Unit - 1
Unit - 1
Semester – V(CHEM)
CHAPTER: 1
Chapter Name: Introduction and Process design aspects
The chemical engineer has many tools to choose from in the development of a
profitable plant design. None, when properly utilized, will probably contribute
as much to the optimization of the design as the use of high-speed computers.
Many problems encountered in the process development and design can be solved
rapidly with a higher degree of completeness with high-speed computers and at
less cost than with ordinary hand or desk calculators. Generally overdesign and
safety factors can be reduced with a substantial savings in capital investment.
The engineer must consider costs and probable profits constantly throughout all
the work. It is almost always better to sell many units of a product at a low profit
per unit than a few units at a high profit per unit. Consequently, the engineer must
take into account the volume of production when determining costs and total
profits for various types of designs. This obviously leads to considerations of
customer needs and demands. These factors may appear to be distantly removed
from the development of a plant design, but they are extremely important in
determining its ultimate success.
The chemical engineer (or cost engineer) must be certain to consider all
possible factors when making a cost analysis. Fixed costs, direct
production costs for raw materials, labour, maintenance, power, and
utilities must all be included along with costs for plant and administrative
overhead, distribution of the final products, and other miscellaneous items.
(b) Profitability of Investments
A major function of the directors of a manufacturing firm is to maximize the
long-term profit to the owners or the stockholders. A decision to invest in
fixed facilities carries with it the burden of continuing interest, insurance,
taxes, depreciation, manufacturing costs, etc., and also reduces the fluidity of
the company’s future actions. Capital-investment decisions, therefore, must be
made with great care.
Various types of taxes and insurance can materially affect the economic
situation for any industrial process. Because modern taxes may amount to a
major portion of a manufacturing firm’s net earnings, it is essential that the
chemical engineer be conversant with the fundamentals of taxation.
(c) Optimum design
In almost every case encountered by a chemical engineer, there are several
alternative methods which can be used for any given process or operation.
For example, formaldehyde can be produced by catalytic dehydrogenation of
methanol, by controlled oxidation of natural gas, or by direct reaction between
CO and H, under special conditions of catalyst, temperature, and pressure.
Each of these processes contains many possible alternatives involving
variables such as gas-mixture composition, temperature, pressure, and choice
of catalyst.
It is the responsibility of the chemical engineer, in this case, to choose the best
process and to incorporate into the design the equipment and methods which
will give the best results. To meet this need, various aspects of chemical
engineering plant-design optimization
(d) Optimum Economic Design
If there are two or more methods for obtaining exactly equivalent final results,
the preferred method would be the one involving the least total cost. This is
Optimization
Optimization is the use of specific methods to determine the most cost-effective
and efficient solution to a problem or design for a process. This technique is one
of the major quantitative tools in industrial decision making. A wide variety of
problems in the design, construction, operation, and analysis of chemical plants
(as well as many other industrial processes) can be resolved by optimization.
If there are two or more methods for obtaining exactly equivalent final results, the
preferred method would be the one involving the least total cost. This is the basis
of an optimum economic design.
The chemical engineer often selects a final design on the basis of conditions
giving the least total cost. In many cases, however, alternative designs do not give
final products or results that are exactly equivalent. It then becomes necessary to
consider the quality of the product or the operation as well as the total cost. When
the engineer speaks of an optimum economic design, it ordinarily means the
cheapest one selected from a number of equivalent designs.
Various types of optimum economic requirements may be encountered in design
work. For example, it may be desirable to choose a design which gives the
maximum profit per unit of time or the minimum total cost per unit of production.
Many processes require definite conditions of temperature, pressure, contact time,
or other variables if the best results are to be obtained. It is often possible to make
a partial separation of these optimum conditions from direct economic
considerations. In cases of this type, the best design is designated as the optimum
operation design. The chemical engineer should remember, however, that
economic considerations ultimately determine most quantitative decisions. Thus,
the optimum operation design is usually merely a tool or step in the development
of an optimum economic design.
Optimization can be applied in numerous ways to chemical processes and plants.
