View Marking Scheme - Aspx
View Marking Scheme - Aspx
1 – Main Solution
Computation of total income and tax liability of Mr. Sahil for A.Y. 2024-25
as per books of accounts
Particulars Rs. Rs. Marks
I Income from house property
Annual value of self-occupied property Nil
Less: Deduction 1
1
under section 24(b)
2
under section 40A(2)
3
under section 40A(3)
4
as per section 43B
5
13,47,500
[8% of sales i.e. Rs. 43,50,000 x 8%5 assuming entire amount of 3,48,000 ½
sales are not received by A/c payee cheque or A/c payee draft or
ECS or other electronic prescribed modes]
5
If it is assumed that the entire sales are received by A/c payee cheque or A/c payee draft or ECS or other
electronic prescribed modes on or before due date of filing return of income, the presumptive rate would be 6%.
6
As per section 71(3A)
7
as per section 69C
8
As per section 70(2)
6
Deduction under section 80G
Contribution to Prime Minister’s Relief Fund9 10,000 ½
1,10,000
Total Income 11,40,500
Tax Liability
Tax on LTCG of Rs. 25,000 u/s 112A [Exempt upto Rs. 1 lakh] Nil ½
Tax on winning from lotteries of Rs. 15,000 @30% 4,500 ½
Tax on unexplained expenditure of Rs. 48,000 @60% 28,800 ½
Tax on balance income of Rs. 10,52,500 at slab rate
Upto Rs. 2,50,000 Nil
From Rs. 2,50,001 to Rs. 5,00,000 @5% 12,500
From Rs. 5,00,001 to Rs. 10,00,000 @20% 1,00,000
From Rs. 10,00,001 to Rs. 10,52,500 @30% 15,750 1,28,250
1,61,550
Add: Surcharge @25% on tax on unexplained expenditure of Rs. 7,200
28,800
1,68,750
Add: Health and education cess @4% 6,750
Tax Liability 1,75,500 ½
.1 Step-4 2 marks
Q.1 Step-4 - 2 marks S4.-2m
Total Marks 15
Note to Examiner – Alternatively, it is possible to assume that the salary not recorded in the books of account
was an erroneous omission and the assessee has offered satisfactory explanation about the source of such
expenditure. In such a case, it would not be considered as deemed income and the same would be allowed as
deduction while computing business income on the basis of books of accounts. Accordingly, the relevant figures
and the marks allocation would be as under:
(i) Salary to Staff – (-)Rs.48,000 i.e. to be reduced while computing the income u/h PGBP on the
basis of books of accounts – ½ mark
(ii) Tax liability – Rs.1,23,084 or rounded off to Rs.1,23,080 – 1 mark *
Hence, due credit may be given to the candidate where he/she has specifically stated this assumption and
answered accordingly.
*Please note that in the main solution, ½ mark has been allotted for correctly computing Tax on unexplained
expenditure as Rs.28,800/- and a further ½ mark has been allotted for correctly computing Tax Liability as
Rs.1,75,500. However, where a candidate has made an assumption that the salary not recorded in the books
of account was an erroneous omission and the assessee has offered satisfactory explanation about the
source, then he/she is not required to compute Tax on unexplained expenditure i.e. Rs.28,800/-. Hence, in
such a case full 1 mark may be awarded where the candidate has correctly computed the tax liability as
Rs.1,23,084 or rounded off to Rs.1,23,080 under such assumption.
9
Assuming contribution is made otherwise than by way of cash
7
Alternate presentation of Step-1 and Step-2 in Main Solution – Solved by taking the
Sales / Turnover from business and then deducting the allowable expenditure for computing income
under the head Profits and gains of business or profession. In that case, the presentation of Step-1 and Step-
2 of the Main solution will change as under:
Computation of total income and tax liability of Mr. Sahil for A.Y. 2024-25
as per books of accounts
8
13,47,500
[8% of sales i.e. Rs. 43,50,000 x 8% assuming entire amount of
10 3,48,000 ½
sales are not received by A/c payee cheque or A/c payee draft or
ECS or other electronic prescribed modes]
Please note that there would be no change in Step-3 and Step-4 in case a candidate has solved the question
by taking the Sales / Turnover from business and deducted the allowable expenditure for computing income
under the head Profits and gains of business or profession.
10
If it is assumed that the entire sales are received by A/c payee cheque or A/c payee draft or ECS or other
electronic prescribed modes on or before due date of filing return of income, the presumptive rate would be 6%.
