Skip to content

Fix pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-disruptive #34186

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

carlory
Copy link
Member

@carlory carlory commented Jan 21, 2025

#31981 migrated sig-storage gce config jobs to the community cluster. It dropped the --stage= flag but forgot to drop the --extract=local flag. This PR removes the --extract=local flag. I learned it from #33276 and #33258 (comment)

This PR want to fix this issue:

2025/01/17 08:43:35 process.go:155: Step 'make -C /home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes quick-release' finished in 16m1.133187637s
2025/01/17 08:43:35 util.go:263: Flushing memory.
2025/01/17 08:43:40 process.go:96: Saved XML output to /logs/artifacts/junit_runner.xml.
2025/01/17 08:43:40 process.go:153: Running: bash -c . hack/lib/version.sh && KUBE_ROOT=. kube::version::get_version_vars && echo "${KUBE_GIT_VERSION-}"
2025/01/17 08:43:42 process.go:155: Step 'bash -c . hack/lib/version.sh && KUBE_ROOT=. kube::version::get_version_vars && echo "${KUBE_GIT_VERSION-}"' finished in 1.681961649s
2025/01/17 08:43:42 main.go:326: Something went wrong: failed to acquire k8s binaries: open /home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/gcs-stage: no such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/workspace/scenarios/kubernetes_e2e.py", line 391, in <module>
    main(parse_args())
  File "/workspace/scenarios/kubernetes_e2e.py", line 307, in main
    mode.start(runner_args)
  File "/workspace/scenarios/kubernetes_e2e.py", line 136, in start
    check_env(env, self.command, *args)
  File "/workspace/scenarios/kubernetes_e2e.py", line 57, in check_env
    subprocess.check_call(cmd, env=env)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/subprocess.py", line 413, in check_call
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '('kubetest', '--dump=/logs/artifacts', '--gcp-service-account=/etc/service-account/service-account.json', '--build=quick', '--up', '--down', '--test', '--provider=gce', '--cluster=bootstrap-e2e', '--gcp-network=bootstrap-e2e', '--extract=local', '--gcp-master-image=gci', '--gcp-node-image=gci', '--gcp-zone=us-west1-b', '--test_args=--ginkgo.focus=\\[sig-storage\\].*\\[Disruptive\\] --ginkgo.skip=\\[Driver:.gcepd\\]|\\[Flaky\\]|\\[Feature:.+\\] --minStartupPods=8', '--timeout=240m')' returned non-zero exit status 1.
+ EXIT_VALUE=1

https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-ci-logs/pr-logs/pull/129680/pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-disruptive/1880169827780268032

Related-to kubernetes/kubernetes#129680

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Jan 21, 2025
@carlory
Copy link
Member Author

carlory commented Jan 21, 2025

/cc @jongwooo @BenTheElder

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

pacoxu commented Jan 21, 2025

/assign @aojea @dims

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

pacoxu commented Jan 21, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 21, 2025
@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: carlory, xing-yang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 192596e into kubernetes:master Jan 21, 2025
7 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@carlory: Updated the job-config configmap in namespace default at cluster test-infra-trusted using the following files:

  • key sig-storage-gce-config.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-storage/sig-storage-gce-config.yaml

In response to this:

#31981 migrated sig-storage gce config jobs to the community cluster. It dropped the --stage= flag but forgot to drop the --extract=local flag. This PR removes the --extract=local flag. I learned it from #33276 and #33258 (comment)

This PR want to fix this issue:

2025/01/17 08:43:35 process.go:155: Step 'make -C /home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes quick-release' finished in 16m1.133187637s
2025/01/17 08:43:35 util.go:263: Flushing memory.
2025/01/17 08:43:40 process.go:96: Saved XML output to /logs/artifacts/junit_runner.xml.
2025/01/17 08:43:40 process.go:153: Running: bash -c . hack/lib/version.sh && KUBE_ROOT=. kube::version::get_version_vars && echo "${KUBE_GIT_VERSION-}"
2025/01/17 08:43:42 process.go:155: Step 'bash -c . hack/lib/version.sh && KUBE_ROOT=. kube::version::get_version_vars && echo "${KUBE_GIT_VERSION-}"' finished in 1.681961649s
2025/01/17 08:43:42 main.go:326: Something went wrong: failed to acquire k8s binaries: open /home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/gcs-stage: no such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "/workspace/scenarios/kubernetes_e2e.py", line 391, in <module>
   main(parse_args())
 File "/workspace/scenarios/kubernetes_e2e.py", line 307, in main
   mode.start(runner_args)
 File "/workspace/scenarios/kubernetes_e2e.py", line 136, in start
   check_env(env, self.command, *args)
 File "/workspace/scenarios/kubernetes_e2e.py", line 57, in check_env
   subprocess.check_call(cmd, env=env)
 File "/usr/lib/python3.11/subprocess.py", line 413, in check_call
   raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '('kubetest', '--dump=/logs/artifacts', '--gcp-service-account=/etc/service-account/service-account.json', '--build=quick', '--up', '--down', '--test', '--provider=gce', '--cluster=bootstrap-e2e', '--gcp-network=bootstrap-e2e', '--extract=local', '--gcp-master-image=gci', '--gcp-node-image=gci', '--gcp-zone=us-west1-b', '--test_args=--ginkgo.focus=\\[sig-storage\\].*\\[Disruptive\\] --ginkgo.skip=\\[Driver:.gcepd\\]|\\[Flaky\\]|\\[Feature:.+\\] --minStartupPods=8', '--timeout=240m')' returned non-zero exit status 1.
+ EXIT_VALUE=1

https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-ci-logs/pr-logs/pull/129680/pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-disruptive/1880169827780268032

Related-to kubernetes/kubernetes#129680

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@carlory carlory deleted the fix-pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-disruptive branch January 22, 2025 02:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants