Unit 1.

Overview of Software development methodology and software quality model,

different models of software development and their issues. Introduction to software
architecture, evolution of software architecture, software components and connectors,
common software architecture frameworks, Architecture business cycle –
architectural patterns – reference model.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Overview of Software Development Methodology:

Software development methodology is a framework that is used to structure, plan, and

control the process of developing an information system. This kind of development
methodologies are only concerned with the software development process, so it does
not involve any technical aspect of, but only concern with proper planning for the
software development.

There are Various Software development Methodology:

1. Waterfall Development Model:- The waterfall model is one of the most traditional
and commonly used software development methodologies for software
development. This life cycle model is often considered as the classic style of the
software development. This model clarifies the software development process in a
linear sequential flow that means that any phase in the development process
begins only if the earlier phase is completed. This development approach does not
define the process to go back to the previous phase to handle changes in
requirements.
Advantages of Waterfall Model:

1. Waterfall model is very simple and easy to understand and use a method that is why
development approach does not define the process to go back to the previous phase to
handle changes in requirements.

2. It is easy to manage, because of the rigidity of the model. Moreover, each phase has
specific deliverables and individual review process.

3. In this model phases are processed and completed are at once in a time thus it saves
a significant amount of time.

4. This type of development model works more effectively in the smaller projects
where requirements are very well understood.

5. The testing is easier as it can be done by reference to the scenarios defined in the
earlier functional specification.

Disadvantages of Waterfall Model:

1. This model can only be used when very precise up-front requirements are available.

2. This model is not applicable for maintenance type of projects.

3. The main drawback of this method is that once an application is in the testing stage,
it is not possible to go back and edit something.
4. There is no possibility to produce any working software until it reaches the last
stage of the cycle.

5. In this model, there is no option to know the end result of the entire project.

2. Agile Software Development

Agile Software Development is an approach that is used to design a disciplined

software management process which also allows some frequent alteration in the
development project. This is a type of software development methodologies which is
one conceptual framework for undertaking various software engineering projects. It is
used to minimize risk by developing software in short time boxes which are called
iterations that generally last for one week to one month.

Advantages of Agile Development Methodology:

1. Agile methodology has an adaptive approach which is able to respond to the
changing requirements of the clients.

2. Direct communication and constant feedback from customer representative leave

no space for any guesswork in the system.

Disadvantage of Agile Development Methodology:

1. This methodology focuses on working software rather than documentation, hence it

may result in a lack of documentation.

2. The software development project can get off track if the customer is not very clear
about the outcome of his project.

3. Extreme Programming: Extreme Programming is an agile software engineering

methodology. This methodology, which is shortly known as XP methodology is
mainly used for creating software within a very unstable environment. It allows
greater flexibility within the modelling process. The main goal of this XP model is to
lower the cost of software requirements. It is quite common in the XP model that the
cost of changing the requirements on later stage in the project can be very high.

Advantages of Extreme Programming:

1. It emphasis on customer involvement.

2. This model helps to establish rational plans and schedules and to get the developers
personally committed to their schedules which are surely a big advantage in the XP
model.

3. This model is consistent with most modern development methods so, developers
are able to produce quality software.

Disadvantages of Extreme Programming:

1. It requires meetings at frequent intervals at enormous expense to customers.

2. It requires too much development changes which are really very difficult to adopt
every time for the software developer.

3. It tends to impossible to be known exact estimates of work effort needed to provide

a quote, because at the starting of the project nobody aware about the entire scope and
requirements of the project

4. Scrum Development Methodology: The Scrum Development Methodology can be

applied to nearly any project. This process is suited for development projects that are
rapidly changing or highly emergent requirements. The Scrum software development
model begins with a brief planning, meeting and concludes with a final review. This
development methodology is used for speedy development of software which includes
a series of iterations to create required software. It is an ideal methodology because it
easily brings on track even the slowest progressing projects.

Advantages of Scrum Development:

1. In this methodology, decision-making is entirely in the hands of the teams.

2. This methodology enables projects where the business requirements documentation

is not considered very significant for the successful development.
3. It is a lightly controlled method which totally empathizes on frequent updating of
the progress, therefore, project development steps are visible in this method.

Disadvantages of Scrum Development:

1. This kind of development model is suffered if the estimating project costs and time
will not be accurate.

2. It is good for small, fast moving projects but not suitable for large size projects.

5. Lean Development Methodology: Lean Development Methodology focuses on the

creation of easily changeable software. This Software Development model is more
strategically focused than any other type of agile methodology. The goal of this
methodology is to develop software in one-third of the time, with very limited budget,
and very less amount of required workflow.

Advantages of Lean Development Methodology:

1. The early elimination of the overall efficiency of the development process certainly
helps to speeds up the process of entire software development which surely reduces
the cost of the project.

2. Delivering the product early is a definite advantage. It means that development

team can deliver more functionality in a shorter period of time, hence enabling more
projects to be delivered.

3. Empowerment of the development team helps in developing the decision-making

ability of the team members which created more motivation among team members.

Disadvantages of Lean Development Methodology:

1. Success in the software development depends on how disciplined the team
members are and how to advance their technical skills.

2. The role of a business analyst is vital to ensure the business requirements

documentation is understood properly. If any organization doesn’t have a person with
the right business analyst, then this method may not be useful for them.

3. In this development model, great flexibility is given to developer, which is surely

great, but too much of it will quickly lead to a development team who lost focus on its
original objectives thus, it hearts the flow of entire project development work.

6. Rapid Application Development Methodology: Rapid Application Development

(RAD) is an effective methodology to provide much quicker development and higher-
quality results than those achieved with the other software development
methodologies. It is designed in such a way that, it easily take the maximum
advantages of the software development. The main objective of this methodology is to
accelerate the entire software development process. The goal is easily achievable
because it allows active user participation in the development process.

Advantages of the RAD model:

1. Rapid Application development model helps to reduce the risk and required efforts
on the part of the software developer.

2. This model also helps clients to take quick reviews for the project.

3. This methodology encourages customer feedback which always provides

improvement scope for any software development project.

Disadvantages RAD model:

1. This model depends on the strong team and individual performances for clearly
identifying the exact requirement of the business.
2. This approach demands highly skilled developers and designer’s team which may
not be possible for every organization.

3. This method is not applicable for the developer to use in small budget projects as a
cost of modelling and automated code generation is very high.

7. Dynamic Systems Development Model Methodology: Dynamic Systems

Development Model is a software development methodology originally based on the
Rapid Application Development methodology. This is an iterative and incremental
approach that emphasizes continuous user involvement. Its main aim is to deliver
software systems on time and on the budget. This model simply works on the
philosophy that nothing is developed perfectly in the first attempt and considers as an
ever-changing process

Advantages of Dynamic Systems Development Model:

1. Users are highly involved in the development of the system so, they are more likely
to get a grip on the software development project.

2. In this model, basic functionality is delivered quickly, with more functionality

being delivered at frequent intervals.

Disadvantages of Dynamic Systems Development Model:

1. The first thing is DSDM is costly to implement, as it requires users and developers
both to be trained to employ it effectively. It may not be suitable for small
organizations or one-time projects.

2. It is a relatively new model, therefore, it is not very common and easy to

understand.

Software Quality Model

Software Quality Models are a standardised way of measuring a software product.

With the increasing trend in software industry, new applications are planned and
developed every day. This eventually gives rise to the need for reassuring that the
product so built meets at least the expected standards.

Following are few models that explains what kind of quality criteria is to be followed.

Mc Call's Model –It is the first quality model developed, which defines a layout of the
various aspects that define the product's quality. It defines the product quality in the
following manner – Product Revision, Product Operation, Product Transition. Product
revision deals with maintainability, flexibility and testability, product operation is
about correctness, reliability, efficiency and integrity.
(i) Product Revision - The product revision perspective identifies quality factors that
influence the ability to change the software product, these factors are:-(a)
Maintainability

- The ability to find and fix a defect. (b) Flexibility - The ability to make changes
required as dictated by the business. (c) Testability- The ability to Validate the
software requirements.

(ii) Product Transition -The product transition perspective identifies quality factors
that influence the ability to adapt the software to new environments: - (a) Portability -
The ability to transfer the software from one environment to another. (b) Reusability -
The ease of using existing software components in a different context. (c)
Interoperability - The extent, or ease, to which software components work together.

(iii) Product Operations - The product operations perspective identifies quality factors
that influence the extent to which the software fulfils its specification -(a)Correctness
- The functionality matches the specification.(b)Reliability - The extent to which the
system fails.(c) Efficiency - System resource (including CPU, disk, memory, network)
usage.(d) Integrity - Protection from unauthorized access.(e) Usability -ease of use.

2. Boehm Model -

It describes how easily and reliably a software product can be used. This model
actually elaborates the aspects of McCall model in detail. It begins with the
characteristics that resorts to higher level requirements. The model's general utility is
divided into various factors - portability, efficiency and human engineering, which are
the refinement of factors like portability and utility. Further maintainability is refined
into testability, understand ability and modifiability.
2. Iteration Model-
An iterative life cycle model does not start with a full specification of requirements. In
this model, the development begins by specifying and implementing just part of the
software, which is then reviewed in order to identify further requirements. Each
release of Iterative Model is developed in a specific and fixed time period, which is
called iteration. Furthermore, this iteration focuses on a certain set of requirements.
Each cycle ends with a usable system i.e., a particular iteration results in an
executable release

Issues

• More resources may be required, and more management attention is required.

• Although cost of change is lesser, but it is not very suitable for changing
requirements.

• It is not suitable for smaller projects, and highly skilled resources are required for
skill analysis.

• Project progress is highly dependent upon the risk analysis phase.

• Defining increments may require definition of the complete system.

3. V-Shaped Model-
V-Model is an SDLC model that has a testing phase corresponding to every
development stage in the waterfall model. It is pronounced as the "vee" model. The V-
model is an extension of the waterfall model. V model Testing is done in parallel to
development. It is also called a Validation and Verification Model.

Issues

• Very rigid and least flexible.

• Software is developed during the implementation phase, so no early prototypes of

the software are produced.

• If any changes happen in midway, then the test documents along with requirement
documents has to be updates.

4. Rapid Application Development Methodology: Rapid Application Development

(RAD) is an effective methodology to provide much quicker development and higher-
quality results than those achieved with the other software development
methodologies. It is designed in such a way that, it easily takes the maximum
advantages of the software development. The main objective of this methodology is to
accelerate the entire software development process. The goal is easily achievable
because it allows active user participation in the development process.

Issues
• This model depends on the strong team and individual performances for clearly
identifying the exact requirement of the business.

• It only works on systems that can be modularized can be built using this
methodology.

• This approach demands highly skilled developers and designer’s team which may
not be possible for every organization.

• This method is not applicable for the developer to use in small budget projects as a
cost of modelling and automated code generation is very high.

