Skip to content

Backport of Docs: Update to Reflect Client Count Changes into release/1.20.x #30976

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release/1.20.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hc-github-team-secure-vault-core
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport

This PR is auto-generated from #30798 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label backport/1.20.x.

The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.


Description

Docs for recent client count updates found in the following PRs: #30678, #30506, #30488 and #30506.

  • Screenshots have been updated to reflect the updates to the date picker + charts
  • Screenshot has been added to new attribution table
  • Documentation regarding the removed namespace attribution and mount attribution charts has been removed
  • Updated usage-metrics files to client-usage for clarity.

TODO only if you're a HashiCorp employee

  • Backport Labels: If this fix needs to be backported, use the appropriate backport/ label that matches the desired release branch. Note that in the CE repo, the latest release branch will look like backport/x.x.x, but older release branches will be backport/ent/x.x.x+ent.
    • LTS: If this fixes a critical security vulnerability or severity 1 bug, it will also need to be backported to the current LTS versions of Vault. To ensure this, use all available enterprise labels.
  • ENT Breakage: If this PR either 1) removes a public function OR 2) changes the signature
    of a public function, even if that change is in a CE file, double check that
    applying the patch for this PR to the ENT repo and running tests doesn't
    break any tests. Sometimes ENT only tests rely on public functions in CE
    files.
  • Jira: If this change has an associated Jira, it's referenced either
    in the PR description, commit message, or branch name.
  • RFC: If this change has an associated RFC, please link it in the description.
  • ENT PR: If this change has an associated ENT PR, please link it in the
    description. Also, make sure the changelog is in this PR, not in your ENT PR.

Overview of commits

Copy link

Build Results:
All builds succeeded! ✅

Copy link

CI Results:
All Go tests succeeded! ✅

Copy link

@RubenSandwich RubenSandwich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚢

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants