Comprehensive Guide To Writing A Research Proposal
Comprehensive Guide To Writing A Research Proposal
iv. Failure to develop a coherent and persuasive argument for the proposed research;
v. Failure to stay focused on the research question; going off on unrelated tangents;
vi. Imprecise writing;
vii. Poor grammar; and
viii. Too much detail on minor issues, but not enough detail on major issues.
The Proposal Writing Process
Research proposals are generally organized the same way as the traditional research paper
throughout the social sciences. Most proposals are usually between ten (10) and fifteen (15) pages
in length. However, before the commencement of the proposal writing, the following information
below should be studied, as they are specific requirements for organizing and writing the proposal.
The researcher should be able to answer these questions:
i. What do I want to study, and why?
ii. Is it in-line with my area of specialization?
iii. What problems will it help solve?
iv. How does it build upon or go beyond research already conducted on the subject matter?
v. What exactly should I plan to do?
vi. Can I get it done in the time available?
In the end, the research proposal should reflect enthusiasm for conducting the study. It should be
conducted with the convincing the readers on the exciting idea.
In general the proposal should include the following sections:
Research Proposal Writing: Introduction
In the real world of higher education, a research proposal is most often written by scholars seeking
grant funding for a research project or it is the first step in getting approval to write a dissertation.
Introduction is the initial pitch of an idea. After reading the introduction, the readers should not only
have an understanding of what is the research is set to achieve, but they should also be able to sense
the writers’ passion for the topic and be excited about its possible outcomes.
Think about the introduction as a narrative written in one to three paragraphs that succinctly
answers the following four questions:
i. What is the key research problem?
ii. How is the topic of study related to that problem?
iii. What methods should be used to analyze the research problem?
iv. Why is the topic important to research on and why should someone reading the proposal
care about the outcomes from the study?
Research Proposal Writing: Background and Significance
This section can be fused into the introduction or a separate section can be created to help with the
organization and flow of research proposal. This is where the context of the research, outline and
importance can be explained. Writing this section should be approached with the thought that the
readers cannot be assumed to know much about the research problem as the researcher does. This
BUTY RESEARCH HELP DESK
section is not an essay on the research problem; instead, the relevant things should be explained in-
line with the objectives for the study.
To this end, while there are no hard and fast rules, some of the following should be addressed:
i. State the research problem and give a more detailed explanation about the purpose of the
study than what was stated in the introduction;
ii. Present the rationale of the proposed study and clearly indicate why it is worth doing.
Answer the "So what question”;
iii. Describe the major issues or problems to be addressed by the research;
iv. Clearly identify the key sources to use and explain how they will contribute to the analysis
of the research;
v. Set the boundaries of the proposed research in order to provide a clear focus; and
vi. Provide definitions of key concepts or terms, if necessary.
Research Proposal Writing: Literature Review
A literature review should be properly connected to the background and significance of the study. It
is a more deliberate review and synthesis of prior studies related to the research problem under
investigation. The purpose here is to place the research within the larger whole of what is currently
being explored, while demonstrating to the readers that the research is original and innovative. It is
pertinent to think about what questions other researchers have asked, what methods they have used,
and what is the understanding of their findings. There is need to examine what seems to be missing,
and state how previous research has failed to examine the issue that this present study addresses.
Since a literature review is information dense, it is crucial that this section is intelligently structured
to enable a reader to grasp the key arguments underpinning the study in relation to that of other
researchers. A good strategy is to break the literature into “conceptual review, theoretical review,
empirical review and conceptual framework” [themes] rather than systematically describing
materials one at a time.
The following will be useful in framing the literature review in a research proposal:
i. Keep the primary focus on the literature pertinent to the research problem.
ii. Compare the various arguments, theories, methodologies, and findings expressed in the
literature: what do the authors agree on? Who applies similar approaches to analyzing the
research problem?
iii. Contrast the various arguments, themes, methodologies, approaches and controversies
expressed in the literature: what are the major areas of disagreement, controversy, or debate?
iv. Critique the existing literature. Which arguments are more persuasive, and why? Which
approaches, findings, methodologies seem most reliable, valid, or appropriate, and why? Pay
attention to the verbs used to describe what an author says/does [e.g., asserts, demonstrates,
etc.].
v. Connect the literature to an area of research and investigation: how does the present research
draw upon, depart from, or synthesize what has been said in the literature?
BUTY RESEARCH HELP DESK
5. How might the results contribute to the solution of social, economic, environmental, or other
types of challenges?
6. Will the results influence policy decisions?
7. What will be improved or changed as a result of the proposed research?
8. How will the results of the study be implemented, and what innovations will emanate?
Research Proposal Writing: Conclusion
The conclusion reiterates the importance of proposal and provides a brief recap of the entire study.
It should be only one or two paragraphs long, emphasizing why the research study is unique, why it
advances knowledge, and why the research problem is worth investigating.
It should provide readers with the following:
1. Why the study was carried out;
2. The specific purpose of the study and the research questions it attempted to answer;
3. The research design and methods used;
4. The potential implications emerging from the proposed study of the research problem; and
5. A sense of how the study fits within the broader scholarship about the research problem.
Citations
As with any scholarly research paper, all the sources used in composing the proposal must be cited.
In a standard research proposal, there are two forms of citation (Krathwohl, 2005). The preferred
one depends on the format of each school.
1. References: This lists only the literature that is actually used or cited in the proposal.
2. Bibliography: This lists everything that is used or cited in a proposal with additional
citations of any key sources relevant to understanding the research problem.
In either case, citations should testify to the fact that enough preparatory work is carried out to make
sure the research will complement and not duplicate the efforts of other researchers (Punch &
Wayne, 2006).
Start a new page and use the heading "References" or "Bibliography" at the top of the page. Cited
works should always use a standard format that follows the writing style advised by the Research
Institute or discipline under which the research is carried out [History = Chicago; Education =
APA].
Note: This section normally does not count towards the total length of a proposal.
References
Krathwohl, D. R. (2005). How to Prepare a Dissertation Proposal: Suggestions for Students in
Education and the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Punch, K., & Wayne, M. (2006). Developing and Writing a Research Proposal. In From
Postgraduate to Social Scientist: A Guide to Key Skills. Nigel Gilbert, ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage), 59-81.
BUTY RESEARCH HELP DESK