ETHICS

A Course Module for Ethics in Accounting

Compiled by: Mary Rose T. Aragon, LPT, DBA

A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

CONTENTS

Unit Page

I Introduction to Ethics in Accounting 2

II Ethical Theories and Frameworks 8

III Ethics and Professional Conduct in Accounting 25

IV Ethical Decision-Making Models 33

V Conflicts of Interest in Accounting 37

VI Ethics and Financial Reporting 42

VII Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics 47

VIII Fraud and Unethical Practices 53

IX Ethics in Taxation and Auditing 59

X Global Ethical Standards in Accounting 64

XI Ethical Leadership and Professional Responsibility 70

XII Review and Application of Ethical Theories 76

MRTA, 2025
1
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Introduction
In today’s complex financial landscape, the role of ethics in accounting has
never been more critical. This detailed module aims to illuminate the significance of
ethical practices within the accounting profession, exploring foundational ethical
theories and professional conduct that guide accountants in their daily responsibilities.
As stewards of financial information, accountants are faced with a myriad of
challenges that require sound decision-making frameworks to ensure integrity and
transparency in financial reporting. By delving into various ethical issues and real-
world scenarios, this module will equip participants with the knowledge and tools
necessary to navigate the intricate ethical dilemmas that arise in the field, ultimately
fostering a culture of accountability and trust in financial practices.

UNIT I: INTRODUCTION TO ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING

Learning Objective:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Define ethics and explain its significance in the context of accounting.

2. Describe the importance of ethics in maintaining transparency, accountability,
and trust in the accounting profession.
3. Identify and analyze key ethical issues commonly encountered in accounting
practices, such as conflicts of interest, fraud, and financial reporting integrity.

1.1. What is Ethics?

Ethics, often referred to as moral philosophy, is the philosophical study of moral

phenomena, focusing on what is considered right and wrong behavior. It investigates
normative questions about human conduct, obligations, and the principles that guide
moral evaluation. The term "ethics" has roots in the Ancient Greek word “ethos”,
meaning 'character' or 'disposition', and encompasses various branches, including
normative ethics, applied ethics, and metaethics.
Ethics is fundamentally concerned with well-founded standards of right and
wrong that prescribe how individuals ought to act, often emphasizing rights,
obligations, and societal benefits. It also involves a continuous examination of one's
moral beliefs and actions to ensure they align with reasonable ethical standards.
Thus, ethics refers to moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the
conducting of an activity. In accounting, ethics is concerned with ensuring that financial
information is reported truthfully and accurately, following established legal and
professional standards.

MRTA, 2025
2
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

1.2. Importance of Ethics in Accounting

Ethics plays a crucial role in accounting for several reasons:

Trust and Credibility. Ethical practices foster trust among stakeholders, including
investors, creditors, and customers. Accurate financial reporting relies on ethical
behavior to reflect the true financial health of a business.

Accuracy and Transparency. Ethical guidelines ensure that financial statements are
accurate and transparent. Accountants are expected to refrain from manipulating data
to present a misleading financial position.

Professional Integrity. Ethics in accounting establishes essential values such as

integrity, objectivity, confidentiality, and professional behavior. These principles guide
accountants in their daily operations and decision-making processes.

Legal Protection. Adhering to ethical standards helps safeguard businesses from

legal repercussions. Ethical accountants protect sensitive financial information from
unauthorized disclosure, mitigating risks associated with breaches of trust.

Long-term Success. Ethical behavior contributes to a positive organizational culture

and enhances the overall reputation of businesses. Companies known for their ethical
practices are more likely to achieve sustainable success and maintain strong
relationships with stakeholders.

1.3. Overview of Ethical Issues in Accounting

Despite the established ethical frameworks, several ethical issues persist in the
accounting profession:

Financial Misreporting
One of the most significant ethical dilemmas involves the manipulation of
financial statements to misrepresent a company's performance. This can lead to
severe consequences for stakeholders relying on accurate information.

Conflicts of Interest
Accountants may face situations where personal interests conflict with
professional responsibilities. This can compromise their objectivity and integrity when
providing financial advice or reporting.

Pressure from Management

Accountants often experience pressure from management to alter financial
reports or overlook unethical practices. This can create an environment where
unethical behavior becomes normalized.

Confidentiality Breaches
Maintaining confidentiality is a fundamental ethical principle in accounting.
However, breaches can occur when sensitive information is disclosed without proper
authorization.

MRTA, 2025
3
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Regulatory Compliance
Accountants must navigate complex regulations while ensuring compliance.
Ethical issues arise when there is a temptation to circumvent regulations for personal
or organizational gain.

In summary, ethics is a foundational aspect of accounting that ensures

accuracy, accountability, and trust within financial reporting. By adhering to ethical
standards, accountants not only uphold their professional integrity but also contribute
significantly to the stability and credibility of the financial system as a whole.

Case Study Analysis

Case 1:
A junior accountant faces a moral dilemma when asked to overlook a minor error in
financial reporting to meet a deadline.

Requirement: Discuss the scenario in a group and suggest how the junior accountant
should respond. Share findings with the class.

Rubric:
5 pts. – Collaboration: Works effectively in a group.
5 pts. – Quality of Examples: Provides clear and relevant solutions.
5 pts. – Presentation: Clearly presents findings to the class.

Instruction for Case 1: Moral Dilemma in Financial Reporting

Objective:
To analyze the moral dilemma faced by a junior accountant when asked to overlook a
minor error in financial reporting to meet a deadline. The goal is to discuss the situation
as a group, come up with ethical responses, and present findings clearly to the class.

Carefully read through the case, understanding the key issue: the junior accountant
is asked to overlook a minor error in the financial report to meet a tight deadline.

1. Discuss the potential moral and legal implications of overlooking a mistake, even if
it seems small.
What are the possible consequences of overlooking the error? How might this affect
the integrity of the company, the accountant’s professional reputation, and the
stakeholders relying on accurate financial reports?

2. Brainstorm possible actions the junior accountant can take, such as: Reporting the
error to a superior and asking for guidance. Offering alternative solutions to meet the
deadline without compromising accuracy. Adhering to professional codes of ethics
(e.g., honesty, integrity).

3. After discussing the options, come to a consensus on the most appropriate and
ethical course of action. Make sure your response aligns with the values of
accountability, transparency, and professionalism.

MRTA, 2025
4
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

4. Ensure that all group members have contributed

to the discussion and have a chance to voice their opinions.

5. Provide clear and relevant examples of how to approach the situation, drawing from
ethical guidelines or real-world situations if possible.

6. Prepare a 5–10-minute presentation where each group member presents a key

point, ensuring clarity, logical flow, and relevance to the scenario.

7. Deliver your findings to the class, explaining the moral dilemma, your group’s
discussion, and the recommended course of action for the junior accountant.

8. Be prepared to answer questions or engage in a brief discussion with the class

regarding your solution.

Case 2:
A well-known case where an accounting firm lost credibility and clients due to unethical
practices (e.g., Arthur Andersen and the Enron scandal).

Requirement: Identify the ethical issues and suggest how they could have been
avoided. Share findings with the class.
Rubric:
5 pts. – Identification of Issues: Accurately identifies key ethical issues.
5 pts. – Proposed Solutions: Provides thoughtful and practical solutions.
5 pts. – Participation: Actively participates in the discussion.

Objective:
To analyze a well-known ethical case in accounting (e.g., the Enron scandal and the
involvement of Arthur Andersen) and identify the ethical issues that led to the loss of
credibility and clients. The goal is to discuss the case as a group, identify the core
ethical problems, suggest ways those issues could have been avoided, and present
your findings to the class.

1. Research and review the Enron scandal and the role of Arthur Andersen in the
event. Focus on the unethical accounting practices that led to the firm's downfall,
including:
- Enron's use of off-balance-sheet special purpose entities (SPEs).
- Arthur Andersen’s involvement in shredding documents and overlooking fraudulent
practices.
- The broader ethical failures related to transparency, conflicts of interest, and
professional responsibility.

2. In your group, identify the ethical issues that were central to the scandal. Consider
questions like:
- Was there a breach of trust between the accounting firm and its clients?
- How did conflicts of interest contribute to the scandal?
- What role did lack of professional skepticism and due diligence play?

MRTA, 2025
5
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

- Were there any failures in corporate

governance, internal controls, or whistleblowing?
- Reflect on how these issues relate to broader accounting ethics and professional
standards (e.g., PICPA Code of Conduct, etc).

3. Brainstorm solutions to the ethical issues identified. Consider how these problems
could have been avoided or mitigated:
- What safeguards could have been put in place to prevent unethical practices (e.g.,
stronger internal controls, independent audits, ethical training)?
- How could Arthur Andersen have acted differently to maintain professional
integrity and avoid unethical conduct?
- What organizational changes could have promoted a culture of ethical
responsibility and transparency?
- Ensure your solutions are practical and could have realistically been implemented
at the time.

4. Be clear about the ethical issues you identified. Make sure you can explain how
these issues led to the downfall of both Enron and Arthur Andersen. Present your
solutions clearly, providing examples or strategies that could have been used to
prevent the unethical behavior. Each group member should actively contribute to the
discussion and presentation. Make sure all perspectives are included and heard.

5. Deliver your group's findings in a clear, organized presentation (5-10 minutes).

Ensure that each member of the group has a chance to present key points.
- Address the ethical issues you identified and explain the solutions you propose. Be
concise and direct.
- Be prepared to answer questions or engage in a brief class discussion after your
presentation.

Case 3:
An accountant who discovers that their company is hiding debt to appear more
financially stable and is pressured by management to stay silent.

Requirement: Role-Playing (e.g., accountant, manager, auditor). Have them act out
the scenario and discuss possible actions and outcomes. Debrief as a class.
Rubric:
5 pts. - Role-Playing: Effectively plays assigned role.
5 pts. - Understanding of Ethical Issues: Demonstrates understanding of ethical
issues.
5 pts. - Discussion: Actively participates in debrief discussion.

Instruction for Case 3: Ethical Dilemma – Hiding Debt to Appear Financially

Stable
Objective: To explore the ethical issues surrounding financial transparency and
corporate responsibility through role-playing. In this scenario, an accountant discovers
that their company is hiding debt to appear more financially stable and is pressured
by management to stay silent. The goal is to role-play the scenario from different
perspectives (e.g., accountant, manager, auditor), discuss possible actions, and
reflect on the ethical implications of each decision.

MRTA, 2025
6
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

In this case, an accountant uncovers that their company is intentionally hiding debt
in order to mislead stakeholders about its financial health. The management pressures
the accountant to remain silent, creating a moral and professional dilemma. Your task
is to explore the ethical challenges that arise in this situation.

1. You will be role-playing one of the following characters:

Accountant: The person who has discovered the debt concealment and is being
pressured to stay silent.
Manager: The individual pressuring the accountant to overlook the issue for the sake
of the company’s image or financial stability.
Auditor: A third-party professional who may be involved in uncovering or reporting
the issue.

(You can have multiple accountants, managers, or auditors.)

2. Role-Play the Scenario:

Accountant: Respond to the pressure from management. Consider the professional
and ethical responsibilities you have, including the obligation to report misleading
financial information. Think about how to balance your professional integrity with the
risk of retaliation or harm to your career.
Manager: Justify the company’s actions, emphasizing the perceived importance of
protecting the company’s reputation or meeting financial expectations. Try to persuade
the accountant to stay silent or delay action.
Auditor: Observe the conversation and offer your professional perspective,
considering the auditor’s responsibility to report material misstatements and uphold
ethical auditing standards.

3. After the role-play, each group will engage in a debrief discussion. Reflect on the
following:
- What ethical principles are at stake (e.g., honesty, integrity, transparency)?
- What are the potential legal consequences of hiding debt or staying silent?
- What alternative actions could the accountant take to address the situation? How
might they communicate their concerns with management or external authorities?
- What could the manager or auditor have done differently to ensure ethical conduct?

Each group member should actively contribute to the discussion, offering insights
into the scenario from their assigned role.

4. Class-wide Debrief:
After the role-playing sessions, the class will come together for a larger discussion
around these key points:
- What were the major ethical dilemmas in the scenario?
- How did each role handle the pressure, and what were the outcomes?
- What are the real-world implications of allowing financial misinformation to persist?
How might this affect stakeholders, the company, and the profession?
- What are the ethical responsibilities of accountants, managers, and auditors in
such situations?

MRTA, 2025
7
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

5. After the class-wide debrief, take a few minutes

to reflect on the ethical principles you learned from this case. How will you apply these
lessons to your future work as an accountant or financial professional?

Assignment:
Watch a short video clip about the Enron scandal or another notable case.
Present a few notable cases where ethical breaches in accounting had significant
consequences.

Reflective Essay
Write a short essay reflecting on what you have learned and how ethical
breaches impacted the companies involved.
Rubric:
5 pts. - Reflection: Provides thoughtful and insightful reflections.
5 pts. - Understanding: Demonstrates understanding of the case.
5 pts. - Writing Quality: Writes clearly and coherently.

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions.

1. What is the definition of ethics?

a) Principles and standards guiding right from wrong
b) Legal rules and regulations
c) Financial guidelines
d) Professional codes only
2. Why is ethics important in accounting?
a) To ensure legal compliance
b) To build trust and credibility
c) To guide decision making
d) All of the above
3. What is a conflict of interest?
a) When professional duties conflict with personal interests
b) When financial statements are falsified
c) When confidential information is shared
d) When legal guidelines are ignored
4. Misrepresentation of financial information occurs when:
a) Financial records are accurately reported
b) Financial records are falsified or altered
c) Financial data is kept confidential
d) Financial reports are audited
5. Confidentiality breaches in accounting involve:
a) Sharing sensitive information without authorization
b) Keeping financial data private
c) Correctly reporting financial information
d) Maintaining ethical standards

MRTA, 2025
8
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

6. Fraud in accounting involves:

a) Accurately reporting expenses
b) Deceptive practices for personal gain
c) Keeping financial records confidential
d) Following professional guidelines
7. Pressure from management can lead to:
a) Ethical behavior
b) Manipulating financial results
c) Following ethical guidelines
d) Proper financial reporting
8. The main ethical issue in the Enron scandal was:
a) Conflict of interest
b) Misrepresentation of financial information
c) Confidentiality breach
d) Legal compliance
9. A code of conduct in accounting outlines:
a) Financial regulations
b) Ethical behavior guidelines
c) Tax rules
d) Audit procedures
10. An ethical decision-making framework helps in:
a) Resolving financial disputes
b) Navigating ethical dilemmas
c) Auditing financial statements
d) Filing taxes
11. Ethical behavior builds trust and credibility by:
a) Ensuring honesty and transparency
b) Misrepresenting financial information
c) Keeping information confidential
d) Falsifying records
12. Professional integrity is crucial because:
a) It maintains reputation and trust
b) It leads to financial gain
c) It involves tax compliance
d) It avoids legal issues
13. Legal non-compliance can result in:
a) Financial penalties
b) Loss of reputation
c) Legal consequences
d) All of the above
14. Ethics guide decision making by:
a) Ensuring actions benefit stakeholders
b) Maximizing profits
c) Minimizing expenses
d) Following tax guidelines
15. An example of ethical behavior in accounting is:
a) Falsifying financial records
b) Reporting financial information accurately
c) Sharing confidential information
d) Ignoring ethical guidelines

MRTA, 2025
9
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

16. Define ethics.

17. Name one reason why ethics is important in accounting.
18. Describe a conflict of interest in accounting.
19. What constitutes misrepresentation of financial information?
20. Explain fraud in accounting.

References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics

https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-importance-of-ethics-in-accounting.html

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/what-is-ethics/

https://grdspublishing.org/index.php/people/article/download/235/197

https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/introduction/intro_1.shtml

https://auroratrainingadvantage.com/articles/ethics-in-accounting/

https://www.britannica.com/topic/ethics-philosophy

https://online.mason.wm.edu/blog/the-importance-of-ethics-and-professional-

standards-in-the-accounting-industry

MRTA, 2025
10
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT II: ETHICAL THEORIES AND FRAMEWORKS

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students should be able to:

1. Explain the key ethical theories — Utilitarianism, Deontology, and Virtue Ethics
— and describe how they apply to decision-making in accounting.
2. Analyze ethical dilemmas in accounting using the different ethical frameworks
(Utilitarianism, Deontology, Virtue Ethics) to determine appropriate actions.
3. Apply ethical decision-making models to real-world accounting scenarios,
assessing the potential consequences, duties, and character traits involved in
the decisions.
4. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each ethical theory in the context of
professional accounting practice.

Introduction

Ethics play a crucial role in the field of accounting, serving as a foundational

element that guides professionals in their decision-making processes. The key ethical
theories—Utilitarianism, Deontology, and Virtue Ethics—provide distinct frameworks
for evaluating moral dilemmas and determining appropriate actions in various
accounting scenarios.

Utilitarianism emphasizes the outcomes of actions, advocating for choices that

maximize overall happiness and benefit for stakeholders. In contrast, Deontology
focuses on the inherent morality of actions based on adherence to rules and duties,
insisting that accountants uphold ethical standards regardless of potential
consequences.

Meanwhile, Virtue Ethics highlights the importance of character and the

cultivation of personal virtues, encouraging accountants to act with integrity and
honesty. By analyzing ethical dilemmas through these lenses, accounting
professionals can navigate complex situations effectively while maintaining trust and
accountability within their practice. This discussion will explore these theories in depth,
analyze real-world ethical challenges in accounting, and evaluate the strengths and
weaknesses of each framework as they apply to professional conduct in the field.

MRTA, 2025
11
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

2.1.1. Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism is a well-known ethical theory developed by philosophers like
Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. At its core, utilitarianism is a consequentialist
theory, which means that the moral value of an action is determined by its outcomes.
In simple terms, the right action is the one that results in the greatest good for the
greatest number. This theory focuses on maximizing overall happiness and
minimizing harm for all involved.

Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory that posits that the moral worth
of an action is determined by its outcomes. The primary goal is to maximize overall
happiness or benefit for the greatest number of people. In accounting, this theory can
guide decision-making by evaluating the potential consequences of financial reporting
and auditing practices. For instance, when deciding whether to disclose certain
financial information, an accountant might consider which choice would benefit
stakeholders—such as investors, employees, and the community—most effectively.

In the field of accounting, utilitarianism can be a powerful guide for decision-

making. Accountants are often faced with choices that affect various stakeholders,
including shareholders, employees, the community, and even the environment. By
considering the consequences of their decisions, accountants can ensure that their
actions are aligned with the goal of promoting the greatest benefit to society as a
whole.

Principle of Utilitarianism best action is the one that maximizes the overall
"happiness" or "good" for the greatest number of people. In accounting, utilitarianism
could be used to justify financial decisions that benefit the majority of stakeholders
(e.g., shareholders, employees, customers), even if it causes some harm to a few
individuals.
Example: A company deciding to report a large financial loss accurately (even
if it causes short-term shareholder loss) because it ultimately serves the long-term
benefit of transparency.

