0% found this document useful (0 votes)
279 views

ECE 391 Supplemental Notes - #1: Lumped vs. Distributed Circuits

This document discusses the differences between lumped and distributed circuits, with lumped circuits having dimensions small enough that voltage and current do not vary along conductors, while distributed circuits have dimensions where voltage and current vary along conductors. It provides examples of how to determine if a circuit can be treated as lumped or distributed based on signal rise times and propagation delays. Guidelines are given for classifying transmission line problems based on the ratio of signal rise time to propagation delay.

Uploaded by

Anh Viet Nguyen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
279 views

ECE 391 Supplemental Notes - #1: Lumped vs. Distributed Circuits

This document discusses the differences between lumped and distributed circuits, with lumped circuits having dimensions small enough that voltage and current do not vary along conductors, while distributed circuits have dimensions where voltage and current vary along conductors. It provides examples of how to determine if a circuit can be treated as lumped or distributed based on signal rise times and propagation delays. Guidelines are given for classifying transmission line problems based on the ratio of signal rise time to propagation delay.

Uploaded by

Anh Viet Nguyen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

ECE 391

supplemental notes - #1

1
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Lumped vs. Distributed Circuits


Lumped-Element Circuits:
•  Physical dimensions of circuit are such that voltage
across and current through conductors connecting
elements does not vary.
•  Current in two-terminal lumped circuit element does not
vary (phase change or transit time are neglected)

2
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

1
Lumped vs. Distributed Circuits
Distributed Circuits:
•  Current varies along conductors and elements;
•  Voltage across points along conductor or within element
varies
è phase change or transit time cannot be neglected

Example: 25 cm

f = 300MHz vp=c è∞

c 3 ×108 ms
λ= = = 1m
f 300 ×10 6 1s
current
wavelength λ
= 1 period in space distance
3
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Example: Hybrid Microwave


Integrated Circuit (MIC)
distributed element

transmission line
interconnection

lumped element

èlow loss
4
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

2
When Do We Need to Consider
Transmission Lines Efects
digital domain analog domain
100% λ
90%
10%
0% distance
tr tf
risetime falltime

flight time (delay time) td=d/vp maximum dimension d

tr, tf vs td d vs λ
5
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Lumped vs. Distributed


td = length/velocity
Z0, td

VS RL
vs (t ) = v0 u (t )

§  Rule-of-thumb (heuristic)


Delay time td = length of line / velocity
Rise time of signal tr (fall time tf)

Signal path can be treated as


lumped element" distributed element"
if! tr td > 6 if! t r td < 2.5
6
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

3
Example
•  CMOS Buffer with tr = tf = 0.5 ns
•  FR-4 PCB (velocity ≈ 0.45 c)
•  Note: VDD
vp ≈ c εr signal εr
gnd

Determine maximum distance d so that tr/td > 6

tr/td = tr/(d/vp) > 6 è d < tr vp/6

d < 0.5ns * (0.45*30cm/ns)/6 = 1.125 cm ≈ 11 mm


7
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

TL Problem Classification
“faster board”
risetime
0 2.5td 6td
clock reset signals
simulate and check after no problems with critical timing (or
layout of ckt go for it! edge sensitivity)
simulate and non-critical signals
consider quick no problems
check after (e.g. data lines with
hand analysis go for it!
layout of ckt tsu ≈ 6 td)
simulate and status signals; slow,
check after no problems expected insensitive lines
layout of ckt
In this region,
other consid.
begin to surface
(EMI, crosstalk)
8
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

4
Sinusoidal Signals

V0 cos(2π ft)
= V0 cos(ω t)

z

phase constant
V0 cos(ω (t − td )
ω 2π
β= = = V0 cos(ω t − ω td )
vp λ z
= V0 cos(ω t − ω ) = V0 cos(ω t − β z)
vp
In practice: lumped if td < 0.1 T (d < 0.1 λ)
safely lumped if d < 0.01λ 9
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Illustration

CH1 CH2

time
10
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

5
Example: Lumped vs. Distributed
For example, the spatial dependence z of the current
i(z, t) = I 0 cos(ω t − β z)
in a conductor can be neglected if z λ << 1.
1.25
Example: f = 100 MHz
1
Normalized current I(z,t=0) 0.75 f = 1GHz
0.5
0.25 f = 10 GHz
0
-0.25
-0.5
-0.75
-1
-1.25
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Distance (cm)

resistor
11
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Concept: Electrical Length


