User talk:Grnrchst

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 Online events: New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024 Announcements from other communities Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025 Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 Tip of the month: Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Gren's 2024 round-up

I figured it'd be fun to have a wee look over the progress I've made this year and give some of my thoughts on it. I'm typing this on nine fingers, as yesterday I underestimated how sharp a new kitchen knife was and injured myself. So bare with me if there's some typos. 2024 marked my fifth year on Wikipedia, and my second or third year of serious work on the project. This year was something of a turning point for me, as stresses in my personal life, pride in my work here and burnout with overwork combined together into some quite messy months. This will not be an exhaustive dive into my work this year, just the parts I think are most worth revisiting.

January

My year started off with some boring bureaucratic work, but I managed to get quite a few articles written and expanded in January. I went down a rabbit hole reading about Carlo Cafiero; I had intended to just perform a quick stub-expansion, but found him interesting enough to really go at it during the first weeks of the year. A new standing desk helped a lot with this. Something similar also ended up happening with Hatta Shūzō and Alexander Atabekian, I even ended up digging into Russian sources to find out more about the latter. For the "M/N" month of Women in Red, I created quite a few articles: I translated an article about The Two Marias, who I had heard about from Galician family members (they referred to them as a euphemism whenever they saw people in brightly-coloured clothes); I wrote about Mariola Sirakova, finding even that wee dive into Bulgarian anti-fascism to be fascinating; Mariia Vetrova, a fascinating Narodnik activist whose self-immolation left a much deeper impact on Russian and Ukrainian revolutionary politics than English language histories care to discuss; Marie Vuillemin, a key woman member of the Bonnot gang who amazingly managed to get acquitted due to prevailing gender stereotypes of the time. I also wrote about several other Narodnik women, including Maria Leshern von Herzfeld (who broke Peter Kropotkin out of prison), and Nadia Smyrnytska and Maria Kalyuzhnaya, who took their lives to expose the harsh conditions of a Russian Imperial prison.

February

As February is Black History Month in North America, I took some time to write about some women from Africa and the African diaspora. I wrote a bit about JoNina Abron-Ervin, who was quite the prominent member of the Black Panther Party during its women-led years, took part in many of its most impactful programs, and ended up going onto be an elder in the American anti-racist movement and in Black anarchism. I also wrote about Tchinda Andrade, the first out trans woman in Cape Verde, who was quite inspiring in how she managed to affect cultural perceptions of LGBT people in her country (having written about her earlier in the year, I was heartbroken to find out she died last month). This month also marked a personal milestone for me, as my article on Nestor Makhno was the featured article on the front page on 24 February 2024. I was very proud of getting it to this point, as this article was my first good article (thanks to a thorough review by UnknownVolin). I feel like I learnt a lot in writing and improving this article, to such an extent that I'm honestly a little embarrassed by all the work I did before it. Writing about Makhno really taught me how to write a biography and the lessons I learnt from it have been applied going forward over the past couple years. This led me into a peer review for Gaetano Bresci, which I expect to be the next article I submit for FAC. I also wrote about another assassin, Dmitrii Bogrov, at the end of the month.

March

March was what started my foray into writing about anarcho-syndicalism. I wrote a bit about the German-Swedish syndicalist Helmut Rüdiger, who despite not having an article on English Wikipedia until then, might have been one of the most influential figures on the post-war syndicalist movement. I then wrote about Fernand Pelloutier, arguably one of the first anarcho-syndicalists, who founded the organisation that later became the French CGT. His example was a warning to me, as he died at a young age, in part due to overwork. This was also the month I got the article on Camilo Cienfuegos to GA, thanks to a very helpful review. Reading about Cienfuegos was a delight, as he was one of those historical personalities who really leaps off the page as you're reading about him. I also got the article on Olga Taratuta to GA, giving the Babushka of Ukrainian anarchism a biography I hope lives up to how interesting a figure she was. For Women in Red's "P/R" month, I wrote about Pola Roupa, who was one of those modern Greek anarchist militants whose story reads like something from a novel (many such cases), as well as Rosa Laviña. For the GAN backlog drive, I also reviewed several articles, including one on the transitional president of the Central African Republic Catherine Samba-Panza and one on the Cranberries song "Zombie" (one of my all-time favourite grunge songs). This month, I also finally broke and put together a user page, collecting some of my best work together in one place.