5. Spiral Model- Spiral Model is a combination of a waterfall model and iterative

model. Each phase in spiral model begins with a design goal and ends with the client
reviewing the progress. The spiral model was first mentioned by Barry Boehm in his
1986 paper. The development team in Spiral-SDLC model starts with a small set of
requirement and goes through each development phase for those set of requirements.
The software engineering team adds functionality for the additional requirement in
every-increasing spirals until the application is ready for the production phase.

Issues

• Can be a costly model to use.

• Risk analysis requires highly specific expertise.

• Project’s success is highly dependent on the risk analysis phase.

• Doesn’t work well for smaller projects.

Software Architecture-

“The software architecture of a program or computing system is the structure or

structures of the system, which comprise- Software components, The externally
visible properties of those components, The relationships among them. "The structure
of the components of a program/system, their interrelationships, and principles and
guidelines governing their design and evolution over time.” It encompasses the set of
significant decisions about the organization of a software system.

• Selection of the structural elements and their interfaces by which a system is

ccomposed.

• Behaviour as specified in collaborations among those impelement.

There are fundamentally three reasons for software architecture’s importance from a
technical perspective.

• Communication among stakeholders

• Early design decisions

• Transferable abstraction of a system.

Evolution of Software Architecture Software architecture has been an evolutionary discipline

starting with monolithic mainframes to recent micro services.

The mainframe era was of expensive hardware, having powerful server capable of processing
large amount instructions and client connecting to it via dumb terminals. This evolved as
hardware became cheaper and dumb terminals paved way to smart terminals. These smart
terminals had reasonable processing power leading to a client server models. There are many
variations of client server models around how much processing a client should do versus the
server. For instance, client could all the processing having server just act as centralized data
repository. The primary challenge with that approach was maintenance and pushing client-side
updates to all the users. This led to using browser clients where the UI is essentially rendered
from server in response to a HTTP request from browser. As server started having multiple
responsibilities in this new world like serving UI, processing transactions, storing data and
others, architects broke the complexity by grouping these responsibilities into logical layers – UI
Layer, Business Layer, Data Layer, etc. Specific products emerged to support these layers like
Web Servers, Database servers, etc. Depending on the complexity these layers were physically
separated into tier. The word tier indicates a physical separation where Web Server, Database
server and business processing components run on their own machines. Software Component
and Connectors Component - A Component is a unit of behaviour. Its description defines what
the component can do and what it requires to do that job. Connector - A Connector is an
indication that there is a mechanism that relates one component to another usually through
relationships such as data flow or control flow. Changing the grouping of behaviours in
components or changing which components are connected changes the value of certain quality
attributes. Component-and-connector structures help answer questions such as-

• What are the major executing components and how do they interact?

• What are the major shared data stores?

• Which parts of the system are replicated? How does data progress through the system?
• What parts of the system can run in parallel?

• How can the system's structure change as it executes?

Process, or communicating processes - Like all component-and-connector structures, this one is

orthogonal to the module-based structures and deals with the dynamic aspects of a running
system. The units here are processes or threads that are connected with each other by
communication, synchronization, and/or exclusion operations. The relation in this (and in all
component-and-connector structures) is attachment, showing how the components and
connectors are hooked together. The process structure is important in helping to engineer a
system's execution performance and availability. Concurrency - This component-and-connector
structure allows the architect to determine opportunities for parallelism and the locations where
resource contention may occur. The units are components and the connectors are "logical
threads." A logical thread is a sequence of computation that can be allocated to a separate
physical thread later in the design process. The concurrency structure is used early in design to
identify the requirements for managing the issues associated with concurrent execution. Shared
data, or repository - This structure comprises components and connectors that create, store, and
access persistent data. If the system is in fact structured around one or more shared data
repositories, this structure is a good one to illuminate. It shows how data is produced and
consumed by runtime software elements, and it can be used to ensure good performance and data
integrity. Client-server - If the system is built as a group of cooperating clients and servers, this
is a good componentand-connector structure to illuminate. The components are the clients and
servers, and the connectors are protocols and messages they share to carry out the system's work.
This is useful for separation of concerns (supporting modifiability), for physical distribution, and
for load balancing (supporting runtime performance).

Common Software Architecture Framework-

The software needs the architectural design to represent the design of software. IEEE defines
architectural design as “the process of defining a collection of hardware and software
components and their interfaces to establish the framework for the development of a computer
system.” The software that is built for computer-based systems can exhibit one of these many
architectural styles. Each style will describe a system category that consists of: • A set of
components (e.g.: a database, computational modules) that will perform a function required by
the system. • The set of connectors will help in coordination, communication, and cooperation
between the components. • Conditions that how components can be integrated to form the
system.

1. Layered Architecture: This pattern can be used to structure programs that can be
decomposed into groups of subtasks, each of which is at a particular level of abstraction.
Each layer provides services to the next higher layer. The most commonly found 4
layers of a general information system are as follows.
• Presentation layer (also known as UI layer)

• Application layer (also known as service layer)

• Business logic layer (also known as domain layer)

• Data access layer (also known as persistence layer)

Usage

1. General Desktop application.

2. E- commerce application

2. Client Server Architecture –

This pattern consists of two parties; a server and multiple clients. The server component will
provide services to multiple client components. Clients request services from the server and
the server provides relevant services to those clients. Furthermore, the server continues to
listen to client requests.

Usage
1. Online applications such as email, document sharing and banking.

Architecture Business Cycle (ABC)

What is the Architecture Business Cycle?
The model of the Architecture Business Cycle (ABC) is based totally on the idea that
“software program architecture is the end result of technical, business and social impacts“. The
ensuing structure “in turn affects the technical, commercial enterprise and social environments“.
The key factors of the cycle are the forces influencing the architecture, the necessities that end
result from these forces, the architect and his experience, the architecture, and the device (or
structures in a product line architecture). The architecture enterprise cycle also suggests how
those key elements have an effect on every different, visible in under parent.

Architecture Business Cycle (ABC)

In a later document, the originators clarified the reason; “the architecture business cycle become
predicted as a way to depict the influences on a software program architect and to show how architectures
can eventually affect the very matters that at the start fashioned them”.
The influences of the authentic cycle were up to date through the authentic authors and are sooner or
later referred to as forces. This look is based totally on the ultra-modern of those up to date structure
business cycles, because the seven categories of forces, visible in the above parent, shaping the
structure turned simpler to narrate to the interview responses.
The most important idea of the cycle, that the structure provides comments in turn affecting one or more
of the authentic affects or forces, have remained equal through all evolutions of the architecture
enterprise cycle. The cycle is regularly used as a theoretical framework, but it is tough to find empirical
studies regarding the real stakeholders and now not simplest as a commentary of an architecture
enterprise cycle from a distance.
Working of Architecture Business Cycle
A business can manage a cycle with feedback loops formed by relationships between business goals,
product needs, architect experience, architectures, and fielded systems. A company controls this cycle
to accommodate expansion, enlarge its enterprise region, and capitalize on prior system and architectural
development efforts.
The below figure shows the feedback loops. Some of the feedback comes from the architecture itself,
and some comes from the system built from it.

Working of Architecture Business Cycle (ABC)

The architecture affects the shape of the developing organization. A structure prescribes a structure for
a machine it specifically prescribes the gadgets of software programs that must be implemented and
included to form the gadget. Teams are shaped for character software program gadgets; and the
development, check, and integration activities around the devices. Likewise, schedules and budgets
allocate resources in chunks similar to the devices. Teams end up embedded inside the company’s
structure. These is remarks from the architecture to the developing employer.
The architecture can affect the desires of the growing agency. A success system constructed from it may
allow a company to establish a foothold in a specific market area. The structure can offer opportunities
for the green manufacturing and deployment of similar systems, and the employer may additionally adjust
its dreams to take advantage of its newfound knowledge to plumb the marketplace. These is remarks
from the machine to the developing employer and the structures it builds.
The structure can have an effect on the purchaser necessities for the subsequent device by giving the
customer the opportunity to acquire a system in a extra reliable, timely, and low-cost manner than if the
subsequent machine were to be built from scratch.
The manner of device building will affect the architect’s enjoyment with next systems by adding to the
company’s enjoy base.
A few systems will influence and trade the software program engineering tradition. I.E., the technical
surroundings wherein machine developers perform and analyze.
Software Process and Architecture Business Cycle (ABC)
Software process is the term given to the organization, ritualization, and management of software
development activities.
The various activities involved in creating software architecture are:
I. Creating the Business Case for the System –
1. It is a vital step in growing and constraining any destiny necessities.
2. How a good deal to the product cost?
3. What is its centered marketplace?
4. What is its focused time to market?
5. Will it want to interface with different structures?
6. Are there gadget barriers that it must work within?
7. These are all the questions that must contain the device’s architects.
8. They can not be decided entirely by an architect, however, if an architect is not consulted during
the advent of the enterprise case, it could be not possible to acquire the commercial enterprise
desires.
II. Understanding the Requirements –
1. There are a lot of strategies for eliciting requirements from the stakeholders. For instance, object-
oriented analysis uses scenarios, or “use instances” to embody necessities. Safety-essential
systems use extra rigorous approaches such as finite-nation-device fashions or formal specification
languages.
2. Another technique that facilitates us to recognize requirements is the creation of prototypes.
3. Regardless of the technique used to elicit the requirements, the favored features of the device to be
built determine the form of its shape.
III. Creating or Selecting the Architecture –
In the landmark book Mythical Man-Month, Fred Brooks argues forcefully and eloquently that conceptual
integrity is the important thing to sound system design and that conceptual integrity can most effectively
be had by way of a small variety of minds coming collectively to design the gadget’s structure.
IV. Documenting and Communicating the Architecture –
1. For the structure to be effective as the spine of the assignment’s layout, it needs to be
communicated certainly and unambiguously to all the stakeholders.
2. Developers have to recognize the work assignments it calls for of them, testers need to recognize
the undertaking structure it imposes on them, control must understand the scheduling implications
it indicates, and so forth.
V. Analyzing or Evaluating the Architecture –
1. Choosing amongst a couple of competing designs rationally is one of the architect’s greatest
challenges.
2. Evaluating a structure for the characteristics that it helps is vital to ensuring that the system made
out of that structure satisfies its stakeholder’s needs.
3. Use state of affairs-primarily based techniques or structure tradeoff evaluation method (ATAM) or
price advantage evaluation method (CBAM).
VI. Implementing the System based on the Architecture –
1. This pastime is involved with retaining the builders devoted to the systems and interplay protocols
restrained through the architecture.
2. Having an express and well-communicated structure is the first step towards making sure of
architectural conformance.
VII. Ensuring that the Implementation Conforms to the Architecture –
1. Finally, while a structure is created and used, it goes into a protection phase.
2. Constant vigilance is needed to make certain that the actual architecture and its representation
continue to be each different all through this segment.