•  Electrical length (θ, E) is a measure of the
physical length expressed in terms of
wavelength λ

z
θ = E = 2π (in radians)
λ
z
θ = E = 360 0 (in degrees)
λ
z
E= (as fraction of wavelength)
λ
12
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

6
Transmission Line Examples

coaxial line two-wire line (also twisted-pair)

microstrip stripline

coplanar strip (CPS) coplanar waveguide (CPW)

13
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Transmission Lines/Interconnects
§  What is a transmission line?
–  lumped vs. distributed circuit?
–  how many conductors?
§  Types of transmission lines
–  on-chip (à transmission line?)
–  off chip
–  PCB, packages
–  cables (coax, twisted pair, …)
–  etc.
§  Applications of transmission lines
–  interconnections
§  signal transmission
§  power transmission
–  circuit elements/functional components (at high frequencies)
§  filters (e.g. coupled lines, stubs, …)
§  couplers
§  power dividers
§  matching networks
–  …
14
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

7
Interconnect Technologies

Inter- Line Line Max.


connection Width Thickness Length
On-chip Type (µm) (µm) (cm)

On-Chip 0.5-2 0.5-2 0.3-1.5

Package Thin-Film 10-25 5-8 20-45

75-10
PCB Ceramic 16-25 20-50
0
60-10
 PCB
0
8-70 40-70

cables, etc.
Source: IBM (plus changes)

15
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Transmission Line –
Characteristic Dimensions
Cross-sectional Dimensions
<< wavelength

D << λ D L

D
L
L < λ  L >> λ
Lengths vary from fractions of a
wavelength to many wavelengths
16
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

8
Model for Transmission Line

Note: here R,L,G,C


generic equivalent
circuit model represent total values
per section

17
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Transmission Line Parameters

Cross-sectional view of typical uniform interconnects:

§  Capacitance between conductors, C (F/m)


§  Inductance of conductor loop, L (H/m)
§  Resistance of conductors (conductor loss), R (Ω/m)
§  Shunt conductance (dielectric loss), G (S/m)

R,L,G,C are specified as per-unit-length parameters

18
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

9
Derivation of Transmission Line Equations

∂i(z, t )
− [v(z + Δz, t ) − v(z , t )] = LΔz
∂t
∂v(z + Δz , t )
− [i (z + Δz, t ) − i(z, t )] = CΔz
∂t
Note: here L,C are per-unit-length parameters
19
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Transmission Line Equations


Lossless transmission line
i
∂i(z, t )
− [v(z + Δz, t ) − v(z , t )] = LΔz
∂t
∂v(z + Δz , t )
− [i (z + Δz, t ) − i(z, t )] = CΔz
∂t

after taking Δz → 0

Telegrapher’s Equations
∂v( z , t ) ∂i ( z , t ) ∂i ( z , t ) ∂v( z , t )
− =L − =C
∂z ∂t ∂z ∂t

20
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

10
Wave Equations
∂v( z , t ) ∂i ( z , t ) ∂i ( z , t ) ∂v( z , t )
− =L − =C
∂z ∂t ∂z ∂t

Wave Equations

∂ 2 v( z , t ) ∂ 2 v( z , t ) 1 ∂ 2 v( z , t )
= LC =
∂z 2 ∂t 2 v 2p ∂t 2

∂ 2i ( z , t ) ∂ 2i ( z , t ) 1 ∂ 2i ( z , t )
= LC = 2
∂z 2 ∂t 2 vp ∂t 2

21
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

General Wave Solutions


∂ 2v ∂ 2v 1 ∂ 2v
= LC =
∂z 2 ∂t 2 v 2p ∂t 2

General Solution for Voltage


v( z , t ) = v + ( z − v p t ) + v − ( z + v p t )
= v + (t − z / v p ) + v − (t + z / v p )

+z direction -z direction
1
Velocity of Propagation vp = (m/s )
LC
22
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

11
Illustration of Space–Time Variation of
Single Traveling Wave
v( z , t ) = v + ( z − v p t ) + v − ( z + v p t )
= v + (t − z / v p ) + v − (t + z / v p )

vp

vp

time distance
23
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Wave Solutions for Current


i( z, t ) = i + (t − z / v p ) + i − (t + z / v p )
∂v( z, t ) ∂i( z, t ) ∂i( z, t ) ∂v( z, t )
− =L − =C
∂z ∂t ∂z ∂t

