Refactor return statement style in optuna/storages/_rdb/models.py for consistency among the codebase
#6143
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nabenabe0928
changed the title
optuna/storages/_rdb/models.py for consistency among the codebase
nabenabe0928
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2025
nabenabe0928
added
the
code-fix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
This PR updates the return statement formatting in
optuna/storages/_rdb/models.pyto align with Optuna's code style, which prefersreturn a, boverreturn (a, b)for returning tuples.Changes