AP United States

Government and Politics:

Study Guide

AP is a registered trademark of College Board, which was not involved in the production of, and does not endorse, this
product.
Key Exam Details
The AP U.S. Government and Politics exam will test your knowledge of material typically
covered in a one-semester college introductory-level course about U.S. government and
politics. The 3-hour exam is comprised of 55 multiple-choice questions (50% of the exam) and 4
free-response questions (50% of the exam).

The exam covers the following topics:

• Foundations of American Democracy: 15–22% of test questions
• Civil Liberties and Civil Rights: 13–18% of test questions
• Interactions Between Branches of Government: 25–36% of test questions
• Political Participation: 20–27% of test questions
• American Political Beliefs and Ideologies: 10–15% of test questions

This guide will give you a review of all major exam topics, with an emphasis on the terms
covered in each exam section. Following every topic overview are sample AP multiple-choice
questions so you can get a sense of how information will be presented on test day.

Foundations of American Democracy

About 15–22% of the questions on your AP exam will cover the topic Foundations of American
Democracy.

Types of Democracy
Let’s take a look at the various types of democracy that exist in political theory.

Direct democracy allows citizens to directly govern and make laws. It is considered a chaotic
and inefficient system, especially in societies with large populations. It also has significant risks
like the majority violating the rights of the minority.

Participatory democracy values broad based public participation in governing. In theory, it

keeps government closest to the people and their opinions.

Representative democracy/republicanism is a theoretically more efficient system that allows

citizens to elect representatives who then govern for them. It allows a smaller and more
manageable group to make decisions more quickly. Republicanism retains important elements

1
of broad public participation in government while making governing less chaotic and more
efficient.

Elite democracy/elitism favors allowing the best educated and most qualified members of
society to govern in the best interests of the country. This system favors having a small group of
the best-informed people to govern.

Majoritarian democracy promotes majority rule. It places power in the hands of the majority
and allows them to govern based on their ideals, and values efficiency in governing and decisive
elections. Critics of majoritarian democracy argue that majorities can easily violate the rights of
minorities if sufficient safeguards are not in place. They also argue that majoritarian
democracy’s winner-take-all elections make politics a zero-sum game where candidates and
groups are encouraged to do whatever it takes to win.

Consensus democracy promotes the sharing of power across diverse groups. Power is
disbursed throughout the system, and therefore all groups are required to compromise with
one another. Critics of consensus democracy argue that it is inefficient and creates unnecessary
hurdles to decision making, especially when quick decisions are needed in times of crisis.

Founding Documents
The Declaration of Independence, created by the Second Continental Congress on July 4, 1776,
declares the British Colonies in North America to be a free and independent country. Authored
by Thomas Jefferson and others, the Declaration of Independence relies heavily on the
concepts of Natural Rights, Popular Sovereignty, and Social Contract Theory to argue that the
former colonies are empowered to create their own government because of the abuses
suffered under British rule.

• Natural rights are rights that exist in a “state of nature,” or where no government exists
whatsoever. English philosopher John Locke proposed these rights in his work, Two
Treatises of Government. Locke proposed that there are three basic natural rights: life,
liberty, and property. These rights are “negative” rights, which means that they are a
restriction on others. It means that other people ought not to kill us (Life), ought not to
interfere with us (Liberty), and ought not to take what is ours (Property).

• Popular sovereignty is a concept that people are the highest level of power in society.
The power of government to govern comes from the people. When people consent to
be governed, government gains its legitimacy.

• Social contract theory states that people should consent to be governed and in
exchange the government will provide protections and certain public goods to the
people. Proposed by English philosopher Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan, social contract
theory is a fundamental theory that supports constitutional governments, because

2
constitutions are a form of social contract. The people agree to give government certain
powers in exchange for other considerations.

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was the United States’ first constitution.
Created by the Second Continental Congress on November 15, 1777, it created the first national
government for the United States. Like the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of
Confederation relied heavily on John Locke’s theory of natural rights and very limited
government roles. The Articles also gave our country its name, The United States of America.

Confederation is a form of government where smaller government units, in this case the states,
are the sovereign—or the highest level of authority. States empower the national government
to do very limited tasks while maintaining most of the control at the state level. This idea is
borrowed from Native Americans.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government’s size, power, and role was very
limited. The national government under this document was structured as follows:

• One branch of government—Congress.

• Equal representation from each state in Congress
• All laws must be passed with a super-majority
• Congress has the power to create a national currency, borrow money in the name of the
United States, declare war, raise an army, and establish relations with foreign countries

The Articles of Confederation is known more for its failures than its successes. Under the
Articles, the national government did not have:

• An executive branch
• A national judiciary
• The power to tax
• The power to compel states to obey national laws or contribute funding
• Any power that was not “expressly delegated” or specifically written in the Articles

This last point prevented the national government from having any minor legal tools necessary
to execute the specific powers and responsibilities that it was given.

Under the Articles, the national government lacked significant power and the states largely
failed to live up to their responsibilities in the system, like adequately funding the national
government for the payment of debt, etc. The nation suffered an economic depression and
significant disfunction.

Shays’ Rebellion was an uprising in western Massachusetts to protest economic conditions,

high taxes, and abusive debt and tax collections. Led by Revolutionary War veteran Daniel
Shays, it demonstrated the weakness of the national government under the Articles when the

3
Congress was unable to fund an army to put down the uprising. The result of this rebellion led
to calls for a constitutional convention to fix the national government.

The Constitution of the United States

In the aftermath of Shays’ Rebellion, a constitutional convention was called in the summer of
1787. The initial idea behind this convention was to fix the Articles of Confederation. This idea
was abandoned relatively quickly in favor of creating a whole new system of government. The
new government abandoned the system of Confederation in favor of a system of federalism,
where the national government and state governments would share powers but the national
government would have significantly more powers than under the Articles of Confederation.

The constitutional convention featured a series of proposals and compromises that allowed the
new government to be formed. The initial compromise was over representation. The Virginia
Plan, proposed by the large states, created a Congress with two houses—both based on
representation. The New Jersey Plan, proposed by the small states, created a Congress with
one house based on equal representation from each state.

Another compromise was reached between slaveholding and non-slaveholding states, known
as the Three-Fifths Compromise, in which free persons would be counted as a whole person
and slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person. In addition to this compromise on
slavery, non-slaveholding states also agreed not to regulate the slave trade prior to the year
1808.

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, created a bicameral, or
two-house legislature, with the House of Representatives being based on population and the
Senate being based on equal representation from each state.

Drawing on the ideas proposed by French political philosopher Charles Montesquieu, the
national government was separated into three branches: the executive branch, the legislative
branch, and the judicial branch. Each branch of government was given specific and unique
powers that could not be exercised by the other branches. This system is known as separation
of powers. The idea behind separation of powers is to use the structure of government to
control government and the officials within the government.

In addition to separation of powers, each branch of government was given certain powers over
the other branches. For example, Congress can impeach and remove officers of the executive
and judicial branches, the executive branch has the law enforcement power and commandd the
military, and the judicial branch has the power to interpret law and the Constitution. This
system is known as checks and balances.

The Constitution of the United States relies heavily on the concept of republicanism and much
less on the idea of participatory or popular democracy. Only the House of Representatives in

4
the legislative branch is directly elected by the people in the original version of the
Constitution. Senators were initially appointed by their state legislatures, and the President of
the United States was elected by the Electoral College (and still is to this day).

