Flora and Fauna Discussion
Flora and Fauna Discussion
1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
To preserve, manage, develop, and conserve the biological resources of the Panilahan
Watershed, an assessment of the flora and fauna is necessary. The assessment result may
provide valuable insights for informing forthcoming proactive development and management
endeavors. An assessment was conducted on two ecosystems - the upland forest which are
located at Brgy. Liberty, Sherwood, Mahayahay and the mangrove forest in Brgy. Macabug,
Ormoc City, Leyte. For the upland forests, modified belt transect were used, a two- kilometer
baseline transect was established where calibrated ropes were utilized to construct 20m x
20m, 5m x 5m and 1m x 1m quadrats every 250m. while in the mangrove forest, Belt transect
was used as it is the most applicable sampling technique for mangroves with adjusted
intervals of 25 meters to maximize the narrow strips of mangrove along the shoreline.
following the guidelines in Technical Bulletin No. 16-A.
During the assessment, annual and perennial farming, kaingin, presence of the
invasive species, and other observable disturbances were recorded and provided with
additional information on the field data sheet. Local aides helped identify the species
encountered, especially the sound of the birds, while field guides were used to determine the
species in photographs captured throughout the assessment.
2.1.1 VEGETATION
The land cover of Panilahan Watershed consists of eight classes based on the 2020
land cover map. As observed, Perennial crop was the largest part of watershed covering a
total area of 913.91 hectares (24.63%), followed by a vast area of open forest with an area of
907.53 hectares (24.46%), brush/shrubs with 779.73 hectares (21.09%), Close forest with
and area of 632.33 hectares (17.04%), Annual crop covering 193.16 hectares (5.21%), Open
barren with an area of 130.49 hectares (3.52%), Inland water covering 62.67 hectares
(1.69%), Built up with an area of 46.19 hectares (1.24%) and lastly, the smallest part of the
watershed was the Grassland with a total area of 44.23 or 1.21% of the entire Panilahan
watershed.
Figure 33. Vegetation observed during the transect walk at the upland forest, inside
the Panilahan Watershed.
2.1.1.1 FORESTLAND
A. Floristic Composition
Using a modified belt-transect method with a quadrat measurement of 20 meters by
20 meters, the biological resources of the watershed were assessed. All trees measuring ten
(10) cm in diameter at breast height (DBH) were measured using the tree caliper while all
floristic composition within the quadrat was recorded and listed. A total of 120 flora species
identified and recorded which belongs to 62 families and 105 genera. There are 61 (51%) tree
species, 24 (20%) herbaceous, 12 (10%) ferns, 9 (7%) grasses, 10 (8%) shrubs, 2 (2%) of
rattan, and 2 (2%) species of weeds (See figure and Table).
Figure 34. Plant classification in percentage
Ferns 16
Herbaceous 13
Grass 25
Palm 8
Sedges 29
Tree 100
Principal sources of fuel, construction materials, and furniture are among the
identified plant species. Some of these are important for mitigating climate change (stream
flow regulation, soil erosion control, and air purification). Despite being categorized as non-
timber forest products, the recorded species make substantial contributions to
biodiversification and support the way of life of rural inhabitants. Furthermore, they provide
sustenance, shelter, and vital aromatic and medicinal attributes to many animal species.
Additionally, trees, especially native species, benefit the environment by providing shelter
and protection against soil erosion. In addition, they reduce the concentration of glasshouse
gasses in the atmosphere by storing carbon dioxide. Ancestral species comprise the legume
family, which is highly regarded for its ability to sequester nitrogen. Prominent for their
capacity as forages, the grasses include the Poaceae family.
