TELEMATICS_FINAL_2019_LR
TELEMATICS_FINAL_2019_LR
TELEMATICS IN
PROFESSIONAL
VEHICLE FLEETS
25 YEARS 1993-2018
About PRAISE
Using the roads is a necessary part of our working lives. But it’s
an ordinary activity that leads to an incredibly high level of injury
and death. ETSC’s PRAISE (Preventing Road Accidents and Injuries
for the Safety of Employees) project addresses the safety aspects
of driving at work and driving to work. Its aim is to promote
best practice in order to help employers secure high road safety
standards for their employees.
Author
Laurence Atchison
October 2018
25 YEARS 1993-2018
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
6. RECOMMENDATIONS 23
BIBLIOGRAPHY 26
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A range of measures has been introduced to try and tackle consensus that they have a proven effect on road safety.
this problem. Governments have updated legislation, Nevertheless, existing research findings do indicate some
clarifying the obligations of employers concerning the positive trends as well as noting the utility of telematics
safety and well-being of their employees and ensuring as a means for undertaking future research.
that road safety is an integral part of this. Health and
safety authorities have issued improved guidance As with many work-related road safety interventions,
for organisations, to help them abide by their legal there are numerous case studies which highlight the
responsibilities but also encouraging them to go beyond positive effects of telematics in fleets and seek to promote
these requirements and be proactive in managing road ‘best’, or at least ‘good’, practice. While case studies are
safety for their workers. no substitute for proper research, collectively they do
demonstrate the possibilities of what can be achieved
Finally, organisations have taken up the mantle of road by bringing about changes in road safety management,
safety themselves. A plethora of road safety schemes, including the use of telematics.
initiatives and programmes has been implemented with
the aim of enhancing the safety of employees, but also As with road safety in general, the growth of technological
reducing costs and improving efficiency. These include solutions to work-related road safety problems has led
driver training, group discussions, incentives, publicity to a mixture of clear advantages and disadvantages.
campaigns and improved management of road safety Similarly, the debate surrounding the potential role of
across the organisation. technologies ranges from enthusiasm to suspicion.
Recently, there has been a growth in the use of in- In the work-related road safety context, it is clear that
vehicle data recorders, also known as telematics systems, there is significant potential to be gained from the
to monitor and collect data on an individual’s driving. effective use of technology. The extant research and the
Some are used to capture data in the period immediately experience of many organisations points to the usefulness
preceding a collision, but increasingly they are being of telematics as a tool to manage work-related road risk.
used to continually monitor driving behaviour. The The task now should be to study this intervention more
detailed data that is collected can then be used for a closely in order to properly understand it and to maximise
number of purposes, such as feedback sessions, future the potential benefits, while minimising any risk.
driver training, the calculation of incentives, and the
identification of potential fleet-wide issues.
N.B. This report focuses primarily on the use of telematics
Research has been undertaken into the effectiveness of
in driving for work, although references are made to
telematics as a measure to improve road safety. However,
other uses of telematics.
weaknesses in research methods combined with an
overall lack of research means that there is not yet a
25,250 people lost their lives on EU roads in 2017, Road collisions give rise to huge societal costs; a recent
representing a 2% reduction on the 2016 figure. This study estimated the value to society of preventing all
number has fallen by only 3% in the last four years. reported collision in the EU to be about 270 billion EUR
in 2015 (nearly twice as large as the annual EU budget).4
There has been progress over a longer period but it is The monetary value (for 2017), of the human losses
not enough to meet the EU’s target to halve road deaths avoided by preventing one road death are calculated to
between 2010 and 2020. Since 2010, the average annual be 2.11 million EUR at factor cost.5
progress in reducing the number of road deaths in the EU
has been 3.1%, equivalent to a 20% reduction between The total value of the reductions in road deaths in the
2010 and 2017 (Fig. 1). A 6.7% year-to-year reduction EU28 for 2017 compared to 2010 is thus estimated at
was needed over the 2010-2020 period to reach the approximately € 13 billion, and the value of the reductions
2020 target through consistent annual progress. As a in the years 2011-2017 taken together compared with
consequence of the slow progress between 2014 and five years at the 2010 rate is about € 70 billion.