April

Kicking off April fools day, I had myself a bit of fun writing an article on Killing baby Hitler. My aim with this was to see if I could write a comprehensive article about a ridiculous subject in Wikipedia's characteristic dry, neutral tone. I think I succeeded, maybe too well, as the article now receives more than 100 daily average page views and some of my friends think it's my best article... Thanks to a review from asilvering, I got the article on Joseph Dejacque, the father of political libertarianism, to GA. It was particularly interesting to me that one of the most influential figures of early anarchism does not have a single photograph of him floating around. For Wikimedia's Romani week, I wrote about Mariano R. Vázquez, the General Secretary of the CNT during the Spanish Civil War, and Helios Gómez, a graphic artist. I'd heard much about Marianet, mostly from sources that despised him, so it was interesting reading the other side of the story and getting a more three-dimensional picture of his character and motivations. For Women in Red's "S/T" month, I wrote about Seta Kabranian-Melkonian, Soledad Real, Faina Stavskaya, Teresa Torrelles, Nelly Trumel, and the sisters Evgeniia, Maria and Nadezhda Subbotina (and their mother Sofya). This month, a friend asking me about the history of socialism in Kazakhstan sent me down a rabbit hole that resulted in me writing an article about the Ush Zhuz, a party that advocated for pan-Turkist socialism (a combination I didn't even know existed). Later in the month, I did some work expanding the articles about Green anarchism (although I soon lost interest as the literature was too US-centric for my liking), Homage to Catalonia (a book I have a mixed relationship with due to its status in modern anglophone literature on the civil war), and Christapor Mikaelian (who I was happy to read more about, having only known the cliffnotes about him previously). In celebration of 50 years since the Portuguese Revolution, I also wrote about the Portuguese anti-fascists Germinal de Sousa and Mário Castelhano, the latter of whom left a huge impression due to his dedication to fighting fascism in his country.

May

In May, I rounded out my research on Voltairine de Cleyre, having thoroughly familiarised myself with her life over the preceding month thanks to Paul Avrich's stellar biography. To say I was fascinated with her would be an understatement, as her aesthetic yet generous personality led to many an interesting encounter during her short life. Through her, I expanded on a number of related biographies, notably that on Dyer Lum, which I had felt responsible for after getting it demoted from GA status earlier that year. This was also the month I was introduced to the Constitution Protection Region of Southern Fujian, after a colleague translated the article from the Chinese Wikipedia. I tried to expand it to the best of my ability, leading me into research on this intriguing oddity of the warlord era, which could ironically be described as a military dictatorship with anarchist characteristics. This month, one of the embarrassing pre-Makhno articles I had written came back to haunt me, when the notoriously bad history of Paradox games drew from one of the first articles I had compiled (cobbled together from unsourced mythology on other language Wikipedias). I spent the weekend, which I had hoped to use to relax, rewriting this article from the bottom-up. Thankfully, what is now the article on the Frisian freedom, written by a more experienced Gren, is I think a lot more accurate and informative. I could certainly add more to it, but at least now I'm more confident it's not misinformation. This experience made me very wary of the power we have as Wikipedia writers to influence popular perception of history.

June

In June, I coordinated Women in Green's "Back in Time" event, which aimed to improve our coverage of women's history and address issues of recentism. First I put together an article about Sophie Kropotkin, someone I felt I needed to write about after seeing one too many male historians refer to her simply as "the wife", but whose own contributions to biology and revolutionary history merit discussion. I then moved forward with an article on María Pacheco, who I had first been introduced to when watching a documentary about the Comuneros. I found it incredible that a woman could achieve such a high status in the early modern period, as a revolutionary leader no less. I then wrote about Wong Sau Ying, whose story hooked me the moment I found out she had caused a moral panic among British colonists over the bob haircut. I used to have that haircut, so I took some interest in this factoid, leading to it being used in the article's DYK feature. I then wrote about another bobbed-hair woman, Mochizuki Yuriko, although I was unable to complete it as I did not have access to a source that talks a lot about her. I also wrote about Eva X Moberg, whose activism I had heard about from a Bosnian pal. Then I went on to write about Cécile Fatiman, an early leader of the Haitian Revolution who often gets left out of the androcentric histories. I knew very little about Haitian voodoo before this, so reading about it through the work of this influential priestess expanded my knowledge in exactly the way I had hoped this event would contribute to. Later I wrote about Quilago, who left quite the mark in Ecuadorian nationalist historiography. I also very much enjoyed reviewing Reidgreg's article on Dorothy Dworkin, who was one of those amazing historical figures that undeniably left the world better off through her presence in it. Aside from women's articles, I ended up compiling news about the 2024 Nigerian general strike, which was one of the largest strike actions in contemporary Nigerian history, and began writing about the SAC Syndikalisterna, Sweden's foremost syndicalist union. Following on from some work I started in February, I then expanded the article on Black anarchism; this article could still do with some more work, but I think it's at a better place now.

