Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Phosphatase specificity influences phosphorylation timing of CDK substrates during the cell cycle
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 November 2025

Phosphatase specificity influences phosphorylation timing of CDK substrates during the cell cycle

  • Theresa U. Zeisner  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2898-289X1 nAff4,
  • Tania Auchynnikava1,2,
  • Emma L. Roberts  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4167-64161 &
  • …
  • Paul Nurse  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9244-77871,3 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2025) Cite this article

  • 1277 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Mitosis
  • Phosphorylation

Abstract

Cell cycle events are ordered by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which phosphorylate hundreds of substrates. Multiple phosphatases oppose these CDK substrates, yet their collective role in regulating phosphorylation timing in vivo remains unclear. Here, we show that four phosphatases (PP2A-B55, PP2A-B56, CDC14, and PP1) each target distinct subsets of CDK substrate sites in vivo in fission yeast, influencing when phosphorylation occurs during G2 and mitosis. On average, sites dephosphorylated by CDC14 and PP2A-B56 are phosphorylated earlier during G2, followed by sites dephosphorylated by PP1 and PP2A-B55. This suggests that these phosphatases set different phosphorylation thresholds at the G2/M transition. Consistent with this, depleting PP2A-B55 or CDC14 accelerates mitotic onset, likely by advancing phosphorylation of their respective CDK substrates, suggesting these phosphorylation thresholds are important for regulating mitotic onset. Our findings establish in vivo phosphatase substrate specificity as a key factor regulating the timing of CDK substrate phosphorylation throughout the cell cycle.

Similar content being viewed by others

Phosphosite Scanning reveals a complex phosphorylation code underlying CDK-dependent activation of Hcm1

Article Open access 19 January 2023

Phosphate-binding pocket on cyclin B governs CDK substrate phosphorylation and mitotic timing

Article Open access 08 May 2025

Evolution of opposing regulatory interactions underlies the emergence of eukaryotic cell cycle checkpoints

Article Open access 27 May 2021

Data availability

All mass spectrometry data generated for this study have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with dataset identifier PXD060298, and sample names are listed in Supplementary Data 5. Mass spectrometry data for Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 10 can be found on PRIDE with dataset identifier PXD0035982. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Previously described custom scripts used to analyse fluorescent time-lapse data can be found at https://github.com/nkapadia27/Spatiotemporal-Orchestration-of-Mitosis66.

References

  1. Morgan, D. O. The Cell Cycle: Principles of Control. (New Science Press, 2007).

  2. Swaffer, M. P., Jones, A. W., Flynn, H. R., Snijders, A. P. & Nurse, P. CDK substrate phosphorylation and ordering the cell cycle. Cell 167, 1750–1761.e16 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basu, S., Greenwood, J., Jones, A. W. & Nurse, P. Core control principles of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Nature 607, 381–386 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gould, K. L. & Nurse, P. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the fission yeast cdc2+ protein kinase regulates entry into mitosis. Nature 342, 39–45 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Novak, B. & Tyson, J. J. Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. J. Cell Sci. 106, 1153–1168 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loog, M. & Morgan, D. O. Cyclin specificity in the phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase substrates. Nature 434, 104–108 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nasa, I. & Kettenbach, A. N. Coordination of protein kinase and phosphoprotein phosphatase activities in mitosis. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 6, 1–14 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nilsson, J. Protein phosphatases in the regulation of mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 218, 395–409 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray, C. H., Good, V. M., Tonks, N. K. & Barford, D. The structure of the cell cycle protein Cdc14 reveals a proline-directed protein phosphatase. EMBO J. 22, 3524–3535 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cundell, M. J. et al. A PP2A-B55 recognition signal controls substrate dephosphorylation kinetics during mitotic exit. J. Cell Biol. 214, 539–554 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kruse, T. et al. Mechanisms of site-specific dephosphorylation and kinase opposition imposed by PP2A regulatory subunits. EMBO J https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2019103695 (2020) .

