User:SafariScribe
 | SafariScribe is busy attending to real life matters, although would later check few things on Wikipedia and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| Welcome | Scholar Archive | Pending changes | AFC help | WP Library |
| Newbie | NG | US | India | ENG | Scotland | Wales | [stat] |
|
ContactYou can leave me a message on my talk page.
|
Watchlist box
| XFD | N | N-1 | N-2 | N-3 | N-4 | N-5 | N-6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFD | |||||||
| CFD | |||||||
| TFD | |||||||
| DRV |
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 173.63.118.252 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:09, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 108.51.182.108 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 216.30.146.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:14, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:387:f:710e::22 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 154.181.214.40 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:56, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 31.166.8.248 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not jdjsjsh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:35, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 202.47.54.140 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 124.43.209.177 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Kazco (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:36, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 114.76.120.122 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:38, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2a02:8084:b43c:9000:28fe:b39f:4e12:3bed (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:20, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2a02:8084:b43c:9000:28fe:b39f:4e12:3bed (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 67.173.126.199 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:21, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 178.70.148.145 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- FP. PhilKnight (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- BosnianPoopy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 上官正义 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:58, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 178.130.115.229 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:08, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- 221.126.245.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:23, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Jh1096 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Adding decorative channel logo galleries to children's network articles; warning acknowledged with a 'I don't care' response, followed by a blanking. Nathannah • 📮 19:09, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Jh1096 is continuing to revert despite multiple warnings, including the removal of a page protection warning. Nathannah • 📮 20:42, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Sorry if this is not where to put this, but probable sock of 2601:18E:D004:BD40:F8B0:FAF8:1E8B:191 (contribs). GoldRomean (talk) 00:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- 100.4.145.46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Disruptive editing; addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:22, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Kylessan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. See also filter log. TLJ7863 (talk) 20:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 174.251.64.77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Has repeatedly vandalized, including at 24.47.140.42 and 82.79.210.15. Nswix (talk) 21:12, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Marvin Nmah (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. CSD G11 in 2022 at User:Marvin_Nmah, and now continued promotion-only edits at User_talk:Marvin_Nmah and Draft:Marvin Nmah. Referentis (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 172.250.35.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Eye Candy (album) (diff): vandalism after final warning. Binksternet (talk) 22:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 184.145.2.165 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:50, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 1 |
| Spam pages | 7 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 6 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 186 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Hakulamatatawhereismynames (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Heyheyheyitsfatalbertqiwi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Focs Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Peemwasu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Impersonating a notable living person. Peemwasu is a member of the Thai boy group BUS (group), though this is most likely to be a fan account. Paul_012 (talk) 15:48, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sboapp (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. TLJ7863 (talk) 17:33, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- See https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dsd.sboapp and the edit summaries of their deleted userpage. TLJ7863 (talk) 23:49, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- CHAAworld (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:AbuseLog/40897262. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:48, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- 0ctkit (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See userpage. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:50, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Garfield, Barbaro and Gleeson (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Has the appearance of being three individuals with a single account. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 22:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Longhornsg (talk) 02:03, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:33, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page has received months worth of vandalism from politically biased and unserious editors. As other editors attempt to remove the extraneous and erroneous "information," vandals return immediately to edit the page again and revert the changes. This page previously received temporary protection, and within days, the vandalism cycle has returned. Page clearly needs higher protection level, please. 