The Electoral College places a buffer between the people and the powerful position of
president of the United States. As originally designed, the Electoral College selects the
president and may or may not vote with how the people of their state voted. This is an element
of elite democracy. As it functions now, the people of the state vote on which slate of electors
to send to Washington, DC, to elect the president of the United States. The electors themselves
are chosen by their political parties, and in most cases vote for who won the popular vote in
their state. However, there can be “faithless electors” who vote for someone other than who
the people of their state chose.

The national government under the Constitution of the United States is one of enumerated and
implied powers. Enumerated powers are those powers specifically listed in the Constitution;
they are augmented by powers that are not specifically mentioned but implied in certain
phrases in the constitutional text. These implied powers serve as tools with which the national
government can execute the enumerated, or specifically listed, powers granted to it by the
Constitution. Unlike the Articles of Confederation, the powers of the national government need
not be specifically and minutely listed to exist. This system of enumerated and implied powers
still provides a limited government framework but allows the government to possess all the
tools it needs to function properly.

Constitutional Structure
The Constitution of the United States is separated into seven articles.

Article I

Article I created the Congress and legislative branch.

The House of Representatives is based on population, with the most populous state receiving
the greatest number of representatives. Each state is guaranteed at least one representative.
There are currently 435 seats in the House of Representatives.

A member of the House of Representatives must be at least 25 years of age, a citizen of the
United States, and reside within the state they represent. Members of the House of
Representatives are elected every two years by the people of their districts. This makes the
House of Representatives the closest part of government to the people, and therefore the most
subject to popular opinion and swings in public sentiment.

The Speaker of the House, a constitutionally defined position, is the most powerful person in
Congress. The Speaker leads the House of Representatives and is selected by its members. The

5
Speaker of the House need not be a member of the House, but is almost always a member and
the leader of the majority party.

The Census is also included in Article I of the Constitution. It requires the population be counted
at least every 10 years; from this count, representation is apportioned to each state based on
population. Since currently there are 435 members of the House, each member represents
approximately 700,000 people.

The House of Representatives has the power of impeachment, which is a formal charge of
wrongdoing against a member of the executive or judicial branches.

All bills raising taxes must originate in the House but can be amended by the Senate.

The United States Senate is comprised of two representatives from each state, initially selected
by state legislatures but now elected by the people of the states after passage of the
Seventeenth Amendment. Senators serve terms of six years. The Senate is divided into three
classes, so that one-third of the Senate is up for election every two years. To serve as senator,
one must be at least 30 years of age, a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the state
they represent.

The Vice President of the United States presides over the Senate, but has no vote unless the
Senate ties in a vote.

The Senate tries all impeachments by the house. When the impeachment is of the president of
the United States, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over the trial.

The powers of Congress are enumerated in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. Among these
are the powers to:

• tax
• regulate commerce
• regulate immigration
• coin money and regulate the value thereof
• create the post office
• create patents
• create all courts below the Supreme Court
• declare war
• create the army
• create the navy
• directly govern Washington, DC
• make all laws necessary and proper to execute their enumerated powers

6
Article II

Article II created the executive branch and the presidency.

The president and vice president are elected to terms of 4 years. These positions are elected by
the Electoral College. Electoral votes are assigned to each state by adding the number of
representatives apportioned to the state plus the two senators.

To be president a person must be a natural born citizen of the United States and at least 35
years of age. Before entering office, the president must take an oath that is prescribed by the
Constitution. The president is commander in chief of the army and Navy and the state militias
when called in the service of the United States. They have the power to create treaties, which
then must be ratified by a two-thirds vote in the Senate.

The president has the power to appoint officials to the executive branch and to the judicial
branch, but those appointments must be confirmed by the Senate.

Except in cases of impeachment, the president has the power to pardon convictions of federal
law and commute sentences. The president, vice president, and all members of the executive
and judicial branches can be impeached for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and
misdemeanors. If convicted by the Senate, Article II says they shall be removed from office.

The president is required to give Congress an update on the state of the union from time to
time. This can be done in writing or in person.

Article III

Article III created the judicial branch and the Supreme Court.

There are 93 District Courts, 13 Circuit Court of Appeals, and one Supreme Court of the United
States, which consists of eight Associate Justices and one Chief Justice.

The Supreme Court and lower courts created by Congress are empowered with “judicial
power.” In the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, this judicial power was interpreted as
the power of judicial review, meaning only the courts have the power to interpret law and the
constitution.

Persons appointed to the federal judiciary are appointed for lifetime terms.

The Supreme Court of the United States has both original an appellate jurisdiction, meaning
certain cases involving states ambassadors and executive branch officials can be theoretically
taken to the Supreme Court directly under original jurisdiction, although most cases make their
way to the court under appeal or appellate jurisdiction.

7
Article III, Section 3 specifically defines the only crime defined by the Constitution. Treason is
specifically defined.

Article IV

Article IV expanded on the idea of federalism, noting what states owe to each other and what
the national government owes to the states.

It borrows language from the Articles of Confederation, and states that full faith and credit
public records, acts, and judicial proceedings of each state shall be respected by the other
states.

Article IV guarantees that the citizens of the United States shall be entitled to all privileges and
immunities of citizens in every state.

It describes the process for admitting new states to the union, but prohibits the formation of a
new state by using part of a current state or combining two states, unless approved by both
state legislatures in the Congress. It also states that the United States shall guarantee to each
state a republican form of government.

Article V

Article V provided two methods for amending the Constitution, through bills passed by two-
thirds of each house of Congress or by convention of the states.

The Constitution can be amended by a two-thirds vote of each house of Congress, and then
ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures. The Constitution can also be amended by two-
thirds of state legislatures petitioning to create a constitutional convention. All amendments
proposed by the constitutional convention must then be ratified by three-fourths the state
legislatures

Article VI

Article VI guaranteed the debt of the United States that was taken on under the articles of
Confederation. Section 2 of Article VI states that the constitution, federal law, and treaties shall
be the “supreme law of the land.” This means that the Constitution and federal law supersede
state law and state constitutions, when federal laws are being exercised appropriately.

Article VII

Article VII of the Constitution set forth the ratification process for the constitution. It initially
required that 9 of 13 states ratify the Constitution for it to take effect.

8
Ratification Campaign
After the constitution was drafted, a campaign to ratify it began in the states. Those in favor of
ratification were known as Federalists. Those opposed to ratification were known as Anti-
Federalists.

Federalists Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay authored a series of articles
explaining the structure and function of the government under the proposed Constitution.
These articles, published in pro-ratification papers at the time, are known as The Federalist
Papers.

In Federalist #10, Madison described how a republican form of government combined with
separation of powers can control government and the officials operating the government. The
proposed government was separated in such a way that no one branch and no one person in
government can obtain enough power to become despotic. Madison describes the control of
factions. He stated that factions can be controlled because they're either a minority, and
therefore too small to become despotic, or they are limited by the structure of government and
therefore unable to obtain all the power they need to become despotic.

In Federalist #78, Alexander Hamilton described the function and structure of the judicial
branch. He explains why the judicial branch is the least threatening to the rights of the people.
He stated that the judicial branch has neither the power of the sword nor the purse—it only has
judgment.

Anti-Federalists also published a series of articles under the name Brutus. These articles warned
that the proposed new national government was too powerful and too far removed from the
people. Brutus preferred that government power be kept in the states and closer to the people.
This theory, that the lowest level of government capable of performing a task should be the one
to perform a task, is called subsidiarity.

Practice Foundations of American Democracy Questions

Use this excerpt from James Madison’s Federalist #10 to answer the questions that follow.

Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous
citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and
personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good
is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often
decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor
party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.
However anxiously we may wish that these complaints had no foundation,
the evidence, of known facts will not permit us to deny that they are in some
degree true.

9
Madison's argument in Federalists No. 10 reflects

A. the fear of abuses of power by a representative government based on regional interests.

B. debates over the merits of inclusion of a bill of rights.
C. the idea that the will of the public is greater than the rule of the few.
D. supporters of the Constitution's fears that political factions would corrupt the new republic.

Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Supporters of the Constitution, including Madison, believed its checks
and balances would actually protect against corruption of political parties. Choice A is incorrect
because Madison’s argument is focused on factions and political parties, not regional interests.
Choice B is incorrect because the inclusion of a bill of rights was debated in regards to the
powers associated with the Constitution, not the factions that influenced it. Choice C is
incorrect because Madison’s argument highlights the strain between an emphasis on wide-
ranging participation in politics by the people and that of activism by factions, and he believes
factions (or parties) could overrule the public will.

How would the new Constitution protect against the fears that are summarized in the excerpt,
according to Madison?

A. By creating a series of checks and balances

B. Election of highly qualified and intellectual men
C. Adherence to term limits for all representatives
D. Allowing for state governments to veto any federal legislation

Explanation:
The correct answer is A. By separating powers between the branches of government,
supporters of the Constitution argued it would protect against corruption. Madison makes no
mention of the character or intellect of the men elected, and while he may have later
supported the ideas of nullification, states do not have the ability to veto federal laws. Term
limits could assist in protecting against abuses of power over time but would not be effective
between branches of government or within said term.

Which of the following would the opponents of Madison's argument in the excerpt most
support?

A. The First Amendment

B. The Fourth Amendment
C. The Fifth Amendment
D. The Tenth Amendment

10
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Opponents would support a Bill of Rights, specifically the Tenth
Amendment’s delegation of powers to the State and people, would protect against abuses of
power by individuals under the Constitution. The freedom of speech, protection against
unreasonable searches, and application of due process, while being supported by opponents,
would not be evidence to counter Madison’s argument on balance of power

11
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Around 13–18% of the questions on your AP exam will cover Civil Liberties and Civil Rights.

The first ten amendments to the Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights.

These amendments were made to the Constitution during the First Continental Congress as a
political compromise between Federalists and some Anti-Federalists. Because the original
Constitution did not make any mention of specific rights held by the people, some leaders felt it
important that certain rights be enumerated and protected in the document.

The First Amendment protects multiple rights including the free exercise of religion, freedom of
speech, freedom of the press, freedom of petition, and freedom of assembly. In addition, the
First Amendment also contains the Establishment Clause, which created the separation of
church and state.

The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment guarantees the right to follow the religion of
your choice. While the freedom to believe is absolute, the Supreme Court says actions can be
regulated. How far the government may go toward regulating the practice of religion is subject
to debate.

In the case Wisconsin v. Yoder in 1972, the Supreme Court found that for the government to
limit the free exercise of religion, it must prove that it is pursuing a compelling government
interest in doing so by the least restrictive means. This standard, also known as strict scrutiny,
places the burden of proof on government and significantly expands the right of free exercise of
religion.

In the case Lemon v Kurtzman in 1972, the Supreme Court found that for the government in a
religious institution to interact, they must pass the “Lemon Test.” For a law to be constitutional
under this test it must have a secular legislative purpose, not inhibit or advance religion, and
must not create excessive entanglement between church and state.

In the case Engel v. Vitale in 1962, the Supreme Court found that school sponsored prayer in
public schools violated the Establishment Clause.

Though the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech, this is not an absolute freedom
and some restrictions can be placed on speech by the government. There are two categories of
restrictions on the freedom of speech.

• Time, place, and manner restrictions limit how the freedom of speech is exercised, but
not what is said. Examples of this are noise ordinances, march or rally permits, and
limits on where protests can take place in the interest of public safety.

12
• Content restrictions on free speech attempt to limit the substance of what is being said.

In Schenk v United States in 1919, the Supreme Court found that speech that presents a “clear
and present danger” can be prohibited by the government. The example presented in this case
is that you cannot shout “fire” in a crowded theater. The freedom of speech has since been
expanded by the courts.

In Tinker v. Des Moines in 1969, the Supreme Court found that expressive acts, including
wearing of arm bands in protest, were protected by the First Amendment, including when such
actions are taken by public school students. While public school students do not enjoy a full set
of rights as an adult would, the court says that they do not surrender their rights at the
schoolhouse door.

In recent cases before the Supreme Court, the court has attempted to balance the right of free
speech with the government’s responsibility to keep good order. This balancing is done on a
case-by-case basis.

The freedom of the press is also protected by the First Amendment.

In the case of Near v Minnesota, The Supreme Court prohibited “prior restraint” of the press,
or what we would commonly call censorship. The only exceptions to this are issues dealing with
national security and wartime.

Even when the government claims that something is a national security matter, courts proceed
with a heavy assumption against prior restraint/censorship, as noted in the case New York
Times v. United States in 1971.

The Second Amendment protects citizens’ rights to keep and bear arms. The Second
Amendment has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to be an individual right, unrelated to
service in a state militia/National Guard.

In District of Columbia v Heller in 2008, the Supreme Court found that a generalized ban on
handguns violated the Second Amendment and our individual right to keep and bear arms.

In McDonald v. Chicago in 2010, the Supreme Court applied the Second Amendment to state
and local laws, therefore protecting the individual right to keep and bear arms at the state
level.

The Fourth Amendment protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures and
generally requires that searches by the government be done with a warrant based upon
probable cause. The Supreme Court has allowed certain exceptions to the Fourth Amendment.

The Fourteenth Amendment is a lengthy amendment that was passed during the Civil War. It
defines citizenship, protects the right of due process, and guarantees equal protection under

13
the law. In addition to these protections, the Fourteenth Amendment has been used to apply
the Bill of Rights to the states. This means that the Bill of Rights applies to all levels of
government—not just the federal government. Applying the Bill of Rights to the states through
the Fourteenth Amendment is known as Selective Incorporation Doctrine.

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects citizens from arbitrary
government action. The right of due process has also been used to support the right to privacy,
an unenumerated right held by the people, and to expand other rights. For example, in Gideon
v. Wainwright in 1963, the Supreme Court found that defendants have a right to a lawyer
under the Due Process Clause.

The right to privacy is a right that touches on many areas of law including government searches,
personal relationships, abortion, healthcare, and Internet usage. It can be summarized as “the
right to be left alone.”

In Roe v. Wade in 1973, the Supreme Court determined that the right to privacy extended to a
woman's choice to end a pregnancy. In what’s known as the trimester scheme, the Supreme
Court balanced government power and the right to privacy based on when in the pregnancy a
woman wanted to have an abortion. In the first trimester a woman has an absolute right to
privacy. In the second trimester the government has only the power to regulate safety of
medical procedures. In the third trimester government can prohibit abortion, except when the
life and health of a mother are at stake.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment generally protects citizens from
unequal treatment under the law. Perfectly equal treatment under law is not possible in all
cases, so the courts look at why people are being treated differently. Unequal treatment based
on race is viewed as being highly suspicious, even when the government's goal is a positive one.

In Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas in 1954, the Supreme Court ruled that
racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional, regardless of whether or not the schools
are equal in quality. The Supreme Court overruled itself in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896),
determining that segregation based on race is unconstitutional in public education. The
precedent in this case was used to rule racial segregation in official government policy
unconstitutional in all cases.