Typical projects in which optimization has been used include
1. Determining the best sites for plant location.
2. Routing tankers for the distribution of crude and refined products.
3. Sizing and layout of a pipeline.
1. Manufacturing process
2. Material and energy balances
3. Temperature and pressure ranges
4. Raw-material and product specifications
5. Yields, reaction rates, and time cycles
6. Materials of construction
7. Utilities requirements
8. Plant site
Prepared By: Mr. Jaimin Pandya Page 11
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANT DESIGN & ECONOMICS (3150506)
Semester – V(CHEM)
CHAPTER: 1
Chapter Name: Introduction and Process design aspects
When the preceding information is included in the design, the result permits
accurate estimation of required capital investment, manufacturing costs, and
potential profits. Consideration should be given to the types of buildings, heating,
ventilating, lighting, power, drainage, waste disposal, safety facilities,
instrumentation, etc.
Before a manufacturer is contacted, the engineer should evaluate the design needs
and prepare a preliminary specification sheet for the equipment. This preliminary
specification sheet can be used by the engineer as a basis for the preparation of the
final specifications, or it can be sent to a manufacturer with a request for
suggestions and fabrication information.
The effects of corrosion and erosion must be considered in the design of chemical
plants and equipment. Chemical resistance and physical properties of
constructional materials, therefore, are important factors in the choice and design
of equipment. The materials of construction may be resistant to the corrosive
action of any chemicals that may contact the exposed surfaces.
If there is any doubt concerning suitable materials for construction of equipment,
reference should be made to the literature or laboratory tests should be carried out
under conditions similar to the final operating conditions. The results from the
laboratory tests indicate the corrosion resistance of the material and also the
effects on the product caused by contact with the particular material. Further tests
on a pilot-plant scale may be desirable in order to determine the amount of erosion
resistance or the effects of other operational factors.
In general design work, the magnitudes of safety factors are dictated by economic
or market considerations, the accuracy of the design data and calculations,
potential changes in the operating performance, background information available
on the overall process, and the amount of conservatism used in developing the
individual components of the design. Each safety factor must be chosen on basis
of the existing conditions, and the chemical engineer should not hesitate to use a
safety factor of zero if the situation warrants it.
continuous flow saves costs, energy and time. When this process is properly
implemented, it can reduce waste, improve quality by making it easier to identify and
correct errors, increase productivity and adapt to the needs of customers more
efficiently than batch processing.
When comparing different processes, consideration should always be given to the
advantages of continuous operation over batch operation. In many cases, costs can be
reduced by using continuous instead of batch processes. Less labour is required, and
control of the equipment and grade of final product is simplified. Whereas batch
operation was common in the early days of the chemical industry, most processes
have been switched completely or partially to continuous operation. The advent of
many new types of control instruments has made this transition possible, and the
design engineer should be aware of the advantages inherent in any type of continuous
operation.
Evaluating the advantage and disadvantages of every type of process is important to
determine which one would work best for you.
When it comes to the cost of equipment, continuous process is more expensive than
the low process. However, when comparing the production rate, continuous have
lower rate than the continuous one. The shut-down times in continuous process is
rare, whereas it happens quite more often in a batch process.
If you don’t have enough manpower to perform the work, you can benefit more with a
continuous process, as it requires a fewer people than its counterpart. In terms of ease
of automation, batch process is relatively more difficult than the continuous process.
Both continuous and batch processes are vital in the production of materials or
products. Having a deeper understanding of each of them can help you make an
informed decision in the end.
Plants having a capacity greater than 5000 t/yr are usually continuous, whereas plants
having a capacity of less than 500 t/yr are normally batch; in some situations a
combined continuous/batch process is appropriate.
batch plants are often preferred for products with a seasonal demand,
the greater ability of batch plants makes them more suitable for products with a short
lifetime, some reactions are so slow that batch reactors are the only seasonable
alternative, batch operation turns out to be ideal for handling materials which foul
equipment very rapidly, because the equipment is periodically started, stopped and
cleaned
It is very difficult to build a continuous process when a low capacity of slurries must
be handled.
Semi-continuous cyclic operations are often encountered in the chemical industry, and
the design engineer should understand the methods for determining optimum cycle
times in this type of operation. Although product is delivered continuously, the rate of
delivery decreases with time owing to scaling, collection of side product, reduction in
conversion efficiency, or similar causes. It becomes necessary, therefore, to shut
down the operation periodically in order to restore the original conditions for high
production rates. The optimum cycle time can be determined for conditions such as
maximum amount of production per unit of time or minimum cost per unit of
production.
