5,300
Example
Calculate the contribution: sales (C/S) ratio from the following information:
Sales Figures Profit Figures
RWF RWF
3,500 625
Activity Level I
Activity Level II 3,000 500
This figure can be checked by drawing up profit statements for the two activity levels, bearing
in mind that if the ratio is 0.25, i.e. contribution is 0.25 per RWF of sales, then variable costs
will be 0.75 per RWF of sales. We must also remember that fixed cost = contribution – profit,
and that the fixed cost will by definition be the same at each of the two activity levels.
Level I Level II
RWF RWF
Sales 3,500 3,000
Less marginal cost (0.75 per RWF1) 2,625 2,250
Contribution 875 750
Less fixed expenses 250 250
Profits 625 500
(b) Demonstrate the relationship between a firm’s contribution/sales ratio, its percentage
margin of safety, and its profit/sales ratio.
(c) What is the significance of a firm’s margin of safety?
(d) The following details relate to Product X:
During the forthcoming year it is expected that material costs will increase by 10%, wages by
1
33 3 % and other costs by 20%.
You are required to calculate the percentage increase in the selling price of X which would
maintain the firm’s contribution/sales ratio.
Solution
(a) (i) The contribution/sales ratio is the contribution that is sales revenue - variable
cost, expressed as a proportion of sales.
For example, if selling price = RWF100 and variable cost/unit = RWF75, the
contribution/unit is RWF25 and the C/S ratio 0.25 or 25%.
(ii) The margin of safety is the difference between a firm’s actual or expected sales,
and the sales which would be needed to break even. It may be expressed as
a percentage of the actual sales.
For example, using the data above and supposing fixed costs to be RWF2,500, the sales
2,500
volume required to break even would be 100 units ( ).
If the firm’s actual sales were 200 units, its margin25of safety would be 100 units or
100
200 × 100% = 50%.
(b) A firm’s profit/sales ratio can be obtained by applying its percentage margin of safety to
its C/S ratio. This is illustrated using the above data:
RWF
Since current sales revenue is RWF120 per unit, the current C/S ratio is 40/120 or
1 2
33 3 %. The variable cost: sales ratio is 66 3 %.
If the C/S ratio is to remain the same, the variable cost : sales ratio will also remain the same,
2
i.e. 66 3 % of the new selling price is RWF92. Therefore the new selling price must be
RWF138
92
( × 100).
66 2 3
RWF
The two most important points to notice about this part of the question are:
• The examiner gave the fixed cost per unit as a “red herring”. In marginal costing we are only
interested in the fixed costs in total; fixed cost per unit is relevant only to absorption costing.
As it transpired, in this question we did not need any information at all about fixed costs.
• The variable (marginal) cost to sales ratio and the contribution to sales ratio are complementary
ratios, i.e. when expressed as percentages they add up to 100%, and if one of them remains
constant, then so does the other.
For decision making purposes information is required which is relevant to the particular decision
under consideration. In all decisions there must be a “status quo” (or position the decision
making entity will be in if no decision is taken) and an alternative position (or several
alternative positions) which will result as a direct consequence of the decision to be taken.
Relevant information is that which relates to the differences between the basic, or status
quo outcome and the alternatives. Therefore the decision should be appraised by making a
comparison of the financial effects between the two sets of outcomes. Information concerning
events which are common to all outcomes possibilities may be ignored as such events are not
decision variables. The decision variables are not to be measured by the historic costs utilised
in regular management accounting reports as the historic costs relate to past transactions and
not, therefore, decision variables for the purpose of any current decision. Past transactions
are common to all future or current actions and as such are events which are common to all
outcomes hence they may be ignored. Relevant information concerns future incremental
(or avoidable) costs and revenues (as these can be altered by the current decisions) as well as
current opportunity values of existing assets.
Hence the figures incorporated in regularly produced management accounting reports are
generally based on past actions and are not to be used for decision making which is
concerned with current and future alternative actions. However, frequently, the figures used in
the regularly produced statements will be a good first approximation for the values which should
be attributed to the relevant decision variables – but this cannot be relied upon to be always the
case.
The decision may not simply be for tangible products but could be a service facility e.g. sub
contract out computer services of use own personnel. Regardless of the type of make-buy
decisions the analytical process is the same. Managers attempt to isolate the costs relevant to
the decision at hand.
To illustrate let us assume, KA Tractors Limited manufacture a line of garden tractors. Currently
the company purchases sub-assemblies for RWF80 a unit which is expected to rise to RWF90
next year. The company is currently operating at 70% capacity and has the ability to manufacture
the sub-assemblies itself. This would incur additional leasing costs of RWF25,000 per annum.
Current requirements are 5,000 units.
RWF
Direct material 25
Direct labour 30
Variable overhead 20
Additional fixed overhead 5
Allocated fixed overhead 12
2 RWF10,000
Manufacturing appears to cost RWF2 more per unit. However the figures contain costs which are
not relevant to the decision i.e. allocated fixed overhead RWF12 which will be incurred whether
manufactured or purchased. These SUNK COSTS should be disregarded because they are
already committed and the decision will not alter them.
The relevant cost is only RWF92 - RWF12 = RWF80 and the company can save
RWF10 a unit by manufacturing.
However let us assume that the company is operating at full capacity and therefore by producing
the sub assemblies it will have to forego the use of the space for alternative production. This
alternative may be to produce engine blocks selling at a contribution (i.e. Sales less variable cost
of manufacturing) of RWF15 per unit. The decision will therefore be altered so it is better to earn
a contribution of RWF15 rather than save RWF10 and thus the company should sub-contract out.
The alternative income of the engine blocks are known as the OPPORTUNITY COSTS of
the manufacturing decision.
Let us examine AG. Brewing Limited which produces 2 joint products lager and beer and we
use 2 of the most common methods of joint cost allocation i.e. physical units and gross profit
methods. The schedule of total product costs is as follows: -
Physical Units Method
We can now assume a competitor SUPERBEER comes on to the market at RWF32.50. What
decision do we make as the physical units methods says we should continue in production
whereas the gross profit method leaves us with a closure decision as the cost of RWF35 exceed
revenue by RWF2.50 per unit. Which is correct?
The answer lies in disregarding the joint costs as they are SUNK and are committed anyway. The
relevant cost is the costs incurred after split off of RWF120,000 or RWF12 per gallon produced
and compare this with the additional (incremental) income generated of RWF32.5 therefore the
company should continue production. A contribution of RWF20.5 is earned towards recovering the
joint costs which represents increased profit of RWF205,000 from the alternative of discontinuing
the line.
Taking this further let us assume that lager can be sold for RWF10 a gallon without processing
beyond the split off point. Revenue falls by RWF10 and costs by RWF3.60 (RWF180,000 ÷
50,000 gallons). Since loss in revenue exceeds costs saved by RWF6.40 the decision must
be to continue the product to completion as there would be an overall fall of RWF320,000 in the
years profits.
However if instead we can assume that Beer can be sold for RWF27.50 at split off or at RWF32.50
on full completion then the fall in income at split off is only RWF5 a gallon compared with cost
savings of RWF12 (RWF120,000 ÷ 10,000 gallons). A net saving of RWF7 a gallon would result
increasing profits by RWF70,000.
Joint costs become relevant when an alternative is to discontinue production of all the joint
products in the group. For example the company may have a target gross profit on its joint
products of say 25% then the following are the relevant costs: -
RWF
1,381,250
*Sales 1,325,000
Shortfall (56,250)
RWF1,325,000
Let us assume the CL Toy Co is currently operating at only 60% capacity. A national toy company
approaches the company with a proposal that the firm should produce
200,000 assorted toys at RWF7 each (normal price RWF10).
It would appear that the company would lose RWF1 for each toy sold but manufacturing
overhead is already “sunk” therefore it cannot be relevant to the decision being taken. The
additional costs are only RWF6 and therefore each unit sold will make a positive RWF1
contribution towards recovery of fixed overheads and towards profits.
However it would be wrong simply to judge the special order on its quantitative merits along.
There are a number of side effects which should be carefully considered in conjunction with the
above?
• Will acceptance result in further orders from this customer and if I charge this price of
RWF7 am I stuck to it?
• What effect will this reduced price have on other customers. Will they demand price
decreases or are they likely to turn elsewhere for their business?
• By accepting the special order could I be losing out on other more profitable work elsewhere?
• How long will this spare capacity last?
These are just a few of the problems created by this decision and these may very well in the
end outweigh the financial advantages computed as per above.
The contribution approach supplies the data for a proper decision, because the decision is
determined by the product that makes the largest total contribution to profit. The objective
is to maximise total profits which depend on getting the highest contribution margin per unit of
the constraining factor.
It follows
A B
Units per hour 3 1
Contribution Margin per hour 9 6
Product A should be produced because it contributes the greater contribution per hour. We can
prove this by calculating the profits under both decisions: -
Product A
A is clearly the better product to produce despite the fact that each unit is only earning half that of
product B. However, the important factor is that product A takes ⅓ of the time to produce as B and
therefore with a limiting factor of 1000 hours this outweighs any contribution/unit disadvantage.
A B
.41 .39
Contribution .59 .81
Very often where labour is the constraining factor one is asked to indicate possible methods of
providing the estimated missing productive capacity which would include the following:
The various reasons for adding or discontinuing products to a company’s range are usually to
increase profits or reduce the losses. Provided that no fixed investment is required then the
incremental analysis should provide a solution.
Let us assume that the firm has spare capacity. An opportunity arises for regular turnover
of 10,000 units/month of a new product “x” at a price of RWF1 each. No investment is
required. If we assume material and labour to cost 75rwf per unit, additional fixed overheads to
cost RWF1,500 per annum then provided there are no better alternatives available the project
should go ahead: -
If facilities were not idle and there were other possibilities then in addition to the above costs
OPPORTUNITY COSTS should be considered.
In relation to the decision to discontinue a product the only relevant costs are those which are
AVOIDABLE as a result of the decisions. For example a product profitability report could
well look as follows: -
RWF RWF
Sales 2,500
Variable costs 2,000
(f) Pricing
Pricing Decisions: Long Run And Short Run
Pricing a product is one of the most difficult areas for management decision. There are basically
two aspects of the problem: -
In many firms today the pricing policy is quite often simply to add a margin to total cost giving a
sales figure. This COST PLUS PRICING can be seriously in error for it fails to take into account
the effect of that decision on sales volume. It may be possible to reduce prices and increase
profits if the volume is sufficiently elastic in relation to price changes or it may not affect volume
When comparing the effect on unit sales of varying prices what is critical is the contribution
margin since fixed costs are unaffected by volume changes. The aim of contribution pricing is to
maximise contribution and therefore profits at the same time.