2600:387:15:2C16:0:0:0:6 (talk) 02:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor continues to disregard previous RFC's on polling data by adding a non-polling Independent candidate to the info box. Along with additional information on said candidate in the body of the article. ThisUserIsTaken (talk) 05:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 21:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previous ECP expired 2 days ago, and currently having edit wars. Vestrian24Bio 12:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP-hopping LTA edits. Waxworker (talk) 12:40, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism since last page protection (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:69.161.24.138) User has already been given a final warning, and an explanation on their last IP, but obviously showed no interest in addressing it constructively. Loafiewa (talk) 12:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP-hopping LTA edits. Waxworker (talk) 12:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 13:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, WP:GSRUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 14:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:36, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, WP:GSRUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 14:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:36, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, WP:GSRUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 14:19, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, WP:GSRUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 14:19, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:13, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, WP:GSRUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:13, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, WP:GSRUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:14, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, WP:GSRUSUKR SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:14, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. »Gommeh 15:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive editing and possible sockpuppetry by new users/IPs. Page has been protected multiple times in the past due to these "new" users. Some1 (talk) 16:28, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Offline 00:01, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over budget and box office performance. – [ɑƞʈuɼeđ] [⍣] [⁂] 16:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- List of WWE pay-per-view and livestreaming supercards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistant addition of unsourced content. OZOO (t) (c) 17:31, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Many edits are being reverted due to vandalism; protecting the page for a couple of months should help alleviate the amount of vandalism/unsourced material. Ashwin060 (talk) 17:31, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Constant addition of unsourced material by IP. NacreousPuma855 (talk) 18:58, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persisistant IP vandal. ZimZalaBim talk 20:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Page is target of long-term abuser; serial socks active in May here [1][2][3]; [4]; [5]; [6]. Page is under WP:GS/PAGEANTS. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:35, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 23:49, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Persistent move of page despite violation of MOS:TM, WP:ON and MOS:MUSICCAPS (a.k.a., we don't match stylisation of artwork). livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:34, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:35, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 23:48, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism by IP users. IDB.S (talk) 23:52, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary Pending Changes Protection: Medium level of proudly sourced information; here is an example or poorly sourced information. PawPatroler (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Unprotection: This article has been semi-protected since 2012 due to apparent vandalism. Perhaps it's time to test whether long-term protection is still needed? While many popular television show articles (and sometimes, the list of episodes) are protected, I find it strange how the article for this show, which has gained over 3 times more views than this article in the past year (see here) is not protected, and doesn't see really much disruptive activity. The protection administrator hasn't been active since at least 2020. BriDash9000 (talk) 04:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- List of The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh episodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Unprotection: Similar to my unprotection request for the List of My Friends Tigger & Pooh episodes article, this has been semi-protected since 2012 due to apparent vandalism (and by the same administrator), and I think it's time to test whether long-term protection is still needed. The article for this show, like the My Friends Tigger & Pooh article, is not protected, and doesn't see really much disruptive activity, while also gaining nearly 3 times more views than this article (see here), so I'm not expecting this to receive a lot of disruption. BriDash9000 (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Max Schneider isn’t a huge name but his Wikipedia article has been "checked" protected since 2014, before he broke through as a singer. I would like to see this protection removed because vandalism is rare on this page. Frankster04 (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- "Vandalism is rare to this page" isn't a coherent argument. The 11-year protection, however, is one in and of itself. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page has been under indefinite semi-protection since May 2012. Around the time this was applied, dubstep as a music genre was hugely popular compared to now, and its influence within Internet circles, memes etc. back in the day may have made this article a much bigger target for drive-by vandalism then. Perhaps this is a case for WP:TRYUNPROT, where the semi-protection could be reduced to temporary pending changes if we really want to play it safe. Posting here directly as the protecting admin has been inactive for several years. Entranced98 (talk) 19:08, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There Are No Vandaliers
105.244.198.56 (talk) 21:11, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: It was pending changes protected in 2018, I doubt it's not needed anymore and there is not much vandalism by the way. 199.170.132.3 (talk) 23:22, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose:
"not much vandalism"
Pfft. Most of the edits this year alone have been continued vandalism and their reversions, some even today. Zinnober9 (talk) 23:32, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
add indian delegation sent to other coutries 152.56.17.42 (talk) 12:52, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- PPR request 152.56.17.42 (talk) 12:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:27, 25 May 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Kjansen86 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right.— MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)- @LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the
{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}with whichever user you're nominating. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC) - @LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hteiktinhein (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) At the pace this editor is creating, I would expect granting the flag to help reduce the backlog. These are solid articles; talk pages are created, which helps as well. I am AGF'ing on the Burmese language sources but have no concerns. @Hteiktinhein, a couple nits: on Padein Prince rebellion, the section of "Members" with an unexplained bulleted list is a bit confusing, and on Thetpan Mibaya, the "see also" section should go above the references section per MOS:LAYOUT. But these are just small things to keep in mind for the future. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Dclemens1971 Thank you very much for your kind comment on my contributions. I plan to continue creating more content related to Burmese history, especially topics that are still missing from the English Wikipedia.