2017, for the EU to reach the 2020 target, road deaths
need to be reduced by around 14.5% annually in the If the EU had moved towards the 2020 road safety
upcoming three years – an almost impossible task.12 target through constant progress of 6.7%, the greater
reductions in road deaths in the years 2011-2017 would
Similarly, there has been little progress in reducing have increased the valuation of the benefit to society by
serious road traffic injuries since 2010. The European about € 40 billion to about € 110 billion over those years.
Commission estimates that more than 135,000 suffer
serious injuries each year.3
Fig. 1 – Reduction in the number of road deaths since 2010 (solid blue line) plotted against the EU target
for 2020 (dotted blue line).
1
ETSC (2018), 12th Road Safety Performance Index Report, p6.
2
Ibid., p15.
3
Ibid., p20.
4
ETSC (2018), Briefing: 5th EU Road Safety Action Programme 2020-2030, p9.
5
ETSC (2018), 12th Road Safety Performance Index Report, p16.
The high value of societal costs avoided during 2011- Using the road for business is the leading cause of work-
2017 shows once more that the saving potential offered related deaths and injuries.9 It is estimated that 6 out of
by sustained road safety improvements is considerable, 10 work accidents resulting in death are road collisions.10
making clear to policy-makers the potential for road These types of collisions account for 39% of work-related
safety policies to provide a sound investment. deaths in the European Union.11
6
Murray, W. (2011), “The Work-Related road safety business case: Societal, business, legal and cost factors”.
7
ETSC (2017), PIN Flash Report 33: Tapping the Potential for Reducing Work-Related Road Deaths and Injuries, p6
8
UK Department for Transport (2013), Reported Road Casualties Great Britain 2012.
9
European Commission/European Road Safety Observatory (2009), SafetyNet: Work-related Road Safety
10
EU-OSHA (2010), A review of accidents and injuries to road transport drivers, p7.
11
European Commission (2005), “Causes and circumstances of accidents at work in the EU”.
12
IOSH - Fatal Collisions on the road and safety and health (June 2016)
13
Eurostat, Accidents at Work (ESAW, 2008 onwards), https://goo.gl/tzh5yH
For employers in organisations of all types, using the road for work, or to get to work, is probably the most risky
activity to which they are exposing their employees. Consequently, ensuring their safety should be a priority.
Work-related road safety (WRRS) should also be a priority for organisations for legal, societal, reputational, financial
and efficiency reasons. From a reputational and business perspective, being involved in a fatal or serious collision
can have a significant impact on organisations and their leaders. It should go without saying that the impact on the
person driving the vehicle at the time, and their family can be catastrophic.
Fig. 2 - Share of incidents resulting in days off and deaths, which occurred on the road in France, 2008-
2012.14
Effectively managing road safety provides an opportunity to reduce costs in several ways:
Reduced running costs, such as fuel consumption and vehicle maintenance through better driving standards;
Fewer working days lost to injury/absenteeism and a reduction in the long-term associated costs;
Fewer missed orders and business opportunities, reduced risk of losing the goodwill of customers;
Reduced insurance premiums and costs associated with insurance claims (e.g. excesses/deductibles).
14
ETSC (2014), The Business Case for Managing Work-Related Road Safety, p8.
15
Eurogip (2013), Statistical review of occupational injuries – France.
16
Ibid.
17
ETSC (2012), Fitness to Drive, p3.
18
ETSC (2012), Work Related Road Safety Management Programmes, p7.
19
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2001), Factsheet on Preventing Road Accidents involving Heavy Goods Vehicles.
20
CSR film from ASDA available from https://goo.gl/FJPW2U / ETSC (2014), The Business Case for Managing Work-Related Road Safety.
21
Health and Safety Executive (UK 2014), Driving at Work: Managing Work-Related Road Safety, pp.1-2 / ISO 39001:2012 https://goo.gl/UvNiC4
For many years, road safety interventions aimed to The vehicles used in the workplace and by the workforce
change the behaviour of individual employees. Recently, vary between organisations: some primarily use cars,
there has been a shift towards more holistic approaches whereas others will use larger, more specialised vehicles.
across an entire organisation. For example, many However, regardless of the types used, by introducing
organisations now conduct work-related road safety risk vehicles into the fleet with higher levels of crashworthiness
management schemes, ensuring that road safety is a key and which feature in-vehicle technologies, organisations
part of occupational safety and health and not simply an can help avoid collisions and mitigate their severity if
add-on. they do occur.25
Organisations can work to develop a ‘safety culture’, New advanced driver assistance technologies, such as
through safety policies and procedures issued by a senior Intelligent Speed Assistance, Autonomous Emergency
management that is committed and willing to invest in Braking and alcohol interlocks, can help address a range
safety, and implemented by a line management and of key road safety issues like speeding and drink driving.
workforce that is willing to comply.22
Driver training has long been the primary, and often Journey organisation and route planning play an
only, approach used by organisations (although it is a important role in an organisation’s approach to road risk
contentious topic in the wider field of road safety). It and can affect key risk factors such as fatigue and stress.
is used to instruct fleet drivers in how to improve their In many organisations employees spend long hours on the
overall driving behaviour but also how to respond to road. As workloads increase and drivers face escalating
individual hazards and situations on the road.23 It can also pressures to deliver faster and more cheaply (often using
be used as a means to instil greater general responsibility ‘just-in-time management’ systems), drivers can become
on the road, as well as a positive attitude and interest in over-worked and over-stressed by the demands place on
safety issues and further measures.24 them.
Group sessions can also be used, in which employees Organisations can help avoid risk by ensuring that drivers
collectively discuss safety issues to try and bring about are only taking journeys that are necessary. If a journey is
behavioural change. Unlike day-to-day road use, in deemed necessary, then there are steps they can take to
the professional fleet environment it is also possible to reduce journey risk as much as possible, such as changing
reward good driving behaviour and low collision rates schedules, distances and plans to allow sufficient time
through the use of incentive schemes. for drivers to complete their journeys safely (including
delivery stops, rest breaks and foreseeable weather and
Campaigns and publicity drives can be used to focus on traffic conditions).26
specific safety issues that have arisen in an organisation
or those linked to different seasons or types of work.
22
ETSC (2012), Work Related Road Safety Management Programmes, p10.
23
IOSH (2011), Work-related road safety: A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of interventions, Grayson, G. B., and Helman S., TRL, p6.
24
ETSC (2010), Fit for Road safety: From Risk Assessment to Training, p2.
25
ETSC (2009), How Can In-vehicle Safety Equipment Improve Road Safety at Work?
26
ETSC (2014), Managing the Road Risk of Van Fleets, pp. 26-27.
Vehicle speed;
Vehicle location;
Acceleration;
Braking;
Cornering;
Seatbelt use;
Fuel consumption.27
27
RoSPA (2013), Road Safety and In-vehicle Monitoring (Black Box) Technology, p7.
28
RoSPA (2014), Young Drivers at Work (Scotland): Black Box Pilot, p7.
29
RoSPA (2017), Driving for Work: Using Telematics, p2.
30
ETSC (2009), How Can In-vehicle Safety Equipment Improve Road Safety at Work?, p9.
31
ETSC (2016), Reducing Casualties Involving Young Drivers and Riders in Europe, pp.33-34.
32
RoSPA (2013), Road Safety and In-vehicle Monitoring (Black Box) Technology, p4.
33
ETSC, PRAISE (2011), Tackling Fatigue: EU Social Rules and heavy goods vehicle drivers, p8.
34
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of March 2006 on the harmonization of certain legislation relating to road
transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85,
https://goo.gl/fyImRV
35
European Commission, Driving time and rest periods, https://goo.gl/uEstKl Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 4 February 2014 on tachographs in road transport on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport Text with EEA relevance,
https://goo.gl/9mj046
36
TRL 2015, Report 755: Provision of Telematics Research, Tong, S., Lloyd, L., Durrell, L., McRae-McKee, K., Husband, P., Delmonte E., Parry, I., Buttress, S.,
pp. 41-42.