July

July was a down month for me, as stress from my personal life and burnout after several months of hard work forced me to take a break. Most of my contributions this month were focused on cleanup and aren't much fun to talk about. Towards the end of the month, I ended up working more on the article about FEJUVE, a Bolivian organisation of neighbourhood councils which I had felt needed more work for some months. It is definitely more complete now, but could still do with updates from the past decade. I then wrote a bit about the International Association, which was one of the international workers' organisations that preceded the so-called "First International", and continued my work on anarcho-syndicalism, expanding the articles on the Italian Syndicalist Union, Norwegian Syndicalist Federation and General Confederation of Labour. The former and the latter are two I would like to write more about in future. Unfortunately I ended up throwing a bunch of work away after realising another organisation I was writing about was not notable (just because you can get five people together into a room and say you want revolution, does not make you relevant enough for a Wikipedia article).

August

August was a wonderful time for writing, as a bunch of incredible songs were released over the brat summer that had me bouncing in my chair as I did research. This month I wrote about the Danish Trade Union Opposition Federation, a union I'd only read about in passing but which left quite the mark on radical trade unionism in 1910s Copenhagen (even attacking the Stock Exchange at one point). A review of the article on Marianet by Rollinginhisgrave helped substantially to reign in some of the neutrality issues that made its way in, as I clumsily attempted to balance the positive and negative views on him. This review really reminded me of just how important our review process is, and what that green button really means for an article. I then got very confused after I discovered that this "Syndicalist Defense Committee" I was reading about was actually two different, unrelated organisations; the 1915 organisation being an anti-war grouping of the CGT and the 1922 organisation being an anti-authoritarian grouping of the CGTU. After sorting out which was which and writing two separate articles, I left very frustrated by reading about French trade unionists infighting over 100 years ago. In order to counter this upset, I then wrote about the Portuguese National Workers' Union, which was formed with the explicit intention of mending a sectarian dispute. I also wrote a bit about the modern Solidarity Federation and the Paraguayan Regional Workers' Federation.

September

If reading about French trade unionists infighting in the 1910s and 1920s frustrated me, reading about the Confédération Générale du Travail-Syndicaliste Révolutionnaire took the cake. I felt weird inserting various historians' negative opinions about it into the Wikipedia article, as it could breach neutrality policy, but the historical consensus on the CGT-SR was nothing short of damning. I'm sure a review could help neutralise this a bit more, but wow I have never seen so many historians of different perspectives united on hating a long-defunct organisation. Frustrated with the androcentrism of many labour historians I was reading, I returned to writing about women. Women in Red was doing articles about people from islands, so I contributed articles on the Cuban revolutionaries Martina Pierra de Poo and Rosa Castellanos, the Azorean anti-fascist Sacuntala de Miranda, the Corsican communists Angèle Chevrin and Emma Choury, the Haitian feminists Marie-Laurence Josselyn Lassègue and Gabrielle Hyacinthe, the Cape Verdean anti-colonialist Helena Lopes da Silva, and the indigenous Guanche rulers Abenchara and Guayarmina. The latter got me more interested in Canarian history, so I ended up looking into the Canarian nationalist leader Secundino Delgado, whose views taught me a lot about a nationalist movement that is relatively marginal but no less important to modern Spain. I also wrote about the free love theorists Sada Bailey Fowler and Nella Giacomelli, who I had seen pop up elsewhere. Towards the end of the month, I wrote a bit about the modern history of the Confederación Nacional del Trabajo, which has unfortunately been marked by a number of contentious splits. The month was rounded out with a review of the Voltairine de Cleyre article by Edwininlondon, which helped me to no end to trim down the fluff and unnecessary sections of the article. This review was a helpful reminder of a quote I always try to remember when writing longer articles: "It seems that perfection is attained not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to remove." (Antoine de Saint Exupéry) {Yes I know this round-up is too long} The article is now looking much better, and I was delighted to hear from a colleague that it might soon be ready for FAC. I ended the month by writing an article on Manuela Sancho, one of the women who gained fame for participating in the defense of Zaragoza during the French invasion.

