-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
feat: allow passing validation set explicitly #245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good, thanks for the PR. I can see that you didn't run pre-commit on this. Could you make the necessary changes and then run pre-commit before you commit?
sorry, i never used pre-commit before, i installed it and ran it before the last commit i pushed but it doesn't seem to have done anything?
not sure what is supposed to happen here |
No worries, I can show you. From your output, I see you haven't staged the files, or have already pushed them. You can run |
i don't think my pycharm install is liking pre-commit... I can have a look later if that is a blocker for the PR and I'll redo it from scratch without pycharm in the mix The other requested changes have been pushed |
@JarbasAl , I added some more validation and tests, and ran the pre-commit. The tests are failing because of some unrelated transformers issue. Feel free to take a look if you like the changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JarbasAl Looks good, thanks for the contribution!
The lates commits are to fix the failing CI |
awesome, thanks for wrapping this up! awesome project and super responsive and helpful devs, what else could anyone ask for :) |
i have been experimenting with model2vec and it is great! kudos for the awesome work
I wanted to use my own validation set but that was not exposed, this PR simply adds optional arguments to the
fit
method to allow passing your own validation data