Unit 2 Notes
Unit 2 Notes
• Core Principle: Wind ows over specially shaped blades (airfoils), creating aerodynamic
lift (similar to an airplane wing) and drag forces. The lift force is much stronger and causes
the blades to rotate around a central hub.
• Function: This rotation drives a shaft connected to a generator, which produces electricity.
Modern turbines are sophisticated machines optimized for ef ciency, durability, and grid
compatibility.
3. Types of Wind Energy Systems
Wind energy systems can be categorized in several ways:
◦ Description: The most common type. The main rotor shaft and electrical generator
are positioned at the top of a tower, and the blades rotate around a horizontal axis,
parallel to the ground.
◦ Operation: They must be pointed directly into the wind, typically using a yaw drive
mechanism.
◦ Advantages: High ef ciency, mature technology, scalable to very large sizes (multi-
megawatt).
◦ Disadvantages: Tall towers required, complex yaw mechanism needed, stress on
blades due to gravity and wind shear.
◦ Sub-types: Typically classi ed by the number of blades (most commonly three) and
whether they are upwind (blades face the wind) or downwind (blades are behind the
tower relative to wind direction). Upwind designs are dominant.
• Vertical Axis Wind Turbines (VAWTs):
fi
fl
fi
fi
◦ Description: The main rotor shaft is arranged vertically. Blades rotate around a
vertical axis.
◦ Operation: They are omnidirectional, meaning they don't need to be pointed into the
wind. The gearbox and generator can be placed near the ground.
◦ Advantages: Omnidirectional operation, easier maintenance (ground-level
components), potentially better suited for turbulent wind conditions found in urban
areas.
◦ Disadvantages: Generally lower ef ciency than HAWTs, can be harder to self-start
(some designs), experience signi cant cyclic stress on blades, typically not built in
very large sizes.
◦ Sub-types:
▪ Darrieus Turbine: "Eggbeater" shape, uses lift forces, high ef ciency for a
VAWT but needs starting assistance.
▪ Savonius Turbine: S-shaped scoops, uses drag forces, lower ef ciency but
self-starting and good torque. Often used in hybrid designs or small
applications.
b) Based on Location:
• Onshore Wind Farms: Turbines located on land. This is the most common and currently
most cost-effective form of large-scale wind energy deployment. Requires suf cient land
area and good wind resources.
• Offshore Wind Farms: Turbines located in bodies of water, usually oceans or large lakes.
◦ Advantages: Access to stronger and more consistent winds, potential for larger
turbines, less visual impact from shore (if far enough out).
◦ Disadvantages: Higher installation and maintenance costs, challenges with
foundation construction and grid connection (undersea cables). Foundation types
include monopiles, jackets, tripods, and oating structures for deep water.
c) Based on Scale/Application:
• Utility-Scale Wind: Large turbines (typically > 1 MW each) grouped into wind farms,
generating electricity fed directly into the transmission grid.
• Distributed or Small Wind: Smaller turbines (ranging from <1 kW to ~100 kW) used for
local power generation, often for homes, farms, or small businesses. Can be grid-connected
or off-grid (with batteries).
4. Typical Construction of Various Wind Energy Systems
We will focus primarily on the construction of a modern Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT),
as it is the dominant technology:
• Foundation: Anchors the turbine to the ground. Typically a large mass of reinforced
concrete, sometimes incorporating steel piles, designed to withstand the turbine's weight and
operational loads. Offshore foundations are more complex (e.g., monopiles driven into the
seabed, jacket structures, or oating platforms).
• Tower: Supports the nacelle and rotor at a height where wind speeds are typically stronger
and less turbulent. Usually made of tubular steel sections bolted together, but concrete or
lattice towers are also used sometimes. Tower height varies signi cantly (often 80-160
meters or more for modern utility-scale turbines).
• Nacelle: The housing located at the top of the tower that contains the main power generation
components:
◦ Main Shaft: Connects the rotor hub to the gearbox. Rotates at a relatively low speed
(e.g., 10-20 RPM).
fl
fi
fi
fl
fi
fi
fi
fi
◦ Gearbox (Optional but common): Increases the rotational speed from the main shaft
to the high speed required by most generators (e.g., 1500-1800 RPM). Some turbines
use "direct drive" systems where a specialized low-speed generator eliminates the
need for a gearbox.