Example
CP Limited prices products at cost plus 50%. Its cost structure and current activity level
are as follows: -
Market research indicates that a 10% price reduction would increase sales volume by 25%. A
contribution approach to the pricing problem clearly shows that profit is higher after the price
change than before.
• Fixed costs are only fixed within the RELEVANT RANGE OF ACTIVITY. Once
outside this range then we must take account of the impact of the pricing decision on fixed
costs. (Example below illustrates this point in a short run context.)
• In the long run all costs will vary.
These two dangers should lead to caution in using a rigid classification of costs.
• By concentrating on contribution management could lose sight of the long term problem of
covering fixed costs. This often happens when management allow a short run price
which slightly exceeds marginal cost to become the long run price. (See (c) Special Orders
above).
Example:
AY Limited is a manufacturing company. At present it is operating at 60% level of activity at which
level its sales (at RWF20 per unit) are RWF120,000.
Fixed costs amount to RWF50,000 but it is estimated that to achieve 80% - 90%
activity level would cause fixed costs to increase by RWF10,000.
The sales manager of the company has proposed that the price of the product should be reduced
by 25% so as to reach a wider sales market. As a result the board of directors require a statement
showing:
• The operating profit of the company at activity levels of 60%, 70%, 80% and 90% assuming:
• No change in price is effected
• A reduction in selling price of 25% is effected and
• The percentage increase on present output which will be required to maintain the
present profit if the company reduces the selling price.
Activity level 60% 70% 80% 90% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Sales units 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000
Fixed Costs 50,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 60,000
(RWF)
The production would have to be increased by 3,000 units. Unfortunately, this represents 90%
activity level at which level (in fact any level above80%) fixed costs are increased by RWF10,000
thus reducing profit by the same amount. Therefore, to maintain its existing profit level, the company
must cover this extra RWF10,000 by increased contribution from extra units produced.
Increased Fixed Costs 10,000
i.e. = 1,000 units
Contribution per unit 10
The conclusion should not be reached that all variable costs are relevant and that all fixed
costs are irrelevant. This approach over-simplifies the problem as all costs become variable in
the long run.
Certain costs may be variable but because of the nature of the decision to be made become
irrelevant. Furthermore fixed costs are often affected by a decision. For example the
decision to buy (or not to buy) a second car is usually influenced by the fixed costs that go with
the second car.
If the length of time under consideration is long enough no cost is fixed. Yet decisions often have
to be made in conditions where the length of time is short enough for costs to be fixed.
Fixed costs should therefore, be considered when they are expected to be altered either
immediately or in the future by the decision at hand.
In particular a businessman with a high variable cost is vulnerable to price competition from
competitors who have a low variable cost per unit. They will still be generating a
contribution at a price below his variable cost, so that he must sell each unit at a gross loss to
compete.
However in conditions of low demand for the product where the price is maintained (i.e.
where price reductions will not generate increased demand) the business with the low
variable costs and high fixed costs will fare worse. This is because volume shortfalls at a
high contribution per unit have a greater impact on profit than at a low contribution per unit. The
business with the low variable cost will usually have high fixed costs with the result that volume
shortfalls quickly give rise to losses.
Example
Two businesses, A Limited and B Limited, sell the same type of product in
st the same type of
market. Their budgeted Profit and Loss Accounts for the year ending 31 December 19X6
are as follows:
Let us examine a simple department store with 3 departments whose results are as follows:
Total Groceries Hardware Furniture
At first glance we should close down the grocery departments as there is a loss of RWF1,000.
However this assumes that all RWF21,000 of fixed costs will be save. This is unlikely as there
are a number of COMMON COSTS which have been apportioned to all 3 products.
As well as that there are a number of other considerations: -
• Will I have customers for my other two departments if I close groceries down i.e. groceries
are a loss leader.
• Are there alternatives for other new departments which might make a larger
contribution.
• Could I expand on hardware and furniture in the space now occupied by groceries and earn
a higher contribution.
Expense Element
Product Classifications
A B C D
RWF RWF RWF RWF
The administration overheads should be spread equally between factory and sales overheads.
The variable sales overheads are directly related to sales value, and the factory overheads of a
variable nature are related to direct labour costs.
Prepare a statement which shows management in the clearest possible fashion which product
is most profitable, and also a statement to show the effect of two proposals made by the sales
manager:
• That the sale of C can be increased by 10% if a better grade of material is used. This will
increase the variable material cost by 5% per unit.
• That A and D are similar in market appeal, and if A were eliminated the sales of D would
rise by 50%
Solution
XYZ & CO. LTD
Profit Statement - Year End 30 June
A B C D Total
RWF16,570
Cost 4,200
Activity × 100 = x 100 = 10% on sales value
420,000
B C D Total
RWF RWF RWF RWF
Conclusion
The suggestion that the grade of material used in Product C should be improved is worth
pursuing, since the contribution made by that product will be increased.
However, the suggestion that Product A be dropped is not worthwhile, since the extra
contribution gained by Product D does not compensate for the contribution lost on Product A.
Question 2
The XL Co. Ltd manufactures four products, “Mainline”, “Trimline”, “Exline” and
“Superline”. The costs and revenues are as follows:
XL CO. LTD.
Mainline Trimline Exline Superline
RWF RWF RWF RWF
Revenue for year 10,000 15,000 30,000 15,000
* Note that variable costs include prime costs and variable overhead costs.
The directors are considering whether or not to eliminate the products on which losses are
being incurred and concentrate only on the products earning profits. The sales of these latter
products, they are advised, are unlikely to increase and this fact makes the problem more
difficult.
You, as management accountant, are required to present the information in the most appropriate
manner and advise the board of directors on the best course to follow.
Loss RWF4,000
Clearly the position portrayed (RWF4,000 loss) shows that the elimination of Mainline and
Superline will result in a loss instead of a profit.
Profit RWF1,000
Profit RWF2,000
(e) Recommendations
• If sales volumes of the four products cannot be increased, then all four should be produced as
at present. In this way the total possible net profit of RWF7,000 per annum is earned.
• “Mainline” makes a contribution of RWF5,000, so it is worth continuing.
• “Superline” makes a contribution of RWF6,000, so that too is worth continuing.
• If apportionments of fixed overheads are felt to be essential, then a more accurate basis for the
calculation may have to be found.
• A market research investigation into the potentialities of the products is recommended. Possibly
a sales campaign may allow larger volumes to be produced which, in turn, would result in a
larger total contribution.
For many organisations, the limiting factor is sales because they simply cannot sell as many units
as they would like. Therefore, their ability to expand is restricted or limited.
But other factors may also be limited (and this is especially the case in the short term). For
example, machine capacity, raw materials or the supply of skilled labour may be limited for the
period (or until some remedial action resolves the situation)
If an organisation is facing a situation involving a single limiting factor (i.e. where only one resource
is in short supply), then it must ensure that a production plan is established that maximises the
organisation’s profit using the available capacity of this resource.
Assuming that fixed costs remain constant, this is the same as saying that that the
contribution must be maximised from the use of the scarce resource. The profit of an
organisation in this situation will be maximised by maximising the contribution per unit of the
limiting factor. This is the decision rule that must be followed.
Material A 1,030 kg
Material B 1,220 kg
No other source of supply can be found for the next period.
Information relating to the three products manufactured by NT Ltd is as follows:
X Y Z
REQUIREMENT:
(a) Recommend a production mix that will maximise the profits of NT Ltd for the
forthcoming period
(b) NT Ltd has a valued customer to whom they wish to guarantee the supply of 50 units of
each product next period. Would this alter your recommendation?
Solution
(a) The first step is to check whether the supply of each material is adequate or whether
either or both of them represent a limiting factor.
X Y Z Total
MAXIMUM SALES DEMAND (UNITS) 120 160 110
Material A required per unit (kg) 2 1 4
Total Material A required (kg) 240 160 440 840
Material B requires per unit (kg) 5 3 7
Total Material B required (kg) 600 480 770 1,850
It can be seen that there will be sufficient material A to satisfy the maximum demand for the
products but material B will be a limiting factor.
Thus, we employ the decision rule mentioned earlier, i.e. maximise the contribution per unit of
limiting factor. Rank material B in this order and then allocate according to this ranking.
X Y Z
Contribution per unit sold RWF15 RWF12 RWF17.50
Material B per unit (kg) 5 3 7
Contribution per kg of material RWF3 RWF4 RWF2.50
B Ranking 2 1 3
Therefore, NT Ltd. should produce as much of Product Y as possible. Then, when maximum
demand for Y has been met, produce Product X and finally, with any material B leftover,
produce product Z.
(b) The recommended production plan in part (a) does not include sufficient Product Z to satisfy
the requirements of 50 units for the valued customer. Some of the material allocated to Product
X (second in the ranking) must be allocated to Product Z. The recommended production plan will
now be as follows:
Then the maximum amount of Product Y will be produced (first in the ranking) and the remainder
of Material B will be used to produce Product X
It can be seen that the total contribution will be lower than the production plan in part (a). But
the altered plan makes the best use of the available material B within the restriction of market
requirements. Failure to meet the requirements of the valued customer might lead to loss of
future business as this customer may take their business elsewhere.
Example 2
ELG Ltd. manufactures three products A, B and C. The products are all finished on the same
machine. This is the only mechanised part of the process. During the next period, the
production manager is planning an essential major maintenance overhaul of the machine.
This will restrict the available machine hours to 4,200 hours for the next period.
A B C
RWF per unit RWF per unit RWF per unit
REQUIREMENT:
Determine the production plan that will maximise profit for the forthcoming period.
Solution
Firstly, calculate how many machine hours are required for each product:
A B C
Total
Fixed production costs per
unit at RWF6 per hour RWF30 RWF24 RWF18
Machine hours per unit 5 4 3
Maximum demand (units) 750 420 390
Maximum hours required 3,750 1,680 1,170 6,600
Since 6,600 machine hours are required and only 4,200 are available, machine hours are a
limiting factor. To maximise profit for the period, it is necessary to maximise the contribution
per unit of scarce resource. In other words, maximise the contribution per hour of machine time
(Note: Do not allocate hours according to profit per hour or profit per product)
Now, calculate the contribution per machine hour from each of the products:
“A plan quantified in monetary terms, prepared and approved prior to a defined period of time,
usually showing planned income to be generated and/or expenditure to be incurred during
that period and the capital to be employed to attain a given objective.”
A budget is therefore an agreed plan which evaluates in financial terms the various targets
set by a company’s management. It includes a forecast profit and loss account, balance sheet,
accounting ratios and cash flow statements which are often analysed by individual months to
facilitate control.
Budgets are normally constructed within the broader framework of a company’s long-term strategic
plan covering the next five to ten years. This strategic plan sets out the company’s long-term
objectives, whilst the budget details the actions that must be taken during the following year to
ensure that its short and long-term goals are achieved.
Budgetary Control
A definition of budgetary control is:
“The establishment of budgets relating the responsibilities of executives to the requirements
of a policy, and the continuous comparison of actual with budgeted results, either to secure by
individual action the objective of that policy or to provide a basis for its revision.”
Financial budgets are prepared in the same format as the company’s profit and loss, balance
sheet and cash flow statements. In this way it is easy to compare actual and budgeted results
and calculate variances.
Here is a typical statement comparing actual and budgeted results:
R % R % RWF R % R % RWF
W W W W
F F F F
Sales
Tickets
Catering
Souvenirs
Other
Total
Gross Profit
Tickets
Catering
Souvenirs
Other
Total
Overheads
Staff costs
Rent & local authority tax
Electricity
Gas
Cleaning
Repairs
Renewals
Advertising
Entertainment
Commissions
Laundry
Motor expenses
Total overheads
NET PROFIT
You can see that this statement details the month’s performance together with that for the year
to date. It covers the whole company; in order to obtain even greater control it is necessary to
prepare operating statements evaluating the contribution from each area of the business. These
additional statements usually cover the activities of individual managers to identify which of them
are failing to achieve their targets. A typical operating statement is as follows:
Month Cumulative
This statement includes all expenditure under the control of the maintenance manager. It
details expenditure for the month of May and the cumulative position for the year to date. The
statement identifies the month’s main areas of overspend as wages, electricity and gas. For the
year to date the main problem areas are wages, indirect materials and gas.
Under a system of budgetary control the maintenance manager will be asked to prepare a report
explaining all variances and the action being taken to bring the department back onto budget.
These actions will be monitored in the following months to ensure that the corrective measures
have been taken.
Problems Identified
Budgets systematically examine all aspects of the business and identify factors that may
prevent a company achieving its objectives.
Problems are identified well in advance, which in turn allows a company to take the
necessary corrective action to alleviate the difficulty. For example, a budget may indicate that
the company will run short of cash during the winter period because of the seasonal nature
of the service being provided. By anticipating this position the company should be able to take
corrective action or arrange additional financing.
Positive plans for improving efficiency can be formulated and built into the agreed budget. In
this way a company can ensure that its plans for improvement are actually implemented.
Control
It is essential for a company to achieve, if not exceed, its budget.
Achievement of budget will be aided by the use of a budgetary control system which
constantly monitors actual performance against the budget. All variances will be monitored
and positive action taken in order to correct those areas of the business that are failing
to perform.
Raising Finance
Any provider of finance will want to satisfy itself that the company is being managed
correctly and that a loan will be repaid and interest commitments honoured.
The fact that a company has established a system of budgetary control will help to
demonstrate that it is being managed correctly. The budget will also show that the company is
able to meet all its commitments.
TYPES OF BUDGET
There are a number of different types of budget covering all aspects of a company’s operations.
These can be summarised into the following categories.
Operating Budgets
Master budgets cover the overall plan of action for the whole organisation and normally
include a budgeted profit and loss account and balance sheet.
The master budget is analysed into subsidiary budgets which detail responsibility for generating
sales and controlling costs. Detailed schedules are also prepared showing the build-up of the
figures included in the various budget documents.
Capital Budgets
These budgets detail all the projects on which capital expenditure will be incurred during the
following year, and when the expenditure is likely to be incurred. Capital expenditure is money
spent on the acquisition of fixed assets such as buildings, motor cars and equipment.
The capital budget enables the fixed asset section of the balance sheet to be completed and
provides information for the cash budget.
Cash Budgets
This budget analyses the cash flow implications of each of the above budgets. It is prepared
on a monthly basis and includes details of all cash receipts and payments. The cash budget will
also include the receipt of finance from loans and other sources together with forecast repayments.
A large company with a January to December financial year will therefore probably commence
its budget preparation in August of the preceding year. This will allow 4-5 months for the
work to be completed. If it is to be completed successfully, it is essential that a timetable is
prepared detailing what information is required and the dates by which it must be submitted.
The preparation of budgets is a major project and it must be managed correctly.
Organisation
As we have just said, the preparation of budgets is a very important task which is given a
high level of visibility within the company. The overall co-ordination of the budgeting process is
therefore handled at a high level.
Budgeting may be the responsibility of the Finance Director, who will have responsibility for
bringing together the directors and managers’ initial estimates. The Finance Director will
specify the information that is required and the dates by which it is required. S/he will also
circulate a set of economic assumptions so that all directors and managers are preparing their
forecasts against the same economic background.
The Financial Director will eliminate most of the obvious inconsistencies from the initial estimates
and submit a preliminary budget to the Chairman of the company and its Board of Directors. The
Board will consider the overall framework of this preliminary budget so as to ensure that the
budget is acceptable and that it gives the desired results.
The Board must also ensure that the budget is realistic and achievable. If the Board does not
accept any part of the budget then it will be referred back to the relevant managers for further
consideration.
Some companies set up a budget committee to co-ordinate the budgeting process. This
committee carries out similar functions to those we described earlier, but will involve more of the
company’s senior directors and managers. This committee will probably be chaired by the
Chairman of the company.
The final budget must be accepted by the Board of Directors. It will then form the agreed plan
for the following year against which performance will be monitored and controlled.
Each of these constraints limit the company’s ability to generate sales and profits. Sales
cannot exceed the demand for products, and production cannot exceed the limits imposed by
labour and material availability and capacity.
It is essential that a company recognises the fact that it may have a limiting factor, as this will
govern the overall shape of its budget.
(b) Sales
Sales budgets are normally prepared by the company’s marketing department. The
sales budget of a small company may be set by its managing director working in conjunction with
his sales team. The sales budget will take into account the following factors:
• What is the sales trend for each product/service? Are sales increasing or decreasing
and why?
• Will any new product/service be launched and when?
• Will any of the existing products/services be phased out?
• What price increases can be obtained during the year?
• What is the advertising and promotional budget likely to be?
• What will be the pattern of sales throughout the period covered by the budget?
• What will the company’s competitors be doing?
• Are they introducing new products?
• What is their pricing policy?
• Are they being aggressive in order to gain market share?
• What is their advertising expenditure likely to be?
• Are there any new competitors entering the market?
(e) Overheads
The sales budget will be circulated to all managers with responsibility for controlling
costs. These documents will enable each manager to understand the proposed scale of the
company’s operations. Each manager will consider the items of expenditure that he must incur
in order to ensure that the company can achieve its sales targets.
(h) Dividends
Dividends will be budgeted based on the forecast level of profits and the company’s
overall financial policy.
The preceding data will be converted into a budgeted profit and loss account which should be
analysed to individual months and prepared in the same format as the company’s
management accounts.
There will also be detailed operating statements which allocate costs to individual managers.
These statements are also prepared on a monthly basis so that actual expenditure can be
compared with budget.
Balance Sheet
Having completed a budgeted profit and loss account, it is then necessary to complete a
budgeted balance sheet.
• Capital Budgets
Each manager will be asked to submit details of his capital expenditure
requirements, together with a brief summary of the reasons why the expenditure is necessary. A
more detailed appraisal will be required before the expenditure is actually committed.
The capital budget will include items such as:
• New buildings
• Machinery and equipment
• Office equipment
• Computers
• Commercial vehicles
• Motor cars
The sum total of all the managers’ capital expenditure requirements will form a provisional
capital budget.
• Stocks
Companies calculate stock turnover ratios in order to monitor their stock control
function. The formula for calculating stock turnover is:
Cost of sales
Stock turnover =
Average Stock
Companies strive for a high stock turnover, which means they are carrying low stocks and managing
the function effectively. It is therefore possible to target improved performance by setting a
higher stock turnover target for the following year, which can be converted into a stock valuation
by adopting the following formula:
Budgeted cost of sales
Budgeted average stock =
Stock turnover
• Bank Overdraft
The cash budgeting process may indicate that a bank overdraft will be required.
(d) Reserves
The opening balance on reserves will be known. The final figure will be the opening
balance plus or minus the value of retained earnings taken from the budgeted profit and loss
account.
(e) Loans
The opening position will be known. The final figure will be the opening position plus
the value of any new loans less the value of loans repaid.
All the preceding data will be presented in the budgeted balance sheet in the same format as the
company adopts for its monthly accounts. This statement will also be prepared on a monthly
basis to facilitate comparison with actual results.
Budget Review
The company has now completed provisional profit and loss, capital, cash and balance sheet
budgets.
The provisional budget will be considered by the Board of Directors. The Board must satisfy itself
that the budget is achievable and consistent with the company’s overall strategy. If the Board
In large groups of companies, the budget will also have to be approved by the Board of the
company’s holding company.
CONTROL MECHANISM
The budget will detail all aspects of the company’s operations. The company will prepare monthly
profit and loss accounts, operating statements, cash flow statements and balance sheets. Each
of the figures in these documents will be compared with the budget. Variances will be calculated
(the differences between actual and budgeted results). Excessive costs and inadequate sales
will be highlighted and positive action will be required in order to ensure that the company
corrects any adverse variances.
Management by Exception
When a system of budgetary control is in operation, the principle of management by
exception can be applied, i.e. when presenting information on actual results to management,
attention should be given mainly to those areas where there is a deviation from budget.
The expense involved in collecting the cost figures must be borne in mind. A balance should be
struck between keeping costs to the minimum and obtaining the maximum amount of useful
information.
The budget committee should be in possession of the comparison between actual and budget
expenses within two to three weeks from the close of an accounting period. Each period should
be examined in detail by the budget committee, and managerial action taken where necessary.
Prompt presentation of information is important because any adverse trends will probably be
continuing while data is being collected and analysed. If action is to be taken to contain the
results for the succeeding period, it must be taken quickly, so the time required to collect and
analyse the data must be minimised.
Variance Interpretation
Any variances shown by the budget statements should be interpreted by the budget officer.
He should give his view on whether the variance is regarded as controllable or non- controllable.
This part of the operation is most important. The skill and experience of the budget officer will be
of the greatest value to management, who wish to know not only the extent of any deviation from
plan, but more importantly, the reasons for it and any action being taken to correct it.
Remember that one possible cause of variances is poor initial forecasting and budgeting.
Techniques should be kept under constant review and improved over time in the light of experience.
Budget SALES/
PRODUCTION
Actual profit
Compare actual
CHIEF EXECUTIVE/ profit with budget
BUDGET Variance
Figure 7.1: Budgetary Control System
Example
The principles involved in presenting information, and a suggested layout, are illustrated in
the following example.
PQ Co. is operating a budgetary control system. The overhead costs for service department
X are as follows:
Flexible Budget for Dept X - January
RWF
Cleaning 370
Consumable stores 250
Depreciation 210
Insurance 230
Light and fans 250
Power 270
Repairs 210
Wages - indirect 750
You are required to draft an operating statement showing the variances from each type of expense.
Complete the statement by showing possible reasons for the variances.
Answer
The costs (budgeted and actual) should be compared for the actual level of activity
achieved. Accordingly, on the operating statement shown below, the actual activity of
13,000 units forms the basis of the calculation of the budgeted costs. The variability of the costs
can be seen quite clearly from the flexible budget (see next section). Thus, for example,
cleaning costs increase by RWF40 for 2,000 units of service or, in other words, RWF20 for 1,000
units. Therefore, to find the cost for 13,000 units it is necessary to take the cost for 12,000 units
(RWF340) and add the cost for 1,000 units (RWF20), making a total of RWF360.
OPERATINGSTATEMENT
X Department Month:January
Output: 13,000 units
Types of Activity Achieved Variances Reasons forVariances
Expense 13,000 units
In problems in examinations it is not always clear what level of activity has been achieved - this
may have to be calculated from details of sales, stocks and other information.
Profit Variance
Management will be especially interested in why profit was different from budget (not just
costs). The following presentation may be adopted to compare budgeted and actual profit:
RWF
Budget profit x
Plus/minus variance due to sales )
volume/selling prices ) x
x
Plus/minus cost variance x
Actual profit x
FLEXIBLE BUDGETS
Many companies use budgeting simply to compare actual performance with the budget that was
set during the previous financial year. This directs attention towards achieving the agreed
financial targets. The budget is fixed and all variances are reported.
However, as we saw in the previous section, if sales are greater than budget then it can be
expected that cost of sales and variable overheads will also be higher. It is possible to compare
actual results with what is therefore known as a flexible budget. A flexible budget is defined as:
“A budget which, by recognising the difference in behaviour between fixed and variable costs in
relation to fluctuations in output, turnover, or other variable factors such as number of employees,
is designed to change appropriately with such fluctuations.”
Comparison with the original (or fixed) budget would give the following variances:
This would be better highlighted by preparing a flexible budget which shows the expected level
of costs for the actual level of sales at budgeted selling prices. This would result in the following
statement of variances which more accurately reflects the control variances and highlights only
the overspend in material costs of RWF1,100:
It takes time to tease out their genuine expectations, and this process must be handled very
carefully in order to avoid the appearance of imposing budgetary targets on managers. The
eventual target should be realistic but stretching - so as to provide a challenge to the people
involved.
Having constructed the budget, it is also important to recognise that some managers may attempt
to bend the system so that adverse variances are not reported in their area. It is not unknown
for managers to put incorrect codes on their purchase orders so that costs are shown in another
manager’s operating statement, or reported elsewhere on their own. Naturally this does nothing
to help define better budgets in the following years.
It is also essential that the basis of the budget-setting process is understood. In practice it is
often based on the company’s current position and then updated for changes expected in the
forthcoming year. This can lead to established inefficiencies being built into next year’s targets.
An alternative approach is called zero-based budgeting, which challenges the accepted way of
doing things and attempts to construct budgets based on the way operations would be established
if they were being set up for the first time. The budget must obviously start from the company’s
current position, but this type of analysis should encourage the company to progress towards a
better way of structuring its activities.
information to guide the Chief Budget Managers in the preparation of the budget. The 1st
BCC is normally issued in October and it is important that Chief Budget Managers start using it
from October.
The 1st BCC is not intended to seek budget submissions from budget agencies but is rather
aimed at giving advance information to facilitate timely coordination and effective planning within
the sectors to allow formulation of policy based budgets within individual budget agencies at a
later stage. The 1st BCC is aimed at inducing discussions at the sector level on priority activities
to be funded through the Government budget for the following financial year. These priorities
should be reflected in joint sector review report and should be the basis for submission of the
budget requests in response to the 2nd BCC, normally issued in early December.
(a) The total indicative resource envelope derived from the macro-fiscal framework consistent
with the broad policy objectives. The indicative ceilings are issued at high level at line ministries,
provinces and other high level government institutions. This is to allow coordination and
prioritization of activities at the high level of Government programmes. The parent institutions
(Ministries and other high level institutions) that have been allocated ceilings are required to
immediately undertake consultative process with all affiliated agencies to agree on individual
agency ceilings that shall be the basis for the detailed budget estimates to be entered in the
budget system (SmartFMS).
(b) Budget submission formats (Annexes) to be submitted by each budget agency to assist in
preparation of the Finance Law (including externally and internally financed projects, internally
generated revenues, earmarked transfers to districts, Agency MTEFs, Strategic Issues Papers
(SIPs).
The SIPs and agency MTEFs are submitted to MINECOFIN and analyzed by NBD. Budget
consultations are then held between line ministries and MINECOFIN (in March) to agree on final
ceilings to submit to Cabinet & Parliament.
As indicated above, budget preparation is one of the most important responsibilities for a
Chief Budget Manager. Chief Budget Managers should ensure that the contents of the guidelines
are strictly adhered to and all issues therein are addressed in their draft budget estimates.
It should be noted that no budget should be provided for urgent and unforeseen expenditures with
a budget of a central government agency as provided in article 31 of the OBL. Such a budget is
only provided under the budget of Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning. However, each
district may provide for such expenditure in its own budget as provided under article 32 of the law.
Article 35: Expenditure estimates shall be prepared by budget Agencies, based on the
available resources and the guidelines issued by the Minister. Each budget Agency shall have
a separate budgetary line (vote) in the budget. Expenditure estimates of each budget Agency
are organized in a programmatic, economic and functional classification, in line with international
classification standards.
Article 6 of the OBL obliges government institutions to reflect all the revenues including grants
and all expenditures within their budgets. Chief Budget Managers should ensure during
budget preparation that this requirement is respected.
In order to meet the constitutional obligation as per Article 79 to submit the draft budget estimates
and MTEF to parliament before commencement of the budget session, the draft estimates of
Budget Agencies should reach MINECOFIN not later than January 28th, in hard copies and
electronically through SmartFMS. This gives NBD time to analyse the budgets and conduct
Budget Hearings for all Sector Ministries. In months 8-9 (February/March), the detailed draft
budget is prepared by MINECOFIN along with accompanying Budget Framework Paper (BFP).
The BFP sets out the macroeconomic context of the draft budget as well as the key policy
choices underlying the proposed resource allocation. The BFP is discussed by Cabinet and
recommendations are incorporated. The BFP and draft Budget is discussed with donors at the
second Joint Budget Support Review. It is at this point that Development Partners make firm
commitments for the coming year.
The Parliamentary Committee on Budget and State Property in collaboration with other
sectoral committees scrutinizes the BFP and the draft budget estimates and submits a report
to plenary containing recommendations to the Executive for improvement of the BFP and
draft budget estimates. This report is normally submitted before the end of May and becomes the
basis for revising the BFP and preparing the draft Finance Law.
After the approval of the draft finance law by Cabinet around the first week of June, the draft
finance is submitted to Parliament and is officially laid before the Parliament by the Minister of
Finance and Economic Planning during the second week of June. The budget is ordinarily voted
and approved by Parliament before commencement of the next fiscal year.
Districts carry out their own review of last year’s performance which is discussed at the Joint
Action Forum in month 2 (August). During budget preparation, districts participate in consultations
with line ministries on Earmarked Transfers. MINECOFIN (IGFR) sends out the District Budget
Call Circular for Districts to prepare their budgets. Following the finalization of the BFP at the
national level, districts prepare their detailed budget based on final resource envelopes agreed
at Districts’ Joint Action Forum and transfers from Central Government communicated by the
Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning.
As required under article 43 of the OBL, the draft budgets of local administrative entities shall
be submitted to the executive committee of such an entity for further analysis before submission
to the local council of such an entity for examination and approval. When the draft budget of
local administrative entities has been approved by Council, they shall make it public to the general
meeting of the residents convened by the Executive Committee of the local administrative entity,
in each sector.
Revised Budget
Article 45 of OBL provides for revision of budget after six months of implementing the budget.
The proposed changes shall be consistent with the approved medium-term strategies and budget
framework; and if they are different from the approved budget framework, the reasons thereof
shall be notified to the Parliament or to the local Council of such an entity.
Accordingly, the Chief Budget Managers are required to monitor closely the implementation of
their budget by keeping a close eye on issues that might require revision after six months of
implementing the budget. These should be the issues that cannot be handled through
budget re-allocation like information on project funds that has just been communicated by the
donor, under- spending of a project that might require some adjustment in the procurement plan
and thus budget revision etc.
Requests for budget revision should be communicated to the Ministry of Finance and Economic
Planning by the first week of December to have an informed decision of whether a budget revision
is warranted or not by the end of December.
FUNCTIONAL BUDGETS
Sample Data
VT Ltd produces two products - X and Y. The products pass through two departments -
Department 1 and Department 2. The following standards have been prepared for direct
materials and direct wages:
Product
X Y
Material A 5 kg 8 kg
Material B 4 kg 9 kg
Direct labour:
Department 1 3 hours 2 hours
Department 2 2 hours 4 hours
Direct wages:
RWF per hr
Department 1 3.00
Department 2 3.50
Product
RWF per unit
X 50.00
Y 80.00
The budgeted sales for each product for the coming year are:
Product Units
X 8,000
Y 10,000
The company plans to increase the stocks of finished goods, so that the closing stock of
product X will be 2,000 units and the closing stock of product Y will be 3,000 units.
Product Units
X 1,000
Y 2,000
Finished goods are valued at variable production cost.
Opening stocks of direct material are:
Material kg
A 12,000
B 15,000
Product X Product Y
(%) (%)
Commission 5 5
Carriage, packing, transport 4 2.5
Telephone, postage, 2 2
stationery
Fixed production, selling and distribution, and administration overheads are budgeted to be as
follows:
Dept 2 12,000
Dept 1 20,000
Dept 2 22,000
Dept 1 1,100
Dept 2 1,200
1,500
The company’s balance sheet at the beginning of the year was:
Creditors 110,000
Net current assets 267,100
1,067,100
Represented by:
Share capital 800,000
Reserves 267,100
1,067,100
Quarter
(1) (2) (3) (4)
RWF RWF RWF RWF
Debtors 250,000 200,000 300,000 300,000
• Sales
• Production
• Materials purchases
• Direct materials cost
• Direct labour cost
• Production overheads
• Selling and distribution overheads
• Administration overheads
• Trading and profit and loss account
• Balance sheet at year-end
• Cash
Sales Budget
The sales budget will frequently be the starting point of the budget, and it is in our example.
The sales figures will usually determine the production requirements - subject, as in this case,
to any required adjustment to the stocks of finished goods. The sales budget will be derived from
salespeople’s reports, market research, or other intelligence or information bearing on future sales
levels and demand for the company’s products. The sales budget would be analysed according
to the regions or territories involved, with monthly budget figures for territories, salespeople
and products, so that sales representatives would have specific targets against which actual
performances could be measured.
The total sales budget in terms of units and values for the two products will be:
Product Units Unit Price Sales Value
RWF RWF
units units
As with other budgets, the purchasing budget should show the monthly quantities to be purchased,
allowing for any lead time in suppliers’ deliveries.
Materials
A B
kg kg
Material A Material B
Purchases required 140,000 kg 135,000 kg
Note that the quantities for production represent the number of production units in the
production budget multiplied by the kg per unit.
Direct labour-hours:
PRODUCT
X Y
Fixed overheads:
Dept 1 Dept 2
RWF RWF
Salaries 10,000 12,000
Depreciation 20,000 22,000
Stationery, postage, telephone 1,100 1,200
Sundry expenses 1,400 1,300
32,500 36,500
Selling and Distribution Overheads Budget
As with other overhead budgets, the object of this budget is to identify the overheads to be
controlled by the management - in this case the sales management. Further analyses of the
overheads would be required to show the budgeted costs on a monthly basis, and by regions
and representatives where appropriate.
Variable overheads:
Product
X Y
Sales RWF400,000 RWF800,000
RWF
Salaries 22,000
Depreciation 6,000
MASTER BUDGETS
(This is not examinable for Formation 2; however it is useful for information purposes)
RWF RWF
Sales 1,200,000
Opening stock of materials 42,000
Purchases 442,000
484,000
Less Closing stock of materials 56,000
428,000
Direct wages 364,000
Variable production overheads 134,500
926,500
Opening stock of finished goods 145,000
1,071,500
Less Closing stock of finished goods 236,000 835,500
Gross profit 364,500
Overhead Expenses
Variable selling and distribution overhead 120,000
Fixed overheads:
Production 27,000
Selling and distribution 54,500
Administration 26,000
Depreciation:
Production 42,000
Selling and distribution 11,000
Administration 6,000 286,500
Net profit 78,000
Creditors 120,000
Bank overdraft 48,000
168,000
Net current assets 424,000
1,165,000
Represented by:
Share capital 800,000
Reserves 365,000
1,165,000
CASH BUDGET
This budget enables management to see the timing of projected cash flows and the net cash
flow position for each period. Monthly cash flow figures would be provided to show the
anticipated cash position at each point. In the light of this budget, it may be necessary to
make arrangements for overdraft facilities for short-term needs or investment of surplus
funds. In very large organisations the management of funds may require constant attention to
ensure that effective use is made of all available funds. Also separate cash budgets may be
required for operational cash flows and financing cash flows. The operational cash flows
relate to trading operations, and financing cash flows to longer-term financing with related
interest charges.
Example
Cashflow Ltd’s budgeted profit and loss account and balance sheets are as follows:
Overheads
Wages and salaries 10,000 10,000 10,000
Depreciation 4,000 4,000 4,000
Other overheads 20,000 (34,000) 18,000 (32,000) 22,000 (36,000)
Net profit 22,000 17,000 27,000
As at 1 Jan As at 31 Mar
Fixed Assets
Cost 175,000 200,000
Depreciation (20,000) (32,000)
Net book value 155,000 168,000
Current Assets
Stock 7,000 14,000
Debtors 100,000 90,000
Cash 10,000 117,000 81,000 185,000
Current Liabilities
Financed by:
Share capital 100,000 150,000
Reserves 25,000 91,000
Shareholders’ funds 125,000 241,000
Loans 66,000 60,000
191,000 301,000
Additional Notes:
CASH BUDGET
Receipts
January February March
Payments
Purchases (50,000) (30,000) (19,000)
Wages and salaries (10,000) (10,000) (10,000)
Other overheads - (20,000) (18,000)
Purchase of fixed assets - - (25,000)
Taxation - (24,000) -
(i) Sales
All sales are made on one month’s credit. This means that January’s sales will be
paid for in February, February’s sales will be paid for in March and March’s sales will be paid for
in April.
Cash from March’s sales will be received in April, which is not covered by the cash budget. At
the end of March, RWF90,000 is owed to the company which will be shown as debtors in
March’s balance sheet.
(ii) Purchases
The company obtains one month’s credit on all its purchases. January’s
purchases will be paid for in February. February’s purchases will be paid for in
March and March’s purchases will be paid for in April.
At the end of March the company owes its suppliers RWF30,000, which will be shown as part of
creditors in March’s balance sheet.
(iv) Depreciation
Depreciation covers the reduction in value of a company’s fixed assets.
Depreciation is not a cash payment. It is an accounting provision which reduces profits
and the value of assets in the balance sheet.
Cash flow statements are concerned only with cash payments and cash receipts. As depreciation
does not affect cash, it will not appear in a budgeted cash flow statement.
At the end of March the company owes its suppliers RWF22,000 which will be shown as part of
creditors together with the RWF30,000 owed for its other purchases.
Completion of the cash budget on a receipts and payments basis will identify the level of debtors
and creditors. The debtors figure will represent sales made on credit for which payment has not
been received. The creditors figure will represent purchases made on credit that have not yet
been paid for. The statement will also establish the cash or bank overdraft position.
As an alternative, it is possible to calculate debtors and creditors by using target ratios or other
information that will always be given to you in an examination question.
RWF RWF
Operating profit 66,000
Add back depreciation 12,000
Changes in working capital:
Stocks (7,000)
Debtors 10,000
Creditors 2,000
Cash flow from operating activities 83,000
Taxation (24,000)
Capital expenditure (25,000)
Dividends (7,000)
Sources of new finance:
Share capital 50,000
Loan repayments (6,000)
Cash inflow (represented by a change in the cash 71,000
balance)
This type of statement starts with a company’s profits. It then adds back the amount of
depreciation included in the profit and loss account as this does not involve a payment of
cash. Operating profit is then further adjusted for changes in the working capital position:
The effect of raising new share capital will benefit cash and the payment of tax and
dividends and repayment of a loan will obviously reduce the cash balance.
The final figure in the statement is the company’s net cash flow for the period, which is represented
by a change in the company’s cash position. The opening cash position was RWF10,000 and
the closing balance was RWF81,000. The company must therefore have generated a positive
cash flow of RWF71,000.
The advantage of this type of statement is that it clearly identifies those areas of the business that
must be controlled in order effectively to manage its cash resource:
• Cash budgeting highlights the impact that all other decisions have on a company’s financial
resource.
• Cash may be a limiting factor and restrict a company’s plans. The preparation of a cash
budget will indicate if this is the case.
• Budgeting will identify any cash problems that may occur during the period covered by the
budget. Advance warning will enable a company to take corrective action.
• Cash budgets are very useful documents when talking to banks and other financial institutions.
These organisations want to see that a company is controlling its cash, and that it will be in
a position to meet its obligations as they fall due.
A flexible budget, as we mentioned in an earlier study unit, is one which - by recognising the
difference in behaviour between fixed and variable costs in relation to fluctuations in output,
turnover, or other variable factors, such as number of employees - is designed to change
appropriately with such fluctuations. It is the flexible budget which is used for control purposes,
not the fixed budget we have discussed so far.
Cost Behaviour
In order to understand flexible budgets, we must recall our earlier definitions of fixed and
variable costs:
(a) Fixed Cost
This is a cost which accrues in relation to the passage of time and which, within certain
output and turnover limits, tends to be unaffected by fluctuations in the level of activity.
Examples are rent, , insurance and executive salaries.
To obtain the graph in Figure 10.2, investigation has been carried out at activity levels of 10%,
30%, 50%, 70%, 90% and 100% of the budgeted level, and the values plotted. The line of best
fit has then been drawn between them.
It has been assumed that an activity of 64% has been achieved, and the broken line projected
to find the cost which should be associated with this activity level - i.e. RWF5,000.
Discretionary costs such as this are a prime target for cost reduction when funds are scarce,
precisely because they are not related to current production or sales levels. This might be a very
short-sighted policy - nevertheless, it is useful to have these costs separately identified in the
budget.
Given a long enough time-period, all costs are ultimately controllable by someone in the
organisation (e.g. a decision could be taken to move to a new location, if factory rent became
too high). Controllable costs may, however, be controllable only to a limited extent. Fixed
costs are generally controllable only given a reasonably long time-span. Variable costs may
be controlled by ensuring that there is no wastage but they will still, of course, rise more or less
in proportion to output.
BUDGET CENTRE A
Consumable stores 5 15 20
3,405
From the above figures, we can evaluate a level of expense which is appropriate to any level of
output, within fairly broad limits. The figures have been set as the total allowance of expense
which is expected to be incurred at an output level of 1,000 standard hours. Should, however, the
output not be as envisaged, the allowance of cost can be varied to compensate for the change
in level of activity. This adjustment is known as flexing a budget for activity.
We would expect that if 1,000 standard hours were produced, the cost incurred would be
RWF3,405. If the level of output changes for some reason, the level of cost usually changes. We
will assume that the levels of output attained were 750 standard hours in period 4 and
1,200 standard hours in period 5. The budgets would be flexed to compensate for the changes
which have taken place in the actual output compared with those anticipated.
BUDGET CENTRE A
Budget - Period 4 Actual output 750 std hrs
Budgeted output 1,000 std hrs
Production volume ratio 75%
Fuel and power 450 800 1,250 450 600 1,050 986
Consumable stores 5 15 20 5 11 16 19
In this instance, the fixed expenses are deemed to have remained the same but the basic
budget variable figures have been allowed at only 75% of the full budget. We thus attempt to
show that activity has had its effect on cost. For example, we expected that only RWF1,500
would be expended on process labour for the output achieved but, in fact, we spent
RWF1,509, and we exceeded the allowed cost by RWF9.
Now consider the effect on the budget in period 5 of having gained a greater output than that
envisaged originally:
BUDGET CENTRE A
Budget - Period 5 Actual output 1,200 std hrs
Budgeted output 1,000 std hrs
Production volume ratio 120%
Here we have used a factor of 120% as applied to the variable elements of the basic budget. For
fuel and power we observe that the fixed element has remained constant, but we have assumed
that the variable element of RWF800, having risen in sympathy with the level of output, will
have gone up by 20%, to RWF960. The flexed budget figure for fuel and power thus becomes
RWF1,410, compared with the basic budget figure of RWF1,250.
