Prac 36
Prac 36
PART 2. Read the text below and think of the word which best fits each space. Use only ONE word in
each space. (10 points)
Technology's continual surge forward is well evidenced in television, advertising and multimedia, so
it's not difficult to deduce that the general public's knowledge of computers must develop at the same (1)
______pace/speed___. The level of computer (2) ___knowledge/expertise______ required to succeed in life
is hardly limited to emailing, surfing the web and having a basic knowledge of Microsoft Word. A seasoned
employee is likely to be well versed in the ins and (3) ___outs______ of computer software and hardware, as
least to some extent. In fact, former UK culture minister Ed Vaizey recently postulated that knowing how a
computer works would be on a (4) ___par______ with a knowledge of the arts and humanities. He also
suggested that knowing a bit about computer coding would acquaint people with the digital world in a way
that would allow them to become an active participant in its evolutionary (5) ____phase_____.
Acquiring above-average skills in computer usage isn't even (6) ___all______ that's required, because as
computer systems and programs become obsolete, users have to learn new sets of keystrokes, menu options
and interfacing. It (7) _____goes____ far beyond basic office management and data processing; medical
equipment is often tethered (8) _____to____ a computer system which aids doctors and nurses in
interpreting vital data. While there may still be some fields of employment in which computers take a back
(9) _____seat____ to the work (think fishing), there isn't a job, field or profession that wouldn’t benefit from
a digital revolution. (10) ____come_____ to think of it, even the smallest of fishing boats are likely to be
fitted with GPS devices!
Part 3. Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate
the correct answer to each of the questions from 1 to 5. (10 points)
LIFTOFF oversteer AND REENTRY
During any space mission, whether it is manned or unmanned, the two most critical periods are liftoff
and reentry. This fact is proven by the fact that every loss of life in the history of space exploration has
occurred during a liftoff or reentry maneuver. Liftoff and reentry not only represent the times of greatest
danger during a space mission, they also present the greatest science and engineering challenges to the
planners and organizers of a space mission.
The major challenge during liftoff is to achieve a great enough velocity to break free of the Earth’s
gravitational pull and escape the atmosphere. The velocity required varies depending on the type of the
mission in question. For example, most orbital missions, like those to the International Space Station or the
launching of a satellite, do not require the spacecraft to complete escape Earth’s gravitational pull. These
spacecraft simply need enough velocity to achieve a certain distance from Earth and then to maintain their
orbit. The speed necessary for this is dependent on the type of orbit desired, but is generally around 24,000
kilometers per hour. Completely escaping the Earth’s gravity, as is needed for interplanetary missions, is a
far more difficult undertaking, requiring a speed of 40,200 kilometers per hour.
To achieve such high speeds, huge rockets must be built. This, however, presents another problem:
the larger the rocket, the larger the total mass that must be lifted into space. This means more fuel is needed,
adding more weight. For this reason, as spacecraft grow larger it becomes increasingly more difficult to lift
them into space. For example, NASA’s space shuttle weighs 78,000 kg, but the rocket required to lift it into
orbit weighs nearly 2,000,000 kg. This means that rockets are actually highly inefficient, since much of the
rocket’s energy is expended lifting the rocket into space, rather than simply the spacecraft that one wants to
place in space.
To help offset this inefficiency, launch sites for rockets are planned carefully. With the exception of a
few launch sites used for highly specialized purposes, nearly all launch sites are placed as near the equator as
possible. Since the equator is the Earth’s widest point, it is also the point where the Earth is spinning the
fastest. Spacecraft can use this fact to receive a little extra “push” from the Earth, reducing the work their
rockets must do during liftoff.
Once a spacecraft has made it safely into space, the next major challenge is for it to return to Earth in
one piece. While the major challenge during liftoff is gaining speed, the three major challenges of reentry are
reducing speed, controlling the angle of reentry, and reducing heat. To initiate reentry, spacecraft perform a
maneuver called a deorbital burn. Simply put, this means they fire their engines in reverse to slow the
spacecraft down. Once the spacecraft has passed below the critical orbital velocity, gravity will once again
take over and begin to pull the spacecraft back towards Earth.
The amount of speed lost during the deorbital burn will determine the angle of reentry, and this angle
is of critical importance. If the reentry angle is too low, the spacecraft will skip off the Earth atmosphere,
much as pebble skips across the water when thrown into a pond. If the angle is too high, the spacecraft will
generate too much heat and burn up during reentry. Even with a correct angle of reentry, spacecraft generate
enormous amounts of heat. As they enter the Earth’s atmosphere, the friction between the spacecraft and the
surrounding air serves to slow the spacecraft, but it also can heat the outer surfaces of the spacecraft to
5,500C. To minimize this effect, spacecraft are designed to create the smallest amount of friction possible
during reentry. Special heat-resistant materials are also used on reentry surfaces of the spacecraft. In this
way, the heat of reentry can be kept to manageable levels.
