PROFED 4 Chap1-4
PROFED 4 Chap1-4
CHAPTER I: Metacognition
Objectives:
“Metacognitive
thinking teaches us
about ourselves,”
Tamara Rosier
Metacognition is defined in simplest terms as “thinking about your own thinking.” The
root “meta” means “beyond,” so the term refers to “beyond thinking.” Specifically, this
means that it encompasses the processes of planning, tracking, and assessing your own
understanding or performance.
Metacognition (derived from the Greek root word "meta" meaning "beyond" and the Latin
word "cognoscere" meaning "getting to know") refers to a student’s ability to be aware of
what they are thinking about and choose a helpful thought process. It captures a student’s
ability to:
if I notice that I am having more trouble learning A than B; if it strikes me that I should
double check C before accepting it as fact.”
Flavell argued that metacognition explains why children of different ages deal with
learning tasks in different ways, i.e., they have developed new strategies for thinking.
Research studies (see Duell, 1986) seem to confirm this conclusion; as children get older
they demonstrate more awareness of their thinking processes.
Metacognition has to do with the active monitoring and regulation of cognitive processes.
It represents the “executive control” system that many cognitive theorists have included
in their theories (e.g., Miller, Newell & Simon, Schoenfeld). Metacognitive processes are
central to planning, problem-solving, evaluation and many aspects of language learning.
Metacognition is relevant to work on cognitive styles and learning strategies in so far as
the individual has some awareness of their thinking or learning processes.
situation again he withdraws his fingers faster. Gradually he learns to avoid not
only the burning candle but also other burning things. The behaviour of an
individual is thus changed through experiences. This change in behaviour brought
about by experiences is commonly known as learning.
2. Goals of the Learning Process - the successful learner, over time and with support
and instructional guidance, can create meaningful, coherent representations of
knowledge.
The learning goal is the backbone of a lesson and provides the “reason” for teaching and
observing it.
3. Construction of Knowledge - the successful learner can link new information with
existing knowledge in meaningful ways. Knowledge widens and deepens as students
continue to build links between new information and experiences and their existing
knowledge base.
Students learn by connecting new knowledge with knowledge and concepts that
they already know, thereby constructing new meanings (NRC, 2000). Research
suggests that students connect knowledge most effectively in active social
classrooms, where they negotiate understanding through interaction and varied
approaches. Instructors should be aware that students, as novice learners, often
possess less developed or incomplete conceptual frameworks (Kober, 2015). As
a result, it may take time to learn how to “chunk” knowledge into similar, retrievable
categories, grow larger conceptual ideas, and interconnect ideas. They may also
harbor misconceptions or erroneous ways of thinking, which can limit or weaken
connections with new knowledge (Ambrose, et. al, 2010).
4. Strategic Thinking - the successful learner can create and use a repertoire of thinking
and reasoning strategies to achieve complex learning goals. Successful learners use
in their approach to learning reasoning, problem solving, and concept learning.
Strategic thinking is simply an intentional and rational thought process that focuses
on the analysis of critical factors and variables that will influence the long-term
success of a business, a team, or an individual.
Strategic thinking includes careful and deliberate anticipation of threats and
vulnerabilities to guard against and opportunities to pursue. Ultimately strategic
thinking and analysis lead to a clear set of goals, plans, and new ideas required to
survive and thrive in a competitive, changing environment. This sort of thinking
must account for economic realities, market forces, and available resources.
Strategic thinking requires research, analytical thinking, innovation, problem-
solving skills, communication and leadership skills, and decisiveness.
5. Thinking about thinking - Successful learners can reflect on how they think and learn,
set reasonable learning or performances goals, select potentially appropriate
learning strategies or methods, and monitor their progress towards these goals.
Metacognition is the ability to think about and regulate one’s own thoughts.
Teaching metacognitive strategies can improve learners’ performance at school.
This makes it a good, evidence-based target for intervention.
A simplified definition of metacognition is “thinking about thinking”, but
metacognition also encompasses the regulation of these thoughts – the ability to
change them. It is a step further than simple awareness of thought processes,
incorporating the ability to alter thoughts and behaviours. Explicitly teaching
learners strategies for metacognition has been shown to lead to improvements in
attainment.
Objectives:
7. Motivational and emotional influences on learning the rich internal world of thoughts,
beliefs, goals, and expectation for success or failure can enhance or interfere with the
learner’s quality of thinking and information processing.
11. Social influence on learning - Learning can be enhanced when the learner has an
opportunity to interact and to collaborate with others on instructional tasks.
12. Individual differences in learning - individuals are born with and develop their own
capabilities and talents. Educators need to help students examine their learning
preferences and expand or modify them, if necessary.
13. Learning and diversity - the same basic principles of learning, motivation, and effective
instruction apply to all learners.
14. Standards and assessment - Assessment provides important information to both the
learner and teacher at all stages of the learning process.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8I2hrSRbmHE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L46xtneepu0
Objectives:
Development Theories
Children begin to think symbolically and learn to use words and pictures to
represent objects.
Children at this stage tend to be egocentric and struggle to see things from the
perspective of others.