◦ Generator: Converts the rotational mechanical energy into electrical energy, usually
producing AC power.
◦ Brake System: Mechanical brake used to stop the rotor during emergencies or
maintenance. Aerodynamic braking (pitching the blades) is the primary method for
controlling speed during operation.
◦ Controller: Electronic system that monitors wind conditions, turbine performance,
and grid requirements. It manages the yaw drive, pitch control, and generator output.
◦ Yaw Drive: Orients the nacelle and rotor into the wind using motors and gears.
◦ Anemometer & Wind Vane: Mounted on the nacelle to measure wind speed and
direction, providing data to the controller.
• Rotor: Consists of the blades and the hub.
◦ Blades: Capture the wind's energy. Modern utility-scale turbines typically have three
blades made from strong, lightweight composite materials (e.g., berglass reinforced
with polyester or epoxy, often incorporating carbon ber). Blade lengths can exceed
80-100 meters. They have sophisticated airfoil shapes designed for maximum
aerodynamic ef ciency. Many blades can change their angle (pitch) to optimize
energy capture and protect the turbine in high winds.
◦ Hub: Connects the blades to the main shaft. Contains the pitch control mechanism
for adjusting the blade angle.
Construction of VAWTs: Varies by type. Darrieus turbines have long, curved blades attached at the
top and bottom of the vertical shaft. Savonius turbines consist of stacked scoops. The generator and
gearbox (if used) are typically housed in a base structure near the ground.
1. Kinetic Energy in Wind: The wind possesses kinetic energy due to the mass and velocity
of the moving air.
◦ Formula: P_wind = ½ * ρ * A * v³
▪ ρ (rho) = air density (kg/m³ - typically ~1.225 kg/m³)
▪ A = rotor swept area (m²) = π * R² (for HAWT, R = blade radius)
▪ v = wind velocity (m/s)
◦ Numerical Example: Calculating Power in the Wind
▪ Assume a turbine with a blade radius (R) of 60 meters.
▪ Swept Area (A) = π * (60 m)² = π * 3600 m² ≈ 11,310 m²
▪ Assume standard air density (ρ) = 1.225 kg/m³
▪ Assume a wind speed (v) of 9 m/s (a moderate operational speed).
▪ P_wind = 0.5 * 1.225 kg/m³ * 11,310 m² * (9 m/s)³
▪ P_wind = 0.5 * 1.225 * 11,310 * 729 W
▪ P_wind ≈ 5,050,475 Watts ≈ 5.05 Megawatts (MW)
fi
fl
fi
fi
▪This is the total power available in the wind passing through the rotor disk at
9 m/s.
3. Power Extraction by Turbine: Turbines cannot extract all the wind's power (Betz Limit ≈
59.3%). The Coef cient of Performance (C_p) measures actual extraction ef ciency.
This is the total electricity generated by a turbine over an entire year. It's more meaningful than
instantaneous power because wind speed varies constantly. It depends heavily on the turbine's rated
power, the wind characteristics of the site (summarized by the Capacity Factor), and the turbine's
availability.
• Capacity Factor (CF): The ratio of the actual energy produced over a period (usually a
year) to the theoretical maximum energy that could have been produced if the turbine ran at
its full rated power continuously during that period. It accounts for wind variability (times
with no wind, low wind, or excessively high wind causing shutdown) and downtime
(maintenance/faults). Typical CFs range from 25% (poor sites) to over 50% (excellent
offshore sites); 30-40% is common for good onshore sites.
• Formula: AEP = Rated Power * Hours in a Year * Capacity Factor
• Numerical Example: Calculating AEP
◦ Assume our example turbine has a Rated Electrical Power of 3 MW (or 3,000 kW).
◦ Hours in a year = 365 days * 24 hours/day = 8760 hours.
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
◦ Assume a realistic Capacity Factor (CF) for a good onshore site = 35% (or 0.35).
◦ AEP = 3,000 kW * 8760 hours * 0.35
◦ AEP = 26,280,000 kWh * 0.35
◦ AEP = 9,198,000 kWh per year (or 9,198 MWh, or 9.2 GWh)
◦ This single 3 MW turbine is estimated to produce about 9.2 million kilowatt-hours of
electricity annually.
6. Environmental Impact of Wind Electricity Generators (with
Carbon Emission Savings Example)
Wind energy is one of the cleanest forms of electricity generation during operation, but it's not
entirely without environmental impact.