Key Principles of Utilitarianism:

1. Greatest Happiness Principle: The best action is the one that brings the most
happiness or well-being to the greatest number of people. This is often
considered the central tenet of utilitarianism.
2. Impartiality: Every individual's happiness is considered equal. There is no
preference for one person’s well-being over another's.
3. Consequentialism: The morality of an action is judged based on its outcomes,
rather than intentions or inherent nature.

How Utilitarianism Applies to Accounting:

In accounting, utilitarianism can be used as a decision-making framework.
Accountants regularly face decisions that affect various stakeholders, and those
decisions may involve trade-offs between competing interests. For example, a
decision to disclose or withhold certain financial information can have significant
implications for investors, employees, and even the broader community.

MRTA, 2025
12
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Examples of Decision-Making in Accounting:

1. Financial Reporting and Transparency: Accountants might be faced with a
decision about whether to disclose certain financial information. From a
utilitarian perspective, disclosing the information could benefit investors by
providing transparency, enabling them to make more informed decisions.
However, it could harm the company in the short-term by affecting stock prices.
Here, utilitarianism asks whether the long-term benefits of transparency (such
as maintaining trust in the financial system) outweigh the short-term harm to
the company.
2. Cost-Cutting Measures: Another scenario could involve an accountant
recommending layoffs to cut costs. This decision may benefit the company’s
profitability and shareholders in the short term but could cause significant harm
to employees and their families. A utilitarian approach would ask whether the
harm caused to employees is justified by the overall benefit to shareholders
and the business. A more balanced solution might involve cost-saving initiatives
that avoid layoffs, such as restructuring or improving efficiency, which would
reduce harm to employees while still achieving financial goals.
3. Ethical Dilemmas in Taxation: Accountants may also face decisions related
to tax avoidance. While minimizing tax payments could benefit the company’s
bottom line and shareholders, it may also lead to a reduction in public services
that depend on tax revenues. From a utilitarian point of view, the accountant
must consider whether the benefit to the company and its shareholders justifies
the harm done to society at large.

Utilitarianism's Strengths in Accounting:

1. Practical Application: Utilitarianism provides a clear and measurable
approach for making decisions. By focusing on the consequences, accountants
can systematically evaluate the potential impacts of their actions on various
stakeholders.
2. Promoting Transparency: Utilitarianism encourages transparency and
honesty because disclosing accurate financial information can lead to better
decision-making and increased trust in financial markets.
3. Focus on Long-Term Impact: While utilitarianism considers both short-term
and long-term consequences, it often favors long-term benefits over short-term
gains, which can lead to more sustainable practices in accounting.

Challenges of Applying Utilitarianism in Accounting:

1. Difficulty in Measuring Happiness: A core challenge of utilitarianism is that it
can be difficult to measure or predict the happiness or well-being of different
stakeholders. In accounting, while the financial impacts can often be measured
in numbers, the emotional or social consequences may be harder to quantify.
2. Conflicting Interests: Stakeholders in accounting decisions often have
competing interests. For instance, a decision that benefits shareholders might
harm employees, and vice versa. Utilitarianism does not provide an easy
solution to balancing these conflicting interests, which can make decision-
making difficult.

MRTA, 2025
13
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

3. Risk of Justifying Harm: In some cases, utilitarianism could potentially justify

harm to a minority group if it benefits the majority. For example, an accountant
may decide that mass layoffs are acceptable if it helps save the company, even
though it harms the employees. This raises ethical concerns about whether
utilitarianism always leads to the most ethical decisions.

Questions for Discussion

1. Balancing Stakeholders’ Interests:
o In cases where the interests of different stakeholders conflict, how
should an accountant apply utilitarian principles? For example, if
disclosing financial difficulties could harm employees but benefit
investors, how should an accountant weigh those competing interests?
2. Transparency vs. Profit Maximization:
o Should accountants always prioritize transparency, even if it harms the
company’s short-term profits? In the long run, does transparency lead to
greater benefits for the greatest number, or is profit maximization more
important?
3. Social Responsibility:
o Can accountants justify actions that benefit shareholders at the expense
of other stakeholders (like the community or environment)? For example,
if an accountant supports a decision to avoid taxes to benefit
shareholders, how might this decision harm the broader society? Is this
justifiable from a utilitarian perspective?
4. Ethical Dilemmas in Accounting:
o Are there cases where utilitarianism might justify unethical practices in
accounting, such as financial manipulation or misleading reporting? How
should accountants navigate these ethical challenges while trying to
maximize overall good?
5. Long-Term vs. Short-Term Consequences:
o How should an accountant account for both short-term and long-term
consequences when making decisions? Can the harm caused in the
short term be justified if it leads to greater benefits in the long term?

Conclusion

In conclusion, utilitarianism provides a valuable framework for accountants

when making decisions that affect multiple stakeholders. It encourages them to
consider the outcomes of their actions and to aim for the greatest overall benefit.
However, it also presents challenges, such as the difficulty of quantifying happiness
and balancing competing interests. By engaging in discussions about these issues,
students will gain a deeper understanding of how ethics and utilitarian theory intersect
with accounting practices and decision-making.
In this discussion, students will not only learn about utilitarianism as an ethical
theory but also how it applies to real-world ethical dilemmas in accounting, helping
them think critically about their own decision-making processes in professional
contexts.

MRTA, 2025
14
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Case Study Analysis

Each group will use the principles of Utilitarianism to propose a
recommendation for the accountant in the case. Each will discuss the benefits and
harms for all stakeholders involved and justify their decisions based on maximizing the
greatest good.

Case 1: Disclosure of Financial Information

A company faces the decision of whether to disclose financial difficulties it is
facing. Disclosing this could harm the company’s stock price and the jobs of
employees in the short term but might be beneficial in the long term for investors who
can make informed decisions.
Should the accountant prioritize transparency for the long-term benefit of the
community and investors, or protect the company’s short-term interests to avoid
immediate harm to stakeholders?

Case 2: Cost-Cutting Measures

In order to save money, a company is considering laying off a portion of its
workforce. The immediate financial savings could benefit shareholders, but it would
harm the affected employees and their families. The company could also use
automation to save money without firing employees, which would have less emotional
and financial cost for employees but might result in other ethical questions.
Which decision would maximize the overall happiness or benefit, considering
both short-term and long-term impacts?

Case 3: Tax Avoidance Practices

A corporation uses legal methods to avoid paying taxes, which benefits
shareholders and boosts profits. However, the avoidance of taxes means fewer public
services and resources for the community, potentially harming the public at large.
Is it morally acceptable for the company to use tax avoidance strategies in the
name of maximizing benefits for its shareholders? Or should they consider the greater
social good?

Rubric for grading:

Needs
Unsatisfactory
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Improvement
(1)
(2)
Demonstrates a Shows a solid Demonstrates
deep understanding of basic Shows minimal
Understanding understanding of utilitarian understanding of understanding of
No understanding
of utilitarian principles but utilitarianism, but utilitarianism or
of utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism principles and may lack some with some applies it
their application to depth in confusion or incorrectly.
accounting. explanation. missing details.
Thoroughly Analyzes the Analysis is
Analysis is
analyzes all stakeholders and adequate but No meaningful
superficial,
Case Study stakeholders and consequences lacks depth or analysis; lacks
missing key
Analysis consequences; well, but some overlooks clear evaluation
considerations or
well-reasoned aspects could be important of consequences.
stakeholders.
conclusion. explored further. aspects.
Good application
Strong, clear Some application Little or no
of utilitarianism No application of
Application of application of of utilitarianism, application of
but with minor utilitarian
Utilitarianism utilitarian but rationale is utilitarianism to
errors or missing principles.
principles to justify weak or unclear. justify decisions.
justification.

MRTA, 2025
15
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Needs
Unsatisfactory
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Improvement
(1)
(2)
the decision
made.
Actively Rarely
Participates in the Participates
participates and participates in
discussion, minimally in Does not
Engagement contributes discussion and
contributing to discussion, participate in
and Teamwork valuable insights does not
some degree, but contributing only discussion.
to the group contribute
not consistently. when prompted.
discussion. meaningfully.
Organized and
Clear, well- clear, but may Presentation is Presentation is
organized, and lack some unclear or poorly disorganized,
No presentation
Presentation persuasive persuasive organized; with poor clarity
or extremely
and Clarity presentation with elements or arguments are and no clear
unclear.
strong supporting clarity in not well- supporting
arguments. supporting supported. arguments.
arguments.

Total Score:
• Excellent (21-25 points)
• Good (16-20 points)
• Satisfactory (11-15 points)
• Needs Improvement (6-10 points)
• Unsatisfactory (1-5 points)

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions.

1. What is the main focus of Utilitarianism?

a) The intentions behind an action
b) The consequences of an action
c) The moral character of the person performing the action
d) The adherence to moral laws and duties

2. Who are the key philosophers associated with the development of Utilitarianism?
a) Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Nietzsche
b) Aristotle and Socrates
c) John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham
d) René Descartes and David Hume

3. Which of the following is the central principle of Utilitarianism?

a) The greatest good for the greatest number
b) Following a set of moral rules regardless of outcomes
c) Pursuing individual happiness above all else
d) Fulfilling moral duties and obligations

MRTA, 2025
16
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

4. According to Utilitarianism, the right action is

one that:
a) Is performed according to societal rules and traditions
b) Results in the most happiness for the majority
c) Is based on moral duties and obligations
d) Reflects the intentions of the person performing the action

5. Which of the following best describes a consequentialist ethical theory?

a) The rightness or wrongness of an action depends on its consequences
b) The rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by the person’s intentions
c) Actions are morally right because they align with established laws
d) Ethics are relative and based on cultural norms

6. How does Utilitarianism view the happiness of individuals?

a) Every individual's happiness is equally important
b) Some individuals' happiness is more important than others
c) Happiness is only important if it benefits society as a whole
d) Only the happiness of the majority matters, regardless of the individual

7. Which of the following scenarios would most likely be justified by a Utilitarian

approach?
a) Keeping important information secret to protect an individual’s reputation
b) Laying off employees to increase profits, benefiting shareholders
c) Following strict moral rules even if it causes harm to others
d) Avoiding actions that cause harm to society, even at a personal cost

8. A major criticism of Utilitarianism is that it can sometimes:

a) Lead to decisions that harm minority groups
b) Fail to consider the happiness of the majority
c) Focus too much on individual happiness
d) Make decisions based solely on intent rather than outcomes

9. According to Utilitarianism, a decision should be made by:

a) Following moral rules regardless of the outcome
b) Maximizing the happiness or well-being of the greatest number of people
c) Fulfilling one's moral duties, even at the expense of others
d) Considering only personal happiness

10. Which of the following is a possible Utilitarian approach to resolving an ethical

dilemma in accounting?
a) Withholding financial information to protect the company’s image
b) Disclosing financial information that benefits shareholders but harms employees
c) Ensuring all stakeholders' interests are equally protected, regardless of the
financial impact
d) Prioritizing the short-term profits of the company over the long-term consequences

MRTA, 2025
17
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

2.1.2. Deontology (Duty Ethics)

Deontological ethics, rooted in the idea of duty and moral obligation, focuses
on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions, irrespective of their consequences.
In accounting, this ethical theory emphasizes that professionals should follow
established rules, regulations, and ethical standards regardless of the outcomes. This
is particularly significant in fields like accounting, where integrity, transparency, and
adherence to regulatory frameworks like GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles) and IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) are crucial.

Deontological ethics in accounting dictates that an accountant's duty to uphold

truth and accuracy should never be compromised for short-term gain or to avoid
negative consequences. This requires accountants to navigate various ethical
dilemmas with a strict adherence to ethical principles.

Case Study Analysis:

Analyze real-world accounting dilemmas where deontological ethics must be
applied. The aim is to assess how accountants should act based on their duty to follow
ethical standards rather than being swayed by potential consequences.

Case 1: Financial Statement Manipulation

An accountant at a large corporation is asked by senior management to
overstate the company’s revenue to secure a major investment deal. This action would
significantly inflate the company’s valuation and make the business more attractive to
potential investors. However, this manipulation would violate GAAP guidelines and
result in an inaccurate representation of the company’s financial health.

Requirement: Analyze the situation from a deontological perspective. Should the

accountant comply with the management’s request? Why or why not? What are the
moral duties involved?

Case 2: Underreporting Liabilities

A publicly traded company is facing a tough financial year. The CFO instructs
the company’s accountants to underreport certain liabilities in the financial statements
to avoid a negative reaction from investors and maintain the stock price. This would
provide short-term financial relief but would violate IFRS standards, which require full
disclosure of liabilities.

Requirement: Consider the ethical duties involved in this case. How should the
accountant handle the situation from a deontological perspective? What
consequences could arise from adhering to or violating the accounting standards?

MRTA, 2025
18
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Case 3: Ethical Whistleblowing

An accountant working for a mid-sized company discovers that several of her
colleagues are systematically inflating expenses and falsifying invoices to reduce the
company’s taxable income. The company has a strong culture of protecting
employees, and reporting the issue could jeopardize her job. However, failing to report
the malpractice would violate both the law and ethical standards, and could harm
shareholders and customers.

Requirement: From a deontological standpoint, what is the accountant's duty in this

situation? Should she report the unethical behavior, even if it puts her job at risk? Why
is it important to adhere to ethical principles in this case?

Rubric for Grading the Case Study Analysis

Needs Improvement
Criteria Excellent (90-100%) Good (75-89%) Satisfactory (50-74%)
(Below 50%)
Demonstrates a thorough
understanding of Demonstrates a good Shows a basic Shows a limited or
Understanding of deontological ethics and its understanding of understanding of incorrect understanding
Deontological application in accounting. deontological ethics, but deontological ethics but of deontological ethics
Ethics Clearly explains how duty- may lack some depth in lacks clarity or depth in and fails to effectively
based ethics applies to the applying it to the case. application to the case. apply it to the case.
case.
Accurately identifies all
Identifies most ethical Identifies some ethical Fails to identify relevant
relevant ethical duties and
Identification of duties and explains duties but may not fully ethical duties or
explains them in relation to
Ethical Duties them with reasonable explain them or provide provides incorrect or
the case. Demonstrates clear
clarity. clear reasoning. vague reasoning.
reasoning.
Provides a comprehensive Provides a basic Provides little to no
Analyzes the actions
Analysis of analysis of the actions and analysis, but lacks analysis, or justifies
and their ethical
Actions and their ethical implications, with depth or full justification actions without moral
implications well, with
Consequences clear justification for the moral for the chosen course of reasoning or awareness
adequate justification.
course of action. action. of ethical implications.
Does not apply or
Skillfully applies relevant Correctly applies
Application of Applies accounting incorrectly applies
accounting standards (GAAP relevant accounting
Accounting standards but lacks accounting standards,
or IFRS) and demonstrates standards and explains
Standards clear connection to and fails to connect
how they align with their connection to
(GAAP/IFRS) deontological ethics. them with deontological
deontological ethics. deontological ethics.
ethics.
The analysis is well-
The analysis is well- The analysis lacks The analysis is poorly
organized, clearly written,
Clarity and organized, but may some organization or organized, difficult to
and free of errors. Ideas flow
Organization have a few minor errors has several unclear follow, and contains
logically and are easy to
or unclear sections. sections or errors. numerous errors.
follow.
Demonstrates deep reflection Provides limited
Reflects on the ethical Provides minimal
on the ethical issues and reflection and focuses
issues and considers reflection and lacks
Depth of considers multiple mainly on the
some perspectives, but consideration of the
Reflection perspectives (e.g., duty to the immediate actions
may lack depth in one broader ethical
company, society, rather than broader
area. implications.
stakeholders). ethical concerns.

Grading Scale:
• A (90-100%): Excellent understanding and analysis of deontological ethics applied to
accounting dilemmas. Clear, well-organized, and insightful discussion.
• B (75-89%): Good understanding with adequate application to case studies, but may
lack some depth or clarity.
• C (50-74%): Satisfactory understanding, but lacks critical analysis or clear connection
between deontological ethics and accounting standards.
• D/F (Below 50%): Inadequate understanding or application of deontological ethics in
accounting cases. Lacks clarity and fails to address key ethical principles.

MRTA, 2025
19
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

2.1.3. Virtue Ethics

Introduction

Virtue ethics is a moral theory that places emphasis on the character and
virtues of the moral agent rather than on strict adherence to rules or the outcomes of
actions. Rooted in the philosophy of Aristotle, virtue ethics advocates for individuals to
cultivate good character traits—such as honesty, integrity, and fairness—that guide
ethical decision-making and behavior. Unlike deontological ethics, which focuses on
adherence to duties or rules, or consequentialism, which focuses on the outcomes of
actions, virtue ethics highlights the importance of becoming a good person who will
naturally make the right decisions.
In accounting, virtue ethics encourages professionals to develop and embody
virtues like integrity, honesty, and transparency. These traits are crucial for
accountants, as they help maintain trust, accuracy, and accountability in financial
reporting. A virtuous accountant would strive to act in ways that reflect these qualities,
such as ensuring financial statements are accurate, being transparent in reporting,
and being accountable for their decisions, regardless of external pressures or
consequences.
The principle of virtue ethical decisions are based on what a virtuous person
would do, emphasizing moral character and virtues. Accountants should focus on
developing personal integrity, honesty, and accountability in their work.
Example, an accountant, guided by virtues like honesty and courage, reporting
a fraudulent practice even if it means going against the company leadership.

Case Study Analysis:

Case 1: Financial Reporting and Transparency

An accountant at a large company discovers that the financial statements,
which are set to be submitted to stakeholders, contain significant inaccuracies. The
CFO pressures the accountant to overlook these discrepancies to avoid a potential
negative impact on the company’s stock price. The accountant, however, is aware that
reporting inaccurate financials could mislead stakeholders, investors, and other users
of the financial information.

Requirement: Analyze how virtue ethics applies to this situation. Should the
accountant prioritize the company’s interests, or should they act in a way that reflects
virtues like honesty and integrity? What virtues should the accountant cultivate to
guide their decision-making in this situation?

MRTA, 2025
20
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Case 2: Whistleblowing on Unethical Practices

An accountant at a mid-sized firm uncovers evidence of systematic falsification
of financial records, such as inflating revenue and understating liabilities, intended to
make the company’s financial performance appear stronger than it actually is. The
accountant is faced with a difficult decision: reporting the malpractice could result in
retaliation or even job loss, but remaining silent would allow unethical behavior to
continue.

Requirement: From the perspective of virtue ethics, how should the accountant
approach this dilemma? What virtues should they rely on to make the ethical
decision? Consider how virtues such as courage, honesty, and accountability play a
role in this scenario.

Case 3: Conflicts of Interest

An accountant is asked to review the financials of a client who also happens to
be a close personal friend. The accountant discovers some irregularities that suggest
the client may be engaging in financial practices that violate ethical standards, but the
accountant is conflicted because revealing these issues could harm the client’s
reputation.

Requirement: Analyze how the accountant can act with virtues such as fairness,
integrity, and objectivity. Should they prioritize their duty to report the unethical
behavior, or should they protect their personal relationship? Discuss the importance
of virtue ethics in navigating this situation and how virtues guide the accountant’s
choices.

Rubric for Grading the Case Study Analysis

Needs Improvement
Criteria Excellent (90-100%) Good (75-89%) Satisfactory (50-74%)
(Below 50%)
Demonstrates a deep Demonstrates a good Shows a basic
Limited or incorrect
understanding of virtue understanding of virtue understanding of virtue
Understanding understanding of virtue
ethics, clearly explaining its ethics, but may not fully ethics but lacks clarity
of Virtue Ethics ethics with insufficient
principles and how they explore its application in applying it to the
application to the case.
apply to the case. to the case. case.
Identifies and thoroughly
Identifies some virtues
explains all relevant virtues Identifies most relevant
but does not fully Fails to identify relevant
Identification of (e.g., honesty, integrity, virtues and explains
explain how they relate virtues or makes incorrect
Virtues fairness) and how they them well in the context
to the ethical decision- connections to the case.
should guide the of the case.
making process.
accountant’s decisions.
Provides a well-reasoned, Provides a clear
Provides an analysis
thoughtful analysis of the analysis with some
but lacks depth or clear Analysis is unclear,
Analysis of ethical decision the reasoning, but may lack
connections between underdeveloped, or not
Ethical Decision accountant should make, depth or detailed
the virtues and the linked to virtue ethics.
supported by clear connection to virtue
ethical decision.
references to virtue ethics. ethics.
Skillfully applies relevant
Applies accounting Applies some
accounting standards and Incorrect application or no
Application of standards correctly but accounting practices
practices while reflecting clear connection between
Accounting may not fully reflect but may overlook key
virtuous behavior, ensuring accounting practices and
Practices virtuous behavior in ethical or professional
accuracy and virtues.
their analysis. standards.
accountability.
Well-organized, clearly
Organization could be
written, with logical flow Well-organized but may Poor organization and
Clarity and improved, with several
and no errors. Ideas are have minor errors or unclear writing with
Organization unclear sections or
easy to follow and well- unclear sections. numerous errors.
errors.
supported by examples.

MRTA, 2025
21
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Needs Improvement
Criteria Excellent (90-100%) Good (75-89%) Satisfactory (50-74%)
(Below 50%)
Demonstrates deep Provides limited
Reflects on the ethical Provides minimal
reflection on the ethical reflection, focusing only
issues and considers reflection, focusing only on
Depth of issues, considering multiple on the immediate
some perspectives, but surface-level details
Reflection perspectives and the decision without
may lack depth in one without considering the
broader implications of the broader ethical
area. broader ethical concerns.
decision. implications.

Grading Scale:
• A (90-100%): Excellent understanding and application of virtue ethics. Clear,
insightful analysis that addresses all key virtues and their role in ethical decision-
making.
• B (75-89%): Good understanding with adequate application to case studies, but
lacking some depth or clarity in the analysis.
• C (50-74%): Satisfactory understanding, but lacks critical analysis or clear connection
between virtue ethics and the ethical decisions made.
• D/F (Below 50%): Inadequate understanding or application of virtue ethics in the
case studies. Lacks clarity and fails to address key ethical principles.

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions.
1. What is the central focus of virtue ethics?
a) Following moral rules or duties
b) Achieving the greatest good for the greatest number
c) Developing good character traits and virtues
d) Assessing the outcomes of actions

2. According to Aristotle, what is the goal of human life?

a) To acquire wealth
b) To cultivate virtues and achieve eudaimonia (flourishing)
c) To follow laws and regulations strictly
d) To gain the approval of society

3. Which of the following is an example of a virtue emphasized in virtue ethics?

a) Deception
b) Self-interest
c) Honesty
d) Selfishness

4. In virtue ethics, how should an individual decide what is right in a particular

situation?
a) By calculating the consequences
b) By following a strict set of rules
c) By considering what a virtuous person would do
d) By focusing on personal gain

MRTA, 2025
22
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

5. Which of the following is NOT a characteristic

of a virtuous person according to virtue ethics?
a) Acting with integrity
b) Seeking personal pleasure at the expense of others
c) Acting with fairness
d) Acting with courage

6. Virtue ethics emphasizes which of the following?

a) The importance of following established laws
b) The cultivation of moral virtues to guide ethical decision-making
c) The consequences of one’s actions
d) The avoidance of harm at all costs

7. Which of the following is a virtue in Aristotle’s list of moral virtues?

a) Greed
b) Courage
c) Arrogance
d) Laziness

8. In virtue ethics, which of the following would be considered a deficiency in virtue?

a) Acting with honesty
b) Being excessively proud or arrogant
c) Demonstrating fairness
d) Showing empathy

9. What does "eudaimonia" mean in virtue ethics?

a) The avoidance of pain
b) A life of moral virtue leading to human flourishing and fulfillment
c) The pursuit of wealth and power
d) The application of strict rules to determine morality

10. According to virtue ethics, how does one develop virtuous character traits?
a) By strictly adhering to rules and regulations
b) By focusing solely on personal outcomes
c) By practicing virtues and developing good habits over time
d) By analyzing the consequences of each action before acting

MRTA, 2025
23
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

2.3. Applying Ethical Decision-Making Models in Accounting

Introduction

In real-world scenarios, ethical decision-making models are invaluable tools for

professionals, particularly in fields like accounting, where integrity, transparency, and
adherence to ethical standards are crucial. These models provide structured
approaches to analyze ethical dilemmas and ensure that decisions align with both
legal and moral principles. By following a systematic process, accountants can make
decisions that uphold their professional responsibilities and avoid unethical actions
that may harm stakeholders, the organization, or their own integrity.
One of the key benefits of ethical decision-making models is that they
encourage individuals to consider various perspectives and ethical theories before
acting. These models guide professionals in recognizing the complexity of ethical
dilemmas and enable them to make well-informed, thoughtful decisions.

Steps in Applying Ethical Decision-Making Models

1. Identify the Ethical Issue
The first step in any ethical decision-making process is to clearly identify
the ethical issue at hand. Accountants often encounter situations where they
must decide between right and wrong, such as when faced with pressure to
falsify financial reports, misrepresent data, or conceal discrepancies.
Recognizing the ethical dilemma is essential, as it sets the stage for addressing
the issue with the right tools and frameworks.
Example: A company may face a situation where senior management pressures an
accountant to manipulate the numbers in order to present a more favorable financial
position to shareholders.

2. Gather Information
Once the ethical issue is identified, the next step is to gather all relevant
facts and understand the full context of the dilemma. This involves collecting
information about the facts of the case, understanding the underlying causes,
and considering any legal or professional requirements, such as accounting
standards (GAAP, IFRS) and organizational policies.

Example: In the case of financial report manipulation, the accountant would need to
assess the validity of the financial data, check compliance with relevant accounting
standards, and gather any communications or documents related to the request to
falsify records.

MRTA, 2025
24
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

3. Consider Ethical Standards

The third step is to apply relevant ethical theories and standards to assess
the situation. Ethical decision-making models often encourage consideration of
multiple ethical perspectives, such as:
o Utilitarianism: Focuses on the greatest good for the greatest number.
Accountants may consider how their actions impact various
stakeholders (e.g., employees, investors, clients).
o Deontology: Emphasizes adherence to rules and duties, regardless of
the consequences. For accountants, this could mean following
professional standards and ethical codes, even if it results in short-term
losses for the company.
o Virtue Ethics: Focuses on the character of the decision-maker.
Accountants guided by virtue ethics would prioritize honesty, integrity,
and transparency, acting in ways that reflect these virtues.

Example: The accountant might evaluate whether falsifying the report maximizes the
benefits for shareholders (utilitarianism), whether it violates professional ethical codes
(deontology), and whether it aligns with the virtues of honesty and integrity (virtue
ethics).

4. Evaluate Alternatives
Once ethical standards are considered, the next step is to evaluate the
different alternatives available. This can be done by applying established ethical
decision-making models, such as:
o Rest’s Model of Moral Behavior: This model involves four key
components: moral sensitivity (recognizing the moral issue), moral
judgment (making a decision), moral motivation (prioritizing ethical
values), and moral character (having the willpower to act ethically).
o Thorne’s Integrated Ethical Decision-Making Process: This model
involves recognizing ethical issues, gathering information, generating
alternatives, making a decision, and reflecting on the decision. It
emphasizes a comprehensive approach to ensuring decisions are
ethical and aligned with professional standards.

By using these models, accountants can weigh the potential outcomes of each
alternative and assess the ethical consequences of their decisions.

Example: In our case, the alternatives might include complying with the request to
manipulate the report, refusing to comply and reporting the issue to relevant
authorities, or finding an alternative way to meet the financial goals without falsifying
data.

5. Make a Decision
After considering all alternatives, the next step is to make a decision. This
should be based on a thorough analysis of the facts, ethical considerations, and
the potential impact on stakeholders. The decision should align with the
accountant’s professional duties, ethical standards, and personal integrity.

Example: The accountant decides to refuse to manipulate the financial report, citing
both legal and ethical obligations to report accurate and truthful information.

MRTA, 2025
25
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

6. Reflect on Outcomes
Finally, after implementing the decision, it is important to reflect on the
outcomes. This involves assessing the impact of the decision on the
stakeholders involved and evaluating how well the decision aligns with the
accountant’s personal and professional values. Reflection helps the decision-
maker learn from the experience and refine their ethical decision-making
process in future situations.

Example: After refusing to comply with the falsification request, the accountant
reflects on the consequences—perhaps facing resistance or even job loss—but
ultimately feels confident that they made the right decision, upholding their integrity
and adhering to ethical standards.

Conclusion

Applying ethical decision-making models is essential in ensuring that

accountants navigate complex ethical dilemmas with a structured and thoughtful
approach. By systematically identifying ethical issues, gathering relevant information,
considering ethical standards, evaluating alternatives, making a decision, and
reflecting on outcomes, accountants can ensure that their actions align with
professional ethics and personal integrity. Models like Rest’s Model of Moral Behavior
and Thorne’s Integrated Ethical Decision-Making Process provide valuable
frameworks for making ethical decisions in the workplace, ultimately promoting
accountability, transparency, and trust in the accounting profession.

Key Takeaways:
• Ethical decision-making models provide a structured approach to addressing
ethical dilemmas in accounting.
• Applying multiple ethical perspectives, such as utilitarianism, deontology, and
virtue ethics, helps assess the implications of different actions.
• Reflection on outcomes allows professionals to learn from their decisions and
improve their ethical decision-making skills over time.

MRTA, 2025
26
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

References

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311975.2023.2301138

https://www.heartforkingdom.com/2024/05/05/deontology-utilitarianism-and-virtues-

ethics/

https://www.cpajournal.com/2019/10/14/a-new-approach-to-teaching-ethical-

decision-making-to-accounting-students/

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/

https://grdspublishing.org/index.php/people/article/view/235

https://study.com/academy/lesson/ethical-theories-in-business-applications-

differences.html

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378034908_Ethical_decision-

making_dynamics_insights_from_professional_accountants

MRTA, 2025
27
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT III: ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT IN ACCOUNTING

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Understand and explain the professional conduct expected of accountants in
the Philippines, including adherence to local and international codes of ethics.
2. Describe the role and functions of key regulatory bodies in accounting, such as
the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), IMA (Institute
of Management Accountants), and local Philippine regulatory bodies like the
Board of Accountancy (BOA), Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) and
Philippine Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA).
3. Analyze the Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants and
evaluate its impact on ethical decision-making and professional behavior in
accounting.
4. Apply knowledge of professional conduct and ethical standards in resolving
ethical dilemmas and in ensuring compliance with the regulatory framework
governing the accounting profession in the Philippines.

Introduction

Understanding the professional conduct expected of accountants is vital for

maintaining the integrity and credibility of the accounting profession. Accountants are
entrusted with ensuring the accuracy and transparency of financial information, which
directly impacts the financial well-being of businesses, governments, and individuals.
Ethical behavior is crucial to this responsibility, as it ensures that financial statements
are truthful, reliable, and prepared in accordance with the established laws and
regulations.
In the Philippines, the accounting profession is governed by a robust ethical
framework set by national and international regulatory bodies.
The Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants plays a key role
in outlining the professional conduct expected of accountants. This code ensures that
accountants maintain high standards of ethics, which are essential for fostering public
trust and accountability.
This discussion explores the Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants, the regulatory bodies responsible for enforcing ethical standards, and
how these principles guide accountants in making ethical decisions in their daily
practices.

MRTA, 2025
28
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

The Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants

The Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants is a

comprehensive framework that outlines the ethical principles and standards to which
all certified public accountants (CPAs) in the country must adhere. The Code sets forth
fundamental principles, such as:

1. Integrity: Accountants must be honest and straightforward in all professional

and business relationships. They should avoid any conduct that would discredit
the profession.
2. Objectivity: Accountants should not allow bias, conflict of interest, or undue
influence of others to override their professional or business judgments.
3. Professional Competence: Accountants are required to maintain their
professional knowledge and skill to ensure they can provide competent
services. They must also undertake continuing professional development to
keep up with changes in regulations and standards.
4. Confidentiality: Accountants must respect the confidentiality of information
acquired in the course of their work. They should not disclose any information
without proper authority unless legally required to do so.
5. Professional Behavior: Accountants should comply with all relevant laws and
regulations and avoid any conduct that could discredit the profession.

These principles form the foundation of the ethical conduct expected from
accountants in the Philippines. They guide not only everyday actions but also complex
ethical dilemmas that may arise in the course of an accountant's career.

Regulatory Bodies Overseeing Ethical Conduct

In the Philippines, several key regulatory bodies are responsible for overseeing
the enforcement of ethical standards in the accounting profession. These bodies help
ensure that accountants adhere to the Philippine Code of Ethics and maintain the
profession's integrity.
1. Board of Accountancy (BOA): The BOA is a government agency under the
Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) that is tasked with regulating
the practice of accountancy in the Philippines. It is responsible for setting
standards for licensure exams, overseeing the professional conduct of
accountants, and taking disciplinary action against violators of the ethical code.
2. Professional Regulation Commission (PRC): The PRC is the government
body that oversees all professional licenses in the Philippines, including that of
accountants. It works with the BOA to enforce ethical guidelines and ensure
that accountants meet the required standards of competence and integrity.
3. Philippine Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA): PICPA is a
national organization of accountants that plays a role in maintaining the ethical
standards of the profession. It provides continuing education, resources, and
support to its members and is involved in lobbying for the advancement of the
profession's interests.
4. International Regulatory Bodies: In addition to national bodies, Filipino
accountants also need to adhere to international ethical standards.
Organizations such as the American Institute of Certified Public

MRTA, 2025
29
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Accountants (AICPA) and the Institute of

Management Accountants (IMA) set global ethical guidelines that Filipino
accountants follow, especially those working with international clients or in
multinational organizations.

These regulatory bodies work together to ensure that ethical standards are
consistently upheld, ensuring the credibility of financial reporting and safeguarding
public interest.

Case Analysis: Applying Ethical Principles in Practice

Case 1: Falsifying Financial Reports

An accountant at a large corporation is under pressure from senior
management to adjust the company’s financial statements to reflect better results for
an upcoming investor presentation. The company’s sales projections have fallen short,
and management believes that presenting a better financial outlook will help secure
investor confidence.

Ethical Issue: The accountant is faced with a dilemma: to falsify the financial reports
and satisfy management’s request, or to refuse and risk losing the job. The decision
at hand challenges the accountant’s integrity, objectivity, and professional
behavior.

Analysis Using the Philippine Code of Ethics:

• Integrity: Falsifying the financial reports is a clear violation of integrity. The
accountant must remain truthful and transparent in reporting, regardless of
external pressures.
• Objectivity: The accountant must avoid being swayed by the interests of
management and must instead make decisions based on professional
judgment and not personal or organizational influence.
• Professional Behavior: The accountant has a duty to comply with legal and
professional standards, which prohibit fraudulent financial reporting. The
accountant should act in a way that upholds the public trust and maintains the
integrity of the profession.

Decision: The accountant should refuse to falsify the reports and, if necessary,
escalate the issue to the appropriate authorities, such as the Board of Accountancy or
the company's audit committee, to address the ethical breach.

Case 2: Conflicts of Interest

An accountant is also a board member of a company in which they have a
significant financial interest. They are involved in the financial decision-making
process of the company. The accountant is asked to oversee the auditing of the
company’s financial statements.

Ethical Issue: The accountant faces a conflict of interest between their personal
financial interest and their professional responsibility to ensure that the company’s
financial statements are accurately reported.

MRTA, 2025
30
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Analysis Using the Philippine Code of Ethics:

• Objectivity: The accountant must be objective and should avoid any conflicts
of interest that could impair their professional judgment.
• Professional Competence: The accountant must maintain professional
integrity and ensure that the financial statements are prepared in accordance
with ethical standards, avoiding any biases due to personal interests.

Decision: To maintain objectivity and avoid conflicts of interest, the accountant should
recuse themselves from overseeing the audit process and ensure that an independent
auditor is brought in to avoid any ethical violations.

Conclusion

Adherence to ethical standards is critical in ensuring the continued integrity of

the accounting profession in the Philippines. Accountants must understand the
Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which outlines key
principles such as integrity, objectivity, and professional competence. Additionally, the
role of regulatory bodies like the Board of Accountancy (BOA), the Professional
Regulation Commission (PRC), and the Philippine Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (PICPA) is crucial in enforcing these standards and promoting ethical
behavior in the profession. By applying these ethical guidelines in practice,
accountants can help resolve ethical dilemmas and maintain the trust of stakeholders.

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions

1. What is the primary objective of the Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants?
a) To provide tax advice
b) To establish a framework for ethical behavior in accounting
c) To regulate accounting fees
d) To increase the financial performance of firms

2. Which of the following is NOT a fundamental principle of the Philippine Code of

Ethics for Professional Accountants?
a) Integrity
b) Professional competence
c) Competitiveness
d) Confidentiality

3. The Board of Accountancy (BOA) is responsible for:

a) Setting accounting fees
b) Regulating the practice of accountancy in the Philippines
c) Auditing financial statements
d) Managing the Philippine Stock Exchange

MRTA, 2025
31
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

4. What does the principle of "objectivity" require

from an accountant?
a) To always act in the best interest of their employer
b) To make decisions based on personal opinions
c) To avoid bias, conflict of interest, or undue influence in decision-making
d) To provide financial services to as many clients as possible

5. Which of the following organizations is responsible for the licensure and regulation
of accountants in the Philippines?
a) Philippine Stock Exchange
b) Professional Regulation Commission (PRC)
c) National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA)
d) Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)

6. Confidentiality in the accounting profession means that accountants should:

a) Share all client information with competitors
b) Keep client information private unless legally required to disclose it
c) Only disclose information when it benefits the client
d) Discuss client matters with family members

7. An accountant faced with pressure to falsify financial statements should rely on

which principle to guide their actions?
a) Professional competence
b) Integrity
c) Objectivity
d) Both b and c

8. The Philippine Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA) is responsible for:

a) Setting accounting standards in the Philippines
b) Enforcing legal penalties for tax evasion
c) Providing support and resources to accountants
d) Regulating the stock market

9. Ethical behavior in accounting helps to:

a) Increase the wealth of accountants
b) Maintain the public's trust and credibility of financial reporting
c) Reduce the workload of accountants
d) Minimize government intervention in businesses

10. Which of the following is a possible consequence of an accountant violating

ethical principles?
a) Increased job security
b) Professional and legal disciplinary actions
c) Higher salary
d) Recognition from peers

11. According to the Philippine Code of Ethics, what is required of accountants in

relation to professional competence?
a) Accountants must complete continuing professional education and stay updated
with regulations

MRTA, 2025
32
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

b) Accountants are not required to pursue further

education after obtaining a license
c) Accountants should prioritize personal financial gain over professional growth
d) Accountants can rely on previous knowledge without any need for ongoing
education

12. How does the Philippine Code of Ethics impact the behavior of accountants?
a) It encourages accountants to focus on financial gain
b) It provides a structured framework for ethical decision-making
c) It discourages accountants from reporting discrepancies in financial statements
d) It limits accountants' ability to make independent judgments

13. When an accountant faces a conflict of interest, they should:

a) Disregard the situation to avoid confrontation
b) Make decisions that benefit their personal interests
c) Recuse themselves from the decision-making process
d) Ignore ethical standards

14. What is the primary role of the Board of Accountancy (BOA)?

a) To issue tax regulations
b) To ensure that accountants comply with professional ethics and standards
c) To provide financial services to businesses
d) To create new accounting laws

15. In cases of ethical violations, which organization can impose sanctions or

penalties on accountants in the Philippines?
a) Philippine Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA)
b) Board of Accountancy (BOA)
c) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
d) Department of Finance

16. Which of the following best describes the role of regulatory bodies in the
accounting profession?
a) To enforce ethical standards and ensure public trust
b) To promote financial misconduct
c) To make accounting decisions for businesses
d) To control the accounting industry

17. An accountant should maintain professional behavior by:

a) Avoiding actions that could damage the reputation of the profession
b) Acting solely in the interest of their clients
c) Focusing on maximizing company profits
d) Ignoring ethical dilemmas

18. What is the significance of international ethical standards like those from the
AICPA and IMA?
a) They are optional for Filipino accountants
b) They ensure global uniformity in ethical practices and standards
c) They only apply to accountants in the U.S.
d) They are irrelevant for Filipino accountants

MRTA, 2025
33
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

19. Which of the following actions would violate

an accountant's duty to maintain confidentiality?
a) Sharing client information with the government when required by law
b) Discussing client details with a colleague within the firm, as needed
c) Disclosing client information to a competitor for personal gain
d) Keeping client information secure within the firm

20. The principle of "professional behavior" expects accountants to:

a) Act in a manner that reflects positively on the profession
b) Focus on personal financial gain
c) Engage in conduct that brings personal recognition
d) Ignore industry regulations

Case Study Analysis

Case Study: Falsifying Financial Statements in a Publicly Listed Company

An accountant working for a publicly listed company is approached by senior

management with a request to adjust the financial statements before they are
published. The changes would involve inflating the revenue figures for the quarter,
which would make the company appear more profitable to investors and secure a
higher stock price. The accountant is aware that such a change would violate both the
Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants and local financial reporting
standards.

Ethical Dilemma: The accountant faces a difficult decision: should they comply with
management's request to adjust the financial statements, or should they refuse to
comply and report the issue, potentially risking their job and professional reputation?

Instructions:

1. Identify the Ethical Issue: Recognize the ethical dilemma the accountant is
facing and highlight the specific issues involved.
2. Apply Ethical Principles: Use the fundamental principles outlined in the
Philippine Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (Integrity, Objectivity,
Professional Competence, Confidentiality, and Professional Behavior) to
analyze the situation.
3. Evaluate Alternatives: Suggest possible actions the accountant could take.
Evaluate each alternative using the ethical principles discussed.
4. Make a Decision: Choose the most ethically sound course of action and justify
the decision.
5. Reflect on Outcomes: Discuss the potential outcomes of the decision,
considering both short-term consequences and long-term implications for the
accountant and the company.

MRTA, 2025
34
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Rubric for Grading:

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Vaguely identifies
Clearly identifies the Identifies the Identifies the dilemma Does not clearly
Identification of the dilemma with
ethical dilemma and dilemma and most but overlooks some identify the ethical
Ethical Issue several issues
all issues involved issues involved key issues issue
missing
Thoroughly applies Does not apply
Application of Applies most Applies some Applies few
all relevant ethical ethical principles
Ethical principles with clear principles with limited principles with
principles with or does so
Principles justification justification unclear justification
strong justification inaccurately
Provides a well- Provides a good Provides a weak or
Provides a basic Does not provide
Evaluation of reasoned evaluation evaluation of incomplete
evaluation with an evaluation of
Alternatives of multiple alternatives with evaluation of
minimal analysis alternatives
alternatives some analysis alternatives
Decision is ethically Decision is ethically
Decision is ethically Decision lacks Decision is not
Decision and sound with thorough, sound with
sound but justification ethical justification or ethically sound or
Justification well-supported reasonable
is weak is poorly explained lacks justification
justification justification
Provides a deep Reflects on both Reflects on short-term
Minimal reflection on No reflection on
Reflection on reflection on both short-term and long- outcomes but lacks
outcomes or lacks outcomes
Outcomes short-term and long- term outcomes with depth on long-term
depth in analysis provided
term outcomes some depth outcomes

Grading Scale:
• 25-30 points: Excellent understanding of ethical decision-making and application of
ethical principles
• 20-24 points: Good understanding, but some areas need more depth or clarity
• 15-19 points: Satisfactory understanding with notable gaps or unclear justification
• 10-14 points: Limited understanding of ethical principles or poor analysis
• Below 10 points: Insufficient understanding or lack of application of ethical principles

References

https://www.ethicsboard.org/consultations-projects/revised-code-ethics-completed

https://cmaphilippines.com/cma-philippines/code-of-ethics/

https://www.ali.net.ph/documents/Code-of-Ethics-for-Professional-Accountants.pdf

https://niat.edu.ph/code-of-ethics/

https://www.prc.gov.ph/sites/default/files/AccountancyCOE.pdf

https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/university-of-the-cordilleras/accounting/code-

of-ethics-for-professional-accountants-in-the-philippines/80117331

MRTA, 2025
35
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT IV: ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING MODELS

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Identify and describe various decision-making frameworks that are applicable
to ethical issues in accounting, such as the utilitarian approach, deontological
ethics, and virtue ethics.
2. Apply decision-making frameworks to analyze complex accounting issues and
ethical dilemmas, considering the potential consequences, duties, and
character traits involved.
3. Evaluate the outcomes of different decision-making approaches when applied
to specific accounting situations, such as financial reporting, conflicts of
interest, and fraud detection.
4. Demonstrate the ability to make informed, ethical decisions in accounting
practice by selecting the most appropriate decision-making model based on the
specific ethical challenge at hand.

Introduction

Ethical decision-making is a critical component of the accounting profession.

Accountants are frequently faced with complex dilemmas that require them to evaluate
the situation carefully, consider different perspectives, and make decisions that align
with ethical standards. Several ethical frameworks can guide accountants in
navigating these challenges, including utilitarianism, deontological ethics, and virtue
ethics.
Demonstrating the ability to make informed, ethical decisions in accounting
practice involves selecting the most appropriate decision-making model based on the
specific ethical challenge at hand. By integrating insights from these frameworks,
accountants can navigate ethical dilemmas with confidence, ensuring compliance with
regulatory standards while upholding the integrity of their profession. This structured
approach not only enhances individual decision-making but also contributes to
fostering a culture of ethical accountability within the accounting field.

1. Utilitarian Approach
The utilitarian approach to ethical decision-making is centered on the idea of
maximizing overall happiness or minimizing harm. In the context of accounting, this
approach emphasizes the consequences of a decision, encouraging accountants to
make choices that will result in the greatest benefit for the greatest number of
stakeholders. For example, an accountant may choose to report financial results
truthfully, even if it reflects poorly on the company, because it serves the public interest
and maintains trust in the financial markets.

MRTA, 2025
36
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Key Focus: Consequences and overall well-being

of stakeholders.

Application in Accounting:
• Financial reporting with a focus on transparency and accuracy.
• Making decisions that protect the interests of investors, employees, and the
public.

2. Deontological Ethics (Duty-Based Ethics)

Deontological ethics is rooted in the belief that certain actions are morally
obligatory, regardless of the consequences. According to this approach, accountants
have a duty to uphold ethical principles such as honesty, integrity, and fairness. Even
when a decision may lead to undesirable outcomes, an accountant should make the
ethically right choice based on their duties and professional codes of conduct.

Key Focus: Duties and rules; adherence to ethical principles.

Application in Accounting:
• Ensuring compliance with regulations and laws, such as GAAP (Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles) and IFRS (International Financial Reporting
Standards).
• Refusing to participate in unethical actions like falsifying financial statements,
regardless of potential consequences.

3. Virtue Ethics
Virtue ethics emphasizes the character and moral virtues of the decision-maker.
This framework encourages accountants to develop and embody virtues such as
integrity, honesty, fairness, and courage. An accountant guided by virtue ethics will
prioritize ethical behavior based on their character and strive to act in a way that
reflects these virtues in all professional decisions.

Key Focus: Moral character and virtues of the individual.

Application in Accounting:
• Upholding transparency and accountability in all aspects of accounting practice.
• Making decisions that align with personal and professional values, such as
truthfulness and responsibility.

Case Study Analysis

Case 1: Falsifying Financial Statements

You are an accountant for a mid-sized company that is facing financial
difficulties. The management has asked you to adjust the financial statements to show
higher revenue than what was actually earned to make the company appear more
financially stable. This would help secure an investment that the company urgently
needs. You are aware that this action would violate accounting standards and could
potentially harm investors, but it might benefit the company in the short term.

MRTA, 2025
37
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Questions:
• Which ethical framework would you apply to analyze this situation?
• What would be the ethical course of action?
• How would each framework (utilitarianism, deontological ethics, and virtue
ethics) influence your decision?

Case 2: Conflict of Interest in Auditing

You are auditing a client’s financial statements, and during your review, you
notice discrepancies in the numbers reported in the client's inventory. However, you
also realize that the client is a close personal friend and has been supportive of your
career. There is pressure to overlook the discrepancies to maintain the relationship
and keep your job. You must decide whether to report the discrepancy or overlook it.

Questions:
• How would you approach this situation using utilitarianism, deontological ethics,
and virtue ethics?
• What would be the consequences of each decision?
• How should you balance your duties and professional behavior?

Rubric for Grading the Case Study Activity

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Identifies some Fails to identify key
Identification Clearly identifies all ethical Identifies most Does not
ethical issues but ethical issues or
of Ethical issues and fully ethical issues with identify any
lacks full misses important
Issues understands the dilemma good understanding ethical issues
understanding aspects
Thoroughly applies all
Application of three ethical frameworks Applies two ethical Applies one Applies one Does not apply
Ethical (utilitarianism, deontology, frameworks with framework with framework poorly or ethical
Frameworks virtue ethics) with strong clear justification limited justification without justification frameworks
justification for each one
Provides a well-reasoned, Provides a good Provides weak Does not
Provides basic
Evaluation of balanced evaluation of evaluation of evaluation with little provide any
evaluation but lacks
Alternatives alternatives considering alternatives with consideration of evaluation of
depth or clarity
all stakeholders some depth stakeholders alternatives
Clear, well-supported Good decision with Decision is ethically
Decision lacks Decision is not
Decision and decision with strong clear justification, sound but weakly
clarity or ethical or
Justification ethical reasoning using but lacks depth in justified or
justification poorly justified
frameworks some areas incomplete
Deep reflection on short- Reflects on both Reflects mainly on Minimal or
No reflection on
Reflection on term and long-term short-term and long- short-term outcomes incomplete
outcomes
Outcomes outcomes, considering all term outcomes with but lacks depth on reflection on
provided
stakeholders some depth long-term impact outcomes

Grading Scale:
• 25-30 points: Excellent application of ethical frameworks, deep analysis, and clear
decision-making.
• 20-24 points: Good application, but some areas need more depth or clarity in
evaluation or justification.
• 15-19 points: Satisfactory understanding with gaps in analysis or weak justification.
• 10-14 points: Limited understanding of the frameworks or weak application of ethical
reasoning.
• Below 10 points: Insufficient understanding, lack of analysis, or ethically questionable
decisions.

MRTA, 2025
38
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

References

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/srj-11-2017-0240/full/html

https://library.fiveable.me/ethics-in-accounting/unit-2/decision-making-models-

approaches/study-guide/fq8NWI3fJ9QEadOK

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311975.2023.2301138

https://www.cpajournal.com/2019/10/14/a-new-approach-to-teaching-ethical-

decision-making-to-accounting-students/

https://www.accaglobal.com/gb/en/student/exam-support-resources/professional-

exams-study-resources/strategic-business-leader/technical-articles/ethical-decision-

making.html

MRTA, 2025
39
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT V: CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN ACCOUNTING

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Define and identify conflicts of interest in the accounting profession,
specifically in the context of financial reporting.
2. Analyze real-world case studies involving conflicts of interest, discussing the
ethical challenges and the consequences of failing to address them.
3. Evaluate the impact of conflicts of interest on the integrity of financial reporting
and the trust placed in financial statements by stakeholders.
4. Propose ethical solutions to resolve conflicts of interest in accounting
scenarios, ensuring compliance with professional standards and ethical
conduct.

Introduction

Conflicts of interest (COI) are a critical concern in the accounting profession,

especially in financial reporting. A conflict of interest arises when an individual’s
personal interests or relationships interfere with their ability to act impartially and in the
best interests of their clients, employers, or the public. In the context of accounting,
conflicts of interest can significantly undermine the integrity of financial reporting and
damage trust in the financial statements produced.

5.1. Understanding Conflicts of Interest in Accounting

A conflict of interest in accounting occurs when an accountant’s judgment or
actions are influenced by personal interests, relationships, or financial incentives that
conflict with their professional obligations. In financial reporting, this might involve
situations where an accountant is asked to manipulate or distort financial data to
benefit a particular party.

Example Conflict of Interest:

An accountant working for a publicly listed company may have a personal
financial stake in the company’s stock. If the company is underperforming and needs
to meet certain financial targets to improve its stock price, the accountant may feel
compelled to alter the financial statements to reflect a more favorable outcome,
thereby benefiting from the increased stock price.

5.2. Ethical Challenges of Conflicts of Interest

When conflicts of interest arise, accountants face significant ethical challenges.
These challenges include:

• Integrity and Objectivity: Accountants are expected to act with integrity and
maintain objectivity. Conflicts of interest create pressures that can erode these
values, leading to decisions that are not in the public interest.

MRTA, 2025
40
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

• Accountability: Accountants must hold

themselves accountable for their actions. A conflict of interest can create
situations where accountants make decisions that benefit them personally but
harm stakeholders such as investors, creditors, and the public.
• Transparency: Financial statements must be transparent and accurate.
Conflicts of interest can lead to fraudulent or misleading reporting, ultimately
damaging the reputation of the profession and the trust of stakeholders.

5.3. Consequences of Failing to Address Conflicts of Interest

Failing to address conflicts of interest can have serious consequences:
• Damage to Reputation: The credibility of the accounting profession is directly
tied to the integrity of financial reporting. Conflicts of interest undermine this
integrity and can lead to the loss of public trust.
• Legal and Regulatory Penalties: Violating professional ethical standards or
laws governing financial reporting can result in legal consequences, including
fines, lawsuits, or revocation of licenses.
• Loss of Stakeholder Confidence: Investors, creditors, and other stakeholders
rely on accurate financial reports to make informed decisions. Conflicts of
interest can distort these reports, leading to financial losses and a breakdown
of stakeholder trust.

5.4. Proposing Ethical Solutions

Addressing conflicts of interest involves:
• Disclosure: Accountants should disclose any potential or actual conflicts of
interest to their clients, employers, or regulatory bodies.
• Independent Oversight: Financial reporting should be subject to independent
audits to ensure the accuracy and fairness of financial statements.
• Ethical Decision-Making Models: Accountants can use ethical decision-
making frameworks, such as utilitarianism, deontological ethics, or virtue ethics,
to guide their actions and resolve conflicts.
• Separation of Duties: In cases where conflicts of interest are inevitable,
separating the accountant's duties and responsibilities can reduce the
likelihood of undue influence affecting financial reporting.

Case Study Analysis

Case 1: Conflict of Interest in Financial Reporting

An accountant, Emily, works for a publicly traded company that has recently
faced a decline in stock prices due to a series of poor financial results. As part of her
role, she is tasked with preparing the company's quarterly financial report. The CEO,
who is a close personal friend of Emily, pressures her to adjust the numbers to make
the company’s financial position appear stronger than it actually is. Emily owns a
significant amount of stock in the company, which would increase in value if the
financial results look more favorable.

Questions:
1. What are the potential conflicts of interest in this scenario?
2. How should Emily handle this situation according to ethical guidelines in
accounting?

MRTA, 2025
41
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

3. What are the potential consequences if

Emily gives in to the CEO's pressure and alters the financial statements?

Case 2: Conflict of Interest in Auditing

An auditor, John, is hired to conduct an audit of a company’s financial
statements. The company is a long-term client, and John has developed a close
relationship with the CEO over the years. During the audit, John notices significant
discrepancies in the reported revenue figures. However, he feels that raising these
issues could jeopardize the business relationship and his future earnings from the
company. The CEO hints that John’s contract renewal may depend on the outcome of
the audit.

Questions:
1. What are the ethical challenges John faces in this scenario?
2. What steps should John take to resolve the conflict of interest?
3. What would be the impact of John failing to address the discrepancies in the
audit?

Rubric for Grading Case Study Activity

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Clearly identifies all Identifies most
Identifies some Fails to identify key Does not identify
Identification of conflicts of interest conflicts of interest
conflicts of interest but conflicts or misses any conflicts of
Conflicts and fully understands with good
lacks full understanding important aspects interest
the dilemma understanding
Provides a well-
Provides a good Provides a weak
reasoned, Provides a basic Does not
Ethical Solution solution, but lacks solution with little
comprehensive ethical solution with limited propose an
Proposal depth in some consideration of
solution to resolve the justification ethical solution
areas ethical standards
conflict
Deep analysis of
Analyzes both
potential short-term Analyzes mainly short- Minimal or
short-term and No analysis of
Analysis of and long-term term consequences but incomplete
long-term consequences
Consequences consequences, lacks depth on long- analysis of
consequences with provided
considering all term impact consequences
some depth
stakeholders
Argument is clearly
Argument is clear Argument is somewhat Argument lacks Argument is
Clarity of structured and well-
but lacks depth in unclear or clarity or is poorly confusing or
Argument supported with ethical
some sections underdeveloped structured poorly explained
principles
Deep application of Good application of Basic application with Minimal application
Application of No application of
ethical principles and ethical principles, some or incorrect
Ethical ethical principles
guidelines in the but some parts lack misunderstanding of application of
Standards provided
resolution depth ethical guidelines ethical principles

Grading Scale:

• 25-30 points: Excellent understanding and application of conflict of interest

principles, with a deep analysis of ethical solutions and consequences.
• 20-24 points: Good analysis and ethical solution, but some areas need more depth
or clarity.
• 15-19 points: Satisfactory understanding with gaps in analysis or weak justification.
• 10-14 points: Limited understanding of conflicts of interest and ethical solutions or
weak application of principles.
• Below 10 points: Insufficient understanding, lack of analysis, or ethically
questionable decisions.