October

In October, I co-coordinated another event for Women in Green, this one focused on writing articles about women from different countries. With the Voltairine de Cleyre review taking up most of my time, I only had energy to write one article, that on Shadia Abu Ghazaleh, which was the first article I have contributed to on the Israel-Palestine conflict (a topic I usually avoid due to how contentious it can be). Instead of writing, I did a bit of reviewing: I reviewed ProfGray's article on Jex Blackmore (a person I heard about when they threatened President Trump in 2018); Nascar9919's article on "Who the Hell Is Edgar?" (one of my favourite songs of Eurovision 2023); and Vigilantcosmicpenguin's article on Abortion in Liberia (a subject I learnt a lot about through reviewing). Aside from this, I expanded the article on the Polish trade union Workers' Initiative.

November

November was a bad month in Spain, with horrific flooding hitting Valencia. The first week of the month, I dropped most of my other Wikipedia work to focus on covering it, together with other Wikipedians. With weather warnings in my own region keeping me inside, I felt it was the least I could do. This month we also received news about our colleagues being threatened by an Indian media conglomerate. This was a distressing process that caused great worry among many of us that followed the case, as it could lead to a chilling effect on our work. The case is still ongoing, with threats against Wikipedia editors and the Wikimedia Foundation continuing. We were able to coordinate some minor actions, but it wasn't enough to stop such attacks against our freedom of speech/the press. We still need to push back against it. This was a difficult month, to say the least.

December

The previous month, I began work on the research project that is now taking up most of my time: writing about the Spanish revolutionary Buenaventura Durruti. I wrote a lot about his whirlwind of activism during the 1920s, including his bank robberies and assassination attempts in Los Justicieros, Los Solidarios and Los Errantes. His personality is another that really leaps off the page, so he has been very interesting to write about. Few other people could have "after briefly stopping in Cuba for a quick bank robbery" written into their biography. I then went on to write about the various insurrections he led as part of the Nosotros group in the early 1930s, including in January 1932, January 1933 and December 1933. These were events I previously knew little about, so I enjoyed getting the backstory to the 1936 Revolution; turns out, it was only as successful as it was because they learnt how not to organise a revolution three times in a row. Continuing with stub expansion, I also wrote about the Liceu bombing, a horrific terrorist attack that shook me to read about. I then did a bit more work on the Paraguayan trade union movement, writing about Rafael Barrett and the Regional Workers' Center of Paraguay, before taking some time off for the solstice. Before I left, I was delighted to hear that Women in Red had finally achieved its long-sought goal of 20% of biographies being about women. This project is one that fills me with joy to contribute to, so I was stunned to hear we had reached a milestone people were talking about when I first started contributing. When I told a family member about the project, I said we hoped to soon reach 20%, then maybe 25% and hopefully some day... I was about to say 50%, but she cut me off and said "60%". Wouldn't that be something.

To conclude

Contributing to Wikipedia this year has been a blast. I have learnt so much from this process, in writing, reviewing and being reviewed. There have been some difficulties along the way, particularly in the month of November, as well as some burnout I experienced during the summer. This year I also caught online "content creators" plagiarising my work here on no less than 3 separate occasions (just that I know of). But none of this has discouraged me. I still value the work I and everyone else does here. I think Wikipedia is one of the few shining beacons of positivity that still remain on the internet, and I plan to keep contributing to it as long as I can. This year, I spent some time watching videos by the YouTuber William C. Fox, and there's something he says in some of his videos that always gets to me: whenever he cites Wikipedia, he cites it with the description "Wikipedia, the greatest work of intellectual altruism in human history". This reassures me that, no matter what adversity I or others may face here, what we're doing here is something very special. Peace and love to all of you in the new year, I look forward to us working together again soon. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

---

• Gren, your work this year has been phenomenal. Surely by now you're in the annals of English Wikipedia contributors, and you're certainly one of my favorites to read. I love checking for your new submissions, which are remarkably prolific and high quality, all while drawing from the most challenging of translated and print sources. (You're also so easy to work with, which makes collaborating even better.) Wishing you all the best in 2025!

