Separations and Reaction Engineering Design Project Styrene Production
Separations and Reaction Engineering Design Project Styrene Production
Design Project
Styrene Production
Your assignment is to continue evaluating the details of a process to produce 100,000 tonne/y
of styrene from ethylbenzene in an 8200-hour year. This is the amount of styrene in the product
stream, not the total mass of the product stream. The ethylbenzene feed is available from another
part of the plant at 210 kPa and 136°C. The composition is 95 mol% ethylbenzene, 3 mol%
toluene, and 2 mol% benzene. The styrene purity is to be 99.8 wt% liquid at 250 kPa. The
liquid styrene temperature may not exceed 125°C to avoid spontaneous polymerization.
Chemical Reactions
k1
C 6 H 5 C 2 H 5 ←⎯
⎯⎯ C 6 H 5 C 2 H 3 + H 2 (1)
k −1
ethylbenzene styrene hydrogen
k
C 6 H 5 C 2 H 5 ⎯⎯→
2
C6 H 6 + C2 H 4 (2)
ethylbenzene benzene ethylene
k
C 6 H 5 C 2 H 5 + H 2 ⎯⎯→
3
C 6 H 5 CH 3 + CH 4 (3)
ethylbenzene hydrogen toluene methane
Kinetics (subscripts on r refer to reactions in Equation (1) – (3) were obtained from the
literature.1 The positive activation energy can arise from non-elementary kinetics and/or from
reversible reactions:
⎛ 21,708 ⎞
r1 = 1.177 × 10 8 exp⎜ − ⎟ p eb (4)
⎝ RT ⎠
⎛ 7804 ⎞
r−1 = 20.965 exp⎜ ⎟ p sty p hyd (5)
⎝ RT ⎠
⎛ 49,675 ⎞
r2 = 7.206 × 1011 exp⎜ − ⎟ p eb (6)
⎝ RT ⎠
2
⎛ 21,857 ⎞
r3 = 1.724 × 10 6 exp⎜ − ⎟ p eb p hyd (7)
⎝ RT ⎠
The styrene reaction may be equilibrium limited, and the equilibrium constant is
⎛ y sty y hyd P ⎞
K = ⎜⎜ ⎟
⎟ (8)
⎝ y eb ⎠
and
14,852.6
ln K = 15.5408 − (9)
T
The bulk catalyst density is 1282 kg/m3, and the catalyst void fraction is 0.4.
Other Information
The cost for the initial charge of catalyst may be considered negligible. The catalyst
maximum temperature is 600°C.
Superheated steam is added to the reactor feed to force the equilibrium to the right.
Superheated steam may also be used as a source of high-temperature energy. Superheated steam
may be returned to the steam plant, and its value is $8/GJ above saturation temperature, with the
pressure at the level of the source of the superheated steam.
For an adiabatic, packed-bed reactor, the cost should be determined assuming the reactor is a
vessel. The L/D ratio should be no less than five. For a shell-and-tube reactor, the reactor cost is
twice the cost of a heat exchanger with the appropriate heat-transfer area.
Toluene and benzene can be returned elsewhere in the plant in the same stream; they need
not be separated from each other. There is no credit available.
Specific Assignments
You are to determine the number of distillation columns required, their locations, their
sequence, their type (tray of packed), and enough information for each column to determine their
costs. The distillation column that purifies styrene should be designed in detail. A detailed
3
design of a tray tower includes number of trays, tray spacing, diameter, reflux ratio, weir height,
top and bottom pressure specifications, and design of auxiliary equipment (heat exchangers,
pump, reflux drum, if present). A detailed design of a packed tower includes height, packing
size and type, and the same other specifications as in a tray tower. For all columns in this
project, you may assume that HETP = 0.6 m. For the distillation column, the better economical
choice between a packed and tray tower should be determined. For either a packed or a tray
distillation column, the optimum reflux ratio should be determined. Since the separation section
of this process is likely to operate at a vacuum, issues associated with vacuum columns might
impact the choice between a tray tower and a packed tower.
Note that a tower consists of a vessel with internals (trays or packing). The constraints on a
vessel are typically a height-to-diameter ratio less than 20. However, it is possible to extend this
ratio to 30 as long as the tower is less than about 3 ft (1 m) in diameter. For larger diameter
towers, stresses caused by wind limit the actual height. Extra supports are needed for a height-
to-diameter ratio above 20, even for smaller diameter columns. Therefore, there is a capital cost
“penalty” of an additional 25% (only on the vessel) up to a ratio of 25, and a “penalty” of an
additional 100% up to a ratio of 30.