Even when the government is pursuing a positive goal, like diversity in college admissions or
government hiring, known as affirmative action, race cannot be a primary factor in deciding to
admit or who to hire. In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme
Court found that affirmative action policies designed to diversify college admissions were
permissible under the Fourteenth Amendment; however, race could not be the primary factor
and deciding who to admit.

Civil rights and equal treatment were extended to the private sector through multiple civil
rights legislation, the most important being the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This law prohibits

14
discrimination based on race and other factors in public accommodations, which are generally
defined as businesses that are open to the general public. Businesses cannot refuse to serve or
employ people based on the protected classes in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits discrimination in voting, banning practices such as
literacy tests. Originally the law placed states, counties, and smaller jurisdictions with a history
of egregious voting rights violations under “pre-clearance,” meaning they needed permission
from the Department of Justice to change their voting laws. This provision is currently not in
effect.

Practice Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Questions

Which of the following is an accurate comparison of the two court cases?

Brown v. Board (1954) Roe v. Wade (1973)

Declared school segregation
A. Declared abortion unconstitutional
unconstitutional
B. Cited the 14th Amendment in its holding Cited the 14th Amendment in its holding
Led to an increase in power for state Led to an increase in power for state
C.
government government
Cited the Bill of Rights as protection Cited the Bill of Rights as protection against
D.
against segregation restrictive interference

Explanation:
The correct answer is B. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was cited
in both holdings as reason for desegregation of schools and allowing women the right to an
abortion. Choice A is incorrect because the ruling in Roe v. Wade did not find abortion to be
unconstitutional. Choice C is incorrect because state power did not increase as a result of either
of these rulings; instead, federal law overruled the states. Choice D is incorrect because the
Equal Protection Clause was cited, not the Bill of Rights.

Which of the following cases is most similar to Engel v. Vitale (1962) in its use of the First
Amendment?

A. Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

B. Schenck v. United States (1919)
C. New York Times Co v. United States (1971)
D. Roe v. Wade (1973)

15
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Both Engel v. Vitale and Wisconsin v. Yoder utilized the First
Amendment to interpret religious practice. Choice B is incorrect because while both cases
interpreted the First Amendment, Schenck v. United States was focused on symbolic speech
and not religious practice. Choice C is incorrect because New York Times Co v. United States
focused on strengthening freedom of the press, not on religious practice. Choice D is incorrect
because Roe v. Wade interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment, not the First Amendment.

Which of the following would be an example of an individual liberty that is considered as part of
the Second Amendment?

A. Public safety
B. Freedom of speech
C. Due process
D. Equal protection

Explanation:
The correct answer is A. The issue of public safety and individual rights is the primary area of
debate when discussing the Second Amendment regarding regulation of firearms. Freedom of
speech is protected by the First Amendment; due process and equal protection are debated as
part of the Fourteenth Amendment.

16
Interactions Between Branches of
Government
A large portion of your AP exam, anywhere from 25‒36% of questions, will cover Interactions
Between Branches of Government.

Federalism
Government power in the United States is divided between the federal government and state
governments. This dividing of power is known as federalism. Different views exist on how this
power should be specifically divided.

Dual federalism, also known as “layer cake” federalism, states that state power and federal
government power and responsibility should be strictly divided and no sharing of power or
responsibility should be undertaken. Dual federalism, also known as “states’ rights,” attempts
to give most power and responsibility to state governments. The advantages of dual federalism
are that it allows states to experiment with policy and be more specific with that policy, and
that power is closest to the people. The disadvantages of dual federalism are that states do not
have jurisdiction to deal with problems that cross state lines or national borders, and state
governments often lack the resources to deal with policy problems, especially in times of
disaster and emergency.

Cooperative federalism, also known as “marble cake” federalism, states that the federal
government and state governments should share power and responsibility. Cooperative
federalism often gives more power to Congress and the national government, and prefers that
policy is made at the national level. The advantages of cooperative federalism are that the
federal government has jurisdiction throughout the entire country; has massive resources to
deal with policy problems, emergencies, and natural disasters; and can provide citizens with
multiple access points to government and policy makers. The disadvantages of cooperative
federalism are that Congress often makes policy that is not specific enough or tailored to
unique problems occurring regionally or in states, and that experimenting with policy at the
national level can lead to side effects that affect the entire nation.

The Supreme Court has taken different views on federalism throughout the history of the
United States.

In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not
interfere when Congress legitimately exercised its powers. In addition, this case also confirmed
that implied powers existed in the Constitution, meaning that not every power held by
Congress needed to be specifically listed in the Constitution.

17
In the latter twentieth century, The Supreme Court defined limits on congressional and national
government power. In the case of Lopez v. United States, the court ruled that the commerce
power was not an unlimited power and that activities regulated under this power must have
some relation to interstate commerce. This recognized that state sovereignty and local control
did exist and has a place in law.

Policy Making
Policy making in Congress is done mostly through the committee process. Committees are
groups of policy makers within Congress who specialize in certain areas of policy. Committees
are further divided into subcommittees that deal with very specific areas of policy.

Congress has both standing and select committees. Standing committees are permanent
committees to concentrate on certain areas of policy. Select committees are temporary
committees that are provided with specific tasks and then disbanded when those tasks are
complete. However, in the last several years select committees have taken on a more
permanent presence in both houses of Congress.

When new legislation is proposed it is assigned to the appropriate committee and

subcommittee by congressional leaders, and the committees begin investigating and gathering
evidence about the proposed policy.

Legislation can be altered, or amended, multiple times in the committee. When the committee
is done creating new legislation, it then votes on the legislation. If the legislation receives
sufficient support in the committee, then the legislation is moved on to the larger legislative
body—either the House or the Senate. While under consideration in the larger body, the
legislation can be further amended before being voted on for final passage. Once a bill is
approved by the House, it is then sent on to the Senate, to go through the Senate's legislative
process. The Senate can alter the bill or past the House’s version. All bills must contain the
exact same language before they can be forwarded to the president for his signature. The final
version of the bill is then sent to the president for his signature or veto.

If the House and Senate version of a bill is different, those differences are worked out in
Conference Committee, a temporary committee comprised of both House and Senate
members who work out language differences in a bill. Once the common language is agreed to,
the conference committee disbands.

Two theories exist about how a representative should come to voting decisions. A
representative can follow the delegate model, which says that representatives should vote with
the will of the people of the district. Under the delegate model, representatives should not
exercise independent judgment when voting on a policy and should strictly follow the majority
opinion of the districts they represent. A representative may also follow the trustee model of
representation. The trustee model of representation says that a representative is in the best

18
position to have an informed opinion on a policy issue and therefore should use their best
judgment when voting for the districts they represent. Individuals elected under this
understanding of representation are trusted by the public to use their best judgment to do
what is right for the citizens they represent.

Congress may choose to allow the executive branch to hire policy area experts to create rules
and regulations and specific areas of policy. Congress delegates its authority on occasion
because multiple scientifically based and technical rules may be needed to regulate an industry
or address a complex policy issue, and Congress members do not have the time nor expertise to
properly create the needed policy.

When Congress delegates its authority to the executive branch it must do so using “an
intelligible principle,” or framework, that the executive branch agency must operate within.
Congress can withdraw this delegated authority at any time, or it may remove funding from the
executive agency at any time. Congress may not create a veto process to approve executive
rules created under the delegation of authority prior to them going into effect. This is known as
a legislative veto, and it has been found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

Administrative Law
The rules created by the executive branch under the delegation of authority by Congress are
known as administrative law. Congress can create new independent agencies within the
executive branch to provide administrative rulemaking, policing, and regulation in certain areas
of policy. Independent agencies are led by presidential appointees who are confirmed by the
Senate, but after the confirmation are not subject to direct control by the president or the rest
of the executive branch. These independent agencies can be empowered with both quasi-
legislative and quasi-judicial functions.

