SOCHUM
SOCHUM
Dear Delegates,
We, the Executive Board members, are eagerly waiting to meet you all in the first session of
Udayan Model United Nations 2023. We hope that all of you are preparing rigorously for the
conference. We hope all of you can showcase your diplomacy skills blended with your
knowledge and skills. We expect you to have your thoughtful arguments and conclusions
rehearsed and revised well before presenting them to us.
We encourage you to review this study guide and familiarize yourself with the agenda, its
background, the stances of major nations, and the potential solutions to the issue at hand.
Furthermore, we want to remind all delegates of the importance of ethical conduct throughout
the conference. We expect all delegates to demonstrate integrity, professionalism, and respect
towards the opinions of fellow delegates while engaging in diplomacy and negotiation.
We wish you all the best for UMUN 2023. We will try our level best to provide any kind of
assistance and utmost guidance to all of you. If you have any queries, feel free to reach out to
any of the Executive Board members.
Warm regards,
Email: [email protected]
1 | Page
About United Nations
The United Nations is an international organization founded in 1945. Currently made up of
193 Member States, the UN, and its work are guided by the purposes and principles
contained in its founding Charter. The UN has evolved to keep pace with a rapidly changing
world over the years. But one thing has stayed the same: it remains the one place on Earth
where all the world’s nations can gather together, discuss common problems, and find shared
solutions that benefit all of humanity.
2 | Page
Committee Mandate
The mandate of SOCHUM is to promote and protect human rights, ensure gender equality,
combat discrimination, address the needs of refugees and displaced persons, and promote
sustainable development.
The UN Charter states that SOCHUM's purpose is to address issues pertaining to social,
humanitarian, and cultural affairs. This includes fostering social development, upholding
human rights, and maintaining cultural diversity. The specific duties of SOCHUM are
outlined in Articles 55 and 56 of the UN Charter.
3 | Page
Core Procedure of the Committee
As a part of the UN General Assembly (UNGA), the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural
Committee (SOCHUM) is in session simultaneously with the General Assembly. It accepts
reports from Special Rapporteurs, Special Representatives, Working Groups, and other
Special Procedures and from the Human Rights Council.
The General Assembly occupies a central position as the chief deliberative, policymaking,
and representative organ of the United Nations. Composed of all 193 Members of the United
Nations, it provides a unique forum for multilateral discussion of the full spectrum of
international issues covered by the Charter. It also plays a central role in the process of
standard-setting and the codification of international law.
Agenda Overview
Reviewing Stigma as the Barrier to Implementing Social Development
Policies and Programs for People with Disabilities Worldwide
One of the most persistent challenges in global social development is the effective
implementation of policies and programs aimed at improving the lives of people with
disabilities. Despite significant progress in recognizing this population's rights and needs,
stigma remains a persistent barrier to their full inclusion and empowerment. Stigma, which
includes negative attitudes, beliefs, and stereotypes, is a formidable barrier that undermines
the effectiveness of social development initiatives aimed at people with disabilities around
the world.
4 | Page
variety of ways, has far-reaching effects on numerous facets of life, and limits the
effectiveness of efforts to improve the well-being and participation of disabled people in
society.
People with disabilities are frequently marginalized and excluded as a result of stigma, which
is rooted in societal misconceptions and discriminatory attitudes. This exclusion perpetuates a
cycle of disadvantage, making it challenging for them to access education, healthcare,
employment, and social participation. As a result, the potential positive outcomes of
development policies aimed at addressing these disparities are severely jeopardized.
Stigma has a significant impact on the psychological and emotional well-being of disabled
people, leading to self-doubt, shame, and internalized ableism. This emotional turmoil
undermines self-esteem, aspirations, and personal development, perpetuating the stigma that
caused it. The cycle of discrimination and personal growth is further exacerbated by the cycle
of negative attitudes.
The widespread stigma associated with disabilities frequently leads to an unfair allocation of
resources within society. Policies and programs that help people with disabilities may be
unfairly given lower priority status compared to other matters. As a result, these programs
frequently struggle with insufficient funding and inadequate staffing. The consequences of
this unequal distribution of resources can be severe, reducing the effectiveness and scope of
initiatives aimed at assisting those with disabilities. The propensity to undervalue disabilities
5 | Page
can result in a vicious cycle of underfunding, understaffing, and constrained program
development. The potential for such programs to promote inclusivity and empowerment is
hampered as a result. Minimizing the significance of issues related to disabilities impedes
efforts to create a society that is fair and equitable and adds to systemic disparities.
