Sudhir
Sudhir
For many people, the paintings of Raja Ravi Verma and the academic realist tradition propagated ‘n institutions lIke SIr J.J.School of
Art are stIll benchmarks of good art. Though ModernIst ~nd post-modernist art, with a distinct identity, have become established
in India today, its appreciation among the people has not evolved to the desired degree. In Maharashtra, all t~e Modern literary
movements have found eager readershIp, but correspondIng movements In visual arts have not found a similar response among
people. A view that there is an inherent contradiction between appreciating realism and appreciating modern art has contributed
to this feeling. But for a few exceptions, there has also been no concentrated effort to educate people about modern art, either
from artists or art-institutions. It would surely help the situation, if a wider critically appreciative viewership for the visual arts
develops.
Baburao Sadwelkar started a tradition of informative and critical writing about art in Marathi. The monographs on popular artists
of an earlier period being published these days are evidence of this. But similar writing on contemporary painters is yet to be
done. This exhibition of contemporary art titled ‘Expanding Horizons’ acquires importance in this context. The prime purpose of
this exhibition is, that people should feel connected to this form of art and they should develop an appreciation of it. For this, it is
necessary to show the evolution of art from the academic traditions of Sir J.J. School of Art to today’s post-modern currents. The
Bengal school and the Bombay school were two dominant currents in art during the preIndependence era. In the post-Indepen-
dence period, along with Mumbai and Kolkata, other centers like Baroda and Cholamandal developed.
The currents of Modernism began to be evident in India from the 1920’s and 30’s. Rabindranath Tagore and Abanindranath Tagore
brought new thinking about art to Bengal, while Charles Gerard, the Director of Sir J. J. School of Art introduced modernist con-
cepts through education in Mumbai. In 1922, an exhibition of German artists associated with the Bauhaus was held in Kolkata.
Indian audiences for the first time saw works of western Modernists like Vassily Kandmsky, LIonel Feininger and Paul Klee in this
exhibition. Around the same time, Indian artists in ‘Shantiniketan’ were also being exposed to art from the Far East. In the works of
artists like Vinayak Masoji, the influence of Chinese and Japanese art can be seen.
Amrita Sher Gil was an important presence on the Indian Art scene around this time. She attempted a synthesis of western mod-
ernism and traditional Indian art, and she became a symbol of the liberated woman at a time when probably even the phrase
‘women’s liberation’ was not coined. lamini Roy, starting out as an academic painter, turned first to impressionism and then to folk
art. In his folk art inspired line, we find the modernist principle of economy of expression. Nand’ll’ll Bose tried to make art ‘of the
people, for the people’. His work responded to current social and political realities, and in it we can see the birth of a National art,
bringing together classical and folk traditions as well as modernism.
Speaking about the situation in Maharashtra, the influence of Raja Ravi Verma has been paramount. Painting in an academic real-
ist style, Ravi Venna created images of Gods and Goddesses in a new form. He created history in print
making use of colour oleographs.
In the Sir J.J.School of Art, portraiture was always given prime importance. Artists like Pestonji Bomanji, A.X.Trindade and
S.L.Haldankar created a tradition of portraiture here. Ganpatrao Mhatre’s 1894 sculpture ‘To the Temple’ became an ideal to emu-
late. This sculpture of a young bride carrying small puja implements to the temple was a rare and beautiful synthesis of Western
principles of ideal anatomical proportions, and Indian traditional values of purity and inner grace. Unfortunately this tradition of
sculpture later became restricted and moribund in public memorials only.
[n the annals of Sir J.J.School of Art, Abalal Rehman is an artist who has a special place. [n his paintings like ‘Sandhyamath’ of 1915,
we see the influence of impressionism. The light in his landscapes is an expression of spiritual yearning.
Two artists of the next generation, Madhav Satwalekar and Shankar Palshikar became known for the balance they achieved
between academic realist training and a modernist viewpoint. [n Satwalekar’s paintings, within the framework of a realist struc-
ture we see the beauty of abstract colour harmonies and form. Palshikar brought in currents of folk culture into his work and also
explored abstraction through the principles of Indian philosophical concepts of Mantra and Tantra. Tyeb Mehta, Akbar Padamsee,
Jatin Das, Prabhakar Kolte, and many other artists acknowledge their debt to Palshikar as the teacher who introduced them to
new developments in Modern art in the 40’s and 50’s including the work of Paul Klee.
