  |
名前を隠して楽しく日記。
鬼頭はるか
はるかは、ストーリー構造上“主人公と同等の軸を持つメインキャラ”です。
キャラクター造形としては、
• 自身の創作（漫画）を巡る苦悩という“都市的若者の物語線”
つまり、物語を動かす原動力にも、物語に振り回される被害者にもなり得る二重構造を持つキャラとなっている。
この点で、角乃の「観察者」とは対照的に、
だから、ちゃんと性病対策してる風俗のお店が必要なんでしょーが、このまま売買春禁止になったらますます危険になりますよ。売買春自体を断つのは無理だって
買いたい男と売りたい女がいるんだから
一河角乃
• 事件に巻き込まれるが、ドンブラザーズのコアメンバーではない
• ドラマ性：普通の人が超常にどう接するか、という対比のための存在
Windows11別にゴミではなく後方互換性神OSなんで25年前のソフトが動くんや神すぎ文句言う前に真っ当に設定してstartallbackを買って入れたらええ、M1MACもなんであんな値段でなんであんな快適動作する？神、SteamOSもスタンバイ復帰しやすくて神、神はたくさんいたほうがええ全部同時に利用せよ
例えば、アメリカ、台湾、その他関係諸国に粛々と根回しして、いろんな状況に対して具体的なプランを策定して、それらプランのパッケージを連携して実行する確約が取れたうえで、満を持しての発言だったなら拍手喝采ものだったのだがな。
もちろん実際にはまるで根回しもなく、その場で思い付きの持論を独断専行でぶちまけたもんだから、中国には内政干渉だとキレられ、トランプには「お前友だちじゃないし」とそっぽを向かれ、立つ瀬もなく、無駄に状況を悪化させただけだったわけだ。
外交音痴は誰かって？第一には高市であり、第二には、そんな高市をエクストリーム擁護してる輩だろ。
中国との関係が悪くなって日本の経済状況が悪くなったとしても仕方ない。
戦争が起こるよりまし。
実際に戦争が起きたとしたら？ まあ普通に中国のせいになるよね。
いや、高市が首相になる前から中国は台湾侵攻やる気満々だったから！
高市が釘を差しても中国が侵攻するなら誰が何を言っても侵攻するだろうに。
なぜ日本リベラルは中国の台湾侵攻（の意思）を非難しないんだろうな。
モスやマクドナルドで、フードコートの給水機向けの紙コップで赤ワインが提供されたら相当売れるのではないか。
あのチープな紙コップでクイっとキメるだけで何倍もバーガーが美味くなると思うんだよ。
NAZO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://worldjpn.net/documents/texts/docs/19500112.S1E.html
This defensive perimeter runs along the Aleutians to Japan and then goes to the Ryukyus
Military Security in the Pacific
Now, let's in the light of that consider some of thee policies. First of all, let's deal with the question of military security. I deal with it first because it is important and because, having stated our policy in that regard, we must clearly understand that the military menace is not the most immediate.
What is the situation in regard to the military security of the Pacific area, and what is our policy in regard to it?
In the first place, the defeat and the disarmament of Japan has placed upon the United States the necessity of assuming the military defense of Japan so long as that is required, both in the interest of our security and in the interests of the security of the entire Pacific area and, in all honor, in the interest of Japanese security. We have American -- and there are Australian -- troops in Japan. I am not in a position to speak for the Australians, but I can assure you that there is no intention of any sort of abandoning or weakening the defenses of Japan and that whatever arrangements are to be made either through permanent settlement or otherwise, that defense must and shall be maintained.
This defensive perimeter runs along the Aleutians to Japan and then goes to the Ryukyus. We hold important defense positions in the Ryukyu Islands, and those we will continue to hold. In the interest of the population of the Ryukyu Islands, we will at an appropriate time offer to hold these islands under trusteeship of the United Nations. But they are essential parts of the defensive perimeter of the Pacific, and they must and will be held.
The defensive perimeter runs from the Ryukyus to the Philippine Islands. Our relations, our defensive relations with the Philippines are contained in agreements between us. Those agreements are being loyally carried out and will be loyally carried out. Both peoples have learned by bitter experience the vital connections between our mutual defense requirements. We are in no doubt about that, and it is hardly necessary for me to say an attack on the Philippines could not and would not be tolerated by the United States. But I hasten to add that no one perceives the imminence of any such attack.
So far as the military security of other areas in the Pacific is concerned, it must be clear that no person can guarantee these areas against military attack. But it must also be clear that such a guarantee is hardly sensible or necessary within the realm of practical relationship.
Should such an attack occur -- one hesitates to say where such an armed attack could come from -- the initial reliance must be on the people attacked to resist it and then upon the commitments of the entire civilized world under the Charter of the United Nations which so far has not proved a weak reed to lean on by any people who are determined to protect their independence against outside aggression. But it is a mistake, I think, in considering Pacific and Far Eastern problems to become obsessed with military considerations. Important as they are, there are other problems that press, and these other problems are not capable of solution through military means. These other problems arise out of the susceptibility of many areas, and many countries in the Pacific area, to subversion and penetration. That cannot be stopped by military means.
17