Telematics systems can also be linked to a video camera, Typically, the system will generate risk-ratings for
in order to provide a “driver’s eye” view or a view of individual drivers, based on calculations made using the
the inside of the vehicle. This can help provide more data collected from the vehicle. These ratings can then
information on the context in which incidents take be used for a range of purposes: to identify risks and
place, or the reasons for certain types of driver behaviour behavioural trends, develop and prioritise driver training,
(e.g. seatbelt use, in-vehicle distractions such as mobile make changes to fleet management (e.g. schedules and
phones or other passengers). routes) and if necessary for disciplinary purposes. These
are discussed more in section 3.3 below.
37
TRL 2015, Report 755: Provision of Telematics Research, Tong, S., Lloyd, L., Durrell, L., McRae-McKee, K., Husband, P., Delmonte E., Parry, I., Buttress, S., p43.
38
ETSC, 2010, Driving for Work: Minimising In-Vehicle Distraction, p2.
39
RoSPA (2013), Road Safety and In-vehicle Monitoring (Black Box) Technology, p2
40
ETS (2018), Briefing: EU Mobility Package III including new vehicle safety standards, https://etsc.eu/briefing-eu-mobility-package-iii-including-new-vehicle-
safety-standards/
41
Together for Safer Roads 2016, Advancing Road Safety Best Practices for Companies and Their Fleets: Guidelines for developing and managing transporta-
tion programs, p15.
42
RoSP (2013), Road Safety and In-vehicle Monitoring (Black Box) Technology, p34.
43
European Commission, 2006, Cost-benefit assessment and prioritisation of vehicle technologies, p145/p22.
44
RoSPA – Driving for Work: Using Telematics (2017), p2.
45
ETSC (2011), Driving for Work: Managing Speed, p19.
46
Ibid./ETSC (2009), How Can In-Vehicle Safety Equipment Improve Road Safety at Work?, p9.
47
OECD (2018), Speed and Crash Risk. https://goo.gl/E7YMEq
48
ETSC (2011), Driving for Work: Managing Speed, p31.
49
Ibid., p19.
50
ETSC (2014) Managing the Road Risk of Van Fleets, p34.
51
ETSC (2011) Driving for Work: Managing Speed, p31.
52
Ibid.
53
ETSC (2010), Driving for Work: Minimising In-Vehicle Distraction, p9.
Driver fatigue is another safety issue that organisations 3.2 ADDRESSING DRIVER SPECIFIC ISSUES
can do a lot to manage. Fatigue affects all road users
but is especially prevalent amongst professional fleets, in By collecting and analysing telematics information about
particular those drivers involved in road haulage. Analysis employees’ driving behaviour, strengths, weaknesses
and comparison of individual driving styles and data for and areas of concern can be identified. Employers can
the entire fleet makes it possible to identify how and monitor driving in real-time and provide immediate
when fatigue occurs and how to reduce it.55 feedback to drivers if, for example, their speed becomes
inappropriate. Data on drivers can later be used to create
It is worth noting the contribution that telematics data personalised feedback and training for individual drivers
can make to road safety at all levels. The circumstances in the long-term.59
that surround road collisions help inform local, national
and international approaches to road safety. Telematics Telematics data can even be linked to the general health
systems record detailed, objective data about vehicle and well-being of staff, an important issue for safety in
collisions, in particular the pre-crash phase, which are the workplace60 For example, a Swiss company organised
often of a higher quality than are currently available.56 consultations with eye doctors for employees who
demonstrated poor driving performance.61
This data can then be analysed by police, collision
investigators, insurance companies, vehicle As the amount of lone worker legislation increases, and
manufacturers and researchers, helping them to better with the onus put squarely on employers to protect both
understand the causes of collisions and the effectiveness their employees and those they come into contact with,
of new safety technologies.57 Other applications include it is imperative to be able to identify any potential risks.62
the provision of objective data for legal proceedings (in
Data can be fed into risk-rating systems which combine
particular when supporting witness statements, detailed
sources of information (e.g. on-the-road incidents,
information for vehicle manufacturers to ensure that
driving licence points), to create an overall risk-rating for
vehicle systems are operating correctly and the possibility
individual drivers.6364
65
ETSC (2011), Driving for Work: Managing Speed, p31.