Advantages/Positive Impacts:
• Clean Energy: No greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, methane), air pollutants (SOx, NOx,
particulates), or water pollution during operation. Directly combats climate change and
improves air quality.
◦ Numerical Example: Calculating CO2 Emission Savings
▪ To estimate the CO2 savings, we compare the emissions from wind power
(effectively zero during operation) to the emissions from the electricity
generation mix it displaces. This varies greatly by region. Let's use a sample
emission factor for a grid heavily reliant on fossil fuels.
▪ Assume the grid's average emission factor is 600 grams of CO2 equivalent
per kilowatt-hour (g CO2e / kWh) or 0.6 kg CO2e / kWh. (Note: India's
grid emission factor, considering the current time (April 2025) and location
(Maharashtra), is approximately in this range but is subject to change and
speci c calculation methodologies).
▪ Using the AEP calculated above: 9,198,000 kWh/year.
▪ Annual CO2 Savings = AEP * Emission Factor
▪ Annual CO2 Savings = 9,198,000 kWh/year * 0.6 kg CO2e / kWh
▪ Annual CO2 Savings = 5,518,800 kg CO2e / year
▪ Annual CO2 Savings ≈ 5,519 tonnes of CO2e per year
▪ This single 3 MW wind turbine, by displacing power from a grid with this
emission factor, prevents the emission of over 5,500 tonnes of CO2 equivalent
greenhouse gases each year.
• Renewable: Wind is an inexhaustible resource driven by solar energy.
• Reduced Water Consumption: Unlike thermal power plants (coal, gas, nuclear), wind
turbines consume virtually no water for cooling during operation.
• Domestic Energy Source: Reduces reliance on imported fossil fuels, enhancing energy
security.
• Land Use Compatibility: While turbines require land, the footprint of the turbine base is
small. Activities like farming or grazing can often continue around the turbines. Offshore
wind avoids most direct land use con icts.
Disadvantages/Challenges/Negative Impacts:
• Visual Impact: Some people nd large turbines or wind farms aesthetically displeasing
("visual pollution"), especially in scenic landscapes.
• Noise: Turbines produce some noise, primarily aerodynamic ("swooshing" sound from
blades passing the tower) and, less commonly, mechanical noise from the gearbox/generator.
fi
fi
fl
Modern designs have reduced noise levels, and siting regulations often mandate minimum
distances from residences.
• Wildlife Impact:
◦ Birds and Bats: Collisions with rotating blades can kill birds and bats. The risk
varies greatly depending on the site location (e.g., migratory routes, foraging areas),
turbine design, and weather conditions. Signi cant research is ongoing into
mitigation strategies (siting, deterrents, temporary shutdowns during high-risk
periods).
◦ Habitat Disruption: Construction activities and access roads can disrupt local
habitats, although restoration efforts are common. Offshore construction can impact
marine ecosystems.
• Land Use (Construction & Infrastructure): Requires land for turbines, access roads,
substations, and transmission lines. Manufacturing facilities also occupy land.
• Manufacturing and Transport: Energy and resources (steel, concrete, copper, rare earth
elements for some generator types, composites) are consumed during manufacturing,
transport, and installation, leading to associated lifecycle emissions (though these are far
lower per kWh generated than fossil fuels).
• Intermittency: Wind speed uctuates, so electricity generation is variable. This requires
grid management strategies, energy storage (like batteries), or backup power sources to
ensure a reliable supply.
• Radar Interference: Large turbines can sometimes interfere with radar systems (aviation,
weather). Mitigation involves careful siting and potential technological solutions.
7. Conclusion
Wind energy technology, centered around increasingly sophisticated wind turbines (primarily
HAWTs), represents a mature, scalable, and vital tool in the transition towards sustainable energy
systems. By converting the kinetic energy of wind into electricity (governed by principles like P =
½ ρ A v³ C_p), wind power offers a clean alternative to fossil fuels, preventing signi cant
greenhouse gas emissions annually, as demonstrated by the calculations. While challenges related to
environmental impacts (wildlife, visual/noise, land use) and intermittency exist, ongoing research,
technological advancements, and careful planning aim to minimize these drawbacks, solidifying
wind energy's role as a cornerstone of future electricity generation.
fl
fi
fi