Entrepreneurial Development Programme
Entrepreneurial Development Programme
SUBMITTED BY
VIKAS JAISWAL
MBA Final Year
Session 2009-2011
SUBMITTED TO
EVALUATION OF EDPs
The present growth and success of EDPs in backward areas is far from satisfactory. It is observed that efforts made by various institutions have been limited and somewhat haphazard. The programmes conducted by various agencies vary in duration, selection process and course contents etc. the contribution of EDPs has been very uneven among various areas and states. EDPs are presently operating only in few states. In rural areas, their operation are not satisfactory and to the mark. Even within industrially developed states, there are many areas which have remained backward. The reason for this slow growth have been the environmental factors such as adverse terrain, soil, climate, etc. and lack of entrepreneurial spirit. Some important problems and weaknesses regarding EDPs are as follows: 1. Lack of co-ordination- It is observed that enough attention is not paid to streamline and there is a lack of co-ordination between activities related to the programmes to get the maximum result. 2. Inappropriate support system- It is also observed that the soundness and willingness of the support system greatly influence the success of the programme. But our EDPs lack sound support system to promote entrepreneurship. 3. Costly affair- Our EDPs are costly now-a-days. They have fancy budget to expend .But these cannot be afforded by developing economies like India. 4. Not catered to our needs- It is also noted that our EDPs are modeled on the classical theories of entrepreneurship. They are geared to meet out the need of elitist small group, while larger groups are not helped through these programmes. Needy entrepreneurs are not provided with proper help to meet their needs. EDPs fail to tap the entrepreneurial potential. Trained entrepreneurs do not received the support and counseling which they need most.
5. Lack of innovative functions- Most of the existing support organizations are meant for maintenance operations and not for innovative functions. 6. Improper selection of projects-another major problem is improper identification and selection of the projects. This leads to wrong choice of technology and improper forecasting of financial requirements.
7. Poor financial management- inadequate finance, poor working capital management, non-productive expenditure also pose major problems to the entrepreneurs.
8. Non-availability of inputs- Non-availability of various inputs such as raw materials, tools, machines, power, technical employees etc. and poor infrastructure resulted in the failing of EDPs.
manpower to
run the enterprise is another major problem. Small entrepreneurs cannot afford to employ skilled technical manpower at high wages. Seasonal availability of labor leads to low capacity utilization. 10. Unsatisfactory infrastructure facilities- lack of proper transport and
communication facilities reduce mobility and cause delays in the flow of information. Shortage of lands and industrial workshops, irregular power and water supply, defective systems for disposal of industrial waste, lack of roads, warehouse are other infrastructural problems. 11. Delays in project implementation- In many cases delays in project implementation result in cost increase. This in turn creates liquidity problems, increase debt burden and hikes the break-even point.
12. Multiplicity of government agencies- Multiplicity of government agencies leads to confusion and wastage of valuable time and energy of entrepreneurs. Moreover, these institutions are victims of procedural delays. 13. Dependency upon middlemen- Small entrepreneurs have to depend upon middlemen and face competition. They lack expertise and resources to compete with large business houses. With the result, inventories are piled up and entrepreneurs become unable to pay dues to financial institution in time.
14.
i- Consultancy services are satisfactory. ii- there is a low institutional commitment for local support to the entrepreneurs. iii- there is no standard curricula. iv- There is vagueness in the objectives of EDPs. v- The extension service of district industries centers is poor.
EDPs unfortunately have been linked with statical output rather than qualitative results. The quantitative dimension has forced manipulation in EDPs. It is taken that an EDP is a success with the maximum of participants of responses. The quality and impact of the EDP matters more than the quantitative dimension. Strategies to promote a particular target group, the nature of the non-traditional entrepreneurial activities and higher chances of success in new ventures go a long way in deciding the quality and impact of an EDP.