1 +
vp
{ } {
v (t − z / v p ) − v − (t + z / v p ) = L i + (t − z / v p ) + i − (t + z / v p ) }
1 −
vp
{ } {
i (t − z / v p ) − i − (t + z / v p ) = C v + (t − z / v p ) + v − (t + z / v p ) }

v + (t − z / v p ) v − (t + z / v p )
i( z, t ) = −
Z0 Z0
1 L
Characteristic Impedance Z0 = v p L = = (Ω)
v pC C
24
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

12
Summary of
Transmission Line Parameters
•  Capacitance per-unit-length C (F/m)
•  Inductance per-unit-length L (H/m)
•  Characteristic impedance Z 0 (Ω)
•  Velocity of propagation v p (m/s)
•  Per-unit-length delay time t p = 1 v p (s/m)
•  Delay time (TD) t d = l v p = l t p (sec)
L 1
Z0 = vp = t p = LC td = l LC
C LC
L = Z0 v p = Z0 t p C = 1 (Z 0v p ) = t p Z 0
25
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Properties of Ideal Transmission Lines

§  C from 2D electro-static solution


§  L from 2D magneto-static solution

§  Velocity of propagation


1 1 c
vp = = = 0 c0 ≈ 30 cm/nsec
LC µ0 µ r ε 0ε r εr
(neglecting magnetic materials)
26
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

13
Propagation Speeds for
Typical Dielectrics

Dielectric Rel. Dielectric Constant Propagation Delay time


εr speed
(cm/nsec)
per unit length
(ps/cm)
Polyimide 2.5 – 3.5 16-19 53 - 62
Silicon dioxide 3.9 15 66
Epoxy glass (PCB) 5.0 13 75
Alumina (ceramic) 9.5 10 103

27
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Example T-Line Structures


Parallel-Plate Line Coaxial Line

w
t

εr a

εr s
b

c

2πε 0ε r µ0 ⎛ b ⎞
w s C= L= ln⎜ ⎟
C = ε 0ε r L = µ0 ln(b a ) 2π ⎝ a ⎠
s w
µ ln(b a )
Z0 =
µ s 2ρ ε 0ε r 2π
Z0 = RDC =
wt ρ ρ
ε 0ε r w RDC = +
π a π (c − b 2 )
2 2

28
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

14
Examples (cont’d)
r
r

s
s

2ρ ρ
RDC = RDC =
π r2 π r2
πε 2πε
C= C=
cosh −1
(s 2r ) cosh −1 (s r )
µ0 µ0
L= cosh −1 (s 2r ) L= cosh −1 (s r )
π 2π
1 µ0 1 µ0
Z0 = cosh −1 (s 2r ) Z0 = cosh −1 (s r )
π ε 2π ε

29
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

Examples (cont’d)
stripline microstrip
W
ε0
t

W
εr

εr
t
b
h

1 µ ⎛ 1+ w b ⎞ 1 µ ⎛ 4h ⎞
Z0 = ln⎜ ⎟ Z0 = ln⎜ ⎟
4 ε ⎜⎝ w b + t b ⎟⎠ 2π ε 0ε eff ⎝ d ⎠
1
C = εr d = 0.536w + 0.67t
c0 Z 0
Z0 ε eff ≈ 0.475ε r + 0.67
L = εr
c0
(very approximate!)
30
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

15
Alternative Formulas
w

ε0
t

A
w

εr

εr
t
b
h

B

60Ω ⎛ 4b ⎞
Z 0,sym = ln⎜ ⎟ 87 Ω ⎛ 5.98h ⎞
ε r ⎜⎝ 0.67π (t + 0.8w) ⎟⎠ Z0 = ln⎜ ⎟
ε r + 1.41 ⎝ 0.8w + t ⎠
for w/b < 0.35 and
t/b < 0.25 for 0.1 < w/h < 2
and 1 < εr < 15
Z 0, sym (2 A, w, t , ε r ) * Z 0, sym (2 B, w, t , ε r )
Z 0,offset ≅ 2
Z 0, sym (2 A, w, t , ε r ) + Z 0, sym (2 B, w, t , ε r )

more accurate if 2A # 2A+t and 2B # 2B+t



31
Oregon State University ECE391– Transmission Lines Spring Term 2014

16

You might also like