Home Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments

  • Gordon K Smyth
Published/Copyright: February 12, 2004

The problem of identifying differentially expressed genes in designed microarray experiments is considered. Lonnstedt and Speed (2002) derived an expression for the posterior odds of differential expression in a replicated two-color experiment using a simple hierarchical parametric model. The purpose of this paper is to develop the hierarchical model of Lonnstedt and Speed (2002) into a practical approach for general microarray experiments with arbitrary numbers of treatments and RNA samples. The model is reset in the context of general linear models with arbitrary coefficients and contrasts of interest. The approach applies equally well to both single channel and two color microarray experiments. Consistent, closed form estimators are derived for the hyperparameters in the model. The estimators proposed have robust behavior even for small numbers of arrays and allow for incomplete data arising from spot filtering or spot quality weights. The posterior odds statistic is reformulated in terms of a moderated t-statistic in which posterior residual standard deviations are used in place of ordinary standard deviations. The empirical Bayes approach is equivalent to shrinkage of the estimated sample variances towards a pooled estimate, resulting in far more stable inference when the number of arrays is small. The use of moderated t-statistics has the advantage over the posterior odds that the number of hyperparameters which need to estimated is reduced; in particular, knowledge of the non-null prior for the fold changes are not required. The moderated t-statistic is shown to follow a t-distribution with augmented degrees of freedom. The moderated t inferential approach extends to accommodate tests of composite null hypotheses through the use of moderated F-statistics. The performance of the methods is demonstrated in a simulation study. Results are presented for two publicly available data sets.

Published Online: 2004-2-12

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Article
  2. Using Alpha Wisely: Improving Power to Detect Multiple QTL
  3. Relating HIV-1 Sequence Variation to Replication Capacity via Trees and Forests
  4. Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments
  5. Asymptotic Optimality of Likelihood-Based Cross-Validation
  6. Using Importance Sampling to Improve Simulation in Linkage Analysis
  7. Model-Based Assignment and Inference of Protein Backbone Nuclear Magnetic Resonances
  8. Error-Rate and Decision-Theoretic Methods of Multiple Testing: Which Genes Have High Objective Probabilities of Differential Expression?
  9. Evaluation of Multiple Models to Distinguish Closely Related Forms of Disease Using DNA Microarray Data: an Application to Multiple Myeloma
  10. Saturation and Quantization Reduction in Microarray Experiments using Two Scans at Different Sensitivities
  11. Combining Nearest Neighbor Classifiers Versus Cross-Validation Selection
  12. Multiple Testing. Part I. Single-Step Procedures for Control of General Type I Error Rates
  13. Multiple Testing. Part II. Step-Down Procedures for Control of the Family-Wise Error Rate
  14. Augmentation Procedures for Control of the Generalized Family-Wise Error Rate and Tail Probabilities for the Proportion of False Positives
  15. Calculating the Statistical Significance of Changes in Pathway Activity From Gene Expression Data
  16. A Family-Based Association Test for Repeatedly Measured Quantitative Traits Adjusting for Unknown Environmental and/or Polygenic Effects
  17. Deletion/Substitution/Addition Algorithm in Learning with Applications in Genomics
  18. Classifying Gene Expression Profiles from Pairwise mRNA Comparisons
  19. Hierarchical Bayesian Neural Network for Gene Expression Temporal Patterns
  20. A Mixed Model Approach to Identify Yeast Transcriptional Regulatory Motifs via Microarray Experiments
  21. Mammalian Genomes Ease Location of Human DNA Functional Segments but Not Their Description
  22. On the Dependence Structure of Sequence Alignment Scores Calculated with Multiple Scoring Matrices
  23. Increasing Power for Tests of Genetic Association in the Presence of Phenotype and/or Genotype Error by Use of Double-Sampling
  24. A Method for Evaluating the Impact of Individual Haplotypes on Disease Incidence in Molecular Epidemiology Studies
  25. Statistical Methods for Identifying Conserved Residues in Multiple Sequence Alignment
  26. MergeMaid: R Tools for Merging and Cross-Study Validation of Gene Expression Data
  27. Sparse Inverse of Covariance Matrix of QTL Effects with Incomplete Marker Data
  28. Maximum Likelihood for Genome Phylogeny on Gene Content
  29. Confidence Levels for the Comparison of Microarray Experiments
  30. PLS Dimension Reduction for Classification with Microarray Data
  31. Statistical Analysis of Genomic Tag Data
  32. Statistical Analysis of Adsorption Models for Oligonucleotide Microarrays
  33. Statistical Significance Threshold Criteria For Analysis of Microarray Gene Expression Data
  34. A Compendium to Ensure Computational Reproducibility in High-Dimensional Classification Tasks
  35. Validation and Discovery in Markov Models of Genetics Data
  36. Making Sense of High-Throughput Protein-Protein Interaction Data
  37. Reader's Reaction
  38. Reader Reaction
  39. Response to Foulkes and De Gruttola
  40. Software Communication
  41. BayesMendel: an R Environment for Mendelian Risk Prediction
  42. Letter to the Editor
  43. Concerns About Unreliable Data from Spotted cDNA Microarrays Due to Cross-Hybridization and Sequence Errors
Downloaded on 29.5.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1544-6115.1027/html
Scroll to top button