Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
Appearance
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
- Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests
Uncontroversial technical requests
- Template:Myprefs (currently a redirect to Template:Preferences) → Template:Preferences (move · discuss) – "Myprefs" made sense with the original wording, which was replaced in Special:Diff/525028556 after Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 105#Small change to the top right menu. Nowadays, "Preferences" is a much better name for the template. Silent consensus at Template talk:Myprefs#Rename to Template:Preferences? —andrybak (talk) 13:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Nothing appears to be technically stopping you from moving this yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Technically yes, and I don't mind it per se, but I'm not a page mover, so I'd have to move subpages one-by-one, which is selfishly bothersome, but, most importantly, error-prone. —andrybak (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Honestly it would probably be a decent idea to grant move-subpages to template editor ... * Pppery * it has begun... 13:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Technically yes, and I don't mind it per se, but I'm not a page mover, so I'd have to move subpages one-by-one, which is selfishly bothersome, but, most importantly, error-prone. —andrybak (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Nothing appears to be technically stopping you from moving this yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sedoreoviridae → Reovirales (move · discuss) – Someone else messed this up so I'll explain. Reoviruses were previously the sole family (Reoviridae) in the order Reovirales.(search "reoviridae" across all releases then click "view" on 2020) The Reoviridae family was abolished[1] and reoviruses were promoted to the rank of order (Reovirales) since the order bears the same name as the former family. At the same time, the two subfamilies in Reoviridae (Sedoreovirinae and Spinareovirinae) were promoted to the rank of family (same names but -viridae instead of -virinae).[2][3] The article "Reoviridae" should have been moved to "Reovirales", but another user mistakenly moved it to "Sedoreoviridae",[4] which caused a bit of a mess. So that's why I am here. I'm not exactly sure if "Sedoreoviridae" should be moved directly to "Reovirales" or if it should be moved back to "Reoviridae" then "Reoviridae" moved to "Reovirales"; someone more experienced with moves may know and could help out here. The following request is part of this request. Velayinosu (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sedoreovirinae (currently a redirect to Sedoreoviridae) → Sedoreoviridae (move · discuss) – See above. Velayinosu (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Draft:Lux (Doctor Who) (currently a redirect to Lux (Doctor Who)) → Lux (Doctor Who) (move · discuss) – Ready for mainspace inclusion. TheDoctorWho (talk) 16:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
Contested technical requests
- Shruti Ulfat → Shruti Panwar (currently a redirect back to Shruti Ulfat) (move · discuss) – She got divorced and no longer uses that last name 2409:40E0:1008:14AF:9033:A0FF:FE87:E84B (talk) 04:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Need more time to find link previous request, but I believe it was paused pending confirmation that move vandalism in March 2023 was resolved and was removed because no on answered even after several days. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 10:18, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- My Life as a Teenage Robot → My Life As a Teenage Robot (currently a redirect back to My Life as a Teenage Robot) (move · discuss) – "As" should be capitalized. — Paper Luigi T • C 07:05, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- If I'm correct, per MOS:5 (and general titling practices) we do not capitalize short
conjunctionsprepositions? English hard. such as "as", so the current capitalization looks to be correct. ASUKITE 15:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC) - nope. it's correct as is Create a template (talk) 01:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- If I'm correct, per MOS:5 (and general titling practices) we do not capitalize short
- Orders, decorations, and medals of the Federal Republic of Germany → Orders, decorations, and medals of Germany (currently a redirect instead to Historical orders, decorations, and medals of Germany) (move · discuss) – As per WP:PRIMARY, WP:COMMOMNAME, WP:CONSISTENT with the Orders, decorations, and medals of China, Orders, decorations, and medals of Croatia, Orders, decorations, and medals of France, Orders, decorations, and medals of Hungary, Orders, decorations, and medals of Serbia. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 05:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- This is not uncontroversial and deserves a full discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Where can we start a discussion? — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 13:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- This is not uncontroversial and deserves a full discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Rugby World Cup → Men's Rugby World Cup (currently a redirect back to Rugby World Cup) (move · discuss) – article is only about Men's Rugby World Cup, not Rugby World Cup in general Uxue Uriarte (talk) 21:44, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Previously discussed in 2023, with the consensus being "Not moved". 