9
Answer to Q. 1 - Alternate Solution considering presumptive provisions under section 44AD
Computation of total income and tax liability of Mr. Sahil for A.Y. 2024-25
as per presumptive provisions under section 44AD
Particulars Rs. Rs. Marks
I Income from house property
Annual value of self-occupied property Nil
Less: Deduction 11
11
under section 24(b)
12
under section 40A(2)
13
under section 40A(3)
14
as per section 43B
10
13,47,500
[8% of sales i.e. Rs. 43,50,000 x 8%15 assuming entire amount of 3,48,000 ½
sales are not received by A/c payee cheque or A/c payee draft or
ECS or other electronic prescribed modes]
15
If it is assumed that the entire sales are received by A/c payee cheque or A/c payee draft or ECS or other
electronic prescribed modes on or before due date of filing return of income, the presumptive rate would be 6%.
16
As per section 71(3A)
17
as per section 69C
18
As per section 70(2)
11
Deduction under section 80G
Contribution to Prime Minister’s Relief Fund19 10,000 ½
1,10,000
Total Income 1,41,000
Tax Liability
Tax on LTCG of Rs. 25,000 u/s 112A [Exempt upto Rs. 1 lakh] Nil ½
Tax on winning from lotteries of Rs. 15,000 @30% 4,500 ½
Tax on unexplained expenditure of Rs. 48,000 @60% 28,800 ½
Tax on balance income of Rs. 53,000 Nil
33,300
Add: Surcharge @25% on tax on unexplained expenditure of Rs. 7,200
28,800
40,500
Add: Health and education cess @4% 1,620
Tax Liability 42,120 ½
.1 Step-4 2 marks
Q.1 Step-4 - 2 marks S4.-2m
Total Marks 15
Note to Examiner – Alternatively, it is possible to assume that the salary not recorded in the books of account
was an erroneous omission and the assessee has offered satisfactory explanation about the source of such
expenditure. In such a case, it would not be considered as deemed income and the same would be allowed as
deduction while computing business income on the basis of books of accounts.
However, in case of presumptive provisions, the assessee would be deemed to have been allowed all the
deductions / expenditures under section 30 to 38, therefore, no further deduction for salary paid shall be allowed to
him under presumptive provisions of section 44AD.
The relevant figures and the marks allocation would be as under:
(i) Salary to Staff – (-)Rs.48,000 i.e. to be reduced while computing the income u/h PGBP on the
basis of books of accounts – ½ mark
(ii) Tax liability – Rs.4,680 – 1 mark *
Hence, due credit may be given to the candidate where he/she has specifically stated this assumption and
answered accordingly.
*Please note that in the alternate solution i.e.as per presumptive provisions under section 44AD , ½ mark has
been allotted for correctly computing Tax on unexplained expenditure as Rs.28,800/- and a further ½ mark
has been allotted for correctly computing Tax Liability as Rs.42,120. However, where a candidate has made
an assumption that the salary not recorded in the books of account was an erroneous omission and the
assessee has offered satisfactory explanation about the source, then he/she is not required to compute Tax
on unexplained expenditure i.e. Rs.28,800/-. Hence, in such a case full 1 mark may be awarded where the
candidate has correctly computed the tax liability as Rs.4,680 under such assumption.
19
Assuming contribution is made otherwise than by way of cash
12
Alternate presentation of Step-1 and Step-2 in Alternate Solution – Solved by taking
the Sales / Turnover from business and then deducting the allowable expenditure for computing
income under the head Profits and gains of business or profession. In that case, the presentation of Step-1
and Step-2 of the Alternate Solution will change as under:
Computation of total income and tax liability of Mr. Sahil for A.Y. 2024-25
as per presumptive provisions under section 44AD
13
13,47,500
[8% of sales i.e. Rs. 43,50,000 x 8% assuming entire amount of
20 3,48,000 ½
sales are not received by A/c payee cheque or A/c payee draft or
ECS or other electronic prescribed modes]
Please note that there would be no change in Step-3 and Step-4 in case a candidate has solved the question
by taking the Sales / Turnover from business and deducted the allowable expenditure for computing income
under the head Profits and gains of business or profession.
20
If it is assumed that the entire sales are received by A/c payee cheque or A/c payee draft or ECS or other
electronic prescribed modes on or before due date of filing return of income, the presumptive rate would be 6%.
14
Answer to Q. 2 (a)
Note to Examiner – Regarding remuneration for services rendered in Malaysia, since the word used is
“remuneration”, due credit may also be given to the candidate who has assumed that such amount is taxable as
“Salaries” and provided the standard deduction of Rs. 50,000. Although such assumption is not required to be
specifically stated by the candidate, however, the marks are to be awarded only when the deduction is
clearly stated and also the taxable remuneration is shown as Nil. Consequently, total income in case of ROR
would be Rs. 4,70,000 instead of Rs.5,20,000.
Q.2(a) Step-1 - 2 marks S1.- 2m.
……….continued
15
. Answer to Q. 2 (a)….. continued from previous page
Deduction under section 80TTA - Interest on savings bank account subject 10,000 ½
to a maximum of Rs. 10,000
Total Income 4,52,000
Total Marks 6
16
Answer to Q. 2(b)
Marks
(i) ABC Limited is required to deduct tax at source under section 194-I @ 10% on rent of Rs. 75,000 per ½
month exclusive of GST component, since the aggregate rent of Rs. 9,00,000 during the financial year
exceeds the threshold limit of Rs. 2,40,000. ½
(Note to Examiner - Where a candidate has not computed TDS amount as Rs.90,000 but has clearly
stated that TDS is applicable on Rs.9,00,000 @ 10%, then ½ mark allocated for Rs.90,000 may still be
awarded).
(ii) XYZ Pvt. Ltd. is not required to collect tax at source on sale of car of Rs.4,00,000 to Mrs. Anju since its
value does not exceed Rs. 10 lakhs ½
However, it is required to collect tax at source u/s 206C(1F) @ 1% on the total sale consideration of ½
Rs.12 lakhs since the value of this car exceeds Rs. 10 lakhs.
(Note to Examiner - Where a candidate has not computed TCS amount as Rs.12,000 but has clearly
stated that TCS is applicable on Rs.12,00,000 only @ 1%, then ½ mark allocated for Rs.12,000 may
still be awarded)
Total Marks 4
17
Answer to Q.3(a)(i)
Accordingly, deemed dividend of Rs. 1,00,000 would be taxable in the hands of Mr.
Ravi under the head “Income from Other Sources” for the A.Y. 2024-25. ½
Answer to Q.3(a)(ii)
Total Marks 4
21
u/s 35(1)(i)
22
u/s 35(1)(iv)
23
u/s 35(1)(ii)
24
u/s 35(1)(iia)
25
u/s 35(1)(i)
18
Answer to Q. 3(b)
Computation of Taxable Capital Gains for A.Y.2024-25
Particulars Rs. Marks
19
Answer to Q.4(a)
Capital Gains
Short-term capital gain on sale of land 2,00,000
Less: Set-off of short-term capital loss on sale of listed equity shares 75,000 ½
1,25,000
Brought forward long-term capital loss is not allowed to be carried forward
and set-off, since return of income for the A.Y. 2018-19 was filed after the ½
due date of filing return of income.
(ii) Loss from owning and maintenance of race horses Rs.50,000, can be set-off against income ½
from income from owning and maintenance of race horses only. Thus, such loss would be
carried forward to subsequent assessment year. ½
(iii) Brought forward loss from house property can be set off only against income of house property.
Hence, remaining loss of Rs. 50,000 has to be carried forward to subsequent assessment year. ½
20
Answer to Q.4(b) [First Alternative]
Marks
(i) In this case, Mr. Aneesh is not required to file return of income, since his total income ½
does not exceed Rs. 3,00,000, being the basic exemption limit as per the default tax ½
regime u/s 115BAC, assuming Mr. Aneesh has not claimed any deduction u/s
54/54D/54EC or 54F and deduction allowable under Chapter VI-A.
(ii) In the present case, since Smt. Patel, a senior citizen has a TDS credit of Rs. 55,000,
which exceeds the threshold limit of Rs. 50,000, she is required to file her return of 1+½
income even if it is assumed that her total income does not exceed the basic exemption
limit.
(iii) In this case, since Mr. Ajit’s gross receipts from the profession of architect was
Rs. 12,00,000 for the P.Y. 2023-24, which is in excess of Rs. 10 lakhs, hence, he is 1
required to file his return of income though his total income is Rs. 2,25,000 which does ½
not exceed the basic exemption limit.
Q.4(b) (1st alternative) Step-1 - 4 marks S1.-4m.
Total Marks 4
Marks
The CBDT has, vide Notification No. 37/2022 dated 21.4.2022, inserted Rule 12AB to provide
that a person, other than a company or a firm, who is not required to furnish a return under
section 139(1), and who fulfils any of the following conditions during the previous year has to file
their return of income on or before the due date in the prescribed form and manner –
(i) if his total sales / turnover / gross receipts, as the case may be, in the business > Rs.
60 lakhs during the previous year; or 1
(ii) if his total gross receipts in profession > Rs. 10 lakhs during the previous year; or
1
(iii) if the aggregate of TDS and TCS during the previous year, in the case of the person, is ½
Rs. 25,000 or more.
However, a resident individual who is of the age of 60 years or more, at any time during
the relevant previous year (or senior citizen) would be required to file return of income
½
only, if the aggregate of TDS and TCS during the previous year, in his case, is Rs. 50,000
or more
(iv) the deposit in one or more Savings bank account of the person, in aggregate, is Rs. 50
lakhs or more during the previous year. ½+½
S1.-4m.
Q.4(b) (2nd alternative) Step-1 - 4 marks
Total Marks 4
21