0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9K views

Molly Dennis HRO

Molly Dennis HRO

Uploaded by

inforumdocs
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9K views

Molly Dennis HRO

Molly Dennis HRO

Uploaded by

inforumdocs
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
2022.01 turmacen +18 eer" 10:15:55 STATE OF MINNESOTA 2-06'00' istrict court COUNTY OF OLMSTED THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT Court File No.: 55-CV-21-5592 In the Matter of: Case Type: Harassment Petitioner, STIPULATED HARASSMENT and RESTRAINING ORDER Molly QB Dennis, Respondent. rene ee febresented by i yc Respondent is self-represented The Court issued an Ex Parle Harassment Restraining Order on September 30, 2021. Respondent requested a hearing. The Respondent required ADA accommodations from the Court related to her Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Respondent acknowledged that her ADA accommodations were met in the courtroom. Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a full agreement. Both parties were sworn in and read the terms of the stipulated agreement several times, at the request of Respondent. Respondent also had a copy of the agreement Presented to her in writing. The parties stipulated to the terms of agreement which is set forth herein Based upon the agreement of the parties, and all the files and records herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: |. Respondent had reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard. The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter. Respondent agrees to the issuance of a Harassment Restraining Order and waives her right to hearing The Court makes no findings of harassment.Respondent shall not harass Petitioner also referred to herein as the “protected person.” 3. Respondent shall have no direct or indirect contact with Petitioner, including any visits to or phone calls to the protected person, contact via electronic means such as email or social networking sites, threats, or assaultive behavior toward the protected person, damaging or stealing property belonging to the protected person, breaking into and entering the protected person's residence, and/or taking pictures of the protected person without permission Respondent shall not contact the Petitioner through any third-party. Respondent is prohibited from being within et of Petitioner's home at NMI 5 rc minor child Respondent shares with QB When present at Petitioner's home, Respondent shall not: Honk her horn Drive on the lawn Yell out her window at or towards Petitioner or Communicate with the Petitioner through Respondent's minor children aecD 5._Respondent is prohibited from being at 6. When Petitioner is present for any outdoor events for Respondent's minor children, Respondent must stay at least 50 feet from Petitioner. 7. When Petitioner is present for any indoor events for Respondent's minor children, Respondent must stay at least 25 feet from Petitioner. The exception is birthday parties for Respondent's minor children, for which Respondent must stay at least 10 feet from the Petitioner. 8. __ Forany function Respondent attends as part of her duties as a city council Person, Respondent must stay at least 10 feet from Petitioner.9. _ Inthe event Petitioner and Respondent are present at Hy vee, Costco, or Target at the same time, Respondent must stay at least 25 feet from Petitioner. This provision applies only to these three locations. At any other store, restaurant, or other venue where both parties are present, Respondent shall vacate the area if Petitioner is present. 10. This Order shall be in effect against Respondent and for the protection of Petitioner until January 12, 2023, unless changed by a later court order. 11. The Court Administrator shall send a copy of this Order to the following law enforcement agency: Olmsted County Sheriff's Department and Rochester Police Department, which have authority over the residence of the Petitioner. Every police department and sheriff's office in the United States, including those affiliated with tribal and territorial lands is responsible for enforcing this Order under 18 U.S.C. § 2265 Full Faith and Credit of Protective Orders. 12, Respondent is restrained from harassing, stalking, of otherwise threatening the protected person, or engaging in other conduct that would place the protected person in reasonable fear of bodily injury to that person; and is prohibited from the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the protected person that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(B) and (C). * NOTICE . Any conduct by the Respondent in violation of the specific provisions provided in the "It Is Hereby Ordered" section above constitutes a violation of this Harassment Restraining Order. A police officer shall arrest the Respondent without warrant and take the Respondent to jail if the police officer believes the Respondent has violated this order and shall hold the Respondent in jail for at least 36 hours, excluding the day of arrest, Sundays, and legal holidays, unless the Respondent is released by a Judge or judicial officer. Violation of this Harassment Restraining Order may be treated as a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony. A misdemeanor violation may result in a sentence of up to 90 days in jail and/or fine of $1,000.00. Some repeat violations are gross misdemeanors that may result in a sentence of up to one year in jail and/or a $3,000.00 fine. Other violations are felonies that may result in a sentence of imprisonment for up to five years and/or a fine of $10,000.00. 3

You might also like