- Although access to Wikipedia has been banned in Myanmar across all language versions, I am able to contribute using the ipblock-exempt right.
- Please don't worry about the Burmese-language sources — I have substantial knowledge of Burmese history, particularly the Konbaung era, and I have access to both online and offline versions of the Konbaung Chronicle and other historical texts. I appreciate your helpful notes regarding some minor issues in my articles, such as the structuring of See also sections and now fixed, and I'll certainly keep them in mind going forward. Best regards. Hteiktinhein (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, may I ask what the issue is? There doesn’t seem to be any problem on my side, and all the other users who applied at the same time have already been granted the rights. Why am I the only one delayed? Hteiktinhein (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @Hteiktinhein, I would like to know why you believe [7] is reliable? The website does not scream 'journalistic rigour' to me, but might be a subject-matter expert? More concerning, it seems some of the paragraphs in Areindama do not have citations. Could you commit to using inline citations for each paragraph?
- In terms of why it takes a while: some admins look at all the requests here, whereas others might only have a bit of time and look for requests in topic areas they're more familiar with, to quickly make a decision. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:36, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Femke 🐦, Thank you for your question. Of course, မြန်မာသံတော်ဆင့် (The Myanmar Herald) was a well-known and one of the oldest daily newspapers in Myanmar. I admit that some Myanmar newspapers have poor-quality digital publishing, which is partly due to the country being a developing nation.
- I understand that the website for The Myanmar Herald (https://myanmartandawsint.wordpress.com/) has a poor design and uses a free domain like WordPress. While the site has not been updated in a long time, it is still accessible. I'd also like to refer to this Myanmar Now article ([8]) for more details about the newspaper’s history and its legacy. However, I believe that using a free domain or having a simple web design does not mean the newspaper itself is not notable or reliable. We should not judge the reliability of a publication solely based on its web domain or appearance. So I don’t think that’s a valid concern.
- As for your other question — “It seems some of the paragraphs in the Areindama article do not have citations” — that's correct. I didn’t include citations in certain paragraphs:
- The introduction, because it is a summary.
- The quote paragraphs, because I didn’t want to insert citation tags (like [ ]) directly beside quotes. Instead, I placed a colon (":") above the quote to indicate the source was referenced in the sentence above.
- The analysis paragraph, because it is a general analysis based on facts already cited earlier in the article.
- If you’d like to verify anything, please feel free to ask other respected Burmese editors such as User:Htanaungg or User:EmeraldRange.
- Thanks again. Hteiktinhein (talk) 04:55, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Happy with the Herald. About the uncited paragraphs, those analysis paragraphs do need a citation to prevent the impression of WP:SYNTH. When you say it's analysis based on facts cited before: is that your analysis or one of the cited sources? Why not cite these sources? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 06:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Femke Thank you for your appreciation of my answer. Regarding the reference for the analysis section, please see Tin Naing Toe (2013), သမိုင်းအတွေး သမိုင်းအရေး, Lin Lun Khine, pp. 34–41, which was already cited in the origin section. According to the first half of page 41, historian Tin Naing Toe discusses the origin of the spear and argues that it is based on legend rather than historical fact. I believed that citing it in the origin section would suffice and unintentionally left it out of the analysis paragraph. I’ve now added it there as well, along with an additional reference for support.