Stigma's ramifications reverberate through the realms of education and employment, erecting
formidable barriers. Educational institutions and employers, influenced by societal bias,
frequently question the abilities of people with disabilities. This widespread skepticism leads
to limited access to inclusive educational settings and appropriate employment opportunities,
resulting in a frustrating cycle of exclusion that restricts personal and professional
growth. Preconceived notions may cause educational institutions to overlook the potential of
students with disabilities, denying them the inclusive learning environments they require to
thrive. This denies them the opportunity to develop the necessary skills and knowledge,
thereby shortening their educational journey. Similarly, employers may be hesitant to offer
suitable job opportunities to people with disabilities, erroneously assuming their inability to
6 | Page
excel in a variety of roles. As a result, these individuals find their ambitions thwarted and
their skills underutilized. This continuing exclusion impedes personal development and
deprives society of diverse viewpoints and abilities. It perpetuates a cycle in which people
with disabilities are prevented from reaching their full potential due to a lack of access to
meaningful employment and high-quality education.
Stigma is a pernicious force that creates a distressing landscape of social isolation and
discrimination. Individuals with disabilities face exclusion, targeted harassment, and subtle
slights known as microaggressions, which all combine to create formidable barriers to their
integration. This disheartening cycle of social isolation, fueled by these prejudiced attitudes,
limits their participation in communal endeavors and stymies the formation of genuine
connections. People with disabilities may find themselves excluded from community events
due to the exclusionary nature of stigma, which exacerbates their feelings of disconnection.
The agony of marginalization becomes worse by the pervasiveness of bullying and
microaggressions, which perpetuate a hostile environment that limits their sense of
belonging. Discrimination of this kind denies them the fundamental right to engage and
interact with their surroundings on an equal footing. While this isolation is extremely harmful
on an individual level, it also has societal consequences. People with disabilities' potential
contributions and unique perspectives go undiscovered, limiting community enrichment and
collective growth.
Even in the area of decision-making, the stigmatization of people with disabilities has a
pervasive effect. Because of this marginalization, their voices are effectively silenced in the
very processes that have a direct impact on their lives. Their distinctive viewpoints and
first-hand experiences, which are invaluable in forming receptive policies and programs, are
frequently ignored. This disregard results in initiatives being implemented that are not in line
with their actual needs, preferences, and aspirations. The influence of stigma on
decision-making feeds a downward spiral of exclusion, depriving individuals with disabilities
of agency and rendering their insights inconsequential. The development of policies that
7 | Page
could genuinely empower and support them is hampered by this discrepancy. By excluding
them from decisions that directly affect them, society feeds a cycle of dependency and
inadequacy. The costs of exclusion are borne not only by those with disabilities but also by
society as a whole. A truly inclusive and equitable society requires that all of its members'
voices, regardless of ability, be heard and heeded.
The ubiquitous force of stigma often forces people with disabilities to avoid seeking help out
of fear of being judged or labeled. This avoidance leads to a troubling trend of underreporting
disabilities and underutilization of available services. As a result, the data required for
informed policy planning and resource allocation becomes skewed and untrustworthy. Fear of
being labeled as "different" or "inadequate" can contribute to a climate of secrecy
surrounding disabilities. People's reluctance to disclose their needs prevents them from
gaining access to critical support systems that could improve their quality of life. As a result,
the data collected and used for policymaking is inaccurate, resulting in ill-informed and
ineffective policies and resource distribution strategies. Underreporting and underutilization
not only perpetuate an endless cycle of disadvantage for individuals with disabilities but also
impede societal progress. A thorough understanding of the issues confronting this
demographic is essential for creating inclusive environments and developing targeted
interventions.
The rampant impact of stigma is visible in policy formulation, which frequently fails to align
with the genuine needs and preferences of people with disabilities. Decision-makers with
biased perspectives may inadvertently craft policies that are either patronizing or overly
restrictive. This well-intentioned but misguided approach undermines individuals with
disabilities' autonomy and independence, creating an atmosphere of disempowerment. The
influence of stigma on policy development is visible in the paternalistic tendencies that can
emerge. Policies influenced by such attitudes may unintentionally treat people with
disabilities as passive recipients of care, ignoring their ability to make choices and decisions.
This approach promotes a culture of dependence rather than independence and
8 | Page
self-determination. Additionally, stigma-influenced policies may be overly restrictive,
limiting opportunities and suffocating growth. These policies frequently fail to take into
account the diverse capabilities and aspirations of people with disabilities, limiting their
ability to make meaningful contributions to society.
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is an international human rights
treaty of the United Nations intended to protect the rights and dignity of persons with
disabilities. Parties to the convention are required to promote, protect, and ensure the full
enjoyment of human rights by persons with disabilities and ensure that persons with
disabilities enjoy full equality under the law.
The Convention follows decades of work by the United Nations to change attitudes and
approaches to persons with disabilities. It takes to a new height the movement from viewing
persons with disabilities as “objects” of charity, medical treatment, and social protection to
viewing persons with disabilities as “subjects” with rights, who are capable of claiming those
rights and making decisions for their lives based on their free and informed consent as well as
being active members of society. This Convention serves as a major catalyst in the global
disability rights movement enabling a shift from viewing persons with disabilities as objects
of charity, medical treatment, and social protection towards viewing them as full and equal
members of society, with human rights.
The Convention is intended as a human rights instrument with an explicit, social development
dimension. It adopts a broad categorization of persons with disabilities and reaffirms that all
9 | Page
persons with all types of disabilities must enjoy all human rights and fundamental freedoms.
It clarifies and qualifies how all categories of rights apply to persons with disabilities and
identifies areas where adaptations have to be made for persons with disabilities to effectively
exercise their rights in areas where their rights have been violated, and where protection of
rights must be reinforced.
The Strategy enables the UN system to support the implementation of the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities and other international human rights instruments, as well
as the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, the Agenda for Humanity, and the
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.
Through the Strategy, the organizations of the United Nations system reaffirm that the
complete realization of the human rights of all persons with disabilities is an inalienable,
integral, and indivisible part of all human rights and fundamental freedoms. The policy
establishes a vision and commitment for the United Nations system on the inclusion of
persons with disabilities.
10 | Page
Stances of Some Nations
Addressing the stigma associated with disabilities is a critical challenge in the global pursuit
of inclusive social development. Countries approach this barrier by the implementation of
policies and programs for people with disabilities. Understanding the various positions taken
by different countries is critical for creating an environment where individuals of all abilities
can thrive and contribute to the advancement of society.
United States:
In the US, stigma remains a significant barrier to implementing social development policies
and programs for people with disabilities. Negative attitudes, stereotypes, and beliefs obstruct
access to education, employment, and healthcare, often leading to social isolation and a
negative self-image. These biases can be reinforced by media portrayal. While legislation like
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) addresses discrimination, persistence of stigma
poses ongoing challenges to individuals with disabilities' full inclusion and well-being.
Russia:
Stigma as a barrier to implementing social development policies for people with disabilities
in Russia involves challenges rooted in negative attitudes, limited accessibility, and
exclusion. The law "On the Social Protection of Disabled People in the Russian Federation"
is critical in providing this community with rights and assistance. Negative stereotypes
impede employment, education, and social integration, despite legal safeguards. To combat
stigma, awareness campaigns, inclusive policies, and collaboration with non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) are essential. While progress has been made, more efforts are needed
to promote inclusivity, eliminate misconceptions, and foster an environment that allows for
the effective implementation of policies that benefit people with disabilities.
Japan:
Stigma has historically hampered the implementation of disability-related social development
policies in Japan. Discrimination and negative stereotypes have resulted in limited
opportunities and exclusion. Legal frameworks, awareness campaigns, inclusive employment
initiatives, and universal design concepts are all being used to combat these challenges. The
Tokyo 2020 Paralympics highlighted the abilities of people with disabilities and promoted
diversity. While progress has been made, creating an inclusive society is still a work in
progress.
11 | Page
QARMA(s)
QARMAs refer to ‘Questions A Resolution Must Answer’. These are areas of concern and
priority that the committee must address and discuss in order to reach a fruitful solution. For
our committee at this conference, the QARMAs are as follows:
These questions will guide the committee toward practical solutions that can address stigma
as a barrier to implementing social development policies and programs for people with
disabilities worldwide. The delegates have to encompass awareness, access, collaboration,
legal frameworks, and accountability as crucial components of the solution.
12 | Page
Further Research
To aid your research process, here are some useful resource links that you should thoroughly
study to prepare for the conference:
Please note that this study guide is just a starting point for your research. To ace in the
committee, you have to do further in-depth research to fully understand your country's stance,
the scope of the committee, and the agenda.
13 | Page