Use_of_Basic_Technological_Devices_and_S
Use_of_Basic_Technological_Devices_and_S
ABSTRACT: Technology has always flourished for the gain of mankind. Broadly speaking, all cellular phones, laptops and
computers belong to technological devices. Thus, students used these devices for learning. This quantitative inquiry investigated
the use of technological devices of students and its relationship to their academic performance. Hence, a researcher-made
questionnaire was utilized to answer the descriptive and inferential questions. It was found out that there is no significant
difference between the use of technological devices and the academic performance of students. But there was a significant
relationship found between the two variables. A recommendation on the use of both traditional method and use of
technological devices was made to augment and improve the learning needs of the students.
INTRODUCTION
Technological devices (TD) have been anticipated as beneficial tool for learning. In education, TD are rapidly adopted. These
devices were used often to schools without considering its effect on learning. Also, there is a limited understanding of values
and ways that these devices benefit learning and how to effectively use it in education. Thus, there is a need to construct a
digital ecology to have a cohesive learning experience (Yee, Quek, Chung, & Sawyer, 2012). Mobile learning is rapidly spreading
but the eventual consequence of it is not yet clear. It also becomes the most efficient way for instruction delivery. Thus, it is
necessary to examine its implication in teaching and learning (El-Hussein & Cronje, 2010) since previous studies have shown that
it helped students improve their learning (Halili, Nurul & Rafiza, 2018; Halili & Suguneswary, 2016; Halili & Hamidah, 2016;
Maryam & Halili, 2015).
In Singapore, there is an increase accessibility and availability of technological devices. Concerns from parents was
raised on the risks and benefits of the devices to young children since they have access to it daily. Children have been the
remote controlled by the devices which undermine their abilities to create learning (Ebbeck, Yim, Chan, & Go, 2016). Also, in
Tripura private schools, they provide learning environments to students. Their schools have well- trained teachers, laboratories,
and other equipment. But in their capital city (Agartala), the availability and usability of educational technology is not more
satisfactory (Biswas, 2014). Also, in Malaysia, they embrace the fourth industrial revolution to revamp the Malaysian education
system. They have digital integration in their everyday lives where they aligned themselves to machines to discover new theory
of innovation that made teaching and learning process dynamic (Ali, 2017).
The evolution of wireless technology and other devices has radically changed the social and economic lifestyle of the
people. These devices have reshaped people in different ways but only a few have regarded it for learning. Devices are primarily
popular because its wireless and portable. It enables users to communicate while on the move. Thus, it consequently added to
their ability for multiple level functions. Visionary educators should begin to consider the implications of these devices in
modern teaching and learning process. Thus e-learning will take place to those who are familiar with it. Emergence of
technology has significant impact in education. It eliminates the fixity of traditional classroom, and it does not have to be
confined in one place to be effective (El-Hussein & Cronje, 2010).
METHODS
A simple survey was utilized in this study. A descriptive- correlational research design is used to collect information to provide
answers of a particular study (Prieto, Naval and Carey, 2018). A sample of 84 out of 147 Humanities and Social Sciences Stand
students of Victorias National High School in Victorias City during the School Year 2018 – 2019 were taken as respondents of the
study utilizing the stratified random sampling (Monge & Perez, 2021). The respondents identified the technological devices they
used to augment learning and they were asked to give their academic grades based on their class report cards. Moreover, they
were classified according to variable of sex. Hence, their academic performance was categorized using the Department of
Education standards: Outstanding, Very Satisfactory, Satisfactory, Fairly- Satisfactory, and Did Not Meet Expectations.
A self-made survey-instrument was used in gathering data. It was further validated by jurors using the Good and Skates
validation form with a 4.50 validity index. The instrument includes the demographic data of students including their sex, and
academic grades for the school year. Hence, reliability testing follows (Monge & Perez, 2021) with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.864.
Therefore, the instrument used was both valid and reliable. The data were statistically analysed using a frequency count the
number of users of the technological devices and the academic performances of the students. Consequently, Mann- Whitney U
Test and Kruskal-Wallis was utilized to test if there is significant difference between use of technologies to their sex, and
academic performance. Lastly, Chi-square test was utilized to determine if there was a significant relationship on the use of
technological devices and their academic performance considering that the data are non- parametric.
The data also showed that there was no significant difference between the use of technological devices and sex of students.
Likewise, there was no significant difference on the use of technological devices and students’ academic performance. It is
understood that the variables are very independent that it does not affect one another. The data specification is presented
below.
TD
Mann-Whitney U 731.000
Wilcoxon W 1.082E3
Z -.437
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .662
a. Grouping Variable: Sex
Lastly, it was found out that the use of technological devices of students are significantly related to their academic
performance. Thus, the use of TD can improve the student’s academic performance knowing that all respondents have used TD
for learning. The date is shown below.
Table 6: Significant relationship between Technological Devices and Academic Performance
TD AcadPerf
a
Chi-Square 1.925E2 69.048a
df 3 3
Asymp. Sig. .000 .000
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 21.0.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The students used technological devices as a tool for their learning. But there was no significant difference between students’
sex and their use of technological devices. Additionally, students’ academic performance and their use of technological devices
do not affect to each other since there were no significant difference found. On the other hand, a significant relationship was
found on the student’s use of technological devices and their academic performance.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the study on the use of technological devices and students’ academic performance revealed that there was no
significant difference between students’ sex and their use of technological devices. Therefore, the sex has no effect on the use
of technological devices of students. Furthermore, the findings showed that there is a relationship between the use of
technological devices and students’ academic performance. This means that technological devices have an impact to the
academic performance of the students.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
All the glory and honour are offered to the almighty who were the source of strength of the researchers to continually explore
education as whole that would impact its practices. Also, to the Department of Education, Division of Negros Occidental,
Victorias National High School administration, teachers, and staff who is in one way or another became the support group of the
researchers to pursue this study.
REFERENCES
1) BISWAS, M. (2014). A Study on the Technological Devices used by English Teachers at the Secondary level in Private
Institutions in the capital city Agartala.
2) Ebbeck, M., Yim, H. Y. B., Chan, Y., & Goh, M. (2016). Singaporean parents’ views of their young children’s access and use
of technological devices. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(2), 127-134.
3) El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Journal of
Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12-21.
4) Halili, S. H. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-
Learning, 7(1), 63-69.
5) Yee, S. L. C. Y., Quek, F., Endert, A., Chung, H., & Sawyer, B. (2012, July). The physicality of technological devices in
education: building a digital experience for learning. In 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning
Technologies (pp. 579-581). IEEE.