• Quasi-legislative functions mimic the legislative branch, meaning that the independent
agency can create new rules and regulations within its policy areas.
• Quasi-judicial functions mimic the judiciary. This means that the independent agency
can decide if an individual or organization operating under its authority has acted
inappropriately and provide a punishment or corrective action.

In recent years, there has been a troubling trend of industry leaders being appointed to
government independent oversight agencies and then providing favorable oversight,
rulemaking, and regulatory decisions for the industry. This trend of industry controlling the
agencies that oversee them is called bureaucratic capture.

19
The Presidency
The president is the leader of the executive branch and is involved in both domestic and foreign
policy creation. The presidency is the most powerful position in the United States government.
There are two theories on how the president can choose to exercise his power.

The literalist doctrine states that a president has only those powers specifically mentioned in
the Constitution’s Article II. Therefore, the president should not exercise any power that he is
not specifically granted. This view of the presidency gives only limited power to the president
and the executive branch and has generally not been followed by any president since the
1920s.

The stewardship doctrine allows the president to exercise power in multiple areas and in
multiple ways. This theory says that unless the constitution specifically prohibits a president
from a certain action, then the president is free to exercise that power. The stewardship
doctrine significantly increases the power of the presidency and allows the president to exert
influence in nearly every area of public policy.

The unitary executive theory is a controversial view that provides the presidency and the
executive branch with nearly unlimited power. This theory states that the president has total
authority within the executive branch to create rules and policies as he or she sees fit.

The president has the most power in the area of foreign policy. As commander in chief of the
military, the president can deploy the armed forces and oversee their function as he or she sees
fit. The president also has the power to create relationships with foreign countries and their
leaders, and negotiate treaties and executive agreements.

Executive agreements are agreements between a president's administration and other

countries or international organizations. Unlike treaties, executive agreements do not have to
be ratified by the Senate, but they may also end when the president's term in office ends.

The president has the power to prioritize certain issues and policies within existing law. The
president can also prioritize federal law enforcement policy to pursue the political agenda he or
she prefers.

The president also has the power of the bully pulpit, which is the ability of the president to
command media coverage and focus the public's attention on issues he or she wishes to
prioritize. By focusing the public's attention and advocating for certain solutions, the president
can influence the legislative branch into producing policy that he or she favors.

The Executive Office of the President (EOP), also known as the “West Wing” of the White
House, contains all those employees who work directly for the president and help operate the
administration. This office contains the Vice President, White House Chief of Staff,

20
Communications Office, National Security Council, Office of Management and Budget, and eight
other offices that assist in policy making and execution from the White House. In total,
approximately 2,400 people work for the EOP.

The President of the United States also oversees the rest of the Executive Branch, including all
the cabinets and agencies of the federal bureaucracy.

Tension Between Branches of the Federal Government

The constitutional design of the United States government guarantees tension between the
executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Because no one branch has all the powers it needs
to operate, the three branches of government are codependent on each other to make the
government function effectively and efficiently.

For example, Congress is given the power to create legislation and the budget of the United
States government, also known as the “power of the purse.” The executive branch and the
presidency manage the day-to-day operations of the government agencies and budgets created
by Congress. The president traditionally creates a budget proposal, which he presents to
Congress, but Congress is not bound to honor that budget.

Congress creates the final budget for the federal government, including mandatory and
discretionary spending, and the executive branch manages its many departments within the
budget created by Congress.

Laws are created by Congress, but the president has the power to veto proposed legislation.
Congress can override the president's veto by a two-thirds vote of each house. While the
constitution declares that the president shall take care to faithfully execute the laws, the
president and the executive branch can prioritize the laws and policies they favor.

Only Congress has the power to declare war, but the president is commander in chief of the
armed forces. The president may deploy the armed forces as he or she sees fit, but the funding
of the armed forces is under the power of Congress. Congress also creates laws governing the
discipline and organization of the military.

Both the legislative and executive branches are subject to review through lawsuits by the
judicial branch. The judicial branch may declare laws passed by Congress, administrative laws,
executive branch actions, and state actions or laws as unconstitutional and therefore void. The
judicial branch also has the power to interpret statutes and the Constitution and settle what
the law is when statutes are in conflict.

The judicial branch cannot fund itself, enforce its own rulings, or create new courts. It is
dependent on the legislative and executive branches for these actions.

21
Bureaucracy
A government bureaucracy is an agency devoted to carrying out the policies of the government
consistent with the laws passed by Congress.

Cabinet departments are large organizations within the executive branch that bring together
agencies with similar missions to coordinate their activities and provide executive oversight.
These departments are created via legislation from Congress. Examples include the Department
of Defense, Department of State, Department of Justice, and Department of the Treasury.

Each cabinet department is led by a secretary who is nominated by the president and then
confirmed by the Senate. In addition to the secretary, the upper leadership of all the cabinet
departments are subject to Senate confirmation.

Below these political appointees are the everyday workers employed by the federal
government to perform the government's duties. This is known as the civil service. Civil service
employees are not political appointees and do not change when a new president enters office.
Civil service employees obtain their positions through merit hiring procedures. Civil service
hiring in the federal government began with the Pendleton Act in the 1880s and was adopted
to end the corruption plaguing the political hiring process that preceded it. The practice of
hiring all government employees based upon political loyalties and favors is known as the spoils
system.

Practice Interactions Between Branches of Government Questions

Which of the following pairs of statements is accurate with regards to the U.S. House of
Representatives and Senate?

House of Representatives Senate

A. Members elected every two years Members elected every six years
Can try impeachment of a Is empowered to call for impeachment of a
B.
president president
C. Can pass legislation Must pass legislation in order for it to become law
D. Can approve treaty ratification Can discharge petitions

Explanation:
The correct answer is C. The Senate must vote and approve legislation passed by the House
before it can become law. The president must also agree, but he or she can be overturned.
Choice A is incorrect because while senators are elected for six-year terms, elections are held

22
every two years in an attempt to stagger terms. Choice B is incorrect because the House can call
for impeachment proceedings, while the Senate will try impeachment. Choice D is incorrect
because the Senate can ratify treaties, while the House can discharge petitions.

Which of the following best describes why a caucus in the Senate could change every two years
even though senators are elected every six years?

A. Senators rotate between committees every two years.

B. Senators' terms are staggered.
C. Alliances are fragile due to special interest groups.
D. Members of the House of Representatives are elected every two years.

Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Terms are staggered so that about one third of Congress is up for
election every two years. There is no rotation system in place. Choice C is incorrect because
while this could be considered true, it does not directly address why coalitions could change
every two years; this reason could account for changes in less or more time. Choice D is
incorrect because it is not related to the question about the Senate specifically.

Which of the following was generally true of the balance of political power in the United States
throughout the twentieth century?

A. State governments grew stronger while the federal government lost influence.
B. The executive branch grew in strength and influence relative to the other branches of
government.
C. The Supreme Court's powers of judicial review were used less and less as the century
progressed.
D. Congress’s ability to amend the Constitution rendered the Supreme Court mostly irrelevant.

Explanation:
The correct answer is B. In the twentieth century, the dominant feature of the federal
government of the United States was the increasing power of the executive branch. For
example, in response to the Depression, F.D.R. wielded immense power over the other
branches. During the 1960s, presidents were granted broad emergency powers that
circumvented traditional checks on their powers. This trend of granting the executive greater
and greater freedom of action has continued into this new century.