66
ETSC (2009), How Can In-vehicle Safety Equipment Improve Road Safety at Work?, p9
67
RoSPA (2017), Driving for Work: Using Telematics, p7.
68
ETSC (2012), Work Related Road Safety Management Programmes, p26.
69
ETSC (2011), Driving for Work: Managing Speed, p18.
70
Ibid.
71
ETSC (2012), Work Related Road Safety Management Programmes, p26.
72
ETSC (2016), Managing Grey Fleet Safety
73
RoSPA (2017), Driving for Work: Using Telematics, p5.
74
ETSC (2014), Managing the Road Risk of Van Fleets, p28.
75
ETSC (2016), Making Taxis Safer, p6.
76
ETSC (2011), Driving for Work: Managing Speed, 31.
77
RoSPA (2014), Young Drivers at Work (Scotland): Black Box Pilot, p7, ETSC, 2009, How Can In-vehicle Safety Equipment Improve Road Safety at Work?, p9.
78
ETSC (2014), Managing the Road Risk of Van Fleets, p34.
79
ETSC (2016), Reducing Casualties Involving Young Drivers and Riders in Europe, p34.
80
Zurich Fleet Intelligence https://www.zurichna.com/_/media/dbe/zna/docs/kh/const/zfi.pdf?la=en&hash=49B64171B22A76ABE054D2376F881D3A6DFF6F09
81
ETSC (2009), How Can In-vehicle Safety Equipment Improve Road Safety at Work?, p8.
82
RoSPA (2016). Driving for work: Incident Reporting and Investigation, p9.
83
ETSC (2011), Driving for Work: Managing Speed, p25.
84
ETSC (2010), Fit for Road safety: From Risk Assessment to Training, p3.
85
Haddon Matrix, featured in ETSC, 2010, Fit for Road safety: From Risk Assessment to Training, p3.
86
Driving for Better Business, 2018, How the latest technology can reduce your fuel spend,
https://www.drivingforbetterbusiness.com/how-the-latest-technology-can-reduce-your-fuel-spend/
87
RoSPA (2013), Road Safety and In-vehicle Monitoring (Black Box) Technology, p7, p32.
88
RoSPA (2014), Young Drivers at Work (Scotland): Black Box Pilot, p20/p26.
89
ETSC (2010), Driving for Work: Minimising In-Vehicle Distraction, p9.
90
ETSC (2009), How Can In-vehicle Safety Equipment Improve Road Safety at Work?, p9.
91
ETSC (2010), Driving for Work: Minimising In-Vehicle Distraction, p9.
It is important when handling and using Leadership, consultation with and buy-
the data gathered from telematics in from staff are essential to developing
devices that organisations take care to any work-related road safety policy, but
abide by the data protection rules that especially one that involves telematics.96
apply in their jurisdiction.92 They should Staff and/or representative bodies (such as
also be sure to give staff a proper trade unions/staff associations) need to be
explanation of how the technology works, how they plan involved in the process and have an awareness of the
to use the data, and who will have access to the data.93 joint responsibility for operational success.97 It is in the
interest of both employers and employees and reduces
Employees may initially have concerns about elements of the potential for distrust and tension between the two.98
telematics, like real-time tracking, personal privacy and
the potential ramifications of bad training. Organisations Organisations should consider introducing a ‘telematics
should be transparent about the reasons for using policy’, in addition to, or as part of their driving for work
telematics and make sure that drivers have the option to policy that explains what is expected of both employers
challenge and discuss any conclusions drawn from the and employees.99
data.94
92
ETSC (2011), Driving for Work: Managing Speed, p31.
93
RoSPA (2017), Driving for Work: Using Telematics, p7.
94
Ibid., p3.
95
Ibid., p5.
96
ETSC (2012), Work Related Road Safety Management Programmes, p19.
97
RoSPA (2014), Young Drivers at Work (Scotland): Black Box Pilot, p31.
98
ETSC (2009), How Can In-vehicle Safety Equipment Improve Road Safety at Work?, p9.
99
RoSPA (2017), Driving for Work: Using Telematics, p9.
Unlike general road safety, work-related road safety “It is unfortunate that there
suffers from a notable lack of research. As a result, there
is only a small amount of work that looks at the field of has been so little evaluation of
telematics. Similarly, in many cases telematics are studied
as part of a group of measures, and not in isolation. an intervention that has such
Consequently, it can be difficult to assess their effects.
potential for research”
A systematic review of the literature on work-related
road safety (63 studies), carried out for the Institute of
Occupational Safety and Health in 2011, examined six
intervention areas: driver training, group discussions,
incentive schemes, publicity, organisational approaches The main conclusion of the project was that there
and in-vehicle data recorders.100 Only four of the is a “pressing need” for more and better-controlled
intervention areas were found in studies of a scientifically evaluation work in order to gain a better understanding
acceptable standard that showed statistically meaningful of work-related road safety issues.104 In particular, it is
reductions in crash risk. unfortunate that there has been so little evaluation of an
intervention that has such potential for research, given
One of these was the installation of in-vehicle data its capacity for the collection and use of real-time data in
recorders, or telematics. A major 2000 study, conducted real-world situations.105
by Wouters & Bos, was able to demonstrate that the
installation of data recorders could reduce collision Earlier studies also point to a positive safety effect
involvement among fleet drivers.101 The study covered a of telematics on commercial fleet safety. A Dutch
number of fleets in Belgium and the Netherlands and study examining police vehicle collisions noted a crash
drivers were made aware that the data being recorded reduction in EDR-equipped fleets of 20%.106 Similarly,
could be used when assessing collision responsibility.102 a UK study of police vehicles fitted with EDRs saw a
reduction of 20-25%107.
Another area that was found to be effective was the
use of incentives, in the form of a bonus. A study of In 2014, a study of young drivers at work in Scotland
multiple measures conducted in Sweden recorded a 23% with telematics installed in their vehicles demonstrated
reduction in the accident rate for the bonus group.103 an improvement in driving scores for 75% of the drivers
involved.108
100
IOSH (2011), Work-related road safety: A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of interventions, Grayson, G. B., and Helman S., TRL.
101
Wouters P and Bos J M. Traffic accident reduction by monitoring driver behaviour with in-car data recorders. Accident Analysis & Prevention 2000; 32: 643–650.
102
IOSH (2011), Work-related road safety: A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of interventions, Grayson, G. B., and Helman S., TRL, p7.
103
Ibid.
104
Ibid., p5.
105
Ibid., p7.
106
SWOV (1997) in Hynd, D., McCharty, M., (2014) Study on the benefits resulting from the installation of Event Data Recorders, Transport Research Laboratory.
107
(Charlton 2005) in Hynd, D., McCharty, M., (2014) Study on the benefits resulting from the installation of Event Data Recorders, Transport Research
Laboratory, p38.
108
RoSPA (2014), Young Drivers at Work (Scotland): Black Box Pilot, p32.
109
TRL (2015), Report 755: Provision of Telematics Research, Tong, S., Lloyd, L., Durrell, L., McRae-McKee, K., Husband, P., Delmonte E., Parry, I., Buttress, S., p6.
110
RoSPA (2013), Road Safety and In-vehicle Monitoring (Black Box) Technology, p4.
111
TRL (2015), Report 755: Provision of Telematics Research, Tong, S., Lloyd, L., Durrell, L., McRae-McKee, K., Husband, P., Delmonte E., Parry, I., Buttress, S., p46.