Table 29 . List of identified common flora species in Panilahan Watershed
Conservation Status
Common Name Scientific Name Family Name Life form
IUCN 2022-2 DAO 2017-11
Mayapis Shorea palosapis Dipterocarpaceae Tree NT OWS
Ulayan Lithocarpus ilanosi Fagaceae Tree NE OWS
Tibig Ficus nota Moraceae Tree NE OWS
Nato Palaquium luzonense Sapotaceae Tree VU OWS
Piling liitan Canarium luzonicum Burseraceae Tree NT OWS
White lauan Shorea contorta Dipterocarpaceae Tree CR VU
Hambabalud Neonauclea formicaria Rubiaceae Tree LC OWS
Talisay gubat Terminalia foetidissima Combretaceae Tree LC OWS
Gapas-gapas Camptostemon philippinense Malvaceae Tree EN OWS
Lanigpa Toona ciliata Meliaceae Tree LC OWS
Sagisi Heterospathe elata Palmae Palm LC OWS
Katmon Dillenia philippinensis Dilleniaceae Tree NT OWS
Malasantol Dysoxylum arborescens Meliaceae Tree LC OWS
Malaikmo Celtis philippinensis Cannabaceae Tree LC OWS
Sagimsim Syzygium brevistylum Myrtaceae Tree DD OWS
Lanete Wrightia arborea Apocynaceae Herbaceous LC OWS
Spike pepper Piper aduncum Piperaceae Shrubs LC OWS
Bikal babui Dinochloa luconiae Poaceae NE OWS
Alagasi Leucosyke capitellata Urticacea Tree LC OWS
Bago Gnetum gnemun Gnetaceae Tree LC OWS
Hindang Myrica javanica Myricacea Tree NE OWS
Hindang laparan Myrica javanica Myricaceae Tree NE OWS
ile Ficus septica Moraceae Shrubs LC OWS
Pugahan Caryota cumingii Palmae/Arecaceae Palm DD OWS
Igyo Dysoxylum gaudichaudianum Meliacaceae Tree LC OWS
Molave Vitex parviflora Verbenaceae Tree VU EN
Anabiong Trema orientales Cannabaceae Tree DD OWS
Langka Artocarpus heterophylus Moraceae Tree LC OWS
Caimito Chrysophylum cainito Sapotaceae Grass DD OWS
Malapapaya Polyscias nodosa Araliaceae Herbaceous DD OWS
Antipolo Artocarpus blancoi Moraceae Tree CR VU
Ipil-ipil Leucaena leucocephala Fabaceae/Mimosoidae Grass LC OWS
Subiang Brideliana insulana Phylantaceae Tree NE OWS
Pakiling Ficus odorata Moraceae Tree NE OWS
Ilang-ilang Cananga odorata Annonaceae Tree NE OWS
Anie Erythrina spp. Euphorbiaceae Tree NE OWS
Malatibig Ficus congesta var. congesta Moraceae Tree NE OWS
Mangga Mangifera indica Anarcadiaceae Tree NE OWS
Butli Ficus gal Moraceae Tree NE OWS
Alim Melanolepis multiglandulosa Euphorbiaceae Tree LC OWS
Amamali Leea aculeate Leeaceae Shrubs NE OWS
Hagimit Ficus minahassae Moraceae Tree LC OWS
Bakan Litsea philippinensis Lauraceae Tree NE OWS
Libas Spondias pinnata Anarcadiaceae Tree NE OWS
Lanzones Lansium domesticum Meliaceae Tree NE OWS
Niog niogan Ficus pseudopalma Moracea Herbaceus PE OWS
Narra Pterocarpus indicus Fabaceae Tree EN OWS
Banitlong Cleistanthus pilosus Euphorbiaceae Tree EN OWS
Sarat Screlia scrobiculata Cyperaceae Grass DD OWS
Banban Donnax cannaeformis Marathaceae Shrubs DD OWS
Kulape Rattan DD OWS
Lokdo-lokdo Nephrolepis hirsutula Dryopteridaceae Fern DD OWS
Wild gabi Colocasia eculenta Araceae Herbaceous DD OWS
Banana Musa sapientum Musaceae Herbaceous DD OWS
Step ladder Costus speciosus Costaceae Herbaceous DD OWS
Spiderwort Commelina diffusa Urticaceae Grass DD OWS
Nito Lygodium circinnatum Rubiaceae Fern LC OWS
Spike moss Selaginella spp. Thelypteridaceae Fern DD OWS
Fern Diplazium esculentum Athyriaceae Tree DD OWS
Duguan Myristica philippinensis Myristicaceae Tree PE OWS
Ituman Garcinia ituman Clusiaceae/Guttiferae Tree DD OWS
Tibig Ficus nota Moraceae Tree LC OWS
Torch-ginger Etlingera elatior Zingiberaceae Herbaceous DD OWS
Tubang-usa Costus speciosus Cannaceae Herbaceous DD OWS
Ulayan Lithocarpus ilanosi Fagaceae Tree DD OWS
Wild ginger Zingiber zerumbet Zingiberaceae Weeds DD OWS
Yellow Adler Turnera ulmifolia Passifloraceae Weeds LC OWS
Note: EX – Extinct; EW - Extinct In The Wild; CR - Critically Endangered; EN – Endangered; VU – Vulnerable; LR/cd - Lower Risk: Conservation Dependent; NT or LR/nt - Near Threatened;
LC or LR/lc - Least Concern;DD - Data Deficient; NA – Not Applicable
B. Conservation Status
The classification of the 120 identified species' conservation status following the DAO
2017-11 "Updated National List of Threatened Philippine Plants and Their Categories" and
the red list 2022-2 of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) is presented
in Tables 2 and 3.