MRTA, 2025
42
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions.

1. Which of the following is an example of a conflict of interest in accounting?

a) An accountant working for a company that is publicly listed
b) An accountant having a financial interest in the company they are auditing
c) An accountant preparing financial reports for clients
d) An accountant following Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. What is the primary ethical issue involved when an accountant alters financial
statements to improve a company's performance?
a) Professional competence
b) Integrity
c) Transparency
d) Objectivity
3. Which of the following best describes a situation where an accountant’s personal
interests might affect their professional judgment?
a) Professional independence
b) Conflict of interest
c) Ethical dilemma
d) Professional skepticism
4. If an accountant faces pressure to alter financial statements, they should primarily
rely on which of the following principles?
a) Professional competence
b) Objectivity
c) Confidentiality
d) Professional behavior
5. Which regulatory body is responsible for enforcing ethical standards in accounting
in the Philippines?
a) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
b) Philippine Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA)
c) Board of Accountancy (BOA)
d) Department of Finance (DOF)
6. Which of the following is a potential consequence of not addressing conflicts of
interest in financial reporting?
a) Increased company profits
b) Loss of public trust and credibility
c) Enhanced job security for accountants
d) Improved relationships with clients
7. Which ethical principle is most relevant when an accountant is pressured to
overlook a conflict of interest?
a) Integrity
b) Transparency
c) Accountability
d) Objectivity
8. What is a key reason why auditors should avoid conflicts of interest?
a) To maximize profits for the company
b) To ensure they can maintain their business relationships

MRTA, 2025
43
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

c) To provide accurate and unbiased financial

reports
d) To reduce the time spent on audits
9. In the context of financial reporting, what does "objectivity" mean for an
accountant?
a) Adhering to personal relationships and biases
b) Making decisions based solely on financial incentives
c) Providing unbiased and independent judgment
d) Following client demands to maintain business
10. Which ethical solution can an accountant apply to resolve a conflict of interest in
financial reporting?
a) Disclose the conflict to relevant stakeholders
b) Ignore the conflict if the financial results benefit the company
c) Alter the report to satisfy management’s demands
d) Withhold the information from the public

References

https://accountancyrecruit.co.uk/blog/industry-insights-surveys/navigating-conflicts-

of-interest-and-transparency-in-accounting/

https://repository.essex.ac.uk/25258/1/Managing%20CoIResearch%20Synthesis%2

0(UoE%20Repository).pdf

https://sssjournal.com/files/sssjournal/f8169ee0-4baa-41e9-9c5c-b9d2fce0dae2.pdf

https://philarchive.org/archive/DILTEI

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375516693_Conflicts_of_Interest_in_Acco

unting_Implications_and_Solutions

https://www.acuitymag.com/opinion/how-accountants-manage-conflicts-of-interest

https://fiveable.me/ethics-in-accounting/unit-7

MRTA, 2025
44
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT VI: ETHICS AND FINANCIAL REPORTING

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Understand the importance of ethics in financial reporting, emphasizing
transparency and the role of accountants in safeguarding the truthfulness of
financial statements.
2. Explain the consequences of unethical behavior in financial reporting, such as
fraudulent financial statements, misrepresentation, and the resulting loss of
public trust.
3. Identify the responsibilities of accountants in ensuring the accuracy, honesty,
and reliability of financial reporting, adhering to ethical standards and
accounting principles.
4. Apply ethical principles to evaluate financial reporting scenarios, ensuring
transparency and maintaining public trust

Introduction

Financial reporting is a cornerstone of the accounting profession, and its

accuracy and transparency are critical to maintaining public trust in financial markets.

Accountants play an essential role in ensuring that financial statements reflect the true

financial position of a company, allowing stakeholders—such as investors, regulators,

and the public—to make informed decisions.

6.1. The Importance of Ethics in Financial Reporting

Ethics in financial reporting ensures that financial statements are not misleading
and that all transactions are accurately represented. Transparent reporting requires
honesty, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to ethical standards, particularly
the adherence to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

Key Ethical Principles in Financial Reporting:

• Honesty: Financial statements must present a true and fair view of a
company’s financial position, without embellishment or omission.
• Integrity: Accountants must act with integrity by ensuring that no false
information is presented, and any misrepresentation is corrected.
• Transparency: Financial data should be presented in a clear and
understandable manner to provide stakeholders with an accurate
understanding of the company’s financial health.

Role of Accountants: Accountants are responsible for safeguarding the truthfulness

of financial statements. They ensure that financial data is accurately recorded and
reported, which in turn fosters trust in the financial system. When accountants follow

MRTA, 2025
45
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

ethical guidelines, they uphold the credibility of

financial reporting, contributing to a fair, transparent, and accountable economic
environment.

6.2. Consequences of Unethical Behavior in Financial Reporting

Unethical behavior in financial reporting can have severe consequences for
companies, accountants, and the broader economy. Common examples of unethical
behavior include fraudulent financial statements, misrepresentation of financial data,
and deliberate omissions of critical information.

Consequences of Unethical Financial Reporting:

• Loss of Public Trust: When companies or accountants engage in unethical
practices, it erodes public trust in the accuracy of financial information. This can
harm the reputation of the accounting profession and the financial markets as
a whole.
• Legal and Regulatory Penalties: Fraudulent activities, such as the falsification
of financial statements, can lead to significant legal consequences, including
lawsuits, fines, and potential imprisonment. Regulatory bodies such as the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have strict rules for financial
reporting and take legal action against violations.
• Financial Losses: Investors and stakeholders who rely on financial reports to
make informed decisions can suffer significant financial losses if the reports are
inaccurate or misleading.
• Company Reputation Damage: Unethical behavior can cause lasting damage
to a company’s reputation, making it difficult for the business to regain investor
confidence or secure future funding.

6.3. Responsibilities of Accountants in Financial Reporting

Accountants are bound by professional ethical standards and are responsible for
ensuring the accuracy, reliability, and honesty of financial reports. Their duties include:
• Adherence to Accounting Standards: Accountants must ensure that financial
reports are in line with established accounting principles such as GAAP or
IFRS.
• Objectivity and Independence: Accountants must remain objective and
independent, especially when auditing financial statements. They should not let
personal interests or relationships affect their professional judgment.
• Accountability: Accountants are responsible for reporting any discrepancies
or inaccuracies in financial statements and ensuring that corrective actions are
taken when necessary.
• Confidentiality: Accountants must maintain confidentiality about client
information unless required by law to disclose it.

6.4. Applying Ethical Principles to Financial Reporting Scenarios

Ethical principles must be applied consistently to evaluate financial reporting
scenarios. This ensures that accountants maintain the integrity of financial statements
and preserve stakeholder trust. Let's consider a case study where ethical decision-
making is crucial.

MRTA, 2025
46
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Conclusion

In conclusion, ethics in financial reporting is crucial for fostering transparency,

maintaining public trust, and ensuring compliance with professional standards. The
consequences of unethical behavior can be dire, leading to fraudulent practices that
undermine stakeholder confidence. Accountants have a fundamental responsibility to
uphold ethical principles in their work, ensuring that financial statements are accurate
and reliable. By applying these ethical standards diligently, accountants can navigate
challenges effectively and contribute positively to the integrity of the accounting
profession

Case Study Analysis

Case 1: Ethical Dilemma in Financial Reporting

Jane, an accountant at a publicly traded company, has just completed the
quarterly financial report. During her review, she notices a discrepancy between the
reported revenue and the actual revenue figures. The company has been
underperforming, and management is under pressure to meet its earnings projections.
The CEO, who is also a close family friend, asks Jane to "adjust" the revenue figures
to reflect the targeted earnings in order to secure investor confidence.
Jane faces an ethical dilemma: should she comply with the CEO’s request to alter the
financial report, or should she report the discrepancies as they are, even if it means
disappointing the CEO and potentially harming the company’s stock price?

Questions for Discussion:

1. What are the ethical issues involved in this situation?
2. What are the potential consequences of altering the financial report, both short-
term and long-term?
3. How should Jane apply ethical principles such as integrity, objectivity, and
transparency in making her decision?
4. What would be the impact on the public and stakeholders if Jane chooses to
falsify the financial statements?
5. How should Jane communicate her decision to the CEO and the board,
considering the potential professional and personal ramifications?

Rubric for Grading Case Study Activity

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Clearly identifies all Identifies some Fails to identify key
Identifies most Does not identify
Identification of ethical issues and fully ethical issues but ethical issues or
ethical issues with any ethical
Ethical Issues understands the lacks full misses important
good understanding issues
dilemma understanding aspects
Demonstrates a deep
Applies ethical
understanding of ethical Applies ethical
Application of principles but with Provides minimal
principles (integrity, principles with some Does not apply
Ethical limited application of
objectivity, depth and ethical principles
Principles understanding or ethical principles
transparency) and justification
justification
applies them to the case
Provides a detailed and Analyzes
thoughtful analysis of consequences with Basic analysis of
Analysis of Minimal analysis of Does not analyze
both short-term and some depth but consequences with
Consequences consequences consequences
long-term lacks full limited depth
consequences consideration

MRTA, 2025
47
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Provides a good
Clear, well-supported
decision with Decision is ethically Decision lacks Decision is not
Decision and decision with strong
justification, but sound but weakly clarity or ethical or poorly
Justification ethical reasoning and
lacks depth in some justified justification justified
justification
areas
Clearly and effectively
Basic Fails to
communicates the Communicates the Minimal or unclear
Communication communication of communicate the
decision, considering decision well, but communication of
of Decision decision, but not decision
professional and lacks depth or clarity decision
well developed effectively
personal impacts

Grading Scale:
• 25-30 points: Excellent understanding and application of ethical principles with a
thorough analysis of the case.
• 20-24 points: Good application and ethical decision-making, but some areas need
more depth or clarity.
• 15-19 points: Satisfactory understanding with gaps in analysis or weak justification.
• 10-14 points: Limited understanding of ethical principles and weak application in the
case.
• Below 10 points: Insufficient understanding or ethically questionable decisions.

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions.

1. What is the primary role of accountants in financial reporting?

a) To ensure the company’s profitability
b) To present an accurate and truthful picture of the company’s financial position
c) To advise management on tax planning
d) To manipulate financial statements to secure investments
2. Which of the following is NOT an ethical principle in financial reporting?
a) Transparency
b) Integrity
c) Objectivity
d) Profit maximization
3. What can be a consequence of unethical financial reporting?
a) Increased public trust in financial markets
b) Legal penalties, such as fines or imprisonment
c) Enhanced company reputation
d) Increased investor confidence
4. What is the most important principle that accountants must adhere to when
preparing financial reports?
a) Confidentiality
b) Professional competence
c) Objectivity and transparency
d) Personal relationships with management
5. Which of the following actions would be considered unethical in financial
reporting?
a) Adjusting financial statements to reflect actual financial performance
b) Reporting financial data in accordance with accounting standards

MRTA, 2025
48
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

c) Altering financial figures to meet company

targets
d) Ensuring the accuracy of financial records
6. What is the purpose of adhering to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP)?
a) To maximize a company’s profits
b) To ensure transparency and reliability in financial statements
c) To help accountants avoid taxes
d) To comply with legal requirements only
7. What is the potential result of fraudulent financial reporting?
a) Trust and confidence in the company’s financial statements are strengthened
b) Legal action, including penalties and lawsuits
c) Increased financial gains for the company
d) A stronger reputation for the accounting profession
8. Which ethical principle requires accountants to avoid conflicts of interest when
preparing financial reports?
a) Integrity
b) Objectivity
c) Transparency
d) Confidentiality
9. What is the main consequence of not following ethical guidelines in financial
reporting?
a) Short-term financial gain
b) Damage to the company’s long-term reputation and public trust
c) Improved relationships with investors
d) Increased investor trust and support
10. What should an accountant do if they are asked to falsify financial statements?
a) Comply with the request to meet company goals
b) Discuss the issue with the management team to find a compromise
c) Refuse to comply and report the issue to the appropriate authorities
d) Ignore the request and continue with their work

References

https://orangeiq.com.au/why-are-ethics-important-in-financial-statements/

https://dokka.com/accounting-integrity-and-ethics/

https://online.mason.wm.edu/blog/the-importance-of-ethics-and-professional-

standards-in-the-accounting-industry

https://www.cpacredits.com/resources/accounting-ethics-importance/

https://www.bolton.ac.uk/blogs/ethics-and-integrity-in-financial-reporting

MRTA, 2025
49
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT VII. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Define corporate responsibility and its ethical implications, focusing on the role
of corporations in contributing to social and environmental well-being.
2. Explain the importance of ethics in corporate governance, highlighting the
relationship between ethical leadership, accountability, and decision-making
processes in corporations.
3. Assess the role of accountants in sustainability reporting and their responsibility
in ensuring accurate and ethical disclosures regarding social and
environmental impact.
4. Evaluate the ethical considerations in corporate governance and sustainability
reporting, identifying how businesses can align their practices with broader
societal values and sustainable development goals.

Introduction

Accountants play a vital role in sustainability reporting, which involves

disclosing a company's social and environmental impacts alongside its financial

performance. As stewards of financial information, accountants are responsible for

ensuring that sustainability reports are accurate, transparent, and compliant with

relevant standards. This responsibility extends to verifying that disclosures reflect the

true nature of a company's operations and their effects on society and the

environment. By adhering to ethical standards in sustainability reporting, accountants

contribute to informed decision-making by stakeholders and help organizations align

their practices with broader societal values.

7.1. Corporate Responsibility and Its Ethical Implications

Corporate responsibility (CR) refers to the ethical obligation of companies to
operate in a way that benefits society, the environment, and the economy, balancing
the interests of stakeholders. It goes beyond financial profit and includes
environmental sustainability, social welfare, and ethical labor practices.

MRTA, 2025
50
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Key Concepts in Corporate Responsibility:

• Environmental Responsibility: Companies must reduce their negative
environmental impact by adopting sustainable practices like reducing waste,
conserving energy, and minimizing their carbon footprint.
• Social Responsibility: Corporations should ensure ethical practices that
protect human rights, promote fair labor standards, contribute to community
welfare, and engage in philanthropy.
• Economic Responsibility: Companies are expected to operate transparently
and fairly, comply with laws, and contribute to economic development while
minimizing any negative impact on stakeholders.

Ethical Implications:
Corporate responsibility is critical because businesses are not isolated from the
societies in which they operate. If corporations focus solely on maximizing profits
without regard for social and environmental impacts, they can contribute to societal
inequalities, environmental degradation, and other ethical concerns. Businesses that
are socially responsible demonstrate long-term sustainability, enhance their
reputation, and build trust with their stakeholders.

7.2. Ethics in Corporate Governance

Corporate governance involves the system of rules, practices, and processes
by which companies are directed and controlled. It is crucial in ensuring the company’s
integrity, responsibility, and sustainability.

Importance of Ethics in Corporate Governance:

1. Ethical Leadership: Leaders set the ethical tone for the entire organization.
Ethical leadership involves promoting transparency, accountability, and
honesty. Ethical leaders make decisions based on integrity, fostering an
organizational culture where ethical behavior is expected and rewarded.
2. Accountability: Accountability in corporate governance ensures that corporate
leaders and other stakeholders take responsibility for their actions. Ethical
accountability involves ensuring that corporate leaders are answerable to
stakeholders for their decisions, particularly when those decisions affect public
trust or social responsibility.
3. Decision-Making Processes: Ethical decision-making in corporate
governance requires that companies balance the interests of all stakeholders,
including shareholders, employees, customers, and society at large. Ethical
governance prioritizes long-term value creation over short-term gains.

7.3. The Role of Accountants in Sustainability Reporting

Sustainability reporting involves disclosing a company’s performance on
environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters. Accountants are responsible
for ensuring that sustainability reports are accurate, ethical, and comply with
international standards.

Key Responsibilities of Accountants in Sustainability Reporting:

1. Ensuring Accuracy and Integrity: Accountants must ensure that the data
provided in sustainability reports is truthful, verifiable, and consistent. This
includes tracking environmental and social impacts like emissions, energy
usage, and community involvement.

MRTA, 2025
51
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

2. Transparency: Accountants help ensure

that sustainability reports are transparent and free from misleading information.
Transparent reporting helps stakeholders, including investors, customers, and
regulators, assess a company’s true impact on society and the environment.
3. Ethical Disclosures: Accountants must safeguard against greenwashing—
making misleading claims about environmental practices. Ethical accountants
provide balanced reports, acknowledging areas for improvement while also
highlighting positive contributions.

The Growing Importance of Sustainability Reporting:

As businesses increasingly face pressure from investors, regulators, and
consumers to be more transparent about their environmental and social impacts,
accountants play a critical role in ensuring that the disclosures are accurate, reliable,
and ethically sound.

7.4. Ethical Considerations in Corporate Governance and Sustainability

Reporting
Ethical considerations in corporate governance and sustainability reporting
revolve around aligning business practices with broader societal values, such as
sustainability and fairness. Companies must consider the long-term effects of their
operations on the environment, society, and the economy.

Key Ethical Considerations:

1. Stakeholder Inclusivity: Ethical governance requires businesses to consider
the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, consumers, investors,
and the local communities where the business operates. By prioritizing the
needs of diverse stakeholders, businesses can make ethical decisions that lead
to long-term sustainability.
2. Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Ethical corporate
governance and sustainability reporting should aim to align with the United
Nations' SDGs. These goals include eradicating poverty, ensuring quality
education, reducing inequalities, and combating climate change. Companies
should assess how their operations contribute to or hinder these global goals.
3. Transparency and Accountability: Ethical businesses ensure that their
sustainability reports are free from manipulation or distortion. They are held
accountable for their environmental and social impact and provide transparent
disclosures to all stakeholders.
4. Avoiding Greenwashing: As businesses seek to demonstrate their
commitment to sustainability, there is a risk of exaggerating or misrepresenting
their efforts—referred to as greenwashing. Ethical companies must avoid this
practice by ensuring that all claims made in sustainability reports are
substantiated with factual data.

