Control Systems Engineering 5
Control Systems Engineering 5
Summary 21
electrical engineering, and mechanical engineering. Whether or not you work in the space
program, as a control systems engineer you will apply broad-based knowledge to the
solution of engineering control problems. You will have the opportunity to expand your
engineering horizons beyond your university curriculum.
You are now aware of future opportunities. But for now, what advantages does this
course offer to a student of control systems (other than the fact that you need it to graduate)?
Engineering curricula tend to emphasize bottom-up design. That is, you start from the
components, develop circuits, and then assemble a product. In top-down design, a high-level
picture of the requirements is first formulated; then the functions and hardware required to
implement the system are determined. You will be able to take a top-down systems approach
as a result of this course.
A major reason for not teaching top-down design throughout the curriculum is the
high level of mathematics initially required for the systems approach. For example, control
systems theory, which requires differential equations, could not be taught as a lower-division
course. However, while progressing through bottom-up design courses, it is difficult to see
how such design fits logically into the large picture of the product development cycle.
After completing this control systems course, you will be able to stand back and see
how your previous studies fit into the large picture. Your amplifier course or vibrations
course will take on new meaning as you begin to see the role design work plays as part of
product development. For example, as engineers, we want to describe the physical world
mathematically so that we can create systems that will benefit humanity. You will find that
you have indeed acquired, through your previous courses, the ability to model physical
systems mathematically, although at the time you might not have understood where in the
product development cycle the modeling fits. This course will clarify the analysis and design
procedures and show you how the knowledge you acquired fits into the total picture of
system design.
Understanding control systems enables students from all branches of engineering to
speak a common language and develop an appreciation and working knowledge of the other
branches. You will find that there really is not much difference among the branches of
engineering as far as the goals and applications are concerned. As you study control
systems, you will see this commonality.
Summary
Control systems contribute to every aspect of modern society. In our homes we find them in
everything from toasters to heating systems to DVD players. Control systems also have
widespread applications in science and industry, from steering ships and planes to guiding
missiles. Control systems also exist naturally; our bodies contain numerous control systems.
Even economic and psychological system representations have been proposed based on
control system theory. Control systems are used where power gain, remote control, or
conversion of the form of the input is required.
A control system has an input, a process, and an output. Control systems can be
open loop or closed loop. Open-loop systems do not monitor or correct the output for
disturbances; however, they are simpler and less expensive than closed-loop systems.
Closed-loop systems monitor the output and compare it to the input. If an error is detected,
the system corrects the output and hence corrects the effects of disturbances.
Control systems analysis and design focuses on three primary objectives:
A system must be stable in order to produce the proper transient and steady-state
response. Transient response is important because it affects the speed of the system and
influences human patience and comfort, not to mention mechanical stress. Steady-state
response determines the accuracy of the control system; it governs how closely the output
matches the desired response.
The design of a control system follows these steps:
Step 1 Determine a physical system and specifications from requirements.
Step 2 Draw a functional block diagram.
Step 3 Represent the physical system as a schematic.
Step 4 Use the schematic to obtain a mathematical model, such as a block diagram.
Step 5 Reduce the block diagram.
Step 6 Analyze and design the system to meet specified requirements and specifica-
tions that include stability, transient response, and steady-state performance.
In the next chapter we continue through the analysis and design sequence and learn how to
use the schematic to obtain a mathematical model.
Review Questions
1. Name three applications for feedback control systems.
2. Name three reasons for using feedback control systems and at least one reason for not
using them.
3. Give three examples of open-loop systems.
4. Functionally, how do closed-loop systems differ from open-loop systems?
5. State one condition under which the error signal of a feedback control system would
not be the difference between the input and the output.
6. If the error signal is not the difference between input and output, by what general name
can we describe the error signal?
7. Name two advantages of having a computer in the loop.
8. Name the three major design criteria for control systems.
9. Name the two parts of a system’s response.
10. Physically, what happens to a system that is unstable?
11. Instability is attributable to what part of the total response?
12. Describe a typical control system analysis task.
13. Describe a typical control system design task.
14. Adjustments of the forward path gain can cause changes in the transient response.
True or false?