Following the IUCN 2022-2, two (2) species categorized as endangered – Vitex
parviflora and Pterocarpus indicus, three (3) vulnerable species -Shorea contorta, Palaqium
luzoniense one (1) near Threatened - Musa textilis, 49 species are least-concerns, and seven
(7) species classified as data deficient, whereas there was one (1) species recorded listed in
DAO 2017-11 as endangered – Vitex parviflora, Pterocarpus indicus and Nephelium
lappaceum categorized as vulnerable species, while Koordersiodendron pinnatum listed as
other threatened species.
Various plant species are threatened by human activities such as deforestation and land
conversion. Preserving their habitats, restricting their overexploitation, and educating the
local populace are all vital conservation measures that must be implemented to prevent the
extinction of these species.
Following the FMB (2019) guidelines, all trees with DBH greater than ten (10) cm were
measured, marked, and identified down to the species level (see figure 4). Measurement was
carried out using a tree caliper and a diameter tape 1.3 meters above the ground. Relative
densities, frequencies, and dominance for each species were then calculated. Numerical
descriptions of abundance and density use a number per unit of area. The abundance of other
species as a function of time and space is relative to relative density. It is simply said that
frequency is the number of times a species occurs. To demonstrate dominance, basal area or,
occasionally, volume was used.
Further, the relative frequency, density, and dominance values are added together to get
the species importance value. The rank linkages between species are established using these
recognized criteria in forest ecology. The formulas used are as follows:
Relative Density = density for a species / total density for all species x 100
Frequency = number of plots in which species occur / total number of plots sampled
Relative Frequencies = frequency value for a species / total frequency for all species x
100
Basal Area = π / 4 (diameter at breast height in cm2)2
Dominance = basal area or volume for a species / area sampled in hectares
Relative Dominance = dominance for a species / total dominance for all species x 100
Figure 35. Measuring the Diameter at Breast Height (left) and recording the
identification of the species (right)
There are a total of 189 individual trees measuring above 10 cm Diameter at Breast
Height (DBH) within the established eight (8) plots. By calculating the mean Species
Importance Value (SIV) of each tree in the sampling site within the watershed, the species
that were most prevalent and diverse were identified. Species importance values indicate the
abundance of a species in the watershed. The degree of influence a species has on its
watershed is inversely proportional to its relevance.
31. Species Importance Value (SIV) of tree species (measuring <10 cm DBH)
Species
Relative Relative Relative
Species Importance
Density Frequency Dominance Value
Alagasi 6.76
Alangas 8.11
Alim 5.41
Alingatong 4.05
Amamali 5.41
Anabiong 4.05
Anii 4.05
Anilau 2.70
Antipolo 2.70
Anubing 2.70
Arangen 2.70
Avocado 2.70
Bakan 2.70
Banai-banai 2.70
Binunga 1.35
Bitanghol 1.35
Butli 1.35
Cacao 1.35
Caimito 1.35
Dita 1.35
Duguan 1.35
Gapas-gapas 1.35
Guijo 1.35
Hagimit 1.35
Hambabalud 1.35
Hauili 1.35
Libas 1.35
Malaikmo 1.35
Malapapaya 1.35
Malasantol 1.35
Malatibig 1.35
Mangga 1.35
Mayapis 1.35
Molave 1.35
Narra 1.35
Nato 1.35
Pakiling 1.35 2.12 7.33
Piling liitan 1.35 5.19 11.57
Puso-puso 1.35
Putat 1.35
Sagimsim 1.35
Salngan 1.35
Subiang 1.35
Tabgon 1.35
Talisay gubat
Taluto 1.35
Tisa 1.35
Tibig 1.35
Tindalo 1.35
Ulayan 1.35
White lauan 1.35
Tree fern 1.35
Parasitic maiden 1.35
fern
Scaly swordfern 1.35
Agsam 1.35
