Scribd
Upload
18 views

Survery Instrument Valdiation Rating Scale

The document describes a survey instrument validation rating scale that asks raters to evaluate 13 criteria for validating a survey instrument on a scale of 1 to 5. The criteria cover topics like the relevance of survey items, clarity of wording, and cultural appropriateness of the instrument.

Uploaded by

panlubasanjanyury
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
18 views

Survery Instrument Valdiation Rating Scale

The document describes a survey instrument validation rating scale that asks raters to evaluate 13 criteria for validating a survey instrument on a scale of 1 to 5. The criteria cover topics like the relevance of survey items, clarity of wording, and cultural appropriateness of the instrument.

Uploaded by

panlubasanjanyury
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SURVEY INSTRUMENT VALIDATION RATING SCALE

Instruction: Please indicate your degree of agreement or disagreement on the statements


provided below by encircling the number which corresponds to your best judgment. The
statements were adapted from the criteria for evaluating survey questionnaire set forth by Good
and Scates (1972), definition of content validity given by Polit and Beck (2004) and Chavez and
Canino (2005) criteria for Cultural Equivalency Model for Translating and Adapting
Instruments.

1 – Strongly Disagree 2 – Disagree 3 – Undecided 4 – Agree 5 – Strongly Agree

Criteria
1. The items in the instrument are relevant to answer the objectives of
1 2 3 4 5
the study.
2. The items in the instrument can obtain depth to constructs being
1 2 3 4 5
measured.
3. The instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the construct
1 2 3 4 5
being measured.
4. The items and their alternatives are neither too narrow nor limited in
1 2 3 4 5
its content.
5. The items in the instrument are stated clearly. 1 2 3 4 5
6. The items on the instrument can elicit responses which are stable,
1 2 3 4 5
definite, consistent and not conflicting.
7. The terms adapted in the scale are culturally appropriate. 1 2 3 4 5

8. The layout or format of the instrument is technically sound. 1 2 3 4 5

9. The responses on the scale show a reasonable range of variation. 1 2 3 4 5


10. The scale is not too short or long enough that the participants will be
1 2 3 4 5
able to answer it within a given time.
11. The instrument is interesting such that participants will be induced to
1 2 3 4 5
respond to it and accomplish it fully.
12. The instrument as a whole could answer the basic purpose for which
1 2 3 4 5
it is designed.
13. The instrument as a whole is culturally acceptable when
1 2 3 4 5
administered among staff nurses in the Philippine setting.

Comments and Suggestions:

Signature over Printed Name

You might also like