User talk:JacobTheRox

JacobTheRox edits with good faith and always tries to improve Wikipedia but sometimes makes mistakes. Please be kind!

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

A belated welcome!

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, JacobTheRox! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for making the Pope date format RFC

A date format for one article seems like a trivial thing but clearly there's some weight to it for many editors. Looking forward to the resolution. Thanks! Ymerazu (talk) 22:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s funny how such a minor issue is so polarizing. I think on one hand you have a group of people who are committed to following what they feel is a correct reading of MOS, while the others feel the subject is now of global importance and should use a date format used by most of the world. Celjski Grad (talk) 21:29, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I thought it would be more of a "fun" dispute where people understood that all outcomes are roughly acceptable if achieved with the right motivations, but it has turned into a battleground! Pretty funny. Hoping that a truly uninvolved and neutral closerwill make sense of it and that in doing so it won't lead to any further drama. Ymerazu (talk) 07:51, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the DRN submission

Regardless of the outcome, thanks for making the effort to keep this on the rails and guiding the issue through the dispute resolution system, and letting the system do its work as designed—it’s appreciated! Celjski Grad (talk) 21:26, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kelston toll road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alastair Stout

The article Alastair Stout has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While the other two actors of the trio have, to their names, two other projects each on stage/screen: this fellow isn't notable beyond this show and no substantial information can be gotten from what is currently out there. WP:TOOSOON.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]