After independence, in the 50’s, there were rapid changes in the visual alis scene in India. S. H. Raza, K. H. Ara, M. F. Husain, Sadan-
and Bakre and H. A. Gade were all part of the Progressive Artists’ group that F.N.Souza established. Though
the group did not last very long, it performed an important function. It managed to break the shackles of the academic
tradition of the Sir J.J.School of Art. Of the six founders of the group, Husain has been the most prolific and experimental,
creating art in a variety of mediums. ~ue to his unconventional personality,
e has always been at the center of controversy and publicity. Raza began as a landscapist and then turned to an abstract style
based on tantric symbols. Like the progressive group in Mumbai, the Calcutta group also embraced western
rnodermsm whole heartedly.
In the 60’s and 70’s a new generation of artists came to the fore. The work of the first generation modernists showed only
an indirect connection to the current socio_ political situation, Or to Indian cultural traditions. Tn the 1960’s, tensions and deformi-
ties resulting from industrialization, cultural transformations and political instability became pressing concerns. To express these, a
new language was needed. Different currents were born out of this need, each exploring different aspects of modernism. 1.Swam-
inathan and other neo-tantric artists. K.C.S Panikkar and his group at Cholamandal, and the Baroda school were some of these
new currents. The influence of the Baroda school, and of Abstraction, have been the most lasting. There were of course, many
overlapping influences too. The artists’ village at Cholamandal in Tamilnadu was established by K.C.S. Panikkar in 1964. Panikkar,
and Swaminathan in Delhi, popularized the trend of using symbols from the Indian tradition like tantric symbols. Other artists like
G.R.Santosh developed this neo-tantric form of abstraction further. At the same time artists like Gaitonde, Ram Kumar and Laxman
Shreshta were pursuing a more pure form of abstraction.
The term Baroda School began to be applied to a group of artists who had come together in Baroda, either to study or to teach at
the M. S. University. K. G. Subramanyan, Bhupen Khakhar, Gulammohammed Sheikh are some of the artists considered to belong
to this group. But artists like Sudhir Patwardhan, Gieve Patel, Nalini Malani and Vivan Sundaram from M umbai or other parts of the
country, also came to be associated with the Baroda school because their work showed similar preoccupations. The depiction of
social reality through personal experience, the dissolution of the distinction between classical and popular art, and the explora-
tion of various possibilities of narration in painting were some of the characteristics of this group. Mention must be made here of
the artist Badri Narayan, who though not belonging to any group, has created rich neo-mythological narratives in his work.
After 1990, we see a new generation of post-modern artists exploring new media. A neW mental attitude has evolved from the
effects of globalization, terrorism and uncontrolled urbanization, and we see this expressed in installations and video works.
Ramkinkar Baij and Meera Mukherjee were the first sculptors to achieve a synthesis of Indian folk at1 and modernism. We see
a new embodiment of this synthesis in the work of G. Ravinder Reddy. From the modernism of Adi Davierwala and Piloo poch-
khanawala to the post-modern works of Valsan Kolleri and Subodh Gupta we see a complete transformatIon of the idea of
sculptuer itself.
Seeing this journey of Indian art from the age of modernism to post-modernism, we become aware of certain things. Today Indian
art has been able to create its own niche, on the vast international art scene. It has been possible, because it succeeds in keeping
the dialogue alive on both local and global levels. It has the capacity to address different needs, and levels of reality - self-discov-
ery, social reality with the ugly face of violence and the eternal quest of the spirit. This capacity has come from a critical under-
standing of the Indian classical tradition and folk traditions, and from diverse experimentation with narrative spaces and possibili-
ties. Indian art of today has also shown the strength to reject tradition when necessary.
The purpose of art, is documentation and decoration, on the primary level. The idealization of historical episodes and figures in
memorial sculpture, and recording of the life styles of different people are forms of documentation. The frescoes in the wadas or
mansions of the Peshwas of late Maratha period were a form of decoration. Expression of the individual experience of the artist
and interpretation of reality may be considered to be higher aspects of art. The works of Bhupen Khakhar, Gieve Patel and Prab-
hakar Barwe do not just record the superficial aspects of reality. They analyse and interpret the inner structures of that reality. To
appreciate contemporary art today, we must understand this new sensibility.