112
Cranfield University (2018), Sullman, M. J. M., Reducing risk amongst those driving during work.
113
Ibid., pp. 4-5.
114
TRL (2015), Report 755: Provision of Telematics Research, Tong, S., Lloyd, L., Durrell, L., McRae-McKee, K., Husband, P., Delmonte E., Parry, I., Buttress, S., pp. 13-17.
115
IOSH (2011), Work-related road safety: A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of interventions, Grayson, G. B., and Helman S., TRL, p8.
116
Hynd, D., McCharty, M., (2014) Study on the benefits resulting from the installation of Event Data Recorders, Transport Research Laboratory, p36.
117
TRL (2015), Report 755: Provision of Telematics Research, Tong, S., Lloyd, L., Durrell, L., McRae-McKee, K., Husband, P., Delmonte E., Parry, I., Buttress, S., p34.
118
Ibid., p46.
119
IOSH (2011), Work-related road safety: A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of interventions, Grayson, G. B., and Helman S., TRL, p8.
FOR EMPLOYERS:
Consider the possibility of employing fleet telematics as part of a comprehensive work-related road
risk management system that includes clear policies on key road safety issues.
Consider introducing a ‘telematics policy’ that outlines what is expected of employers and
employees.
120
ETSC (2018), Briefing: 5th EU Road Safety Action Programme 2020-2030, p13.
UK-based Martin Brower operates a dedicated supply Reading Buses, owned by Reading Borough Council in
chain for the restaurants of a major fast food chain. the UK, wanted to improve overall fuel consumption
Following a commitment to achieve environmental and reduce the amount spent on fuel. They opted
objectives, the company was keen to further reduce for a combination of telematics tools, including a
carbon emissions. fleet management system, an in-cab driving aid and
a mobile app which allows drivers direct access to
This led to the implementation of a fleet management their data. Implementation began in January 2015
solution with the aim of reducing carbon emissions and following a two-month benchmarking period
and optimising the utilisation of its fleet. It would also in February and March, the system went live in April
allow them to further improve the safety of drivers 2015.
and others in the community.
Reading Buses uses a colour coded system called RAG
A trial was conducted that included both new drivers reporting. This is used to identify at-risk drivers and
and drivers that had been driving for many years. coach them accordingly. Incidences of over-revving,
Following the trial it was realised that older drivers excessive idling, harsh braking and speeding are
in particular would benefit from re-education and categories with red for poor (R), amber for neutral
training to help them get the best from modern-day (A) and green for good (G). By studying these RAG
vehicles. reports, at-risk drivers can be easily identified.
By monitoring, recording and comparing the After 9 months Reading Buses reported a 27%
driving styles of staff, the telematics system used by reduction in harsh braking and a 44% reduction in
Martin Brower was employed alongside a targeted harsh acceleration across their fleet. Fuel consumption
driving training programme. This led to substantial also fell and there was a 35% increase in drivers
reductions in fuel consumption and fuel savings of meeting “green” driving standards.122
approximately 10%. The system has allowed fleet
managers to identify issues such as over-revving and
harsh acceleration and braking.
121
MiX Telematics (2009), Martin Brower Case Study
122
MiX Telematics (2016), Reading Buses Case Study
National Vehicle Distribution (NVD) is a family-owned Irish company providing outbound automotive logistics
services to car manufacturers and fleet operators. NVD use telematics monitoring in their fleet, with a focus
on safety, the environment and fuel efficiency. Driver scores obtained from the monitoring data are then
analysed and reported on a weekly basis.
The target score is 90% for 85% of all drivers, and this target increases year on year based on achieved
improvements. Scores are reviewed weekly and sent to all drivers. Driver supervisors follow-up to address any
concerning trends, and consistently high-performing drivers are acknowledged and can be rewarded.
Analysis of individual driver scores allow the company to be proactive and take preventive action on any
specific issues. NVD also monitor compliance with Driver Hours rules, with a target of 100% compliance.
Drivers must download their information on a weekly basis so that any infringements can be examined and
addressed quickly.