- If you have any questions about my work, please feel free to ask. Thank you! Hteiktinhein (talk) 09:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Happy with the Herald. About the uncited paragraphs, those analysis paragraphs do need a citation to prevent the impression of WP:SYNTH. When you say it's analysis based on facts cited before: is that your analysis or one of the cited sources? Why not cite these sources? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 06:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, may I ask what the issue is? There doesn’t seem to be any problem on my side, and all the other users who applied at the same time have already been granted the rights. Why am I the only one delayed? Hteiktinhein (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Done for three months. Feel free to request indefinite AP a few weeks before the expiry. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- MerlinVtwelve (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Reviewed the last several articles, and while your grasp of notability is strong, I did find an instance of WP:CLOP on your most recent creation that is very close to the line of copyvio if not over it. See Copyvio Detector results. This article is otherwise very well done! Two other things to consider when creating articles: create talk pages (the WP:RATER tool is helpful here) and make sure at least one other page links to yours. If you were to be autopatrolled, orphaned pages would likely stay orphaned longer. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Dclemens1971thanks for the review!. I'll revisit those sections and re-word them. Will keep an eye on WP:CLOP and linked pages in future. Will check out WP:RATER also. Cheers, merlinVtwelve (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Not done. I believe you would still benefit from NPPers checking your work. Dianaaa noticed copyright issues a few years back as well, and the issues with the deleted White Lotus Conglomerate also lead me to believe another pair of eyes would be useful. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Dclemens1971thanks for the review!. I'll revisit those sections and re-word them. Will keep an eye on WP:CLOP and linked pages in future. Will check out WP:RATER also. Cheers, merlinVtwelve (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- BullDawg2021 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have started 300+ pages and have been editing for over three and a half years consistently. Early on, I struggled with notability, but I have since demonstrated an understanding for the notability guidelines. I would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks, Bulldawg (talk) 06:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Throughthemind (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created a large number of articles, all without any significant issues. Another user proposed on my talk page that I request to be Autopatrolled. Throughthemind (talk) 15:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- IvanScrooge98 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been around for 10 years. A new page reviewer (see here) encouraged me to request the autopatrolled rights over my page and redirect creation record. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
File mover
[edit]- Hinnk (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I've been doing a lot of file namespace work lately, and I've been doing a lot of multipart uploads ever since phab:T364644 got fixed for English Wikipedia, but occasionally I run into random server errors that leave the upload to a specific filename locked for some period of time. The only practical workarounds are to wait until the lock expires or retry under another filename and request a move, both of which leave me blocked for a while. I'd like to request file mover access so I can handle these cases myself, as a basic WP:FNC#1 move. hinnk (talk) 01:35, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Done initially for 3 months. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 04:21, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Polygnotus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I see a lot of typos in filenames and when fixing typos I normally skip them when they are in filenames. I don't expect to use it for anything but simple typofixes. See here. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- TheDoctorWho (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've found myself making semi-regular requests at WP:RM/TR (7 in the last two years, 13 overall). I feel like this is one of the things I could just handle myself instead of bothering others with, and could potentially help out with as I see fit. I don't currently plan on closing any RM discussions, but I am very familiar with WP:NCTV, which is my main topic area, that I rarely branch out out of, and the general policy laid out at WP:NC. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Macaw* (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I am requesting the pending changes reviewer right to help the project. I have read through all the relevant policys and have been patroling recent changes for a while now. If you have any questions feel free to ask me. Please ping me to notify me of comments or a decision here. Macaw* 17:59, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Scoria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to be granted the pending changes reviewer rights to combat potential vandalism. Scoria (talk) 13:32, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Destinyokhiria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello i would love to request pending changes reviewer to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Destinyokhiria (talk) 03:14, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 03:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- JamesEMonroe (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights:
To expand my tool belt as an extended confirmed recent changes patroller, and to more quickly afford new users their non policy breaking contribution. I have currently no sanctions against me and I think I understand wiki policy well enough for it. Thank you JamesEMonroe (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC) (Post edit) When using this perm, I will take extra care. I think I have met requirements in WP:PCCRITERIA and have reviewed Wikipedia policy. Also please consider older reverts as well or when I took the time to explain things to new users. JamesEMonroe (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- ExplorerofSpace (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting this right so that I can more easily revert vandalism. If you have looked at my user page, one of the main things I do is revert vandalism. This right, while not making it easier to do so, would give me a different way to do so. I think I have met requirements in WP:PCCRITERIA and have reviewed Wikipedia policy. My account is pretty new, but that is because I just got back into editing Wikipedia. I had an account when I lived in Chicago that had over a year experience. I could not longer access that account because I have forgotten the username and password. Again, I think this would be a good opportunity for me to do something I love in a different way. Whatever your decision is, thank you for considering. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had an account for 17 days. — MusikBot talk 20:20, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- WikiEditor5678910 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting pending changes reviewer rights so I can make good meaningful changes for Wikipedia on behalf of anonymous editors because they are the majority of editors and deserve a non-vandalism say in Wiki editing too. WikiEditor5678910 (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)Hi, WikiEditor5678910! The pcr permission doesn't mean that you are actually making edits on behalf of the IP editors. Using this permission you can accept revisions or revert them. You make edits on their behalf when they request it. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 06:28, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Arc Rev (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Skratata69 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights. Have undone multiple vandalism attempts on K. Chandrashekar Rao and Revanth Reddy. Having the rollback permission will be helpful to quickly revert multiple edits. Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Chippla360 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I will love to request for the rollback permission so I can help fight against vandalism and revert unconstructive edits, I’m also interested to use the wp:ANVDL tool to detect vandalism more easily. I believe meet the requirements and I took the feedbacks after my last request was declined over the last 1 month, I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes since then and I’m here again. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 06:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([10]). — MusikBot talk 06:50, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging Aoidh, @Pppery I’ll love your take, I’ve been waiting patiently too, I’ve improved over the last month and have been explaining reasons for my revert and warn editors. An admin should please evaluate my request so I can continue what I love doing. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 23:36, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- ArachnidInner (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hey there :3
I'm looking for rollback perms so I can speed up my vandal reversion by using tools such as huggle. I don't have any issues with RedWarn but my more experienced friends tell me that huggle is much nicer and faster to use. (Arachnid's userpage | what did I do now) 00:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- KnowDeath (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Rollback would make it easier for me to revert vandalism. KnowDeath (talk) 02:44, 19 May 2025 (UTC) KnowDeath (talk) 02:44, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- PunjabiEditor69 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I need rollback rights to revert vandalism. I have reverted some vandalism attempts. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 165 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 11:10, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have 216 edits now. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment): Hello, @PunjabiEditor69! I've checked your contributions was 16 undo edits and 444 namespace articles. I'm not ready to grant the permission. Next time you spend at least a month of experience patrolling; see Special:RecentChanges. Thanks! –HirowoWiki (📝) 10:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I will apply after at least 30 days of experience patrolling. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'm going to treat that as
Request withdrawn * Pppery * it has begun... 19:10, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'm going to treat that as
- Okay, I will apply after at least 30 days of experience patrolling. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment): Hello, @PunjabiEditor69! I've checked your contributions was 16 undo edits and 444 namespace articles. I'm not ready to grant the permission. Next time you spend at least a month of experience patrolling; see Special:RecentChanges. Thanks! –HirowoWiki (📝) 10:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have 216 edits now. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Shahin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I wish to receive rollback rights to use Wikipedia:Huggle, Wikipedia:AntiVandal and some others, with this permission I could revert vandalism so much faster. Shahin (talk) 10:08, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- VeritasVanguard (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I respectfully request the rollback right to enhance my anti-vandalism efforts on Wikipedia. My monitoring of recent changes has enabled me to effectively identify and revert disruptive edits. The rollback feature would increase the efficiency of my contributions and help maintain content integrity. I understand the responsibilities of this privilege and will adhere strictly to Wikipedia's guidelines. VeritasVanguard☎ 13:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([11]). — MusikBot talk 14:00, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Destinyokhiria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello admins, I’m requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work . Destinyokhiria (talk) 03:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([12]). — MusikBot talk 03:10, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Rjd0060 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Former admin user returning and would like the tool to better assist. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Randomly came here to check out the backlog and couldn't believe my eyes. Welcome back Ryan! Done Daniel (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Allfather (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
PUBLICSOCK of Benison (talk · contribs · count · logs). Would like to have ECP, pending changes and rollback for this account. Thanks.— Allfather (Benison) (talk) 13:22, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot talk 13:30, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 3 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 13:30, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Done * Pppery * it has begun... 19:09, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- ExplorerofSpace (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I recently made a request and they prompted me to spend more time on Recent Changes. I have spent more time and am requesting it again. I am requesting this to ease my job of reverting vandalism, especially at night when the IP's make a nuisance of Wikipedia. I have read Wikipedia policies, and think I have almost or have met the requirements listed for Rollback rights. Whatever your decision is, thank you. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 15:12, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([13]). — MusikBot talk 15:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Please re-read the header - your account isn't even a month old yet. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:12, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- I am aware, but as I said in the previous request, I have had an account with over a year experience. The reason I could not access that is because I forgot the username and password. Also, my edits have never been reverted except when I was linking some words that were "common"; I have also like suggested in the last request reviewed recent changes for some more time. Is this enough to get the right? Thanks for your help. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 21:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately we have no way of proving that (anyone could make such a claim) and hence must only evaluate the edits you've made on this account when evaluating permission requests. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for explaining that to me. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 11:04, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately we have no way of proving that (anyone could make such a claim) and hence must only evaluate the edits you've made on this account when evaluating permission requests. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- I am aware, but as I said in the previous request, I have had an account with over a year experience. The reason I could not access that is because I forgot the username and password. Also, my edits have never been reverted except when I was linking some words that were "common"; I have also like suggested in the last request reviewed recent changes for some more time. Is this enough to get the right? Thanks for your help. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 21:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- MalborkHistorian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello wikipedians! i would really love to ask if i can get permissions for rollback rights!
My reason for requesting rollback rights: I want to revert as much vandalism as i could find in articles and userpages, Which obviously won't be an easy task considering the fact that i reverted vandalism at least 4 times, next thing that i want to revert are unconstructive edits, which also won't be an easy task considering the fact that both of these things are really hard to find without using bots
That's all for now, i hope my request gets accepted, if so then Thanks! 𝕸𝖆𝖑𝖇𝖔𝖗𝖐𝕳𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓𝕿𝖆𝖑𝖐 15:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Too little experience in this area. Please spend some time reverting vandalism using tools that don't require rollback rights (WP:Twinkle and WP:RedWarn, for example), and only then request the permission. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:07, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Traumnovelle (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting removal. I applied to use mass-rollback to deal with an LTA but I haven't encountered this LTA since and have no use for the tool. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:29, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "rollbacker" user right. — MusikBot talk 21:30, 24 May 2025 (UTC)- Revoked * Pppery * it has begun... 00:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Skovhund (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As I don’t often edit during the work week, I’ve become a semi-frequent RecentChanges patroller. Requesting permission to expand capabilities of RVV, including scripts such as massRollback. skovhund talk 01:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
- Wikipedia good article contributors
- Wikipedians willing to provide third opinions
- Wikipedians who have access to a university library
- WikiProject Nigeria participants
- WikiProject Africa participants
- American Wikipedians
- Wikipedians in the Welcoming Committee
- Wikipedian recent changes patrollers
- Wikipedians who use AutoWikiBrowser
- Wikipedians who use Discord