162 etc. (talk) 06:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Per World Rugby’s official terminology, the correct name for this tournament is “Men's Rugby World Cup.” In 2023, World Rugby confirmed a return to gender-specific titles for clarity and parity, officially referring to the events as “Men’s Rugby World Cup” and “Women’s Rugby World Cup.” This move aligns with how the women's tournament is already titled on Wikipedia and ensures consistency with the sport’s governing body. Uxue Uriarte (talk) 17:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- The article has prior RM history, and therefore is ineligible for WP:RMT. See WP:PCM. 162 etc. (talk) 18:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Per World Rugby’s official terminology, the correct name for this tournament is “Men's Rugby World Cup.” In 2023, World Rugby confirmed a return to gender-specific titles for clarity and parity, officially referring to the events as “Men’s Rugby World Cup” and “Women’s Rugby World Cup.” This move aligns with how the women's tournament is already titled on Wikipedia and ensures consistency with the sport’s governing body. Uxue Uriarte (talk) 17:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Previously discussed in 2023, with the consensus being "Not moved". 162 etc. (talk) 06:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- FC Zhetysu → FC Jetisu (currently a redirect back to FC Zhetysu) (move · discuss) – Jetisu is correct Kazakh transliteration, e.g. regions of Jetisu in Kazakhstan Ashkazakh (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Per this RfC, en.wiki uses BGN/PCGN for romanization of Kazakh. 162 etc. (talk) 01:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Christian Peter Wilhelm Beuth → Peter Beuth (currently a redirect back to Christian Peter Wilhelm Beuth) (move · discuss) – Follows manual disambig of Peter Beuth (Hesse politician). The 19th century politician is clearly the primary topic. —Brigade Piron (talk) 19:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- This sort of PT change is rarely uncontroversial, however with the lack of other arguments, it does appear likely a historical figure would trump a modern politician under WP:PT2. That said, is this in fact the common name? The article is lacking in sources in its current state. ASUKITE 14:49, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Chandrapur Municipal Corporation → Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation (currently a redirect back to Chandrapur Municipal Corporation) (move · discuss) – name correction website 103.185.174.240 (talk) 05:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- The website seems to use both names, see the page linked by the IP and their about us page. Not sure what to do. Toadspike [Talk] 08:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- The website link CCMC itself stands for Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation, also it is clearly mentioned in left corner under the logo with English spelling Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation. That's enough for page move. 103.185.174.230 (talk) 08:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- This does not seem uncontroversial to me and deserves a full discussion. Pppery (alt) (talk) 17:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- The website link CCMC itself stands for Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation, also it is clearly mentioned in left corner under the logo with English spelling Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation. That's enough for page move. 103.185.174.230 (talk) 08:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- The website seems to use both names, see the page linked by the IP and their about us page. Not sure what to do. Toadspike [Talk] 08:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Rachele Mussolini → Rachele Guidi (currently a redirect back to Rachele Mussolini) (move · discuss) – since she's incorrectly called as Rachele Mussolini in the English-speaking world, and this being an encyclopedia, it's wrong to keep the title "Rachele Mussolini" JacktheBrown (talk) 17:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- We follow what reliable sources use. The Washington Post uses "Rachele Mussolini", so that seems good enough for me. 162 etc. (talk) 18:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Since reliable Italian sources write the CORRECT surname (Italian wives, unlike American wives, keep their own surnames and don't take their husband's), it makes much more sense to follow Italian reliable sources (example: la Repubblica) for this page, as for many articles about Italian politicians; why not do it in this article as well? JacktheBrown (talk) 15:14, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- WP:COMMONNAME: "(Wikipedia) prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources.)" 