EIEXC2A WBL2 CS Learning Guide 2024-2
EIEXC2A WBL2 CS Learning Guide 2024-2
Compiled By KT NSHIMBA
Year 2024
NQF Level 5
Credits 16
1
CONTENTS
• Project Proposal…………………………………………………………………………5
• Appendix B Syllabus……………………………………………………………….. 17
2
REGISTRATION AND REPORT SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
CONTACT DETAILS
DEPARTMENT OFFICE E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE
Computer Systems Coordinator R005 [email protected] 0169507519
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
• It is the responsibility of the student to register for WBL before training commences.
• The student will simultaneously register for EIEXC1A, EIEXC2A and EIPRC4A, which are the three
components of the workplace-based learning.
• The registration, completion and submission of reports must be done according to the guidelines on
page 4.
• An accredited assessor, appointed by industry, will do the assessment of the project. This assessor
must have a qualification that is equal to or higher than the qualification being assessed.
• The student must do the training under the supervision of a mentor, which could also be the assessor if
the mentor has the necessary qualifications.
• A VUT accredited staff member will act as examiner.
• The assessor must complete page 6, the assessor’s declaration (page 9), as well as the assessment
report (page 8 to19).
• If the mentor or assessor needs any assistance feel free to contact the Computer Systems Coordinator
at VUT. (see top of page)
• To fulfil the requirements of the Diploma: Electrical Engineering: Computer Systems, the student must
successfully complete all academic requirements, as well as the three Workplace Based Learning
components.
• Graduate attribute 12 (GA12) is further developed in this module, but not evaluated.
3
Workplace Based Learning 2 (WBL) Registration
Registration procedure:
• This module should be registered at the same time with EIEXC1A and EIPRC4A.
• This project module carries a credit value of 16.
• The minimum required time, according to ECSA, is 240 hours for this module for a 6-month training
schedule, and 480 hours for a 12-month training schedule.
4
VAAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
WORKPLACE BASED LEARNING
COMPUTER SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
5
1 GENERAL INFORMATION – TRAINING SCHEDULE REPORT WBL (EIEXC2A)
STUDENT’S
STUDENT NUMBER:
POSTAL ADDRESS:
ID NUMBER:
E-MAIL:
QUALIFICATIONS:
6
2 TOPICS SCHEDULED FOR WBL 2 (EIEXC2A)
The following table shows the possible applicable topics that may be included by the company where
the workplace based learning takes place. Show the total hours for each topic.
The scheduled topics are on pages 10 to 18. Extra topics that the company may wish to include should
be added. The topics numbered 1 to 7 serves as a guide and may be modified by the company. Topics
will however need to be approved by VUT.
TOPIC TIME
CONTENT TOPICS
NUMBER HOURS
Cloud Computing:
1 Deployment of cloud-based resources, Deployment of web-based
systems
Design, Development & Implementation of Network
2 Infrastructure:
LAN, WAN, Cloud-based
3 Software and Databases Systems:
Development, commissioning, and maintenance.
4 IoT Systems:
Design & Prototyping, Configuration & deployment
Data management:
5 Backup systems, data security and protection, data management and
analysis
Server infrastructure:
6 Configuration & Deployment of servers (Linux or Windows), Using
automation software to deploy and manage remote servers
Hardware Design:
7 Design of hardware systems by making use microcontrollers, sensors
and actuators to solve engineering problems.
8 Other
9 Other
10 Other
TOTAL Hours /480
7
WBL SCHEDULE ACCEPTED BY VUT:
8
2 ASSESSOR DECLARATION – ASSESMENT REPORT WBL 2 (EIEXC2A)
ID NUMBER :
COMPANY :
E-MAIL:
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSOR
DECLARATION
I, the above-mentioned assessor, declare that the above-mentioned student has completed this workplace based
learning module (WBL) of the qualification in the mentioned period under my supervision.
The student was found competent in the outcomes as specified in the assessment report. I confirm that graduate
attribute 12 was further developed with the student in preparation for the evaluation in the project module.
Signature : Date:
SIGNATURE: DATE:
9
ASSESMENT REPORT AND TRAINING SCHEDULE WBL 2 (EIEXC2A)
SYLLABUS: COMPUTER SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
After completion of this topic the student should be able to do the following:
• Deploy cloud-based resources (e.g. VMs, VNETs, Storage etc)
• Deploy of web-based systems using containers (e.g. Docker & Kubernetes)
Date:
10
TOPIC 2 DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT & IMPLEMENTATION OF NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE
After completion of this topic the student should be able to do the following:
• Design networks for SOHO, medium and Enterprise setup.
• Design and deploy cloud-based networks
Assessor Signature: 1 2 3 4 5
Date:
11
After completion of this topic the student should be able to do the following:
• Design desktop and cloud-based application using popular programming languages and
frameworks.
• Design databases, both for on premises and cloud usage using popular database systems.
Assessor Signature: 1 2 3 4 5
Date:
12
After completion of this topic the student should be able to do the following:
• Design & Prototyping systems that make use of IoT technologies, e.g. smart monitoring, smart
farming, smart energy management systems, smart security etc.
Assessor Signature: 1 2 3 4 5
Date:
13
After completion of this topic the student should be able to:
• Devise solutions for data backup.
• Implement backup solutions for on premisses and cloud storage.
• Implement security mechanisms to protect data.
Assessor Signature: 1 2 3 4 5
Date:
14
TOPIC 6 SERVER INFRUSTRUCTURE
After completion of this topic the student should be able to demonstrate the ability to:
• Plan and deploy server infrastructure both on premisses and in the cloud.
• Deploy and configure of server operating systems (Linux and Windows)
• Use automation software to deploy and manage remote servers (Ansible, ARM templates,
Terraform etc)
Assessor Signature: 1 2 3 4 5
Date:
15
TOPIC 7 HARDWARE DESIGN
Assessor Signature: 1 2 3 4 5
Date:
16
TOPIC 8
After completion of this topic the student should be able to demonstrate the ability to:
•
Assessor Signature: 1 2 3 4 5
Date:
17
TOPIC 9
After completion of this topic the student should be able to do the following:
•
Assessor Signature: 1 2 3 4 5
Date:
18
TOPIC 10
After completion of this topic the student should be able to do the following:
Assessor Signature: 1 2 3 4 5
Date:
19
APENDIX A
ECSA requires that GA12 be evaluated at the end of the WIL training. This GA must be introduced to the student when starting with WBL1 module, developed
further in WBL 2 module, and evaluated in WBL 3 (project module). In this module, there is need for proof of how this GA was further developed.
Below are the descriptions of what this GA entails.
Learning outcome: Demonstrate an understanding of workplace practices to solve engineering problems consistent with academic learning
achieved.
• The balance of investigation and experiment should be appropriate to the discipline. An investigation or experimental study should be typical of
those in which the graduate would participate in an employment situation shortly after graduation.
Where is the outcome In the final Workplace project report.
assessed?
How is this outcome Students must submit a report, validated by a mentor, demonstrating their capability to:
assessed?
• Utilize computer engineering principles to develop, construct, and configure systems within the
workplace-based learning environment.
• Employ computer engineering principles for the design or enhancement of existing systems.
• Implement computer engineering principles to innovate or improve processes within the
20
workplace.
• Certainly! Here are additional points that build upon the initial requirements, showcasing a
comprehensive application of computer engineering principles in a workplace-based learning
setting:
• Analyse and evaluate the performance of implemented systems, employing computer engineering
principles to identify optimization opportunities and implement effective solutions.
• Apply critical thinking and problem-solving skills to troubleshoot and resolve technical issues that
arise during the development or operation of systems.
• Collaborate effectively with cross-functional teams, using computer engineering principles to
communicate technical concepts clearly and contribute to interdisciplinary projects.
• Demonstrate an understanding of industry standards and regulatory requirements relevant to
computer engineering, ensuring that all projects comply with these guidelines.