Spike-moss 1.35
Nito 1.35
Nitong puti 1.35
Hagnaya 1.35
Pugahan 1.35
Rattan/limuran 1.35
Rattan/Palasan 1.35
Sagisi 1.35
Coconut 1.35
Makahiya 1.35
Wild gabi 1.35
Asyang 1.35
Pandanus 1.35
Wild banana 1.35
Step ladder 1.35
Alikbangon 1.35
Centrosema 1.35
Walis-walisan 1.35
Hagonoy 1.35
Malatabako 1.35
Dilang-aso 1.35
Damong tigas 1.35
Giant bamboo 1.35
Bikal-babui 1.35
Hagikhik 1.35
Agingay 1.35
Mutha 1.35
Sarat 1.35
The Shannon Diversity Index of the flora species, a tool to measure the diversity of
species in a community, was computed using the number of individuals of trees (>10cm
DBH). In an animal community, as Fernando et al. (1998) interpreted, values within 2.5 to
2.99 signify moderate diversity with 0 translating sameness in species number (see table
below). The higher the value of H, the higher the diversity of species in a particular
community. The lower the value of H, the lower the diversity. A value of H = 0 indicates a
community that only has one species.
H=[(pi)×ln(pi)] Where:
Hmax = ln(S)
Where:
S = total number of
species Entropy =
H / Hmax
The result of the H' value for the study area is 3.64, suggesting a considerable degree of
diversity, whereas H'max is 3.82, signifying an abundance of species. It provides evidence of
the presence of numerous tree species within the catchment. A valuable indicator of the
health and biodiversity of a watershed is the diversity index.
The comparison result is 0.95, which indicates the degree of uniformity in the
distribution of the different species. A value in proximity to 1 rather than 0 signifies that the
species distribution in the forest under investigation is nearly homogeneous. Consistently
conducting monitoring of these species and their habitat guarantees that they remain diverse.
The mangrove assessment in Brgy. Macabug Ormoc City, Leyte, was carried out
utilizing a Belt-transect methodology as it is the most applicable sampling techniques for
mangroves with a quadrat measure of 10 meters by 10 meters and other non-tree flora
(shrubs,vines, herbs, ferns) shall be identified and counted inside the 2m x 2m quadrat. Since
the area has narrow strips of mangroves along the shoreline, intervals between quadrats have
been adjusted to 25 meters and established a total of six (6) quadrats only. Seven (7) species
of Mangrove and mangrove associated plants were identified and recorded in the six (6)
established plots, which belong to six (6) families(refer to Table 33).
Each species was then classified based on the IUCN 2022-2. As seen in the table, 7 of
the 7 species recorded are classified as the least concern listed in the IUCN 2022-2. No
species of the recorded species listed in the DAO 2017-11.
Table 33. List of identified mangrove species including associate species and their conservation status
Conservation
Common Name Scientific Name Family Name Status
IUCN 2022-
2
Figure 36. Measuring the Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) and Total Hight (TH) of Mellitia
pinnata (left) and recording of the species identified (right).
The species significance value (SIV) was calculated using measurements of 117
individual trees, each measuring ten (10) centimeters in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Within the family Rhizophoraceae, Rhizophora mucronata, and Rhizophora apiculata have
the highest SIVs of 54.25 and 43.19, respectively, making them the most diversified and
dominant species. Following these with SIV values of 36.98, 33.19, and 30.25, respectively,
were Sonneratia alba, Avicennia officinalis, and Avicennia Marina. Since these species can
regenerate itself and is a pioneer, the plant is widely disseminated throughout the study area.
Because it grows quickly and is easily propagated, it is the preferred plantation species.
