Scribd
Upload
5 views

Annex 3 - Evaluating Group Speaking Challenge

The document outlines an evaluation framework for assessing group performance during a speaking challenge in an English course. It includes a scoring system from 0 to 5 to evaluate aspects such as communication, organization, contribution, collaboration, respect, and time management. The aim is to provide constructive feedback to enhance future group collaboration and speaking skills.

Uploaded by

janarcegalvandeavila2
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views

Annex 3 - Evaluating Group Speaking Challenge

The document outlines an evaluation framework for assessing group performance during a speaking challenge in an English course. It includes a scoring system from 0 to 5 to evaluate aspects such as communication, organization, contribution, collaboration, respect, and time management. The aim is to provide constructive feedback to enhance future group collaboration and speaking skills.

Uploaded by

janarcegalvandeavila2
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


Managing Unit: Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación
Program: Licenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglés
Course: English VI
Code: 518011

Annex 3 - Evaluating Group Speaking Challenge

Objective: Assess how well the group worked together to communicate and
collaborate effectively during the group speaking challenge.

Instructions

Please reflect on the group’s performance as a whole during the speaking


challenge. Use the 0–5 scale to evaluate the following aspects of the group’s
performance. Provide brief comments to support your evaluation.
Scoring System:
0 = Poor performance (Significant issues or lack of participation)
1 = Fair performance (Some improvement needed)
2 = Satisfactory performance (Meets basic expectations, but could be better)
3 = Good performance (Solid effort with a few areas for improvement)
4 = Very good performance (Effective collaboration, minor improvements
needed)
5 = Excellent performance (Flawless communication and collaboration)
1. Did the group communicate effectively during the debate?
(Score: 0-5)
Comment:
(Example: "The group communicated well, with everyone clearly
presenting their points. We could have improved by allowing each
person more time to elaborate.")

1
2. Was the group well-organized during the speaking challenge?
(Score: 0-5)
Comment:
(Example: "The group was mostly organized, but we could have
assigned specific roles beforehand to avoid confusion during the task.")
3. Did all group members contribute to the speaking challenge?
(Score: 0-5)
Comment:
(Example: "Most members actively participated, but a few members
did not speak as much. We should have encouraged quieter members
to join in more.")
4. Did the group collaborate effectively to prepare for the
challenge?
(Score: 0-5)
Comment:
(Example: "We met regularly to discuss points and assign roles, but
there were a few misunderstandings about who would speak on certain
topics.")
5. Was the communication respectful and supportive throughout
the process?
(Score: 0-5)
Comment:
(Example: "The group maintained respectful communication, even
when disagreements arose. We could have been more patient with
differing opinions.")
6. Did the group manage their time effectively during the
speaking challenge?
(Score: 0-5)
Comment:
(Example: "We managed time reasonably well, though some members

2
could have kept their points shorter to allow everyone more speaking
time.")

Overall Group Performance Evaluation

Average Score (Out of 5):


Example:
The group worked well together overall, scoring a 4. We communicated
effectively and supported each other, though there was room for
improvement in managing speaking time and encouraging quieter members.

This scoring system ensures that feedback is clear, constructive, and aimed
at improving group collaboration, speaking skills, and overall communication
in future tasks.

You might also like