sodapdf-converted
sodapdf-converted
On
BIOMETRIC VOTING MACHINE
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
Submitted By
2024-2025
JOGINPALLY B.R. ENGINEERING COLLEGE
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION
CERTIFICATE
I would like to take this opportunity to place it on record that this technical
seminar would never have taken shape but for the cooperation extended
to me by certain individuals. Though it is not possible to name all of them,
it would be unpardonable on my part if I do not mention some of very
important persons.
MACHINE 2
2.2 ESP8266 3
2.4 LCD 4
2.5 Buzzer 4
CHAPTER-3 WORKING
4.2 Disadvantages 8
Existing System :-
The author of conducted a study where they engineered a biometric voting machine employing
a combination of a fingerprint scanner and Arduino technology. Remarkably, the system
demonstrated a commendable 95% accuracy in both fingerprint identification and matching
against stored data. This innovation not only showcased cost-effectiveness but also introduced
the convenience of remote monitoring capabilities.
Proposed System: The new system makes use of a biometric feature (fingerprint) to
authenticate users of the system. Fingerprint recognition hardware is integrated with the
system so has to solve the problem of the existing system.
➢ Needs assessment
➢ Feasibility studies
➢ Securing funding
The Arduino Uno serves as the central hub for data collection, aggregating information from the
ESP32 Camera, Ultrasonic Sensor, and optionally, the GPS Module. It processes this sensor data
by combining distance readings with animal detection information and integrating location data
if available.
Notify the Users The LCD Display in the Fingerprint-Based Electronic Voting System serves as a
crucial interface, providing real-time feedback and information to both voters and election
officials. Typically integrated into the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM), the LCD Display offers a
user-friendly platform for voters to interact with the system. During the voting process, it
displays relevant instructions, and candidate information, and confirms the successful
submission of a vote.
The Buzzer in the Fingerprint-Based Electronic Voting System plays a pivotal role in providing
audible feedback to both voters and election officials, enhancing the overall user experience and
system functionality. Integrated into the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM), the buzzer serves as
an important indicator during various stages of the voting process.
• As a pre-poll procedure the finger prints of all the voters are collected and
stored in a database initially at time of distributing voting cards. At the time
of voting, the option of the voter is taken along with the finger print.
• The finger print taken by the scanner is sent to the DSP chip through an in-
built A/D converter. The processed image is transferred to hard disk with
biasing of SDRAM.
• The option entered by the voter is transferred to chip through DEMUX and
is stored in the memory. If the transferred image is matched with any of the
records in the data base, then the interrupt is given by the HARD DISK to
DSP chip.
• Then the option is considered in the count. After the acquisition of the
count this is transmitted to the HOST computer or central server using
telephone lines. As the count of each party is transmitted to the HOST.
• From all the VOTING MACHINES present in the constituency, the HOST will
add parallel count of particular party and makes the final count of each
party in ascending order. The final count is transferred to the main HOST
(head quarters) using either telephone lines or radio waves.
Flow diagram :-
➢ The biometric authentication module facilitates the verification process, ensuring the
legitimacy of voters through fingerprint matching with the centralized database.
Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) intricately linked to the central system provide a
secure platform for casting votes.
➢ The IoT infrastructure plays a pivotal role in ensuring encrypted and efficient data
transmission between devices, safeguarding the integrity and confidentiality of
biometric information.
Block Diagram For Verification Of Voters:-
• Here the identity of a person is checked whether he\she belongs to the particular
constituency or not. The machine which takes the finger print of the person checks it
with the data base already stored in it.
• If the finger print matches it will give access to the person to cast his vote and if it
doesn't match any of the finger prints stored in the data base then it will reject the voter.
• Thus his method will enable the members of that particular constituency only to vote.
This can be taken as the first step to avoid rigging.
• To have a faster performance the searching technique is implemented on the basis of
GOOGLE SEARCH. The process in the form of a flow chart is as given below.
Which biometric data should be captured?
Fingerprints :-
Automatic fingerprint identification systems can be based on scanning a single fingerprint for
each registrant. This is the fastest and simplest procedure. However, only capturing one
fingerprint increases the possibility of fraud, as the same person may register multiple times by
using different fingers. Capturing more than one fingerprint for each voter reduces the potential
for fraud, and increases the amount and quality of available fingerprint data. In this way, false
match rates can be greatly reduced. In recent years, 10-fingerprint scanners have become more
common. They scanall 10 fingers in three step (four fingers on the left hand, four fingers on the
righthand and both thumbs)
Facial images:-
Many digital voter registration kits capture a photo of the voter. This photo can be printed on
voter ID cards or voter lists, and processed into a biometric template for facial-recognition
systems.
Utilizing facial recognition in addition to fingerprint recognition can further increase a
system’s accuracy. However, this requires high-quality photographs taken in good lighting
conditions and images with a neutral facial expression. Getting such high-quality pictures,
especially in a field environment, is very difficult. Facial-recognition systems should therefore
only be used in addition to fingerprint recognition systems.
Signatures:-
While electronic signature pads are able to capture signatures, this is not very common in voter
registration. A person’s signature may intentionally or unintentionally vary significantly, which
makes reliable electronic matching difficult. Images of voter signatures can still be useful to
print on voter ID cards, for example for visual comparison against the signature on the voter
list.
Iris scans:-
Iris-recognition systems are a relatively new development and have rarely been used in
elections; Somalia is the only country currently using such a system for election purposes, in
Somaliland. Iris recognition has several advantages over fingerprint recognition: the eye and
the iris are better protected physically than fingerprints, and an iris scan can be taken from a
distance without contact withany equipment, making dirt and physical wear less of an issue. On
the downside, recognition rates depend on lighting conditions, and the cost of iris-scanning
technology is still comparatively high.
Advantages :-
1. Transparency
2. Participation
3. Scalable
4. Fair
5. Secure
Disadvantages:-
1.Privacy Concerns
2.Security Risks
3.Technical Failures
4.Public Trust
5.Complexity
Conclusion and Future Enhancements :-
The Electronic Voting System using IoT is a significant leap forward in the technical landscape
of electronic voting. The integration of fingerprint biometrics in the IoT framework establishes
channels, and blockchain technology forms a resilient foundation safeguarding the integrity of
IoT, with its current technical sophistication, serves as a robust platform with the potential for
transformed the Fingerprint Based Biometric Smart Electronic Voting System using IoT into a