4. Equipment
a. Availability
b. Materials of construction
c. Initial costs
d. Maintenance and installation costs
e. Replacement requirements
f. Special designs
5. Plant location
a. Amount of land required
b. Transportation facilities
c. Proximity to markets and raw-material sources
d. Availability of service and power facilities
e. Availability of labor
f. Climate
g. Legal restrictions and taxes
6. Costs
a. Raw materials
b. Energy
c. Depreciation
d. Other fixed charges
e. Processing and overhead
f. Special labor requirements
g. Real estate
h. Patent rights
i. Environmental controls
7. Time factor
a. Project completion deadline
b. Process development required
c. Market timeliness
d. Value of money
8. Process considerations
a. Technology availability
may be initiated. Process development, on, a pilot-plant or semi works scale is usually
desirable in order to -obtain accurate design data.
Valuable information on material and energy balances can be obtained, and process
conditions can be examined to supply data on temperature and pressure variation,
yields, rates, grades of raw materials and products, batch versus continuous operation,
material of construction, operating characteristics, and other pertinent design
variables.
The first step in preparing the preliminary design is to establish the bases for design.
In addition to the known specifications for the product and availability of raw
materials, the design can be controlled by such items as the expected annual operating
factor (fraction of the year that the plant will be in operation), temperature of the
cooling water, available steam pressures, fuel used, value of by-products, etc. The
next step consists of preparing a simplified flow diagram showing the processes that
are involved and deciding upon the unit operations which will be required. A
preliminary material balance at this point may very quickly eliminate some the
alternative cases. Flow rates and stream conditions for the remaining cases are now
evaluated by complete material balances, energy balances, and a knowledge of raw-
material and product specifications, yields, reaction rates, and time cycles. The
temperature, pressure, and composition of every process stream is determined. Stream
enthalpies, percent vapor, liquid, and solid, heat duties, etc., are included where
pertinent to the process.
The preliminary design and the process-development work give the results necessary
for a detailed-estimate design. The following factors should be:
1. Manufacturing process
2. Material and energy balances
3. Temperature and pressure ranges
4. Raw-material and product specifications
5. Yields, reaction rates, and time cycles
6. Materials of construction
7. Utilities requirements
8. Plant site
Final process designs (or detailed designs) can be prepared for purchasing and
construction from a detailed-estimate design. Detailed drawings are made for the
fabrication of special equipment, and specifications are prepared for purchasing
standard types of equipment and materials. A complete plant layout is prepared, and
blueprints and instructions for construction are developed. Piping diagrams and other
construction details are included. Specifications are given for warehouses,
laboratories, guard-houses, fencing, change houses, transportation facilities, and
similar items. The final final process design must be developed with the assistance of
persons skilled in various engineering fields, such as architectural, ventilating,
electrical, and civil. Safety conditions and environmental-impact factors must also
always be taken into account.
Sources of Exposure
o The main objective of health-hazard control is to limit the chemical dosage of a
chemical by minimizing or preventing exposure. It is not practical to measure or
control the chemical dosage directly; rather, exposure is measured and limits are
set for the control of such exposure.
o Understanding of the sources of contaminants to which workers are exposed is
important for the recognition, evaluation, and control of occupational health
hazards. For example, mechanical abrasions of solid materials by cutting,
grinding, or drilling can produce small particles which can form an airborne dust
cloud or solid aerosol. Liquid aerosols, on the other hand, may be produced by
any process that supplies sufficient energy to overcome the surface tension of the
liquid. This process occurs intentionally in spray coating and unintentionally when
oil mist is generated from lubricants or coolants used on high-speed machinery.
Liquid aerosols can also be produced by condensation.
o In the same vein, certain waste-handling procedures, even those performed
intermittently, can result in very serious contaminant exposure without proper
precautions. Workers need to be instructed in the proper procedures for cleaning
up spills and accumulated debris. Spilled materials can become airborne and pose
an inhalation hazard. Spills and chemical process wastes may end up in the waste-
water treatment facilities where they again can be volatilized into the air and result
in unexpected worker exposure.