15. Name three approaches to the mathematical modeling of control systems.
16. Briefly describe each of your answers to Question 15.
Problems
1. A variable resistor, called a potentiometer, is shown variable, the output variable, and (inside the block)
in Figure P1.1. The resistance is varied by moving a the gain, which is a constant and is the amount
wiper arm along a fixed resistance. The resistance by which the input is multiplied to obtain the output.
from A to C is fixed, but the resistance from B to C An animation PowerPoint presentation (PPT)
varies with the position of the wiper arm. If it takes 10 demonstrating this system is available for instructors
turns to move the wiper arm from A to C, draw a at www.wiley.com/college/nise. See Potentiometer.
block diagram of the potentiometer showing the input [Section 1.4: Introduction to a Case Study]
Problems 23
8. You are given a high-speed proportional solenoid valve. the system in a vertical position. Indicate the input and
A voltage proportional to the desired position of the spool output signals, intermediate signals, and main subsys-
is applied to the coil. The resulting magnetic field pro- tems. (http://segway.com)
duced by the current in the coil causes the armature to
move. A push pin connected to the armature moves the
spool. A linear voltage differential transformer (LVDT)
that outputs a voltage proportional to displacement senses
the spool’s position. This voltage can be used in a feed-
Problems 25
actuators are not present. These stimuli help the student system is to be designed in which the objective is to
adjust to correct the motion. In summary, the system minimize the drift, Y, and an angular deviation from
consists of an instructor and a student having their the vertical axes, ϕ (not shown). The disturbances
movements followed by the vision system. Their move- acting on the system’s outputs are the force, F, and the
ments are fed into a computer that finds the differences torque, M, caused by the external environment. In this
between their joint positions and provides proportional problem, the plant will have one input, the force
vibrational strength feedback to the student. Draw a block delivered by the thrusters (Fu) and two outputs, Y
diagram describing the system design. and ϕ. Note also that this is a disturbance attenuation
13. Some skillful drivers can drive and balance a four- problem, so there is no command input. Draw a block
wheeled vehicle on two wheels. To verify that a control diagram of the system indicating the disturbances F
system can also drive a car in this fashion, a prototype and M, the control signal Fu, and the outputs Y and ϕ.
using an RC (remote-controlled) car is equipped with a Your diagram should also have blocks for a controller,
feedback control system (Arndt, 2011). In a simplified the one-input two-output plant, and a block indicating
system model, the roll angle at which the car balances was how the disturbances affect each of the outputs.
calculated a priori and found to be 52.3°. This value was 15. In the Case Study of Section 1.4, an antenna azimuth angle
used as the desired input. The desired input is compared is controlled, and its corresponding block diagram is shown
with the actual roll angle and the difference is fed to a in Figure 1.8(d) in the text. There, the sensor used to
controller that feeds a servomotor indicating the desired measure the antenna’s azimuth angle is a potentiometer.
wheel steering angle that controls the vehicle’s roll angle a. Modify the block diagram if the sensor used tomeasure
on two wheels. The car’s actual roll angle is measured the antenna’s angle is an accelerometer.
using a hinged linkage that rolls along the ground next to b. Modify the block diagram if the sensor used tomeasure
the vehicle and is connected to a potentiometer. Draw a the antenna’s angle is a gyroscope.
block diagram indicating the system functions. Draw
blocks for the system controller, the steering servo, and 16. Figure P1.5 shows the topology of a photo-voltaic (PV)
system that uses solar cells to supply electrical power to a
the car dynamics. Indicate in the diagram the following
residence with hybrid electric vehicle loads (Gurkavnak,
signals: the desired roll angle, the steering wheel angle,
2009). The system consists of a PV array to collect the sun’s
and the actual car roll angle.
rays, a battery pack to store energy during the day, a dc/ac
14. Moored floating platforms are subject to external inverter to supply ac power to the load, and a bidirectional
disturbances such as waves, wind, and currents that dc/dc converter to control the terminal voltage of the solar
cause them to drift. There are certain applications, array according to a maximum power point tracking
such as diving support, drilling pipe-laying, and tank- (MPPT) algorithm. In case of sufficient solar power (solar
ing between ships in which precise positioning of insolation), the dc/dc converter charges the battery and the
moored platforms is very important (Muñoz-Mansilla, solar array supplies power to the load through the dc/ac
2011). Figure P1.4 illustrates a tethered platform in inverter. With less or no solar energy (solar non-insolation),
which side thrusters are used for positioning. A control power is supplied from the battery to the load through the
dc/dc converter and the dc/ac inverter. Thus, the dc/dc
converter must be bidirectional to be able to charge and
Y
discharge the battery. With the MPPT controller providing
the reference voltage, the converter operates as a step-up
F converter (boost) to discharge the battery if the battery is
sea level
full or a step-down (buck) converter, which charges the
battery if it is not full.7
In Figure P1.5, the Inverter is controlled by the
thrusters
Power Manager and Controller through the Current
sea floor
Controller. The Power Manager and Controller directs
the Inverter to take power either from the battery,
FIGURE P1.4 Tethered platform using side thrusters for via the Bidirectional Converter, or the solar array,
positioning6 depending upon the time of day and the battery state
6
Muñoz-Mansilla, R., Aranda, J., Diaz, J. M., Chaos, D., and Reinoso, A. J.,
Applications of QFT Robust Control Techniques to Marine Systems. 9th
7
IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation. December For a description of all other operational scenarios, refer to the above-listed
19–21, 2011, pp. 378–385. (Figure 3, p. 382). reference.