Also what was the Paradox game? czar 15:13, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

@Czar: Thank you so much for the kind words! I really enjoy working with you as well! As for the Paradox game, if I recall correctly, it was a preview image from the upcoming Europa Universalis 5 which implied the Frisian Freedom was more of a coherent, centralised polity than it actually was (thanks to the nationalist myth-making I fell for five years ago). --Grnrchst (talk) 15:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

I can only echo czar here. Thanks for all your excellent work on the project. And thanks for giving me another great example for my "historians complaining about bad history in games need to start editing Wikipedia" file. -- asilvering (talk) 16:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

I am absolutely blown away by your output! Your contributions to anarchist history are truly Herculean and I am sure readers around the world appreciate all your efforts. UnknownVolin (talk) 20:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Liceu bombing

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Liceu bombing you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Liceu bombing

The article Liceu bombing you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Liceu bombing and Talk:Liceu bombing/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 01:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

2025 Update from Women in Green

Hello Grnrchst:

2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!

For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!

This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!

Grnrchst (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Liceu bombing

The article Liceu bombing you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Liceu bombing for comments about the article, and Talk:Liceu bombing/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 02:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Los Solidarios

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Los Solidarios you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 09:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Los Solidarios

The article Los Solidarios you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Los Solidarios for comments about the article, and Talk:Los Solidarios/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 11:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Abdourahamane Tchiani.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Abdourahamane Tchiani.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alt Llobregat insurrection

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alt Llobregat insurrection you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 03:24, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Articles about people resisting national socialism in Germany

Hello Grnrchst, I noticed you translated the article Annedore Leber I wrote in the Spanish Wikipedia. If you are interested in people resisting national socialism in Germany, the German Resistance Memorial Center also has biografies in English:

• https://www.gdw-berlin.de/en/recess/biographies/index_of_persons/

If you are interested in translating other articles on the topic from the Spanish Wikipedia, here is a list of articles I wrote that are not found in the English Wikipedia yet:

• es:Margarete von Trotha
• es:Herbert Tschäpe
• es:Walter Uhlmann
• es:Max Urich
• es:Elli Voigt
• es:Fritz Voigt
• es:Ernst Vollert
• es:Alfons Maria Wachsmann
• es:Bebo Wager
• es:Siegfried Wagner (militante en la resistencia)
• es:Helmuth Warnke
• es:Walter Winter
• es:Carl Wentzel already exists in the English Wikipedia, but is only a stub.
• es:Max Westphal has a namesake in the English Wikipedia, a tennis player, but doesn't have an article, yet.
• es:Oswald Wiersich
• es:Hannelore Willbrandt
• es:Frida Winkler
• es:Fritz Wulfert
• es:Hans Winkler (miembro de la resistencia alemana al nazismo) has a namesake in the English Wikipedia, a botanist, but doesn't have an article, yet.
• es:Karl Zimmet
• es:Edith Wolff
• es:Botho von Wussow
• es:Irene Yorck von Wartenburg
• es:Aenne Saefkow

Greetings, --Margo92 (talk) 17:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

@Margo92: Thanks so much for compiling this list for me, and letting me know about the Memorial Center's English biographies. I'll definitely be looking further into this. Thanks again! --Grnrchst (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

You are welcome! --Margo92 (talk) 17:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Liceu bombing

On 20 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Liceu bombing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that six innocent people were executed for the Liceu bombing (pictured), despite Santiago Salvador confessing that he was the sole perpetrator? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Liceu bombing. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Liceu bombing), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,570 views (1,047.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alt Llobregat insurrection

The article Alt Llobregat insurrection you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alt Llobregat insurrection for comments about the article, and Talk:Alt Llobregat insurrection/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 12:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2025