Conclusion
In conclusion, corporate responsibility is integral to fostering ethical behavior
within organizations. The role of ethics in corporate governance is critical for promoting
accountability and guiding decision-making processes. Accountants have a significant
responsibility in ensuring accurate sustainability reporting, which enhances
transparency regarding social and environmental impacts. By aligning business
practices with ethical considerations and societal values, companies can build trust

MRTA, 2025
52
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

with stakeholders while contributing to sustainable

development goals. Ultimately, embracing corporate responsibility not only benefits
society but also positions organizations for long-term success in an increasingly
conscientious marketplace.
Case Study Analysis

Analyzing Ethical Implications in Corporate Governance and Sustainability

Reporting

Case 1: Company X is a large multinational corporation that has claimed to reduce its
carbon emissions by 50% over the past year. However, internal audits reveal that the
company has not made significant changes to its manufacturing processes and
continues to use non-renewable resources. The company’s sustainability report
highlights only its charitable donations, omitting critical information about its
environmental impact.

Requirement:
• Identify the ethical issues related to corporate governance and sustainability
reporting.
• Analyze the consequences of these ethical issues for the company, focusing
on its reputation, financial performance, and public trust.
• Propose ethical solutions that would help Company X improve its corporate
governance and sustainability reporting.

Criteria for Judging the Activity:

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Comprehensive and Accurate Identification of
Identification of Basic identification No identification
insightful identification identification of most few or unclear
Ethical Issues of some issues of ethical issues
of all ethical issues ethical issues issues
Thorough analysis of
potential Clear analysis of Basic analysis of Minimal analysis
Analysis of No analysis of
consequences with consequences, but consequences, but with unclear
Consequences consequences
well-supported lacking some depth lacks clarity connections
reasoning
Innovative, practical, Practical and Acceptable Unclear or No proposed
Proposed Ethical
and well-justified reasonable solutions solutions with unrealistic solutions or poor
Solutions
solutions with justification limited justification solutions justification
Good application of
Application of Excellent application of Basic application of Weak or unclear
ethical principles with No application of
Ethical ethical principles with ethical principles application of
appropriate ethical principles
Principles strong reasoning with limited depth ethical principles
justification

MRTA, 2025
53
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions.

1. What does corporate responsibility primarily focus on?

a) Maximizing profits at all costs
b) The social, environmental, and economic impact of a company's actions
c) Maintaining compliance with government regulations
d) Focusing only on shareholder interests
2. Which of the following is NOT a key element of ethical corporate
governance?
a) Transparency
b) Ethical leadership
c) Short-term profitability
d) Accountability
3. What is the role of accountants in sustainability reporting?
a) Ensuring the accuracy and reliability of environmental data
b) Maximizing the financial profit of the company
c) Keeping financial information confidential
d) Overseeing marketing strategies
4. Which of the following best describes "greenwashing"?
a) Truthfully reporting environmental impact
b) Misleading stakeholders about a company’s environmental practices
c) Encouraging employees to adopt green initiatives
d) Investing in renewable energy
5. What is one of the main ethical responsibilities of businesses in
sustainability reporting?
a) To misrepresent the impact of their operations to attract customers
b) To ensure transparency and provide honest disclosures
c) To avoid discussing any negative environmental impact
d) To focus only on financial disclosures
6. What is the relationship between ethical leadership and corporate
governance?
a) Ethical leadership ensures accountability and integrity within the organization
b) Ethical leadership focuses solely on maximizing profits
c) Ethical leadership discourages transparency in decision-making
d) Ethical leadership avoids discussions of social responsibility
7. How can businesses align their practices with the United Nations’
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)?
a) By focusing only on financial growth
b) By considering environmental and social impacts and taking steps to improve
them
c) By ignoring regulatory compliance and focusing solely on profits
d) By increasing production without regard for sustainability
8. Which of the following is an example of ethical corporate governance?
a) A company discloses all financial and sustainability information transparently
b) A company avoids discussing labor conditions to protect its reputation
c) A company focuses on maximizing short-term profits without regard to the

MRTA, 2025
54
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

environment
d) A company hides its environmental impact to avoid scrutiny
9. What is the primary purpose of sustainability reporting?
a) To enhance a company’s public image without addressing real issues
b) To provide stakeholders with accurate and honest information about a company’s
environmental and social impact
c) To avoid revealing the company's financial statements
d) To promote internal employee policies
10. What role does transparency play in corporate governance?
a) It helps businesses hide sensitive information from stakeholders
b) It ensures that decisions are made in an open and accountable manner
c) It allows businesses to avoid legal compliance
d) It enables companies to overstate their environmental efforts

References

https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1236&context=irbe

https://www.pacificoaks.edu/voices/business/breaking-down-the-4-types-of-

corporate-social-responsibility/

https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/218562/1/sajbm-v46i1-0079.pdf

https://pachamama.org/social-justice/social-responsibility-and-ethics

MRTA, 2025
55
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT VIII. FRAUD AND UNETHICAL PRACTICES

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Define and recognize fraud in the context of accounting and financial reporting,
identifying common fraudulent practices and behaviors.
2. Analyze real-world examples of unethical practices in accounting, such as
financial misstatements, falsification of records, and conflicts of interest.
3. Understand the role of ethics in auditing, including how auditors detect and
address fraud while maintaining professional integrity.
4. Apply ethical principles to detect potential fraud in financial statements and
propose actions auditors can take to prevent and address fraudulent activities.

Introduction

Fraud in accounting and financial reporting is a serious issue that undermines

the integrity of financial information and can have far-reaching consequences for
companies and stakeholders alike. Defined as the intentional manipulation of financial
statements to create a misleading representation of a company's financial health,
fraud encompasses various practices and behaviors. Common fraudulent activities
include overstating revenues, understating expenses, misrepresenting assets, and
concealing liabilities. For example, companies may prematurely recognize revenue
from sales that have not yet occurred or fail to report certain debts to present a more
favorable financial picture. Such actions not only violate ethical standards but also
breach legal regulations, leading to significant repercussions for both the individuals
involved and the organization as a whole.

8.1. Fraud in Accounting and Financial Reporting

Fraud in accounting refers to intentional misrepresentation or manipulation of
financial information to deceive stakeholders, such as investors, creditors, or
regulators. Fraudulent activities may be conducted by employees, management, or
even external parties.

Types of Fraud in Accounting:

• Financial Statement Fraud: This occurs when a company intentionally
misrepresents its financial statements to present a more favorable picture of its
financial health. Common techniques include inflating revenues, understating
liabilities, and falsifying asset values.
• Asset Misappropriation: This involves the theft or misuse of company assets
by employees, such as embezzlement or stealing inventory.
• Corruption: Involves conflicts of interest or unethical behavior, such as bribery,
kickbacks, and fraudulent vendor relationships.

MRTA, 2025
56
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

• Falsification of Records: This can include

altering or destroying financial documents to cover up fraud or to avoid
detection of unethical behavior.

Recognizing Fraud:
Fraud often follows certain red flags or patterns, such as:
• Unexplained discrepancies in financial statements
• Unusual or unauthorized transactions
• Pressure from management to meet financial targets
• Inadequate internal controls

8.2. Real-World Examples of Unethical Practices in Accounting

Many high-profile corporate scandals highlight the prevalence of unethical
accounting practices. Understanding these examples is crucial for identifying fraud
and unethical behavior in real-world settings.

Case 1: Enron Scandal

Enron, once one of the largest energy companies in the United States, engaged
in financial reporting fraud that misled investors and stakeholders. The company used
off-balance-sheet entities to hide debt and inflated profits. When the fraud was
exposed, Enron filed for bankruptcy, causing significant financial losses and damaging
public trust in corporate accounting.

Case 2: WorldCom
WorldCom, a telecommunications company, inflated its earnings by capitalizing
operating expenses, which led to an overstatement of its assets and profits. The
company’s CEO, Bernard Ebbers, was later convicted for his role in the scheme,
leading to a loss of billions in shareholder value.

Case 3: Toshiba Accounting Scandal

Toshiba, a Japanese multinational, was found to have inflated its profits by over
$1 billion over a period of seven years. The company misled stakeholders with
fraudulent accounting practices, such as improperly recognizing revenue and delaying
costs. The scandal led to a major restructuring and loss of public trust.
These cases illustrate the devastating consequences of unethical accounting
practices, both in terms of financial loss and reputational damage.

8.3. The Role of Ethics in Auditing

Auditors play a critical role in ensuring the accuracy and integrity of financial
statements. Their responsibility is to detect fraud, identify misstatements, and ensure
that financial reporting complies with ethical and regulatory standards.

Ethical Responsibilities of Auditors:

• Independence: Auditors must maintain independence from the companies
they audit to avoid conflicts of interest and ensure objective evaluations.
• Professional Skepticism: Auditors are required to approach their work with a
questioning mindset, considering the possibility of fraud or errors even when
evidence suggests otherwise.

MRTA, 2025
57
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

• Confidentiality: Auditors must maintain the

confidentiality of the information they come across during their work, ensuring
that they do not disclose sensitive information without authorization.
• Due Care: Auditors must exercise due diligence in conducting audits and be
thorough in reviewing financial statements and internal controls.

Detecting and Addressing Fraud:

• Risk Assessment: Auditors assess the risk of fraud by considering the internal
controls, management’s behavior, and any incentives for fraudulent behavior.
• Testing Transactions: Auditors test individual transactions for accuracy and
completeness, looking for irregularities such as unusual transactions or
unauthorized expenses.
• Whistleblower Channels: Auditors should encourage employees to report any
fraudulent activity, ensuring that there are clear channels for whistleblowing.

8.4. Applying Ethical Principles to Detect and Prevent Fraud

Ethical principles guide auditors in detecting and preventing fraud. The
application of these principles requires an understanding of both the techniques used
in fraud and the ethical obligations of auditors.

Actions Auditors Can Take:

• Enhance Internal Controls: Auditors can recommend improvements in
internal controls to prevent fraud. This includes ensuring segregation of duties,
performing regular reconciliations, and implementing robust approval
processes.
• Conduct Thorough Testing: Auditors must conduct detailed audits that go
beyond surface-level checks. This may include examining specific transactions,
testing for fraudulent financial practices, and identifying patterns of
misreporting.
• Report Findings Transparently: If fraud is detected, auditors have an ethical
obligation to report their findings to relevant stakeholders, such as the board of
directors, regulators, or law enforcement agencies.
• Promote a Culture of Integrity: Auditors can help instill ethical practices within
an organization by encouraging transparency and accountability throughout the
company.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding fraud in accounting is essential for safeguarding

the integrity of financial reporting. The analysis of real-world cases underscores the
severe consequences associated with unethical practices, highlighting the need for
strong ethical standards within the profession. Auditors play a vital role in detecting
fraud through rigorous adherence to ethical principles while ensuring transparency in
financial statements. By applying these principles effectively, accountants can mitigate
risks associated with fraud and contribute to a culture of accountability that reinforces
public trust in the accounting profession.

MRTA, 2025
58
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Case Study Analysis

Case Study:
XYZ Corp., a publicly traded company, has been experiencing significant
financial difficulties. In an effort to improve its financial outlook, the CFO has suggested
manipulating the company’s revenue recognition practices. The CFO proposes
recognizing revenue from sales that have not yet been completed to show an inflated
profit for the current quarter.

Requirement:
1. Identify the ethical issues present in the case.
2. Analyze the consequences of these actions for the company, its
shareholders, and other stakeholders.
3. Propose ethical solutions to address the situation and prevent similar
occurrences in the future.
4. Recommend actions for auditors to detect and report such fraudulent
practices.

Grading Rubric for Student Activity:

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Improvement Poor (1)
(2)
Thorough and Accurate
Basic Identification of
Identification of accurate identification of No identification
identification of few or unclear
Ethical Issues identification of all most ethical of ethical issues
some issues issues
ethical issues issues
Comprehensive
analysis of all Basic analysis of
Clear analysis of Limited analysis
Analysis of potential consequences, No analysis of
consequences, with unclear
Consequences consequences, some consequences
but lacking depth connections
well-supported by inconsistencies
evidence
Innovative and Acceptable No proposed
Proposed Practical solutions Unclear or
feasible solutions solutions with solutions or
Ethical with reasonable unrealistic
that address the minimal irrelevant
Solutions justification solutions
issue effectively justification solutions
Good application
Excellent Basic application Weak or unclear
Application of of ethical No application of
application of ethical of ethical application of
Ethical principles with ethical
principles with clear principles, limited ethical
Principles appropriate principles
reasoning depth principles
justification

MRTA, 2025
59
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions

1. What is the primary goal of fraud detection in accounting?

a) To protect the company's reputation
b) To ensure transparency and accuracy in financial reporting
c) To minimize tax liabilities
d) To maximize profits
2. Which of the following is an example of financial statement fraud?
a) Reporting revenue that was not earned
b) Reporting operational expenses accurately
c) Properly valuing assets
d) Recording all transactions on time
3. What is the role of auditors in detecting fraud?
a) To prepare financial statements
b) To ensure compliance with tax laws
c) To examine financial statements and identify discrepancies or fraudulent activities
d) To manage company operations
4. Which of the following is a red flag for potential fraud in financial reporting?
a) Consistent revenue growth with no unusual fluctuations
b) Unexplained discrepancies in financial documents
c) Transparent disclosure of all accounting methods
d) Detailed footnotes in financial statements
5. What is "asset misappropriation"?
a) Overstating revenue
b) Stealing or misusing company assets
c) Misreporting financial liabilities
d) Manipulating stock prices
6. Which of the following best describes “greenwashing”?
a) Promoting environmental responsibility through unethical means
b) Providing accurate environmental disclosures
c) Encouraging employees to engage in environmentally friendly practices
d) Reporting environmental data to meet regulatory requirements
7. What is one of the ethical responsibilities of auditors?
a) To help the company avoid taxes
b) To identify and report fraudulent activity in financial reports
c) To disclose confidential client information to third parties
d) To assist in preparing company tax returns
8. What is the consequence of fraudulent financial reporting?
a) Increased trust from investors
b) Legal actions, loss of reputation, and financial losses
c) Greater shareholder value
d) Improved public image
9. What action should auditors take when they suspect fraud?
a) Ignore the suspicions and proceed with the audit
b) Report findings to management and take appropriate actions to address the issue
c) Cover up the fraud to protect the company’s reputation
d) Delay the audit until more evidence is gathered

MRTA, 2025
60
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

10. What is the concept of “professional

skepticism” in auditing?
a) Believing everything management says without question
b) Questioning the validity of financial statements and examining potential fraud
c) Avoiding conflicts of interest with clients
d) Accepting financial reports at face value

References

https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/blog/how-to-spot-accounting-fraud/

https://kkc.com/frequently-asked-questions/what-is-accounting-fraud/

https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/accounting/financial-statement-

fraud.shtml

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/032715/what-accounting-fraud.asp

https://www.zoho.com/practice/academy/what-is-accounting-fraud.html

https://trustpair.com/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-accounting-fraud/

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/11/detecting-financial-

fraud.asp

MRTA, 2025
61
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT IX. ETHICS IN TAXATION AND AUDITING

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Identify ethical issues in tax planning and auditing practices, including tax
evasion, tax avoidance, and conflicts of interest.
2. Explain the role of tax accountants and auditors in maintaining ethical
standards, ensuring compliance with tax laws, and preventing unethical
financial practices.
3. Apply ethical decision-making frameworks to assess tax planning strategies
and auditing practices, ensuring they align with ethical principles and legal
requirements.
4. Evaluate the ethical responsibilities of tax accountants and auditors in ensuring
transparent, honest, and fair tax reporting.

Introduction

Ethics in tax planning and auditing is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the
financial system, ensuring fair tax reporting, and building public trust. Tax accountants
and auditors are responsible for ensuring that tax reporting is accurate, legal, and
compliant with the law. This involves navigating ethical challenges such as tax
evasion, tax avoidance, and conflicts of interest.
Furthermore, evaluating the ethical responsibilities of tax accountants and
auditors involves ensuring transparent, honest, and fair tax reporting. Accountants
must be vigilant in their duty to disclose all relevant information accurately while
avoiding misleading representations of a client's financial status. This commitment to
ethical conduct is vital for maintaining stakeholder trust and fostering a culture of
accountability within organizations. By aligning their practices with societal values and
sustainable development goals, accountants can contribute positively to the broader
community while fulfilling their professional obligations.

9.1. Ethical Issues in Tax Planning and Auditing Practices

Tax Evasion vs. Tax Avoidance

• Tax Evasion: This involves illegal activities to avoid paying taxes. Common
practices include underreporting income, inflating deductions, or hiding assets.
Tax evasion is a criminal offense and can lead to severe legal consequences.

MRTA, 2025
62
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

• Tax Avoidance: This refers to the legal use

of tax laws and regulations to reduce one's tax burden. However, while tax
avoidance is legal, aggressive or overly complex tax avoidance schemes can
raise ethical questions. For example, using loopholes to shift profits to tax
havens may be legal but considered unethical if it contradicts the intent of tax
laws.
• Conflicts of Interest: Tax accountants and auditors face conflicts of interest
when personal, professional, or financial interests influence their work. For
instance, an auditor may be biased if they have a financial stake in the client’s
success or a personal relationship with the business owners.

9.2. The Role of Tax Accountants and Auditors in Ethical Practices

Tax Accountants:
Tax accountants are responsible for preparing and reviewing tax returns, advising
clients on tax planning strategies, and ensuring compliance with tax laws. Their ethical
duties include:
• Maintaining integrity: Ensuring that tax filings are honest and accurate.
• Preventing tax evasion: Identifying and addressing potential fraudulent
activities.
• Advising clients ethically: While clients may seek ways to minimize taxes, tax
accountants must avoid advising clients on schemes that are legally
questionable or violate the spirit of the tax law.

Tax Auditors:
Tax auditors examine the financial records of businesses to ensure that tax reports
are accurate and comply with the law. Their responsibilities include:
• Objectivity and independence: Ensuring their judgment is not influenced by
personal interests or relationships.
• Identifying fraudulent tax practices: Detecting irregularities such as
unreported income or false deductions.
• Ensuring compliance: Auditors must verify that companies are adhering to tax
laws and regulations.

9.3. Ethical Decision-Making Frameworks in Tax Planning and Auditing

To address ethical dilemmas in tax planning and auditing, tax accountants and
auditors can apply ethical decision-making frameworks. These frameworks guide
professionals in making decisions that align with ethical standards and legal
requirements.

Ethical Decision-Making Frameworks:

• Utilitarianism: This approach suggests that decisions should be made based
on the greatest good for the greatest number. In tax planning, this means
avoiding strategies that benefit a few at the expense of the many, such as using
tax avoidance techniques that deprive governments of essential resources.
• Deontological Ethics: According to deontological ethics, the rightness or
wrongness of an action is based on adherence to rules, rather than outcomes.
For auditors and tax accountants, this means strictly following tax laws and
regulations, regardless of the financial benefits that may arise from bending the
rules.

MRTA, 2025
63
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

• Virtue Ethics: This approach focuses on

the moral character of the individual making the decision. Tax accountants and
auditors should strive to act with integrity, fairness, and transparency, ensuring
that their actions reflect their professional virtues.

