User talk:Bunnypranav

This is Bunnypranav's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

It is 9:13 PM where this user lives.

Selected WikiLove

Order of the Lesser Scribe of Wikipedia

This award is given in recognition to Bunnypranav for accumulating at least 350 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the Gaza war (18 March 2025 – present)

Can you help to split Timeline of the Gaza war (18 March 2025 – present) by using May 2025 Gaza offensive (May 26) as a breakthrough event. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:12, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pachu Kannan: I'm okay with doing it, but I'm slightly confused with the dates. May 2025 Gaza offensive says the cabinet approval was on 4 May, start of IDF advances on 16 May, and first strikes on 18 May. There seems to be no exact clear line on which is the breakthrough event. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:36, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This proposal was made by Borgenland and it was supported by two users including me. The IDF also announced the start of this offensive on 16 May. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:46, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, 16 May is fine, above you said May 26, so I got a bit confused. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:48, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was my typing error. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:55, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Noted at Talk:Timeline of the Gaza war (18 March 2025 – 15 May 2025)#Timeline is far too long. Better to have monthly timelines as well. Protection is requested, should be done soon. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 09:20, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for your editor

Yayatube (talk) 13:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! Happy to help :D ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025-06 reuse

Thank you for undoing the reuse/hijacking/repurposing of Islamo-leftism. Unfortunately this was not done for Bibliography of Eurabia. Now several Wikipedia editions (and their replicates) wrongly say that the text «A Neo-Nationalist Network: The English Defence League and Europe's Counter-Jihad Movement» is a criticism of Islam. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Visite fortuitement prolongée, sorry but is there anything you would like me to do? I'm not aware of the intricacies of the topic, so didn't catch your message. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:59, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

«I'm not aware of the intricacies of the topic» => You do not need to know the intricacies of eurabia/criticism of islam in order to look at Bibliography of Eurabia, compare its current title with its content, understand that «The new name does not correspond to the page content nor the cited sources» (quote of the edit summary of your diff 1290028474), conclude that the page suffered an hostile repurposing, similar to Islamo-leftism a few weeks ago. You do need to know the intricacies of Wikipedia in order to undo an hostile repurposing however, but you showed by Special:Diff/1290027616 and Special:Diff/1290028474 that you have this knowledge. If The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is listed in Bibliography of books critical of Judaism then any non expert can see the problem. If texts carrying titles A Neo-Nationalist Network: The English Defence League and Europe's Counter-Jihad Movement, The Anti-Muslim Environment, The West's Last Chance, are listed in Bibliography of books critical of Islam then any non expert can see the problem. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, but is there anything specific I can help you with? (Like a move/swap) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 02:42, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for running WP:GENFIXES. I saw the edits on some articles I was watching, and they were useful. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome @Bluerasberry! 🤗 I had been wanting to run it for a while, finally managed to get myself together. Now I can finally put a award up at the bots user page, yay! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan tag

Hi, I noticed you added orphan tag to article Kaushala Prasad Mishra . This article was newly created any way now the page is linked with Nehru Gram Bharati. Can you help me how to remove this tag? Thanks in advance!

-PKM Prabodha K Meher (talk) 09:12, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Prabodha K Meher (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Amazon Nova

Hello. I resubmitted without any changes because the previous reviewer was incorrect about the models not having been released yet. They have been, the last two references are from April and May 2025, and I believe sufficient to establish notability. I would really appreciate it you took a look at it again. Thank you. 117.195.138.126 (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey IP, based on the sources given, the models are still not yet announced? I don't see anything wrong in my decline? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first three models were released and available in December already. The Verge source cited second says: "There are three “understanding” models available now". 117.195.138.126 (talk) 09:35, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, my bad. I have resubmitted the draft and added a comment stating this. Please wait for another reviewer. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 09:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Does the Alana Felisberto page need any touch-ups?

Friend. Alana Felisberto is a Brazilian fashion model who has developed an international career, appearing in runway shows for brands such as Fendi, Oscar de la Renta, and Bottega Veneta. She has also featured in advertising campaigns for Victoria’s Secret and LaQuan Smith, becoming the first Brazilian model to lead a campaign for the latter. Her editorial work includes appearances in publications such as Vogue Mexico and Harper’s Bazaar. Coverage in reliable, independent sources suggests that she meets the notability guidelines for fashion models.

Vitorgpl4 (talk) 15:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alana_Felisberto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitorgpl4 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted my decline. Please wait for another reviewer. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About Why Love

Hello I noticed you just accepted this article at AFC, but it seams to be still unreviewed/patrolled, maybe you could help out. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 05:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chippla360:

Done this time, but generally you don't need to ask for it to be done. Since it was already AfC accepted, it will eventually be done quicker than other articles. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bunnypranav That’s cool, I Personally draftify the article, I Just became a reviewer at AFC so I wanted the last article I created to also pass through a review process instead of leaving it on mainspace, also I wanted it evaluated by other editors. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 05:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:00, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BunnysBot: "4th of July" is not an error

Regarding this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Redlands,_California&diff=prev&oldid=1293353794

"4th of July" is idiomatic and correct in American English, referring to Independence Day. "4 July" is not. Wanderer V8 (talk) 11:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the mistake, the bot seems to not have caught it. Thanks for fixing it! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The bot is breaking pie charts

@Bunnypranav: Your bot is breaking some pie charts, like on Special:Diff/1293565976. I'm tagging Exoplanetaryscience, who created that chart, and who seems to have used a workaround for the pie chart widget to function correctly that the bot isn't fond of. Renerpho (talk) 12:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Ennomos family, the bot is engaged in an edit war. I've also reverted it on Eurybates family, Hilda family, Hektor family. Renerpho (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Renerpho, sorry for the issues. This is caused as the bot is removing links to the page itself, which is expected behaviour. Unfortunately, this also seems to be breaking the pie charts. Thanks for all the reverts! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bunnypranav: You're welcome. I hope you can do something about it? Renerpho (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Ideally the page should not link to itself, that is the root cause (though I am not sure if/how that is possible with the charts). Since I am not running my own code, but this is in fact just Wikipedia:GENFIXES, one would need to update AWB code to add an exemption for the charts. For now, I can stop the bot running on the bot on CW Error #48, which detects a page linking itself. I would really appreciate if you and Exoplanetaryscience can find a better workaround. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bunnypranav: I've just looked at Module:Chart, trying to work around the issue. For the chart to be displayed as intended -- that is, with wikilinks being displayed to some entries in the legend --, one must specify a link for every entry. For those entries that don't need a wikilink, the article itself is linked, which the module (correctly) interprets to display no link at all. This may be a design flaw, an oversight, which should be reported on Module talk:Chart; or a bug, in which case it should go to WP:PHAB.

In the mean time, I see no better workaround with how the module works right now. I believe this is basically the intended way. Renerpho (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Renerpho What about Special:Diff/1294096389? I just removed :: and following text. Taken from this particular section of Module:Chart. Granted, now that section links to Ennomos_family#noSuchAnchor, but I don't think that is a big issue. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I think that might actually work, and be easy to do. @Exoplanetaryscience: When you've had time to collect all the articles that are affected, you can implement that fix? Otherwise you know where to reach me, give me the list and I'll do it. Renerpho (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the pages in this genre may be found at Category:Asteroid groups and families which are also in Special:WhatLinksHere/Module:Chart. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's such a stupidly simple fix, it's actually funny. Renerpho (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]