Chapter 9 - PFRS 6 Sample Problems
Chapter 9 - PFRS 6 Sample Problems
An engineering study indicated that on January 1, 2017, 7,500,000 tons of limestone were available.
SOLUTION:
Change in Estimate:
STEP 1: Determine the CA of the wasting assets as at the beginning of the period of change
(LATEST CARRYING AMOUNT BEFORE THE CHANGE). This carrying amount shall be the
basis of the new estimate a.k.a. the “as if” new cost.
STEP 2: Apply the changes by depleting the carrying amount on STEP 1 using the revised
estimated number of reserves and/or residual value.
RECALL:
How to compute for Depletion?
ACTUAL Units Extracted during the Year: XX
MULTIPLY:
Depletion Rate:
PX
Depletion: P XX
Alternatively:
ORIGINAL Depletion Rate:
Acquisition cost: P 10,000,000
Residual value: (3,000,000) = P 0.70
Depletable amount P 7,000,000
Accumulated depletion-Jan. 1, 2017
(4,000.000 x.70) (2,800,000) NEW Depletion Rate:
Remaining depletion amount- Jan. 1, 2017 P 4,200,000 = P 0.56
2) Nicholas Company paid P1,000,000 to purchase land containing total estimated 160,000 tons of extractable
deposits.
The estimated value of the property after the mineral has been removed is P200,000.
Extraction activities began in 2017, and by the end of the year, 20,000 tons had been
recovered and sold.
In 2018, geological studies indicated that the total amount of mineral deposits had been underestimated by
25,000 tons. During 2018, 30,000 tons were extracted and 28,000 tons were sold.
=P5
Alternatively:
Cost P 1,000,000
Residual value (200,000)
Depletable amount P 800,000
Depletion in 2017
(20,000 x 5) (100,000)
Remaining depletable amount- January 1, 2018 P 700,000
Depletion rate in 2017
(800,000/ 160,000) 5
NOTE: You have to compute for the adjusted estimate of the mineral deposits.
CHAIN PROBLEM:
On July 1, 2017, Lincoln Company, a calendar year corporation, purchased the right to a mine. The total purchase
price was P16,400,000 of which P2,000,000 was allocable to the land.
Estimated reserves were 1,800,000 tons. The entity expected to extract and sell 25,000 tons per month.
The entity purchased new equipment on July 1, 2017 for P7,500,000. The equipment had a useful life of 8 years.
However, after all the resource is removed, the equipment would be of no use and could be sold for P300,000.
4) What amount should be recorded as depreciation of the mining equipment for 2017?
a. 450,000
b. 900,000
c. 600,000
d. 300,000
SOLUTION:
DEPLETION DEPRECIATION
- Applies to the Wasting Asset/ Natural Resource. - Applies to the PPE used in excavating
- “Tangible Development Costs”
=P8
UL of WA is computed as:
= 72 months 12 months
= 6 years
Equipment P 7,500,000
Residual value (300,000)
Depreciable amount P 7,200,000
= P4
P4
Depreciation for 2017 P 600,000
5) Hasley Company is involved in the exploration for mineral rights. During the current year, the entity incurred
the following expenditures:
Exploratory drilling for minerals on site 2,000,000
Roads and infrastructure to access exploration site 3,500,000
Expenditures relating to the subsequent 3,400,000
development of the resources
SHUTDOWN:
6) In 20x1, Apricot Co. purchased real estate containing copper for a total cost of P10,000,000.
Immovable tangible equipment costs for drilling rig foundation totaled
P5,000,000. Estimated recoverable reserves from the mine are 1,000,000 units. It
is estimated that 100,000 units will be extracted each year, therefore the life of the
mine in years is 10 years. The drilling rig has an estimated useful life of 15 years.
Actual units extracted from 20x1 through 20x3 totaled 340,000 units. No units were extracted during 20x4
due to an employee strike. Extraction resumed in 20x5 and total units extracted during that year was 80,000
units.
SOLUTION:
Recall:
In the problem: Production
20x1 - 20x3:
ACCOUNTING FOR SHUTDOWN SHUTDOW
During the period of Shutdown or Non-extraction: 20x4:
N
1. No depletion is charged.
2. Depreciation continues since the asset is still 20x5:
available for use. This is the accounting problem
in the periods of shutdown.
Own UL
SL Method
(UL of PPE)
The carrying amount of the immovable tangible equipment as of January 1, 20x4 is determined as follows:
= P5
The carrying amount of the immovable tangible equipment as of January 1, 20x5 is determined as follows:
Cost of Drilling Rig Foundation PThe AD on January 1, 20x5 is
5,000,000
Accumulated Depreciation computed as follows:
(1,975,000)
CA- Jan. 1, 20x5 P AD,
3,025,000
Jan. 1, 20x4 P
(340,000 units x 5) 1,700,000
Depreciation for
20x4 275,000
Depreciation for 20x5 using UNITS-OF-PRODUCTION Method is
computed as follows:
Depreciation Rate:
= P 4.58
Depletion Rate:
= P 4.58
P 4.58
Depreciation for 20x5: P 366,400