9.4. Ethical Responsibilities of Tax Accountants and Auditors

Tax accountants and auditors have a range of ethical responsibilities to ensure that
their practices align with professional standards, promote fairness, and protect the
public interest:
• Transparency: Ensuring that tax reports are clear, accurate, and complete.
• Honesty: Reporting all necessary information truthfully and avoiding the
manipulation of financial records.
• Accountability: Being accountable for their decisions and actions, and
acknowledging any potential conflicts of interest.
• Fairness: Ensuring that all taxpayers are treated fairly and that no one is given
preferential treatment due to influence or power.

Tax accountants and auditors must understand and respect the ethical standards
of their profession, which include maintaining public trust, adhering to legal
requirements, and preventing practices like tax evasion.

Conclusion
In conclusion, addressing ethical issues in tax planning and auditing practices is
critical for safeguarding the integrity of the accounting profession. Tax accountants
and auditors play a pivotal role in ensuring compliance with laws while preventing
unethical financial practices through adherence to ethical standards. By applying
decision-making frameworks and evaluating their responsibilities diligently, these
professionals can navigate complex scenarios effectively, promoting transparency and
trust in financial reporting. Ultimately, fostering an ethical culture within the accounting
profession not only benefits individual practitioners but also enhances public
confidence in the integrity of financial systems as a whole.

Case Study Analysis

Case 1: The Overstated Deduction

A tax accountant is working with a client who wants to claim large deductions
for business expenses that appear to be inflated. The client is insistent that these
deductions are legitimate but cannot provide adequate documentation. The
accountant knows that the deductions are likely questionable but feels pressured by
the client to approve them.

Requirement:
1. Identify the ethical issues present in this case (e.g., tax evasion, conflicts of
interest).
2. Analyze the potential consequences of approving these deductions for the
accountant, the client, and the broader public.
3. Apply ethical decision-making frameworks (e.g., utilitarianism, deontology,
virtue ethics) to assess the best course of action.
4. Propose ethical solutions to handle the situation and ensure compliance with
tax laws.

MRTA, 2025
64
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Rubric for Case Study Analysis:

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Comprehensive
Identifies most Limited No clear
Identification of identification of all Basic identification
issues with good identification of identification of
Ethical Issues ethical issues with clear of key issues
explanation issues, lacks clarity ethical issues
explanation
Thorough, well- Good analysis of Adequate analysis Superficial or No analysis or
Analysis of
supported analysis of all consequences, with of consequences, unclear analysis of unclear
Consequences
consequences some depth limited depth consequences consequences
Excellent use of ethical Good use of No use of
Application of Limited use of Weak or incorrect
decision-making frameworks, with frameworks or
Ethical frameworks with application of
frameworks, with reasonable incorrect
Frameworks basic explanation frameworks
detailed explanation explanation reasoning
Well-thought-out,
Practical solutions Adequate solutions Weak or unclear No solutions or
Proposed Ethical realistic solutions with
with good with some ethical solutions, lacks irrelevant
Solutions strong ethical
justification reasoning ethical justification proposals
justification

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions.

1. Which of the following is an example of tax evasion?

a) Using legal loopholes to reduce tax liability
b) Overstating income to claim tax refunds
c) Properly claiming allowable business deductions
d) Reporting income honestly on tax returns
2. What is the key difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance?
a) Tax evasion is legal, while tax avoidance is illegal
b) Tax evasion involves fraud, while tax avoidance uses legal methods to minimize
taxes
c) Tax evasion uses tax shelters, while tax avoidance does not
d) Tax evasion is done by businesses, while tax avoidance is done by individuals
3. What role do tax accountants play in maintaining ethical standards?
a) Advise clients on tax evasion strategies
b) Ensure compliance with tax laws and report taxes honestly
c) Minimize taxes regardless of the legal or ethical implications
d) Avoid auditing practices to maintain client relationships
4. What is a conflict of interest in tax accounting?
a) Reporting tax information honestly
b) Tax evasion and fraud
c) An accountant's personal financial interest affecting their professional judgment
d) Preparing tax returns on time
5. What is the key ethical responsibility of auditors in tax-related audits?
a) To ensure that clients maximize their tax savings
b) To identify and report fraudulent tax reporting practices
c) To minimize auditing costs for clients
d) To provide tax planning advice to clients
6. Which ethical framework focuses on following rules and laws regardless of
the consequences?

MRTA, 2025
65
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

a) Utilitarianism
b) Deontology
c) Virtue Ethics
d) Relativism
7. What is the potential consequence of tax evasion for a business?
a) Increased profits
b) Legal penalties, including fines or imprisonment
c) Improved public image
d) Better tax rebates
8. Which of the following is an example of a conflict of interest in tax auditing?
a) The auditor has a financial stake in the company being audited
b) The auditor reviews and signs off on tax returns without reviewing the details
c) The auditor ensures all documents are properly filed
d) The auditor helps the company maximize tax deductions within legal limits
9. How can accountants ensure they are adhering to ethical tax practices?
a) By following clients' requests without questioning them
b) By using every legal method to reduce the client's tax liability
c) By adhering strictly to tax laws and avoiding any fraudulent practices
d) By advising clients on how to avoid audits
10. What is a key aspect of applying virtue ethics in tax planning?
a) Maximizing tax savings for clients at any cost
b) Ensuring personal benefits from tax planning decisions
c) Acting with integrity, fairness, and transparency
d) Following the latest tax laws without considering their impact

References

https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1361&context=umiclr

https://library.fiveable.me/tax-planning-administration/unit-17/ethical-considerations-

tax-planning-compliance/study-guide/WaU4G8LCLNUcGpTj

https://www.ethicsboard.org/news-events/2024-04/iesba-launches-first-global-ethics-

standards-tax-planning

https://www.ctf.ca/common/Uploaded%20files/CTJ%2072.1/Public%20Files/67_Publ

ic-2024CTJ1-PF-2-Latulippe.pdf

https://www.deloitte.com/nz/en/services/tax/perspectives/september-2024-are-you-

an-ethical-tax-advisor.html

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ethical-considerations-tax-planning-balancing-

strategy-gaspar-gkm7f

MRTA, 2025
66
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT X. GLOBAL ETHICAL STANDARDS IN ACCOUNTING

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Compare ethical standards for accountants in different countries,
understanding how cultural and legal contexts influence ethical practices in
accounting.
2. Understand the role of international ethical frameworks such as the
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) Code of Ethics and the ethical
guidelines of other global regulatory bodies.
3. Explain the significance of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
and other global accounting standards in ensuring ethical practices and
transparency in financial reporting.
4. Analyze the challenges and opportunities of applying ethical standards across
different jurisdictions and in global business practices.

Introduction

Ethics in accounting plays a critical role in maintaining trust and transparency

in financial reporting. Accountants worldwide are held to high standards of professional
conduct, but the ethical guidelines and frameworks can vary significantly depending
on the country. Factors such as legal systems, cultural differences, and business
practices influence the way accountants apply ethical standards in their work. This
discussion will explore the key international ethical frameworks, compare ethical
standards across jurisdictions, and discuss the challenges accountants face in
applying these standards globally.
The landscape of ethical standards for accountants varies significantly across
different countries, influenced by cultural norms, legal frameworks, and professional
practices. Understanding these differences is crucial for accountants working in a
globalized environment. For instance, while many countries adhere to the International
Federation of Accountants (IFAC) Code of Ethics, local regulations may impose
additional requirements or differ in their interpretation of ethical principles. In the
United States, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) provides
its own Code of Professional Conduct, which emphasizes independence and
objectivity but may be more prescriptive than the IFAC Code. Cultural factors also play
a role; for example, countries with collectivist cultures may prioritize group harmony
over individual accountability, affecting how ethical issues are approached in
accounting practices. Recognizing these variations helps accountants navigate ethical
dilemmas more effectively in diverse settings.

10.1. Comparing Ethical Standards Across Countries

Ethical standards in accounting are shaped by cultural, legal, and economic
contexts, making them different across countries. While the fundamental principles of
accounting ethics—such as integrity, objectivity, and transparency—are universally
recognized, the way these principles are enforced and interpreted can vary widely.

MRTA, 2025
67
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Examples of Cultural and Legal Influences:

• United States: In the U.S., ethical standards in accounting are governed by
bodies such as the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants)
and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The U.S. is known for
its strict regulatory environment, with laws such as Sarbanes-Oxley that
enforce transparency and accountability.
• China: In contrast, China's accounting profession has evolved rapidly, with
significant reforms in accounting practices due to its integration into the global
market. However, cultural factors, such as the emphasis on relationships
(guanxi), sometimes lead to less transparency and greater tolerance for "gray
areas" in accounting.
• Japan: Japan's accounting standards are influenced by both traditional
practices and international standards. The Japanese Institute of Certified
Public Accountants (JICPA) governs ethical standards, but the country's
culture of consensus and respect for hierarchy sometimes leads to
compromises in ethical decision-making.

Key Takeaway:
The application of ethical standards in accounting is highly influenced by local
legal systems and cultural norms. What is considered unethical in one country may be
tolerated or even overlooked in another, leading to varying ethical practices in
accounting.

10.2. Role of International Ethical Frameworks

International ethical frameworks aim to standardize ethical practices across
borders and ensure that accountants maintain high ethical standards globally. The
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), a global organization that
represents accountants, plays a central role in promoting ethical practices through its
Code of Ethics.
IFAC Code of Ethics:

The IFAC Code of Ethics provides guidance on the following:

• Integrity: Accountants should be straightforward and honest in all professional
and business relationships.
• Objectivity: Accountants should avoid conflicts of interest and not allow bias,
conflicts of interest, or undue influence of others to override professional or
business judgments.
• Professional Competence and Due Care: Accountants should maintain
professional knowledge and skill at the level required to ensure that clients or
employers receive competent professional service.
• Confidentiality: Accountants should respect the confidentiality of information
acquired during the course of their work.
• Professional Behavior: Accountants should comply with relevant laws and
regulations and avoid any actions that discredit the profession.

Global Regulatory Bodies:

Besides IFAC, other global bodies such as the International Accounting
Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
contribute to maintaining ethical standards by providing accounting frameworks like

MRTA, 2025
68
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

the International Financial Reporting Standards

(IFRS), which ensure consistency and transparency in global financial reporting.

10.3. The Significance of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)

IFRS is a set of global accounting standards developed by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB), aimed at creating a uniform set of rules for
financial reporting worldwide. The adoption of IFRS promotes transparency,
comparability, and consistency in financial statements, making it easier for investors
and stakeholders to make informed decisions across borders.

Why IFRS is Important:

• Transparency: By adopting IFRS, companies provide clearer financial
information, which enhances the trust investors place in financial statements.
• Consistency: IFRS helps create a consistent approach to financial reporting,
which is crucial for global businesses operating in multiple countries.
• Global Comparability: IFRS ensures that financial reports from companies
around the world are comparable, enabling cross-border investments and
capital flows.

Example:
The adoption of IFRS by European Union countries has helped streamline
financial reporting across member states, enabling a more integrated European
market.

10.4. Challenges and Opportunities in Applying Ethical Standards Globally

Challenges:
• Cultural Differences: The interpretation and enforcement of ethical standards
can vary based on cultural norms. In some countries, the concept of bribery or
corruption may be viewed differently, which could influence accounting
practices.
• Legal and Regulatory Variations: Different legal systems enforce different
standards, and some countries may have lax enforcement of accounting
regulations, making it harder to apply international standards consistently.
• Resource Constraints: In some regions, accountants may not have the
resources or training to fully understand and apply international ethical
frameworks like IFAC or IFRS.
Opportunities:
• Harmonization of Standards: The movement towards global
standardization in accounting practices, such as the widespread adoption of
IFRS, promotes ethical consistency.
• Cross-Border Investment: Ethical transparency in financial reporting through
globally accepted standards makes it easier for investors to assess risks and
opportunities in international markets.
• Training and Education: Global initiatives to improve the training of
accountants and auditors can help mitigate cultural biases and increase
adherence to international ethical frameworks.

MRTA, 2025
69
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding the comparative landscape of ethical standards

for accountants around the world is essential for navigating the complexities of
international finance. The role of international ethical frameworks like the IFAC Code
provides guidance that promotes consistency and integrity in accounting practices
globally. Additionally, IFRS plays a critical role in ensuring transparency and
accountability in financial reporting. While challenges exist in applying these standards
across different jurisdictions, they also offer opportunities for accountants to enhance
ethical practices on a global scale. Ultimately, fostering a culture of ethics within the
accounting profession not only benefits individual practitioners but also strengthens
public confidence in financial systems worldwide.

Case Study Analysis

Case 1: The Multinational Company and the Cultural Dilemma

A multinational company with operations in both the U.S. and China faces an
ethical dilemma. The company's U.S. division strictly adheres to U.S. GAAP and
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, but the Chinese division has developed a practice of
using informal accounting methods to minimize tax liabilities in line with local business
practices. The Chinese division has also been involved in questionable relationships
with local government officials.

Requirement:
1. Identify the ethical issues in this case related to differing standards between
the U.S. and China.
2. Apply the IFAC Code of Ethics and IFRS guidelines to assess the ethical
implications of these practices.
3. Analyze the consequences of these ethical lapses for the multinational
company, its stakeholders, and its reputation.
4. Propose a solution that ensures adherence to international ethical standards
while respecting local customs and laws.

Rubric for Grading Case Study Activity:

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Identifies and clearly Identifies most Identifies key issues Identifies limited
Identification of Fails to identify
explains all relevant ethical issues with but with minimal issues or lacks
Ethical Issues ethical issues
ethical issues good explanation explanation clarity
Excellent application Adequate
Application of Good application of Weak or incorrect
of IFAC Code and application of No application of
Ethical frameworks with application of
IFRS, with detailed frameworks with frameworks
Frameworks reasonable analysis frameworks
analysis some analysis
Thorough, well- Good analysis of Superficial or
Analysis of Basic analysis of No analysis of
supported analysis of consequences with unclear analysis of
Consequences consequences consequences
consequences some depth consequences
Well-reasoned,
Practical solutions Adequate solutions Weak or unclear No solutions or
Proposed practical solutions with
with good with some ethical solutions, lacks irrelevant
Solutions strong ethical
justification reasoning justification proposals
justification

MRTA, 2025
70
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Assessment: Multiple Choice

1. Which of the following is a key principle of the IFAC Code of Ethics?
a) Maximizing profits for clients
b) Objectivity and avoiding conflicts of interest
c) Allowing clients to manage their own tax reporting
d) Minimizing disclosure of financial risks
2. What does IFRS stand for?
a) International Financial and Regulatory Standards
b) International Financial Reporting Standards
c) International Federation of Regulatory Standards
d) International Framework for Reporting Standards
3. Which of the following is an ethical issue when accountants work across
different cultures?
a) Applying a uniform ethical framework across all jurisdictions
b) Respecting local customs while adhering to international standards
c) Prioritizing cultural norms over legal regulations
d) Ignoring local laws in favor of international regulations
4. The role of ethical frameworks in international accounting includes:
a) Eliminating all differences between local accounting practices
b) Ensuring consistent and transparent financial reporting globally
c) Allowing companies to avoid international laws when necessary
d) Protecting the interests of shareholders only
5. The main challenge of applying IFRS across different jurisdictions is:
a) Lack of enforcement in some countries
b) Increased transparency in financial reporting
c) Global comparability of financial statements
d) Standardization of ethical behavior across cultures
6. Which of the following is a benefit of applying IFRS globally?
a) Reduced transparency in financial reports
b) Increased investor confidence and ease of cross-border investment
c) Easier for businesses to avoid taxes
d) More opportunities for ethical violations in financial reporting
7. Which organization promotes global ethical standards for accountants?
a) SEC
b) AICPA
c) IFAC
d) FASB
8. How can accountants ensure ethical behavior across different cultures?
a) By strictly following local practices without questioning them
b) By adopting international standards while respecting local cultural contexts
c) By ignoring local customs and focusing on global standards only
d) By following the practices of the largest local companies
9. Which of the following is an ethical challenge for accountants in
multinational companies?
a) Disregarding local tax laws in favor of global standards
b) Navigating different legal systems and cultural expectations
c) Following only local accounting standards
d) Overlooking conflicts of interest in local business practices
10. What is one way in which the application of global ethical standards can be
challenging?

MRTA, 2025
71
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

a) It can lead to conflicts between local and

international regulations
b) It simplifies tax evasion practices
c) It encourages companies to ignore international guidelines
d) It guarantees the elimination of all financial discrepancies

References

https://www.ethicsboard.org/news-events/2022-05/iesba-staff-releases-

benchmarking-report-comparing-international-independence-standards-us-sec-and

http://www.uhu.es/ijdar/10.4192/1577-8517-v20_5.pdf

https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2010/oct/20103002.html

https://www.ethicsboard.org/publications/benchmarking-international-independence-

standards

https://www.elgaronline.com/abstract/book/9781800889712/chapter3.xml

https://www.ifac.org/knowledge-gateway/discussion/international-code-ethics-

professional-accountants-key-areas-focus-smes-and-smps

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238090424_Analysis_Of_International_Ethi

cal_Standards_In_Accounting

MRTA, 2025
72
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT XI. ETHICAL LEADERSHIP AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Learning Objectives:

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Explain the importance of leadership in fostering ethical behavior within an
organization and maintaining an ethical organizational culture.
2. Identify the characteristics of ethical leadership, including transparency,
integrity, and accountability, and understand how leaders influence ethical
decision-making.
3. Analyze strategies for building an ethical culture within organizations, focusing
on policies, training, and the role of leadership in modeling ethical behavior.
4. Assess how leading by example helps promote ethical behavior and decision-
making across an organization

Introduction

Leadership plays a crucial role in shaping an organization's culture and guiding

ethical behavior. Ethical leadership is the practice of leaders making decisions based
on ethical principles and modeling this behavior for others. It is essential for fostering
an organizational culture where integrity, honesty, and accountability are prioritized. A
leader’s behavior significantly influences how employees make decisions and
approach their daily tasks, ensuring the organization’s values align with its practices.
In an ethical organizational culture, employees feel a responsibility to act
ethically, and they understand that unethical behavior will not be tolerated. Leadership
sets the tone, establishing expectations for ethical behavior through clear
communication, policies, training, and consistent modeling of ethical decisions.

11.1. The Importance of Leadership in Fostering Ethical Behavior

Effective leadership is essential in fostering an ethical culture within an
organization. Ethical leadership means guiding the organization through principled
decision-making, which, in turn, creates an environment where employees are
motivated to follow ethical practices. When leaders set the example, they influence
how employees think about ethical dilemmas and how they handle conflicts.

Key Role of Leadership:

• Establishing Clear Values and Expectations: Leaders must clearly define
the organization’s values and expectations about ethical behavior. This
includes transparency in communication, a commitment to fairness, and
holding themselves and others accountable for ethical decision-making.
• Inspiring Trust: Trust in leadership is essential for employees to feel that
ethical behavior is valued. Leaders can inspire trust by consistently
demonstrating their ethical commitments and reinforcing a shared vision of
what the organization stands for.

MRTA, 2025
73
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

• Creating a Safe Environment for Ethical

Discussions: Leaders should create an open environment where employees
feel comfortable discussing ethical dilemmas and raising concerns without fear
of retaliation.