Exposure Evaluation
o An estimate of the toxicity or intrinsic hazard is needed for each material
identified in the inventory. Such information for many chemicals in the form of a
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) is required by the OSHA Hazard
Communication Standard. (Other countries have similar requirements.) Standard
hazard-data sources may need to be consulted for those chemical compounds for
which no MSDSs are presently available. Adequate hazard data may be lacking
for various mixtures that are unique to the plant. For such mixtures, it may be
necessary to analyze the contents and then estimate the overall hazard based on
the individual components.
o To perform a risk assessment and then prioritize the exposure measurement effort
requires an approximate initial exposure potential assessment. For each chemical
present and for each source of exposure for that chemical, an estimate of exposure
can be made. These exposure estimates combined with a toxicity estimate from
the hazard data can then be combined to yield a risk estimate which can be used as
a basis for prioritization of the measurement and monitoring effort.
Exposure-Hazard Control
o When it is concluded that an exposure problem exists, decisions need to be made
regarding the implementation of hazard-control measures for the purpose of
reducing exposure and correspondingly reducing the risks. However, a given set
of exposure conditions does not lead to a fixed set of control strategies.
o There are many options. Since zero risk is not attainable, a decision must be made
relative to the degree of risk reduction that is to be attained. Then a series of
choices must be made from a wide range of options available to achieve the
desired risk reduction. This choice of options is a judgmental decision since the
precise degree of risk assessment achievable by a specific strategy is usually not
known in advance. Furthermore, the strategy selected must meet company safety
standards, comply with regulatory requirements, and receive worker acceptability,
and not adversely impact production and operability.
o An engineering system or work procedure that is utilized to eliminate a health
effect should be evaluated to determine the degree to which it reduces the
occurrence of the health effect. Measurements of exposure, for use in comparison
with occupational-exposure limits, need to be made over the averaging time
appropriate to the standard.
Fire and Explosion Hazards
o Besides toxic emissions, fire and explosion are the two most dangerous events
likely to occur in a chemical plant. Considerable resources are expended to
prevent both of these hazards or control them when they do occur because of an
accident. These two hazards account for the major loss of life and property in the
chemical and petroleum industry.
Loss Prevention
o Loss prevention in process design can be summarized under the following broad
headings:
1. Identification and assessment of the major hazards.
2. Control of the hazards by the most appropriate means; for example,
containment, substitution, improved maintenance, etc.
3. Control of the process, i.e., prevention of hazardous conditions in
process operating variables by utilizing automatic control and relief
systems, interlocks, alarms, etc.
4. Limitation of the loss when an incident occurs.
Safety Index
o The safety and loss prevention guide developed by the Dow Chemical Company
provides a method for evaluating the potential hazards of a process and assessing
the safety and loss-prevention measures needed. In this procedure, a numerical
“Fire and Explosion Index” is calculated, based on the nature of the process and
the properties of the materials. The index can be used two different ways.
o The Dow index applies only to main process units and does not cover process
auxiliaries. Also, only fire and explosion hazards are considered. Recently the
index has been expanded to include business-interruption losses.
Safety Audits
o The principal function of most safety audits in the past has been to verify the
adequacy of safety equipment and safety rules. The former includes equipment for
fire protection, personnel protection, and on-site emergency responses. In addition
to reviewing the general safety rules, the audit has provided explicit safety rules
for new process areas and associated emergency response procedures. However,
with the greatly increased concerns for environmental health, safety, community
relations, and loss prevention, safety audits have become significant, as well as
continuous activities for all chemical process companies.
Fault trees originated in the aerospace industry and have been used extensively by the
nuclear power industry to qualify and quantify the hazards and risks associated with
nuclear power plants. This approach is becoming more popular in the chemical
process industries, mostly as a result of the successful experiences demonstrated by
the nuclear industry.
A fault tree for anything but the simplest of plants can be large, involving thousands
of process events. Fortunately, this approach lends itself to computerization, with a
variety of computer programs commercially available to draw fault trees based on an
interactive session. Fault trees are a deductive method for identifying ways in which
hazards can lead to accidents.
The approach starts with a well-defined accident, or top event, and works backward
toward the various scenarios that can cause the accident.
For instance, a flat tire on an automobile is caused by two possible events. In one case
the flat is due to driving over debris on the road, such as a nail. The other possible
cause is tire failure.
The flat tire is identified as the top event. The two contributing causes are either basic
or intermediate events. The basic events are events that cannot be defined further, and
intermediate events are events that can. For this example, driving over the road debris
is a basic event because no further definition is possible. The tire failure is an
intermediate event because it results from either a defective tire or a worn tire. The
flat tire example is pictured using a fault tree logic diagram, shown in Figure C.