• Employ computer engineering principles to assess the security implications of systems and
processes, implementing robust security measures and protocols to protect organizational data.
• Integrate sustainability considerations into system design and development, applying computer
engineering principles to promote environmental responsibility and resource efficiency.
What is satisfactory The student must comply with conducting a proper investigation and experiment to uncover the required
performance?
information. The student should reflect the following in the report:
This graduate attribute is assessed by a comprehensive four (4) level rubric where a minimum set of
21
outcomes must be met to prove competency. The GA assessment is categorised as follow:
• Poor - student does not comply at all,
• Borderline - may comply with corrections,
• Competent - min to moderate compliance is met,
• exceed expectation – max compliance is met.
All objectives must be achieved with at least the foundational level of adherence as specified by the
assessment criteria. This involves a detailed evaluation of the necessity for the project. Computer engineering
students must comprehend the critical importance of experimental and project-based work, demonstrating
proficiency in planning and executing technology-driven projects. In particular, they are expected to:
1. Choose the most appropriate hardware and software tools for conducting research or experimental
projects, showcasing the ability to accurately select and utilize the necessary technology with
minimal mistakes.
2. Independently set up and conduct experiments or simulations using specified hardware and
software, requiring negligible assistance. They demonstrate a significant degree of autonomy in
navigating and employing complex computational tools and environments.
3. Analyse, interpret, and draw meaningful insights from data collected during the project. Perform
precise calculations or analyses with minor discrepancies.
4. They should also be capable of comparing experimental data with theoretical concepts,
acknowledging any discrepancies, measurement inaccuracies, and variables that could influence the
outcomes.
22
5. Formulate conclusions based on a thorough analysis of all gathered data. The conclusions should be
detailed in a coherent paragraph that encapsulates the project's findings, exhibits a logical flow, and
suggests avenues for future research or development.
6. Compile the project's objectives, methodology, and findings into a well-organized technical report.
Although the report might omit a few negligible details, it should largely reflect the attributes of a
comprehensive and professional document, including being properly bound.
What is the consequence Achieving this attribute is a critical requirement for successfully completing Workplace Based Learning. Non-
of compliance will result in failure, regardless of whether the aggregate score from all summative assessments is
unsatisfactory a pass. Students who do not satisfy one or more of the criteria will be afforded a second opportunity, within
performance? specified deadlines, to fulfil all requirements for the Graduate Attribute (GA). Should a student fail to meet all
criteria after this second chance, they will not pass the module, and their record will indicate 'Fail to meet GA
12'.
23
APENDIX B
WBL 2 - RUBRIC
This guideline can be used by the assessor to do student evaluation.
Evaluation guideline
Use of Skills
Rating
Very slow
1 Cannot use Has not and do not Does not get
Has little Cannot apply Never Does nothing unless
advanced integrated successfully along with
knowledge any theory accurate instructed
0-19% equipment any skills complete any staff
any tasks
Has Never
Can apply Can use Has to redo Can interact
2 Can recall integrated complete
some theory advanced and then positively Does just enough to keep
some basic some tasks
with equipment with sometimes with most of out of trouble
20-39% knowledge documented successfully
assistance assistance accurate the staff
skills on time
Has
Can use Just
Can apply the integrated Just meets Interact
3 Knows the advanced complete
basic the basic the minimum positively
basic equipment to tasks Does the minimum expect
minimum minimum specification with all the
40-59% minimum do the basic successfully
theory documented s staff
minimum on time
skills
24
Effectively Normally Is accepted
Work is
Can select and integrate complete all by the staff
4 always
Good Can apply high use advanced skills as tasks as somebody Normally looks for over
better than
knowledge level theory equipment needed in successfully with good and above work to do
60-79% minimum
independently practical before/on personal
expected
applications time skills
Innovatively
Always Uses
Optimally select integrate all
5 complete all Work is personality Ambitious and eager to
Excellent Can analyse and use theoretical
tasks always to positively prove talents beyond
knowledge and synthesize advanced and practical
80-100% successfully excellent. influence requirements
equipment skills to solve
before time other staff
problems
25