User talk:JustMakeTheAccount

AFDs

Hello, JustMakeTheAccount,

Unless you have edited Wikipedia with other accounts (and if so, you should list them on your User page), you just have three weeks of editing experience on this project. That's not a lot of time to learn Wikipedia's dozens and dozens of rules and guidlines on notabiity and sourcing. I'd like to ask you to hold off nominating articles for deletion discussions until you have spent more time working on the project. What seems "unnotable" to you might be judged to easily meet GNG or BASIC standards of notability or NPROF, NCORP, NAUTHOR, NPOL or NSONG if you are looking at SNGs. This seems to have happened with several of your AFDs. Saying "No notability" as your nomination statement doesn't demonstrate you understand the variety of Wikipedia notability standards. It takes a lot of time to pick up knowledge for all of these differing systems for notability. You seem very confident but as a senior editor, I am recommending you hold off for a few more weeks or months until you are at least extended confirmed (if not longer).

If you have questions about our deletion processes or guidelines, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you for considering this request. And if you do have previous accounts, please include them on your User page. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:28, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not amend your comment after a long period of time as you have done here. It confuses readers. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 02:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I second everything Liz is saying to you here. Your conduct, both on your poor AFD rationales and rude interactions with others, is very concerning to me. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. You've got to be able to work with others. I strongly urge you to find a better take away from this than your initial comment above. Sergecross73 msg me 03:31, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even look at the history of my talk page? Look at what happened. The commenter above made a comment, and then a day later, amended it to read something else. That is poor behavior, and that poor behavior is what I was commenting on. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 03:32, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but that should absolutely not be your only take away from that message. Regardless of any of that, she's making good points you should be listening to. Sergecross73 msg me 03:44, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Might I add that this editor should also not be repeatedly restoring edits against consensus, making false allegations of harassment, or stalking the edits of editors they're engaged in disagreements with ... ? Popcornfud (talk) 03:48, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How did you include links in your comment like that? JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 03:50, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Popcornfud makes very good points too. Please listen to them rather than continually trying to change the subject. Sergecross73 msg me 04:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have not tried to change any subject. I asked the user about the process of him including links within a sentence, because to me it seems like an inordinate amount of work. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you have not acknowledged a single thing Liz, Popcorn, or myself have actually said to you so far. Do you understand what is being said to you? Sergecross73 msg me 13:21, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask you, is it not the case that what you sa JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 14:48, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I'm not following what you're saying or asking in that last comment. Sergecross73 msg me 15:55, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like my comment was intentionally truncated. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 16:21, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by that, the comment appears to be exactly what you posted yourself. Regardless, is there a reason you continue to avoid addressing literally anything asked of you? Sergecross73 msg me 16:34, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. that's odd. and maybe there is. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 17:14, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Any more WP:POINT violations and your account will be blocked from editing. Sergecross73 msg me 02:22, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only thing I'm disrupting is your brain, serge. Only thing. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 02:28, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You are blocked from editing per this edit. There's no excuse for this silliness, let alone your refusal to engage in any discussion on your own conduct. Let me know when you're ready to talk seriously. You're blocked in the meantime. Sergecross73 msg me 02:32, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Real progress of Wikipedia is stopped while you struggle to maintain pace. JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 02:35, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

true dat Oldtownboi249 (talk) 19:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HaptX for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HaptX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HaptX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 12:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]