11.2. Characteristics of Ethical Leadership

Ethical leaders are individuals who consistently demonstrate behaviors aligned
with ethical principles. They influence the organization’s ethical climate through their
actions and decision-making processes. Key characteristics of ethical leadership
include:

Key Characteristics:
• Integrity: Ethical leaders are truthful, honest, and uphold strong moral
principles in both personal and professional settings.
• Transparency: These leaders openly share information and ensure their
decision-making processes are clear and understandable to all stakeholders.
• Accountability: Ethical leaders take responsibility for their actions, admit
mistakes when they occur, and take corrective measures.
• Fairness: They make decisions impartially, ensuring that all employees are
treated with respect and that organizational processes are just and equitable.
• Empathy and Respect: Ethical leaders demonstrate care for the well-being of
others, fostering a supportive and ethical work environment.
Leaders with these traits serve as role models and encourage others to act
ethically, ensuring that ethical decision-making becomes ingrained in the
organization’s culture.

11.3. Strategies for Building an Ethical Culture

Building and maintaining an ethical culture requires deliberate strategies,
including the development of clear policies, the establishment of training programs,
and the consistent involvement of leadership in modeling ethical behavior.

Key Strategies:
• Clear Ethical Policies: The organization should have well-defined ethical
guidelines and procedures, which include codes of conduct, conflict-of-interest
policies, and reporting channels for unethical behavior.
• Ethical Training Programs: Regular training sessions on ethics, legal
compliance, and the organization’s values help employees understand the
importance of ethics in the workplace and provide them with the tools to make
ethical decisions.
• Role of Leadership in Ethical Modeling: Leaders must actively engage in
ethical behavior and demonstrate it consistently. This includes following the
organization's codes of conduct, making ethical decisions, and engaging in
transparent practices.
• Ethical Decision-Making Tools: Providing employees with frameworks or
tools for ethical decision-making can help them navigate complex situations and
make choices aligned with the company’s values.

MRTA, 2025
74
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

11.4. Leading by Example to Promote Ethical Behavior

One of the most effective ways leaders can promote ethical behavior is by
leading by example. When leaders practice what they preach, they build credibility and
reinforce the organization’s ethical values.

Benefits of Leading by Example:

• Encouraging Ethical Decision-Making: Employees are more likely to make
ethical decisions when they observe their leaders doing the same. This is
especially true when leaders emphasize values such as honesty,
accountability, and respect.
• Creating Accountability: Leaders who hold themselves accountable set a
powerful example for the rest of the organization. When employees see leaders
owning up to mistakes, they are more likely to do the same.
• Strengthening Ethical Culture: By consistently demonstrating ethical
behavior, leaders can help instill these values in the organization, leading to a
strong ethical culture that influences the behavior of all employees.

Conclusion

In conclusion, effective leadership is critical in fostering an ethical

organizational culture. Ethical leaders embody transparency, integrity, and
accountability, setting a standard for others to follow. By implementing strategies that
build an ethical culture—such as establishing clear policies, providing training, and
modeling desired behaviors—organizations can create environments where ethical
decision-making thrives. Leading by example not only promotes adherence to ethical
standards but also cultivates trust and engagement among employees. Ultimately,
organizations that prioritize ethics in their leadership practices are better positioned
for long-term success and sustainability in today's complex business landscape.

Case Study Analysis: Ethical Leadership at ABC Corporation

Case Study Overview:

ABC Corporation, a multinational company, has recently faced issues with
employee dissatisfaction due to perceived favoritism and a lack of transparency in
promotions. Several employees have expressed concerns about the ethical behavior
of upper management, particularly in how promotions and salary increases are
awarded. A few employees feel that their promotions were unfairly influenced by
personal relationships rather than merit.
As the newly appointed CEO, you are tasked with addressing these concerns and
rebuilding trust within the organization. You have committed to promoting ethical
leadership and transparency to ensure that the organization’s ethical culture is
restored.

Requirement:
1. Identify Ethical Issues: What are the main ethical issues in this case? How
are they affecting the organization’s culture?

MRTA, 2025
75
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

2. Propose Ethical Solutions: What

strategies can you implement as CEO to address these issues and rebuild
trust? Include a plan for transparent communication, ethical decision-making,
and leadership accountability.
3. Build an Ethical Culture: How can you foster an ethical culture where fairness,
transparency, and integrity are prioritized? What role does leadership play in
this process?
4. Evaluate Impact: How will your proposed solutions impact employee morale,
organizational performance, and the company’s reputation?

Rubric for Grading the Case Study Analysis:

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Thoroughly identifies and Identifies most Identifies basic Identifies some
Identification of Fails to identify
clearly explains all relevant ethical issues with ethical issues, but issues but with
Ethical Issues ethical issues
ethical issues clear explanations lacks depth minimal explanation
Proposes practical No viable
Proposed Provides well-reasoned, Proposes solutions Solutions are weak
solutions with solutions or
Ethical practical solutions with but lacks detailed or unclear with little
reasonable irrelevant
Solutions strong ethical justification reasoning justification
justification proposals
Proposes a good
Provides a comprehensive Adequate plan but Weak or unclear
Building an plan but lacks No clear plan
and strategic plan for lacks key elements plan for fostering an
Ethical Culture some details or provided
fostering an ethical culture or specifics ethical culture
clarity
Evaluates the impact
Evaluates the
thoroughly, considering Evaluates impact but Minimal evaluation No evaluation
Impact impact with good
employee morale, lacks depth or key of impact with or irrelevant
Evaluation analysis of key
performance, and considerations unclear conclusions impact analysis
factors
reputation

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions.

1. What is a key characteristic of ethical leadership?

a) Favoritism towards certain employees
b) Transparency in decision-making
c) Avoiding difficult ethical decisions
d) Withholding information from employees
2. Which of the following is NOT a strategy for building an ethical culture
in an organization?
a) Ethical training programs
b) Encouraging unethical behavior for short-term gain
c) Clear ethical policies
d) Leadership modeling ethical behavior
3. What role does leadership play in promoting ethical behavior?
a) Leadership is irrelevant in promoting ethical behavior.
b) Leaders model ethical decision-making and hold others accountable.
c) Leaders make unethical decisions for the benefit of the company.
d) Leaders ignore ethical concerns to focus on profits.
4. Which of the following best describes integrity in ethical leadership?
a) Acting in accordance with personal gain
b) Being truthful, honest, and adhering to strong moral principles

MRTA, 2025
76
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

c) Making decisions based on company

profits
d) Avoiding transparency in decision-making
5. What is the first step in fostering an ethical culture in an organization?
a) Building an incentive program
b) Establishing clear ethical guidelines and policies
c) Focusing on financial performance
d) Ignoring ethical issues for future focus
6. Why is leading by example important in promoting ethical behavior?
a) Employees will follow unethical behavior set by leaders.
b) Leaders should not model behavior but instead enforce rules.
c) Employees are more likely to make ethical decisions when they see leaders
doing the same.
d) Leading by example is irrelevant to ethical decision-making.
7. Which of the following is a characteristic of ethical leadership?
a) Secrecy and withholding information
b) Accountability for actions and decisions
c) Favoring one employee over others
d) Disregarding employees’ concerns
8. How can leaders foster transparency in decision-making?
a) By sharing information only with senior management
b) By avoiding difficult decisions
c) By openly communicating decisions and their rationale to employees
d) By keeping decisions confidential for competitive advantage
9. What is one of the key challenges in building an ethical organizational
culture?
a) Encouraging employees to act unethically
b) Ensuring ethical leadership consistency across all levels
c) Ignoring unethical behavior to focus on productivity
d) Discouraging ethical decision-making
10. What is the role of training programs in building an ethical culture?
a) To promote unethical practices among employees
b) To ensure employees understand the ethical standards and decision-
making frameworks
c) To encourage employees to ignore ethical guidelines
d) To train employees only on financial policies

MRTA, 2025
77
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

References

https://www.workplaceethicsadvice.com/2021/08/the-role-of-ethical-leadership-in-

organizational-culture.html

https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/09/08/the-role-of-

ethical-leadership-in-long-term-organizational-success/

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/c-suite/ethical-leadership-fostering-a-

culture-of-responsibility-in-organizations/articleshow/104644391.cms

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/crucial-role-ethical-leadership-reflection-honor-past-

o-sullivan

https://www.northcentralcollege.edu/news/2023/05/24/role-ethical-leadership-

business

https://professional.dce.harvard.edu/blog/what-is-ethical-leadership-and-why-is-it-

important/

https://www.thomas.co/resources/type/hr-blog/what-ethical-leadership-attributes-

traits-examples

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371214209_The_role_of_ethical_leadershi

p_in_organizational_culture

MRTA, 2025
78
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

UNIT XII. REVIEW AND APPLICATION OF ETHICAL THEORIES

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

1. Analyze real-life case studies of ethical dilemmas in accounting, applying
ethical decision-making models to propose solutions and actions.
2. Evaluate the ethical challenges presented in the case studies, considering the
implications of various decisions on stakeholders and organizational
outcomes.
3. Review key ethical concepts learned throughout the course, integrating
knowledge of ethical theories, frameworks, and professional conduct in
accounting.
4. Demonstrate the ability to make ethical decisions in complex accounting
scenarios, considering both short-term and long-term consequences for
organizations and society.

Introduction

Ethical dilemmas in accounting arise when there is a conflict between different

ethical principles or when accountants face pressures to act in ways that may conflict
with professional conduct and standards. Accounting is a profession that demands
transparency, objectivity, and integrity, especially when it comes to reporting financial
information. These ethical challenges are not always clear-cut, as the consequences
of decisions can affect various stakeholders, including the company, employees,
shareholders, and the public.

To make informed, ethical decisions, accountants must apply ethical decision-

making models and consider both short-term and long-term impacts on their
profession, clients, and society. Ethical theories such as utilitarianism,
deontological ethics, and virtue ethics guide accountants in resolving these
dilemmas by balancing the consequences of their actions, adhering to rules, and
focusing on the moral character of their decisions.

12.1. Ethical Decision-Making Models in Accounting

Accountants often encounter situations where they must make decisions that
have moral implications. Ethical decision-making models are frameworks designed to
help individuals analyze and resolve these ethical challenges.

MRTA, 2025
79
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Utilitarianism:
This model focuses on the outcomes of decisions. The ethical choice is the one
that results in the greatest good for the greatest number of people. In accounting, this
could mean making decisions that benefit the majority of stakeholders, even if it means
sacrificing short-term gains for the company.

Deontological Ethics:
This framework emphasizes duties and rules. Ethical decisions are based on
the adherence to professional codes, laws, and duties, regardless of the outcomes.
For accountants, this might involve following the GAAP (Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles) or IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards),
even if doing so has short-term negative consequences for the company.

Virtue Ethics:
Virtue ethics focuses on the character of the decision-maker and emphasizes
virtues like integrity, honesty, and fairness. Ethical decisions are made by considering
what a virtuous person would do in a similar situation.

12.2. Case Study Analysis: Ethical Dilemmas in Accounting

Case 1: Falsifying Financial Statements

A senior accountant at a company is under pressure from management to
adjust financial statements to show more favorable results. The company is struggling
to meet its earnings targets, and the management believes that inflating the numbers
will help keep stock prices up and maintain investor confidence. The accountant is
conflicted, knowing that falsifying the financials violates ethical principles and legal
regulations.

Discussion Points:
• What ethical decision-making model would you apply in this situation?
• What are the potential consequences of falsifying the financial statements for
the company, its employees, and the public?
• How should the accountant handle the pressure from management while
adhering to ethical guidelines?

Case 2: Conflict of Interest in Auditing

An auditor is assigned to audit a company that is also a major client of the
auditing firm. The auditor’s firm has a long-standing relationship with the client, and
there is a conflict of interest, as the auditor’s firm stands to lose a large revenue stream
if they report unfavorable findings. The auditor is conflicted between the desire to
maintain a good relationship with the client and the ethical obligation to provide an
unbiased and truthful audit report.

Discussion Points:
• How does the conflict of interest affect the auditor’s ability to make an objective
and ethical decision?
• What ethical principles are at stake in this case?
• How can the auditor address the situation while maintaining professional
integrity and objectivity?

MRTA, 2025
80
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

12.3. Ethical Challenges and Stakeholder

Implications
When analyzing ethical challenges in accounting, it’s important to consider the
impact of decisions on different stakeholders, including:
• Shareholders and Investors: They rely on accurate financial reporting to
make informed decisions about their investments.
• Employees: Employees depend on the stability of the company, and unethical
financial reporting can undermine employee trust and morale.
• The Public: Accounting professionals play a role in ensuring that financial
reporting is transparent, which impacts public trust in the financial system.
• Regulatory Authorities: Accountants must ensure compliance with laws and
standards set by regulatory bodies such as the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) or International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB).

In both case studies, the implications of unethical behavior—such as falsifying

financial statements or ignoring conflicts of interest—could have severe
consequences for stakeholders, including legal ramifications, financial loss, and
reputational damage to the company.

12.4. Making Ethical Decisions: Short-Term vs. Long-Term Consequences

In ethical decision-making, accountants must weigh the short-term benefits of
unethical decisions (e.g., maintaining stock prices, securing contracts) against the
long-term consequences, which may include damage to reputation, legal penalties,
and loss of public trust. Adhering to ethical guidelines may result in short-term
setbacks, but it ensures long-term stability, trust, and credibility in the profession.

Conclusion

In conclusion, analyzing real-life case studies of ethical dilemmas in accounting

offers critical insights into the complexities of ethical decision-making within the
profession. By applying ethical decision-making models and evaluating the
implications of various choices on stakeholders, accountants can navigate challenging
situations more effectively. Integrating key ethical concepts and demonstrating a
commitment to making informed decisions will not only enhance individual
accountability but also contribute to fostering a culture of ethics within organizations.
Ultimately, upholding high ethical standards is essential for maintaining public trust in
financial reporting and ensuring the integrity of the accounting profession as a whole.

Ethical Decision-Making in Accounting Activity Overview:

In this activity, students will be provided with different real-world case studies
(similar to the ones discussed above) and will work in small groups to analyze the
ethical dilemmas. They will apply different ethical decision-making models
(utilitarianism, deontological ethics, virtue ethics) to propose ethical solutions and
recommend actions.

MRTA, 2025
81
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

Instructions:
1. Case Study Review: Each group will be assigned a case study.
2. Model Application: The group will identify the ethical issues, stakeholders
involved, and the potential consequences of the decision. They will then apply
one or more ethical decision-making models to propose a solution.
3. Presentation: Each group will present their analysis and ethical solution to the
class.
4. Discussion: The class will engage in a discussion about the proposed
solutions, considering alternative approaches and potential outcomes.

Rubric for Grading the Hands-On Activity

Needs
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Poor (1)
Improvement (2)
Clearly identifies and
Identification Identifies most Identifies basic Identifies some
thoroughly explains all Fails to identify
of Ethical ethical issues with ethical issues but issues but with
ethical issues involved ethical issues
Issues good explanation lacks depth minimal explanation
in the case
Effectively applies one
Applies ethical
or more ethical decision- Applies ethical Little application of No application of
Application of models with some
making models to models but with ethical models to ethical models to
Ethical Models analysis but lacks
propose a well- limited analysis the case the case
depth
reasoned solution
Proposes a clear, Proposes a
Proposes a Solution lacks clear No solution or
Solution practical, and well- reasonable solution
solution with basic ethical reasoning or irrelevant
Proposed supported solution with with adequate ethical
ethical reasoning is impractical proposal
ethical justification justification
Thoroughly evaluates
Evaluates the
the impact of the Evaluates the impact Limited or vague
impact with
Impact decision on but lacks detail or evaluation of No evaluation of
minimal
Evaluation stakeholders and analysis of all impact on impact provided
consideration of
organizational stakeholders stakeholders
stakeholders
outcomes
Clear, well-organized, Good presentation
Adequate Disorganized No presentation
and confident with clear
Clarity of presentation, but presentation with or poorly
presentation with full organization and
Presentation lacks clarity or full unclear communicated
participation from all some participation
participation communication ideas
group members from all members

Assessment

Multiple Choice Questions. Instructions: Choose the best answer for each of the
following questions.
1. Which ethical decision-making model focuses on the consequences of
actions and the greatest good for the greatest number?
a) Deontological ethics
b) Utilitarianism
c) Virtue ethics
d) Care ethics
2. Which of the following best describes deontological ethics in
accounting?
a) Decision-making based on the best outcome for all stakeholders
b) Decision-making based on moral duties and adherence to rules
c) Decision-making based on the personal virtues of the accountant
d) Decision-making based on emotional empathy

MRTA, 2025
82
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

3. What is the primary focus of virtue

ethics in ethical decision-making?
a) The legal consequences of actions
b) The greatest good for the greatest number of people
c) The moral character and virtues of the decision-maker
d) The financial impact of the decision
4. What is a potential consequence of falsifying financial statements in
accounting?
a) Increased stock prices in the short term
b) Legal penalties and loss of trust in the long term
c) Enhanced corporate reputation
d) Immediate financial gain for the company
5. Which ethical challenge arises when an auditor has a financial interest
in the company they are auditing?
a) Conflict of interest
b) Transparency
c) Accountability
d) Objectivity
6. In ethical decision-making, what should an accountant consider when
evaluating a decision’s impact on stakeholders?
a) Only the financial impact of the decision
b) How the decision aligns with the accountant's personal beliefs
c) Both short-term and long-term consequences for stakeholders
d) The preferences of the company’s senior management
7. What ethical principle is at stake when a company influences an
accountant to falsify financial records?
a) Integrity and objectivity
b) Utilitarianism
c) Confidentiality
d) Fairness
8. Which ethical theory emphasizes adherence to professional standards
and rules, regardless of the outcomes?
a) Deontological ethics
b) Utilitarianism
c) Virtue ethics
d) Care ethics
9. Which of the following actions would be considered a breach of ethical
conduct in financial reporting?
a) Reporting financial statements that reflect true financial health
b) Inflating revenue to meet performance targets
c) Following the appropriate auditing standards
d) Providing accurate and timely disclosures
10. Why is it important for accountants to consider long-term consequences
when making ethical decisions?
a) To avoid short-term losses
b) To ensure they can retire without legal issues
c) To maintain their professional integrity and public trust in the long run
d) To maximize immediate profits for the company

MRTA, 2025
83
A MODULE FOR ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING University of Rizal System

References

https://www.icaew.com/technical/audit-and-assurance/faculty-resources/audit-and-

beyond/audit-and-beyond-archive/audit-and-beyond-2022/october-2022/ethical-

dilemma-case-studies

https://www.cpajournal.com/2017/10/12/icymi-ethical-dilemmas-facing-cpas-three-

case-studies/

https://www.tx.cpa/docs/default-source/default-document-

library/acancasestudyone.pdf?sfvrsn=2

https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=acctuht

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ethical-challenges-accounting-5-case-studies-yuif

MRTA, 2025
84