In 2017, NVD launched a new driver bonus linked to driver safety. A driver who has had no accidents or
incidents, no damage and a minimum driving score of 90% over a 12 month period can apply for an annual
bonus of 400 EUR. Driver scores are also used to inform incident investigation, by correlating historical scores
with any investigations.
Between 2014-2017 NVD’s Average Driver Performance score, produced using the telematics systems, has
increased from 86% in 2014 to 94% in 2017. NVD’s efforts to manage road risk, including the telematics
system, led to a reduction in driver churn from 51% in 2014 to 6% in 2017 and a drop in transport-related
collisions that resulted in time off from 12 in 2015 to just 2 in 2017.123
123
ETSC (2018), National Vehicle Distribution PRAISE Case Study
Eurogip, 2013, Statistical review of occupational injuries ETSC, 2016, Managing Grey Fleet Safety.
– France. https://goo.gl/6h2gz3 https://goo.gl/4NJm6M
European Commission, 2005, Causes and circumstances ETSC, 2016, Making Taxis Safer. https://goo.gl/ordYbC
of accidents at work in the EU.
ETSC, 2016, Reducing Casualties Involving Young
European Commission, 2006, Cost-benefit assessment Drivers and Riders in Europe. https://goo.gl/9aKVQW
and prioritisation of vehicle technologies.
https://goo.gl/2WbYyp ETSC 2017, PIN Flash Report 33: Tapping the Potential
for Reducing Work-Related Road Deaths and Injuries.
European Commission/European Road Safety https://goo.gl/npNZPE
Observatory (2009), SafetyNet: Work-related Road
Safety ETSC 2018, 12th Road Safety Performance Index
Report. https://goo.gl/eYxpi2
European Commission, Driving time and rest periods,
https://goo.gl/uEstKl Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 ETSC 2018, Briefing: 5th EU Road Safety Action
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 Programme 2020-2030. https://goo.gl/j2SjNP
February 2014 on tachographs in road transport on
ETSC, 2018, National Vehicle Distribution PRAISE Case
the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating
Study. https://goo.gl/YfNeEV
to road transport Text with EEA relevance, https://goo.
gl/9mj046 EU-OSHA, 2001, Factsheet on Preventing Road
Accidents involving Heavy Goods Vehicles.
ETSC, 2009, How Can In-vehicle Safety Equipment
https://goo.gl/e8ZPeH
Improve Road Safety at Work? https://goo.gl/5p81gY
EU OSHA, 2010, A review of accidents and injuries to
ETSC, 2010, Fitness to Drive. https://goo.gl/FA3eL7
road transport drivers. https://goo.gl/W65hyS
ETSC, 2010, Fit for Road safety: From Risk Assessment
Eurostat, Accidents at Work (ESAW, 2008 onwards),
to Training. https://goo.gl/AEp1Zw
https://goo.gl/tzh5yH
ETSC, 2010, Driving for Work: Minimising In-Vehicle
Health and Safety Executive (UK) 2014, Driving at Work:
Distraction. https://goo.gl/MUUewV
Managing Work-Related Road Safety.
ETSC, 2011, Driving for Work: Managing Speed. https://goo.gl/YDxqor
https://goo.gl/X9Yjbo
Hynd, D., McCharty, M., (2014) Study on the benefits
ETSC, 2011, Tackling Fatigue: EU Social Rules and heavy resulting from the installation of Event Data Recorders,
goods vehicle drivers. https://goo.gl/hMpqWy Transport Research Laboratory. https://goo.gl/DPMZ9p
ETSC, 2012, Work Related Road Safety Management IOSH 2016, Fatal Collisions on the road and safety and
Programmes. https://goo.gl/dxVKXU health. https://goo.gl/wcahEJ
ETSC, 2014, Managing the Road Risk of Van Fleets. IOSH, 2011, Work-related road safety: A systematic
https://goo.gl/M6qDym review of the literature on the effectiveness of
interventions, Grayson, G. B., and Helman S., TRL.
25 YEARS 1993-2018