The circles denote basic events and the rectangles denote intermediate events. The
fishlike symbol represents the OR logic function. It means that either of the input
events will cause the output state to occur. As shown in Figure C, the flat tire is
caused by either debris on the road or tire failure. Similarly, the tire failure is caused
by either a defective tire or a worn tire.
Events in a fault tree are not restricted to hardware failures. They can also include
software, human, and environmental factors.
Prepared By: Mr. Jaimin Pandya Page 36
CHEMICAL PROCESS PLANT DESIGN & ECONOMICS (3150506)
Semester – V(CHEM)
CHAPTER: 1
Chapter Name: Introduction and Process design aspects
FIGURE C
Before the actual fault tree is drawn, a number of preliminary steps must be taken:
1. Define precisely the top event. Events such as "high reactor temperature" or "liquid
level too high" are precise and appropriate. Events such as "explosion of reactor" or "fire
in process" are too vague, whereas an event such as "leak in valve7' is too specific.
2. Define the existing event. What conditions are sure to be present when the top event
occurs?
3. Define the unallowed events. These are events that are unlikely or are not under
consideration at the present. This could include wiring failures, lightning, tornadoes, and
hurricanes.
4. Define the physical bounds of the process. What components are to be considered in
the Fault tree?
5. Define the equipment confiGration. What valves are open or closed? What are the
liquid levels? Is this a normal operation state?
6. Define the level of resolution. Will the analysis consider just a valve, or will it be
necessary to consider the valve components?
Figure
The development of a process from a simple BFD through the PFD and finally to the
P&ID. Each step showed additional information. This can be seen by following the
progress of the distillation unit as it moves through the three diagrams described.
1. Block Flow Diagram (BFD) (see Figure 2.1): The column was shown as a part of
one of the three process blocks.
2. Process Flow Diagram (PFD) (see Figure 2.2): The column was shown as the
following set of individual equipment: a tower, condenser, reflux drum, reboiler,
reflux pumps, and associated process controls.
3. Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID) (see Figure 2.3): The column was
shown as a comprehensive diagram that includes additional details such as pipe sizes,
utility streams, and sample taps, numerous indicators, and so on. It is the only unit
operation on the diagram. The value of these diagrams does not end with the start-up
of the plant. The design values on the diagram are changed to represent the actual
values determined under normal operating conditions. These conditions form a “base
case” and are used to compare operations throughout the life of the plant.
Process flow diagrams: The chemical engineer uses process flow diagrams to show the
sequence of equipment and unit operations in the overall process, to simplify
visualization of the manufacturing procedures, and to indicate the quantities of materials
and energy transfer. These diagrams may be divided into three general types:
(1) Qualitative,
(2) Quantitative, and
(3) combined-detail.
A qualitative flow diagram indicates the flow of materials, unit operations involved,
equipment necessary, and special information on operating temperatures and
pressures. A quantitative flow diagram shows the quantities of materials required for
the process operation. An example of a qualitative flow diagram for the production of
nitric acid is shown in Fig. 2.4.
Fig. 2.4
Figure 2.5 presents a quantitative flow diagram for the same process.
Preliminary flow diagrams are made during the early stages of a design project.
As the design proceeds toward completion, detailed information on flow
quantities and equipment specifications becomes available, and combined detail
flow diagrams can be prepared.
This type of diagram shows the qualitative flow pattern and serves as a base
reference for giving equipment specifications, quantitative data, and sample
calculations. Tables presenting pertinent data on the process and the equipment
are cross-referenced to the drawing. In this way, qualitative information and
quantitative data are combined on the basis of one flow diagram. The drawing
does not lose its effectiveness by presenting too much information; yet the
necessary data are readily available by direct reference to the accompanying
tables.
A typical combined-detail flow diagram shows the location of temperature and
pressure regulators and indicators, as well as the location of critical control valves
and special instruments. Each piece of equipment is shown and is designated by a
defined code number. For each piece of equipment, accompanying tables give
essential information, such as specifications for purchasing, specifications for
construction, type of fabrication, quantities and types of chemicals involved, and
sample calculations. combined-detail flow diagram shows in fig 2.2