Table. 34. Species Importance Value (SIV) of tree species (measuring <10 cm DBH)
Species
Relati Relative Relative
Species Importa
ve Frequency Dominance
nce
Densi
Value
ty
Alagaw-dagat 12.30 12.50 8.39 33.19
Bakauan-bato 16.04 14.58 23.62 54.25
Bani 9.09 12.50 8.66 30.25
Miapi 8.02 10.42 7.19 25.63
Pagatpat 10.70 8.33 17.95 36.98
Talisay 9.63 8.33 9.83 27.79
Beach morning glory 8.56 6.25 3.89 18.69
Given that there are just thirteen species in the mangrove area, the abundance of
species achieved a value of 2.30. The Shannon Diversity Index (H'), computed using data
from 171 individuals, indicated a low diversity of mangrove species with a value of 2.23
following the standard. However, the comparison's outcome shows that the thirteen species
are equal—0.97, a value closer to 1 than 0, which denotes an even distribution of tree species
in the ecosystem. It implies that the ecosystem is more stable and resilient to shocks.
All the mangrove species found at the sampling site were thought to be widely spread
throughout all continents and nations, including the Philippines. The mangrove forest
provides a habitat and sanctuary for various species, including fish, birds, animals, insects,
and plants. More significantly, it acts as a natural defense against storm surges and waves,
reducing the negative consequences of flooding on both property and people.
2.1.2 FAUNA
Table 35. List of identified common fauna species found in Panilahan Watershed
Conservation
Status
Classificati Common Name Scientific Family IUCN 2022- DA
on Name Name 2 O
201
9-
09
White-eared brown dove Phapitreron Columbidae LC
leucotis
Orange-bellied Flowerpecker Dicaeum Dicaeidae LC
trigonostigma
Philippine Bulbul Hypsipetes Pycnonotidae LC
philippinus
Philippine hanging
Loriculus Psittacidae LC
parrot philippensis CR
Aves Yellow breasted fruit dove Ptilinopus Columbidae LC -
occipitalis
Philippine coucal Centropus viridis Cuculidae LC
Olive-backed Flowerpecker Prionochilus Dicaeidae LC
olivaceus
Balicassiao Dicrurus Dicruridae LC
balicassius
Rufous-tailed Flycatcher Myiarchus validus Tyrannidae LC
Coppersmith Barbet Psilopogon Megalaimidae LC
haemacephalus
Philippine coucal Centropus viridis Cuculidae LC
Short-tailed Drongo Dicrurus striatus Dicruridae LC
Green Citrus Locust Amata huebneri Acrididae
Common Green
Omocestus viridulus Acrididae
Grasshopper LC
Coccinella
Lady bug Coccinellidae
septempunctata
Leaf Beetle Monolepta sp. Chrysomelida
e
Leaf Beetle Ouiema sp. Chrysomelida
e
Common grass yellow
butterfly Eurema hecabe Pieridae LC
Meadow brown Maniola jurtina Nymphalidae LC
butterfly
Common evening
brown Melanitis leda Nymphalidae LC
butterfly
Cricket Creatonotos gangis Erebidae
Red-veined darter Sympetrum Libellulidae LC
fonscolombii
Common green darner Anax junius Aeshnidae LC
Melanoplus
Red-legged grasshopper femurrubrum Acrididae LC
Rufous grasshopper Gomphocerippus rufus Acrididae LC
Western honey bee Apis mellifera Apidae LC
Brown Hawker Aeshna grandis Aeshnidae LC
Common green frog Hylarana erythraea Ranidae LC
Reptilia American toad Bufo americanus Bufonidae LC
Emerald Tree Skink Lamprolepis Scincidae LC
smaragdina
Two-striped Telamonia Telamonia dimidiata Salticidae
Arachnida Giant Golden Nephila pilipes Nephilidae LC
Orbweaver
Spiny orb-weaver Gasteracantha kuhli Araneidae
spider
Rusty Millipede Trigoniulus corallinus Trigoniulidae
Diplopoda Flame-leg Millipede Trigoniulus Trigoniulidae
macropygus
Brown Millipede Ophyiulus pilosus Spirobolidae
Chilipoda Tropical Centipede Scolopendra sp. Scolopendrida
e
Actinopteryg Tank goby Glossogobius giuris Gobiidae LC
ii
Note: EX – Extinct; EW - Extinct In The Wild; CR - Critically Endangered; EN – Endangered; VU – Vulnerable; LR/cd -
Lower Risk: Conservation Dependent; NT or LR/nt - Near Threatened; LC or LR/lc - Least Concern; DD - Data Deficient;
NA - Not Applicable
B. Photo Documentation
Mist netting is an exceptionally effective technique for spotting avian and bat species in
flight. Mist nets generally consist of a perimeter of delicate lines designed to capture avian or
bat species in flight. In addition, this enormous barrier comprises infinitesimal compartments
referred to as "shelves," which are vital elements of the net within which the animal would be
trapped. Mist nets measuring 5 meters in height and 20 meters in width were placed where
fruit-bearing trees, including "hagimit," occurred. Observations or "Tibao" were performed
every two hours between 5:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Due to the nocturnal nature of bats, the mist
netting was erected during the night and inspected as early as 5:00 a.m. the following
morning. After removing from the nets, bats and birds were transferred to bird bags. Bats
were fed after their capture before their release into the wild.
Figure 40. Installation of mist nets (left) and releasing the trapped species (right)
Table 36. List of fauna species recorded through Photo Documentation method.
Conservatio No. of
Comm Scientific Fam n Status
Classificatio individu
n on Name ily
IUCN 2022- als
Name Nam
2 trapped
e
Bolbopsittacus
Guaiabero Psittaculidae LC 1
lunulatus
Aves
Collared Todiramphus
King Alcedinidae LC 2
chloris
Fisher
Note: EX – Extinct; EW - Extinct In The Wild; CR - Critically Endangered; EN – Endangered; VU – Vulnerable; LR/cd -
Lower Risk: Conservation Dependent; NT or LR/nt - Near Threatened; LC or LR/lc - Least Concern; DD - Data Deficient;
NA - Not Applicable
Figure 41. Species trapped in mist nets - Todiramphus chloris (left) and Bolbopsittacus lunulatus
(right)
C. Conservation Status and Diversity Index
Following the IUCN Red List 2022-2 and DAO 2019-09 criteria, the conservation
status of each of the 45 fauna species documented through transect walk and mist netting was
determined. DAO 2019-09 classifies as critically endangered only one species identified
through the transect method: the Philippine hanging parrot. However, IUCN 2022-2 classifies
this species as least concerning due to the extensive illicit exploitation that transpired. The
distinctiveness of this species' color has led to its exploitation by numerous illegal hunters,
who have sold or kept them as pets. Efforts should be undertaken to preserve this species,
including increased monitoring and enforcement and stricter hunting and trafficking
regulations. It is also necessary to implement awareness-raising campaigns regarding the
perils associated with the illegal exploitation of this species. Also, there are 33 species listed
in the IUCN 2022-2 as least concerns.
The diversity index was calculated utilizing data regarding the quantification of 379
individuals. The Shannon Diversity Index (H') for the faunal species in the study area is 3.69,
suggesting a flourishing ecosystem and an exceptionally high level of diversity. Conversely,
the species abundance in the watershed is 3.78, indicating the presence of numerous species.
The comparison results of 0.97 indicates that various species are equivalent. The result, closer
to 1 than 0, suggests that the species distribution in the sampled forest is relatively consistent.
Potentially, it could mitigate the risk of further population decline and eventual extinction of
these organisms. Constant monitoring is necessary to guarantee the safety of these species
and their habitats.
Cra
bs
5%
Gastropods
16%
Birds
42%
Bivalves
11%
Insects
16% Fishes
10%
Conservation Status
No. of
Classificatio Common Scientific Name Family Indivi
n Name Name IUCN duals
2022-2 trappe
d
Olive-backed
Cinnyris Nectariniidae LC 2
Sunbird jugularis
Aves
Golden-bellied Gerygone
Acanthizidae LC 1
Gerygone sulphurea
Note: EX – Extinct; EW - Extinct In The Wild; CR - Critically Endangered; EN – Endangered; VU – Vulnerable; LR/cd -
Lower Risk: Conservation Dependent; NT or LR/nt - Near Threatened; LC or LR/lc - Least Concern; DD - Data Deficient;
NA - Not Applicable
According to IUCN 2022-2, information regarding the conservation status of only
eleven of nineteen species is available; these species are classified as least concerns. DAO
2017-11, in contrast, does not contain any species listings.
The diversity index was computed using the same formula; the result for H' is 2.84,
which indicates a moderate diversity of faunal species in the mangrove forest of the
catchment, with birds comprising the majority; the result for species richness (H'max) is 2.89.
Given that the species distribution or entropy value is 0.98, closer to 1 than 0, the species
distribution along the watershed's coastline is nearly equal to or greater than 0
Figure 44. Golden-bellied Gerygone (left) and Olive-backed Sunbird (right) caught during
mist netting.