Unit 2

Software architecture models: -

In software architecture, different models are used to describe various aspects of a system. These
models help architects and developers visualize, design, and communicate the structure and
behavior of a system. Below are the main types of software architecture models you mentioned:

1. Structural Models

Structural models describe the static structure of a system. They focus on the organization of
components, their relationships, and how they fit together. Structural models are essential for
understanding the system’s architecture at a high level.
Key components:

 Modules or Components: Represent different parts of the system, like classes, libraries,
services, or subsystems.
 Relationships: How components interact or depend on each other. This could be through
function calls, data sharing, or message passing.
 Decomposition: Breaking down the system into smaller, more manageable parts.

Examples:

 Layered Architecture: The system is divided into layers, each with a specific role (e.g.,
presentation layer, business logic layer, data access layer).
 Component Diagram: A UML (Unified Modeling Language) diagram that shows the components
and their interdependencies.

2. Framework Models

Framework models describe generic solutions or "blueprints" that provide reusable structures
for developing software applications. A framework often consists of predefined classes or
services that allow developers to extend and customize them.
Key components:

 Reusable Components: Predefined components that can be customized and extended.

 Inversion of Control (IoC): The framework controls the flow of execution, unlike traditional
programming where the developer writes the main program flow.
 Extensibility: Frameworks are designed to be extended or customized with user-defined logic.

Examples:

 MVC (Model-View-Controller): A framework pattern for structuring applications with clear

separation between the data (Model), the user interface (View), and the control flow
(Controller).
 Microservices Framework: A framework supporting the development of microservices-based
applications, such as Spring Boot or Flask.

3. Dynamic Models

Dynamic models describe the behavior of the system over time. They focus on how components
interact during runtime, showing the flow of data and control between components.
Key components:

 Interactions: Describes how components communicate with each other dynamically, often
represented by sequence diagrams or collaboration diagrams.
 State Transitions: The possible states a component can be in and how it transitions between
these states (e.g., finite state machines).
 Concurrency and Threading: Shows how different threads or processes interact, including
synchronization and communication patterns.

Examples:

 State Machine Diagrams: Depicts states of a system or component and the transitions between
states triggered by events.
 Sequence Diagrams: Shows the order of interactions between objects or components over time.
 Activity Diagrams: Represent workflows of stepwise activities, showing how different actions
occur based on decisions, events, or other activities.

4. Process Models

Process models describe the execution flow or development process of a system, focusing on
how the system's tasks or activities are executed, orchestrated, and monitored. These models can
be used to represent the system’s operational lifecycle or the development process lifecycle.
Key components:

 Processes or Tasks: A collection of activities that achieve specific objectives (e.g., request
handling, data processing).
 Control Flow: Describes how processes or activities are coordinated and sequenced.
 Concurrency: Handles simultaneous execution of tasks or processes, and the synchronization
between them.

Examples:

 Workflow Diagrams: Show how different tasks in the system are related and flow from one to
another.
 Use Case Diagrams: Represent the functional requirements of the system, showing interactions
between actors and the system.
 Business Process Models: BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) diagrams, which focus
on the processes in a business system and how they interconnect.

Architectures styles: -

In software architecture, architectural styles (or patterns) represent common approaches to

structuring systems. These styles provide a template for organizing components and defining
their interactions in a way that promotes modularity, scalability, maintainability, and other
quality attributes. The choice of architectural style has a significant impact on the overall design
and performance of the system.

Here are some of the most widely recognized software architectural styles:
1. Dataflow Architecture

Dataflow architecture organizes the system as a network of processing nodes where data flows
through the system from one processing unit (node) to the next. Each node performs a specific
transformation on the data, and the output from one node becomes the input for the next.

Key Concepts:

 Data-driven: The system is driven by the movement and transformation of data.

 Modularity: Each processing step (node) is independent and can be modified or replaced
without affecting the rest of the system.
 Parallelism: Dataflow systems can often be parallelized since each node operates independently
on the data.

Example:

 Real-Time Signal Processing: A system that processes audio or video data, applying different
filters or transformations (e.g., noise reduction, compression).
 ETL Pipelines: Extract, transform, and load data from multiple sources into a data warehouse.

Use Cases:

 Data processing applications, real-time analytics, scientific computing, and multimedia systems.
2. Pipes and Filters Architecture

Pipes and Filters is an architectural style where data flows through a sequence of independent,
modular components called filters, which process the data in some way. The components are
connected through pipes that carry data between them.

Key Concepts:

 Filters: Independent modules that perform a specific transformation or operation on the data.
 Pipes: Communication channels that transport data between filters.
 Modularity: Each filter is loosely coupled, making it easy to modify or replace individual
components.

Example:

 Unix Shell Pipeline: A sequence of commands (filters) connected via pipes to perform data
manipulation (e.g., grep | sort | uniq).
 Data Processing Pipelines: Image processing systems that apply filters in sequence (e.g., resize,
blur, sharpen).

Use Cases:

 Data processing systems, image manipulation, ETL workflows, streaming data pipelines.
3. Call-and-Return Architecture

In call-and-return architecture, systems are structured around a series of function calls and
returns. A caller (client) invokes a function or procedure, which is executed by a callee (server).
This is the most common form of procedural programming.

Key Concepts:

 Caller and Callee: The client calls the function, and the callee executes it and returns control
and/or data.
 Tightly Coupled: Components are often directly dependent on each other via method calls.
 Synchronous: Typically, the caller waits for the callee to return before continuing.

Example:

 Remote Procedure Call (RPC): A client application makes a procedure call to a remote server
application (e.g., in distributed systems).
 Function Calls in Programs: Standard procedural or object-oriented applications where methods
are called within the program.

Use Cases:

 Traditional desktop applications, service-based applications, API calls, and distributed systems
(e.g., RPC, SOAP, gRPC).

4. Data-Centered Architecture

Data-Centered Architecture organizes the system around a central data repository (often a
database) that serves as the hub for all interactions. Components in the system communicate by
reading from and writing to this central repository.
Key Concepts:

 Central Data Repository: The data center holds all shared data, and components interact with it.
 Data Sharing: Components or services communicate indirectly by manipulating the data stored
in the central repository.
 Consistency and Integrity: Centralized control ensures the consistency and integrity of data.

Example:

 Database-Centric Systems: Applications that rely on a central database for user data,
transactions, etc. (e.g., banking systems, CRM).
 Content Management Systems: Centralized repositories where documents or media are stored
and retrieved by different clients.

Use Cases:

 Applications that require centralized data storage and consistency, such as content
management, enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, and database-backed applications.

5. Layered Architecture

Layered Architecture divides a system into discrete layers, each of which has a specific
responsibility. Typically, layers are arranged in a hierarchy, and each layer communicates only
with the layer directly beneath it.
Key Concepts:

 Separation of Concerns: Each layer has a specific function (e.g., presentation, business logic,
data access).
 Modularity: Layers are often independently replaceable, allowing for easier maintenance and
updates.
 Abstraction: Layers abstract the underlying complexity of the system and reduce dependencies
between them.

Example:

 3-Tier Architecture: A common layered architecture with presentation, business, and data
layers.
 Web Application: A typical web application with distinct UI (presentation layer), service
(business layer), and database (data layer).

Use Cases:

 Enterprise applications, web applications, multi-tiered applications that require clear separation
between UI, logic, and data.

6. Agent-Based Architecture

In Agent-Based Architecture, the system is composed of independent agents that act

autonomously, communicate with each other, and interact with their environment. Agents are
often modeled to simulate real-world processes, like in multi-agent systems (MAS).
Key Concepts:

 Autonomy: Agents operate independently with their own goals, behaviors, and knowledge.
 Communication: Agents interact through communication protocols, usually in a distributed way.
 Adaptability: Agents can adapt to changes in the environment or the system.

Example:

 Autonomous Vehicles: Agents (e.g., sensors, decision-making components) work together to

control a vehicle's movement and avoid obstacles.
 E-commerce Systems: Agents might be used for personalized recommendations, pricing
optimization, or managing inventory in real-time.

Use Cases:

 AI-based systems, robotics, simulations, multi-agent systems, and systems requiring complex
coordination and autonomy.

7. Microservices Architecture

Microservices Architecture decomposes a system into small, independent services that each
perform a single function and can be independently developed, deployed, and scaled.
Microservices communicate over lightweight protocols, usually HTTP/REST or messaging
queues.
Key Concepts:

 Independent Services: Each service has its own functionality and is independently deployable
and scalable.
 Loose Coupling: Services interact via APIs and are decoupled from one another, allowing for
easier maintenance and scalability.
 Fault Isolation: Failure in one service does not directly affect others.

Example:

 E-Commerce System: Separate microservices for user authentication, payment processing,

product catalog, and inventory management.
 Social Media Platform: Independent services for user profiles, messaging, notifications, and
news feeds.

Use Cases:

 Large-scale web applications, cloud-native applications, systems requiring scalability and agility,
and CI/CD-driven environments.

8. Reactive Architecture

Reactive Architecture is designed to build responsive, resilient, elastic, and message-driven

systems. The system responds to changes in its environment, and it is particularly suited for
systems that need to handle high loads or real-time interactions.
Key Concepts:

 Asynchronous Communication: Reactive systems use non-blocking, asynchronous messaging to

handle events and responses.
 Event-Driven: The system reacts to events, often triggering state changes or actions in response
to external or internal stimuli.
 Resilience and Scalability: Designed to handle high loads, recover from failures, and scale as
needed.

Example:

 Streaming Platforms: Systems like Netflix or Spotify that handle real-time streaming and
adaptive content delivery.
 IoT Systems: Systems managing large amounts of sensor data, where the system must react to
real-time data.

Use Cases:

 Real-time applications, IoT systems, systems that need high availability and fault tolerance (e.g.,
messaging platforms, monitoring systems).

9. Representational State Transfer (REST)

REST (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style that uses a stateless, client-
server model to enable scalable, simple interactions between distributed systems over HTTP. It
uses standard HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) and focuses on the representation of
resources.

Key Concepts:

 Resources: Each resource (e.g., a user, a product) is identified by a URL and is manipulated
through standard HTTP methods.
 Stateless: Each request is independent and contains all necessary information (no session state
is stored on the server).
 Uniform Interface: A consistent way to interact with resources (e.g., using RESTful endpoints).

Example:

 Web APIs: RESTful APIs, such as those used by social media platforms (e.g., Twitter API, GitHub
API).
 E-commerce Platform: REST APIs for managing user accounts, orders, products, etc.

Use Cases:

 Web services, mobile applications, integrations between systems (e.g., microservices, cloud
services).
Unit- 3

Software Architecture Implementation Technologies:

1. Software Architecture Description Languages (ADLs)

Software Architecture Description Languages (ADLs) are specialized languages used to

represent and describe software architectures in a formal and standardized way. ADLs help in
modeling the components, connectors, and interactions of a software system. They provide a
blueprint for the design and implementation of complex systems.

Key Features of ADLs:

 Formal Representation: ADLs offer a precise and formal way to define software architecture.
 Component Modeling: They model software components and their relationships, including both
static (e.g., modules) and dynamic (e.g., communication) aspects.
 Architecture Analysis: ADLs enable the analysis of architecture properties such as performance,
scalability, and reliability.