  12. Hoermann, B. et al. Dissecting the sequence determinants for dephosphorylation by the catalytic subunits of phosphatases PP1 and PP2A. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Touati, S. A. et al. Cdc14 and PP2A phosphatases cooperate to shape phosphoproteome dynamics during mitotic exit. Cell Rep. 29, 2105–2119.e4 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Castilho, P. V., Williams, B. C., Mochida, S., Zhao, Y. & Goldberg, M. L. The M phase kinase greatwall (Gwl) promotes inactivation of PP2A/B55δ, a phosphatase directed against CDK phosphosites. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 4777–4789 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mochida, S., Ikeo, S., Gannon, J. & Hunt, T. Regulated activity of PP2A-B55δ is crucial for controlling entry into and exit from mitosis in xenopus egg extracts. EMBO J. 28, 2777–2785 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, J. Q. et al. PP1-mediated dephosphorylation of phosphoproteins at mitotic exit is controlled by inhibitor-1 and PP1 phosphorylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009 11, 644–651 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holder, J., Mohammed, S. & Barr, F. A. Ordered dephosphorylation initiated by the selective proteolysis of cyclin B drives mitotic exit. Elife 9, 1–33 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Uhlmann, F., Bouchoux, C. & López-Avilés, S. A quantitative model for cyclin-dependent kinase control of the cell cycle: revisited. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 366, 3572–3583 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Godfrey, M. et al. PP2ACdc55 phosphatase imposes ordered cell-cycle phosphorylation by opposing threonine phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 65, 393–402.e3 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Takacs, L., Gerontogianni, L., Quililan, K., Flynn, H. & Uhlmann, F. Evidence of substrate control of Cdk phosphorylation during the budding yeast cell cycle. Cell Rep 44, 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115534 (2025).

  21. Bishop, C. et al. A chemical switch for inhibitor-sensitive alleles of any protein kinase. Nature 408, 961–964 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Coudreuse, D. & Nurse, P. Driving the cell cycle with a minimal CDK control network. Nature 468, 1074–1080 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Songyang, Z. et al. Use of an oriented peptide library to determine the optimal substrates of protein kinases. Curr. Biol. 4, 973–982 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Watson, A. T., Hassell-Hart, S., Spencer, J. & Carr, A. M. Rice (Oryza sativa) tir1 and 5′adamantyl-iaa significantly improve the auxin-inducible degron system in schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes (Basel) 12, 10.3390/genes12060882 (2021).

  25. Zhang, X. R. et al. An improved auxin-inducible degron system for fission yeast. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 12, 10.1093/g3journal/jkab393 (2022).

  26. Bollen, M., Peti, W., Ragusa, M. J. & Beullens, M. The extended PP1 toolkit: Designed to create specificity. Trends Biochem Sci. 35, 450–458 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Partscht, P., Simon, A., Chen, N. P., Erhardt, S. & Schiebel, E. The HIPK2/CDC14B-MeCP2 axis enhances the spindle assembly checkpoint block by promoting cyclin B translation. Sci Adv. 9, 10.1093/g3journal/jkab393 (2023).

  28. Sharma, K. et al. Ultradeep Human Phosphoproteome Reveals a Distinct Regulatory Nature of Tyr and Ser/Thr-Based Signaling. Cell Rep. 8, 1583–1594 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Agostinis, P., Derua, R., Sarno, S., Goris, J. & Merlevede, W. Specificity of the polycation-stimulated (type-2A) and ATP, Mg-dependent (type-1) protein phosphatases toward substrates phosphorylated by P34cdc2 kinase. Eur. J. Biochem 205, 241–248 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koch, A., Krug, K., Pengelley, S., Macek, B. & Hauf, S. Mitotic substrates of the kinase aurora with roles in chromatin regulation identified through quantitative phosphoproteomics of fission yeast. Sci. Signal 4, 1–12 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Suzuki, K. et al. Identification of non-Ser/Thr-Pro consensus motifs for Cdk1 and their roles in mitotic regulation of C2H2 zinc finger proteins and Ect2. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–9 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson, J. L. et al. An atlas of substrate specificities for the human serine/threonine kinome. Nature 613, 759–766 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kettenbach, A. N. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics identifies substrates and functional modules of Aurora and Polo-like kinase activities in mitotic cells. Sci Signal 4, 10.1126/scisignal.2001497 (2011).

  34. Alexander, J. et al. Spatial exclusivity combined with positive and negative selection of phosphorylation motifs is the basis for context-dependent mitotic signaling. Sci Signal 4, 35–37 (2011).

  35. Lizcano, J. M. et al. Molecular basis for the substrate specificity of NIMA-related kinase-6 (NEK6). Evidence that NEK6 does not phosphorylate the hydrophobic motif of ribosomal S6 protein kinase and serum- and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 27839–27849 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mah, A. S. et al. Substrate specificity analysis of protein kinase complex Dbf2-Mob1 by peptide library and proteome array screening. BMC Biochem 6, 10.1186/1471-2091-6-22 (2005).

  37. Randell, J. C. W. et al. Mec1 Is One of Multiple Kinases that Prime the Mcm2-7 Helicase for Phosphorylation by Cdc7. Mol. Cell 40, 353–363 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nguyen, H. & Kettenbach, A. N. Substrate and phosphorylation site selection by phosphoprotein phosphatases. Trends Biochem Sci 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2023.04.004 (2023)

  39. Hertz, E. P. T. et al. A conserved motif provides binding specificity to the pp2a-b56 phosphatase. Mol. Cell 63, 686–695 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kataria, M. et al. A PxL motif promotes timely cell cycle substrate dephosphorylation by the Cdc14 phosphatase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 1093–1102 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bailey, T. L. & Grant, C. E. SEA: Simple enrichment analysis of motifs. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.23.457422 (2021).

  42. Basu, S. et al. The hydrophobic patch directs cyclin b to centrosomes to promote global cdk phosphorylation at mitosis. Curr. Biol. 30, 883–892.e4 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Örd, M. et al. Multisite phosphorylation code of CDK. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 649–658 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kapadia, N. & Nurse, P. Spatiotemporal orchestration of mitosis by cyclin-dependent kinase. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09172-y (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sutani, T. et al. Fission yeast condensin complex: Essential roles of non-SMC subunits for condensation and Cdc2 phosphorylation of Cut3/SMC4. Genes Dev. 13, 2271–2283 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hayles, J. et al. A genome-wide resource of cell cycle and cell shape genes of fission yeast. Open Biol. 3, 130053 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chica, N. et al. Nutritional control of cell size by the greatwall-endosulfine-PP2A·B55 pathway. Curr. Biol. 26, 319–330 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kokkoris, K., Castro, D. G. & Martin, S. G. The Tea4-PP1 landmark promotes local growth by dual Cdc42 GEF recruitment and GAP exclusion. J. Cell Sci. 127, 2005–2016 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pomerening, J. R., Sun, Y. K. & Ferrell, J. E. Systems-level dissection of the cell-cycle oscillator: Bypassing positive feedback produces damped oscillations. Cell 122, 565–578 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Solomon, M. J., Glotzer, M., Lee, T. H., Philippe, M. & Kirschner, M. W. Cyclin activation of p34cdc2. Cell 63, 1013–1024 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shiozaki, K. & Russell, P. Cell cycle control linked to extracellular environment by MAP kinase pathway in fission yeast. 378, 739–743 (1995).

  52. Petersen, J. & Hagan, I. M. Polo kinase links the stress pathway to cell cycle control and tip growth in fission yeast. Nature 435, 507–512 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jenkinson, F., Tan, K. W., Schöpf, B., Santos, M. M. & Zegerman, P. Dephosphorylation of the pre-initiation complex is critical for origin firing. Mol. Cell 83, 12–25.e10 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Birot, A. et al. A second Wpl1 anti-cohesion pathway requires dephosphorylation of fission yeast kleisin Rad21 by PP4. EMBO J. 36, 1364–1378 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Goshima, G., Iwasaki, O., Obuse, C. & Yanagida, M. The role of Ppe1/PP6 phosphatase for equal chromosome segregation in fission yeast kinetochore. EMBO J. 22, 2752–2763 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Grallert, A. et al. A PP1-PP2A phosphatase relay controls mitotic progression. Nature 517, 94–98 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rogers, S. et al. PP1 initiates the dephosphorylation of MASTL, triggering mitotic exit and bistability in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 129, 1340–1354 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stern, B. & Nurse, P. A quantitative model for the cdc2 control of S phase and mitosis in fission yeast. Trends Genet. 12, 345–350 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Oikonomou, C. & Cross, F. R. Rising cyclin-CDK levels order cell cycle events. PLoS One 6, 10.1371/journal.pone.0020788 (2011).

  60. McCloy, R. A. et al. Partial inhibition of Cdk1 in G2 phase overrides the SAC and decouples mitotic events. Cell Cycle 13, 1400–1412 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Basu, S., Patterson, J. O., Zeisner, T. U. & Nurse, P. A CDK activity buffer ensures mitotic completion. J. Cell Sci. 135, 1–7 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Moreno, S., Klar, A. & Nurse, P. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194, 795–823 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tanaka, N. et al. Cell surface galactosylation is essential for nonsexual flocculation in schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Bacteriol. 181, 1356 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Edelstein, A. D. et al. Advanced methods of microscope control using μmanager software. J. Biol. Methods 1, e10 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kapadia, N. et al. Processive activity of replicative DNA polymerases in the replisome of live eukaryotic cells. Mol. Cell 80, 114–126.e8 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Roberts, E. L. et al. CDK activity at the centrosome regulates the cell cycle. Cell Rep 43, 114066 (2024).

  67. Grallert, A. et al. Removal of centrosomal PP1 by NIMA kinase unlocks the MPF feedback loop to promote mitotic commitment in S. pombe. Curr. Biol. 23, 213–222 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Colaert, N., Helsens, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J. & Gevaert, K. Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo. Nat. Methods 6, 786–787 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ge, S. X., Jung, D., Jung, D. & Yao, R. ShinyGO: A graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics 36, 2628–2629 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Krystkowiak, I. & Davey, N. E. SLiMSearch: A framework for proteome-wide discovery and annotation of functional modules in intrinsically disordered regions. Nucleic Acids Res 45, W464–W469 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.Curran, J. Greenwood, B. Whyte, S. Willich and T. Hammond for their comments on the manuscript, J. Curran for help with plasmid construction, T. Carr and A. Watson for S. pombe strains with the OsTIR1(F74A)-NLS construct, L.Du for the auxin-tagging plasmid and I. Hagan for sharing antibodies. This work was supported by the Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (CC2003), the UK Medical Research Council (CC2003), and the Wellcome Trust (CC2003). In addition, this work was supported by the Wellcome Trust Grant to P.N. (grant number 214183), The Lord Leonard and Lady Estelle Wolfson Foundation, Woosnam Foundation and The Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF-23-117). T.U.Z. received funding from the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by The Francis Crick Institute.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Theresa U. Zeisner

    Present address: Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), 1030, Vienna, Austria

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cell Cycle Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK

    Theresa U. Zeisner, Tania Auchynnikava, Emma L. Roberts & Paul Nurse

  2. Proteomics Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK

    Tania Auchynnikava

  3. Laboratory of Yeast Genetics and Cell Biology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA

    Paul Nurse

Authors
  1. Theresa U. Zeisner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tania Auchynnikava
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emma L. Roberts
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Nurse
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.U.Z. and P.N. initiated the study. T.U.Z. designed and performed all experiments. T.A. and T.U.Z. performed mass spectrometry experiments. E.L.R. developed the Spo15 protein and phospho-antibodies. T.U.Z. performed data analysis. T.U.Z. and P.N. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresa U. Zeisner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Jakob Nilsson, and the other anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Descriptions of Addtional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeisner, T.U., Auchynnikava, T., Roberts, E.L. et al. Phosphatase specificity influences phosphorylation timing of CDK substrates during the cell cycle. Nat Commun (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66547-5

Download citation

  • Received: 21 February 2025

  • Accepted: 06 November 2025

  • Published: 24 November 2025

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66547-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Cancel contracts here
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing