CIS Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) Benchmark v1.0.0
CIS Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) Benchmark v1.0.0
Terms of Use
Please see the below link for our current terms of use:
https://www.cisecurity.org/cis-securesuite/cis-securesuite-membership-terms-of-use/
1 | P a g e
Table of Contents
2 | P a g e
1.1.11 Ensure that the etcd data directory permissions are set to 700 or more
restrictive (Not Scored) ................................................................................................................... 37
1.1.12 Ensure that the etcd data directory ownership is set to etcd:etcd (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 39
1.1.13 Ensure that the admin.conf file permissions are set to 644 or more
restrictive (Not Scored) ................................................................................................................... 41
1.1.14 Ensure that the admin.conf file ownership is set to root:root (Not Scored)
.................................................................................................................................................................... 43
1.1.15 Ensure that the scheduler.conf file permissions are set to 644 or more
restrictive (Not Scored) ................................................................................................................... 45
1.1.16 Ensure that the scheduler.conf file ownership is set to root:root (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 47
1.1.17 Ensure that the controller-manager.conf file permissions are set to 644 or
more restrictive (Not Scored) ....................................................................................................... 49
1.1.18 Ensure that the controller-manager.conf file ownership is set to root:root
(Not Scored) ......................................................................................................................................... 51
1.1.19 Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI directory and file ownership is set to
root:root (Not Scored) ..................................................................................................................... 53
1.1.20 Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI certificate file permissions are set to 644
or more restrictive (Not Scored) ................................................................................................. 55
1.1.21 Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI key file permissions are set to 600 (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 57
1.2 API Server ................................................................................................................................................ 59
1.2.1 Ensure that the --anonymous-auth argument is set to false (Not Scored) .... 59
1.2.2 Ensure that the --basic-auth-file argument is not set (Not Scored) .................. 61
1.2.3 Ensure that the --token-auth-file parameter is not set (Not Scored) ............... 63
1.2.4 Ensure that the --kubelet-https argument is set to true (Not Scored) ............. 65
1.2.5 Ensure that the --kubelet-client-certificate and --kubelet-client-key
arguments are set as appropriate (Not Scored) ................................................................... 67
1.2.6 Ensure that the --kubelet-certificate-authority argument is set as
appropriate (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................... 69
1.2.7 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument is not set to AlwaysAllow
(Not Scored) ......................................................................................................................................... 71
3 | P a g e
1.2.8 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument includes Node (Not Scored)
.................................................................................................................................................................... 73
1.2.9 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument includes RBAC (Not Scored)
.................................................................................................................................................................... 75
1.2.10 Ensure that the admission control plugin EventRateLimit is set (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 77
1.2.11 Ensure that the admission control plugin AlwaysAdmit is not set (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 79
1.2.12 Ensure that the admission control plugin AlwaysPullImages is set (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 81
1.2.13 Ensure that the admission control plugin SecurityContextDeny is set if
PodSecurityPolicy is not used (Not Scored) ........................................................................... 83
1.2.14 Ensure that the admission control plugin ServiceAccount is set (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 85
1.2.15 Ensure that the admission control plugin NamespaceLifecycle is set (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 87
1.2.16 Ensure that the admission control plugin PodSecurityPolicy is set (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 89
1.2.17 Ensure that the admission control plugin NodeRestriction is set (Not
Scored) .................................................................................................................................................... 91
1.2.18 Ensure that the --insecure-bind-address argument is not set (Not Scored)
.................................................................................................................................................................... 93
1.2.19 Ensure that the --insecure-port argument is set to 0 (Not Scored) ................ 95
1.2.20 Ensure that the --secure-port argument is not set to 0 (Not Scored) ............ 97
1.2.21 Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false (Not Scored) ................... 99
1.2.22 Ensure that the --audit-log-path argument is set (Not Scored) .................... 101
1.2.23 Ensure that the --audit-log-maxage argument is set to 30 or as appropriate
(Not Scored) ...................................................................................................................................... 103
1.2.24 Ensure that the --audit-log-maxbackup argument is set to 10 or as
appropriate (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................ 105
1.2.25 Ensure that the --audit-log-maxsize argument is set to 100 or as
appropriate (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................ 107
1.2.26 Ensure that the --request-timeout argument is set as appropriate (Not
Scored) ................................................................................................................................................. 109
4 | P a g e
1.2.27 Ensure that the --service-account-lookup argument is set to true (Not
Scored) ................................................................................................................................................. 111
1.2.28 Ensure that the --service-account-key-file argument is set as appropriate
(Not Scored) ...................................................................................................................................... 113
1.2.29 Ensure that the --etcd-certfile and --etcd-keyfile arguments are set as
appropriate (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................ 115
1.2.30 Ensure that the --tls-cert-file and --tls-private-key-file arguments are set as
appropriate (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................ 117
1.2.31 Ensure that the --client-ca-file argument is set as appropriate (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 119
1.2.32 Ensure that the --etcd-cafile argument is set as appropriate (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 121
1.2.33 Ensure that the --encryption-provider-config argument is set as
appropriate (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................ 123
1.2.34 Ensure that encryption providers are appropriately configured (Not
Scored) ................................................................................................................................................. 125
1.2.35 Ensure that the API Server only makes use of Strong Cryptographic Ciphers
(Not Scored) ...................................................................................................................................... 127
1.3 Controller Manager ........................................................................................................................... 129
1.3.1 Ensure that the --terminated-pod-gc-threshold argument is set as
appropriate (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................ 129
1.3.2 Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false (Not Scored) ................... 131
1.3.3 Ensure that the --use-service-account-credentials argument is set to true
(Not Scored) ...................................................................................................................................... 133
1.3.4 Ensure that the --service-account-private-key-file argument is set as
appropriate (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................ 135
1.3.5 Ensure that the --root-ca-file argument is set as appropriate (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 137
1.3.6 Ensure that the RotateKubeletServerCertificate argument is set to true (Not
Scored) ................................................................................................................................................. 139
1.3.7 Ensure that the --bind-address argument is set to 127.0.0.1 (Not Scored) 141
1.4 Scheduler .............................................................................................................................................. 143
1.4.1 Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false (Not Scored) ................... 143
1.4.2 Ensure that the --bind-address argument is set to 127.0.0.1 (Not Scored) 145
5 | P a g e
2 etcd ................................................................................................................................................................... 147
2.1 Ensure that the --cert-file and --key-file arguments are set as appropriate (Not
Scored) ................................................................................................................................................. 147
2.2 Ensure that the --client-cert-auth argument is set to true (Not Scored) ......... 149
2.3 Ensure that the --auto-tls argument is not set to true (Not Scored) ................. 151
2.4 Ensure that the --peer-cert-file and --peer-key-file arguments are set as
appropriate (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................ 153
2.5 Ensure that the --peer-client-cert-auth argument is set to true (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 155
2.6 Ensure that the --peer-auto-tls argument is not set to true (Not Scored) ...... 157
2.7 Ensure that a unique Certificate Authority is used for etcd (Not Scored) ...... 159
3 Control Plane Configuration .................................................................................................................. 160
3.1 Authentication and Authorization ............................................................................................. 161
3.1.1 Client certificate authentication should not be used for users (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 161
3.2 Logging ................................................................................................................................................... 163
3.2.1 Ensure that a minimal audit policy is created (Not Scored) ............................. 163
3.2.2 Ensure that the audit policy covers key security concerns (Not Scored) .... 165
4 Worker Nodes .............................................................................................................................................. 167
4.1 Worker Node Configuration Files ............................................................................................... 168
4.1.1 Ensure that the kubelet service file permissions are set to 644 or more
restrictive (Not Scored) ................................................................................................................ 168
4.1.2 Ensure that the kubelet service file ownership is set to root:root (Not
Scored) ................................................................................................................................................. 170
4.1.3 Ensure that the proxy kubeconfig file permissions are set to 644 or more
restrictive (Scored) ........................................................................................................................ 172
4.1.4 Ensure that the proxy kubeconfig file ownership is set to root:root (Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 174
4.1.5 Ensure that the kubelet.conf file permissions are set to 644 or more
restrictive (Not Scored) ................................................................................................................ 176
4.1.6 Ensure that the kubelet.conf file ownership is set to root:root (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 178
6 | P a g e
4.1.7 Ensure that the certificate authorities file permissions are set to 644 or more
restrictive (Not Scored) ................................................................................................................ 180
4.1.8 Ensure that the client certificate authorities file ownership is set to root:root
(Not Scored) ...................................................................................................................................... 182
4.1.9 Ensure that the kubelet configuration file has permissions set to 644 or
more restrictive (Scored) ............................................................................................................ 184
4.1.10 Ensure that the kubelet configuration file ownership is set to root:root
(Scored) ............................................................................................................................................... 186
4.2 Kubelet ................................................................................................................................................... 188
4.2.1 Ensure that the --anonymous-auth argument is set to false (Scored) .......... 188
4.2.2 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument is not set to AlwaysAllow
(Scored) ............................................................................................................................................... 191
4.2.3 Ensure that the --client-ca-file argument is set as appropriate (Scored) .... 193
4.2.4 Ensure that the --read-only-port argument is set to 0 (Scored) ...................... 196
4.2.5 Ensure that the --streaming-connection-idle-timeout argument is not set to
0 (Scored) ........................................................................................................................................... 198
4.2.6 Ensure that the --protect-kernel-defaults argument is set to true (Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 200
4.2.7 Ensure that the --make-iptables-util-chains argument is set to true (Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 203
4.2.8 Ensure that the --hostname-override argument is not set (Scored) ............. 205
4.2.9 Ensure that the --event-qps argument is set to 0 or a level which ensures
appropriate event capture (Scored) ....................................................................................... 207
4.2.10 Ensure that the --tls-cert-file and --tls-private-key-file arguments are set as
appropriate (Scored) ..................................................................................................................... 209
4.2.11 Ensure that the --rotate-certificates argument is not set to false (Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 212
4.2.12 Ensure that the RotateKubeletServerCertificate argument is set to true
(Scored) ............................................................................................................................................... 215
4.2.13 Ensure that the Kubelet only makes use of Strong Cryptographic Ciphers
(Not Scored) ...................................................................................................................................... 217
5 Policies ............................................................................................................................................................ 219
5.1 RBAC and Service Accounts .......................................................................................................... 220
7 | P a g e
5.1.1 Ensure that the cluster-admin role is only used where required (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 220
5.1.2 Minimize access to secrets (Not Scored) ................................................................... 222
5.1.3 Minimize wildcard use in Roles and ClusterRoles (Not Scored) ..................... 224
5.1.4 Minimize access to create pods (Not Scored) .......................................................... 225
5.1.5 Ensure that default service accounts are not actively used. (Scored) .......... 227
5.1.6 Ensure that Service Account Tokens are only mounted where necessary (Not
Scored) ................................................................................................................................................. 229
5.2 Pod Security Policies ........................................................................................................................ 231
5.2.1 Minimize the admission of privileged containers (Scored) ............................... 231
5.2.2 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host process ID
namespace (Scored) ....................................................................................................................... 233
5.2.3 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host IPC
namespace (Scored) ....................................................................................................................... 235
5.2.4 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host network
namespace (Scored) ....................................................................................................................... 237
5.2.5 Minimize the admission of containers with allowPrivilegeEscalation
(Scored) ............................................................................................................................................... 239
5.2.6 Minimize the admission of root containers (Scored) ........................................... 241
5.2.7 Minimize the admission of containers with the NET_RAW capability (Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 243
5.2.8 Minimize the admission of containers with added capabilities (Scored) ... 245
5.2.9 Minimize the admission of containers with capabilities assigned (Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 247
5.3 Network Policies and CNI .............................................................................................................. 249
5.3.1 Ensure that the CNI in use supports Network Policies (Not Scored) ............ 249
5.3.2 Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Scored) ......... 251
5.4 Secrets Management ........................................................................................................................ 253
5.4.1 Prefer using secrets as files over secrets as environment variables (Not
Scored) ................................................................................................................................................. 253
5.4.2 Consider external secret storage (Not Scored) ....................................................... 255
5.5 Extensible Admission Control ...................................................................................................... 256
8 | P a g e
5.5.1 Configure Image Provenance using ImagePolicyWebhook admission
controller (Not Scored) ................................................................................................................. 256
5.6 General Policies .................................................................................................................................. 258
5.6.1 Create administrative boundaries between resources using namespaces
(Not Scored) ...................................................................................................................................... 258
5.6.2 Ensure that the seccomp profile is set to docker/default in your pod
definitions (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................... 260
5.6.3 Apply Security Context to Your Pods and Containers (Not Scored) .............. 262
5.6.4 The default namespace should not be used (Scored) .......................................... 264
6 Managed services ....................................................................................................................................... 265
6.1 Image Registry and Image Scanning ......................................................................................... 266
6.1.1 Ensure Image Vulnerability Scanning using GCR Container Analysis or a
third-party provider (Scored) ................................................................................................... 266
6.1.2 Minimize user access to GCR (Scored) ........................................................................ 268
6.1.3 Minimize cluster access to read-only for GCR (Scored) ...................................... 272
6.1.4 Minimize Container Registries to only those approved (Not Scored) .......... 275
6.2 Identity and Access Management (IAM) ................................................................................. 278
6.2.1 Ensure GKE clusters are not running using the Compute Engine default
service account (Scored) .............................................................................................................. 278
6.2.2 Prefer using dedicated GCP Service Accounts and Workload Identity (Not
Scored) ................................................................................................................................................. 283
6.3 Cloud Key Management Service (Cloud KMS) ...................................................................... 286
6.3.1 Ensure Kubernetes Secrets are encrypted using keys managed in Cloud KMS
(Scored) ............................................................................................................................................... 286
6.4 Node Metadata .................................................................................................................................... 290
6.4.1 Ensure legacy Compute Engine instance metadata APIs are Disabled
(Scored) ............................................................................................................................................... 290
6.4.2 Ensure the GKE Metadata Server is Enabled (Not Scored) ................................ 293
6.5 Node Configuration and Maintenance ...................................................................................... 296
6.5.1 Ensure Container-Optimized OS (COS) is used for GKE node images (Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 296
6.5.2 Ensure Node Auto-Repair is enabled for GKE nodes (Scored) ......................... 299
1.1.2 Using Google Cloud Console: ............................................................................................ 299
9 | P a g e
6.5.3 Ensure Node Auto-Upgrade is enabled for GKE nodes (Scored) ..................... 301
6.5.4 Automate GKE version management using Release Channels (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 304
6.5.5 Ensure Shielded GKE Nodes are Enabled (Not Scored) ...................................... 307
6.5.6 Ensure Integrity Monitoring for Shielded GKE Nodes is Enabled (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 310
6.5.7 Ensure Secure Boot for Shielded GKE Nodes is Enabled (Not Scored) ......... 313
6.6 Cluster Networking .......................................................................................................................... 316
6.6.1 Enable VPC Flow Logs and Intranode Visibility (Not Scored) .......................... 316
6.6.2 Ensure use of VPC-native clusters (Scored) ............................................................. 318
6.6.3 Ensure Master Authorized Networks is Enabled (Scored) ................................ 321
6.6.4 Ensure clusters are created with Private Endpoint Enabled and Public
Access Disabled (Scored) ............................................................................................................. 324
1.1.3 Using Google Cloud Console: ............................................................................................ 325
6.6.5 Ensure clusters are created with Private Nodes (Scored) ................................. 327
6.6.6 Consider firewalling GKE worker nodes (Not Scored) ........................................ 329
6.6.7 Ensure Network Policy is Enabled and set as appropriate (Not Scored) .... 333
6.6.8 Ensure use of Google-managed SSL Certificates (Not Scored) ......................... 336
6.7 Logging ................................................................................................................................................... 338
6.7.1 Ensure Stackdriver Kubernetes Logging and Monitoring is Enabled (Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 338
6.7.2 Enable Linux auditd logging (Not Scored) ................................................................ 343
6.8 Authentication and Authorization ............................................................................................. 346
6.8.1 Ensure Basic Authentication using static passwords is Disabled (Scored) 346
6.8.2 Ensure authentication using Client Certificates is Disabled (Scored) ........... 349
6.8.3 Manage Kubernetes RBAC users with Google Groups for GKE (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 352
6.8.4 Ensure Legacy Authorization (ABAC) is Disabled (Scored) .............................. 354
6.9 Storage ................................................................................................................................................... 357
6.9.1 Enable Customer-Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK) for GKE Persistent
Disks (PD) (Not Scored) ............................................................................................................... 357
6.10 Other Cluster Configurations ..................................................................................................... 361
10 | P a g e
6.10.1 Ensure Kubernetes Web UI is Disabled (Scored) ................................................ 361
6.10.2 Ensure that Alpha clusters are not used for production workloads (Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 364
6.10.3 Ensure Pod Security Policy is Enabled and set as appropriate (Not Scored)
................................................................................................................................................................. 366
6.10.4 Consider GKE Sandbox for running untrusted workloads (Not Scored) .. 369
6.10.5 Ensure use of Binary Authorization (Scored) ....................................................... 373
6.10.6 Enable Cloud Security Command Center (Cloud SCC) (Not Scored) ........... 376
Appendix: Summary Table ............................................................................................................................. 379
Appendix: Change History .............................................................................................................................. 387
11 | P a g e
Overview
This document provides prescriptive guidance for running Google Kubernetes Engine
(GKE) v1.15 following recommended security controls. This benchmark only includes
controls which can be modified by an end user of GKE. For information on GKE's
performance against the Kubernetes CIS benchmarks, for items which cannot be audited or
modified, see the GKE documentation at https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-
engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks.
For the latest GKE hardening guide, see g.co/gke/hardening.
To obtain the latest version of this guide, please visit www.cisecurity.org. If you have
questions, comments, or have identified ways to improve this guide, please write us at
[email protected].
Intended Audience
This document is intended for cluster administrators, security specialists, auditors, and any
personnel who plan to develop, deploy, assess, or secure solutions that incorporate Google
Kubernetes Engine (GKE).
Consensus Guidance
This benchmark was created using a consensus review process comprised of subject
matter experts. Consensus participants provide perspective from a diverse set of
backgrounds including consulting, software development, audit and compliance, security
research, operations, government, and legal.
Each CIS benchmark undergoes two phases of consensus review. The first phase occurs
during initial benchmark development. During this phase, subject matter experts convene
to discuss, create, and test working drafts of the benchmark. This discussion occurs until
consensus has been reached on benchmark recommendations. The second phase begins
after the benchmark has been published. During this phase, all feedback provided by the
Internet community is reviewed by the consensus team for incorporation in the
benchmark. If you are interested in participating in the consensus process, please visit
https://workbench.cisecurity.org/.
12 | P a g e
Typographical Conventions
The following typographical conventions are used throughout this guide:
Convention Meaning
Stylized Monospace font Used for blocks of code, command, and script examples.
Text should be interpreted exactly as presented.
Monospace font Used for inline code, commands, or examples. Text should
be interpreted exactly as presented.
<italic font in brackets> Italic texts set in angle brackets denote a variable
requiring substitution for a real value.
Scoring Information
A scoring status indicates whether compliance with the given recommendation impacts the
assessed target's benchmark score. The following scoring statuses are used in this
benchmark:
Scored
Failure to comply with "Scored" recommendations will decrease the final benchmark score.
Compliance with "Scored" recommendations will increase the final benchmark score.
Not Scored
Failure to comply with "Not Scored" recommendations will not decrease the final
benchmark score. Compliance with "Not Scored" recommendations will not increase the
final benchmark score.
13 | P a g e
Profile Definitions
The following configuration profiles are defined by this Benchmark:
• Level 1
These recommendations are widely applicable to almost all use cases for GKE, and
should generally be applied.
• Level 2
This profile extends the "Level 1" profile. Items in this profile exhibit one or more of
the following characteristics:
These recommendations may only be recommended for some use cases in GKE, such
as multi-tenant clusters. They are not always practical recommendations and may
adversely impact other aspects of your workload, such as performance or
manageability.
14 | P a g e
Acknowledgements
This benchmark exemplifies the great things a community of users, vendors, and subject matter
experts can accomplish through consensus collaboration. The CIS community thanks the entire
consensus team with special recognition to the following individuals who contributed greatly to
the creation of this guide:
Authors
Andrew Martin
Rowan Baker
Kevin Ward
Contributors
Rory Mccune
Jordan Liggitt
Liz Rice
Maya Kaczorowski
Mark Wolters
Mike Wicks GCIH, GSEC, GSLC, GCFE, ECSA
Iulia Ion
Andrew Kiggins
Greg Castle
Randall Mowen
15 | P a g e
Recommendations
1 Control Plane Components
This section consists of security recommendations for the direct configuration of
Kubernetes control plane processes. These recommendations may not be directly
applicable for cluster operators in environments where these components are managed by
a 3rd party.
16 | P a g e
1.1 Master Node Configuration Files
1.1.1 Ensure that the API server pod specification file permissions are
set to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the API server pod specification file has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The API server pod specification file controls various parameters that set the behavior of
the API server. You should restrict its file permissions to maintain the integrity of the file.
The file should be writable by only the administrators on the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
17 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
18 | P a g e
1.1.2 Ensure that the API server pod specification file ownership is set to
root:root (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the API server pod specification file ownership is set to root:root.
Rationale:
The API server pod specification file controls various parameters that set the behavior of
the API server. You should set its file ownership to maintain the integrity of the file. The file
should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
19 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
20 | P a g e
1.1.3 Ensure that the controller manager pod specification file
permissions are set to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the controller manager pod specification file has permissions of 644 or more
restrictive.
Rationale:
The controller manager pod specification file controls various parameters that set the
behavior of the Controller Manager on the master node. You should restrict its file
permissions to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be writable by only the
administrators on the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
21 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
22 | P a g e
1.1.4 Ensure that the controller manager pod specification file
ownership is set to root:root (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the controller manager pod specification file ownership is set to root:root.
Rationale:
The controller manager pod specification file controls various parameters that set the
behavior of various components of the master node. You should set its file ownership to
maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
23 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
24 | P a g e
1.1.5 Ensure that the scheduler pod specification file permissions are set
to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the scheduler pod specification file has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The scheduler pod specification file controls various parameters that set the behavior of
the Scheduler service in the master node. You should restrict its file permissions to
maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be writable by only the administrators on
the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-scheduler/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
25 | P a g e
organization's approved configuration standards. Any new system deployment or existing
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
26 | P a g e
1.1.6 Ensure that the scheduler pod specification file ownership is set to
root:root (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the scheduler pod specification file ownership is set to root:root.
Rationale:
The scheduler pod specification file controls various parameters that set the behavior of
the kube-scheduler service in the master node. You should set its file ownership to
maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-scheduler/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
27 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
28 | P a g e
1.1.7 Ensure that the etcd pod specification file permissions are set to
644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
29 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
30 | P a g e
1.1.8 Ensure that the etcd pod specification file ownership is set to
root:root (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
31 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
32 | P a g e
1.1.9 Ensure that the Container Network Interface file permissions are
set to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the Container Network Interface files have permissions of 644 or more
restrictive.
Rationale:
Container Network Interface provides various networking options for overlay networking.
You should consult their documentation and restrict their respective file permissions to
maintain the integrity of those files. Those files should be writable by only the
administrators on the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/networking/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
33 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
34 | P a g e
1.1.10 Ensure that the Container Network Interface file ownership is set
to root:root (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the Container Network Interface files have ownership set to root:root.
Rationale:
Container Network Interface provides various networking options for overlay networking.
You should consult their documentation and restrict their respective file permissions to
maintain the integrity of those files. Those files should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/networking/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
35 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
36 | P a g e
1.1.11 Ensure that the etcd data directory permissions are set to 700 or
more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the etcd data directory has permissions of 700 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/configuration.html#data-dir
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
37 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
38 | P a g e
1.1.12 Ensure that the etcd data directory ownership is set to etcd:etcd
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/configuration.html#data-dir
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
39 | P a g e
organization's approved configuration standards. Any new system deployment or existing
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
40 | P a g e
1.1.13 Ensure that the admin.conf file permissions are set to 644 or
more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the admin.conf file has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The admin.conf is the administrator kubeconfig file defining various settings for the
administration of the cluster. You should restrict its file permissions to maintain the
integrity of the file. The file should be writable by only the administrators on the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/independent/create-cluster-kubeadm/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
41 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
42 | P a g e
1.1.14 Ensure that the admin.conf file ownership is set to root:root (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The admin.conf file contains the admin credentials for the cluster. You should set its file
ownership to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubeadm/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
43 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
44 | P a g e
1.1.15 Ensure that the scheduler.conf file permissions are set to 644 or
more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the scheduler.conf file has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The scheduler.conf file is the kubeconfig file for the Scheduler. You should restrict its file
permissions to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be writable by only the
administrators on the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/independent/create-cluster-kubeadm/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
45 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
46 | P a g e
1.1.16 Ensure that the scheduler.conf file ownership is set to root:root
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The scheduler.conf file is the kubeconfig file for the Scheduler. You should set its file
ownership to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubeadm/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
47 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
48 | P a g e
1.1.17 Ensure that the controller-manager.conf file permissions are set
to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the controller-manager.conf file has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The controller-manager.conf file is the kubeconfig file for the Controller Manager. You
should restrict its file permissions to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be
writable by only the administrators on the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
49 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
50 | P a g e
1.1.18 Ensure that the controller-manager.conf file ownership is set to
root:root (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The controller-manager.conf file is the kubeconfig file for the Controller Manager. You
should set its file ownership to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be owned
by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
51 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
52 | P a g e
1.1.19 Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI directory and file ownership is set
to root:root (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI directory and file ownership is set to root:root.
Rationale:
Kubernetes makes use of a number of certificates as part of its operation. You should set
the ownership of the directory containing the PKI information and all files in that directory
to maintain their integrity. The directory and files should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
53 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
54 | P a g e
1.1.20 Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI certificate file permissions are set
to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that Kubernetes PKI certificate files have permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
Kubernetes makes use of a number of certificate files as part of the operation of its
components. The permissions on these files should be set to 644 or more restrictive to
protect their integrity.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
55 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
56 | P a g e
1.1.21 Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI key file permissions are set to 600
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Kubernetes makes use of a number of key files as part of the operation of its components.
The permissions on these files should be set to 600 to protect their integrity and
confidentiality.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
57 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
58 | P a g e
1.2 API Server
This section contains recommendations relating to API server configuration flags
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
When enabled, requests that are not rejected by other configured authentication methods
are treated as anonymous requests. These requests are then served by the API server. You
should rely on authentication to authorize access and disallow anonymous requests.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
59 | P a g e
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authentication/#anonymous-requests
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
60 | P a g e
1.2.2 Ensure that the --basic-auth-file argument is not set (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Basic authentication uses plaintext credentials for authentication. Currently, the basic
authentication credentials last indefinitely, and the password cannot be changed without
restarting the API server. The basic authentication is currently supported for convenience.
Hence, basic authentication should not be used.
Audit:
Although the use of the --basic-auth-file argument cannot be audited on GKE, you can
verify the use of basic authentication. See Recommendation 6.8.1.
Remediation:
Although the use of the --basic-auth-file argument cannot be audited on GKE, you can
remediate the use of basic authentication. See Recommendation 6.8.1.
Impact:
You will have to configure and use alternate authentication mechanisms such as tokens and
certificates. Username and password for basic authentication could no longer be used.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authentication/#static-password-file
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
61 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
62 | P a g e
1.2.3 Ensure that the --token-auth-file parameter is not set (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
You will have to configure and use alternate authentication mechanisms such as
certificates. Static token-based authentication could not be used.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authentication/#static-token-file
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
64 | P a g e
1.2.4 Ensure that the --kubelet-https argument is set to true (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Connections from apiserver to kubelets could potentially carry sensitive data such as
secrets and keys. It is thus important to use in-transit encryption for any communication
between the apiserver and kubelets.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
66 | P a g e
1.2.5 Ensure that the --kubelet-client-certificate and --kubelet-client-key
arguments are set as appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The apiserver, by default, does not authenticate itself to the kubelet's HTTPS endpoints.
The requests from the apiserver are treated anonymously. You should set up certificate-
based kubelet authentication to ensure that the apiserver authenticates itself to kubelets
when submitting requests.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/master-node-
communication/#apiserver---kubelet
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
67 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
68 | P a g e
1.2.6 Ensure that the --kubelet-certificate-authority argument is set as
appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The connections from the apiserver to the kubelet are used for fetching logs for pods,
attaching (through kubectl) to running pods, and using the kubelet’s port-forwarding
functionality. These connections terminate at the kubelet’s HTTPS endpoint. By default, the
apiserver does not verify the kubelet’s serving certificate, which makes the connection
subject to man-in-the-middle attacks, and unsafe to run over untrusted and/or public
networks.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/master-node-
communication/#apiserver---kubelet
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
69 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
70 | P a g e
1.2.7 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument is not set to
AlwaysAllow (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The API Server can be configured to allow all requests. This mode should not be used on
any production cluster.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
71 | P a g e
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
72 | P a g e
1.2.8 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument includes Node
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The Node authorization mode only allows kubelets to read Secret, ConfigMap,
PersistentVolume, and PersistentVolumeClaim objects associated with their nodes.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/node/
3. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/46076
4. https://acotten.com/post/kube17-security
5. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
73 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
74 | P a g e
1.2.9 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument includes RBAC
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Role Based Access Control (RBAC) allows fine-grained control over the operations that
different entities can perform on different objects in the cluster. It is recommended to use
the RBAC authorization mode.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
When RBAC is enabled you will need to ensure that appropriate RBAC settings (including
Roles, RoleBindings and ClusterRoleBindings) are configured to allow appropriate access.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
75 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
76 | P a g e
1.2.10 Ensure that the admission control plugin EventRateLimit is set
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Using EventRateLimit admission control enforces a limit on the number of events that the
API Server will accept in a given time slice. A misbehaving workload could overwhelm and
DoS the API Server, making it unavailable. This particularly applies to a multi-tenant
cluster, where there might be a small percentage of misbehaving tenants which could have
a significant impact on the performance of the cluster overall. Hence, it is recommended to
limit the rate of events that the API server will accept.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/admission-controllers/#eventratelimit
3. https://github.com/staebler/community/blob/9873b632f4d99b5d99c38c9b15fe2f
8b93d0a746/contributors/design-
proposals/admission_control_event_rate_limit.md
77 | P a g e
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
78 | P a g e
1.2.11 Ensure that the admission control plugin AlwaysAdmit is not set
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Setting admission control plugin AlwaysAdmit allows all requests and do not filter any
requests.
The AlwaysAdmit admission controller was deprecated in Kubernetes v1.13. Its behavior
was equivalent to turning off all admission controllers.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Only requests explicitly allowed by the admissions control plugins would be served.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/admission-controllers/#alwaysadmit
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
79 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
80 | P a g e
1.2.12 Ensure that the admission control plugin AlwaysPullImages is set
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Setting admission control policy to AlwaysPullImages forces every new pod to pull the
required images every time. In a multi-tenant cluster, users can be assured that their
private images can only be used by those who have the credentials to pull them. Without
this admission control policy, once an image has been pulled to a node, any pod from any
user can use it simply by knowing the image’s name, without any authorization check
against the image ownership. When this plug-in is enabled, images are always pulled prior
to starting containers, which means valid credentials are required.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Credentials would be required to pull the private images every time. Also, in trusted
environments, this might increase load on network, registry, and decreases speed.
This setting could impact offline or isolated clusters, which have images pre-loaded and do
not have access to a registry to pull in-use images. This setting is not appropriate for
clusters which use this configuration.
Default Value:
81 | P a g e
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/admission-controllers/#alwayspullimages
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
82 | P a g e
1.2.13 Ensure that the admission control plugin SecurityContextDeny is
set if PodSecurityPolicy is not used (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
The SecurityContextDeny admission controller can be used to deny pods which make use of
some SecurityContext fields which could allow for privilege escalation in the cluster. This
should be used where PodSecurityPolicy is not in place within the cluster.
Rationale:
SecurityContextDeny can be used to provide a layer of security for clusters which do not
have PodSecurityPolicies enabled.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
This admission controller should only be used where Pod Security Policies cannot be used
on the cluster, as it can interact poorly with certain Pod Security Policies
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/admission-controllers/#securitycontextdeny
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/pod-security-policy/#working-with-rbac
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
83 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
84 | P a g e
1.2.14 Ensure that the admission control plugin ServiceAccount is set
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
When you create a pod, if you do not specify a service account, it is automatically assigned
the default service account in the same namespace. You should create your own service
account and let the API server manage its security tokens.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/admission-controllers/#serviceaccount
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-service-
account/
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
85 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
86 | P a g e
1.2.15 Ensure that the admission control plugin NamespaceLifecycle is
set (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/admission-controllers/#namespacelifecycle
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
87 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
88 | P a g e
1.2.16 Ensure that the admission control plugin PodSecurityPolicy is set
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
A Pod Security Policy is a cluster-level resource that controls the actions that a pod can
perform and what it has the ability to access. The PodSecurityPolicy objects define a set of
conditions that a pod must run with in order to be accepted into the system. Pod Security
Policies are comprised of settings and strategies that control the security features a pod has
access to and hence this must be used to control pod access permissions.
Note: When the PodSecurityPolicy admission plugin is in use, there needs to be at least one
PodSecurityPolicy in place for ANY pods to be admitted. See section 5.2 for
recommendations on PodSecurityPolicy settings.
Audit:
Remediation:
To verify and remediate the use of Pod Security Policy on GKE, see Recommendation 6.10.3.
Impact:
The policy objects must be created and granted before pod creation would be allowed.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
89 | P a g e
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/admission-controllers/#podsecuritypolicy
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy/#enabling-pod-
security-policies
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
90 | P a g e
1.2.17 Ensure that the admission control plugin NodeRestriction is set
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Limit the Node and Pod objects that a kubelet could modify.
Rationale:
Using the NodeRestriction plug-in ensures that the kubelet is restricted to the Node and
Pod objects that it could modify as defined. Such kubelets will only be allowed to modify
their own Node API object, and only modify Pod API objects that are bound to their node.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/admission-controllers/#noderestriction
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/node/
4. https://acotten.com/post/kube17-security
5. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
91 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
92 | P a g e
1.2.18 Ensure that the --insecure-bind-address argument is not set (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
If you bind the apiserver to an insecure address, basically anyone who could connect to it
over the insecure port, would have unauthenticated and unencrypted access to your
master node. The apiserver doesn't do any authentication checking for insecure binds and
traffic to the Insecure API port is not encrypted, allowing attackers to potentially read
sensitive data in transit.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
93 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
94 | P a g e
1.2.19 Ensure that the --insecure-port argument is set to 0 (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Setting up the apiserver to serve on an insecure port would allow unauthenticated and
unencrypted access to your master node. This would allow attackers who could access this
port, to easily take control of the cluster.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
All components that use the API must connect via the secured port, authenticate
themselves, and be authorized to use the API.
This includes:
• kube-controller-manager
• kube-proxy
• kube-scheduler
• kubelets
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
95 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
96 | P a g e
1.2.20 Ensure that the --secure-port argument is not set to 0 (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The secure port is used to serve https with authentication and authorization. If you disable
it, no https traffic is served, and all traffic is served unencrypted.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
You need to set the API Server up with the right TLS certificates.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
97 | P a g e
Version 7
98 | P a g e
1.2.21 Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/profi
ling.md
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
99 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
100 | P a g e
1.2.22 Ensure that the --audit-log-path argument is set (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Enable auditing on the Kubernetes API Server and set the desired audit log path.
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/audit/
3. https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/22
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
101 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
6.2 Ensure Audit Log Settings Support Appropriate Log Entry Formatting
Validate audit log settings for each hardware device and the software installed on it,
ensuring that logs include a date, timestamp, source addresses, destination addresses, and
various other useful elements of each packet and/or transaction. Systems should record
logs in a standardized format such as syslog entries or those outlined by the Common Event
Expression initiative. If systems cannot generate logs in a standardized format, log
normalization tools can be deployed to convert logs into such a format.
Version 7
102 | P a g e
1.2.23 Ensure that the --audit-log-maxage argument is set to 30 or as
appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Retaining logs for at least 30 days ensures that you can go back in time and investigate or
correlate any events. Set your audit log retention period to 30 days or as per your business
requirements.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/audit/
3. https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/22
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
103 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
6.3 Ensure Audit Logging Systems Are Not Subject To Loss (i.e. rotation/archive)
Ensure that all systems that store logs have adequate storage space for the logs
generated on a regular basis, so that log files will not fill up between log rotation intervals.
The logs must be archived and digitally signed on a periodic basis.
Version 7
104 | P a g e
1.2.24 Ensure that the --audit-log-maxbackup argument is set to 10 or
as appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Kubernetes automatically rotates the log files. Retaining old log files ensures that you
would have sufficient log data available for carrying out any investigation or correlation.
For example, if you have set file size of 100 MB and the number of old log files to keep as
10, you would approximate have 1 GB of log data that you could potentially use for your
analysis.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/audit/
3. https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/22
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
105 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
6.3 Ensure Audit Logging Systems Are Not Subject To Loss (i.e. rotation/archive)
Ensure that all systems that store logs have adequate storage space for the logs
generated on a regular basis, so that log files will not fill up between log rotation intervals.
The logs must be archived and digitally signed on a periodic basis.
Version 7
106 | P a g e
1.2.25 Ensure that the --audit-log-maxsize argument is set to 100 or as
appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Kubernetes automatically rotates the log files. Retaining old log files ensures that you
would have sufficient log data available for carrying out any investigation or correlation. If
you have set file size of 100 MB and the number of old log files to keep as 10, you would
approximate have 1 GB of log data that you could potentially use for your analysis.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/audit/
3. https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/22
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
107 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
6.3 Ensure Audit Logging Systems Are Not Subject To Loss (i.e. rotation/archive)
Ensure that all systems that store logs have adequate storage space for the logs
generated on a regular basis, so that log files will not fill up between log rotation intervals.
The logs must be archived and digitally signed on a periodic basis.
Version 7
108 | P a g e
1.2.26 Ensure that the --request-timeout argument is set as appropriate
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Setting global request timeout allows extending the API server request timeout limit to a
duration appropriate to the user's connection speed. By default, it is set to 60 seconds
which might be problematic on slower connections making cluster resources inaccessible
once the data volume for requests exceeds what can be transmitted in 60 seconds. But,
setting this timeout limit to be too large can exhaust the API server resources making it
prone to Denial-of-Service attack. Hence, it is recommended to set this limit as appropriate
and change the default limit of 60 seconds only if needed.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/51415
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
109 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
110 | P a g e
1.2.27 Ensure that the --service-account-lookup argument is set to true
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24167
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_of_check_to_time_of_use
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
111 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
112 | P a g e
1.2.28 Ensure that the --service-account-key-file argument is set as
appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Explicitly set a service account public key file for service accounts on the apiserver.
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
The corresponding private key must be provided to the controller manager. You would
need to securely maintain the key file and rotate the keys based on your organization's key
rotation policy.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24167
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
113 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
114 | P a g e
1.2.29 Ensure that the --etcd-certfile and --etcd-keyfile arguments are
set as appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
etcd should be configured to make use of TLS encryption for client connections.
Rationale:
etcd is a highly-available key value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should be
protected by client authentication. This requires the API server to identify itself to the etcd
server using a client certificate and key.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/security.html
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
115 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
116 | P a g e
1.2.30 Ensure that the --tls-cert-file and --tls-private-key-file arguments
are set as appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
API server communication contains sensitive parameters that should remain encrypted in
transit. Configure the API server to serve only HTTPS traffic.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
TLS and client certificate authentication must be configured for your Kubernetes cluster
deployment.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. http://rootsquash.com/2016/05/10/securing-the-kubernetes-api/
3. https://github.com/kelseyhightower/docker-kubernetes-tls-guide
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
117 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
118 | P a g e
1.2.31 Ensure that the --client-ca-file argument is set as appropriate
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
API server communication contains sensitive parameters that should remain encrypted in
transit. Configure the API server to serve only HTTPS traffic. If --client-ca-file
argument is set, any request presenting a client certificate signed by one of the authorities
in the client-ca-file is authenticated with an identity corresponding to the
CommonName of the client certificate.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
TLS and client certificate authentication must be configured for your Kubernetes cluster
deployment.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. http://rootsquash.com/2016/05/10/securing-the-kubernetes-api/
3. https://github.com/kelseyhightower/docker-kubernetes-tls-guide
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
119 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
120 | P a g e
1.2.32 Ensure that the --etcd-cafile argument is set as appropriate (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
etcd should be configured to make use of TLS encryption for client connections.
Rationale:
etcd is a highly-available key value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should be
protected by client authentication. This requires the API server to identify itself to the etcd
server using a SSL Certificate Authority file.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
2. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/security.html
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
121 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
122 | P a g e
1.2.33 Ensure that the --encryption-provider-config argument is set as
appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
etcd is a highly available key-value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should be
encrypted at rest to avoid any disclosures.
Audit:
Although the use of EncryptionConfig cannot be directly audited on GKE, you can
configure options for secret encryption. See Recommendation 6.3.1.
Remediation:
To verify and remediate the use of secret encryption on GKE, see Recommendation 6.3.1.
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/encrypt-data/
2. https://acotten.com/post/kube17-security
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
4. https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/92
5. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
123 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
124 | P a g e
1.2.34 Ensure that encryption providers are appropriately configured
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Where etcd encryption is used, it is important to ensure that the appropriate set of
encryption providers is used. Currently, the aescbc, kms and secretbox are likely to be
appropriate options.
Audit:
Although the use of EncryptionConfig cannot be directly audited on GKE, you can
configure options for secret encryption. See Recommendation 6.3.1.
Note: Only kms is available as an encryption provider on GKE.
Remediation:
To verify and remediate the use of secret encryption on GKE, see Recommendation 6.3.1.
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/encrypt-data/
2. https://acotten.com/post/kube17-security
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-apiserver/
4. https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/92
5. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/encrypt-data/#providers
6. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
125 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
126 | P a g e
1.2.35 Ensure that the API Server only makes use of Strong
Cryptographic Ciphers (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the API server is configured to only use strong cryptographic ciphers.
Rationale:
TLS ciphers have had a number of known vulnerabilities and weaknesses, which can
reduce the protection provided by them. By default, Kubernetes supports a number of TLS
ciphersuites including some that have security concerns, weakening the protection
provided.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
API server clients that cannot support modern cryptographic ciphers will not be able to
make connections to the API server.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://github.com/ssllabs/research/wiki/SSL-and-TLS-Deployment-Best-
Practices#23-use-secure-cipher-suites
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
127 | P a g e
Notes:
The list chosen above should be fine for modern clients. It's essentially the list from the
Mozilla "Modern cipher" option with the ciphersuites supporting CBC mode removed, as
CBC has traditionally had a lot of issues
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
128 | P a g e
1.3 Controller Manager
This section contains recommendations relating to Controller Manager configuration flags
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/28484
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
129 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
130 | P a g e
1.3.2 Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/profi
ling.md
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
131 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
132 | P a g e
1.3.3 Ensure that the --use-service-account-credentials argument is set
to true (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The controller manager creates a service account per controller in the kube-system
namespace, generates a credential for it, and builds a dedicated API client with that service
account credential for each controller loop to use. Setting the --use-service-account-
credentials to true runs each control loop within the controller manager using a separate
service account credential. When used in combination with RBAC, this ensures that the
control loops run with the minimum permissions required to perform their intended tasks.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Whatever authorizer is configured for the cluster, it must grant sufficient permissions to
the service accounts to perform their intended tasks. When using the RBAC authorizer,
those roles are created and bound to the appropriate service accounts in the kube-system
namespace automatically with default roles and rolebindings that are auto-reconciled on
startup.
If using other authorization methods (ABAC, Webhook, etc), the cluster deployer is
responsible for granting appropriate permissions to the service accounts (the required
permissions can be seen by inspecting the controller-roles.yaml and controller-role-
bindings.yaml files for the RBAC roles.
Default Value:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/service-accounts-admin/
3. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-
1.6/plugin/pkg/auth/authorizer/rbac/bootstrappolicy/testdata/controller-
roles.yaml
4. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-
1.6/plugin/pkg/auth/authorizer/rbac/bootstrappolicy/testdata/controller-role-
bindings.yaml
5. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/rbac/#controller-roles
6. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
134 | P a g e
1.3.4 Ensure that the --service-account-private-key-file argument is set
as appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Explicitly set a service account private key file for service accounts on the controller
manager.
Rationale:
To ensure that keys for service account tokens can be rotated as needed, a separate
public/private key pair should be used for signing service account tokens. The private key
should be specified to the controller manager with --service-account-private-key-file
as appropriate.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
You would need to securely maintain the key file and rotate the keys based on your
organization's key rotation policy.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
135 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
136 | P a g e
1.3.5 Ensure that the --root-ca-file argument is set as appropriate (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Allow pods to verify the API server's serving certificate before establishing connections.
Rationale:
Processes running within pods that need to contact the API server must verify the API
server's serving certificate. Failing to do so could be a subject to man-in-the-middle attacks.
Providing the root certificate for the API server's serving certificate to the controller
manager with the --root-ca-file argument allows the controller manager to inject the
trusted bundle into pods so that they can verify TLS connections to the API server.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/11000
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
137 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
138 | P a g e
1.3.6 Ensure that the RotateKubeletServerCertificate argument is set to
true (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
Note: This recommendation only applies if you let kubelets get their certificates from the
API server. In case your kubelet certificates come from an outside authority/tool (e.g.
Vault) then you need to take care of rotation yourself.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-tls-bootstrapping/#approval-controller
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/267
3. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/45059
4. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-controller-manager/
5. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
139 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
140 | P a g e
1.3.7 Ensure that the --bind-address argument is set to 127.0.0.1 (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The Controller Manager API service which runs on port 10252/TCP by default is used for
health and metrics information and is available without authentication or encryption. As
such it should only be bound to a localhost interface, to minimize the cluster's attack
surface
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kube-
controller-manager/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
Notes:
Although the current Kubernetes documentation site says that --address is deprecated in
favor of --bind-address Kubeadm 1.11 still makes use of --address
141 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
142 | P a g e
1.4 Scheduler
This section contains recommendations relating to Scheduler configuration flags
1.4.1 Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-scheduler/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/profi
ling.md
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
143 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
144 | P a g e
1.4.2 Ensure that the --bind-address argument is set to 127.0.0.1 (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The Scheduler API service which runs on port 10251/TCP by default is used for health and
metrics information and is available without authentication or encryption. As such it
should only be bound to a localhost interface, to minimize the cluster's attack surface
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kube-
scheduler/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
145 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
146 | P a g e
2 etcd
This section covers recommendations for etcd configuration.
2.1 Ensure that the --cert-file and --key-file arguments are set as
appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
etcd is a highly-available key value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should be
encrypted in transit.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/security.html
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
147 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
148 | P a g e
2.2 Ensure that the --client-cert-auth argument is set to true (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
etcd is a highly-available key value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should not
be available to unauthenticated clients. You should enable the client authentication via
valid certificates to secure the access to the etcd service.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
All clients attempting to access the etcd server will require a valid client certificate.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/security.html
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/configuration.html#client-cert-auth
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
149 | P a g e
Version 7
150 | P a g e
2.3 Ensure that the --auto-tls argument is not set to true (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
etcd is a highly-available key value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should not
be available to unauthenticated clients. You should enable the client authentication via
valid certificates to secure the access to the etcd service.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/security.html
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/configuration.html#auto-tls
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
151 | P a g e
encrypted. Whenever information flows over a network with a lower trust level, the
information should be encrypted.
Version 7
152 | P a g e
2.4 Ensure that the --peer-cert-file and --peer-key-file arguments are set
as appropriate (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
etcd should be configured to make use of TLS encryption for peer connections.
Rationale:
etcd is a highly-available key value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should be
encrypted in transit and also amongst peers in the etcd clusters.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
etcd cluster peers would need to set up TLS for their communication.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/security.html
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
153 | P a g e
encrypted. Whenever information flows over a network with a lower trust level, the
information should be encrypted.
Version 7
154 | P a g e
2.5 Ensure that the --peer-client-cert-auth argument is set to true (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
etcd is a highly-available key value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should be
accessible only by authenticated etcd peers in the etcd cluster.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
All peers attempting to communicate with the etcd server will require a valid client
certificate for authentication.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/security.html
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/configuration.html#peer-client-
cert-auth
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
155 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
156 | P a g e
2.6 Ensure that the --peer-auto-tls argument is not set to true (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Do not use automatically generated self-signed certificates for TLS connections between
peers.
Rationale:
etcd is a highly-available key value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. These objects are sensitive in nature and should be
accessible only by authenticated etcd peers in the etcd cluster. Hence, do not use self-
signed certificates for authentication.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
All peers attempting to communicate with the etcd server will require a valid client
certificate for authentication.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/security.html
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/etcd/
3. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/configuration.html#peer-auto-tls
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
157 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
158 | P a g e
2.7 Ensure that a unique Certificate Authority is used for etcd (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Use a different certificate authority for etcd from the one used for Kubernetes.
Rationale:
etcd is a highly available key-value store used by Kubernetes deployments for persistent
storage of all of its REST API objects. Its access should be restricted to specifically
designated clients and peers only.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Additional management of the certificates and keys for the dedicated certificate authority
will be required.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://coreos.com/etcd/docs/latest/op-guide/security.html
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
159 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
160 | P a g e
3.1 Authentication and Authorization
3.1.1 Client certificate authentication should not be used for users (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Kubernetes provides the option to use client certificates for user authentication. However,
as there is no way to revoke these certificates when a user leaves an organization or loses
their credential, they are not suitable for this purpose.
It is not possible to fully disable client certificate use within a cluster as it is used for
component to component authentication.
Rationale:
With any authentication mechanism the ability to revoke credentials if they are
compromised or no longer required, is a key control. Kubernetes client certificate
authentication does not allow for this due to a lack of support for certificate revocation.
Audit:
Review user access to the cluster and ensure that users are not making use of Kubernetes
client certificate authentication.
You can verify the availability of client certificates in your GKE cluster. See
Recommendation 6.8.2.
Remediation:
Impact:
161 | P a g e
External mechanisms for authentication generally require additional software to be
deployed.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
Notes:
The lack of certificate revocation was flagged up as a high-risk issue in the recent
Kubernetes security audit. Without this feature, client certificate authentication is not
suitable for end users.
CIS Controls:
Version 7
162 | P a g e
3.2 Logging
3.2.1 Ensure that a minimal audit policy is created (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Kubernetes can audit the details of requests made to the API server. The --audit-policy-
file flag must be set for this logging to be enabled.
Rationale:
Logging is an important detective control for all systems, to detect potential unauthorized
access.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Audit logs will be created on the master nodes, which will consume disk space. Care should
be taken to avoid generating too large volumes of log information as this could impact the
available of the cluster nodes.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/debug-application-cluster/audit/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
163 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
164 | P a g e
3.2.2 Ensure that the audit policy covers key security concerns (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Ensure that the audit policy created for the cluster covers key security concerns.
Rationale:
Security audit logs should cover access and modification of key resources in the cluster, to
enable them to form an effective part of a security environment.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Increasing audit logging will consume resources on the nodes or other log destination.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://github.com/k8scop/k8s-security-
dashboard/blob/master/configs/kubernetes/adv-audit.yaml
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/debug-application-cluster/audit/#audit-policy
3. https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco/blob/master/examples/k8s_audit_config/a
udit-policy.yaml
4. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/cluster/gce/gci/configur
e-helper.sh#L735
5. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
165 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
166 | P a g e
4 Worker Nodes
This section consists of security recommendations for the components that run on
Kubernetes worker nodes.
Note that these components may also run on Kubernetes master nodes, so the
recommendations in this section should be applied to master nodes as well as worker
nodes where the master nodes make use of these components.
167 | P a g e
4.1 Worker Node Configuration Files
This section covers recommendations for configuration files on the worker nodes.
4.1.1 Ensure that the kubelet service file permissions are set to 644 or
more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the kubelet service file has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The kubelet service file controls various parameters that set the behavior of the kubelet
service in the worker node. You should restrict its file permissions to maintain the integrity
of the file. The file should be writable by only the administrators on the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/independent/create-cluster-kubeadm/#44-
joining-your-nodes
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubeadm/#kubelet-drop-in
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
168 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
169 | P a g e
4.1.2 Ensure that the kubelet service file ownership is set to root:root
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The kubelet service file controls various parameters that set the behavior of the kubelet
service in the worker node. You should set its file ownership to maintain the integrity of the
file. The file should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/independent/create-cluster-kubeadm/#44-
joining-your-nodes
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubeadm/#kubelet-drop-in
4. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
170 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
171 | P a g e
4.1.3 Ensure that the proxy kubeconfig file permissions are set to 644 or
more restrictive (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
If kube-proxy is running, and if it is using a file-based kubeconfig file, ensure that the proxy
kubeconfig file has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The kube-proxy kubeconfig file controls various parameters of the kube-proxy service in
the worker node. You should restrict its file permissions to maintain the integrity of the file.
The file should be writable by only the administrators on the system.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate kubeconfig file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --kubeconfig
/var/lib/kube-proxy/kubeconfig which is the location of the kubeconfig file.
Run this command to obtain the kubeconfig file permissions:
172 | P a g e
stat -c %a /var/lib/kube-proxy/kubeconfig
The output of the above command gives you the kubeconfig file's permissions.
Verify that if a file is specified and it exists, the permissions are 644 or more restrictive.
Remediation:
Run the below command (based on the file location on your system) on each worker
node. For example,
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-proxy/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
173 | P a g e
4.1.4 Ensure that the proxy kubeconfig file ownership is set to root:root
(Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
If kube-proxy is running, ensure that the file ownership of its kubeconfig file is set to
root:root.
Rationale:
The kubeconfig file for kube-proxy controls various parameters for the kube-proxy service
in the worker node. You should set its file ownership to maintain the integrity of the file.
The file should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate kubeconfig file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --kubeconfig
/var/lib/kube-proxy/kubeconfig which is the location of the kubeconfig file.
Run this command to obtain the kubeconfig file ownership:
174 | P a g e
The output of the above command gives you the kubeconfig file's ownership. Verify that the
ownership is set to root:root.
Remediation:
Run the below command (based on the file location on your system) on each worker node.
For example,
Impact:
None
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kube-proxy/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
175 | P a g e
4.1.5 Ensure that the kubelet.conf file permissions are set to 644 or
more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the kubelet.conf file has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The kubelet.conf file is the kubeconfig file for the node, and controls various parameters
that set the behavior and identity of the worker node. You should restrict its file
permissions to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be writable by only the
administrators on the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
176 | P a g e
required. Implement focused auditing on the use of administrative privileged functions and
monitor for anomalous behavior.
Version 7
177 | P a g e
4.1.6 Ensure that the kubelet.conf file ownership is set to root:root (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The kubelet.conf file is the kubeconfig file for the node, and controls various parameters
that set the behavior and identity of the worker node. You should set its file ownership to
maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
178 | P a g e
required. Implement focused auditing on the use of administrative privileged functions and
monitor for anomalous behavior.
Version 7
179 | P a g e
4.1.7 Ensure that the certificate authorities file permissions are set to
644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the certificate authorities file has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The certificate authorities file controls the authorities used to validate API requests. You
should restrict its file permissions to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be
writable by only the administrators on the system.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authentication/#x509-client-certs
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
180 | P a g e
required. Implement focused auditing on the use of administrative privileged functions and
monitor for anomalous behavior.
Version 7
181 | P a g e
4.1.8 Ensure that the client certificate authorities file ownership is set to
root:root (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The certificate authorities file controls the authorities used to validate API requests. You
should set its file ownership to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be owned
by root:root.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authentication/#x509-client-certs
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
182 | P a g e
required. Implement focused auditing on the use of administrative privileged functions and
monitor for anomalous behavior.
Version 7
183 | P a g e
4.1.9 Ensure that the kubelet configuration file has permissions set to
644 or more restrictive (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that if the kubelet refers to a configuration file with the --config argument, that file
has permissions of 644 or more restrictive.
Rationale:
The kubelet reads various parameters, including security settings, from a config file
specified by the --config argument. If this file is specified you should restrict its file
permissions to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be writable by only the
administrators on the system.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Run the following command:
stat -c %a /home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml
184 | P a g e
The output of the above command is the Kubelet config file's permissions. Verify that the
permissions are 644 or more restrictive.
Remediation:
Run the following command (using the config file location identified in the Audit step)
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/kubelet-config-file/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
185 | P a g e
4.1.10 Ensure that the kubelet configuration file ownership is set to
root:root (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that if the kubelet refers to a configuration file with the --config argument, that file
is owned by root:root.
Rationale:
The kubelet reads various parameters, including security settings, from a config file
specified by the --config argument. If this file is specified you should restrict its file
permissions to maintain the integrity of the file. The file should be owned by root:root.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Run the following command:
186 | P a g e
The output of the above command is the Kubelet config file's ownership. Verify that the
ownership is set to root:root
Remediation:
Run the following command (using the config file location identified in the Audit step)
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/kubelet-config-file/
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
187 | P a g e
4.2 Kubelet
This section contains recommendations for kubelet configuration.
Kubelet settings may be configured using arguments on the running kubelet executable, or
they may be taken from a Kubelet config file. If both are specified, the executable argument
takes precedence.
If the --config argument is present, this gives the location of the Kubelet config file. This
config file could be in JSON or YAML format depending on your distribution.
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
When enabled, requests that are not rejected by other configured authentication methods
are treated as anonymous requests. These requests are then served by the Kubelet server.
You should rely on authentication to authorize access and disallow anonymous requests.
Audit:
If using a Kubelet configuration file, check that there is an entry for authentication:
anonymous: enabled set to false.
188 | P a g e
3. Note the name of the desired node
4. Go to VM Instances by visiting
https://console.cloud.google.com/compute/instances
5. Find the desired node and click on 'SSH' to open an SSH connection to the node.
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
Remediation:
If using a Kubelet config file, edit the file to set authentication: anonymous: enabled to
false.
If using executable arguments, edit the kubelet service file
/etc/systemd/system/kubelet.service.d/10-kubeadm.conf on each worker node and
set the below parameter in KUBELET_SYSTEM_PODS_ARGS variable.
--anonymous-auth=false
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
189 | P a g e
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/#kubelet-
authentication
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
190 | P a g e
4.2.2 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument is not set to
AlwaysAllow (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Kubelets, by default, allow all authenticated requests (even anonymous ones) without
needing explicit authorization checks from the apiserver. You should restrict this behavior
and only allow explicitly authorized requests.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
191 | P a g e
sets authorization: mode to something other than AlwaysAllow.
It is also possible to review the running configuration of a Kubelet via the /contigs
endpoint on the Kubelet API port (typically 10250/TCP). Accessing these with appropriate
credentials will provide details of the Kubelet's configuration.
Remediation:
If using a Kubelet config file, edit the file to set authorization: mode to Webhook.
If using executable arguments, edit the kubelet service file
/etc/systemd/system/kubelet.service.d/10-kubeadm.conf on each worker node and
set the below parameter in KUBELET_AUTHZ_ARGS variable.
--authorization-mode=Webhook
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/#kubelet-
authentication
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
192 | P a g e
4.2.3 Ensure that the --client-ca-file argument is set as appropriate
(Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The connections from the apiserver to the kubelet are used for fetching logs for pods,
attaching (through kubectl) to running pods, and using the kubelet’s port-forwarding
functionality. These connections terminate at the kubelet’s HTTPS endpoint. By default, the
apiserver does not verify the kubelet’s serving certificate, which makes the connection
subject to man-in-the-middle attacks, and unsafe to run over untrusted and/or public
networks. Enabling Kubelet certificate authentication ensures that the apiserver could
authenticate the Kubelet before submitting any requests.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
193 | P a g e
sudo vim /home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml
Verify that the --client-ca-file argument exists and is set to the location of the client
certificate authority file.
If the --client-ca-file argument is not present, check that there is a Kubelet config file
specified by --config, and that the file sets authentication: x509: clientCAFile to the
location of the client certificate authority file.
Remediation:
If using a Kubelet config file, edit the file to set authentication: x509: clientCAFile to
the location of the client CA file.
If using command line arguments, edit the kubelet service file
/etc/systemd/system/kubelet.service.d/10-kubeadm.conf on each worker node and
set the below parameter in KUBELET_AUTHZ_ARGS variable.
--client-ca-file=<path/to/client-ca-file>
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kubelet-
authentication-authorization/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
194 | P a g e
Version 7
195 | P a g e
4.2.4 Ensure that the --read-only-port argument is set to 0 (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The Kubelet process provides a read-only API in addition to the main Kubelet API.
Unauthenticated access is provided to this read-only API which could possibly retrieve
potentially sensitive information about the cluster.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
196 | P a g e
Remediation:
--read-only-port=0
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
Removal of the read-only port will require that any service which made use of it will need
to be re-configured to use the main Kubelet API.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
197 | P a g e
4.2.5 Ensure that the --streaming-connection-idle-timeout argument is
not set to 0 (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Setting idle timeouts ensures that you are protected against Denial-of-Service attacks,
inactive connections and running out of ephemeral ports.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
198 | P a g e
Verify that the --streaming-connection-idle-timeout argument is not set to 0.
If the argument is not present, and there is a Kubelet config file specified by --config,
check that it does not set streamingConnectionIdleTimeout to 0.
Remediation:
--streaming-connection-idle-timeout=5m
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/18552
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
199 | P a g e
4.2.6 Ensure that the --protect-kernel-defaults argument is set to true
(Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Protect tuned kernel parameters from overriding kubelet default kernel parameter values.
Rationale:
Kernel parameters are usually tuned and hardened by the system administrators before
putting the systems into production. These parameters protect the kernel and the system.
Your kubelet kernel defaults that rely on such parameters should be appropriately set to
match the desired secured system state. Ignoring this could potentially lead to running
pods with undesired kernel behavior.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
200 | P a g e
Verify that the --protect-kernel-defaults argument is set to true.
If the --protect-kernel-defaults argument is not present, check that there is a Kubelet
config file specified by --config, and that the file sets protectKernelDefaults to true.
Remediation:
If using a Kubelet config file, edit the file to set protectKernelDefaults: true.
If using command line arguments, edit the kubelet service file
/etc/systemd/system/kubelet.service.d/10-kubeadm.conf on each worker node and
set the below parameter in KUBELET_SYSTEM_PODS_ARGS variable.
--protect-kernel-defaults=true
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
201 | P a g e
system that becomes compromised should be imaged using one of those images or
templates.
202 | P a g e
4.2.7 Ensure that the --make-iptables-util-chains argument is set to true
(Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Kubelets can automatically manage the required changes to iptables based on how you
choose your networking options for the pods. It is recommended to let kubelets manage
the changes to iptables. This ensures that the iptables configuration remains in sync with
pods networking configuration. Manually configuring iptables with dynamic pod network
configuration changes might hamper the communication between pods/containers and to
the outside world. You might have iptables rules too restrictive or too open.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
203 | P a g e
Verify that if the --make-iptables-util-chains argument exists then it is set to true.
If the --make-iptables-util-chains argument does not exist, and there is a Kubelet config
file specified by --config, verify that the file does not set makeIPTablesUtilChains to
false.
Remediation:
If using a Kubelet config file, edit the file to set makeIPTablesUtilChains: true.
If using command line arguments, edit the kubelet service file
/etc/systemd/system/kubelet.service.d/10-kubeadm.conf on each worker node and
remove the --make-iptables-util-chains argument from the
KUBELET_SYSTEM_PODS_ARGS variable.
Based on your system, restart the kubelet service. For example:
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
Kubelet would manage the iptables on the system and keep it in sync. If you are using any
other iptables management solution, then there might be some conflicts.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
204 | P a g e
4.2.8 Ensure that the --hostname-override argument is not set (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Overriding hostnames could potentially break TLS setup between the kubelet and the
apiserver. Additionally, with overridden hostnames, it becomes increasingly difficult to
associate logs with a particular node and process them for security analytics. Hence, you
should setup your kubelet nodes with resolvable FQDNs and avoid overriding the
hostnames with IPs.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
205 | P a g e
Verify that --hostname-override argument does not exist.
Note This setting is not configurable via the Kubelet config file.
Remediation:
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
Some cloud providers may require this flag to ensure that hostname matches names issued
by the cloud provider. In these environments, this recommendation should not apply.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/22063
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
206 | P a g e
4.2.9 Ensure that the --event-qps argument is set to 0 or a level which
ensures appropriate event capture (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Security relevant information should be captured. The --event-qps flag on the Kubelet can
be used to limit the rate at which events are gathered. Setting this too low could result in
relevant events not being logged, however the unlimited setting of 0 could result in a denial
of service on the kubelet.
Rationale:
It is important to capture all events and not restrict event creation. Events are an important
source of security information and analytics that ensure that your environment is
consistently monitored using the event data.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
207 | P a g e
Review the value set for the --event-qps argument and determine whether this has been
set to an appropriate level for the cluster. The value of 0 can be used to ensure that all
events are captured.
If the --event-qps argument does not exist, check that there is a Kubelet config file
specified by --config and review the value in this location.
Remediation:
If using a Kubelet config file, edit the file to set eventRecordQPS: to an appropriate level.
If using command line arguments, edit the kubelet service file
/etc/systemd/system/kubelet.service.d/10-kubeadm.conf on each worker node and
set the below parameter in KUBELET_SYSTEM_PODS_ARGS variable.
Based on your system, restart the kubelet service. For example:
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
Setting this parameter to 0 could result in a denial of service condition due to excessive
events being created. The cluster's event processing and storage systems should be scaled
to handle expected event loads.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/kubelet/apis/kubel
etconfig/v1beta1/types.go
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
208 | P a g e
4.2.10 Ensure that the --tls-cert-file and --tls-private-key-file arguments
are set as appropriate (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
Verify that the --tls-cert-file and --tls-private-key-file arguments exist, and they
are set as appropriate.
209 | P a g e
If these arguments are not present, check that there is a Kubelet config specified by --
config and that it contains appropriate settings for tlsCertFile and tlsPrivateKeyFile.
Remediation:
If using a Kubelet config file, edit the file to set tlsCertFile to the location of the certificate
file to use to identify this Kubelet, and tlsPrivateKeyFile to the location of the
corresponding private key file.
If using command line arguments, edit the kubelet service file
/etc/systemd/system/kubelet.service.d/10-kubeadm.conf on each worker node and
set the below parameters in KUBELET_CERTIFICATE_ARGS variable.
--tls-cert-file=<path/to/tls-certificate-file> --tls-private-key-
file=<path/to/tls-key-file>
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
TLS and client certificate authentication must be configured for your Kubernetes cluster
deployment.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet/
2. http://rootsquash.com/2016/05/10/securing-the-kubernetes-api/
3. https://github.com/kelseyhightower/docker-kubernetes-tls-guide
4. https://jvns.ca/blog/2017/08/05/how-kubernetes-certificates-work/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
210 | P a g e
Version 7
211 | P a g e
4.2.11 Ensure that the --rotate-certificates argument is not set to false
(Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
The --rotate-certificates setting causes the kubelet to rotate its client certificates by
creating new CSRs as its existing credentials expire. This automated periodic rotation
ensures that the there is no downtime due to expired certificates and thus addressing
availability in the CIA security triad.
Note: This recommendation only applies if you let kubelets get their certificates from the
API server. In case your kubelet certificates come from an outside authority/tool (e.g.
Vault) then you need to take care of rotation yourself.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
212 | P a g e
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
Remediation:
If using a Kubelet config file, edit the file to add the line rotateCertificates: true or
remove it altogether to use the default value.
If using command line arguments, edit the kubelet service file
/etc/systemd/system/kubelet.service.d/10-kubeadm.conf on each worker node and
remove --rotate-certificates=false argument from the KUBELET_CERTIFICATE_ARGS
variable.
Based on your system, restart the kubelet service. For example:
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
None
Default Value:
References:
1. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41912
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kubelet-tls-
bootstrapping/#kubelet-configuration
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/imported/release/notes/
4. https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/feature-
gates/
213 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
214 | P a g e
4.2.12 Ensure that the RotateKubeletServerCertificate argument is set
to true (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Note: This recommendation only applies if you let kubelets get their certificates from the
API server. In case your kubelet certificates come from an outside authority/tool (e.g.
Vault) then you need to take care of rotation yourself.
Audit:
Run the following command on each node to find the appropriate Kubelet config file:
The output of the above command should return something similar to --config
/home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml which is the location of the Kubelet config file.
Open the Kubelet config file:
215 | P a g e
sudo vim /home/kubernetes/kubelet-config.yaml
Remediation:
--feature-gates=RotateKubeletServerCertificate=true
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl restart kubelet.service
Impact:
None
Default Value:
References:
1. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/45059
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-tls-bootstrapping/#kubelet-
configuration
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
216 | P a g e
4.2.13 Ensure that the Kubelet only makes use of Strong Cryptographic
Ciphers (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Ensure that the Kubelet is configured to only use strong cryptographic ciphers.
Rationale:
TLS ciphers have had a number of known vulnerabilities and weaknesses, which can
reduce the protection provided by them. By default, Kubernetes supports a number of TLS
ciphersuites including some that have security concerns, weakening the protection
provided.
Audit:
Remediation:
Impact:
Kubelet clients that cannot support modern cryptographic ciphers will not be able to make
connections to the Kubelet API.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/cis-benchmarks
Notes:
The list chosen above should be fine for modern clients. It's essentially the list from the
Mozilla "Modern cipher" option with the ciphersuites supporting CBC mode removed, as
CBC has traditionally had a lot of issues
217 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
218 | P a g e
5 Policies
This section contains recommendations for various Kubernetes policies which are
important to the security of the environment.
219 | P a g e
5.1 RBAC and Service Accounts
5.1.1 Ensure that the cluster-admin role is only used where required
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
The RBAC role cluster-admin provides wide-ranging powers over the environment and
should be used only where and when needed.
Rationale:
Kubernetes provides a set of default roles where RBAC is used. Some of these roles such as
cluster-admin provide wide-ranging privileges which should only be applied where
absolutely necessary. Roles such as cluster-admin allow super-user access to perform any
action on any resource. When used in a ClusterRoleBinding, it gives full control over
every resource in the cluster and in all namespaces. When used in a RoleBinding, it gives
full control over every resource in the rolebinding's namespace, including the namespace
itself.
Audit:
Obtain a list of the principals who have access to the cluster-admin role by reviewing the
clusterrolebinding output for each role binding that has access to the cluster-admin
role.
Review each principal listed and ensure that cluster-admin privilege is required for it.
Remediation:
Identify all clusterrolebindings to the cluster-admin role. Check if they are used and if they
need this role or if they could use a role with fewer privileges.
Where possible, first bind users to a lower privileged role and then remove the
clusterrolebinding to the cluster-admin role :
220 | P a g e
Impact:
Care should be taken before removing any clusterrolebindings from the environment to
ensure they were not required for operation of the cluster. Specifically, modifications
should not be made to clusterrolebindings with the system: prefix as they are required
for the operation of system components.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/rbac/#user-facing-roles
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
221 | P a g e
5.1.2 Minimize access to secrets (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
The Kubernetes API stores secrets, which may be service account tokens for the
Kubernetes API or credentials used by workloads in the cluster. Access to these secrets
should be restricted to the smallest possible group of users to reduce the risk of privilege
escalation.
Rationale:
Inappropriate access to secrets stored within the Kubernetes cluster can allow for an
attacker to gain additional access to the Kubernetes cluster or external resources whose
credentials are stored as secrets.
Audit:
Review the users who have get, list or watch access to secrets objects in the Kubernetes
API.
Remediation:
Where possible, remove get, list and watch access to secret objects in the cluster.
Impact:
Care should be taken not to remove access to secrets to system components which require
this for their operation
Default Value:
By default, in a kubeadm cluster the following list of principals have get privileges on
secret objects
CLUSTERROLEBINDING SUBJECT
TYPE SA-NAMESPACE
cluster-admin system:masters
Group
system:controller:clusterrole-aggregation-controller clusterrole-
aggregation-controller ServiceAccount kube-system
222 | P a g e
system:controller:expand-controller expand-controller
ServiceAccount kube-system
system:controller:generic-garbage-collector generic-garbage-
collector ServiceAccount kube-system
system:controller:namespace-controller namespace-controller
ServiceAccount kube-system
system:controller:persistent-volume-binder persistent-volume-
binder ServiceAccount kube-system
system:kube-controller-manager system:kube-controller-
manager User
CIS Controls:
Version 7
223 | P a g e
5.1.3 Minimize wildcard use in Roles and ClusterRoles (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Kubernetes Roles and ClusterRoles provide access to resources based on sets of objects and
actions that can be taken on those objects. It is possible to set either of these to be the
wildcard "*" which matches all items.
Use of wildcards is not optimal from a security perspective as it may allow for inadvertent
access to be granted when new resources are added to the Kubernetes API either as CRDs
or in later versions of the product.
Rationale:
The principle of least privilege recommends that users are provided only the access
required for their role and nothing more. The use of wildcard rights grants is likely to
provide excessive rights to the Kubernetes API.
Audit:
Retrieve the roles defined across each namespaces in the cluster and review for wildcards
Retrieve the cluster roles defined in the cluster and review for wildcards
Remediation:
Where possible replace any use of wildcards in clusterroles and roles with specific objects
or actions.
CIS Controls:
Version 7
224 | P a g e
5.1.4 Minimize access to create pods (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
The ability to create pods in a namespace can provide a number of opportunities for
privilege escalation, such as assigning privileged service accounts to these pods or
mounting hostPaths with access to sensitive data (unless Pod Security Policies are
implemented to restrict this access)
As such, access to create new pods should be restricted to the smallest possible group of
users.
Rationale:
The ability to create pods in a cluster opens up possibilities for privilege escalation and
should be restricted, where possible.
Audit:
Review the users who have create access to pod objects in the Kubernetes API.
Remediation:
Impact:
Care should be taken not to remove access to pods to system components which require
this for their operation
Default Value:
By default, in a kubeadm cluster the following list of principals have create privileges on
pod objects
CLUSTERROLEBINDING SUBJECT
TYPE SA-NAMESPACE
cluster-admin system:masters
Group
225 | P a g e
system:controller:clusterrole-aggregation-controller clusterrole-
aggregation-controller ServiceAccount kube-system
system:controller:daemon-set-controller daemon-set-controller
ServiceAccount kube-system
system:controller:job-controller job-controller
ServiceAccount kube-system
system:controller:persistent-volume-binder persistent-volume-
binder ServiceAccount kube-system
system:controller:replicaset-controller replicaset-controller
ServiceAccount kube-system
system:controller:replication-controller replication-controller
ServiceAccount kube-system
system:controller:statefulset-controller statefulset-controller
ServiceAccount kube-system
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
226 | P a g e
5.1.5 Ensure that default service accounts are not actively used. (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
The default service account should not be used to ensure that rights granted to
applications can be more easily audited and reviewed.
Rationale:
Kubernetes provides a default service account which is used by cluster workloads where
no specific service account is assigned to the pod.
Where access to the Kubernetes API from a pod is required, a specific service account
should be created for that pod, and rights granted to that service account.
The default service account should be configured such that it does not provide a service
account token and does not have any explicit rights assignments.
Audit:
For each namespace in the cluster, review the rights assigned to the default service account
and ensure that it has no roles or cluster roles bound to it apart from the defaults.
Additionally ensure that the automountServiceAccountToken: false setting is in place for
each default service account.
Remediation:
Create explicit service accounts wherever a Kubernetes workload requires specific access
to the Kubernetes API server.
Modify the configuration of each default service account to include this value
automountServiceAccountToken: false
Impact:
All workloads which require access to the Kubernetes API will require an explicit service
account to be created.
Default Value:
227 | P a g e
By default, the default service account allows for its service account token to be mounted
in pods in its namespace.
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-service-
account/
CIS Controls:
Version 7
228 | P a g e
5.1.6 Ensure that Service Account Tokens are only mounted where
necessary (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Service accounts tokens should not be mounted in pods except where the workload
running in the pod explicitly needs to communicate with the API server
Rationale:
Mounting service account tokens inside pods can provide an avenue for privilege escalation
attacks where an attacker is able to compromise a single pod in the cluster.
Audit:
Review pod and service account objects in the cluster and ensure that the option below is
set, unless the resource explicitly requires this access.
automountServiceAccountToken: false
Remediation:
Modify the definition of pods and service accounts which do not need to mount service
account tokens to disable it.
Impact:
Pods mounted without service account tokens will not be able to communicate with the API
server, except where the resource is available to unauthenticated principals.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-service-
account/
229 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
230 | P a g e
5.2 Pod Security Policies
A Pod Security Policy (PSP) is a cluster-level resource that controls security settings for
pods. Your cluster may have multiple PSPs. You can query PSPs with the following
command:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Privileged containers have access to all Linux Kernel capabilities and devices. A container
running with full privileges can do almost everything that the host can do. This flag exists
to allow special use-cases, like manipulating the network stack and accessing devices.
There should be at least one PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) defined which does not permit
privileged containers.
If you need to run privileged containers, this should be defined in a separate PSP and you
should carefully check RBAC controls to ensure that only limited service accounts and
users are given permission to access that PSP.
Audit:
231 | P a g e
Verify that there is at least one PSP which does not return true.
Remediation:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy/#enabling-pod-
security-policies
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
232 | P a g e
5.2.2 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host
process ID namespace (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Do not generally permit containers to be run with the hostPID flag set to true.
Rationale:
A container running in the host's PID namespace can inspect processes running outside the
container. If the container also has access to ptrace capabilities this can be used to escalate
privileges outside of the container.
There should be at least one PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) defined which does not permit
containers to share the host PID namespace.
If you need to run containers which require hostPID, this should be defined in a separate
PSP and you should carefully check RBAC controls to ensure that only limited service
accounts and users are given permission to access that PSP.
Audit:
Verify that there is at least one PSP which does not return true.
Remediation:
Impact:
Pods defined with spec.hostPID: true will not be permitted unless they are run under a
specific PSP.
233 | P a g e
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
234 | P a g e
5.2.3 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host
IPC namespace (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Do not generally permit containers to be run with the hostIPC flag set to true.
Rationale:
A container running in the host's IPC namespace can use IPC to interact with processes
outside the container.
There should be at least one PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) defined which does not permit
containers to share the host IPC namespace.
If you have a requirement to containers which require hostIPC, this should be defined in a
separate PSP and you should carefully check RBAC controls to ensure that only limited
service accounts and users are given permission to access that PSP.
Audit:
Verify that there is at least one PSP which does not return true.
Remediation:
Impact:
Pods defined with spec.hostIPC: true will not be permitted unless they are run under a
specific PSP.
235 | P a g e
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
236 | P a g e
5.2.4 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the host
network namespace (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Do not generally permit containers to be run with the hostNetwork flag set to true.
Rationale:
A container running in the host's network namespace could access the local loopback
device, and could access network traffic to and from other pods.
There should be at least one PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) defined which does not permit
containers to share the host network namespace.
If you have need to run containers which require hostNetwork, this should be defined in a
separate PSP and you should carefully check RBAC controls to ensure that only limited
service accounts and users are given permission to access that PSP.
Audit:
Verify that there is at least one PSP which does not return true.
Remediation:
Impact:
Pods defined with spec.hostNetwork: true will not be permitted unless they are run
under a specific PSP.
237 | P a g e
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
238 | P a g e
5.2.5 Minimize the admission of containers with
allowPrivilegeEscalation (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Do not generally permit containers to be run with the allowPrivilegeEscalation flag set
to true.
Rationale:
A container running with the allowPrivilegeEscalation flag set to true may have
processes that can gain more privileges than their parent.
There should be at least one PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) defined which does not permit
containers to allow privilege escalation. The option exists (and is defaulted to true) to
permit setuid binaries to run.
If you have need to run containers which use setuid binaries or require privilege escalation,
this should be defined in a separate PSP and you should carefully check RBAC controls to
ensure that only limited service accounts and users are given permission to access that
PSP.
Audit:
Verify that there is at least one PSP which does not return true.
Remediation:
Impact:
239 | P a g e
Pods defined with spec.allowPrivilegeEscalation: true will not be permitted unless
they are run under a specific PSP.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
240 | P a g e
5.2.6 Minimize the admission of root containers (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
Containers may run as any Linux user. Containers which run as the root user, whilst
constrained by Container Runtime security features still have an escalated likelihood of
container breakout.
There should be at least one PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) defined which does not permit root
users in a container.
If you need to run root containers, this should be defined in a separate PSP and you should
carefully check RBAC controls to ensure that only limited service accounts and users are
given permission to access that PSP.
Audit:
Verify that there is at least one PSP which returns MustRunAsNonRoot or MustRunAs with the
range of UIDs not including 0.
Remediation:
Impact:
241 | P a g e
Pods with containers which run as the root user will not be permitted.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy/#enabling-pod-
security-policies
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
242 | P a g e
5.2.7 Minimize the admission of containers with the NET_RAW
capability (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Do not generally permit containers with the potentially dangerous NET_RAW capability.
Rationale:
Containers run with a default set of capabilities as assigned by the Container Runtime. By
default, this can include potentially dangerous capabilities. With Docker as the container
runtime the NET_RAW capability is enabled which may be misused by malicious
containers.
There should be at least one PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) defined which prevents containers
with the NET_RAW capability from launching.
If you need to run containers with this capability, this should be defined in a separate PSP
and you should carefully check RBAC controls to ensure that only limited service accounts
and users are given permission to access that PSP.
Audit:
Verify that there is at least one PSP which returns NET_RAW or ALL.
Remediation:
Impact:
243 | P a g e
Pods with containers which run with the NET_RAW capability will not be permitted.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy/#enabling-pod-
security-policies
2. https://www.nccgroup.trust/uk/our-research/abusing-privileged-and-
unprivileged-linux-containers/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
244 | P a g e
5.2.8 Minimize the admission of containers with added capabilities
(Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Do not generally permit containers with capabilities assigned beyond the default set.
Rationale:
Containers run with a default set of capabilities as assigned by the Container Runtime.
Capabilities outside this set can be added to containers which could expose them to risks of
container breakout attacks.
There should be at least one PodSecurityPolicy (PSP) defined which prevents containers
with capabilities beyond the default set from launching.
If you need to run containers with additional capabilities, this should be defined in a
separate PSP and you should carefully check RBAC controls to ensure that only limited
service accounts and users are given permission to access that PSP.
Audit:
Verify that there are no PSPs present which have allowedCapabilities set to anything
other than an empty array.
Remediation:
Ensure that allowedCapabilities is not present in PSPs for the cluster unless it is set to an
empty array.
Impact:
Pods with containers which require capabilities out with the default set will not be
permitted.
Default Value:
245 | P a g e
By default, PodSecurityPolicies are not defined.
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy/#enabling-pod-
security-policies
2. https://www.nccgroup.trust/uk/our-research/abusing-privileged-and-
unprivileged-linux-containers/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
246 | P a g e
5.2.9 Minimize the admission of containers with capabilities assigned
(Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
Containers run with a default set of capabilities as assigned by the Container Runtime.
Capabilities are parts of the rights generally granted on a Linux system to the root user.
In many cases applications running in containers do not require any capabilities to operate,
so from the perspective of the principal of least privilege use of capabilities should be
minimized.
Audit:
Remediation:
Review the use of capabilities in applications running on your cluster. Where a namespace
contains applications which do not require any Linux capabilities to operate consider
adding a PSP which forbids the admission of containers which do not drop all capabilities.
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
247 | P a g e
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy/#enabling-pod-
security-policies
2. https://www.nccgroup.trust/uk/our-research/abusing-privileged-and-
unprivileged-linux-containers/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
248 | P a g e
5.3 Network Policies and CNI
5.3.1 Ensure that the CNI in use supports Network Policies (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
There are a variety of CNI plugins available for Kubernetes. If the CNI in use does not
support Network Policies it may not be possible to effectively restrict traffic in the cluster.
Rationale:
Kubernetes network policies are enforced by the CNI plugin in use. As such it is important
to ensure that the CNI plugin supports both Ingress and Egress network policies.
Audit:
Review the documentation of CNI plugin in use by the cluster, and confirm that it supports
Ingress and Egress network policies.
Remediation:
To use a CNI plugin with Network Policy, enable Network Policy in GKE, and the CNI plugin
will be updated. See Recommendation 6.6.7.
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/extend-kubernetes/compute-storage-
net/network-plugins/
Notes:
249 | P a g e
One example here is Flannel (https://github.com/coreos/flannel) which does not support
Network policy unless Calico is also in use.
CIS Controls:
Version 7
250 | P a g e
5.3.2 Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
Running different applications on the same Kubernetes cluster creates a risk of one
compromised application attacking a neighboring application. Network segmentation is
important to ensure that containers can communicate only with those they are supposed
to. A network policy is a specification of how selections of pods are allowed to
communicate with each other and other network endpoints.
Network Policies are namespace scoped. When a network policy is introduced to a given
namespace, all traffic not allowed by the policy is denied. However, if there are no network
policies in a namespace all traffic will be allowed into and out of the pods in that
namespace.
Audit:
Run the below command and review the NetworkPolicy objects created in the cluster.
Ensure that each namespace defined in the cluster has at least one Network Policy.
Remediation:
Follow the documentation and create NetworkPolicy objects as you need them.
Impact:
Once network policies are in use within a given namespace, traffic not explicitly allowed by
a network policy will be denied. As such it is important to ensure that, when introducing
network policies, legitimate traffic is not blocked.
Default Value:
251 | P a g e
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/networkpolicies/
2. https://octetz.com/posts/k8s-network-policy-apis
3. https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/declare-network-
policy/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
252 | P a g e
5.4 Secrets Management
5.4.1 Prefer using secrets as files over secrets as environment variables
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
It is reasonably common for application code to log out its environment (particularly in the
event of an error). This will include any secret values passed in as environment variables,
so secrets can easily be exposed to any user or entity who has access to the logs.
Audit:
Run the following command to find references to objects which use environment variables
defined from secrets.
Remediation:
If possible, rewrite application code to read secrets from mounted secret files, rather than
from environment variables.
Impact:
Application code which expects to read secrets in the form of environment variables would
need modification
Default Value:
253 | P a g e
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/secret/#using-secrets
Notes:
Mounting secrets as volumes has the additional benefit that secret values can be updated
without restarting the pod
CIS Controls:
Version 7
254 | P a g e
5.4.2 Consider external secret storage (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Consider the use of an external secrets storage and management system, instead of using
Kubernetes Secrets directly, if you have more complex secret management needs. Ensure
the solution requires authentication to access secrets, has auditing of access to and use of
secrets, and encrypts secrets. Some solutions also make it easier to rotate secrets.
Rationale:
Kubernetes supports secrets as first-class objects, but care needs to be taken to ensure that
access to secrets is carefully limited. Using an external secrets provider can ease the
management of access to secrets, especially where secrets are used across both Kubernetes
and non-Kubernetes environments.
Audit:
Remediation:
Refer to the secrets management options offered by your cloud provider or a third-party
secrets management solution.
Impact:
None
Default Value:
CIS Controls:
Version 7
255 | P a g e
5.5 Extensible Admission Control
5.5.1 Configure Image Provenance using ImagePolicyWebhook
admission controller (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
Kubernetes supports plugging in provenance rules to accept or reject the images in your
deployments. You could configure such rules to ensure that only approved images are
deployed in the cluster.
Audit:
Review the pod definitions in your cluster and verify that image provenance is configured
as appropriate.
See also Recommendation 6.10.5 for GKE specifically.
Remediation:
Impact:
You need to regularly maintain your provenance configuration based on container image
updates.
Default Value:
256 | P a g e
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/admission-controllers/#imagepolicywebhook
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-
proposals/image-provenance.md
3. https://hub.docker.com/r/dnurmi/anchore-toolbox/
4. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/22888
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
257 | P a g e
5.6 General Policies
These policies relate to general cluster management topics, like namespace best practices
and policies applied to pod objects in the cluster.
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Limiting the scope of user permissions can reduce the impact of mistakes or malicious
activities. A Kubernetes namespace allows you to partition created resources into logically
named groups. Resources created in one namespace can be hidden from other namespaces.
By default, each resource created by a user in Kubernetes cluster runs in a default
namespace, called default. You can create additional namespaces and attach resources and
users to them. You can use Kubernetes Authorization plugins to create policies that
segregate access to namespace resources between different users.
Audit:
Run the below command and review the namespaces created in the cluster.
Ensure that these namespaces are the ones you need and are adequately administered as
per your requirements.
Remediation:
Follow the documentation and create namespaces for objects in your deployment as you
need them.
Impact:
258 | P a g e
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-
objects/namespaces/
2. http://blog.kubernetes.io/2016/08/security-best-practices-kubernetes-
deployment.html
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
259 | P a g e
5.6.2 Ensure that the seccomp profile is set to docker/default in your
pod definitions (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
Seccomp (secure computing mode) is used to restrict the set of system calls applications
can make, allowing cluster administrators greater control over the security of workloads
running in the cluster. Kubernetes disables seccomp profiles by default for historical
reasons. You should enable it to ensure that the workloads have restricted actions available
within the container.
Audit:
Review the pod definitions in your cluster. It should create a line as below:
annotations:
seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/pod: docker/default
Remediation:
Seccomp is an alpha feature currently. By default, all alpha features are disabled. So, you
would need to enable alpha features in the apiserver by passing "--feature-
gates=AllAlpha=true" argument.
Edit the /etc/kubernetes/apiserver file on the master node and set the KUBE_API_ARGS
parameter to "--feature-gates=AllAlpha=true"
KUBE_API_ARGS="--feature-gates=AllAlpha=true"
Use annotations to enable the docker/default seccomp profile in your pod definitions. An
example is as below:
260 | P a g e
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: trustworthy-pod
annotations:
seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/pod: docker/default
spec:
containers:
- name: trustworthy-container
image: sotrustworthy:latest
Impact:
If the docker/default seccomp profile is too restrictive for you, you would have to
create/manage your own seccomp profiles. Also, you need to enable all alpha features for
this to work. There is no individual switch to turn on this feature.
Default Value:
By default, seccomp profile is set to unconfined which means that no seccomp profiles are
enabled.
References:
1. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/39845
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/21790
3. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-
proposals/seccomp.md#examples
4. https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/seccomp/
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
261 | P a g e
5.6.3 Apply Security Context to Your Pods and Containers (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
A security context defines the operating system security settings (uid, gid, capabilities,
SELinux role, etc..) applied to a container. When designing your containers and pods, make
sure that you configure the security context for your pods, containers, and volumes. A
security context is a property defined in the deployment yaml. It controls the security
parameters that will be assigned to the pod/container/volume. There are two levels of
security context: pod level security context, and container level security context.
Audit:
Review the pod definitions in your cluster and verify that you have security contexts
defined as appropriate.
Remediation:
Follow the Kubernetes documentation and apply security contexts to your pods. For a
suggested list of security contexts, you may refer to the CIS Security Benchmark for Docker
Containers.
Impact:
If you incorrectly apply security contexts, you may have trouble running the pods.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/security-context/
2. https://learn.cisecurity.org/benchmarks
262 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 6
Version 7
263 | P a g e
5.6.4 The default namespace should not be used (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
The only entries there should be system managed resources such as the kubernetes service
Remediation:
Ensure that namespaces are created to allow for appropriate segregation of Kubernetes
resources and that all new resources are created in a specific namespace.
Impact:
None
Default Value:
Unless a namespace is specific on object creation, the default namespace will be used
CIS Controls:
Version 7
264 | P a g e
6 Managed services
This section consists of security recommendations for the direct configuration of
Kubernetes managed service components, namely, Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). These
recommendations are directly applicable for features which exist only as part of a managed
service.
265 | P a g e
6.1 Image Registry and Image Scanning
This section contains recommendations relating to container image registries and securing
images in those registries, such as Google Container Registry (GCR).
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
Audit:
Ensure that the Container Scanning API is listed within the output.
Remediation:
266 | P a g e
1.1.1.20 Using Command Line:
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/container-registry/docs/container-analysis
CIS Controls:
Version 7
267 | P a g e
6.1.2 Minimize user access to GCR (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Restrict user access to GCR, limiting interaction with build images to only authorized
personnel and service accounts.
Rationale:
Weak access control to GCR may allow malicious users to replace built images with
vulnerable or backdoored containers.
Audit:
Users may have permissions to use Service Accounts and thus Users could inherit
privileges on the GCR Bucket. To check the accounts that could do this:
Note that other privileged project level roles will have the ability to write and modify
objects and the GCR bucket. Consult the GCP CIS benchmark and IAM documentation for
further reference.
268 | P a g e
gsutil iam get gs://artifacts.[PROJECT_ID].appspot.com
The output of the command will return roles associated with the GCR bucket and which
members have those roles.
Additionally, run the following to identify users and service accounts that hold privileged
roles at the project level, and thus inherit these privileges within the GCR bucket:
The output from the command lists the service accounts that have create/modify
permissions.
Users may have permissions to use Service Accounts and thus Users could inherit
privileges on the GCR Bucket. To check the accounts that could do this:
Note that other privileged project level roles will have the ability to write and modify
objects and the GCR bucket. Consult the GCP CIS benchmark and IAM documentation for
further reference.
Remediation:
269 | P a g e
For a User or Service account with Project level permissions inherited by the GCR bucket,
or the Service Account User Role:
Then remove the excessively privileged role (Storage Admin / Storage Object Admin /
Storage Object Creator) using:
where:
To modify roles defined at the project level and subsequently inherited within the GCR
bucket, or the Service Account User role, extract the IAM policy file, modify it accordingly
and apply it using:
Impact:
Care should be taken not to remove access to GCR for accounts that require this for their
operation. Any account granted the Storage Object Viewer role at the project level can view
all objects stored in GCS for the project.
270 | P a g e
Default Value:
By default, GCR is disabled and access controls are set during initialization.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/container-registry/docs/access-control
CIS Controls:
Version 7
271 | P a g e
6.1.3 Minimize cluster access to read-only for GCR (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Configure the Cluster Service Account with Storage Object Viewer Role to only allow read-
only access to GCR.
Rationale:
The Cluster Service Account does not require administrative access to GCR, only requiring
pull access to containers to deploy onto GKE. Restricting permissions follows the principles
of least privilege and prevents credentials from being abused beyond the required role.
Audit:
The output of the command will return roles associated with the GCR bucket. If listed,
ensure the GKE Service account is set to "role": "roles/storage.objectViewer".
If the GKE Service Account has project level permissions that are inherited within the
bucket, ensure that these are not privileged:
272 | P a g e
bindings.role:roles/storage.legacyBucketWriter OR
bindings.role:roles/storage.legacyObjectOwner"
Your GKE Service Account should not be output when this command is run.
Remediation:
For an account that inherits access to the bucket through Project level permissions:
where:
273 | P a g e
Then remove the excessively privileged role (Storage Admin / Storage Object Admin /
Storage Object Creator) using:
For an account that inherits access to the GCR Bucket through Project level permissions,
modify the Projects IAM policy file accordingly, then upload it using:
Impact:
A separate dedicated service account may be required for use by build servers and other
robot users pushing or managing container images.
Any account granted the Storage Object Viewer role at the project level can view all objects
stored in GCS for the project.
Default Value:
The default permissions for the cluster Service account is dependent on the initial
configuration and IAM policy.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/container-registry/docs/access-control
CIS Controls:
Version 7
274 | P a g e
6.1.4 Minimize Container Registries to only those approved (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
Allowing unrestricted access to external container registries provides the opportunity for
malicious or unapproved containers to be deployed into the cluster. Allowlisting only
approved container registries reduces this risk.
Audit:
275 | P a g e
{
"enabled": true
}
Ensure that the current policy is not configured to allow all images (evaluationMode:
ALWAYS_ALLOW).
Review the list of admissionWhitelistPatterns for unauthorized container registries.
cat current-policy.yaml
admissionWhitelistPatterns:
...
defaultAdmissionRule:
evaluationMode: ALWAYS_ALLOW
Remediation:
Create a Binary Authorization Policy using the Binary Authorization Policy Reference
(https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/policy-yaml-reference) for
276 | P a g e
guidance.
Import the policy file into Binary Authorization:
Impact:
All container images to be deployed to the cluster must be hosted within an approved
container image registry. If public registries are not on the allowlist, a process for bringing
commonly used container images into an approved private registry and keeping them up to
date will be required.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/policy-yaml-reference
CIS Controls:
Version 7
277 | P a g e
6.2 Identity and Access Management (IAM)
This section contains recommendations relating to using Cloud IAM with GKE.
6.2.1 Ensure GKE clusters are not running using the Compute Engine
default service account (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Create and use minimally privileged Service accounts to run GKE cluster nodes instead of
using the Compute Engine default Service account. Unnecessary permissions could be
abused in the case of a node compromise.
Rationale:
A GCP service account (as distinct from a Kubernetes ServiceAccount) is an identity that an
instance or an application can use to run GCP API requests on your behalf. This identity is
used to identify virtual machine instances to other Google Cloud Platform services. By
default, Kubernetes Engine nodes use the Compute Engine default service account. This
account has broad access by default, as defined by access scopes, making it useful to a wide
variety of applications on the VM, but it has more permissions than are required to run
your Kubernetes Engine cluster.
You should create and use a minimally privileged service account to run your Kubernetes
Engine cluster instead of using the Compute Engine default service account, and create
separate service accounts for each Kubernetes Workload (See Recommendation 6.2.2).
Kubernetes Engine requires, at a minimum, the node service account to have the
monitoring.viewer, monitoring.metricWriter, and logging.logWriter roles. Additional roles
may need to be added for the nodes to pull images from GCR.
Audit:
278 | P a g e
2. Select the cluster under test and click on each Node pool to bring up the Node pool
details page. Ensure that for each Node pool the Service account is not set to default
under the Security heading.
To check the permissions allocated to the service account are the minimum required for
cluster operation:
• Logs Writer
• Monitoring Metric Writer
• Monitoring Viewer
The output of the above command will return default if default Service account is used for
Project access.
To check that the permissions allocated to the service account are the minimum required
for cluster operation:
Review the output to ensure that the service account only has the roles required to run the
cluster:
• roles/logging.logWriter
• roles/monitoring.metricWriter
• roles/monitoring.viewer
Remediation:
279 | P a g e
1. Go to Service Accounts by visiting https://console.cloud.google.com/iam-
admin/serviceaccounts
2. Click on CREATE SERVICE ACCOUNT
3. Enter Service Account Details
4. Click CREATE
5. Within Service Account permissions add the following roles:
• Logs Writer
• Monitoring Metric Writer
• Monitoring Viewer
6. Click CONTINUE
7. Grant users access to this service account and create keys as required
8. Click DONE.
You will need to migrate your workloads to the new Node pool, and delete Node pools that
use the default service account to complete the remediation.
280 | P a g e
Grant the following roles to the service account:
To create a new Node pool using the Service account, run the following command:
You will need to migrate your workloads to the new Node pool, and delete Node pools that
use the default service account to complete the remediation.
Impact:
The Service account roles listed here are the minimum required to run the cluster.
Additional roles may be required to pull from a private instance of Google Container
Registry (GCR).
Default Value:
By default, nodes use the Compute Engine default service account when you create a new
cluster.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/access/service-
accounts#compute_engine_default_service_account
281 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
282 | P a g e
6.2.2 Prefer using dedicated GCP Service Accounts and Workload
Identity (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Kubernetes workloads should not use cluster node service accounts to authenticate to
Google Cloud APIs. Each Kubernetes Workload that needs to authenticate to other Google
services using Cloud IAM should be provisioned a dedicated Service account. Enabling
Workload Identity manages the distribution and rotation of Service account keys for the
workloads to use.
Rationale:
Once a relationship between a Kubernetes Service account and a GCP Service account has
been configured, any workload running as the Kubernetes Service account automatically
authenticates as the mapped GCP Service account when accessing Google Cloud APIs on a
cluster with Workload Identity enabled.
Audit:
283 | P a g e
1.1.1.38 Using Command Line:
If Workload Identity is enabled, the following fields should be present, and the
[PROJECT_ID] should be set to the namespace of the GCP project containing the cluster:
workloadIdentityConfig:
identityNamespace:[PROJECT_ID].svc.id.goog
workloadMetadataConfig:
nodeMetadata: GKE_METADATA_SERVER
You will also need to manually audit each Kubernetes workload requiring Google Cloud API
access to ensure that Workload Identity is being used and not some other method.
Remediation:
Note that existing Node pools are unaffected. New Node pools default to --workload-
metadata-from-node=GKE_METADATA_SERVER.
Then, modify existing Node pools to enable GKE_METADATA_SERVER:
284 | P a g e
gcloud beta container node-pools update [NODEPOOL_NAME] \
--cluster=[CLUSTER_NAME] --zone [CLUSTER_ZONE] \
--workload-metadata-from-node=GKE_METADATA_SERVER
You may also need to modify workloads in order for them to use Workload Identity as
described within https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/workload-
identity. Also consider the effects on the availability of your hosted workloads as Node
pools are updated, it may be more appropriate to create new Node Pools.
Impact:
During the Workload Identity beta, a GCP project can have a maximum of 20 clusters with
Workload Identity enabled.
Workload Identity replaces the need to use Metadata Concealment and as such, the two
approaches are incompatible. The sensitive metadata protected by Metadata Concealment
is also protected by Workload Identity.
When Workload Identity is enabled, you can no longer use the Compute Engine default
Service account. Correspondingly, Workload Identity can't be used with Pods running in
the host network. You may also need to modify workloads in order for them to use
Workload Identity as described within https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-
engine/docs/how-to/workload-identity
GKE infrastructure pods such as Stackdriver will continue to use the Node's Service
account.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/workload-identity
CIS Controls:
Version 7
285 | P a g e
6.3 Cloud Key Management Service (Cloud KMS)
This section contains recommendations relating to using Cloud KMS with GKE.
• Level 1
Description:
Rationale:
By default, GKE encrypts customer content stored at rest, including Secrets. GKE handles
and manages this default encryption for you without any additional action on your part.
Using this functionality, you can use a key, that you manage in Cloud KMS, to encrypt data
at the application layer. This protects against attackers in the event that they manage to
gain access to etcd.
Audit:
286 | P a g e
If configured correctly, the output from the command returns a response containing the
following detail:
keyName=projects/[PROJECT_ID]/locations/[LOCATION]/keyRings/[RING_NAME]/crypt
oKeys/[KEY_NAME]
state=ENCRYPTED
Remediation:
• A key ring
• A key
• A GKE service account with Cloud KMS CryptoKey Encrypter/Decrypter role
Once these are created, Application-layer Secrets Encryption can be enabled on an existing
or new cluster.
287 | P a g e
1.1.1.43.3 To enable on an existing cluster
Create a key:
Grant the Kubernetes Engine Service Agent service account the Cloud KMS CryptoKey
Encrypter/Decrypter role:
288 | P a g e
1.1.1.44.3 To enable on an existing cluster
Impact:
To use the Cloud KMS CryptoKey to protect etcd in the cluster, the 'Kubernetes Engine
Service Agent' Service account must hold the 'Cloud KMS CryptoKey Encrypter/Decrypter'
role.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/encrypting-secrets
CIS Controls:
Version 7
289 | P a g e
6.4 Node Metadata
This section contains recommendations relating to node metadata in GKE.
• Level 1
Description:
Disable the legacy GCE instance metadata APIs for GKE nodes. Under some circumstances,
these can be used from within a pod to extract the node's credentials.
Rationale:
The legacy GCE metadata endpoint allows simple HTTP requests to be made returning
sensitive information. To prevent the enumeration of metadata endpoints and data
exfiltration, the legacy metadata endpoint must be disabled.
Without requiring a custom HTTP header when accessing the legacy GCE metadata
endpoint, a flaw in an application that allows an attacker to trick the code into retrieving
the contents of an attacker-specified web URL could provide a simple method for
enumeration and potential credential exfiltration. By requiring a custom HTTP header, the
attacker needs to exploit an application flaw that allows them to control the URL and also
add custom headers in order to carry out this attack successfully.
Audit:
290 | P a g e
gcloud container node-pools describe [NODE_POOL] \
--cluster [CLUSTER_NAME] --zone [COMPUTE_ZONE] \
--format json | jq '.config.metadata'
Alternatively, to audit all of the clusters Node pools simultaneously, run the following
command:
For each of the Node pools with the correct setting the output of the above command
returns:
"disable-legacy-endpoints"": ""true"
Remediation:
The legacy GCE metadata endpoint must be disabled upon the cluster or node-pool
creation. For GKE versions 1.12 and newer, the legacy GCE metadata endpoint is disabled
by default.
You will need to migrate workloads from any existing non-conforming Node pools, to the
new Node pool, then delete non-conforming Node pools to complete the remediation.
291 | P a g e
You will need to migrate workloads from any existing non-conforming Node pools, to the
new Node pool, then delete non-conforming Node pools to complete the remediation.
Impact:
Any workloads using the legacy GCE metadata endpoint will no longer be able to retrieve
metadata from the endpoint. Use Workload Identity instead.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/protecting-cluster-
metadata#disable-legacy-apis
CIS Controls:
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
292 | P a g e
6.4.2 Ensure the GKE Metadata Server is Enabled (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Running the GKE Metadata Server prevents workloads from accessing sensitive instance
metadata and facilitates Workload Identity
Rationale:
Every node stores its metadata on a metadata server. Some of this metadata, such as
kubelet credentials and the VM instance identity token, is sensitive and should not be
exposed to a Kubernetes workload. Enabling the GKE Metadata server prevents pods (that
are not running on the host network) from accessing this metadata and facilitates
Workload Identity.
When unspecified, the default setting allows running pods to have full access to the node's
underlying metadata server.
Audit:
293 | P a g e
{
"nodeMetadata": GKE_METADATA_SERVER
}
Remediation:
The GKE Metadata Server requires Workload Identity to be enabled on a cluster. Modify the
cluster to enable Workload Identity and enable the GKE Metadata Server.
Note that existing Node pools are unaffected. New Node pools default to --workload-
metadata-from-node=GKE_METADATA_SERVER.
To modify an existing Node pool to enable GKE Metadata Server:
You may also need to modify workloads in order for them to use Workload Identity as
described within https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/workload-
identity.
Impact:
294 | P a g e
The GKE Metadata Server must be run when using Workload Identity. Because Workload
Identity replaces the need to use Metadata Concealment, the two approaches are
incompatible.
When the GKE Metadata Server and Workload Identity are enabled, unless the Pod is
running on the host network, Pods cannot use the Compute Engine default service account.
You may also need to modify workloads in order for them to use Workload Identity as
described within https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/workload-
identity.
Default Value:
By default, running pods to have full access to the node's underlying metadata server.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/protecting-cluster-
metadata#concealment
CIS Controls:
Version 7
295 | P a g e
6.5 Node Configuration and Maintenance
This section contains recommendations relating to node configurations in GKE.
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
COS is an operating system image for Compute Engine VMs optimized for running
containers. With COS, you can bring up your containers on Google Cloud Platform quickly,
efficiently, and securely.
• Run containers out of the box: COS instances come pre-installed with the container
runtime and cloud-init. With a COS instance, you can bring up your container at
the same time you create your VM, with no on-host setup required.
• Smaller attack surface: COS has a smaller footprint, reducing your instance's
potential attack surface.
• Locked-down by default: COS instances include a locked-down firewall and other
security settings by default.
Audit:
296 | P a g e
1.1.1.54 Using Command line:
To check Node image type for an existing cluster's Node pool:
The output of the above command returns COS, if COS is used for Node images.
Remediation:
Impact:
If modifying an existing cluster's Node pool to run COS, the upgrade operation used is long-
running and will block other operations on the cluster (including delete) until it has run to
completion.
COS nodes also provide an option with containerd as the main container runtime directly
integrated with Kubernetes instead of docker. Thus, on these nodes, Docker cannot view, or
access containers or images managed by Kubernetes. Your applications should not interact
with Docker directly. For general troubleshooting or debugging, use crictl instead.
Default Value:
297 | P a g e
Container-Optimized OS (COS) is the default option for a cluster node image.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/node-images
2. https://cloud.google.com/container-optimized-os/docs/
3. https://cloud.google.com/container-optimized-os/docs/concepts/security
CIS Controls:
Version 7
298 | P a g e
6.5.2 Ensure Node Auto-Repair is enabled for GKE nodes (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Nodes in a degraded state are an unknown quantity and so may pose a security risk.
Rationale:
Kubernetes Engine's node auto-repair feature helps you keep the nodes in your cluster in a
healthy, running state. When enabled, Kubernetes Engine makes periodic checks on the
health state of each node in your cluster. If a node fails consecutive health checks over an
extended time period, Kubernetes Engine initiates a repair process for that node.
Audit:
Ensure the output of the above command has JSON key attribute autoRepair set to true:
{
"autoRepair": true
}
Remediation:
299 | P a g e
1.1.2.2 Using Google Cloud Console:
Impact:
If multiple nodes require repair, Kubernetes Engine might repair them in parallel.
Kubernetes Engine limits number of repairs depending on the size of the cluster (bigger
clusters have a higher limit) and the number of broken nodes in the cluster (limit decreases
if many nodes are broken).
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/node-auto-repair
CIS Controls:
Version 7
300 | P a g e
6.5.3 Ensure Node Auto-Upgrade is enabled for GKE nodes (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Node auto-upgrade keeps nodes at the current Kubernetes and OS security patch level to
mitigate known vulnerabilities.
Rationale:
Node auto-upgrade helps you keep the nodes in your cluster or Node pool up to date with
the latest stable patch version of Kubernetes as well as the underlying node operating
system. Node auto-upgrade uses the same update mechanism as manual node upgrades.
Node pools with node auto-upgrade enabled are automatically scheduled for upgrades
when a new stable Kubernetes version becomes available. When the upgrade is performed,
the Node pool is upgraded to match the current cluster master version. From a security
perspective, this has the benefit of applying security updates automatically to the
Kubernetes Engine when security fixes are released.
Audit:
Ensure the output of the above command has JSON key attribute autoUpgrade set to true:
301 | P a g e
{
"autoUpgrade": true
}
If node auto-upgrade is disabled, the output of the above command output will not contain
the autoUpgrade entry.
Remediation:
Impact:
Enabling node auto-upgrade does not cause your nodes to upgrade immediately. Automatic
upgrades occur at regular intervals at the discretion of the Kubernetes Engine team.
To prevent upgrades occurring during a peak period for your cluster, you should define a
maintenance window. A maintenance window is a four-hour timeframe that you choose in
which automatic upgrades should occur. Upgrades can occur on any day of the week, and at
any time within the timeframe. To prevent upgrades from occurring during certain dates,
you should define a maintenance exclusion. A maintenance exclusion can span multiple
days.
Default Value:
302 | P a g e
Even if a cluster has been created with node auto-upgrade enabled, this only applies to the
default Node pool. Subsequent node pools do not have node auto-upgrade enabled by
default.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/node-auto-upgrades
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/maintenance-windows-
and-exclusions
Notes:
CIS Controls:
Version 7
303 | P a g e
6.5.4 Automate GKE version management using Release Channels (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Subscribe to the Regular or Stable Release Channel to automate version upgrades to the
GKE cluster and to reduce version management complexity to the number of features and
level of stability required.
Rationale:
Release Channels signal a graduating level of stability and production-readiness. These are
based on observed performance of GKE clusters running that version and represent
experience and confidence in the cluster version.
The Regular release channel upgrades every few weeks and is for production users who
need features not yet offered in the Stable channel. These versions have passed internal
validation, but don't have enough historical data to guarantee their stability. Known issues
generally have known workarounds.
The Stable release channel upgrades every few months and is for production users who
need stability above all else, and for whom frequent upgrades are too risky. These versions
have passed internal validation and have been shown to be stable and reliable in
production, based on the observed performance of those clusters.
Audit:
304 | P a g e
1.1.2.9 Using Command Line:
Run the following command:
The output of the above command will return regular or stable if these release channels
are being used to manage automatic upgrades for your cluster.
Remediation:
Currently, cluster Release Channels are only configurable at cluster provisioning time.
Impact:
Once release channels are enabled on a cluster, they cannot be disabled. To stop using
release channels, you must recreate the cluster without the --release-channel flag.
Default Value:
305 | P a g e
Currently, release channels are not enabled by default.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/release-channels
CIS Controls:
Version 7
306 | P a g e
6.5.5 Ensure Shielded GKE Nodes are Enabled (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Shielded GKE Nodes provides verifiable integrity via secure boot, virtual trusted platform
module (vTPM)-enabled measured boot, and integrity monitoring.
Rationale:
Shielded GKE nodes protects clusters against boot- or kernel-level malware or rootkits
which persist beyond infected OS.
Shielded GKE nodes run firmware which is signed and verified using Google's Certificate
Authority, ensuring that the nodes' firmware is unmodified and establishing the root of
trust for Secure Boot. GKE node identity is strongly protected via virtual Trusted Platform
Module (vTPM) and verified remotely by the master node before the node joins the cluster.
Lastly, GKE node integrity (i.e., boot sequence and kernel) is measured and can be
monitored and verified remotely.
Audit:
This will return the following if Shielded GKE Nodes are enabled:
{
"enabled": true
}
307 | P a g e
Remediation:
Impact:
After you enable Shielded GKE Nodes in a cluster, any nodes created in a Node pool without
Shielded GKE Nodes enabled, or created outside of any Node pool, aren't able to join the
cluster.
Shielded GKE Nodes can only be used with Container-Optimized OS (COS), COS with
containerd, and Ubuntu node images.
Default Value:
If Shielded GKE Nodes are enabled, Integrity Monitoring (through Stackdriver) is enabled
by default and Secure Boot is disabled by default.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/shielded-gke-nodes
CIS Controls:
Version 7
308 | P a g e
5.3 Securely Store Master Images
Store the master images and templates on securely configured servers, validated with
integrity monitoring tools, to ensure that only authorized changes to the images are
possible.
309 | P a g e
6.5.6 Ensure Integrity Monitoring for Shielded GKE Nodes is Enabled
(Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Enable Integrity Monitoring for Shielded GKE Nodes to be notified of inconsistencies during
the node boot sequence.
Rationale:
Integrity Monitoring provides active alerting for Shielded GKE nodes which allows
administrators to respond to integrity failures and prevent compromised nodes from being
deployed into the cluster.
Audit:
{
"enableIntegrityMonitoring": true
}
310 | P a g e
Remediation:
Once a Node pool is provisioned, it cannot be updated to enable Integrity Monitoring. You
must create new Node pools within the cluster with Integrity Monitoring enabled
You will also need to migrate workloads from existing non-conforming Node pools to the
newly created Node pool, then the non-conforming pools.
You will also need to migrate workloads from existing non-conforming Node pools to the
newly created Node pool, then delete the non-conforming pools.
Impact:
None.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/shielded-gke-
nodes#system_integrity_monitoring
311 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
312 | P a g e
6.5.7 Ensure Secure Boot for Shielded GKE Nodes is Enabled (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Enable Secure Boot for Shielded GKE Nodes to verify the digital signature of node boot
components.
Rationale:
An attacker may seek to alter boot components to persist malware or root kits during
system initialization. Secure Boot helps ensure that the system only runs authentic
software by verifying the digital signature of all boot components, and halting the boot
process if signature verification fails.
Audit:
{
"enableSecureBoot": true
}
313 | P a g e
Remediation:
Once a Node pool is provisioned, it cannot be updated to enable Secure Boot. You must
create new Node pools within the cluster with Secure Boot enabled.
You will also need to migrate workloads from existing non-conforming Node pools to the
newly created Node pool, then delete the non-conforming pools.
You will also need to migrate workloads from existing non-conforming Node pools to the
newly created Node pool, then delete the non-conforming pools.
Impact:
Secure Boot will not permit the use of third-party unsigned kernel modules.
Default Value:
By default, Secure Boot is disabled in GKE clusters. By default, Secure Boot is disabled when
Shielded GKE Nodes is enabled.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/shielded-gke-
nodes#secure_boot
314 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
315 | P a g e
6.6 Cluster Networking
This section contains recommendations relating to network security configurations in GKE.
6.6.1 Enable VPC Flow Logs and Intranode Visibility (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Enable VPC Flow Logs and Intranode Visibility to see pod-level traffic, even for traffic
within a worker node.
Rationale:
Enabling Intranode Visibility makes your intranode pod to pod traffic visible to the
networking fabric. With this feature, you can use VPC Flow Logs or other VPC features for
intranode traffic.
Audit:
316 | P a g e
Remediation:
Impact:
This is a beta feature. Enabling it on existing cluster causes the cluster master and the
cluster nodes to restart, which might cause disruption.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/intranode-visibility
CIS Controls:
Version 7
317 | P a g e
6.6.2 Ensure use of VPC-native clusters (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Create Alias IPs for the node network CIDR range in order to subsequently configure IP-
based policies and firewalling for pods. A cluster that uses Alias IPs is called a 'VPC-native'
cluster.
Rationale:
• Pod IPs are reserved within the network ahead of time, which prevents conflict with
other compute resources.
• The networking layer can perform anti-spoofing checks to ensure that egress traffic
is not sent with arbitrary source IPs.
• Firewall controls for Pods can be applied separately from their nodes.
• Alias IPs allow Pods to directly access hosted services without using a NAT gateway.
Audit:
The output of the above command should return true, if VPC-native (using alias IP) is
enabled. If VPC-native (using alias IP) is disabled, the above command will return null ({
}).
318 | P a g e
Remediation:
Use of Alias IPs cannot be enabled on an existing cluster. To create a new cluster using Alias
IPs, follow the instructions below.
Impact:
You cannot currently migrate an existing cluster that uses routes for Pod routing to a
cluster that uses Alias IPs.
Cluster IPs for internal services remain only available from within the cluster. If you want
to access a Kubernetes Service from within the VPC, but from outside of the cluster, use an
internal load balancer.
Default Value:
By default, VPC-native (using alias IP) is enabled when you create a new cluster in the
Google Cloud Console, however this is disabled when creating a new cluster using the
gcloud CLI, unless the --enable-ip-alias argument is specified.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/alias-ips
2. https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/alias-ip
319 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
11 Secure Configuration for Network Devices, such as Firewalls, Routers and Switches
Secure Configuration for Network Devices, such as Firewalls, Routers and Switches
320 | P a g e
6.6.3 Ensure Master Authorized Networks is Enabled (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Enable Master Authorized Networks to restrict access to the cluster's control plane (master
endpoint) to only an allowlist (whitelist) of authorized IPs.
Rationale:
Authorized networks are a way of specifying a restricted range of IP addresses that are
permitted to access your cluster's control plane. Kubernetes Engine uses both Transport
Layer Security (TLS) and authentication to provide secure access to your cluster's control
plane from the public internet. This provides you the flexibility to administer your cluster
from anywhere; however, you might want to further restrict access to a set of IP addresses
that you control. You can set this restriction by specifying an authorized network.
Master Authorized Networks blocks untrusted IP addresses. Google Cloud Platform IPs
(such as traffic from Compute Engine VMs) can reach your master through HTTPS provided
that they have the necessary Kubernetes credentials.
Restricting access to an authorized network can provide additional security benefits for
your container cluster, including:
Audit:
321 | P a g e
2. From the list of clusters, click on the cluster to open the Details page and make sure
'Master authorized networks' is set to 'Enabled'.
{
"enabled": true
}
Remediation:
Along with this, you can list authorized networks using the --master-authorized-
networks flag which contains a list of up to 20 external networks that are allowed to
connect to your cluster's control plane through HTTPS. You provide these networks as a
comma-separated list of addresses in CIDR notation (such as 90.90.100.0/24).
322 | P a g e
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/authorized-networks
CIS Controls:
Version 7
323 | P a g e
6.6.4 Ensure clusters are created with Private Endpoint Enabled and
Public Access Disabled (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Disable access to the Kubernetes API from outside the node network if it is not required.
Rationale:
In a private cluster, the master node has two endpoints, a private and public endpoint. The
private endpoint is the internal IP address of the master, behind an internal load balancer
in the master's VPC network. Nodes communicate with the master using the private
endpoint. The public endpoint enables the Kubernetes API to be accessed from outside the
master's VPC network.
Audit:
The output of the above command returns true if a Private Endpoint is enabled with Public
Access disabled.
324 | P a g e
For an additional check, the endpoint parameter can be queried with the following
command:
The output of the above command returns a private IP address if Private Endpoint is
enabled with Public Access disabled.
Remediation:
Once a cluster is created without enabling Private Endpoint only, it cannot be remediated.
Rather, the cluster must be recreated.
Impact:
To enable a Private Endpoint, the cluster has to also be configured with private nodes, a
private master IP range and IP aliasing enabled.
If the Private Endpoint flag --enable-private-endpoint is passed to the gcloud CLI, or the
external IP address undefined in the Google Cloud Console during cluster creation, then all
access from a public IP address is prohibited.
325 | P a g e
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/private-clusters
CIS Controls:
Version 7
12 Boundary Defense
Boundary Defense
326 | P a g e
6.6.5 Ensure clusters are created with Private Nodes (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Disable public IP addresses for cluster nodes, so that they only have private IP addresses.
Private Nodes are nodes with no public IP addresses.
Rationale:
Disabling public IP addresses on cluster nodes restricts access to only internal networks,
forcing attackers to obtain local network access before attempting to compromise the
underlying Kubernetes hosts.
Audit:
The output of the above command returns true if Private Nodes is enabled.
Remediation:
Once a cluster is created without enabling Private Nodes, it cannot be remediated. Rather
the cluster must be recreated.
327 | P a g e
3. Configure the cluster as desired then click 'Availability, networking, security, and
additional features'
4. Under 'Network Security' ensure the 'Private cluster' checkbox is checked
5. Configure other settings as required
6. Click CREATE.
Setting this flag also requires the setting of --enable-ip-alias and --master-ipv4-
cidr=[MASTER_CIDR_RANGE].
Impact:
To enable Private Nodes, the cluster has to also be configured with a private master IP
range and IP Aliasing enabled.
Private Nodes do not have outbound access to the public internet. If you want to provide
outbound Internet access for your private nodes, you can use Cloud NAT or you can
manage your own NAT gateway.
To access Google Cloud APIs and services from private nodes, Private Google Access needs
to be set on Kubernetes Engine Cluster Subnets.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/private-clusters
CIS Controls:
Version 7
12 Boundary Defense
Boundary Defense
328 | P a g e
6.6.6 Consider firewalling GKE worker nodes (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Reduce the network attack surface of GKE nodes by using Firewalls to restrict ingress and
egress traffic.
Rationale:
Utilizing stringent ingress and egress firewall rules minimizes the ports and services
exposed to a network-based attacker, whilst also restricting egress routes within or out of
the cluster in the event that a compromised component attempts to form an outbound
connection.
Audit:
329 | P a g e
this will return:
{
"tags": "[TAG]",
"serviceaccount": "[SERVICE_ACCOUNT]"
"network":
"https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/[PROJECT_ID]/global/networks/
[NETWORK]"
}
Then, observe the firewall rules applied to the instance by using the following command,
replacing [TAG] and [SERVICE_ACCOUNT] as appropriate:
Firewall rules may also be applied to a network without specifically targeting Tags or
Service Accounts. These can be observed using the following, replacing [NETWORK] as
appropriate:
330 | P a g e
--filter="network.list():[NETWORK] AND -targetTags.list():* AND -
targetServiceAccounts.list():*"
Remediation:
Impact:
All instances targeted by a firewall rule, either using a tag or a service account will be
affected. Ensure there are no adverse effects on other instances using the target tag or
service account before implementing the firewall rule.
Default Value:
Every VPC network has two implied firewall rules. These rules exist, but are not shown in
the Cloud Console:
331 | P a g e
• The implied allow egress rule: An egress rule whose action is allow, destination is
0.0.0.0/0, and priority is the lowest possible (65535) lets any instance send traffic
to any destination, except for traffic blocked by GCP. Outbound access may be
restricted by a higher priority firewall rule. Internet access is allowed if no other
firewall rules deny outbound traffic and if the instance has an external IP address or
uses a NAT instance.
• The implied deny ingress rule: An ingress rule whose action is deny, source is
0.0.0.0/0, and priority is the lowest possible (65535) protects all instances by
blocking incoming traffic to them. Incoming access may be allowed by a higher
priority rule. Note that the default network includes some additional rules that
override this one, allowing certain types of incoming traffic.
The implied rules cannot be removed, but they have the lowest possible priorities.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/firewalls
2. https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/using-firewalls
CIS Controls:
Version 7
332 | P a g e
6.6.7 Ensure Network Policy is Enabled and set as appropriate (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Use Network Policy to restrict pod to pod traffic within a cluster and segregate workloads.
Rationale:
By default, all pod to pod traffic within a cluster is allowed. Network Policy creates a pod-
level firewall that can be used to restrict traffic between sources. Pod traffic is restricted by
having a Network Policy that selects it (through the use of labels). Once there is any
Network Policy in a namespace selecting a particular pod, that pod will reject any
connections that are not allowed by any Network Policy. Other pods in the namespace that
are not selected by any Network Policy will continue to accept all traffic.
Network Policies are managed via the Kubernetes Network Policy API and enforced by a
network plugin, simply creating the resource without a compatible network plugin to
implement it will have no effect. GKE supports Network Policy enforcement through the
use of Calico.
Audit:
333 | P a g e
The output of the above command should be:
{
"enabled": true
}
if Network Policy is enabled. If Network policy is disabled, the above command output will
return null ({ }).
Remediation:
Impact:
Network Policy requires the Network Policy add-on. This add-on is included automatically
when a cluster with Network Policy is created, but for an existing cluster, needs to be
added prior to enabling Network Policy.
Enabling/Disabling Network Policy causes a rolling update of all cluster nodes, similar to
performing a cluster upgrade. This operation is long-running and will block other
operations on the cluster (including delete) until it has run to completion.
334 | P a g e
If Network Policy is used, a cluster must have at least 2 nodes of type n1-standard-1 or
higher. The recommended minimum size cluster to run Network Policy enforcement is 3
n1-standard-1 instances.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/network-policy
CIS Controls:
Version 7
9.2 Ensure Only Approved Ports, Protocols and Services Are Running
Ensure that only network ports, protocols, and services listening on a system with
validated business needs, are running on each system.
335 | P a g e
6.6.8 Ensure use of Google-managed SSL Certificates (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Rationale:
Google-managed SSL Certificates are provisioned, renewed, and managed for your domain
names. This is only available for HTTPS load balancers created using Ingress Resources,
and not TCP/UDP load balancers created using Service of type:LoadBalancer.
Audit:
You will need to consider using ingresses instead of these services in order to use Google
managed SSL certificates.
For the ingresses within your cluster, run the following command:
The above command should return the name of the ingress, namespace, annotations and
status. Check that the following annotation is present to ensure managed certificates are
referenced.
"annotations": {
...
"networking.gke.io/managed-certificates": "[EXAMPLE_CERTIFICATE]"
},
336 | P a g e
For completeness, run the following command to ensure that the managed certificate
resource exists:
Remediation:
Impact:
Google-managed SSL Certificates are less flexible than certificates you obtain and manage
yourself. Managed certificates support a single, non-wildcard domain. Self-managed
certificates can support wildcards and multiple subject alternative names (SANs).
Default Value:
By default, Google-managed SSL Certificates are not created when an Ingress resource is
defined.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/managed-certs
CIS Controls:
Version 7
337 | P a g e
6.7 Logging
This section contains recommendations relating to security-related logging in GKE.
• Level 1
Description:
Send logs and metrics to a remote aggregator to mitigate the risk of local tampering in the
event of a breach.
Rationale:
Exporting logs and metrics to a dedicated, persistent datastore such as Stackdriver ensures
availability of audit data following a cluster security event, and provides a central location
for analysis of log and metric data collated from multiple sources.
Currently, there are two mutually exclusive variants of Stackdriver available for use with
GKE clusters: Legacy Stackdriver Support and Stackdriver Kubernetes Engine Monitoring
Support.
Although Stackdriver Kubernetes Engine Monitoring is the preferred option, starting with
GKE versions 1.12.7 and 1.13, Legacy Stackdriver is the default option up through GKE
version 1.13. The use of either of these services is sufficient to pass the benchmark
recommendation.
However, note that as Legacy Stackdriver Support is not getting any improvements and
lacks features present in Stackdriver Kubernetes Engine Monitoring, Legacy Stackdriver
Support may be deprecated in favor of Stackdriver Kubernetes Engine Monitoring Support
in future versions of this benchmark.
338 | P a g e
Audit:
For Monitoring:
339 | P a g e
The output of the above commands should return logging.googleapis.com/kubernetes
and monitoring.googleapis.com/kubernetes respectively if Stackdriver Kubernetes
Engine Monitoring is Enabled.
Remediation:
340 | P a g e
1. Go to Kubernetes Engine by visiting
https://console.cloud.google.com/kubernetes/list
2. Select Kubernetes clusters for which logging is disabled
3. Click on EDIT
4. Set 'Legacy Stackdriver Logging' to 'Enabled'
5. Click SAVE.
For Monitoring:
To enable Legacy Stackdriver Monitoring for an existing cluster, run the following
command:
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/kubernetes-engine/
2. https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/kubernetes-engine/legacy-
stackdriver/monitoring
3. https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/kubernetes-engine/legacy-
stackdriver/logging
4. https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/kubernetes-engine/migration
CIS Controls:
Version 7
342 | P a g e
6.7.2 Enable Linux auditd logging (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Run the auditd logging daemon to obtain verbose operating system logs from GKE nodes
running Container-Optimized OS (COS).
Rationale:
Auditd logs provide valuable information about the state of the cluster and workloads, such
as error messages, login attempts, and binary executions. This information can be used to
debug issues or to investigate security incidents.
Audit:
343 | P a g e
The above command returns the name, namespace and status of the daemonsets that use
the Stackdriver logging agent. The example auditd logging daemonset has a description
within the annotation as output by the command above:
{
"name": "cos-auditd-logging",
"annotations": "DaemonSet that enables Linux auditd logging on COS nodes.",
"namespace": "cos-auditd",
"status": {...
}
}
Ensure that the status fields return that the daemonset is running as expected.
Remediation:
curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/k8s-node-
tools/master/os-audit/cos-auditd-logging.yaml > cos-auditd-logging.yaml
Verify that the logging Pods have started. If you defined a different Namespace in your
manifests, replace cos-auditd with the name of the namespace you're using:
Impact:
Increased logging activity on a node increases resource usage on that node, which may
affect the performance of your workload and may incur additional resource costs. Audit
logs sent to Stackdriver consume log quota from the project. You may need to increase your
log quota and storage to accommodate the additional logs.
Note that the provided logging daemonset only works on nodes running Container-
Optimized OS (COS).
Default Value:
By default, the auditd logging daemonset is not launched when a GKE cluster is created.
344 | P a g e
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/linux-auditd-logging
CIS Controls:
Version 7
345 | P a g e
6.8 Authentication and Authorization
This section contains recommendations relating to authentication and authorization in
GKE.
• Level 1
Description:
Disable Basic Authentication (basic auth) for API server authentication as it uses static
passwords which need to be rotated.
Rationale:
GKE manages authentication via gcloud using the OpenID Connect token method, setting up
the Kubernetes configuration, getting an access token, and keeping it up to date. This
means Basic Authentication using static passwords and Client Certificate authentication,
which both require additional management overhead of key management and rotation, are
not necessary and should be disabled.
When Basic Authentication is disabled, you will still be able to authenticate to the cluster
with other authentication methods, such as OpenID Connect tokens. See also
Recommendation 6.8.2 to disable authentication using Client Certificates.
Audit:
346 | P a g e
4. Within the 'Cluster Credentials' pop-up the message, "Basic authentication for this
cluster is disabled " should be displayed, and the field 'Basic Auth credentials
(Username and Password)' missing.
The output of the above command should return false, if Basic Authentication is disabled.
If Basic Authentication is enabled, the above command will return true.
Remediation:
Impact:
Users will no longer be able to authenticate with a static password. You will have to
configure and use alternate authentication mechanisms, such as OpenID Connect tokens.
Default Value:
Clusters created from GKE version 1.12 have Basic Authentication and Client Certificate
issuance disabled by default.
347 | P a g e
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/hardening-your-
cluster#restrict_authn_methods
CIS Controls:
Version 7
348 | P a g e
6.8.2 Ensure authentication using Client Certificates is Disabled (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Disable Client Certificates, which require certificate rotation, for authentication. Instead,
use another authentication method like OpenID Connect.
Rationale:
With Client Certificate authentication, a client presents a certificate that the API server
verifies with the specified Certificate Authority. In GKE, Client Certificates are signed by the
cluster root Certificate Authority. When retrieved, the Client Certificate is only base64
encoded and not encrypted.
GKE manages authentication via gcloud for you using the OpenID Connect token method,
setting up the Kubernetes configuration, getting an access token, and keeping it up to date.
This means Basic Authentication using static passwords and Client Certificate
authentication, which both require additional management overhead of key management
and rotation, are not necessary and should be disabled.
When Client Certificate authentication is disabled, you will still be able to authenticate to
the cluster with other authentication methods, such as OpenID Connect tokens. See also
Recommendation 6.8.1 to disable authentication using static passwords, known as Basic
Authentication.
Audit:
349 | P a g e
1.1.3.27 Using Command line:
To check that the client certificate has not been issued, run the following command:
The output of the above command returns null ({ }) if the client certificate has not been
issued for the cluster (Client Certificate authentication is disabled).
Remediation:
Currently, there is no way to remove a client certificate from an existing cluster. Thus, a
new cluster must be created.
Impact:
Users will no longer be able to authenticate with the pre-provisioned x509 certificate. You
will have to configure and use alternate authentication mechanisms, such as OpenID
Connect tokens.
Default Value:
Clusters created from GKE version 1.12 have Basic Authentication and Client Certificate
issuance disabled by default.
350 | P a g e
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/hardening-your-
cluster#restrict_authn_methods
CIS Controls:
Version 7
351 | P a g e
6.8.3 Manage Kubernetes RBAC users with Google Groups for GKE (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Cluster Administrators should leverage G Suite Groups and Cloud IAM to assign Kubernetes
user roles to a collection of users, instead of to individual emails using only Cloud IAM.
Rationale:
On- and off-boarding users is often difficult to automate and prone to error. Using a single
source of truth for user permissions via G Suite Groups reduces the number of locations
that an individual must be off-boarded from, and prevents users gaining unique
permissions sets that increase the cost of audit.
Audit:
Remediation:
352 | P a g e
Finally create Roles, ClusterRoles, RoleBindings, and ClusterRoleBindings that
reference your G Suite Groups.
Impact:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/role-based-access-
control#google-groups-for-gke
CIS Controls:
Version 7
353 | P a g e
6.8.4 Ensure Legacy Authorization (ABAC) is Disabled (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Legacy Authorization, also known as Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) has been
superseded by Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and is not under active development.
RBAC is the recommended way to manage permissions in Kubernetes.
Rationale:
Audit:
The output should return null ({}) if Legacy Authorization is Disabled. If Legacy
Authorization is Enabled, the above command will return true value.
354 | P a g e
Remediation:
Impact:
Once the cluster has the legacy authorizer disabled, you must grant your user the ability to
create authorization roles using RBAC to ensure that your role-based access control
permissions take effect.
Default Value:
Kubernetes Engine clusters running GKE version 1.8 and later disable the legacy
authorization system by default, and thus role-based access control permissions take effect
with no special action required.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/role-based-access-
control
2. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/hardening-your-
cluster#leave_abac_disabled_default_for_110
Notes:
On clusters running GKE 1.6 or 1.7, Kubernetes Service accounts have full permissions on
the Kubernetes API by default. To ensure that your role-based access control permissions
take effect for a Kubernetes service account, you must create or update your cluster with
the option --no-enable-legacy-authorization. This requirement is removed for clusters
running GKE version 1.8 or higher.
355 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
356 | P a g e
6.9 Storage
This section contains recommendations relating to security-related configurations for
storage in GKE.
• Level 1
Description:
Use Customer-Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK) to encrypt node boot and dynamically-
provisioned attached Google Compute Engine Persistent Disks (PDs) using keys managed
within Cloud Key Management Service (Cloud KMS).
Rationale:
GCE persistent disks are encrypted at rest by default using envelope encryption with keys
managed by Google. For additional protection, users can manage the Key Encryption Keys
using Cloud KMS.
Audit:
357 | P a g e
1.1.3.36 Using Command Line:
FOR NODE BOOT DISKS:
Run this command:
Verify that the output of the above command includes a diskType of either pd-standard or
pd-ssd, and the bootDiskKmsKey is specified as the desired key.
FOR ATTACHED DISKS:
Identify the Persistent Volumes Used by the cluster:
For each volume used, check that it is encrypted using a customer managed key by running
the following command:
This returns null ({ }) if a customer-managed encryption key is not used to encrypt the
disk.
Remediation:
This cannot be remediated by updating an existing cluster. You must either recreate the
desired node pool or create a new cluster.
358 | P a g e
1. Go to Kubernetes Engine by visiting
https://console.cloud.google.com/kubernetes/list
2. Click CREATE CLUSTER
3. Under the 'default-pool' heading, click 'More options'
4. In the Node pool edit window, select 'Standard persistent disk' or 'SSD Persistent
Disk' as the Boot disk type
5. Select 'Enable customer-managed encryption for Boot Disk' check box and choose
the Cloud KMS encryption key you desire
6. Configure the rest of the cluster settings as desired
7. Click CREATE.
Click Save.
FOR ATTACHED DISKS:
This is not possible using Google Cloud Console.
Create a cluster using customer-managed encryption keys for the node boot disk, of
[DISK_TYPE] either pd-standard or pd-ssd:
Impact:
359 | P a g e
If you are configuring CMEK with a regional cluster, the cluster must run GKE 1.14 or
higher.
Default Value:
Persistent disks are encrypted at rest by default, but are not encrypted using Customer-
Managed Encryption Keys by default. By default, the Compute Engine Persistent Disk CSI
Driver is not provisioned within the cluster.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/using-cmek
2. https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/disks/customer-managed-encryption
3. https://cloud.google.com/security/encryption-at-rest/default-encryption/
CIS Controls:
Version 7
360 | P a g e
6.10 Other Cluster Configurations
This section contains recommendations relating to any remaining security-related cluster
configurations in GKE.
• Level 1
Description:
The Kubernetes Web UI (Dashboard) has been a historical source of vulnerability and
should only be deployed when necessary.
Rationale:
You should disable the Kubernetes Web UI (Dashboard) when running on Kubernetes
Engine. The Kubernetes Web UI is backed by a highly privileged Kubernetes Service
Account.
The Google Cloud Console provides all the required functionality of the Kubernetes Web UI
and leverages Cloud IAM to restrict user access to sensitive cluster controls and settings.
Audit:
Ensure the output of the above command has JSON key attribute disabled set to true:
361 | P a g e
{
"disabled": true
}
Remediation:
Impact:
Users will be required to manage cluster resources using the Google Cloud Console or the
command line. These require appropriate permissions. To use the command line, this
requires the installation of the command line client, kubectl, on the user's device (this is
already included in Cloud Shell) and knowledge of command line operations.
Default Value:
The Kubernetes web UI (Dashboard) does not have admin access by default in GKE 1.7 and
higher. The Kubernetes web UI is disabled by default in GKE 1.10 and higher. In GKE 1.15
and higher, the Kubernetes web UI add-on KubernetesDashboard is no longer supported as
a managed add-on.
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/hardening-your-
cluster#disable_kubernetes_dashboard
362 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
363 | P a g e
6.10.2 Ensure that Alpha clusters are not used for production workloads
(Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Alpha clusters are not covered by an SLA and are not production-ready.
Rationale:
Alpha clusters are designed for early adopters to experiment with workloads that take
advantage of new features before those features are production-ready. They have all
Kubernetes API features enabled, but are not covered by the GKE SLA, do not receive
security updates, have node auto-upgrade and node auto-repair disabled, and cannot be
upgraded. They are also automatically deleted after 30 days.
Audit:
The output of the above command will return true if it is an Alpha cluster.
364 | P a g e
Remediation:
Impact:
Users and workloads will not be able to take advantage of features included within Alpha
clusters.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/alpha-clusters
CIS Controls:
Version 7
365 | P a g e
6.10.3 Ensure Pod Security Policy is Enabled and set as appropriate (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Pod Security Policy should be used to prevent privileged containers where possible and
enforce namespace and workload configurations.
Rationale:
A Pod Security Policy is a cluster-level resource that controls security sensitive aspects of
the pod specification. A PodSecurityPolicy object defines a set of conditions that a pod
must run with in order to be accepted into the system, as well as defaults for the related
fields. When a request to create or update a Pod does not meet the conditions in the Pod
Security Policy, that request is rejected and an error is returned. The Pod Security Policy
admission controller validates requests against available Pod Security Policies.
Audit:
Ensure the output of the above command has JSON key attribute enabled set to true:
366 | P a g e
{
"enabled": true
}
If Pod Security Policy is disabled, the above command output will return null ({ }).
Remediation:
Impact:
If you enable the Pod Security Policy controller without first defining and authorizing any
actual policies, no users, controllers, or service accounts can create or update Pods. If you
are working with an existing cluster, you should define and authorize policies before
enabling the controller.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/pod-security-policies
2. https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/policy/pod-security-policy
Notes:
Pod Security Policy is Beta in Kubernetes and in GKE. This feature is not covered by any
SLA or deprecation policy and might be subject to backward-incompatible changes.
367 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
368 | P a g e
6.10.4 Consider GKE Sandbox for running untrusted workloads (Not
Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Use GKE Sandbox to restrict untrusted workloads as an additional layer of protection when
running in a multi-tenant environment.
Rationale:
GKE Sandbox provides an extra layer of security to prevent untrusted code from affecting
the host kernel on your cluster nodes.
When you enable GKE Sandbox on a Node pool, a sandbox is created for each Pod running
on a node in that Node pool. In addition, nodes running sandboxed Pods are prevented
from accessing other GCP services or cluster metadata. Each sandbox uses its own
userspace kernel.
Multi-tenant clusters and clusters whose containers run untrusted workloads are more
exposed to security vulnerabilities than other clusters. Examples include SaaS providers,
web-hosting providers, or other organizations that allow their users to upload and run
code. A flaw in the container runtime or in the host kernel could allow a process running
within a container to 'escape' the container and affect the node's kernel, potentially
bringing down the node.
The potential also exists for a malicious tenant to gain access to and exfiltrate another
tenant's data in memory or on disk, by exploiting such a defect.
Audit:
The output of the above command will return the following if the Node pool is running a
sandbox:
{
"sandboxType":"gvisor"
}
Remediation:
Once a node pool is created, GKE Sandbox cannot be enabled, rather a new node pool is
required. The default node pool (the first node pool in your cluster, created when the
cluster is created) cannot use GKE Sandbox.
370 | P a g e
Impact:
Using GKE Sandbox requires the node image to be set to Container-Optimized OS with
containerd (cos_containerd).
It is not currently possible to use GKE Sandbox along with the following Kubernetes
features:
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/sandbox-pods
Notes:
The default node pool (the first node pool in your cluster, created when the cluster is
created) cannot use GKE Sandbox.
When using GKE Sandbox, your cluster must have at least two node pools. You must always
have at least one node pool where GKE Sandbox is disabled. This node pool must contain at
least one node, even if all your workloads are sandboxed.
It is optional but recommended that you enable Stackdriver Logging and Stackdriver
Monitoring, by adding the flag --enable-stackdriver-kubernetes. gVisor messages are
logged.
371 | P a g e
CIS Controls:
Version 7
372 | P a g e
6.10.5 Ensure use of Binary Authorization (Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 2
Description:
Binary Authorization helps to protect supply-chain security by only allowing images with
verifiable cryptographically signed metadata into the cluster.
Rationale:
Binary Authorization provides software supply-chain security for images that you deploy
to GKE from Google Container Registry (GCR) or another container image registry.
Audit:
373 | P a g e
The above command output will be the following if Binary Authorization is enabled:
{
"enabled": true
}
Ensure that the current policy is not configured to allow all images (evaluationMode:
ALWAYS_ALLOW):
cat current-policy.yaml
...
defaultAdmissionRule:
evaluationMode: ALWAYS_ALLOW
Remediation:
Create a Binary Authorization Policy using the Binary Authorization Policy Reference
(https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/policy-yaml-reference) for
374 | P a g e
guidance.
Import the policy file into Binary Authorization:
Impact:
Care must be taken when defining policy in order to prevent inadvertent denial of
container image deployments. Depending on policy, attestations for existing container
images running within the cluster may need to be created before those images are
redeployed or pulled as part of the pod churn.
To prevent key system images from being denied deployment, consider the use of global
policy evaluation mode, which uses a global policy provided by Google and exempts a list of
Google-provided system images from further policy evaluation.
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/
CIS Controls:
Version 7
375 | P a g e
6.10.6 Enable Cloud Security Command Center (Cloud SCC) (Not Scored)
Profile Applicability:
• Level 1
Description:
Enable Cloud Security Command Center (Cloud SCC) to provide a centralized view of
security for your GKE clusters.
Rationale:
Cloud Security Command Center (Cloud SCC) is the canonical security and data risk
database for GCP. Cloud SCC enables you to understand your security and data attack
surface by providing asset inventory, discovery, search, and management.
Audit:
If the output of the above command returns GKE assets, Cloud SCC is enabled and indexing
GKE resources.
Remediation:
Impact:
None.
376 | P a g e
Default Value:
References:
1. https://cloud.google.com/security-command-center/
2. https://cloud.google.com/security-command-center/docs/quickstart-scc-setup
Notes:
Cloud SCC is only available at the organization level. Your GCP projects must belong to a
GCP organization.
CIS Controls:
Version 7
11 Secure Configuration for Network Devices, such as Firewalls, Routers and Switches
Secure Configuration for Network Devices, such as Firewalls, Routers and Switches
377 | P a g e
12 Boundary Defense
Boundary Defense
13 Data Protection
Data Protection
378 | P a g e
Appendix: Summary Table
Control Set
Correctly
Yes No
1 Control Plane Components
1.1 Master Node Configuration Files
1.1.1 Ensure that the API server pod specification file permissions
o o
are set to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.2 Ensure that the API server pod specification file ownership is
o o
set to root:root (Not Scored)
1.1.3 Ensure that the controller manager pod specification file
o o
permissions are set to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.4 Ensure that the controller manager pod specification file
o o
ownership is set to root:root (Not Scored)
1.1.5 Ensure that the scheduler pod specification file permissions
o o
are set to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.6 Ensure that the scheduler pod specification file ownership is
o o
set to root:root (Not Scored)
1.1.7 Ensure that the etcd pod specification file permissions are set
o o
to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.8 Ensure that the etcd pod specification file ownership is set to
o o
root:root (Not Scored)
1.1.9 Ensure that the Container Network Interface file permissions
o o
are set to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.10 Ensure that the Container Network Interface file ownership is
o o
set to root:root (Not Scored)
1.1.11 Ensure that the etcd data directory permissions are set to 700
o o
or more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.12 Ensure that the etcd data directory ownership is set to
o o
etcd:etcd (Not Scored)
1.1.13 Ensure that the admin.conf file permissions are set to 644 or
o o
more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.14 Ensure that the admin.conf file ownership is set to root:root
o o
(Not Scored)
1.1.15 Ensure that the scheduler.conf file permissions are set to 644
o o
or more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.16 Ensure that the scheduler.conf file ownership is set to
o o
root:root (Not Scored)
1.1.17 Ensure that the controller-manager.conf file permissions are
o o
set to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.18 Ensure that the controller-manager.conf file ownership is set
o o
to root:root (Not Scored)
379 | P a g e
1.1.19 Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI directory and file ownership
o o
is set to root:root (Not Scored)
1.1.20 Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI certificate file permissions
o o
are set to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
1.1.21 Ensure that the Kubernetes PKI key file permissions are set to
o o
600 (Not Scored)
1.2 API Server
1.2.1 Ensure that the --anonymous-auth argument is set to false
o o
(Not Scored)
1.2.2 Ensure that the --basic-auth-file argument is not set (Not
o o
Scored)
1.2.3 Ensure that the --token-auth-file parameter is not set (Not
o o
Scored)
1.2.4 Ensure that the --kubelet-https argument is set to true (Not
o o
Scored)
1.2.5 Ensure that the --kubelet-client-certificate and --kubelet-
o o
client-key arguments are set as appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.6 Ensure that the --kubelet-certificate-authority argument is set
o o
as appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.7 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument is not set to
o o
AlwaysAllow (Not Scored)
1.2.8 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument includes
o o
Node (Not Scored)
1.2.9 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument includes
o o
RBAC (Not Scored)
1.2.10 Ensure that the admission control plugin EventRateLimit is
o o
set (Not Scored)
1.2.11 Ensure that the admission control plugin AlwaysAdmit is not
o o
set (Not Scored)
1.2.12 Ensure that the admission control plugin AlwaysPullImages is
o o
set (Not Scored)
1.2.13 Ensure that the admission control plugin
SecurityContextDeny is set if PodSecurityPolicy is not used o o
(Not Scored)
1.2.14 Ensure that the admission control plugin ServiceAccount is
o o
set (Not Scored)
1.2.15 Ensure that the admission control plugin NamespaceLifecycle
o o
is set (Not Scored)
1.2.16 Ensure that the admission control plugin PodSecurityPolicy is
o o
set (Not Scored)
1.2.17 Ensure that the admission control plugin NodeRestriction is
o o
set (Not Scored)
1.2.18 Ensure that the --insecure-bind-address argument is not set
o o
(Not Scored)
380 | P a g e
1.2.19 Ensure that the --insecure-port argument is set to 0 (Not
o o
Scored)
1.2.20 Ensure that the --secure-port argument is not set to 0 (Not
o o
Scored)
1.2.21 Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false (Not
o o
Scored)
1.2.22 Ensure that the --audit-log-path argument is set (Not Scored) o o
1.2.23 Ensure that the --audit-log-maxage argument is set to 30 or as
o o
appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.24 Ensure that the --audit-log-maxbackup argument is set to 10
o o
or as appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.25 Ensure that the --audit-log-maxsize argument is set to 100 or
o o
as appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.26 Ensure that the --request-timeout argument is set as
o o
appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.27 Ensure that the --service-account-lookup argument is set to
o o
true (Not Scored)
1.2.28 Ensure that the --service-account-key-file argument is set as
o o
appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.29 Ensure that the --etcd-certfile and --etcd-keyfile arguments
o o
are set as appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.30 Ensure that the --tls-cert-file and --tls-private-key-file
o o
arguments are set as appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.31 Ensure that the --client-ca-file argument is set as appropriate
o o
(Not Scored)
1.2.32 Ensure that the --etcd-cafile argument is set as appropriate
o o
(Not Scored)
1.2.33 Ensure that the --encryption-provider-config argument is set
o o
as appropriate (Not Scored)
1.2.34 Ensure that encryption providers are appropriately
o o
configured (Not Scored)
1.2.35 Ensure that the API Server only makes use of Strong
o o
Cryptographic Ciphers (Not Scored)
1.3 Controller Manager
1.3.1 Ensure that the --terminated-pod-gc-threshold argument is
o o
set as appropriate (Not Scored)
1.3.2 Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false (Not
o o
Scored)
1.3.3 Ensure that the --use-service-account-credentials argument is
o o
set to true (Not Scored)
1.3.4 Ensure that the --service-account-private-key-file argument
o o
is set as appropriate (Not Scored)
1.3.5 Ensure that the --root-ca-file argument is set as appropriate
o o
(Not Scored)
381 | P a g e
1.3.6 Ensure that the RotateKubeletServerCertificate argument is
o o
set to true (Not Scored)
1.3.7 Ensure that the --bind-address argument is set to 127.0.0.1
o o
(Not Scored)
1.4 Scheduler
1.4.1 Ensure that the --profiling argument is set to false (Not
o o
Scored)
1.4.2 Ensure that the --bind-address argument is set to 127.0.0.1
o o
(Not Scored)
2 etcd
2.1 Ensure that the --cert-file and --key-file arguments are set as
o o
appropriate (Not Scored)
2.2 Ensure that the --client-cert-auth argument is set to true (Not
o o
Scored)
2.3 Ensure that the --auto-tls argument is not set to true (Not
o o
Scored)
2.4 Ensure that the --peer-cert-file and --peer-key-file arguments
o o
are set as appropriate (Not Scored)
2.5 Ensure that the --peer-client-cert-auth argument is set to true
o o
(Not Scored)
2.6 Ensure that the --peer-auto-tls argument is not set to true
o o
(Not Scored)
2.7 Ensure that a unique Certificate Authority is used for etcd
o o
(Not Scored)
3 Control Plane Configuration
3.1 Authentication and Authorization
3.1.1 Client certificate authentication should not be used for users
o o
(Not Scored)
3.2 Logging
3.2.1 Ensure that a minimal audit policy is created (Not Scored) o o
3.2.2 Ensure that the audit policy covers key security concerns (Not
o o
Scored)
4 Worker Nodes
4.1 Worker Node Configuration Files
4.1.1 Ensure that the kubelet service file permissions are set to 644
o o
or more restrictive (Not Scored)
4.1.2 Ensure that the kubelet service file ownership is set to
o o
root:root (Not Scored)
4.1.3 Ensure that the proxy kubeconfig file permissions are set to
o o
644 or more restrictive (Scored)
4.1.4 Ensure that the proxy kubeconfig file ownership is set to
o o
root:root (Scored)
4.1.5 Ensure that the kubelet.conf file permissions are set to 644 or
o o
more restrictive (Not Scored)
382 | P a g e
4.1.6 Ensure that the kubelet.conf file ownership is set to root:root
o o
(Not Scored)
4.1.7 Ensure that the certificate authorities file permissions are set
o o
to 644 or more restrictive (Not Scored)
4.1.8 Ensure that the client certificate authorities file ownership is
o o
set to root:root (Not Scored)
4.1.9 Ensure that the kubelet configuration file has permissions set
o o
to 644 or more restrictive (Scored)
4.1.10 Ensure that the kubelet configuration file ownership is set to
o o
root:root (Scored)
4.2 Kubelet
4.2.1 Ensure that the --anonymous-auth argument is set to false
o o
(Scored)
4.2.2 Ensure that the --authorization-mode argument is not set to
o o
AlwaysAllow (Scored)
4.2.3 Ensure that the --client-ca-file argument is set as appropriate
o o
(Scored)
4.2.4 Ensure that the --read-only-port argument is set to 0 (Scored) o o
4.2.5 Ensure that the --streaming-connection-idle-timeout
o o
argument is not set to 0 (Scored)
4.2.6 Ensure that the --protect-kernel-defaults argument is set to
o o
true (Scored)
4.2.7 Ensure that the --make-iptables-util-chains argument is set to
o o
true (Scored)
4.2.8 Ensure that the --hostname-override argument is not set
o o
(Scored)
4.2.9 Ensure that the --event-qps argument is set to 0 or a level
o o
which ensures appropriate event capture (Scored)
4.2.10 Ensure that the --tls-cert-file and --tls-private-key-file
o o
arguments are set as appropriate (Scored)
4.2.11 Ensure that the --rotate-certificates argument is not set to
o o
false (Scored)
4.2.12 Ensure that the RotateKubeletServerCertificate argument is
o o
set to true (Scored)
4.2.13 Ensure that the Kubelet only makes use of Strong
o o
Cryptographic Ciphers (Not Scored)
5 Policies
5.1 RBAC and Service Accounts
5.1.1 Ensure that the cluster-admin role is only used where
o o
required (Not Scored)
5.1.2 Minimize access to secrets (Not Scored) o o
5.1.3 Minimize wildcard use in Roles and ClusterRoles (Not Scored) o o
5.1.4 Minimize access to create pods (Not Scored) o o
5.1.5 Ensure that default service accounts are not actively used. o o
383 | P a g e
(Scored)
5.1.6 Ensure that Service Account Tokens are only mounted where
o o
necessary (Not Scored)
5.2 Pod Security Policies
5.2.1 Minimize the admission of privileged containers (Scored) o o
5.2.2 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the
o o
host process ID namespace (Scored)
5.2.3 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the
o o
host IPC namespace (Scored)
5.2.4 Minimize the admission of containers wishing to share the
o o
host network namespace (Scored)
5.2.5 Minimize the admission of containers with
o o
allowPrivilegeEscalation (Scored)
5.2.6 Minimize the admission of root containers (Scored) o o
5.2.7 Minimize the admission of containers with the NET_RAW
o o
capability (Scored)
5.2.8 Minimize the admission of containers with added capabilities
o o
(Scored)
5.2.9 Minimize the admission of containers with capabilities
o o
assigned (Scored)
5.3 Network Policies and CNI
5.3.1 Ensure that the CNI in use supports Network Policies (Not
o o
Scored)
5.3.2 Ensure that all Namespaces have Network Policies defined
o o
(Scored)
5.4 Secrets Management
5.4.1 Prefer using secrets as files over secrets as environment
o o
variables (Not Scored)
5.4.2 Consider external secret storage (Not Scored) o o
5.5 Extensible Admission Control
5.5.1 Configure Image Provenance using ImagePolicyWebhook
o o
admission controller (Not Scored)
5.6 General Policies
5.6.1 Create administrative boundaries between resources using
o o
namespaces (Not Scored)
5.6.2 Ensure that the seccomp profile is set to docker/default in
o o
your pod definitions (Not Scored)
5.6.3 Apply Security Context to Your Pods and Containers (Not
o o
Scored)
5.6.4 The default namespace should not be used (Scored) o o
6 Managed services
6.1 Image Registry and Image Scanning
6.1.1 Ensure Image Vulnerability Scanning using GCR Container o o
384 | P a g e
Analysis or a third-party provider (Scored)
6.1.2 Minimize user access to GCR (Scored) o o
6.1.3 Minimize cluster access to read-only for GCR (Scored) o o
6.1.4 Minimize Container Registries to only those approved (Not
o o
Scored)
6.2 Identity and Access Management (IAM)
6.2.1 Ensure GKE clusters are not running using the Compute
o o
Engine default service account (Scored)
6.2.2 Prefer using dedicated GCP Service Accounts and Workload
o o
Identity (Not Scored)
6.3 Cloud Key Management Service (Cloud KMS)
6.3.1 Ensure Kubernetes Secrets are encrypted using keys managed
o o
in Cloud KMS (Scored)
6.4 Node Metadata
6.4.1 Ensure legacy Compute Engine instance metadata APIs are
o o
Disabled (Scored)
6.4.2 Ensure the GKE Metadata Server is Enabled (Not Scored) o o
6.5 Node Configuration and Maintenance
6.5.1 Ensure Container-Optimized OS (COS) is used for GKE node
o o
images (Scored)
6.5.2 Ensure Node Auto-Repair is enabled for GKE nodes (Scored) o o
6.5.3 Ensure Node Auto-Upgrade is enabled for GKE nodes (Scored) o o
6.5.4 Automate GKE version management using Release Channels
o o
(Not Scored)
6.5.5 Ensure Shielded GKE Nodes are Enabled (Not Scored) o o
6.5.6 Ensure Integrity Monitoring for Shielded GKE Nodes is
o o
Enabled (Not Scored)
6.5.7 Ensure Secure Boot for Shielded GKE Nodes is Enabled (Not
o o
Scored)
6.6 Cluster Networking
6.6.1 Enable VPC Flow Logs and Intranode Visibility (Not Scored) o o
6.6.2 Ensure use of VPC-native clusters (Scored) o o
6.6.3 Ensure Master Authorized Networks is Enabled (Scored) o o
6.6.4 Ensure clusters are created with Private Endpoint Enabled
o o
and Public Access Disabled (Scored)
6.6.5 Ensure clusters are created with Private Nodes (Scored) o o
6.6.6 Consider firewalling GKE worker nodes (Not Scored) o o
6.6.7 Ensure Network Policy is Enabled and set as appropriate (Not
o o
Scored)
6.6.8 Ensure use of Google-managed SSL Certificates (Not Scored) o o
6.7 Logging
6.7.1 Ensure Stackdriver Kubernetes Logging and Monitoring is
o o
Enabled (Scored)
385 | P a g e
6.7.2 Enable Linux auditd logging (Not Scored) o o
6.8 Authentication and Authorization
6.8.1 Ensure Basic Authentication using static passwords is
o o
Disabled (Scored)
6.8.2 Ensure authentication using Client Certificates is Disabled
o o
(Scored)
6.8.3 Manage Kubernetes RBAC users with Google Groups for GKE
o o
(Not Scored)
6.8.4 Ensure Legacy Authorization (ABAC) is Disabled (Scored) o o
6.9 Storage
6.9.1 Enable Customer-Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK) for GKE
o o
Persistent Disks (PD) (Not Scored)
6.10 Other Cluster Configurations
6.10.1 Ensure Kubernetes Web UI is Disabled (Scored) o o
6.10.2 Ensure that Alpha clusters are not used for production
o o
workloads (Scored)
6.10.3 Ensure Pod Security Policy is Enabled and set as appropriate
o o
(Not Scored)
6.10.4 Consider GKE Sandbox for running untrusted workloads (Not
o o
Scored)
6.10.5 Ensure use of Binary Authorization (Scored) o o
6.10.6 Enable Cloud Security Command Center (Cloud SCC) (Not
o o
Scored)
386 | P a g e
387 | P a g e