It is clearly more reasonable to compare the actual cost of fuel and power for the period - i.e.
RWF1,504 - with the flexed budget rather than with the basic budget. This explains the entire
purpose of flexible budgeting, insofar as it attempts to provide a value comparison between the
actual figure of cost and the budget figure.
Now work out the following problem for yourself before checking with the answer.
Example 2
From the following selected data of a department the normal and expected workload of which
is 3,000 hours per month:
(a) Compile a flexible budget for 2,000, 2,800 and 3,600 hours of work.
(b) Compile a fixed budget.
(c) Calculate the departmental hourly overhead rate for the total of the following items:
Answer
(a) FlexibleBudgetper
(b) Fixed Budgetper
Month
Month
Hours ofwork 2,000 2,800 3,600 3,000
Budgeted expense
(c) Departmental hourly overhead rate = Budgeted hours
rwf 2,690
3,000 = RWF0.8966
Notes:
(a) Supervision
This is a semi-variable expense, and it rises only when extra hours are worked - e.g.
when the number of employees increases, or when the firm increases the number of supervisors.
The allowance for 2,001 hours to 2,400 hours would be RWF310, and between 2,801 and 3,200
the allowance would be RWF430.
Following this line of reasoning, up to and including 3,600 hours would have an allowance
of RWF490. Anything above 3,600 would have a budget of RWF580 - i.e. including the extra
RWF30.
(b) Depreciation
This is normally a fixed expense - but fixed only within certain ranges of production
activity. Remember that no expense is fixed over a long period or over a wide range of production
activities.
(e) Power
This is a variable expense but, at certain levels of activity, power is supplied at a
cheaper rate.
(g) Repairs
Again, a semi-variable expense. Presumably, when the number of hours worked
increases, more repairs will be required - but not in a direct ratio to the increase in hours.
(j) Rent
Here, this is a fixed expense.
The difference between the flexible budget at a certain level of activity and the actual cost
incurred is, as we know, termed a variance. This may be either favourable or adverse.
Example 3
The flexible budget for the transport department of a manufacturing company contains the
following extract:
In the four-weekly period No.7, the budgeted activity was 100,000 ton-miles but the actual
activity was 90,000 ton-miles. The actual expenditure during that period was:
Depreciation 240
Insurance and road tax 80
Maintenance materials 165
Maintenance wages 115
Replacement of tyres 35
Rent 110
Supervision 130
Drivers’ expenses 315
1,190
Maintenance materials may cause a little difficulty. There is no indication in the problem at what
level of activity the rise from RWF160 to RWF190 takes place. From the information given, it
could be taken as 80,000 ton-miles or 99,999 ton-miles. You will have to make a decision on
which to take - but remember that the level of activity taken in the solution is
80,001 ton-miles and, above this level, the budgeted expense will be RWF190.
But:
It was to combat the disadvantages of traditional budgeting that zero base budgeting (ZBB) was
introduced. ZBB is an attempt to eliminate unnecessary expenditure being retained in budgets. It
rejects the common approach of setting budgets by taking last year’s expenditure as the starting
point for this year’s budget, and instead requires that the budget be built up from scratch. In
this way activities are rejustified each year. The CIMA defines ZBB as:
• “A method of budgeting whereby all activities are re-evaluated each time a budget is formulated.
• Each functional budget starts with the assumption that the function does not exist and is at
zero cost. Increments of cost are compared with increments of benefit, culminating in the
planned maximum benefit for a given budgeted cost.”
The way in which ZBB is implemented will vary from one organisation to another, but the following
steps may be taken:
• The organisation is divided into decision units, each representing a readily identifiable part of
the business, such as a function, division, department or section.
• Managers will be required to prepare decision packages, i.e. documents defining the
objectives, targets and resources which will be needed. It may also be necessary to prepare
alternative budgets based on different levels of production or service.
• Where different levels of budgets are set for decision units, a grading of priorities will be
required in order to assist in the final choice of packages and allocation of available resources.
The technique is most useful when applied to service and support functions such as research
and development and administration, where there is considerable discretion as to the level of
expenditure, and it has been used in non-profit-making organisations such as local government.
When funds are scarce, such a technique is the only way of introducing new projects, as otherwise
existing projects always have first claim on the scarce resources.
ZBB exercises are very time-consuming and costly and some organisations would only carry
out a full ZBB approach, say every three to five years, and would use previous years’ costs
and revenues as a starting point in the intervening years. There may also be communication
problems in explaining ZBB to managers, and lack of co-operation as managers see ZBB as a
threat to their ‘empires’ and status.
A company operating ZBB demands full co-operation and participation from its managers in
producing their respective assessments of requirements. They are made fully responsible for their
decisions. The process requires each manager to justify his total budget (and, subsequently,
justify the use of resources).
example) and finally an indication (cost effect) of not continuing with any particular activity.
Decision packages represent units of intended activity.
Examples of activities within the management accountant’s responsibility could be: material
control unit; payroll purchase ledger; sales ledger; data processing unit. The manager of each of
these areas would be required to produce decision packages on the basis just outlined.
• ZBB, in principle, starts from scratch but, in practice, it would start from a minimum cost level
for each activity, and build up decision packages by changing the inputs.
• This contrasts with traditional budgeting which assumes all activities are necessary and
continuing - there is very little ‘weeding out’.
• Managers are made aware of the corporate effect of their departments’ operations.
• ZBB allows questions to be asked before committing funds, and not afterwards, as in traditional
budgeting.
• Inefficient, redundant or obsolete operations are identified before the budget is
finalised.
• Greater managerial detail is available to the top management.
• Low and middle managers are made fully aware of the smallest details of the many
activities for which they are responsible.
• Managerial education must be at a very high level, with its attendant high training cost.
Question
A manufacturing company intends to introduce zero-based budgeting in respect of its service
departments.
(a) Explain how zero-based budgeting differs from incremental budgeting and explain the
role of committed, engineered and discretionary costs in the operation of zero-based
budgeting.
(b) Give specific examples of committed, engineered and discretionary costs in the
operation of zero-based budgeting.
Answer
(a) Incremental budgeting uses the budget of the previous year as a starting point and
adjustments are made for volume, price changes and efficiency. The basic structure of the budget
is regarded as acceptable as it stands.
Zero-based budgets place the onus on the departmental manager to justify all proposed
expenditure. Nothing is accepted as being necessary expenditure. Each department will need
to consider possible options for the year, which will be ranked and used to decide total budgets
within the overall master budget of the organisation.
The role of a committed cost in zero-based budgeting is to set the minimum level of expenditure
necessary for statutory requirements to be met or for business operations to take place.
An engineered cost is one that is incurred in proportion to activity. These differ under each level
of activity projected under zero-based budgeting.
Discretionary costs are those which management decide whether to incur or not. They will be
assessed on a cost/benefit analysis and accepted or discarded depending on the result.
Committed:
Engineered:
Discretionary:
It was only in the 1980s that the results of years of study of interpersonal relationships percolated
into the field of management accountancy. It is now recognised that failure to consider the
effect of cost control on the people could result in a lowering of morale, reducing motivation
and company loyalty. The effect of this would be a reduction in profits or cost-saving.
Control is achieved by continuous comparison between actual and budgeted results. Instead of
using the term ‘variances’, as used in standard costing, it may be better to call them differences.
These differences could be related to how well managers are performing their functions. It
is necessary to relate the differences in results to performance indicators.
The ultimate purpose of preparing budgets and calculating variances (differences) between
actual and budgeted results is to initiate managerial action. In the case of controllable
variances, speedy authoritative action would result in stemming adverse variances or encouraging
favourable variances. In the case of non-controllable variances, caused by external factors,
swift management action to search for alternatives would be necessary.
The information given to management should be in units easily understood by the level to which it
is directed. The lower levels may be more interested in labour or machine- hours or kg materials
used, while higher levels would require the information in monetary values.
Personal goals and ambitions are strongly linked with organisational goals; these personal
goals may include a desire for a higher social standing and a betterment of the individual’s
status. To satisfy the goals of both the organisation and the individual, there must be goal
congruence. Without this mutual understanding, the economic atmosphere of the organisation
will be much less healthy.
The success of a budget procedure depends, at all times, on people. They must work within the
system in an understanding and co-operative manner. This can be achieved only by individuals
who have a total involvement at all stages of the budgetary procedure, and who share in its
favourable as well as its adverse revelations.
• Standard costing and budgetary control systems concentrate on the short term. It must be
recognised that managers may therefore be placed in a situation whereby they make decisions
that satisfy the short-term control systems but damage the future position of the business. For
example, a manager may decide to reduce hisresearch and development costs in order to
stay within budget. This may satisfy the short-term objectives but will clearly have long-term
implications for the business.
In this study unit and the next we will be looking at the objectives and methods of standard
costing; these will help you understand its purpose, the methods by which standards are set, the
procedures for calculating variances, and the interpretation of variances. In subsequent study
units we will look in detail at budgetary control.
Both budgetary control and standard costing have certain features in common:
Definitions
The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, in its terminology, gives the following
definitions:
Attainable Standards
These are based on attainable conditions, and they are more realistic than ideal
standard costs. Provided that all the factors of production are made as efficient as possible
before the standards are set, the standard costs are likely to be of great practical value.
They represent, to workers and management, realistic figures, capable of achievement. The
variances really do mean increased or reduced efficiency.
The chief weakness of basic standards is that they do not allow the efficiency achieved to be
measured.
• Direct Materials
• Direct Labour
• Variable Overheads
• Fixed overheads
• Sales Variances
Essential Prerequisites
(a) Before manufacturing costs can be predetermined, the following factors must be stated:
Each element of cost - material, labour and overhead - must be taken in turn, and the standard
cost for each product determined. The object must be to ascertain what the costs should be, not
what they will be.
(b) Before any attempt is made to set the standards, all functions entering into production
should be examined and made efficient. Only then will it be possible to have standard costs
which represent true measures of efficiency.
• Standard Quantities
Due allowance should be made for normal losses or wastage. Abnormal losses should be excluded
from the standards, as these are not true costs.
• Standard Prices or Rates
The aim should be to estimate the trend of prices or rates, and then predetermine these having full
regard to expected increases or reductions.
• Standard Quality or Grade of Materials, Workers or Services
Unless the appropriate grade of material or worker is clearly defined when the standards are set,
there will be great difficulty in measuring accurately any variance which may arise. A lower-grade
material may mean an adverse material usage variance and a favourable material price variance
- the one tending, to some extent, to cancel out the other. This sort of situation is bound to
arise, unless materials are standardised and the appropriate grade for a product strictly defined: all
variances are, in some way, related to each other.
