Optimal Monetary Policy - Lecture Notes
Optimal Monetary Policy - Lecture Notes
s.t.
Curva de Phillips
πt = βEt πt+1 + λxt + ut (P hillips Curve) (2)
where:
1.1.1 Discretion:
Opt.
∞
( )
1 X
k 2
max V = − Et β (πt+k + αx2t+k ) (4)
2
k=0
s.a.
Curva de Phillips
πt = βEt πt+1 + λxt + ut (5)
1. Solution:
∞
( )
1 X
k
h
2
i
V = − Et β (βEt+k πt+k+1 + λxt+k + ut+k ) + αx2t+k
2
k=0
∂V
= 0 =⇒ 2(βEt+k πt+k+1 + λxt+k + ut+k )λ + 2αxt = 0
∂xt+k
1
2λπt+k + 2αxt+k = 0
λ
xt = − πt (6)
α
plugging eq.(6) into the Phillips curve eq.(5):
−λ
πt = βEt πt+1 + λ( πt ) + ut
α
λ2
πt (1 + ) = βEt πt+1 + ut
α
we get:
βEt πt+1 ut λ2
πt = + ; α0 = 1 + (7)
α0 α0 α
Solution through undetermined coefficients:
Conjecture:
πt = η1 ut (8)
βη1 ρ + 1
πt = ( )ut = η1 ut (9)
α0
so, we have our tentative solution must be equal to our conjecture (eq.(8)=eq.(9))
βη1 ρ + 1
= η1
α0
so:
1
η1 =
α0 − βρ
now, as we know the solution of η we can replace its value into our initial conjecture
1 1
πt = ut =⇒ πt = λ 2 ut
α0 − βρ 1 + α − βρ
2
Solution of Inflation:
α
πt = ut (10)
λ2 + α(1 − βρ)
using eq.(6):
λ
xt = − πt
α
λ α
xt = − ut
α λ2 + α(1 − βρ)
3
so
1 1
αρqut + λ(1 − ρ)q ut + gt = it
φ φ
λ(1 − ρ)
it = γπ Et πt+1 + σgt where γπ = 1 + >1 (14)
ραφ
1.2 Commitment
Let’s consider a rule for the target variable xt that is contingent on the fundamental shock ut
1. Solution
replacing eq.(15) into the Phillips curve:
πtc = η2 ut
c
πt+1 = η2 ut+1 ut+1 = ρut + ût+1
ut (βη2 ρ + 1 − λw) = η1 ut
1 − λw = η2 (1 − βρ)
1 − λw
η2 =
1 − βρ
so, we have:
4
1 − λw
πtc = ut (16)
1 − βρ
∞
( )
c 1 X
k 2
max V = − Et β (πt+k + αx2t+k )
2
k=0
∞
( 2 ) ( )
c 1 1 − λw X
k
V = − σu2 + αw 2
Et β
2 1 − βρ
k=0
∞
( X
)
∂V 1 2 1 − λw −λ k
= − σu 2 + 2αw Et β =0
∂w 2 1 − βρ 1 − βρ
k=0
1 − λw λ
= αw
1 − βρ 1 − βρ
λ − λ2 w = αw(1 − βρ)2
λ = w α(1 − βρ)2 + λ2
λ
w∗ = (17)
α(1 − βρ)2 + λ2
α(1 − βρ) αc
πtc = ut = ut , αc ≡ α(1 − βρ) < α
λ2 + α(1 − βρ)2 λ2 + αc (1 − βρ)
to get the solution of the output gap, we need to replace the value of w∗ into eq.(15):
xct = −wut
λ(1 − ρ)
it = γπc Et πt+1 + σgt where γπc = 1 + >1 (19)
ραc φ
5
1.3 Comparison
2 2
α(1−βρ) α(1−βρ) α α
πtc = c
λ2 +α(1−βρ)2 ut ⇒var(πt ) = λ2 +α(1−βρ)2 σu2 πt = λ2 +α(1−βρ) ut ⇒var(πt ) = λ2 +α(1−βρ) σu2
2 2
−λ λ −λ λ
xct = λ2 +α(1−βρ)2 ut ⇒var(xct ) = λ2 +α(1−βρ)2 σu2 xt = λ2 +α(1−βρ) ut ⇒var(xt ) = λ2 +α(1−βρ) σu2
var(πtc ) var(π c )
so: var(xct ) = (1 − βρ)2 var(π t)
var(xt ) and taking into account that (1 − βρ) < 1; thus: var(xct ) <
t var(πt )
var(xt )
c 1 1
it = γπ Et πt+1 + φ gt it = γπ Et πt+1 + φ gt
c λ(1−ρ) λ(1−ρ)σ
γπ = 1 + ραc φ > γπ = 1 + ραφ
So, we can conclude that the interest rate is higher under commitment.