Choice A is incorrect because though the power of state governments was still relatively strong
after the Civil War, the dominant trend has been toward a stronger central federal government.
This was especially true after the civil rights movement. Choice C is incorrect because as the
century progressed, the Supreme Court heard more cases, not fewer. The power of judicial
review is still an essential part of the balance of power in the U.S. government. Choice D is

23
incorrect because Congress can amend the Constitution, but the process is so difficult and
involved that amendments to the Constitution are fairly rare. Consequently, while the Congress
does have this check on the Supreme Court, it rarely uses it to override a decision.

24
Political Participation
Anywhere from 20–27% of the questions on your exam will cover the topic of Political
Participation.

Voting
Voting is the fundamental way that citizens can participate in government. Voting was not
clearly defined in the original Constitution but voting protections have been added through
amendments over the course of American history.

• The Fifteenth Amendment prohibits discrimination in voting based on race, color, or

previous condition of slavery.
• The Seventeenth Amendment changes the selection of senators from appointment by
state legislatures to election by citizens of each state.
• The Nineteenth Amendment guarantees women the right to vote in all states.
• The Twenty-Third Amendment provides Washington, DC, residents with 3 electoral
votes for president.
• The Twenty-Fourth Amendment bans the use of poll taxes in all states.
• The Twenty-Sixth Amendment lowered the voting age from 21 to 18 years old.

The Supreme Court has also taken steps through their cases to protect voting rights and
equality in voting.

In the case of Baker v. Carr in 1962, The Supreme Court declared that redistricting, or the
drawing of legislative districts, be done based on equal population in each district. This means
that each representative represents roughly the same number of constituents. This case creates
the famous “one person, one vote” rule.

Voters select their candidates based on different reasons. Some states and smaller jurisdictions
allow party-line voting. This means a voter may mark their ballot in one place and vote for all
candidates of one party. Many voters use this as a shortcut to determine their voting
preferences when they are unfamiliar with candidates in certain races. Voters using a rational
choice selection vote based on which candidate will be best for their individual interests. They
may also make their choices based on a candidate's history in office, or how a candidate has
performed in the past. This is known as retrospective voting. Prospective voting is making a
candidate selection based on how a voter thinks the candidate will perform in the future.

Certain groups in the United States are more likely to vote than other groups. Education,
income, race, ethnicity, religious affiliation, and age are all factors used in determining who is
likely to vote. Individuals who earn a higher income, college educated individuals, senior

25
citizens, and those who are religiously affiliated tend to be more likely to vote. Racial and ethnic
minorities, lower income individuals, and 18 to 29-year-old voters tend to vote less often.

Voter turnout also depends on individual issues in an election such as condition of the
economy, international crisis, and social issues. These issues may drive different demographic
groups to vote in higher numbers from election to election. Generally, the United States has
lower voter turnout than some other countries based on several factors, including voting being
mandatory in some countries.

Elections
The power to administer elections is divided between the federal government and state
governments. Election dates for federal offices are either constitutionally defined or set by
statute from Congress. State election dates are set by the legislature in each state.

Voter registration is also divided between the federal and state governments. Voter registration
is done state by state, with state governments having significant input on registration activities,
but the federal government also provides voter registration forms that must be accepted by the
states.

State and local governments establish and operate polling sites and early voting, but these
operations must be done in compliance with federal and constitutional civil rights laws.

• Congressional and presidential elections are held on the first Tuesday after the first
Monday in November. For the sake of efficiency and cost, most states also elect their
legislatures and state offices on these days; however, there are exceptions to this. These
are also known as general elections.
• Primary elections, or elections where members of a political party select their
candidates, are set on a state-by-state basis and operate according to state laws in
concert with the respective political party rules.
• Closed primaries are elections only open to registered members of the political party.
• Open primaries are elections open to any voter who wants to vote on the ballot of that
party.
• Caucuses are used in some states to select presidential candidates. They require voters
to attend a meeting on election night at their local voting location and pledge their
support for a candidate. It is a longer process than a primary election, and multiple
rounds of pledging may be required.
• Mid-term elections are held when the president is not on the ballot—in other words
when the president is in the middle of his or her four-year term. These elections tend to
have lower voter participation than presidential elections, sometimes with significantly
less participation.

26
Determining who wins an election is done on a state-by-state basis. For example, in some states
candidates may win with a plurality of votes, meaning they only need one more vote than other
candidates to win. In other states, candidates are required to receive a majority of the votes. If
no candidate receives a majority, runoff elections are held between the top two finishers.

Ballot design and technology is done on a state-by-state or even a county-by-county basis.

Multiple ballot designs may be present in any given state—some jurisdictions may use paper
ballots, while other jurisdictions will use voting computers or punch cards.

Political Parties
Political parties are official organizations designed to bring like-minded people together in
order to elect members of the party. Political parties play a role in organizing government,
operating elections, educating voters, and increasing voter turnout. These political party
contributions to our system are called party in the electorate, party in government, and party
as organization.

Party in the Electorate

Political parties in the electorate help to educate voters on issues, update voters on upcoming
elections and their rules, register voters, and turn out voters on election day.

Political parties formed early in American history but have changed over time. The United
States has a two-party system largely because of the single member district nature of our
legislative branches at the federal and state levels combined with the plurality winner elections
used by multiple states. When these conditions are present in most countries around the world,
we find a two-party system. Since the 1850s our two major political parties have been the
Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

Although they have remained the same in name, the voters and groups who make up the
parties has changed over time. The different people, interests, and groups affiliated with a
political party is called the party coalition. Political party coalitions can be based on economic
interests, social issues, religious affiliation, geographic location, political ideology, racial
makeup, and ethnicity among other factors.

Voters may choose to affiliate or identify with a political party based on a number of reasons.
Historically, political party affiliation was strongly correlated with family preference and social
group, meaning that if your family and social circle are Democrats or Republicans you would
also likely be a Democrat or Republican. Family and social party identification leads people to
identify with the party first, and then with how they feel on individual issues as a secondary
consideration. More recently, however, evidence indicates that a person's views on individual
issues drives them to vote for one party or the other. So, a person’s view on economic matters,

27
social issues, and international relations will lead them to vote for one party or the other, but
perhaps not identify as a Democrat or Republican.

Parties hold conventions, or gatherings of selected delegates, at both the state and national
levels. National conventions occur every four years during the presidential election cycle. These
conventional formalize the selection of the presidential and vice-presidential candidate for each
party. Prior to the 1970s, presidential candidates were actually selected at the conventions with
little primary election or caucus input.

Third parties, or minor parties, exist in the United States in abundance. While their electoral
success is limited, they can play a significant role in the success of the two major parties and the
issues the two major parties emphasize. Minor parties are usually organized around a singular
issue or a small set of related issues that motivates the targeted constituency. Historically,
when a minor party gains a significant enough following, one of the two major parties will
adopt the issues motivating the minor party as part of the major party’s platform. This allows
the major parties to broaden their coalition and add more voters during elections.

Party in Government
Political parties help to organize government. In the legislative branch political parties form
caucuses, which in theory help the legislature run more effectively. These caucuses prioritize
legislation and issues and appoint legislative leadership. Membership on committees,
committee leadership, and overall legislative leadership are determined by parties, often
through seniority.