162 etc. (talk) 16:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- But throughout the article, with the sole exception of the title, it's written "Rachele Guidi"; this risks confusing readers. JacktheBrown (talk) 15:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- There's nothing stopping you from improving the article. I note that you've made several edits to it already. With that in mind, unless you can demonstrate that the WP:COMMONNAME is "Rachele Guidi", there is no reason to move the article. 162 etc. (talk) 01:33, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- But throughout the article, with the sole exception of the title, it's written "Rachele Guidi"; this risks confusing readers. JacktheBrown (talk) 15:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- WP:COMMONNAME: "(Wikipedia) prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources.)" 162 etc. (talk) 16:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Since reliable Italian sources write the CORRECT surname (Italian wives, unlike American wives, keep their own surnames and don't take their husband's), it makes much more sense to follow Italian reliable sources (example: la Repubblica) for this page, as for many articles about Italian politicians; why not do it in this article as well? JacktheBrown (talk) 15:14, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- We follow what reliable sources use. The Washington Post uses "Rachele Mussolini", so that seems good enough for me. 162 etc. (talk) 18:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Draft:Supreme Clientele 2 → Supreme Clientele 2 (currently a redirect instead to Ghostface Killah discography) (move · discuss) – The album is releasing in 2025. KingArti (talk) 19:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- Article is lacking sources and this seems premature. 162 etc. (talk) 19:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
- @KingArti I agree - best to wait until the album is released and covered in WP:RS to avoid it being deleted. ASUKITE 14:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Embassy of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in the Kingdom of Eswatini (currently a redirect to Embassy of Taiwan, Mbabane) → Embassy of Taiwan, Mbabane (move · discuss) – Common format to name embassies. —— Eric Liu(Talk・Guestbook) 05:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Ericliu1912 people usually place this as uncontroversial first, and you skip that step. Nonetheless, given the extensive move history between the two titles, I suggest opening up a proper move discussion to seal the deal. – robertsky (talk) 07:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- I do consider the nature of this article's moving log as the reason to put it here, which meanwhile wasn't controversial enough to guarantee a standalone move discuusion in the first place. —— Eric Liu(Talk・Guestbook) 08:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Ericliu1912, hmm.. Contested technical move section is essentially a signal for the applicant editor to either open a proper discussion or drop the idea. You putting the entry in this section does not make sense in this regard to me as you are the applicant editor, as the follow up suggestion as above is to open a discussion. Don't get me wrong, I did consider if it should be considered as reverting a undiscussed move, but the stable title for the article, as much as I can tell, is the current title. – robertsky (talk) 16:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- I do consider the nature of this article's moving log as the reason to put it here, which meanwhile wasn't controversial enough to guarantee a standalone move discuusion in the first place. —— Eric Liu(Talk・Guestbook) 08:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Ericliu1912 people usually place this as uncontroversial first, and you skip that step. Nonetheless, given the extensive move history between the two titles, I suggest opening up a proper move discussion to seal the deal. – robertsky (talk) 07:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Salman Shaikh (actor) (currently a redirect to Salman Shaikh) → Salman Shaikh (move · discuss) – The page does not need a disambiguation as there is no other article named Salman Shaikh. There is only one Salman Shaikh which is this actor Iamaninnocentsoul (talk) 15:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Iamaninnocentsoul There is a current AfD discussion. Wait for that discussion to be over first. – robertsky (talk) 16:41, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- African Americans → African-Americans (currently a redirect back to African Americans) (move · discuss) – Wiktionary has wikt:African American as the alternative form of wikt:African-American. I guess Afro-American took off first, but now an incorrect/racistly avoiding the w:Hyphenated American controversy retronym was made. Lumbering in thought (talk) 02:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Lumbering in thought, please hit the "discuss" link above. This article has been the subject of previous move discussions, making this a potentially controversial move that must go through a fulldiscussion and cannot be moved through a request here. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 03:14, 20 April 2025 (UTC)