• Referring to past records - e.g. stores records kept when historical costing was adopted.
• Making a model of the product, noting all significant facts when the test runs are carried out.
• Establishing the relationship between the size or weight of the product and the material content,
thereby calculating the standard quantity - in the case of screws, for example, the weight of the
screws will indicate the metal content, and a standard quantity can then be fixed.
An alternative approach is to set standard prices based on actual prices ruling on the first day
of the new financial year. This can be completed before the year begins, as suppliers generally
notify price increases in advance. As standards are based on actual
prices at the beginning of the year, it is necessary to calculate a budget for material price
variances which is the company’s estimate of the impact inflation will have on material prices.
This approach has the advantage that costs are based on actual prices and not on forward
estimates which may or may not be accurate. The standard cost represents the actual cost on
the first day of the year and can be used with confidence by the marketing team. As the
year progresses the actual material prices will be compared with these standard prices and the
financial impact on the company calculated. By comparing actual prices with the prices ruling
on the first day of the year, it is possible to get an accurate assessment of the rate of inflation
applicable to material purchases. This information will be compared with the forecast rate of
inflation built into the company’s budget, and can be used to assess the need for selling price
adjustments or other corrective actions.
• Referring to past records, and then adjusting to allow for any changes in conditions.
• Use of time-studies based on work study. Each element of an operation is timed, and
then a total standard is determined by adding together all the element times and adding on
allowances for relaxation, interruption, etc.
• Employment of synthetic time-studies. This is really a combination of (a) and (b). Detailed
records are built up by the use of the time-studies, and then, from these records, the appropriate
elemental times are selected to arrive at the total standard time for any operation which has not
been timed.
When an incentive method of payment is in operation, setting the standard rate may be relatively
simple. For example, for a piece-rate system, the standard rate will be the fixed rate per piece.
To avoid having too many rates, average rates may be used.
The volume of output must be predetermined, especially so that total variable costs for each type
of expense may be calculated. Particular attention must be paid to the allowances to be made for
normal time losses (labour absenteeism, waiting for material, tools, etc.) and also the abnormal
time losses owing to a falling-off in the volume of sales. It has been suggested that up to 20%,
or even more, may have to be deducted to arrive at a ‘normal capacity to manufacture’, and
a further 20% or thereabouts deducted to arrive at a figure to cover losses of sales (known
as the ‘normal capacity to produce and sell’). In the latter case, the long-term (say, six or seven
years) figures are taken, and then a net yearly average is calculated.
For each volume of output, it is possible to have a cost equation, which may take the following
form:
(Variable Units to) Total for each class of expenses = Fixed costs + (cost per unit be made)
The ‘units to be made’ may be expressed in terms of physical units or in standard hours. The
variable cost per unit will have been ascertained from the direct material and labour content,
together with variable overheads. Once the variable cost per unit has been calculated, the
budget may be built up stage by stage, by entering each expense, and then its amount.
• Fixed Budget
This shows the output and costs for one volume of output only; it thus represents a rigid plan.
• Flexible Budget
A number of outputs will be shown, together with the cost for each type of expense. The
fixed costs will be the same for all volumes of output, whereas the variable costs will increase
with increases in activity.
Standard Product Costs
Standard product costs are compiled for each product made. This is done by bringing
together the standard product materials specifications, the standard operations,
the performance standards, and the standard rates. A standard product cost card is
shown in Figure 5.1.
(on wksstd
cost)
(*Brackets denoteaminus figure.)
Figure 5.1: Standard Product Cost Card
Computerised Systems
The standard-setting process is enhanced if the company has invested in computerised
Material Requirements Planning (MRP) systems which require a detailed breakdown of every
component and sub-component used in the finished product. These systems are used in the
production planning and purchasing functions, and allow companies to ‘explode’ the forecast
production programme into a detailed list of all the material and components required to
manufacture it. This requirement can then be compared with the company’s stock positions so
that order quantities can be calculated. It is therefore relatively easy to add the standard cost
of each component to the computer system, which then enables the computer to calculate the
standard cost of each product. The purchasing system is often linked into MRP systems and as
a result it is also possible to update standard costs to actual costs.
D. TYPES OF VARIANCE
The difference between a standard cost (or budgeted cost) and an actual cost is known as a
variance.
In assessing output, the time passage will be 60 minutes and the number of units produced in that
time will be recorded to establish the output of a standard hour. Suppose a factory produces
rulers, and in 60 minutes it is observed that an operative can produce 400 rulers, then 1
standard hour’s output will be assessed at 400 rulers. Further, suppose that, in the course
of an 8-hour day, the output of an operative was 3,600 rulers; on the basis of the agreement the
output would be assessed at 9 standard hours.
Note: 9 standard hours have been produced in 8 clock hours. This distinction between
standard hours and clock hours is vital to the statistics of standard costing.
Example
AB & Co. Ltd produces cars of differing engine capacity, the output being assessed in
standard hours as shown overleaf:
1,000 20
1,500 32
2,000 40
2,600 50
The output statement for a week could then be shown in the following way:
Obviously, when there are changes in methods of production, output comparisons week by week
will not be valid. The figures produced above are not affected by changes in rates of pay or any
change in the value of money.
F. MEASURES OF CAPACITY
CIMA Definitions
The CIMA terminology includes three measures of capacity:
You can see that full capacity refers to an ideal situation, where there are no losses of any
kind. Practical capacity reflects an attainable level of performance, while budgeted capacity takes
into account anticipated conditions in relation to sales, production and labour facilities which will
be available.
8,500
X 100 = 85%
10,000
• Standard costing was developed when the business environment was more stable and
operating conditions were less prone to change. Stable conditions cannot be assumed in
today’s dynamic environment.
• Performance to standard used to be considered satisfactory, but constant improvement must
now be aimed for in order to remain competitive.
• The emphasis on labour variances is no longer appropriate with increasingly automated
production methods.
A business’s decision to use standard costing must depend on its effectiveness in helping
managers make correct decisions. Standard costing may be useful even where the final
output is not standardised. It may be possible to identify various standard components and
activities for which standards can be set and used effectively in planning and control. Also,
the use of demanding performance levels in standard costs may help to encourage continuous
improvement.
Remember that if comparison between actual and standard cost is to be meaningful, standards
must be valid and relevant, so it is important for standard cost to be kept as up-to-date as possible.
Frequent updating of standards may be required to ensure that they fairly represent the
latest methods and operations, and the latest prices which must be paid for the resources being
used.
Follow-up Procedures
It is important that follow-up procedures are established to investigate the causes of
significant variances - otherwise the full benefits of standard costing will not be realised.
• Sales
• Direct wages
• Direct materials
• Variable overheads
• Fixed overheads
In each case, the variances are classified according to their nature - whether price, efficiency or
volume - each type of variance having its own title. The analysis of variable and fixed overheads
will depend upon whether absorption or marginal costing methods are used. In the following
calculations, absorption costing principles are adopted. The forms of analysis used when
marginal (variable) costing methods are employed will be given later. The chart in Figure 6.1
shows the main variances produced under absorption costing methods.
There are also other sub-variances for sales, direct materials and direct wages.
Variance Calculations
In our calculations we shall assume that an organisation has the following estimated (or
budgeted) and actual results:
Budgeted Results
RWF RWF
Costs
Actual Results
RWF RWF
Per Unit
RWF
Selling price 20
Direct materials (1 kg at RWF4) 4
Direct wages (2 hours at RWF3) 6
Variable overheads (2 hours at RWF2) 4
Fixed overheads (2 hours at RWF1) 2
16
Standard net profit per unit 4
• Standard quantity
• Standard price
Where the actual quantity differs from the standard quantity, there will be a usage variance.
Where the actual price differs from the standard price, there will be a price variance.
Price variance: RWF38,500 RWF39,200 = RWF700 (we ignore the minus sign, but must
decide whether the variance is favourable or not - see below).
Having calculated that there is a variance of RWF700, we must now determine whether it is
favourable or adverse. Had the company paid the standard price for the material, the cost
would have been greater than the actual amount paid. So there is a favourable (F) variance in
this case.
The variance could also have been calculated by using the following formula: AQ (AP SP)
The actual price per kg is: RWF38,500 ÷ 9,800 = RWF3.93
Where the purchase prices are above standard, the cause may be a general rise in prices, a
change in materials specifications, or the purchase of smaller quantities from more than one
supplier, with a loss of discounts or less favourable terms.
Note that, in calculating the standard quantity of material, the amount is based on the actual
units sold - not the budgeted quantity, otherwise the variance would not be meaningful. This
procedure of adjusting the budget figures is usually known as flexing the budget.
This is equivalent to the materials price variance, as it reflects the difference in the price or rate
paid for direct labour hours.
The formula is:
(Actual hours Actual rate) (Actual hours Standard rate)
or (AH AR) (AH SR) = (AR SR) AH Using our data, the calculation is:
(AH AR) (AH SR)
19,400 hrs RWF3
RWF56,000 RWF58,200
Wage rate variance = RWF2,200 (favourable)
The variance is favourable, since the actual cost is below the standard cost for the actual hours
worked.
or (AH SR) (SH SR) = (AH SH) SR Using our data, the relevant calculations are: AH SR
SH SR
19,400 hrs RWF3 - 19,000 RWF3
RWF58,200 - RWF57,000
Labour efficiency variance = RWF1,200 (adverse)
The actual overhead incurred is below the standard cost of the hours worked.
AH SR SH SR
19,400 RWF2 19,000 RWF2
RWF38,800 RWF38,000 = RWF800
(adverse)
As with the calculation for labour costs, the standard hours are based upon actual output.
Significant Variances
As we have already noted, the full benefits of standard costing will not be realised unless
variances are analysed and investigated, and corrective action taken where shown to be
necessary.
Not every variance will justify the time and expense of investigation, and some consideration
must be given to determining what are to be regarded as significant variances. Minor
variations, either in terms of money value or as percentages of the amounts involved, need
not call for investigation. It will be necessary to decide for each element of cost the control
limits within which variances can be allowed to occur without investigation. Upper and lower
control limits may be set, and only when variances are outside these limits will investigation
be required.
Example
A company mixes three chemicals together to produce a new material for further processing.
The standard specification is:
(kg) RWF
A 2,500 1.20
B 1,600 2.80
C 900 5.20
5,000
The yield variance represents the gain or loss arising from greater or smaller wastage than
that specified in the standard.