Popular ADLs:

 Acme: A language for defining software architectures, particularly focused on structure and
configurations of components.
 UniCon: A coordination language that focuses on defining how components interact and
communicate.
 Aesop: A tool for describing architectural patterns in a modular way.

Use Cases:

 Large-scale software systems.

 Systems requiring complex architectural descriptions for maintenance and evolution.

2. Frameworks and Technologies for Implementing Software Architectures

a. Struts

 Struts is an open-source framework for building Java web applications. It provides a Model-
View-Controller (MVC) architecture, which separates business logic, presentation, and
navigation.
Key Features:

 MVC Architecture: Separates concerns, improving maintainability and scalability.

 Tag Libraries: Simplifies UI development with reusable JSP tags.
 Action Mapping: Maps user requests to appropriate actions.

Use Cases:

 Java-based web applications that require a structured framework for handling requests and
responses.

b. Hibernate

 Hibernate is an object-relational mapping (ORM) framework for Java. It simplifies database

interaction by mapping Java objects to relational database tables.

Key Features:

 Object-Relational Mapping: Converts Java objects to database records and vice versa.
 Database Independence: Hibernate allows for database-agnostic programming.
 Caching: Built-in caching mechanisms for performance improvement.
 Lazy Loading: Supports lazy loading of data to enhance performance.

Use Cases:

 Java applications needing efficient database handling with minimal boilerplate code.

c. Node.js

 Node.js is a JavaScript runtime built on Chrome's V8 engine that allows developers to build
scalable network applications.

Key Features:

 Event-Driven, Non-Blocking I/O: Ideal for building real-time applications with high concurrency.
 Single Threaded: Handles many connections concurrently without the overhead of traditional
multi-threaded environments.
 npm (Node Package Manager): Access to a vast ecosystem of open-source packages.

Use Cases:

 Real-time web applications, microservices, APIs, and single-page applications (SPAs).

d. AngularJS

 AngularJS is a front-end web application framework developed by Google. It extends HTML with
new attributes, simplifying the development of single-page applications.

Key Features:

 Two-Way Data Binding: Automatically synchronizes the model and the view.
 Directives: Extend HTML with custom elements or attributes for building complex UIs.
 Dependency Injection: Makes components more modular and testable.

Use Cases:

 Building dynamic, single-page web applications (SPAs).

 Developing interactive user interfaces.

e. J2EE (Java 2 Enterprise Edition)

 J2EE is a set of Java APIs that provide a platform for building enterprise applications, with
components like servlets, JSP, and Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB).

Key Components:

 JSP (Java Server Pages): Allows for embedding Java code into HTML to generate dynamic
content on the server side.
 Servlets: Java classes that handle HTTP requests and generate responses.
 EJB (Enterprise JavaBeans): Server-side components that encapsulate business logic.

Use Cases:

 Large-scale, enterprise-level Java applications requiring web-based interaction and complex

business logic handling.

3. Middleware Technologies

Middleware is software that sits between an operating system and the applications that run on it,
facilitating communication and data management.
a. JDBC (Java Database Connectivity)

 JDBC provides an API for connecting Java applications to relational databases. It allows for
executing SQL queries and updates directly from Java code.

Key Features:

 Database Interaction: Provides methods for querying and updating databases.

 Connection Pooling: Supports managing a pool of database connections for efficient resource
use.

Use Cases:

 Any Java-based application that interacts with a relational database.

b. JNDI (Java Naming and Directory Interface)

 JNDI is an API that allows Java applications to find and look up objects, such as databases,
directory services, and enterprise beans.

Key Features:

 Resource Lookup: Helps applications look up and access resources like databases and messaging
queues.
 Integration with LDAP: Allows directory services integration.

Use Cases:

 Enterprise applications requiring directory services or resource lookups.

c. JMS (Java Message Service)

 JMS is an API that allows Java applications to send and receive messages via message queues
and topics.

Key Features:

 Asynchronous Communication: Facilitates loose coupling between system components.

 Queue and Topic-based Messaging: Allows for point-to-point and publish/subscribe
communication.
Use Cases:

 Enterprise systems requiring reliable, asynchronous messaging (e.g., order processing systems,
financial applications).

d. RMI (Remote Method Invocation)

 RMI is a Java API that enables objects in different Java Virtual Machines (JVMs) to communicate
with each other over a network.

Key Features:

 Remote Communication: Allows invoking methods on remote objects as if they were local.
 Distributed Systems: Facilitates the creation of distributed Java applications.

Use Cases:

 Distributed Java applications that require remote object communication.

e. CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture)

 CORBA is a standard defined by the Object Management Group (OMG) that enables
communication between objects in distributed systems, regardless of the programming
language.

Key Features:

 Language Agnostic: Allows interoperability between different programming languages.

 Object Communication: Facilitates method calls between objects in different processes or
machines.

Use Cases:

 Large-scale, cross-platform enterprise applications needing interoperability between different

systems.

4. Role of UML (Unified Modeling Language) in Software Architecture

UML (Unified Modeling Language) is a standardized modeling language used to visualize,

specify, construct, and document the artifacts of a software system. UML plays a crucial role in
representing software architecture by providing a common language for developers, architects,
and stakeholders.

Key Roles of UML:

 Visualizing Architecture: Helps in visually depicting the architecture of a system using various
UML diagrams (e.g., component diagrams, deployment diagrams, class diagrams).
 Communication: Facilitates communication among team members and stakeholders by offering
a shared understanding of the system’s design.
 Documenting the System: Provides clear documentation for future reference, maintenance, and
updates.
 Designing Systems: Assists in designing and structuring complex software systems before coding
begins.

Types of UML Diagrams for Software Architecture:

1. Component Diagram: Shows the software components and their relationships.

2. Class Diagram: Represents the static structure of the system, focusing on classes and their
relationships.
3. Deployment Diagram: Illustrates the physical deployment of components across machines and
nodes in a network.
4. Sequence Diagram: Describes how objects communicate with each other, in sequence, to
achieve a goal.
5. Use Case Diagram: Represents the functionality of the system from the perspective of the users
(actors).

Use Cases:

 Designing enterprise applications.

 Documenting the architecture of large, complex systems.
 Communicating system design to non-technical stakeholders.

Summary

 ADLs provide a formal approach to describing and analyzing software architecture.

 Frameworks and Technologies like Struts, Hibernate, Node.js, AngularJS, and J2EE (JSP, Servlets,
EJBs) offer tools for implementing various architectural patterns.
 Middleware technologies like JDBC, JNDI, JMS, RMI, and CORBA facilitate communication,
resource management, and integration between components and systems.
 UML plays a critical role in visualizing, specifying, and documenting software architectures,
ensuring effective communication and design alignment across teams.

These technologies and tools play a fundamental role in building scalable, maintainable, and
performant systems, aligned with the specific needs of the software architecture style being
implemented.
Unit 4
oftware Architecture Analysis and Design:-

Software architecture analysis and design are essential phases in the software development life
cycle (SDLC) that focus on defining the high-level structure of a system. These phases help
ensure the system meets both technical and business requirements, is scalable, and is
maintainable over time. Below are key concepts, techniques, and methods used in software
architecture analysis and design.

1. Software Architecture Analysis

Software Architecture Analysis involves evaluating the architecture to ensure that it will meet
the system's functional and non-functional requirements, such as performance, security, and
scalability. The goal is to identify potential risks, weaknesses, and trade-offs before
implementation begins.

Key Aspects of Architecture Analysis:

 Requirements Validation: Ensure that both functional and non-functional requirements (e.g.,
performance, security, availability) are adequately addressed by the architecture.
 Architecture Evaluation: Evaluate the architecture using quality attributes, such as
performance, security, modifiability, and scalability. Tools like ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff
Analysis Method) and SAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method) are used to assess these
factors.
 Risk Identification: Identify risks related to architectural decisions (e.g., reliance on third-party
tools, performance bottlenecks, tight coupling).
 Design Patterns and Principles: Ensure the chosen architectural patterns (e.g., layered,
microservices, client-server) are the best fit for the system's needs and conform to established
best practices and principles like SOLID, DRY, and KISS.

Techniques for Architecture Analysis:

1. Architecture Review:
o A formal process where the architecture is reviewed by experts to identify potential
problems.
o Reviews focus on how well the architecture meets requirements, how flexible it is, and
how scalable it is.
2. Scenario-based Evaluation:
o Using use cases and scenarios to evaluate how the architecture behaves under different
conditions.
o For example, you might simulate high loads or security threats to see how the
architecture responds.
3. Quality Attribute Scenarios:
o Evaluate the system architecture with specific quality goals, such as availability,
reliability, performance, and scalability.
4. Risk Analysis:
o Identify critical risks that could impact system performance or maintainability and
devise mitigation strategies.

Architecture Evaluation Methods:

 ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method): A method for evaluating software

architectures by analyzing trade-offs between quality attributes (e.g., performance vs.
scalability).
 SAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method): Focuses on analyzing the architecture for
modifiability and flexibility.
 CBAM (Cost Benefit Analysis Method): Helps evaluate architectural decisions by weighing the
costs and benefits of alternatives.

2. Software Architecture Design

Software architecture design is the process of defining the structure of a system, identifying its
components, and specifying their interactions. It involves transforming high-level business
requirements into a cohesive and maintainable architecture. This is a creative and iterative
process that requires balancing technical constraints, cost, and time.

Key Aspects of Architecture Design:

 High-Level Design: Creating a conceptual view of the system, focusing on major components
(e.g., database, application, UI) and their interactions.
 Componentization: Decomposing the system into manageable, reusable components, each of
which has a well-defined responsibility.
 Interoperability: Ensuring that components can interact with each other through well-defined
interfaces (e.g., APIs, messaging queues).
 Technology Selection: Choosing appropriate technologies (e.g., frameworks, libraries,
databases) that align with the architecture's goals (e.g., performance, scalability).
 Scalability and Performance: Designing for growth and ensuring the system can handle
increased loads (e.g., using microservices or distributed systems for scalability).
 Maintainability: Ensuring the system is easy to update and extend over time by following
principles like modularity, separation of concerns, and adherence to design patterns.
 Security: Designing the architecture with security in mind, including encryption, authentication,
authorization, and protection against common vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection, cross-site
scripting).

Design Principles:

 Separation of Concerns (SoC): Dividing the system into distinct modules or layers, each
responsible for a specific aspect of functionality (e.g., UI, business logic, data access).
 Loose Coupling: Ensuring components are minimally dependent on each other so that changes
to one component do not require changes to others.
 High Cohesion: Grouping related functionalities into cohesive modules or components that
handle specific tasks.
 Abstraction: Hiding the complexity of individual components behind interfaces or APIs, making
it easier to understand and modify the system.
 Reusability: Designing components that can be reused in other parts of the system or even in
other systems.