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Green Armies

Hi, what was the problem with the a.k.a. here? I thought it was helpful because of the similarity in the names, green army/black army. BobFromBrockley (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

@Bobfrombrockley: "Black Army" is not a commonly used name for the RIAU in either scholarly literature nor the primary sources, so saying it's "often called" that is just inaccurate. Until it caught on in online anarchist circles, the term "Black Army" was only really used by Victor Serge and sources citing him. As a peasant-based army, there's more than enough that the RIAU has in common with the green armies to not require drawing conceptual symmetry based on colour labels. --Grnrchst (talk) 22:48, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Ok fair enough. (It’s in wide usage now, but I’ll trust you if you say it wasn’t at that time.) BobFromBrockley (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

You can thank citogenesis for that. Before the Wikipedia article was created in 2006, the term "Black Army" was solely used by Serge and sources citing him.[1] "Insurgent Army" was always the most commonly used term in scholarly literature.[2] The term "Black Army" might have caught on among people that clearly needed to do more research,[3] but "Insurgent Army" is still by far the most common name in reliable scholarly sources.[4] Forgive me if I'm being overly strict about this, but this topic has been a magnet for citogenesis and Wikipedia-propagated neologisms and niche terminology. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:13, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

@Bobfrombrockley: It's also quite easy to go back through the primary sources and see none of them use the term "Black Army" (see Makhno, Volin and Arshinov). The term they all use is "Insurgent Army" (or the mistranslated "Insurrectionary Army"). I also checked Russian and Ukrainian sources on Google Scholar, and a similar pattern shows up in the scholarly literature in those languages: only two sources about the Makhnovists use the term "чёрная армия", both from the past decade;[5] and only one, published a couple years ago, uses the term "чорна армія".[6] Contrast this with "повстанческая армия"[7] and "повстанська армія".[8] Like the "Free Territory" neologism, it's just one of those things I feel the need to insist on, as I hold Wikipedia partially responsible for such niche terminology catching on. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much for this thorough and enriching reply. I was certain it was the term I encountered when I first heard of them in the 1990s, but probably that was via Serge and the main source I had access to then, Volin, didn't use it. I had no idea that the spread was because of this project! Best wishes, and thanks for your time. BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	The DYK hooks at Template:Did you know nominations/Los Justicieros made me chuckle. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 00:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the January 2025 GAN backlog drive

		The Minor Barnstar
		Your noteworthy contribution (3 points total) helped reduce the backlog by 185 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Los Solidarios

On 9 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Los Solidarios, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the anarchist group Los Solidarios assassinated the leader of the Catalan pistoleros, the governor of Biscay, and the archbishop of Zaragoza? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Los Solidarios. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Los Solidarios), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Alt Llobregat insurrection

On 19 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alt Llobregat insurrection, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Alt Llobregat insurrection took place without any looting or killing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alt Llobregat insurrection. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alt Llobregat insurrection), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2025

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: March editathons around the world Celebrate Women 2025 office hour series Tip of the month: You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing, and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks Moving the needle: 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

References

WikiCup 2025 March newsletter

The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. Unlike the round points in the main WikiCup table, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.

Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,168 round points, mainly from 4 featured articles and 4 good articles on old military history, in addition to an assortment of GA and FA reviews.
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, mainly from 2 FAs, 2 featured lists, 8 GAs, and 16 Did You Know articles mainly on historical topics.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions), with 866 round points from 20 GAs, 23 DYKs, and 2 In the News articles primarily about athletes.
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with 846 round points from 16 GAs about radio and TV stations, 45 GA reviews, and 3 DYKs.
• Hey man im josh (submissions), with 816 round points from 5 FLs about sports and Olympic topics, 46 FL reviews, 3 ITN articles, and a large number of bonus points.
• MaranoFan (submissions), with 815 round points primarily from 3 FAs and 1 GA about music, in addition to 9 article reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toward European Unity

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toward European Unity you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toward European Unity

The article Toward European Unity you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Toward European Unity for comments about the article, and Talk:Toward European Unity/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:25, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

"Makhnovist movement" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Makhnovist movement has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 13 § Makhnovist movement until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:42, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Toward European Unity

On 26 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Toward European Unity, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the essay "Toward European Unity" George Orwell presumed that one of the greatest obstacles to a federal Europe would be economic pressure by the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Toward European Unity. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Toward European Unity), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cielquiparle (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Women in Green's May 2025 edit-a-thon

Hello Grnrchst: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in May 2025!