Interpretation of Variances:
Budget
Actual
Summary:
RWF RWF
Interpretation of Variances:
Example
Standard price of material RWF10.00 per kg
Current market price RWF13.00 per kg
Quantity purchased 10,000 kg
Price paid RWF12.80 per kg
Variances:
Price variance
Interpretation of variances:
(a) The price variance, in this case, shows the purchasing department’s efficiency in
purchasing supplies below the current market price.
(b) The planning revision variance shows the effect of price changes which have arisen since
the standards were prepared, and it is uncontrollable so far as the purchasing department is
concerned.
Revision Variances
Various changes may occur during the period when standards are in operation, so the
standard cost of production may change.
Temporary changes - if the changes that take place during production are of a temporary
nature, usual variance analysis will indicate the influence on the standard cost of production.
Management action should follow to correct the situation.
Permanent changes - if the changes are in material used, grade of labour used, or in methods
of production and are of a permanent nature, the standards themselves will need to be
revised. Under such circumstances revision variances could be calculated for a short period of
time. On revising the whole structure of standard costs and variance analysis, say at the end of
a year, any permanent changes will be incorporated.
L. WORKED EXAMPLE
Examination questions frequently require the computation of variances, and much
examination time can be wasted if you do not fully understand the methods of calculating,
presenting and reconciling variances. You should work through the following question
carefully, before comparing your answer with the one given.
Question
X Ltd had the following budgeted and actual results for a recent accounting period:
Budgeted:
RWF RWF
Costs
Direct materials (4,000 kg @ RWF3) 12,000
Direct wages (4,000 hours @ RWF4) 16,000
Variable overheads (4,000 hours @ RWF1) 4,000
Fixed overheads 2,000 34,000
Net profit 16,000
Actual:
Sales (1,900 units) 47,000
Costs
REQUIREMENT:
Prepare all variances for the period, and a statement reconciling the budgeted and actual
profits.
Answer
Variance Analysis
Direct materials:
AQ AP AQ SP SQ AP
3,900 RWF3 3,800 RWF3
RWF11,500 RWF11,700
RWF11,400
(a) (b) (c)
Direct wages:
AH AR AH SR SH SR
3,700 RWF4 3,800 RWF4
RWF15,500 RWF14,800
RWF15,200
(a) (b) (c)
Abnormal Gains The gain resulting when actual loss is less than the normal or expected
loss.
Abnormal Loss The loss resulting when actual loss is greater than the normal or
expected loss.
Absorption Costing The procedure which charges fixed as well as variable overhead
tocost units. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Absorption Rate A rate charged to a cost unit intended to account for the overhead at a
predetermined level of activity. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Activity Based Costing (ABC) Cost attribution to cost units on the basis of benefit received
from indirect activities e.g. ordering, setting-up, assuring quality. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Attainable Standard A standard which can be attained if a standard unit of work is carried out
efficiently, a machine properly operated or a material properly used. Allowances are made
for normal losses, waste and machine downtime. (CIMA) Official Terminology)
Avoidable Costs The specific costs of an activity or sector of a business which would beavoided
if that activity or sector did not exist. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Basic Standard A long term standard which remains unchanged over the years and is used
to show trends.
Batch A group of similar articles which maintains its identity throughout one or more stages of
production and is treated as a cost unit. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Batch Costing A form of specific order costing; the attribution of costs to batches. (CIMA
Official Terminology)
Bill of Materials A specification of the materials and parts required to make a product. (CIMA
Official Terminology)
Breakeven Point The level of activity at which there is neither profit nor loss. (CIMA Official
Terminology)
Budget A plan expressed in money. It is prepared and approved prior to the budget period
and may show income, expenditure, and the capital to be employed. May be drawn up showing
incremental effects on former budgeted or actual figures, or be complied by zero-based budgeting.
(CIMA Official Terminology)
Budget Committee Ideally comprises representatives from every part of the organisation
and oversees the budgeting process by co-ordinating and allocating responsibility for budget
preparation, timetabling, providing information to assist in budget preparation and monitoring
the budgeting and planning process by comparing actual and budgeted results.
Budget Manual A detailed set of documents that provide information and guidelines about
the budgetary process.
Budget Period The period for which a budget is prepared and used, which may then be
sub-divided into control periods. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Budgeted Capacity Standard Hours planned for the period, taking into account budgeted
sales, supplies, workforce availability and efficiency expected.
Cash Buget A statement in which estimated future cash receipts and payments are tabulated
in such a way as to show the forecast cash balance of a business at defined intervals.
Classification The arrangement of items in logical groups having regard to their nature
(subjective classification) or purpose (objective classification). (CIMA Official Terminology)
Code A system of symbols designed to be applied to a classified set of items to give a brief
accurate reference, facilitating entry, collation and analysis. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Committed Cost The future cash outflow that will be incurred regardless of whatever
decision is taken now about alternative opportunities.
Contribution/profit volume (P/V) chart Chart showing the impact on profit of changes in
turnover. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Controllable Cost A cost which can be influenced by its budget holder. (CIMA Official
Terminology)
Cost Accounting The establishment of budgets, standard costs and actual costs of
operations, processes, activities or products; and the analysis of variances, profitability or the
social use of funds. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Cost Accumulation The collection of cost data in some organised way through an
accounting system.
Cost behaviour The way in which costs of output are affected by fluctuations in the level
of activity. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Cost Department The department responsible for keeping cost accounting records.
Cost Driver An activity which generates cost. (Particularly related to activity based
costing). (CIMA Official Terminology)
Cost Pool A group of costs that are associated with the same activity or cost driver.
Cost Unit A unit of product or service in relation to which costs are ascertained.
(CIMA Official Terminology)
Database Frequently a much-abused term. In its strict sense a database is a file of data
structured in such a way that it may serve a number of applications without its structure being
dictated by any one of those applications, the concept being that programs are written around the
database rather than files being structured to meet the needs of specific programs. The term is
also rather loosely applied to simple file management software. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Direct Cost Expenditure which can be economically identified with a specific saleable cost
unit. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Exponential Smoothing A method of short term forecasting which involves the automatic
weighting of past data with weights that decrease exponentially with time so that the most current
values receive the greatest weighting and the older observations receive a decreasing weighting.
Feedback A component of a control system which measures differences between planned and
actual results and modifies subsequent actions to achieve the required results. (CIMA Official
Terminology)
Feedforward Control Control based on comparing original targets or actual results with a
forecast of future results.
First-in, First-out (FIFO) Process Costing Method A process costing method that sharply
distinguishes between the work done on opening work in progress and the work done on work
introduced into the process during the period.
Fixed Budget A budget which does not include any provision for the event that actual volumes
of production may differ from those budgeted.
Fixed Cost/Fixed Overhead/Period Cost The cost which is incurred for a period, and
which, within certain output and turnover limits, tends to be unaffected by fluctuations in the levels
of activity (output or turnover). Examples are rent, rates, insurance and executive salaries. (CIMA
Official Terminology)
Flexible Budget A budget which be recognising different cost behaviour patterns, is designed
to change as volume of output changes. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Forecasting The identification of factors and quantification of their effect on an entity, as a basis
for planning. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Full Capacity Output (expressed in standard hours) that could be achieved if sales order,
supplies and workforce were available for all installed workplaces. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Functional Classification of Costs A group of costs that were all incurred for the same basic
purpose.
High-low Method A technique for determining the fixed and variable components of a total
cost that uses actual observations of total cost at the highest and lowest levels of activity and
calculates the change in both activity and cost.
Historical Cost The actual cost of acquiring assets, goods and services. (CIMA Official
Terminology)
Ideal Standard A standard which can be attained under the most favourable conditions, with no
allowance for normal losses, waste and machine downtime. Also known as potential standard.
(CIMA Official Terminology)
Imputed Cost Cost recognised in a particular situation that is not regularly recognised bu usual
accounting procedures.
Integrated Accounts A set of accounting records which provides financial and cost accounts
using a common input of data for all accounting purposes. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Job Costing A form of specific order costing; the attribution of cost to jobs. (CIMA Official
Terminology)
Joint Products Two or more products separated in processing, each having sufficiently high
saleable value to merit recognition as a main product. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Least Squares Method (of regression analysis) Method of finding the line of best fit.
Limiting Factor/Key Factor Anything which limits the activity of an entity. An entity seeks to
optimise the benefit it obtains from the limiting factor. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Line of Best Fit Represents the best linear relationship between two variables.
Marginal Cost Plus Pricing/Mark-up Pricing Method of determining the sales price by
adding a profit margin onto either marginal cost of production or marginal cost of sales.
Marginal Costing The accounting system in which variable costs are charged to cost units and
fixed costs of the period are written off in full against the aggregate contribution. Its special value
is in decision-making. The objective is to obtain an optimal solution to a complex operational
problem, given a number of alternative values of stated variables and quantitive constraints as to
their use. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Master Budget The set of budgeted profit and loss account, budgeted balance sheet
and cash budget.
Minimum Pricing Price charged that just covers both the incremental costs of production and
selling an item and the opportunity costs of the resources consumed in making and selling it.
Mixed Cost See Semi-Variable Cost
Moving Averages A technique involving the calculation of consecutive averages over time
to establish the trend of a time series.
Notional Cost The value of a benefit where no actual cost incurred. (CIMA Official
Terminology)
Operating StatementA regular report for management of actual cost, and revenue,
as appropriate. Usually compares actual with budget and shows variances. (CIMA Official
Terminology)
Overhead Absorption Rate A means of attributing overhead to a product or service based, for
example, on direct labour hours, direct hour cost or machine hours. (CIMA Official Terminology)
Semi-Variable Cost/Semi-Fixed Cost/Mixed Cost A cost containing both fixed and variable
components and which is thus partly affected by fluctuations in the level of activity. (CIMA
Official Terminology)
Standard Costing A control technique which compares standard cost and revenues with
actual results to obtain variances which are used to stimulate improved performance. (CIMA
Official Terminology)
Step Cost A cost which is fixed in nature but only within certain levels of activity.
Time Series Analysis The analysis of a series of figures or values recorded over time.
Uncontrollable Cost A cost that cannot be affected by management within a given time
period.
Variable Cost Cost which tends to vary with the level of activity. (CIMA Official
Terminology)
Variance Difference between planned, budgeted, or standard cost and actual cost; and
similarly for revenue. Not to be confused with statistical variance which measures the dispersion
of a statistical population.
Variance Analysis The analysis of performance by means of variances. Used to promote
management action at the earliest possible stages.
Weighted Average Process Costing Method A process costing method that adds the cost of
all work done in the current period to the cost of work done in the preceding period on the current
period’s opening work in process and divides the total by the equivalent units of work done to
date.