Party as Organization
Political parties have a formal organizational structure and leadership. Parties gather
information, collect resources, promote issues, and recruit candidates for office at all levels.
Political parties help candidates with financial and informational resources and provide support
during campaigns and while governing. Party organizations exist at the local, state, and federal
level.

Collecting data and technology for political campaigns has become a highly important function
for political parties, especially at the national level. Both major parties have developed
sophisticated voter and election data that can be used by candidates at all levels to efficiently
and effectively communicate with voters and increase voter participation in elections.

Campaign Finance Regulation

Political parties at the national and state levels raise significant funds to support candidates in
their parties. Candidates are also responsible for fundraising within their individual campaigns.

28
Both political party fundraising and candidate fundraising are regulated by the state and federal
government, depending on what office the candidate and political party are running for.

At the federal level, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulates campaign finance and
disclosure. The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) created the FEC and campaign finance
rules for federal candidates. Political fundraising at the federal level has contribution limits and
public disclosure requirements that are enforced by the FEC. Candidates and political parties
must abide by these rules or face civil and even criminal punishments for violations.

Other organizations may also participate in federal and state elections—organizations wishing
to contribute directly to candidate campaigns are known as political action committees (PACs),
which are also regulated by the FEC. Organizations wishing to advertise through television,
radio, mail, and via the Internet who do not wish to contribute directly to candidates may also
spend money on elections. These organizations, known as independent expenditure
organizations, or more commonly referred to as Super PACs, face only disclosure requirements
from the FEC. They are allowed to accept unlimited funding.

In Buckley v. Valeo in 1976, the Supreme Court determined that how we spend money in
elections is a form of expression and therefore protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First
Amendment. The court allowed contribution limits to stay in place but struck down spending
limits.

In Citizens United v. FEC in 2010, the Supreme Court extended this free speech protection to
corporate entities wishing to run independent advertisements during elections. The result of
this case has increased election spending in the United States significantly.

Interest Groups
An interest group is an organization or group of individuals or entities who seek to influence
politics, government, and policy but are not a political party. Interest groups are formed around
specific areas of policy and seek to influence government in ways that are of benefit to their
group. Businesses usually organize into interest groups centered around the type of businesses
they’re in (banking, pharmaceuticals, energy, etc.). Citizens can also form interest groups to
promote the issues they care about.

Pluralism theory suggests that interest groups overall have a positive effect on government,
and states that there are interest groups representing all areas of society and all sides of any
given issue. This universal representation of all sides helps create balanced policy by giving
every group input on the formation of policy.

Elitism theory suggests that interest groups may not provide universal representation on all
issues. Even if groups exist on both sides, some groups have much more power and influence

29
than others. These “elite” groups will rise to the top and dominate the policy process,
producing policy that is unbalanced and strongly favoring the strongest interest groups.

Interest groups attempt to influence policy and government officials using three primary tools:
lobbying, campaign finance, and grassroots.

Lobbying is the act of talking directly to policy makers and building relationships with them in
order to influence policy. Thousands of interest groups and their lobbyists work in Washington,
DC, every day. Lobbyists can also provide draft legislation to lawmakers.

Interest groups can also influence government by helping to elect or re-elect lawmakers who
are favorable to their issues via financial donations to political campaigns. One legal way for
interest groups to donate directly to candidates is a PAC, which as mentioned, is a legal
organization regulated by the FEC that is allowed to donate limited amounts directly to
candidates and political parties but is subject to both disclosure and donation limits.

Interest groups can also influence government through grassroots efforts, which refers to
actions taken to affect public opinion on an issue. Rather than speak to the elected official
directly, grassroots efforts attempt to influence an elected official by changing the opinion of
those who vote for them. By manipulating public opinion around an issue, interest groups can
encourage an elected official to side with them or risk angering the voters who elect them. The
rise of social media has made grassroots organizing much easier, especially for small
organizations who do not have the money or influence of larger organizations.

Practice Political Participation Questions

Change in reported time of voting decision (%) 2000 2004

Knew all along how they would vote 12 33
Decided before or during the conventions 42 37
Decided after the conventions, during the campaign 24 15
Decided within two weeks of the election 18 13
Decided on Election Day 5 2
Not ascertained <1 <1
Total # 1,092 800

According to this table, most voters select their preferred presidential candidate

30
A. in the middle of the campaign.
B. on Election Day.
C. in the last two weeks of the campaign.
D. by the end of their party's convention.

Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Most voters have selected their preferred presidential candidate by
the end of their party's convention. In 2000, more than half of the voting population selected
their candidate by the end of the convention. In 2004, 70 percent of the voting population had
made up their minds before the presidential campaigns had officially begun. A majority of
Americans selected their preferred candidate earlier than the midpoint of the campaign. Very
few Americans decided which candidate to vote for on Election Day; in 2000, only five percent
selected a candidate on Election Day, and in 2004, only one percent were still undecided before
Election Day.

Which of the following factors is commonly linked with lower rates of political participation?

A. Owning a home instead of an apartment

B. Previously being involved in political activity
C. Being 30 or older
D. Having a high school degree only

Explanation:
The correct answer is D. There is a strong correlation between political noninvolvement and
low levels of education. Recent surveys have shown that less than 40 percent of citizens with a
high school education or lower voted in national or political elections. In contrast, more than 80
percent of people with advanced degrees voted. Home ownership often correlates with
political participation. Previous political involvement is also a strong indicator of future political
involvement; as political scientist Michael S. Lewis-Beck described it, "Voting... is an acquired
taste and the appetite grows with eating." Finally, older citizens tend to be more politically
active than their younger counterparts.

Which of the following strategies used by special interest groups for influencing policy would be
considered illegal?

A. Providing government officials with information

B. Making contributions to political campaigns
C. Directly contacting political leaders
D. Providing a commission for successful lobbying

31
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. Special interest groups are prohibited from providing gifts to
lawmakers and from providing a commission for successful lobbying. Choice A is incorrect
because one of the major ways special interest groups influence lawmakers is by providing
them with research and information that supports the views of the group. Choice B is incorrect
because special interest groups frequently make contributions to political campaigns. By
helping elect officials friendly to their causes, special interest groups hope to influence policy
making. Choice C is incorrect because through lobbyists and other means, special interest
groups frequently establish direct contact with politicians.

32
American Political Beliefs and Ideologies
Finally, 10–15% of your exam will cover the topic of American Political Beliefs and Ideologies.

Public Opinion
Public opinion, which can be defined as a collection of attitudes and preferences held by the
general public, is measured through public opinion polling. Polling is the scientific measure of
public opinion and is performed by collecting opinions from a randomly collected sample of
individuals who are representative of the larger group. While not perfect, public opinion polling
can provide a sense of where public opinion is at a given moment in time. Public opinion polls
take into consideration a number of factors when attempting to obtain a representative sample
of the population. Age, gender, race, education, income group, and other factors can all affect
the outcome of a poll.

• Benchmark polls take a snapshot of the public opinion at any given time. These polls are
often used to determine public feelings on certain issues and about certain candidates.
They are usually performed over a 3–4-day period.
• Tracking polls are done continuously over a given period of time to measure how public
opinion is changing from day to day, week to week, month to month, or even year to
year.
• Polls are often done on Election Day at polling places in highly important precincts to let
political campaigns and the media know how election is going in real time.
• Entrance polls ask voters how they intend to vote prior to their entering their polling
places.
• Exit polls ask voters how they voted once the voter has left the voting place.

Polls have a margin of error that varies from poll to poll depending on the size of the sample
taken. If a poll has a margin of error of +/– 3%, then each number in the poll could be 3% more
or 3% less than the number. For example, if Candidate A polls at 46% and Candidate B polls at
40%, then Candidate A should be in the range of 43–49% and Candidate B should be in the
range of 37%–43%. Polling can be done by Internet, phone, or in person.

Focus groups gather people together who are representative of their communities to ask them
questions about certain subjects. From these group interviews, we can reasonably extrapolate
how the general public might feel about an issue.

Public opinion can be formed and manipulated in various ways. Media organizations and
political leaders, through the decisions they make in prioritizing issues, can prime public
opinion. Priming is the process through which certain issues are prioritized in the public's mind
over other issues. Media organizations and political leaders can also create a context for how

33
the public views a certain issue. Framing is the process of establishing context in which a
certain issue is understood by the public.

Public opinion is also affected by an individual’s predisposition towards any given issue. Bias
refers to the preconceived ideas and feelings that the individual brings to an issue before being
presented with new information on the issue. Confirmation bias is a common bias where an
individual seeks out or interprets new information to confirm what they already believe to be
true. Individuals attempt to reconcile conflicting information in their own minds. When
presented with new information that conflicts with a previously held bias, individuals will often
attempt to rationalize their previously held positions and dismiss the new information.
Availability bias is a form of confirmation bias where readily available examples of something
are mistaken for being more representative than they are (anecdotal evidence versus empirical
evidence).

The discomfort felt by individuals in being presented with information that conflicts with their
previously held beliefs is known as cognitive dissonance. This phenomenon has presented
special challenges to the political world with the rise of social media, partisan news channels,
and the multiple online news outlets available to the public. It is now possible for people to
choose the news they want to hear, rather than being confronted with information that
conflicts with their previously held beliefs. Since 24-hour news channels combine news
reporting with opinion-based programming, it is sometimes difficult for the public to determine
which is factually-based news and which is opinion-based editorializing.

Public opinion can shape public policy, but public opinion can also be shaped by public policy.
Issue orientation is how the public feels about a given issue (support/oppose/no opinion). Issue
intensity is how strongly the public feels about a given issue (highly important/not
important/no opinion). Prioritization is the order of importance the public gives to political
policies. If the public feels strongly about a policy, elected leaders can react to that strong
public sentiment by creating policies that will please the public. If the public does not feel
strongly one way or the other about a policy or lacks sufficient information to have an opinion
on a policy, elected leaders can create a policy and then rally public support behind it.

Correlation is the relationship between two items—items that are closely related or occur
frequently together can be said to have strong correlation. However, correlation is not
causation. Because two phenomena occur frequently together does not necessarily mean that
one causes the other to occur.

Ideology
Ideology refers to a set of ideas or values the voters and individuals may identify with based on
how they feel about a wide variety of issues and their general attitude toward the role of
government. In the United States, ideology is broadly divided into liberal and conservative.

34
Liberals tend to favor government action, especially at the federal level, in regulating the
economy and providing necessities for those who need it. Examples of liberal programs include
Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, and unemployment benefits. Liberals tend to favor
individual freedom on social issues, preferring less government involvement in private lives and
a broader freedom of speech, association, etc.

Conservatives tend to favor less government involvement in the economy, preferring free
market forces to dictate prices, wages, recession, and expansion. Conservatives tend to favor
more government involvement in social issues. Regulating abortion, upholding moral standards
based on majority religious views, and regulating speech to keep good order are issue stances
generally preferred by conservatives.

In American politics, the Democratic Party tends to be the more liberal party while the
Republican Party (often referred to as the Grand Old Party, or GOP) tends to be the more
conservative party. Note: the definitions of liberal and conservative have different meanings
outside of the United States, so be careful not to confuse the American and international
definitions of these terms.

American voters can use party labels as a heuristic, or mental shortcut, to determine how they
will vote when they are not familiar with certain candidates in certain races. Because they know
the Democratic Party tends to be more liberal and the Republican Party tends to be more
conservative, they can reasonably assume the candidates running under these party labels at
least somewhat agree with the party's ideology, although moderates in both parties are neither
purely liberal or purely conservative.

Practice American Political Beliefs and Ideologies Questions

Use the excerpt below to answer the two questions that follow.

When Keynes wrote his great work The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money
during the Great Depression of the 1930s, he pointed out that during the Depression, the
capacity of the economy to supply goods and services had not changed much. U.S.
unemployment rates soared higher than 20% from 1933 to 1935, but the number of possible
workers had not increased or decreased much. Factories were closed and shuttered, but
machinery and equipment had not disappeared. Technologies that had been invented in the
1920s were not un-invented and forgotten in the 1930s. Thus, Keynes argued that the Great
Depression—and many ordinary recessions as well—were not caused by a drop in the ability
of the economy to supply goods as measured by labor, physical capital, or technology. He
argued the economy often produced less than its full potential, not because it was
technically impossible to produce more with the existing workers and machines, but
because a lack of demand in the economy as a whole led to inadequate incentives for firms
to produce. In such cases, he argued, the level of GDP in the economy was not primarily
determined by the potential of what the economy could supply, but rather by the amount of
total demand.

35
Which of the following would be most likely to support the economic policy of Keynesian
economics?

A. Liberals
B. Conservatives
C. Libertarians
D. GOP members

Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Liberals believe in more government regulation of the market and
attempts to increase personal spending. Choice B is incorrect because conservatives believe in
fewer government regulations of economic markets. Choice C is incorrect because libertarians
believe in little to no regulation of the market. Choice D is incorrect because most members of
the GOP would be labeled as conservative and believe in fewer government regulations of the
market.

Which of the following statements is most consistent with the passage?

A. Increasing the money supply by lowering interest rates would improve the economy.
B. Decreasing the number of workers available for labor positions would create more demand
in the economy.
C. Government creation of a new market for produced goods would increase both the output
and demand.
D. Cutting taxes and lowering interest rates would create more opportunities for firms.

Explanation:
The correct answer is C. Government intervention by creating a new market, or demand, for
goods would increase both production and the economy while reducing the supply. Choice A is
incorrect because creating more inflation would not improve the economy but only shift the
problem while giving no guarantee of increased demand for products. Choice B is incorrect
because there is no viable way to decrease the number of available workers, and having less
labor does not create more demand for products. Choice D is incorrect because this would be
an opposing economic theory (supply side) that advocates for less government intervention
into the economy instead of more like Keynes supported.

36
Use the graph below to answer the two questions that follow.

Which of the following conclusions does the above graph support?

A. After 1998, fewer African Americans cast votes in presidential elections.

B. There has been an increase in the number of Southern Caucasian voters since 2000.
C. The Civil Rights Era effectively ended African American support of the Republican Party.
D. Southern Caucasians have always been strong supporters of the Republican Party.

Explanation:
The correct answer is C. After the 1960s, the level of the African American population that
identified as Republicans never rose past ten percent. The graph does not support the other
choices.

Which of the following is most likely to have the greatest impact on the results expressed by
the graph?

A. Understanding the party's platform so that a voter can make his or her decision based on the
issues.
B. Raising large amounts of campaign funds that would go toward more advertising in hopes of
swaying the voter.
C. Identifying religious beliefs of the candidate to allow a voter to better understand the
candidate's position.

37
D. Providing interest groups access to the candidate in hopes of persuading him or her toward
certain types of voters.

Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Voter choice is impacted by perceived and real platform goals and
management regarding issues important to said voter. Campaign funds would not be as
important to a voter as the platform and what a party stands for; religious beliefs would be
considered part of a party platform; and interest groups can influence a party’s agenda, but the
platform itself is what impacts the voter.

38