While they are getting better with language and thinking, they still tend to think
about things in very concrete terms.
At this stage, the adolescent or young adult begins to think abstractly and reason
about hypothetical problems
Abstract thought emerges
Teens begin to think more about moral, philosophical, ethical, social, and political
issues that require theoretical and abstract reasoning
Begin to use deductive logic, or reasoning from a general principle to specific
information
Infants must learn that adults can be trusted. This occurs when adults meet a child’s basic
needs for survival. Infants are dependent upon their caregivers, so caregivers who are
responsive and sensitive to their infant’s needs help their baby to develop a sense of trust;
their baby will see the world as a safe, predictable place. Unresponsive caregivers who
do not meet their baby’s needs can engender feelings of anxiety, fear, and mistrust; their
baby may see the world as unpredictable. If infants are treated cruelly or their needs are
not met appropriately, they will likely grow up with a sense of mistrust for people in the
world.
Begin to explore their world, they learn that they can control their actions and act on their
environment to get results. They begin to show clear preferences for certain elements of
the environment, such as food, toys, and clothing. A toddler’s main task is to resolve the
issue of autonomy vs. shame and doubt by working to establish independence. This is
the “me do it” stage. For example, we might observe a budding sense of autonomy in a
2-year-old child who wants to choose her clothes and dress herself. Although her outfits
might not be appropriate for the situation, her input in such basic decisions has an effect
on her sense of independence. If denied the opportunity to act on her environment, she
may begin to doubt her abilities, which could lead to low self-esteem and feelings of
shame.
Once children reach the preschool stage (ages 3–6 years), they are capable of initiating
activities and asserting control over their world through social interactions and play.
According to Erikson, preschool children must resolve the task of initiative vs. guilt.By
learning to plan and achieve goals while interacting with others, preschool children can
master this task. Initiative, a sense of ambition and responsibility, occurs when parents
allow a child to explore within limits and then support the child’s choice. These children
will develop self-confidence and feel a sense of purpose. Those who are unsuccessful at
this stage—with their initiative misfiring or stifled by over-controlling parents—may
develop feelings of guilt.
During the elementary school stage (ages 6–12), children face the task of industry vs.
inferiority. Children begin to compare themselves with their peers to see how they
measure up. They either develop a sense of pride and accomplishment in their
schoolwork, sports, social activities, and family life, or they feel inferior and inadequate
because they feel that they don’t measure up. If children do not learn to get along with
others or have negative experiences at home or with peers, an inferiority complex might
develop into adolescence and adulthood.
In adolescence (ages 12–18), children face the task of identity vs. role
confusion. According to Erikson, an adolescent’s main task is developing a sense of self.
Adolescents struggle with questions such as “Who am I?” and “What do I want to do with
my life?” Along the way, most adolescents try on many different selves to see which ones
fit; they explore various roles and ideas, set goals, and attempt to discover their “adult”
selves. Adolescents who are successful at this stage have a strong sense of identity and
are able to remain true to their beliefs and values in the face of problems and other
people’s perspectives. When adolescents are apathetic, do not make a conscious search
for identity, or are pressured to conform to their parents’ ideas for the future, they may
develop a weak sense of self and experience role confusion. They will be unsure of their
identity and confused about the future. Teenagers who struggle to adopt a positive role
will likely struggle to “find” themselves as adults.
People in early adulthood (20s through early 40s) are concerned with intimacy vs.
isolation. After we have developed a sense of self in adolescence, we are ready to share
our life with others. However, if other stages have not been successfully resolved, young
adults may have trouble developing and maintaining successful relationships with others.
Erikson said that we must have a strong sense of self before we can develop successful
intimate relationships. Adults who do not develop a positive self-concept in adolescence
may experience feelings of loneliness and emotional isolation.
From the mid-60s to the end of life, we are in the period of development known as late
adulthood. Erikson’s task at this stage is called integrity vs. despair. He said that people
in late adulthood reflect on their lives and feel either a sense of satisfaction or a sense of
failure. People who feel proud of their accomplishments feel a sense of integrity, and they
can look back on their lives with few regrets. However, people who are not successful at
this stage may feel as if their life has been wasted. They focus on what “would have,”
“should have,” and “could have” been. They face the end of their lives with feelings of
bitterness, depression, and despair.
Lev Vygotsky (1896-1934) argued that culture has a major impact on a child’s cognitive
development. Piaget and Gesell believed development stemmed directly from the child,
and although Vygotsky acknowledged intrinsic development, he argued that it is the
language, writings, and concepts arising from the culture that elicit the highest level of
cognitive thinking (Crain, 2005). He believed that the social interactions with adults and
more learned peers can facilitate a child’s potential for learning. Without this interpersonal
instruction, he believed children’s minds would not advance very far as their knowledge
would be based only on their own discoveries. Let’s review some of Vygotsky’s key
concepts.
Private Speech: Do you ever talk to yourself? Why? Chances are, this occurs when you
are struggling with a problem, trying to remember something, or feel very emotional about
a situation. Children talk to themselves too. Piaget interpreted this as Egocentric
Speech or a practice engaged in because of a child’s inability to see things from another’s
point of view. Vygotsky, however, believed that children talk to themselves in order to
solve problems or clarify thoughts. As children learn to think in words, they do so aloud
before eventually closing their lips and engaging in Private Speech or inner speech.
Thinking out loud eventually becomes thought accompanied by internal speech, and
talking to oneself becomes a practice only engaged in when we are trying to learn
something or remember something. This inner speech is not as elaborate as the speech
we use when communicating with others (Vygotsky, 1962).
Level 1: Preconventional
- Focuses on the child’s desire to obey rules and avoid being punished. For
example, an action is perceived as morally wrong because the perpetrator is
punished; the worse the punishment for the act is, the more “bad” the act is
perceived to be.
- Expresses the “what’s in it for me?” position, in which right behavior is defined
by whatever the individual believes to be in their best interest. Stage two
reasoning shows a limited interest in the needs of others, only to the point
where it might further the individual’s own interests. As a result, concern for
others is not based on loyalty or intrinsic respect, but rather a “you scratch my
back, and I’ll scratch yours” mentality. An example would be when a child is
asked by his parents to do a chore. The child asks “what’s in it for me?” and
the parents offer the child an incentive by giving him an allowance.
Level 2: Conventional
Throughout the conventional level, a child’s sense of morality is tied to personal and
societal relationships. Children continue to accept the rules of authority figures, but this
is now due to their belief that this is necessary to ensure positive relationships and societal
order. Adherence to rules and conventions is somewhat rigid during these stages, and a
rule’s appropriateness or fairness is seldom questioned.
- Children want the approval of others and act in ways to avoid disapproval.
Emphasis is placed on good behavior and people being “nice” to others.
- The child blindly accepts rules and convention because of their importance in
maintaining a functioning society. Rules are seen as being the same for
everyone, and obeying rules by doing what one is “supposed” to do is seen as
valuable and important. Moral reasoning in stage four is beyond the need for
individual approval exhibited in stage three. If one person violates a law,
perhaps everyone would—thus there is an obligation and a duty to uphold laws
and rules. Most active members of society remain at stage four, where morality
is still predominantly dictated by an outside force.
- the world is viewed as holding different opinions, rights, and values. Such
perspectives should be mutually respected as unique to each person or
community. Laws are regarded as social contracts rather than rigid edicts.
Those that do not promote the general welfare should be changed when
necessary to meet the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This is
achieved through majority decision and inevitable compromise. Democratic
government is theoretically based on stage five reasoning.
Objectives:
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE
1. Visual-Spatial Intelligence
2. Linguistic-Verbal Intelligence
3. Logical-Mathematical Intelligence
4. Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence
5. Musical Intelligence
6. Interpersonal Intelligence
7. Intrapersonal Intelligence
8. Naturalistic Intelligence
Naturalistic is the most recent addition to Gardner’s theory and has been met with
more resistance than his original seven intelligences. According to Gardner,
individuals who are high in this type of intelligence are more in tune with nature
and are often interested in nurturing, exploring the environment, and learning about
other species. These individuals are said to be highly aware of even subtle
changes to their environments.
1. Synthesists - are creative thinkers who perceives the world in terms of. When
you say black, they think white, when you say long, they opposites think short.”
To connect with Synthesists,“listen appreciatively to their speculation and don’t
confuse their arguing nature with resistance.”
2. Idealists - believe in lofty goals and standards. “To connect with Idealists,
associate what you want to do with these goals of quality, service, and community
good.”
3. Pragmatic Thinkers - are flexible, resourceful folk who look for immediate payoff
rather than for a grand plan that will change the world. “To connect with
Pragmatists, “emphasize short-term objectives on which you can get started with
resources at hand.”
5. Realist Thinkers - are fast moving doers who know that reality is what their senses
– sight, sound, taste, smell, and touch – tell them it is, and not that dry stuff that
one finds in accounting ledgers, or the insipid pages of manual of operations.”
1. Visual learners - Someone with a preference for visual learning is partial to seeing
and observing things, including pictures, diagrams, written directions and more.
This is also referred to as the “spatial” learning style. These are your doodling
students, your list makers and your students who take notes
2. Auditory learners - Auditory learners tend to learn better when the subject matter
is reinforced by sound. These students would much rather listen to a lecture than
read written notes, and they often use their own voices to reinforce new concepts
and ideas. These are the students who like to read out loud to themselves, aren’t
afraid to speak up in class and are great at verbally explaining things. Additionally,
they may be slower at reading and may repeat things a teacher tells them.
MENTAL
RETARDATON
LEARNING SENSORY
DISABILITIES IMPAIRMENT
EXEPTIONALITIES
AUTISM
CATEGORIES OF EXCEPTIONALITIES
a. SPECIFIC COGNITIVE OR ACADEMIC DIFFICULTIES
Learning Disabilities – involves difficulties in specific cognitive process. Like
dyslexia (reading), dyscalculia (number operations), and dysgraphia
(writing).
Attention – deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) – difficulty in focusing and
maintain attention. Recurrent hyperactive and impulsive behaviour.
Speech Communication Disorder – difficulties in spoken language like voice
disorders, inability to produce the sounds correctly, shuttering.