Running from May 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a women's rights activist? Go for it. An Olympian gold medallist? Absolutely. A famous painting by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. We hope to see you there!

(You are receiving this message as you are on the Women in Green mailing list. If you wish to opt out of receiving future messages, feel free to remove yourself from the list.) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2025

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Business Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (Events facilitated by others): The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025 Tip of the month: When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT. Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited, it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name. Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women) 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Los Justicieros

On 1 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Los Justicieros, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Avengers attempted to assassinate Alfonso XIII, King of Spain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Los Justicieros. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Los Justicieros), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

SL93 (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 22,502 views (937.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Alejandro Finisterre

On 19 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alejandro Finisterre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alejandro Finisterre (pictured), the inventor of table football, threatened to blow up a plane with a bar of soap? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alejandro Finisterre. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alejandro Finisterre), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 26,928 views (1,122.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

A fun read! Great work. Panini! • 🥪 01:51, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Research Question

Hello! It's Spookyaki, from WiG. I am currently working on the article for Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza, which will hopefully be ready in time for the edit-a-thon in May. Right now I'm looking for a particular piece of information, which seems to be up your alley and that I wonder if you can assist me with. Specifically, it's about the Liberation Army of the South. Many sources (including Wikipedia) make offhanded mentions to the idea that these Zapatistas had some sort of ties to indigenous communities in Morelos. However, I cannot find any sources that explain this connection explicitly. It's a bit difficult to search for, because most search results discuss the modern Zapatistas, not the ones who were active during the Mexican Revolution. Would you happen to know of any sources that discuss this? Academic sources preferable, but I'll take what I can get at this point. If it helps, I'd like to insert the information something like this (you can also check my sandbox):

In late October 1911, at the invitation of her friends, Gutiérrez and her children traveled to Cuautla, Morelos to assist the Liberation Army of the South, commonly referred to as the Zapatistas. The Zapatistas, organized by Emiliano Zapata, called for the redistribution of land and wealth to the poor. [something explaining Zapatista ties to indigenous communities] After Madero's victory, the Zapatistas refused to disarm, frustrated with his unwillingness to prioritize land reform. Valles theorizes that Gutiérrez's decision to join the Zapatistas was motivated by a desire to reclaim her own Indigenous heritage amidst the ongoing exploitation of Indigenous people in Morelos.

Thank you! Spookyaki (talk) 20:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

@Spookyaki: Hey, thanks for pinging me about this. The Mexican Revolution isn't something I've done a lot of reading on, so I can't recommend anything off the top of my head about this, but I'll keep an eye out for any sources that might interest you! --Grnrchst (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Okay, sounds good, thanks! Spookyaki (talk) 22:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Good luck with the editathon!

Hey Grnrchst -- I'm going to be away travelling for the next couple of weeks (off to catch my flight this morning!), so I just wanted to say good luck with the WiG editathon kickoff. I've tidied up the old 20-minute assessments from the assessments page, but you'll still need to remove the "closed" sign once the event starts. Have fun, and I'll see if I can jump in after I get back May 9th. :-) Alanna the Brave (talk) 11:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

@Alanna the Brave: Thanks! Safe travels, hope you have a nice trip! --Grnrchst (talk) 11:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 May newsletter

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,233 round points from 24 good articles, 28 Did you know articles, and one In the news nomination, mainly about athletes and politicians
• Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 1,127 round points, almost entirely from two high-multiplier featured articles on Black Widow (Natasha Romanova) and Grace Coolidge, in addition to two GAs and two reviews
• History6042 (submissions) with 1,088 round points from four featured lists about Michelin-starred restaurants, nine good articles and a good topic mostly on Olympic-related subjects, seven ITN articles, and dozens of reviews
• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,085 round points from three FAs, one GA, and four DYKs on military history, as well as 18 reviews
• Arconning (submissions) with 887 round points, mostly from four FLs, six GAs, and seven DYKs on Olympic topics, along with more than two dozen reviews

In addition, we would like to recognize Generalissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2025

Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338 Online events: New: Revolutionary women | Alphabet run I & J Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (events facilitated by others): WikiProject Women in Green - a Good Article editathon from 1-31 May 2025 Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period! 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women) Tip of the month: Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Promotion of Gaetano Bresci

Congratulations, Grnrchst! The article you nominated, Gaetano Bresci, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Nice one! Mujinga (talk) 08:42, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Rosal Column

On 4 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rosal Column, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the Spanish Civil War, when the government fled the coming siege of Madrid, the Rosal Column detained several government ministers and accused them of cowardice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosal Column. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rosal Column), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Gentlemen & Players

Hello, and thank you for your careful assessment of Gentlemen & Players: I'd been making some changes to the tone but had completely missed the copyvio (tbf, I wasn't aware of the existence of the tool:). I'd like to rewrite the Plot section from scratch: looking into their history, it looks like the original creator of the page hasn't been active recently. Could I do that in my sandbox, and ask you to approve it, please, or should I ask my mentor instead? I'm still finding my feet on here, so if that's the wrong way to do it, feel free to tell me so. ArthurTheGardener (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

@ArthurTheGardener: You can do pretty much anything in your sandbox, that's why it's a sandbox! If you already have a GA mentor then it'd definitely be good to ask them about your changes, but I can always give a second pair of eyes if need be. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:55, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Marcelino Massana

On 10 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marcelino Massana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the anti-Francoist guerrilla Marcelino Massana pranked the Civil Guard captain who was trying to kill him by paying for his coffee? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marcelino Massana. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marcelino Massana), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Agustín Remiro

On 12 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Agustín Remiro, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Spanish anarchist Agustín Remiro worked as a foreign agent for MI6? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agustín Remiro. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Agustín Remiro), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

The World Destubathon

You are invited to participate in The World Destubathon. It's currently planned for June 16-July 13, partly due to me having hayfever during that period and not wanting to run it throughout July or August in the hotter summer and will be run then unless multiple editors object. There is currently $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. As 250 countries and entities is too much to patrol, entries will be by user, but there is $500 going into prizes for editors covering the most countries. Sign up if interested! ♦ Dr. Blofeld

Thanks for the invite! I'd be delighted to participate. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Your removal of the stub tabs for the Freedom Press Defence Committee

I much appreciate your edit. (From, an editor who is recovering from a cut to one of his fingers which he sustained a few days ago while cleaning his kitchen).John Desmond (talk) 14:33, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

@John Desmond: No bother! Thanks so much for your work on that article. I hope your cut heals up soon! --Grnrchst (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2025

Women in Red | June 2025, Vol 11, Issue 6, Nos. 326, 327, 339, 340 Online events: New: LGBTQ+ | Alphabet run K & L Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Who are the most overlooked and interesting Women in Red? We've no idea, but we're putting together our list of the 100 most interesting ex-Women in Red. We are creating the list to celebrate 10 years of Women in Red and we hope to present it at Wikimania. We are ignoring the obvious, so do you have a name or subject we should consider? Can you suggest a DYK style hook? If you are shy about editing that page, you are welcome to add ideas and comments on the talk page. The World Destubathon, 16 June - 13 July, 2025 Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,492 articles during this period! 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women) 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% (2,061,363 bios; 414,126 women) Tip of the month: Every language Wikipedia has its own policies regarding notability and reliable sources. Before translating an article from one language Wikipedia into English Wikipedia, research the subject and verify that the translated article will meet English Wikipedia's policy requirements. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Thank you

Sincere thank you for your work on Kim Chwajin; he really deserved a great article and you delivered. If I can make a suggestion, Hong Beom-do is also very important and is in dire need of a rewrite. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for saying that! I'll definitely add Hong to the list, but it may have to wait, as I'm focused on a bunch of different other stuff. --Grnrchst (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

General references in stub articles

In single-sentence stubs like Anarchism (Woodcock book) with a full References section, any of those references can verify the book's topic, author, and release year, which is to say that those are General References. The {{no footnotes}} template is not necessary as there is no ambiguity over how the one-sentence article is sourced. Wanted to leave a note as you appear to be adding this template to a number of articles. czar 03:34, 1 June 2025 (UTC)