LR The Addition and Resolution of Vectors The Force Table
LR The Addition and Resolution of Vectors The Force Table
Steeven Imbaquingo
06/13/17
PHY 215
Prof. Kibrewossen Tesfagiorgis
Introduction:
Physical quantities are commonly categorized as scalar or vector quantities. A scalar
m
quantity has only magnitude and units. For example: a scalar quantity will be 10 , which is
s
telling us the speed. Thus, scalar quantities are temperature, energy, and time; they are always
positive but it does not say the direction. However, vector quantity does tell the direction. For
m
example: 3 East , which is velocity indicating the direction is going. Consequently, vector
s
quantities are displacement, acceleration, force, and momentum; they tell the direction is going,
magnitude, and they are either positive or negative.
Since vector quantities tells the direction, then we can add them with special methods like
the triangular method, the parallelogram method, or the component method. Using these methods
will helps us find the resultant or the vector sum.
Objective:
Our objective was to use the force table to figure out the mass of the resultant and the
degree of the resultant. Then, it was to add the vectors graphically to find the resultant. Next, add
the vectors analytically to find the resultant. Finally, we are given the resultant and the degree, so
our objective was to find the two vectors.
Procedure:
1. First, we set up the table force with strings and suspended weights.
Vector Addition I:
2. We are given two vector quantities with magnitudes F 1=( 0.200 ) g N , θ1=30 ° and
F 2=(0.200) g N , θ2=120°(the total mass for each one will be 200g). First, in order to
find the sum of these two vectors, we find it experimentally, then graphically, and
analytically.
Experimentally:
- On the force table, we set up the clamp pulleys at 30 °∧120 ° and we added enough
weights to total 200g
- Now, we have to determine the third clamp pulley by simultaneously adding weights and
manipulating the magnitude and direction of the equilibrant force that sustains the central
ring centered in steadiness around the center pin.
- Then, when it’s centered, it will give us the resultant’s mass and angle, but it is in the
opposite direction. Finally, record the data on the table.
Graphically:
- We are going to use the triangular method in order to draw these two vectors that were
given to us. However, first we have to set up a scale (25 mm=100 g).
- Then we are going to measure the magnitude and the direction of the resultant with a
ruler and protractor. Finally, record it on the table.
Analytical:
- First, we find ⃗ R x and ⃗
R y by computing the two vectors that were given to us:
o ⃗R x =⃗
A x+⃗Bx
o ⃗R y =⃗
A y +⃗Bx
- Then we are going to use the Pythagorean Theorem to find the
- resultant:
o R= √ R x 2+ R y 2
- Last, is to calculate the direction of the resultant;
o tan−1 y
| |
R
Rx
Analytical:
- We are going to compute the resultant that was given along with the angle:
o F x =Rcos ( θ ) ∧F y =Rsin (θ )
Vector Addition IV:
6. We are given three different magnitudes with different angles, which they are
F 1=( 0.100 ) g N , θ1=30 ° F2= ( 0.200 ) g N , θ2=90 ° and F 3=( 0.300 ) g N , θ3=225° . We are
going to compute the resultant the same we did on step two. However, since there are
three vectors we are going to use the parallelogram method graphically, then we are
going to compute the resultant by using the component method analytical, and
experimentally we are going to use the force table and balance
7. Finally record the data on the table.
Data Set:
Forces (N) Resultant R (magnitude and direction)
Graphical Analytical Experimental
Vector F 1=( 0.200 ) g N , θ1=30 ° F=( . 280 ) g N F=( .283 ) g N F=( .286 ) g N
Addition I F 2=( 0.200 ) g N , θ2=120 ° θ=77 ° θ=75° θ=75°
Vector F 1=( 0.200 ) g N , θ1=20 ° F=( .312 ) g N F=( .304 ) g N F=( .311 ) g N
Addition F 2=( 0.150 ) g N , θ2=80° θ=45 ° θ=45 ° θ=41 °
II
Vector F 1=F x =( 0.200 ) g N , θ1=0° F=( .24 0 ) g N F=( .25 0 ) g N F=( .251 ) g N
Addition F 2=F y =( 0.150 ) g N , θ2=90° θ=35° θ=36.8° θ=35.2°
III
Vector F x =( .148 ) g N F x =( .150 ) g N F x =( .150 ) g N
Resolutio F=( 0.200 ) g N , θ=6 0 ° F y =( .260 ) g N F y =( .260 ) g N F y =( .267 ) g N
n
Vector F 1=( 0.100 ) g N , θ1=30 ° F=( .140 ) g N F=( .13 0 ) g N F=( .131 ) g N
Addition F 2=( 0.200 ) g N , θ2=90° θ=160° θ=163° θ=162°
IV F 3=( 0.300 ) g N , θ3=225°
Vector Addition I:
F1:
F2:
⃗A x =200 cos ( 30 ° )=173⃗
A y =200 sin (30 ° )=100 θ=tan
−1
( )
Ry
Rx
⃗
Bx =200cos ( 120° ) =−100⃗
B y =200 sin ( 120 ° )=173
R= √( 173−100 ) + ( 100+173 ) =283 g
2 2
θ=tan −1( )
273
73
=75 °
θ=tan −1( )
216
214
=45 °
θ=tan −1( )
150
200
=36.8 °
Vector Resolution:
F : F ( 0.300 ) g N ,θ=60 °
F x =300 cos ( 60 ° )=150 gF y =300 sin ( 60° )=260 g
Vector Addition IV:
F1:
⃗ A x =100 cos ( 30 ° )=87⃗
A y =100 sin (30 ° )=50
F2:
⃗
Bx =200cos ( 90 ° )=0⃗
B y =200 sin ( 90 ° )=200
F3:
⃗
C x =300 cos ( 225 ° )=−212⃗
C y =300 sin ( 225° )=−212
θ=tan −1 (
38
−125 )
=163 °
Percent error:
1. 1.1 %
2. 2.3 %
3. 0.4 %
4. F x =0 % F y =2.7 %
5. 0.8 %
Conclusion:
We can conclude that there were minimal errors results between experimental, graphical,
and analytical. For example, when we were solving the resultant analytical, it gave a precise
result because we were using vector formulas. However, when we did it graphically, it gave us a
slightly different result because we drew the vectors according to scale. Therefore, these minimal
errors tell us that we were close to our accurate measurements.