1. Paragraph A _____iii_______
2. Paragraph B ______v______
3. Paragraph C _______vi_____
4. Paragraph D ______i______
5. Paragraph E ______iv______
A. To detectives, the answers lie at the end of our fingers. Fingerprinting offers an accurate and infallible
means of personal identification. The ability to identify a person from a mere fingerprint is a powerful tool
in the fight against crime. It is the most commonly used forensic evidence, often outperforming other
methods of identification. These days, older methods of ink fingerprinting, which could take weeks, have
given way to newer, faster techniques like fingerprint laser scanning, but the principles stay the same. No
matter which way you collect fingerprint evidence, every single person’s print is unique. So, what makes our
fingerprints different from our neighbors?
B. A good place to start is to understand what fingerprints are and how they are created. A fingerprint is
the arrangement of skin ridges and furrows on the tips of the fingers. This ridged skin develops fully during
fetal development, as the skin cells grow in the mother’s womb. These ridges are arranged into patterns and
remain the same throughout the course of a person’s life. Other visible human characteristics, like weight
and height, change over time whereas fingerprints do not. The reason why ever fingerprint is unique is that
when a baby’s genes combine with environmental influences, such as temperature, it affects the way the
ridges on the skin grow. It makes the ridges develop at different rates, buckling and bending into patterns.
As a result, no two people end up having the same fingerprints. Even identical twins possess dissimilar
fingerprints.
C. It is not easy to map the journey of how the unique quality of the fingerprint came to be discovered.
The moment in history it happened is not entirely clear. However, the use of fingerprinting can be traced
back to some ancient civilizations, such as Babylon and China, where thumbprints were pressed onto clay
tablets to confirm business transactions. Whether people at this time actually realized the full extent of how
fingerprints were important for identification purposes is another matter altogether. One cannot be sure if the
act was seen as a means to confirm identity or a symbolic gesture to blind a contract, where giving your
fingerprint was like giving your word.
D. Despite this uncertainty, there are those who made a significant contribution towards the analysis of
fingerprinting. History tells us that a 14 th century Persian doctor made an early statement that no two
fingerprints are alike. Later, in the 17th century, Italian physician Marcello Malpighi studied the
distinguishing shapes of loops and spirals in fingerprints. In his honor, the medical world later named a layer
of skin after him. It was, however, an employee for the East India Company, William Herschel, who came to
see the true potential of fingerprinting. He took fingerprints from the local people as a form of signature for
contracts, in order to avoid fraud. His fascination with fingerprints propelled him to study them for the next
twenty years. He developed the theory that fingerprints were unique to an individual and did not change at
all over a lifetime. In 1880 Henry Faulds suggested that fingerprints could be used to identify convicted
criminals. He wrote to Charles Darwin for advice, and the idea was referred on to Darwin’s cousin, Sir
Francis Galton. Galton eventually published an in-depth study of fingerprint science in 1892.
E. Although the fact that each person has a totally unique fingerprint pattern had been well documented
and accepted for a long time, this knowledge was not exploited for criminal identification until the early 20 th
century. In the past, branding, tattooing and maiming had been used to mark the criminal for what he was. In
some countries, thieves would have their hands cut off. France branded criminals with the fleur-de-lis
symbol. The Romans tattooed mercenary soldiers to stop them from becoming deserters.
F. For many years, police agencies in the Western world were reluctant to use fingerprinting, much
preferring the popular method of the time, the Bertillon System, where dimensions of certain body parts
were recorded to identify a criminal. The turning point was in 1903 when a prisoner by the name of Will
West was admitted into Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary. Amazingly, Will had almost the same Bertillon
measurements as another prisoner residing at the very same prison, whose name happened to be William
West. It was the only their fingerprints that could tell them apart. From that point on, fingerprinting became
the standard for criminal identification.
G. Fingerprinting was useful in identifying people with a history of crime and who were listed on a
database. However, in situations where the perpetrator was not on the database and a crime had no
witnesses, the system fell short. Fingerprint chemistry is a new technology that can work alongside
traditional fingerprinting to find clues than ever before. From organic compounds left behind on a print, a
scientist can tell if the person is a child, an adult, a mature person or a smoker, and much more. It seems,
after all these years, fingers continue to point the way.
For questions 6-10, decide whether the following statements are True (T), False (F) or Not Given (NG).
Write your answers in the corresponding numbered boxes provided. (10 points)
A. Today’s proliferating travel journalists and guidebook writers seem to be portraying the world in an
increasingly uniform manner. Superficial responses and preconceived images alternate with easily
digestible bites of cultural and historical information and with ever-larger doses of ephemeral and
often misleading practical information. It is thus with enormous relief that one comes across
guidebooks written not only with passion and profound knowledge, but also from an unusual and at
times commercially foolhardy perspective.
B. The crisply designed City Secrets, Rome, is one guidebook with a difference. Unashamedly
proclaiming itself to be a ‘highly subjective’ work, it brings together the personal choices of what to
see and experience in Rome of numerous artists who are regular associates of the city’s American
Academy. Under its influence, you might well be encouraged, say, to undertake such an unusual
activity as a “Tosca stroll”. The main problems are that the entries are often too short to be
enlightening, and are sometimes backed up, unnecessarily, by lists of largely unfamiliar names
endorsing the recommendations.
C. With glorious disregard for current fashions in guidebook production, the recently founded Signal
Books Ltd of Oxford has begun bringing out a series of discursive, virtually unillustrated, and highly
literate city guides. This extremely promising series, entitled Cities of the Imagination, concentrates
as much on the image of a city as formed by artists and writers as it does on surviving monuments.
The series was launched by Jason Wilson’s masterly Buenos Aires, which, with its exceptional
wealth of literary references, does full justice to a city whose fictional identity is far more potent than
the stereotypical tourist vision. Wilson’s book inspires the reader to escape into the little-explored
world of Argentinian literature. Later volumes in the series, if the previews are anything to go by,
will be equally rich in their treatment of a place’s artistic associations, which, in guidebooks in
general, have tended to fare far less well than literary ones.
D. Among the very few existing guides devoted solely to retracing an artist’s footsteps is Ellen
Williams’ slight but very readable Picasso’s Paris. She outlines here four walks which have been
intelligently devised so as to give the reader a sense of the artist’s personal and artistic development,
beginning with his impoverished days in Montmartre and ending with his later years when he spent
time in the area of St-Germain-des-Pres. Another good publisher offering titles with an artistic slant
is Ellipsis, which has deservedly gained widespread respect for its architectural guides. These guides,
almost small enough to be hidden in the palm of one’s hand, and yet filled with stunning
photographs, have dealt until now mainly with recent architecture. However, they are rapidly
branching out into other areas, and are soon to include a guide to Italian gardens, and an ‘opinioned’
survey of New York’s museums and art galleries.
E. Appropriately, at a time when publishers are looking ever more favorably on quirky books, three
guides have recently appeared celebrating British quirkiness. One of these books is the enjoyable
Eccentric Britain, which directs travelers to follies, strange local customs, places associated with
famous eccentrics, and obscure museums. The monumental work Follies, Grottes and Garden
Buildings by Headley and Meulenkamp is a model to which all guidebooks should aspire. Scholarly
yet consistently entertaining, it is also clearly laid out and abundantly illustrated, making it the ideal
companion for any cultural tour of Britain. But or sheer eccentricity, there is nothing to beat the
Dutch author Pieter Boogaart the essence of Britain, and is transformed by his pen into a route as
exotic as the Golden Road to Samarkand. It is a book replete with witticisms, personal asides, and
cultural and historical gems.
What hasn't changed? The USDA still lacks the power to order the recall of contaminated meat. "Every other
defective product can be ordered off the market. Mandatory recall is important because under the current
voluntary standard the company decides how much meat needs to be recalled and doesn't have to reveal
where the meat has been shipped," Schlosser says. He advises that we write our congressional
representatives in support of the SAFER Meat, Poultry, and Food Act and the Meat and Poultry Pathogen
Reduction Act, which would give the agency power to enforce limits on contaminants, order recalls and
impose fines. The meat industry says it cannot produce bacteria-free meat, so it's up to us to cook it until it's
safely well done (160° F) to kill E. coli. But the tainted food should not be getting to us in the first place.
The industrial food system produces force-fed, disease-prone animals and people. An estimated 120 million
Americans are overweight or obese. McDonald's announced in September, 2002 that it would switch to
heart-healthier polyunsaturated vegetable oil, but that won't make the fries any less fattening. It's just a gloss
on the system in which, through their massive purchasing and marketing power, giant companies control
how our food is produced, from seed to feed to processing. As Wilhelm says of the big meat processors who
buy from megafarms, "They say that we consumers want this pork and they need it to come from one place
to be efficient. "It's time we consumers made it clear that industrial farms, fast foods and their costly
"efficiencies" are not what we want.
Excerpted from Mindy Pennybacker, "Why Fast Food Costs Too Much”
(40%)
(21%)
(14%)
(14%)
(11%)
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………