You must choose the operating pressures for each column subject to constraints of operating
temperature and available utilities. If vacuum columns are needed, pressure drop becomes a
significant concern. As an alternative to tray towers, packed towers with a low-pressure-drop
structured packing may be used. The packing factors for some packings are provided in Wankat2
beginning on p. 394. Assume the HETP for the structured packing to be 0.6 m (see the definition
of HETP in Wankat2, p. 391, and the relationship between HETP and HOG in Equation (16.36) in
Wankat2.), and that the pressure drop is 0.2 kPa/m (0.245 inch water/ft).
Several reactor types may be considered for use in this design and should be optimized
separately. The one resulting in the lowest EAOC should be identified. Options include an
adiabatic, packed bed reactor (a series of these with interstage cooling, if needed), an
“isothermal,” packed bed reactor, and a packed bed reactor with heat exchange. An “isothermal”
reactor is defined here as one with a specified outlet temperature, not necessarily the inlet
temperature, and some form of heat exchange is needed to add or remove the heat of reaction to
maintain constant temperature. Chemcad will model the entire reactor as “isothermal” at that
temperature. It must be understood that this situation is not physically realistic. In a reactor with
heat exchange, the temperature along the length of the packed-bed reactor is not constant. The
temperature can be controlled by varying the temperature and flowrate of the heat-transfer fluid,
heat-transfer area, and the catalyst/inert ratio.
If a heat-transfer fluid is used, it is circulated in a closed loop through the reactor, where its
temperature is increased (if the reaction is endothermic) or decreased (if the reaction is
exothermic). Then, heat is added (removed) from the fluid in a heat exchanger (or fired heater, if
needed). The heat-transfer fluid is then pumped back to the reactor. The suggested heat-transfer
fluid is molten salt, which is a mixture of 40 wt % sodium nitrite and 60 wt % sodium nitrate.
4
Properties of the molten salt mixture can be obtained from Chemcad from a stream with the
appropriate composition.
The cost of a packed bed reactor can be estimated by adding the cost of a shell-and-tube heat
exchanger to the cost of the process vessel required to house the catalyst tubes. The cost of the
fluidized bed reactor should be taken to be twice the cost of the sum of a shell-and-tube heat
exchanger and the process vessel required to house the heat-transfer tubes.
Remember that the required units in Chemcad for the reaction rate are kmol/m3reactor hr.
The reactor EAOC should include anything that will vary depending on your decision variables,
i.e., the cost to heat the feed and cool the reactor and product streams. For your best case, you
should include a discussion of the temperature, pressure, and concentration profiles obtained
from Chemcad.
3. Overall Design
The entire process should be optimized based on your choice of process topology and
parametric optimization of decision variables appropriately chosen based on their importance to
the decision variable.
The objective function for the optimization should be the Equivalent Annual Operating Cost
(EAOC, $/y) for this section only, that is defined as:
⎛A ⎞
EAOC = CAP⎜ , i, n ⎟ + AOC (12)
⎝P ⎠
where CAP ($) is the capital investment for the compressors, the heat exchangers, the reactor,
and the distillation columns, AOC ($/y) is the annual operating cost, which includes utility costs
for the heat exchangers (including those associated with the distillation columns and
compressors, and
⎛A ⎞ i(1 + i ) n
⎜ , i, n ⎟ =
⎝P [ ]
⎠ (1 + i ) n − 1
(13)
Other Information
It should be assumed that a year equals 8200 hours. This is about 342 days, which allows for
periodic shutdown and maintenance.
5
Deliverables
Written Reports
Each team must deliver a report written using a word processor. Two identical copies should
be submitted, one for each instructor. The written project reports are due by 11:00 a.m. Tuesday,
April 17, 2012. Late projects will receive a minimum of a one letter grade deduction.
The report should be clear and concise. For the correct formatting information, refer to the
document entitled Written Design Reports. The report must contain a labeled process flow
diagram (PFD) and a stream table, each in the appropriate format. The preferred software for
preparing PFDs is Corel Draw. A PFD from Chemcad is unacceptable; however, it should be
included in the appendix along with a Chemcad report for the optimized case. When presenting
results for different cases, graphs are superior to tables. For the optimal case, the report
appendix should contain details of calculations that are easy to follow. These may be hand
written if done neatly. Alternatively, Excel spreadsheets may be included, but these must be well
documented so that the reader can interpret the results. Calculations that cannot be easily
followed and that are not explained will lose credit.
Since this project involves three “mini-designs,” it is suggested that the report be organized
with the following sections. There should be a general abstract and introduction. Then, there
should be a results section for the optimized process, including the reactor and separators, that
includes a PFD, stream table, and the overall economics.. The discussion section should have a
sub-section dedicated to the overall optimization, a sub-section dedicated to the reactor design,
and a sub-section dedicated to the separation design. A general conclusion and recommendation
section should follow. At a minimum, there should be separate appendices for each mini-design
containing detailed calculations that are clearly written, easy to follow, and appropriate for the
respective class.
In order to evaluate each team member’s writing skills, the results and discussion sections for
each mini-design should be written by a different team member. The authorship of each of these
mini-reports should be clearly specified in the report. If there is a fourth team member, this
person should author the introduction, conclusions, and recommendations. Although the
individual written portions of the reports must be authored by a single team member, it is the
intent of the instructors that team members should help each other in writing different sections.
To this end, we recommend that you seek input, such as proofreading and critiques, from other
members of your team.
For a more detailed set of evaluation criteria that will be used, see the following web site (design
project assessment, oral report assessment, written report assessment):
http://www.che.cemr.wvu.edu/ugrad/outcomes/rubrics/index.php
Each report will be assessed separately by both instructors. A historical account of what each
team did is neither required nor wanted. Results and explanations should be those needed to
justify your choices, not a litany of everything that was tried. Each mini-report should be limited
to 4-5 double space pages plus figures and tables.
This report should conform to the Department guidelines. It should be bound in a folder that
is not oversized relative to the number of pages in the report. Figures and tables should be
included as appropriate.
The written report is a very important part of the assignment. Poorly written and/or
organized written reports may require re-writing. Be sure to follow the format outlined in the
guidelines for written reports. Failure to follow the prescribed format may be grounds for a re-
write.
The following information, at a minimum, must appear in the main body of the final report:
1. a computer-generated PFD (not a Chemcad PFD) for the recommended, optimum case,
3. a list of new equipment for the process, costs, plus equipment specifications (presented
with a reasonable number of significant figures),
7. a discussion section pertinent to each class plus a general discussion section for
optimization of the entire process
8. a Chemcad Consolidated report only for your optimized case (in the Appendix). This
must contain the equipment connectivity, thermodynamics, and overall material balance
cover pages; stream flows; equipment summaries; tower profiles; and tray (packing)
design specifications (if you use Chemcad to design the trays (packing)). It should not
contain stream properties. Missing Chemcad output will not be requested; credit will be
deducted as if the information is missing.
7
Oral Reports
Each team will give an oral report in which the results of this project will be presented in a
concise manner. The oral report should be between 15-20 minutes, and each team member must
speak. Each team member should speak only once. A 5-10 minute question-and-answer session
will follow, and all members must participate. Refer to the document entitled Oral Reports for
instructions. The oral presentations will be Tuesday, April 17, 2012, from 11:00 am to 2:00
p.m.; Wednesday April 18, 2012, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 pm; and Thursday, April 19, 2012, from
11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Attendance is required of all students during their classmates’
presentations (this means in the room, not in the hall or the computer room). Failure to attend
any of the above-required sessions will result in a decrease of one-letter grade (per
occurrence) from your project grade in ChE 312 and ChE 325.
Teams
This project will be completed in teams of 3 or 4. More details of team formation and peer
evaluation will be discussed in class.
References
2. Wankat, P., Separation Process Engineering, (3nd ed.), Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle
River, NJ, 2012.
8
Appendix 1
Economic Data
Note: The numbers following the attribute are the minimum and maximum values for that
attribute. For a piece of equipment with a lower attribute value than the minimum, the minimum
attribute value should be used to compute the cost. For a piece of equipment with a larger
attribute value, extrapolation is possible, but inaccurate. To err on the side of caution, the price
for multiple, identical, smaller pieces of equipment should be used.
Heat Exchangers log10 (purchased cost ) = 4.6 − 0.8 log10 A + 0.3[log10 A]2
A = heat exchange area (m2, 20, 1000)
Reactors For this project, the reactor is considered to be a vessel or a heat exchanger.
It may be assumed that pipes and valves are included in the equipment cost factors. Location of
key valves should be specified on the PFD.
Chemical Prices
See http://www.icis.com/StaticPages/a-e.htm.
Utility Costs
Electricity $0.06/kWh
Total Installed Cost = Purchased Cost (4 + material factor (MF) + pressure factor (PF))
Pressure < 10 atm, PF = 0.0 does not apply to turbines, compressors, vessels,
(absolute) 10 - 20 atm, PF = 0.6 packing, trays, or catalyst, since their cost
20 - 40 atm, PF = 3.0 equations include pressure effects
40 - 50 atm, PR = 5.0
50 - 100 atm, PF = 10