- Sean Corfield, lead
- Ben Forta, Adobe
- SanJeev Kumar, Adobe
- Gert Franz, Railo
- Ray Camden
- Rob Brooks-Bilson
As you can see, Adobe has just two positions on the committee, so this is intended to be community-driven, not Adobe-driven.
When someone asked why no one from other CFML engine vendors was listed, Ben explained (as carefully as he could) that the committee was made up of people who have shown an interest in working together on CFML for the benefit of the community. This issue is going to continue to be hotly debated, I'm sure, which is why I mention it up front instead of waiting for someone to ask in a comment!
I think this will be a great thing moving forward...
Both Railo and openBD are open source, mature engines and have communities that are working towards the goal of opening up CFML to the masses.
If only all the ego maniacs could just hug, make up and then get this CFML roadtrain moving. CF devs would be ruling the world in no time :D
:P Just kidding.
Looking forward to more news and the debate.
I'll be chiming in on some ideas as well since ahem, I asked on the internal beta forums for expansion of cfscript... and people jumped on me. :D
Good news all around!
There are plenty of times when I try to move code written on one to another only system only to become frustrated trying to debug it (hint: Railo is the most forgiving - accepting almost anything thrown at it, bluedragon is the most finicky). I am sure there are plenty of other developers who are in similar positions as I am, and have to support clients in different CFML engines. I understand there has been a lot of bad blood between adobe and NA, but I think it would be wise to include at least one person from the openBD group.
What about Matt Woodward - He has done a huge amount of work expanding the community, writing a great framework, multiple open source projects, and making the CF Podcast for so long in addition to frequent presentations, blog posts, and speaker sessions. I think he would be the perfect person to fill out this CFML advisory board.
I already preferred Railo to bluedragon, and now that it is FOSS, for me the decision is pretty easy. But there are other circumstances where I need to do .net integration and BD.net is the only way (I already have one client on bd.net), so I still have a vested interest in seeing someone from openBD at the table.
1) I Highly doubt that, in light of current sentiment between NA and Adobe, this would be asking for too much.
2) Any feedback that someone from openBD received would go back to the openBD group eventually trickle back up to NA & therefore bd.net.
The fact that he is on the OpenBD steering committee just so happens to be a side benefit so that each major engine is well represented.
As the leader of this Advisory panel you should be neutral to any engine. The fact that you have a your sides with Alan, does not help this at all. I understand you.
But, as many others have mentioned, if you, Railo and Adobe are serious about it, then someone from our OpenBD Steering Committee has to be on the board. Only this, will give the community, a community CFML standard.
You know where I am standing, you also know some of the other SC folks. I know as a matter of fact, that Gert also wants to have someone of the OpenBD SC on board. Please, let us not but any personal stuff come in between for the good of the community.
Matt and myself have been assigned by the OpenBD SC to take care of the CFML language standards. We are the ones that are taking this back to the project.
Please reconsider and talk to us.
Kind Regards, Nitai
@Sean - You are correct about the bd.net, but there were two thoughts I had while writing that.
1) I **believe**, in light of current sentiment between NA and Adobe, this would be asking for too much.
2) Any feedback that someone from openBD received would go back to the openBD group eventually trickle back up to NA & therefore bd.net.
I have no personal stake in whether OpenBD is involved nor any personal issues with members of the steering committee and I expect I'll have a beer with Alan next time we're in the same town :)
He already approached Adobe. We will see how they will react.
Fact remains, we, the OpenBD Steering Committee are an independent body. You have been on the SC, you know that NA has no say in what we do.
You only mean you will have a beer with Alan? Let's take that on at CFDevcon. I meet you at the bar :-)
As for New Atlanta, not only do I know that they have no say in OpenBD but *I* was the one pushing the steering committee to publicly distance themselves from NA. Alan's negative reaction to that pushing was part of why I left.
As for beers, yes, CFDevCon. And Alan will be in California before then and we may well get together for a beer...
Amen to that. Let's see in the future if that will hold up.
For now, I think it is the best to leave the past to the past and look into the future and how to bring the CFML together.
Having a standard will make developing apps to run on any engine much easier. Then as Gert said at SoTR, each engine can have it's own add-on features that make one more attractive than another depending on requirements.
This also gives us a great resource to prove to the pointy-haired-boss that "ColdFusion (sic) is dead" articles are nonsense.
I agree with much of the sentiment expressed here. In the long run it is in the best interests of all to cooperate honestly, fairly, and openly. And I hope we get there quickly.
I've posted some thoughts on the subject here:
http://www.forta.com/blog/index.cfm/2008/6/19/Thoughts-On-The-CFML-Language-Advisory-Committee
--- Ben
Seriously though, i do wish you success with this effort. For the record I have emailed both Ben and Gert personally, but as of yet no reply. I am not reading anything into that, it's show week, and their inboxes will be chock full of stuff. I do hope they get round to doing it.
As I have stated, i am the new kid on the CFML block here, and now that i have stepped into the community blogging world, I will make all attempts to reach out to those that want to learn more about we are doing at OpenBD.
I am indeed looking forward to some good healthy discussions and debate with people, and letting reasoned arguments shine through instead of all this political nonsense.
Looks like I will be in the bay area around August time Sean, and I am glad to read you still up for that beer/dinner.
Enjoy CFUnited.
Good to see you getting more involved with the CF community!
Just contact me again, I will of course answer...
Gert
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <[email protected]> (reason: 550 5.1.1 User unknown)
@Sean: LOL
Gert
Jun 20 21:09:02 muck sendmail[10765]: m5KK8wB7010763: to=<gert.franz *at* railo.ch>, delay=00:00:04, xdelay=00:00:04, mailer=esmtp, pri=125976, relay=decs1.uceprotect.com. [217.23.49.206], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Did we spool your Message to /dev/null or not :-), who knows?)
this is the 3rd email sent to you, so if this doesn't get to you, then i am caught in your spam filter somewhere! :(
Has there been any attempts to include them?
~Brad
Does anyone have more up to date experience with Smith? Has anyone been able to contact the development team recently?