Common Design Patterns:

 Layered Architecture Pattern: Divides the system into layers (e.g., presentation, business logic,
data access), each responsible for specific tasks.
 Microservices Architecture: Divides the system into small, independent services that can be
developed, deployed, and scaled independently.
 Event-Driven Architecture: Focuses on the production, detection, and reaction to events (e.g.,
using message queues, event streams).
 Client-Server Architecture: A traditional pattern where a client requests services from a server
(e.g., web applications).
 MVC (Model-View-Controller): Separates the application into three main components (model,
view, and controller) to organize code and separate concerns.
 Repository Pattern: Used for abstracting data access, typically in the context of the data access
layer.
 Decorator Pattern: A structural pattern that allows behavior to be added to individual objects
without modifying their structure.

3. Architectural Styles and Patterns in Design

Choosing the right architectural style or pattern is crucial for achieving the desired system
qualities.

Common Architectural Styles:

1. Layered Architecture:
o Organizes the system into layers (e.g., presentation, business logic, data) to separate
concerns and improve maintainability.
o Example: Classic web applications where the UI, business logic, and data access layers
are separate.
2. Microservices Architecture:
o Divides the system into small, independent services that communicate via lightweight
protocols (e.g., REST, messaging queues).
o Each microservice can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently.
3. Event-Driven Architecture:
o Systems are driven by events or messages, where components (producers) generate
events, and other components (consumers) react to them.
o Example: Real-time systems, IoT applications, and financial systems.
4. Client-Server Architecture:
o A common model where a client (e.g., browser or mobile app) interacts with a
centralized server that provides services or data.
o Example: Web applications, RESTful APIs.
5. Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA):
o Systems are composed of loosely coupled, reusable services that communicate over a
network (usually via SOAP or REST).
o Example: Enterprise systems with multiple independent services (e.g., order processing,
payment, and shipping).
6. Monolithic Architecture:
o A single, unified application where all components are tightly integrated and deployed
together.
o Example: Traditional web applications before the rise of microservices.

4. Architecture Design Process

The process of designing software architecture typically follows these steps:

1. Requirements Gathering:
o Gather both functional and non-functional requirements.
o Collaborate with stakeholders (e.g., business analysts, customers) to ensure alignment
between business goals and technical requirements.
2. High-Level Design:
o Define the major components and their interactions.
o Choose an appropriate architectural style or pattern based on the requirements.
3. Component Design:
o Break down the system into individual components or services.
o Specify the responsibilities, interfaces, and dependencies of each component.
4. Detail Design:
o Design the inner workings of components (e.g., database schema, algorithms).
o Use design patterns to improve reusability, scalability, and maintainability.
5. Prototyping and Evaluation:
o Build prototypes or proof of concepts (PoCs) to test design choices.
o Evaluate the architecture with quality attribute scenarios (e.g., performance tests, load
testing).
6. Documenting the Architecture:
o Create architecture documentation using UML diagrams or architecture description
languages (ADLs).
o Provide clear documentation of component roles, interactions, and technology choices.

5. Role of Tools in Software Architecture Analysis and Design

Various tools support the architecture analysis and design processes:

 UML Tools: Tools like Lucidchart, Enterprise Architect, and Visual Paradigm can be used to
create UML diagrams (e.g., component, sequence, and class diagrams).
 Architecture Modeling Tools: Tools like Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Sofia allow
architects to model and analyze architectures.
 Performance and Load Testing Tools: Tools like Apache JMeter, Gatling, and LoadRunner help
assess the performance of the architecture under various load conditions.
 Static Code Analysis Tools: Tools like SonarQube and Checkstyle help analyze code quality and
ensure adherence to architectural standards.

Requirements for Architecture

The requirements for software architecture are both functional and non-functional, and they
define the essential qualities that the system must achieve. A successful architecture aligns with
the overall goals of the project while addressing various stakeholder concerns.

1. Functional Requirements

Functional requirements describe the specific behavior or functions of the system. For example:

 User login and authentication

 Data processing
 User interactions with the application
 Integration with third-party systems (APIs, databases)

While functional requirements define what the system should do, they are typically detailed in
terms of use cases, user stories, or system specifications.

2. Non-Functional Requirements (Quality Attributes)

Non-functional requirements describe how the system should behave, focusing on its quality and
performance characteristics. Some common non-functional requirements are:

 Performance: System responsiveness, throughput, latency (e.g., how quickly should the system
respond to user actions or process data?).
 Scalability: The ability of the system to grow, handling increased load or user demands.
 Security: Protecting the system from unauthorized access, data breaches, and vulnerabilities.
 Reliability: The system's ability to function without failure over time (e.g., uptime, fault
tolerance).
 Availability: The system's ability to be accessible and operational, typically defined in terms of
uptime percentage.
 Modifiability: How easy it is to make changes to the system (e.g., adding features or adapting to
new requirements).
 Usability: The ease with which users can interact with the system.
 Maintainability: The ability to perform updates, fixes, and improvements efficiently.
 Interoperability: The ability to integrate with other systems and technologies.

The architecture must be designed to meet these non-functional requirements while also fulfilling
the functional needs of the system.

Life-Cycle View of Architecture Design and Analysis

The life-cycle view of software architecture focuses on how the architecture evolves over time,
from initial conception to deployment and maintenance. It is often described in stages that
correspond to both analysis and design phases.

Phases of Software Architecture Life-Cycle

1. Inception (Initial Requirements Gathering and Planning)

o Identify stakeholders and collect functional and non-functional requirements.
o Create high-level goals for the architecture based on these requirements.
o Early architecture design decisions are made (e.g., choosing between monolithic vs.
microservices).
2. Architecture Design
o High-level architecture decisions are made, often based on architectural styles or
patterns (e.g., layered, microservices, client-server).
o Major components and their interactions are defined (e.g., databases, services, user
interfaces).
o Risk assessment and trade-off analysis are conducted.
3. Architecture Evaluation
o Analyze the architecture's ability to meet the requirements (using methods like ATAM
or SAAM).
o Prototyping or modeling is often used to simulate parts of the system.
o Perform cost-benefit analysis (e.g., CBAM) to evaluate different architectural
approaches.
4. Implementation
o Develop the system based on the architectural design.
o Implement components, establish communication protocols, and integrate with
external systems.
o Architectural decisions are refined during the implementation phase based on feedback
and prototype results.
5. Verification and Validation
o Test the system against the requirements (functional and non-functional).
o Perform load testing, stress testing, and other performance evaluations to validate non-
functional requirements.
o Continuous refinement of the architecture to fix issues or optimize performance.
6. Deployment
o Deploy the system to production.
o Ensure that deployment processes (e.g., DevOps pipelines, containerization) support the
architecture’s goals.
o Ensure proper monitoring is in place for uptime, performance, and security.
7. Maintenance and Evolution
o The architecture is evaluated and modified as needed to handle new requirements,
scale, and adjust to evolving technologies.
o Refactor components to improve modifiability or performance as needed.
o Incorporate feedback from real-world usage to improve and refine the architecture.

Architecture-Based Economic Analysis

Architecture-based economic analysis involves evaluating architectural decisions from a cost-

benefit perspective. It helps determine which design choices deliver the best return on
investment (ROI) and which architectural trade-offs align with business goals. Two widely used
methods in this domain are Cost-Benefit Analysis Method (CBAM) and Architecture
Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM).

1. Cost Benefit Analysis Method (CBAM)

CBAM (Cost-Benefit Analysis Method) is a systematic approach used to evaluate architectural

decisions by comparing their costs against the expected benefits. The goal is to provide a
quantitative basis for making architectural trade-offs.

Key Steps in CBAM:

1. Identify Architectural Decisions:

o Identify the architectural decisions that could influence the system’s quality attributes.
2. Determine Quality Attributes:
o Define which quality attributes (e.g., performance, security, scalability) will be evaluated
and how they will be measured (e.g., latency, throughput, availability).
3. Assign Value to Quality Attributes:
o Assign a monetary value or cost to the benefits of each quality attribute. For example,
improving performance might lead to increased user satisfaction, which translates into
higher sales.
4. Estimate Costs:
o For each architectural decision, estimate the associated costs (e.g., development time,
hardware resources, additional infrastructure).
5. Analyze Trade-Offs:
o Compare the costs against the benefits. The goal is to select the architectural decisions
that offer the best return on investment (ROI) while meeting key quality attributes.
6. Evaluate and Prioritize:
o Evaluate each option's cost-benefit ratio and prioritize architectural changes that
provide the highest ROI.

Use Cases of CBAM:

 Deciding between different architectural patterns (e.g., monolithic vs. microservices).

 Deciding on technology choices that balance cost, performance, and scalability (e.g., cloud vs.
on-premise hosting).
 Evaluating new features or components that might incur additional costs but deliver significant
business value (e.g., adding a new module for customer analytics).

2. Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM)

ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method) is an approach used to evaluate and analyze
the trade-offs inherent in architectural decisions. It is primarily focused on identifying and
managing risks in the architecture that could affect quality attributes.

Key Steps in ATAM:

1. Stakeholder Identification:
o Identify stakeholders (e.g., business owners, developers, users, operations) and their
concerns or quality attribute goals (e.g., performance, security, availability).
2. Define Architectural Strategies:
o Define architectural approaches and strategies that will be evaluated (e.g., choosing a
cloud-based solution or on-premise servers).
3. Create Scenarios:
o Develop scenarios based on stakeholder concerns. Scenarios help to explore the
system’s behavior under different conditions (e.g., peak traffic, security breaches).
4. Evaluate Trade-offs:
o Evaluate architectural decisions using quality attribute scenarios. This involves analyzing
how decisions impact key quality attributes like performance, scalability, and
modifiability.
5. Risk Identification:
o Identify potential risks and weaknesses in the architecture. This includes scenarios
where the architecture might fail or underperform.
6. Alternative Architectures:
o Present alternative architectural solutions to mitigate risks or improve performance,
along with their trade-offs.
7. Recommendation:
o Provide recommendations to address identified risks and improve the overall
architecture, aligning with business goals.
Use Cases of ATAM:

 Evaluating architectural designs for large, complex systems (e.g., cloud-based platforms,
distributed systems).
 Analyzing trade-offs between competing design solutions (e.g., database choices, third-party
integrations).
 Assessing the impact of changes to the system’s architecture over time (e.g., re-architecting to
accommodate increased user load).

Comparison of CBAM and ATAM

Aspect CBAM (Cost-Benefit Analysis Method) ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method)

Quantify the cost and benefits of Evaluate trade-offs and risks in architectural
Purpose
architectural decisions decisions

Risks and quality attributes (e.g., performance,

Focus ROI (cost vs. benefit)
scalability)

Key Cost-benefit analysis and prioritization Identification of risks, trade-offs, and alternative
Outcome of decisions solutions

Economic analysis of architecture Evaluating the impact of decisions on quality

Use
decisions attributes and system risks

Active Reviews for Intermediate Design (ARID)

Active Reviews for Intermediate Design (ARID) is a structured review technique aimed at
evaluating the software architecture during its intermediate design phase. This review process
ensures that the architecture is on track to meet the specified requirements and that potential risks
or design flaws are identified before full-scale implementation begins.

The key principle behind ARID is to engage stakeholders actively during the review process,
ensuring that the architecture aligns with both functional and non-functional requirements. By
identifying and addressing issues early in the design phase, ARID helps mitigate the risk of
costly rework or failure later in the project lifecycle.

Key Objectives of ARID

1. Evaluate Intermediate Designs:

o The focus of ARID is to assess architecture in the intermediate design phase when the
design is sufficiently detailed but not yet implemented. This stage is often the most
critical point to address any conceptual design flaws.
2. Ensure Alignment with Requirements:
o Confirm that the design aligns with functional and non-functional requirements (such
as performance, security, and scalability). The review aims to identify gaps in the design
or areas where the architecture may not fully satisfy the stated requirements.
3. Identify Potential Risks:
o Detect risks related to architectural decisions (e.g., dependencies, scalability concerns,
performance bottlenecks) that could impact the project's success. This includes checking
whether trade-offs have been properly evaluated, particularly in regard to quality
attributes (e.g., availability, maintainability).
4. Involve Stakeholders:
o Engage all relevant stakeholders (e.g., developers, business analysts, operations team,
product managers) to provide input, ensuring that the architecture meets business
goals and is technically feasible.

Process of ARID

The ARID process involves several phases that help structure the review and ensure that the
architecture is evaluated from various perspectives. Below are the typical steps involved in
conducting an ARID review:

1. Preparation for the Review

 Define the Scope: Identify the specific architectural elements or components to be reviewed
(e.g., database design, communication protocols, data flows).
 Select Stakeholders: Ensure that all relevant stakeholders are part of the review process, such
as:
o Technical leads and architects
o Developers and system integrators
o Business stakeholders or product owners
o Security experts, if applicable
 Gather Documents: Collect all necessary documentation, such as design documents,
architectural models (e.g., UML diagrams), and requirement specifications.
 Set Review Goals: Define the specific objectives of the review, such as validating design
decisions, identifying design flaws, assessing risks, or confirming that the architecture supports
key quality attributes.

2. Review Meetings

 Walkthrough the Design: The design team or architects walk the reviewers through the
architecture. The goal is to explain key design decisions, components, and interactions.
 Solicit Feedback: Ask stakeholders to provide feedback on whether the design addresses
requirements and quality attributes (e.g., performance, scalability). This step also identifies
areas where the design might not be feasible or optimal.
 Evaluate Design Alternatives: Discuss possible alternatives or trade-offs for each key design
decision. If multiple solutions are possible, the reviewers should consider the advantages and
disadvantages of each.
 Risk Identification: Identify risks in the architecture that could affect its long-term success. This
might include technical debt, scalability issues, security vulnerabilities, or integration challenges.
3. Analyze Feedback and Risks

 Assess Design Quality: Evaluate how well the design addresses both functional and non-
functional requirements. This might involve running through a set of quality attribute scenarios
to evaluate the design's performance under different conditions (e.g., load, fault tolerance,
security breaches).
 Identify Major Risks: Identify potential high-risk areas that could affect the architecture's
success. This could involve issues like:
o Scalability: Will the system be able to scale effectively as the user base or data grows?
o Performance: Is the system expected to perform efficiently under load, and does the
design support that?
o Security: Are there any obvious vulnerabilities in the architecture that could expose the
system to threats?
o Maintainability: Will the architecture be easy to maintain and extend in the future?

4. Document Results

 Create a Review Report: Summarize the findings of the review in a document that highlights
both strengths and weaknesses of the architecture. Include:
o An assessment of whether the architecture satisfies both functional and non-functional
requirements.
o Key risks, problems, or design flaws identified during the review.
o Recommended solutions, improvements, or alternatives for addressing issues.
o Any action items or follow-up tasks for the architecture team or stakeholders.
 Update Architecture Design: Based on the feedback and risks identified, update the
architecture. Make the necessary revisions and improvements to ensure that the design is
robust, scalable, and secure.

5. Follow-Up

 Review Changes: After updates to the architecture are made, perform a follow-up review to
ensure that the changes address the identified concerns. This ensures that the design evolves in
the right direction.
 Monitor Risks: Continue to monitor any identified risks and issues, particularly as the system
moves forward into the implementation phase. Reassess whether the architecture still meets
key requirements and quality attributes as new information becomes available.

Key Benefits of ARID

1. Early Risk Mitigation: By conducting reviews during the intermediate design phase,
potential risks can be identified and addressed before they impact the implementation or
deployment of the system. This helps reduce costly rework or design changes later in the
project.
2. Stakeholder Alignment: Involving stakeholders early ensures that all perspectives are
considered and that the architecture is aligned with both business and technical needs. It
provides an opportunity to clarify misunderstandings and ensure buy-in.
3. Improved Design Quality: Regular reviews help ensure that the design is robust and
follows best practices. Feedback from different stakeholders helps uncover design flaws
or missed opportunities for improvement.
4. Cost-Effective: By identifying problems early in the design phase, the cost of correcting
issues is typically much lower than making changes after implementation begins. This
can help avoid major cost overruns in the later stages of the project.
5. Better Decision-Making: ARID allows for better decision-making by involving multiple
stakeholders and considering all design options before settling on the best solution. It also
helps evaluate alternative architectural strategies and designs from multiple perspectives.

Key Challenges with ARID

1. Time and Resource Intensive: ARID reviews require coordination among various stakeholders
and can take significant time and effort, especially for complex architectures.
2. Stakeholder Availability: Getting all relevant stakeholders to participate actively in the review
process can be challenging, particularly if they have competing priorities or time constraints.
3. Objective Evaluation: Ensuring that the review is focused on objectively assessing design
decisions, rather than personal preferences or biases, can sometimes be difficult.

ADD Process Overview

The ADD method involves several key steps, typically organized into an iterative process. These
steps are structured to ensure that architectural decisions align with desired quality attributes and
allow for refinement over time.

Step 1: Identify the Desired Quality Attributes

 Define quality attribute goals based on the system’s requirements. These goals should be
aligned with non-functional requirements like performance, scalability, security, etc.
 Examples of quality attributes include:
o Performance: Speed, response time, throughput.
o Modifiability: Ease of adapting the system to future changes.
o Scalability: Ability to handle increasing loads or users.
o Availability: System uptime and fault tolerance.
o Security: Confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and authorization.

Step 2: Decompose the System into Subsystems

 The next step is to decompose the system into subsystems or components based on the quality
attribute goals. Each subsystem or component should be designed to achieve specific quality
attributes.
o For example, to achieve scalability, a subsystem might need to handle load balancing,
data partitioning, or caching.
o For security, a subsystem might focus on user authentication, encryption, or secure data
transmission.
Step 3: Generate Design Alternatives for Each Subsystem

 Generate multiple architectural alternatives for each subsystem that could satisfy the identified
quality attributes.
o For example, if performance is a priority, alternatives might include:
 Optimizing the database schema for fast queries.
 Using in-memory caching to reduce database load.
 Offloading intensive computations to background workers.
o The goal is to explore various potential solutions and design spaces to identify the most
appropriate approach for each subsystem.

Step 4: Evaluate Alternatives Against Quality Attributes

 Evaluate each design alternative based on its ability to meet the quality attribute goals. This
evaluation is usually done through trade-off analysis, where the benefits and trade-offs of each
alternative are considered.
o For instance, a design that improves performance might reduce modifiability or
security.
o A system designed for high availability might require redundancy and increased costs
(in terms of infrastructure).

Step 5: Refine the Design Iteratively

 The design is refined iteratively, incorporating feedback, adjusting decisions, and making trade-
offs to better meet the desired quality attributes.
 In each iteration, the architecture evolves to better align with the system's evolving
requirements and constraints.

Step 6: Document the Design Decisions

 Throughout the ADD process, it's essential to document design decisions, including the
rationale behind them and their impact on quality attributes.
 This documentation helps ensure that decisions can be revisited or revised later if necessary and
provides traceability from requirements to architecture.

Example of ADD in Practice

Let’s take an example of designing a web application that requires high availability and
scalability.

1. Quality Attribute Goals:

o High availability: The system should be highly available and resilient to failures.
o Scalability: The system should be able to scale as the number of users grows.
2. Decompose into Subsystems:
o Database Subsystem: Must be scalable and fault-tolerant.
o Application Server Subsystem: Must support load balancing and horizontal scaling.
o Cache Subsystem: Must minimize database load and support rapid access.
3. Generate Design Alternatives:
o For database scalability, alternatives might include:
 Sharding the database across multiple servers.
 Using a NoSQL database like MongoDB for easier horizontal scaling.
o For high availability, alternatives might include:
 Replication of the database across multiple data centers.
 Using auto-scaling features in cloud environments.
o For caching, alternatives might include:
 Using Memcached or Redis to cache frequently accessed data.
4. Evaluate Alternatives:
o Sharding the database may improve scalability but could complicate data consistency.
o Database replication increases availability but could impact write performance.
o Using a NoSQL database may be a better fit for scalability but could sacrifice data
integrity.
5. Refine the Design:
o After reviewing the trade-offs, the team might choose to:
 Use NoSQL for certain data that require scaling but keep a relational database
for critical transactional data.
 Implement active-active replication for database availability.
 Use Redis for caching and ensure it is fault-tolerant.

Key Benefits of Attribute-Driven Design

1. Quality Attribute Focus:

o ADD provides a structured framework for achieving the system’s desired quality
attributes. By making these attributes central to the design process, ADD ensures that
they are explicitly addressed throughout the architectural design.
2. Trade-off Analysis:
o ADD encourages careful trade-off analysis when evaluating different design
alternatives, helping architects understand the consequences of each decision and make
informed choices.
3. Iterative Refinement:
o The method promotes an iterative approach, allowing architects to progressively refine
the design while maintaining flexibility to adjust to changing requirements.
4. Traceability:
o By documenting design decisions and rationale, ADD ensures traceability from
requirements to architecture, making it easier to revisit decisions or adjust the
architecture as needed.
5. Alignment with Business Goals:
o By emphasizing quality attributes, ADD ensures that the architecture is aligned with the
system’s business goals (e.g., scalability for user growth, availability for critical services).
Challenges and Considerations with ADD

1. Complexity:
o ADD can become complex when dealing with multiple competing quality attributes.
Balancing these attributes often requires trade-offs and careful consideration of the
system’s goals.
2. Resource-Intensive:
o The iterative and analytical nature of ADD can be time-consuming, especially for large
systems or systems with many quality attributes to consider.
3. Requires Skilled Architects:
o ADD requires a high level of expertise in architecture, as architects need to have a deep
understanding of both the system’s goals and the technical trade-offs between
alternatives.
4. Involvement of Stakeholders:
o Successful attribute-driven design requires collaboration with stakeholders to ensure
that quality attribute goals are correctly identified and that the design aligns with
business and operational requirements.

Architecture Reuse

Architecture reuse refers to the practice of reusing pre-existing software architectures, or

architectural components, in new systems or projects. This approach can help accelerate
development, improve consistency, and leverage proven solutions. Reusing architecture reduces
the need to start from scratch with each new system, increasing productivity and potentially
improving the quality of new systems by building upon well-tested and refined designs.

Architecture reuse can occur at different levels:

 Design-level reuse: Reusing an architectural style or pattern (e.g., layered architecture,

microservices).
 Component-level reuse: Reusing specific architectural components, such as services, modules,
or libraries, that have been developed and tested previously.
 Pattern-level reuse: Reusing proven architectural patterns, like the Model-View-Controller
(MVC) pattern, which provides a reusable solution to common design problems.

Benefits of Architecture Reuse:

1. Faster Development: By leveraging pre-built architectures, organizations can speed up the

development process and reduce the time-to-market.
2. Consistency: Reusing proven architectural solutions ensures that common challenges are
addressed consistently across multiple projects.
3. Quality Assurance: Reusing proven architectures or components typically means that they have
already been tested and refined, reducing the likelihood of introducing new errors.
4. Cost Savings: Reusing architecture reduces development costs by avoiding the need to rebuild
common components or design patterns.
5. Risk Reduction: Reusing existing, well-understood solutions lowers the risk of introducing
unforeseen problems and helps mitigate technical debt.

Challenges of Architecture Reuse:

1. Rigidity: Pre-existing architectures may not fit the specific needs or constraints of the new
system, requiring adjustments that could increase complexity.
2. Compatibility Issues: Reusing architectures across different projects may lead to compatibility
issues if the system’s technological stack or other dependencies differ.
3. Overhead: Implementing reusable architectures might require extra effort in terms of
documentation, knowledge transfer, and integration.
4. Lack of Flexibility: Reusing components or patterns may restrict flexibility or impose
unnecessary constraints on the new system, especially when custom requirements are needed.

Domain-Specific Software Architecture

Domain-Specific Software Architecture (DSSA) is a specialized approach where software

architectures are designed to address the needs of a particular domain or problem space. The
idea is to create a set of reusable architectural solutions, patterns, or frameworks tailored to a
specific industry or application type, such as e-commerce, healthcare, finance, or
telecommunications.

In DSSA, software architectures are customized to solve domain-specific challenges, adhere to

domain standards, and leverage domain-specific knowledge, tools, and libraries.

Key Features of Domain-Specific Software Architecture:

1. Customization for Domain Needs: DSSA aims to optimize the architecture for the
unique characteristics and challenges of the domain. For example, an e-commerce
architecture might be designed to handle high concurrency, secure transactions, and
complex product catalogs.
2. Reusability within the Domain: Like other forms of architecture reuse, DSSA
emphasizes the reuse of components, frameworks, and solutions specific to the domain,
which can accelerate the development process for new applications within the same
domain.
3. Patterns and Templates: In many cases, DSSA includes domain-specific architectural
patterns and templates that provide a starting point for designing systems within the
domain. For instance, a cloud-native architecture for SaaS applications may include
common patterns like microservices, containerization, and API gateways.
4. Domain Expertise: DSSA involves the collaboration of domain experts (e.g., financial
specialists for a banking system, or healthcare professionals for medical applications) to
ensure that the architecture addresses the domain's needs comprehensively.
5. Compliance with Domain Standards: Many domains have specific standards or
regulations (such as HIPAA for healthcare, PCI-DSS for payment processing, or ISO
9001 for quality management systems). DSSA ensures that the architecture complies with
relevant legal, regulatory, and industry standards.
Benefits of Domain-Specific Software Architecture

1. Accelerated Development: By reusing domain-specific solutions and patterns, the

development cycle can be accelerated, as many of the system’s challenges have already
been addressed by the architecture.
2. Better Alignment with Business Goals: Domain-specific architectures are built with the
unique needs of the business or application in mind, leading to better alignment between
the architecture and the overall business objectives.
3. Higher Quality: DSSA provides architectures that have been refined over time by
domain experts. This can improve the quality of the system, as it is designed to handle
domain-specific challenges.
4. Reduced Risk: By using proven, domain-specific patterns and templates, organizations
can reduce the risk of architecture failures, since the system is built on a foundation that
has already been tested in similar environments.
5. Cost Reduction: Leveraging pre-built domain-specific architectures can reduce costs
associated with designing complex systems from scratch, particularly when many
components can be reused.
6. Compliance: Many industries have strict regulations. Domain-specific architectures are
often designed to adhere to these standards, reducing the effort required for ensuring
compliance.

Challenges of Domain-Specific Software Architecture

1. Limited Flexibility: A DSSA solution might be too rigid and may not accommodate the
unique needs of every project within the domain. Customization may be needed, which
could result in additional costs or time.
2. Over-engineering: If the DSSA includes too many features or generalizes too much, it
may lead to over-engineering, where the architecture becomes more complex than
necessary for smaller or simpler applications.
3. Knowledge Barrier: Creating domain-specific architectures often requires deep
knowledge of the domain, which may not be readily available or may involve significant
effort to acquire.
4. Maintenance of the Architecture: Domain-specific solutions may require ongoing
maintenance and updates to keep up with changing business needs or evolving standards
in the domain. This may require specialized expertise to ensure long-term sustainability.

Examples of Domain-Specific Software Architectures

1. E-Commerce Architecture:
o Components: Catalog management, user accounts, payment gateway, order
management, and inventory management.
o Challenges Addressed: Handling high transaction volume, integrating with third-party
payment processors, securing user data, supporting real-time inventory updates.
2. Healthcare Systems:
o Components: Patient management, electronic health records (EHR), scheduling, billing,
and telemedicine.
o Challenges Addressed: Data privacy and security (e.g., HIPAA compliance), integration
with medical devices, real-time updates, and scalable patient data storage.
3. Financial Systems:
o Components: Transaction processing, risk management, compliance tracking, and
reporting.
o Challenges Addressed: High availability and fault tolerance, real-time transaction
processing, regulatory compliance (e.g., PCI-DSS).
4. Telecommunications:
o Components: Call routing, billing, user management, messaging services, and network
monitoring.
o Challenges Addressed: Scalability to handle large amounts of traffic, integration with
legacy systems, managing real-time communications.

Domain-Specific Architectures and Frameworks

Some software frameworks and architectures have been created to address common needs within
specific domains. Examples include:

1. Spring Framework (Java) for enterprise-level web applications, offering domain-specific

components for business logic, persistence, and web interaction.
2. Apache Kafka for stream processing in distributed architectures, often used in domains like
finance, telecommunications, and IoT.
3. FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), a standard for exchanging healthcare
information, which drives the architecture of many modern healthcare applications.
4. Magento and Shopify for e-commerce systems, offering out-of-the-box domain-specific
components such as product catalogs, shopping carts, and payment systems.

Unit-5

Software Architecture Documentation

Software Architecture Documentation is a crucial aspect of the software development

lifecycle. It provides an organized and comprehensive description of the system's architecture,
including the key design decisions, components, interfaces, and interactions. Good
documentation facilitates communication among stakeholders, ensures that the system's design is
well-understood, and helps maintain the architecture over time as the system evolves.
Principles of Sound Documentation

Effective architecture documentation should adhere to the following principles to ensure that it is
useful, clear, and maintainable:

1. Clarity:
o Documentation should be clear and easy to understand by all stakeholders, including
developers, project managers, business analysts, and testers. Use simple language and
avoid jargon when possible. Diagrams should be readable and self-explanatory.
2. Consistency:
o Consistent terminology, notations, and structure across different sections of the
documentation are essential. Ensure that the same terms are used throughout the
document to avoid confusion.
3. Completeness:
o The documentation should provide a full overview of the architecture, including all
relevant components, their relationships, and the decisions that led to the architecture's
design. However, it should avoid unnecessary details that do not contribute to
understanding the system's architecture.
4. Traceability:
o Every design decision, particularly significant architectural choices, should be traceable
back to the system's requirements or business goals. Documenting the rationale behind
architectural decisions provides insight into why certain solutions were chosen.
5. Modularity and Maintainability:
o The documentation should be modular and easily updated. This includes keeping the
architecture up-to-date as the system evolves, and ensuring that the documentation can
be modified without significant rework when components change.
6. Audience-Specific:
o The documentation should be tailored to different audiences. For instance, high-level
architecture may be aimed at business stakeholders, while detailed technical diagrams
and code snippets may be directed at developers and architects.
7. Simplicity:
o While providing the necessary detail, architecture documentation should be concise and
not overloaded with information. Complex systems should be broken down into
understandable parts, and documentation should focus on what is most relevant to
each audience.

Refinement in Software Architecture Documentation

Refinement in architecture documentation refers to the process of progressively detailing the

system's architecture as the design evolves. Architecture starts at a high level of abstraction and
is refined to a more detailed representation as the project moves forward.

1. High-Level Refinement:
o Early documentation often focuses on the system’s goals, overall structure, and key
components. It describes how the system addresses the primary functional and non-
functional requirements, such as performance, scalability, and security. High-level
documents typically include context diagrams and architectural views.
2. Mid-Level Refinement:
o As the design matures, the documentation includes more detailed descriptions of
subsystems and components, with focus on their roles, interactions, and key design
decisions. This stage may include high-level component diagrams, data flow diagrams,
and details of the interfaces between components.
3. Low-Level Refinement:
o At the lowest level of refinement, the architecture documentation goes into great detail,
describing data structures, algorithms, interfaces, and protocols. It might also contain
descriptions of dependencies, database schemas, and deployment models. Detailed
design specifications are included to guide implementation.

Refinement ensures that the architecture is iteratively documented as more information

becomes available, and it reflects the level of development of the system.

Context Diagrams

A Context Diagram is a high-level, simplified representation of the system's architecture,

showing the system in relation to its external entities (actors, systems, users, etc.). It provides a
bird's-eye view of the system and its interactions with the outside world, helping stakeholders
quickly understand its boundaries and the scope of the system.

Key Features of Context Diagrams:

 External Entities: Identify all external systems, users, or stakeholders that interact with the
system. This could include clients, external services, or hardware devices.
 System Boundary: The context diagram defines what is inside and outside the system. It is a
boundary that distinguishes the system from its environment.
 Data Flow: Show the flow of data between the system and its external entities. This could
include inputs, outputs, and data exchanges.
 Simple Representation: The context diagram should avoid technical details and focus purely on
the interactions at a high level.

Example: For an online e-commerce platform, the context diagram might show:

 External entities: Customers, payment gateways, external inventory systems.

 System boundary: E-commerce application.
 Data flow: Customer makes a purchase → system interacts with payment gateway → updates
inventory → sends confirmation to customer.
Variability in Software Architecture Documentation

Variability refers to the aspects of the software architecture that can change or adapt depending
on certain factors, such as user requirements, business rules, or environmental constraints.
Documenting variability in software architecture is important for systems that need to be flexible
or customizable for different contexts or use cases.

1. Types of Variability:
o Functional Variability: This refers to different ways the system might meet functional
requirements. For example, a system might have different modules or components that
can be enabled or disabled based on user needs or deployment environments.
o Non-Functional Variability: Variability can also relate to performance, security, or
scalability requirements. For instance, a system might be designed to support different
levels of performance based on the deployment environment (e.g., cloud-based systems
with elastic scaling).
o Deployment Variability: A system’s deployment might vary depending on whether it is
running on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. Documentation of
deployment options allows the system to be customized for different infrastructures.
o Configuration Variability: The system may allow different configurations for certain
features, like enabling/disabling logging, toggling caching mechanisms, or selecting
different database backends.
2. Documenting Variability:
o Architectural Views: Provide separate views or sections that describe how the
architecture changes or adapts under different configurations. For example, show how
the system operates in a single-tenant vs. multi-tenant deployment model.
o Feature Flags: If the system supports feature toggles, document which features are
optional or can be enabled/disabled at runtime.
o Configurations: Document the different configurations for different types of
environments (e.g., development, staging, production) and how these affect the
architecture.

Example: In a microservices-based system, you might document:

 Which microservices are optional depending on whether certain features are activated (e.g., a
recommendation engine that is only enabled in premium subscriptions).
 The configuration of database replication strategies that vary based on the system’s scale or
environment.

Software Interfaces in Architecture Documentation

Software interfaces are the points of interaction between different components, subsystems, or
external systems. Documenting software interfaces is critical because it clarifies how different
parts of the system communicate with each other, and defines expectations regarding data
format, protocols, and error handling.
Types of Software Interfaces:

1. Internal Interfaces: These describe interactions between components or subsystems

within the system. For example, a service in a microservices architecture may
communicate with other services via RESTful APIs or message queues.
2. External Interfaces: These describe how the system interacts with external systems,
services, or users. For example, a payment gateway interface defines how the system
communicates with external payment processors.
3. APIs (Application Programming Interfaces): Documenting APIs is a crucial part of
architectural documentation. This includes the endpoints, methods, expected inputs and
outputs, error handling, and authentication mechanisms.
o RESTful APIs: Documenting endpoints, HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE), URL
patterns, and response formats (JSON, XML).
o SOAP APIs: For SOAP-based services, include the WSDL (Web Services Description
Language) and SOAP message format.
4. Protocols: Specify the protocols used for communication between components, such as
HTTP, HTTPS, WebSockets, gRPC, or messaging protocols like AMQP.
5. Data Formats: Specify the data formats used for communication. This might include:
o JSON or XML for data exchange between web services.
o CSV, Protobuf, or Avro for internal data exchange or batch processing.
6. Error Handling and Security:
o Describe how errors are handled in interactions (e.g., error codes, retry strategies,
timeouts).
o Specify security aspects of the interfaces, such as authentication mechanisms (OAuth,
JWT tokens), data encryption, and message integrity.

Documenting Interfaces:

 Interface Diagrams: Use diagrams to show the relationship between interfaces and the
components they connect. For example, a sequence diagram can show the flow of interactions
between services.
 Interface Specifications: Include detailed descriptions of each interface, including the data
model, expected inputs/outputs, and any constraints or rules.
 Versioning: Document how interfaces are versioned, especially for APIs, and describe backward
compatibility considerations.

Example: For a payment service in an e-commerce system:

 Payment API: /payment/process

o Request: POST /payment/process {amount: 100, currency: USD,
payment_method: 'credit_card'}
o Response: {status: 'success', transaction_id: '12345'}
o Error Handling: 400 Bad Request if missing payment details.
Documenting the Behavior of Software Elements and Software Systems

Documenting the behavior of software elements and systems is a critical part of software
architecture and design documentation. Behavior documentation explains how the system or its
components behave under various conditions, including normal and error scenarios. It provides
essential insights for developers, testers, and stakeholders to understand how different parts of
the system interact and how they respond to inputs or changes.

Behavior documentation can take various forms, including state machines, sequence diagrams,
use case scenarios, activity diagrams, and interaction diagrams. These elements together
illustrate the dynamic behavior of the system, such as transitions between states, the order of
operations, and the flow of data.

Key Types of Behavior Documentation:

1. State Machines:
State machine diagrams describe how a system or component changes state in response to
inputs, events, or conditions. They show the different states the system can be in and the
transitions that occur between them.
o Example: A user login process might have states like "Logged Out," "Authenticating,"
and "Logged In," with transitions triggered by events like "Enter Credentials" or
"Authentication Success."
2. Sequence Diagrams:
Sequence diagrams show how objects or components interact in a specific sequence of
operations, typically over time. They depict the flow of messages between system
components and the order in which these interactions occur.
o Example: In an order processing system, a sequence diagram could show the flow of
messages between the customer, the shopping cart, payment gateway, and inventory
system.
3. Use Case Scenarios:
Use case documentation describes the expected interactions between a system and its
users (or other systems) from the perspective of user goals. Use cases help to clarify
functional requirements by showing the behavior of the system during normal operations.
o Example: A use case for placing an order might describe the user entering product
details, proceeding to checkout, and confirming the order.
4. Activity Diagrams:
Activity diagrams illustrate workflows and the flow of control between activities or tasks
within the system. They are useful for visualizing concurrent processes, decision points,
and the flow of data.
o Example: In an approval workflow, an activity diagram could show the steps involved in
reviewing and approving a document, with decisions about whether the document
passes review or requires modification.
5. Interaction Diagrams:
Interaction diagrams combine elements of sequence and collaboration diagrams to show
how different objects collaborate to achieve a specific function. They represent the
dynamic behavior of the system over time.
o Example: In a messaging system, an interaction diagram could depict how a user sends
a message, how the server processes it, and how it is delivered to the recipient.

Documentation Package Using a Seven-Part Template

A Seven-Part Template is a structured approach to documenting software behavior. This

template helps organize documentation so that it covers all aspects of system behavior in a
consistent and easy-to-follow manner. Below is an outline for creating a documentation package
using a seven-part template.

1. Overview of the System

 Purpose: Provide a brief description of the software system or software element whose
behavior is being documented. This should include a high-level explanation of its purpose,
functionality, and intended audience (e.g., end users, system administrators, or other systems).
 Scope: Define the boundaries of the system or software element. What parts of the system are
being documented? What are the limits of the behavior being described?
 Context: Identify how the system fits within a larger ecosystem. For example, is it a part of a
web application, a microservice, or a mobile app? How does it interact with other systems or
components?

2. Functional Behavior

 Functional Requirements: List and describe the core functions or features that the
software system must perform. Each function should have a clear explanation of what it
does and why it is important.
 Use Case Descriptions: Provide a set of key use cases that describe how the system
behaves in response to user interactions. Each use case should include:
o Actors (who interacts with the system: users, other systems)
o Preconditions (what must be true before the use case can begin)
o Basic Flow (the typical steps or sequence of events)
o Alternate Flows (variations, exceptions, or error conditions)
o Postconditions (what happens after the use case ends)
 Example: A use case for “User Login” might describe the steps a user takes to log in and
what happens if they enter incorrect credentials.

3. Non-Functional Behavior

 Performance: Document how the system should behave under various performance conditions.
For example, describe the system's expected response times, throughput, or scalability under
heavy load.
 Security: Detail the expected security behaviors, such as data encryption, user authentication,
and protection against common vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection, cross-site scripting).
 Reliability and Availability: Describe how the system behaves in terms of uptime, fault
tolerance, and recovery from failure. This could include behaviors such as automatic failover,
retries, or grace periods during outages.
 Example: An e-commerce system might need to process 100 transactions per second with a
99.9% uptime guarantee.

4. Interface Behavior

 External Interfaces: Describe the external APIs, services, or systems the software
interacts with. This includes the expected inputs, outputs, and error handling for each
interface. If applicable, document how the system communicates with external systems
via web services (REST, SOAP) or messaging protocols (e.g., Kafka, RabbitMQ).
 Internal Interfaces: Describe how internal components or services communicate with
each other. This could include APIs between microservices, database interactions, or the
flow of data between subsystems.
 Example: Document the interface for a payment API, including the endpoint for
initiating a payment (POST /payment/charge), expected parameters (amount, payment
method), and response structure ({status: "success", transactionId: "12345"}).

5. State and Event Behavior

 State Transitions: If the system or its components exhibit different states, describe the states
and the conditions or events that cause transitions between them. This is often represented
using state diagrams or state machines.
 Events: Define the events that trigger actions or state changes in the system. These events could
be user actions, timeouts, system errors, or data updates.
 Example: A state machine for a User Registration process might have states such as "New
User," "Email Verification Pending," and "Registered," with transitions triggered by user actions
(e.g., clicking a verification link).

6. Error and Exception Handling

 Error Scenarios: Identify common error conditions or failure scenarios and explain how the
system should behave in response. Document the expected outcomes when things go wrong,
such as retries, user notifications, or system logging.
 Exception Handling: If applicable, describe how exceptions are caught, logged, and reported.
Include any fallback mechanisms or recovery strategies.
 Example: A payment processing system might document what happens when a payment fails
(e.g., retry the transaction after 5 minutes, log the error, notify the user).

7. Glossary and References

 Glossary: Provide definitions for any specialized terminology or abbreviations used

throughout the documentation. This helps ensure that all readers have a clear
understanding of the terms used.
 References: List related documents, resources, or external references that provide more
context or details about the software. This could include design documents, API
documentation, user manuals, or technical specifications.
 Example: If a system uses a custom encryption algorithm, include references to the
algorithm’s documentation or specifications.

Example: Seven-Part Documentation Template for an E-Commerce System

1. Overview of the System

 Purpose: The e-commerce system allows users to browse products, place orders, and make
payments online.
 Scope: This document covers the user-facing portion of the system, including product search,
order management, and payment processing.
 Context: The system interacts with a backend inventory service and external payment gateways.

2. Functional Behavior

 Use Case 1: User Login

o Actors: User, Authentication Service
o Preconditions: User is on the login page.
o Basic Flow: User enters credentials → System authenticates user → User is logged in.
o Alternate Flows: Incorrect credentials → System displays an error message.
o Postconditions: User is logged in and redirected to the homepage.

3. Non-Functional Behavior

 Performance: The system should handle 200 orders per minute without degradation in
performance.
 Security: Passwords are encrypted using SHA-256 and salted before storing them.
 Reliability: The system must be available 99.99% of the time.

4. Interface Behavior

 External API: /payment/charge — Initiates a payment.

o Input: amount, payment_method
o Response: {status: "success", transactionId: "12345"}

5. State and Event Behavior

 State Transitions:
o State 1: Cart Empty → Event: User adds an item to the cart → State 2: Cart with items.
o **State 2