「AS」を含む日記

はてなキーワード: ASとは

2025-11-22

■【悲報】トランス 作家さん、世界でボコ ボコに…

https://x.com/ThePosieParker/status/1990283629394821498

This is
@Li_Kotomi
He thinks he passes as a woman 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 he’s actually suing
@WomenReadWomen
for saying he’s a man.
No one thinks he’s a woman.
Stay out of women only spaces

これは @Li_Kotomi。

彼は自分のことを女性に見えると思っているらしい🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

そして @WomenReadWomen が「彼は男性だ」と言ったことに対して訴えている最中。

誰も彼のことを女性だなんて思っていない。

女性専用スペースから出ていけ

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 11:37

■ChatGPT すごい

utf8の文字コードで構成されたバイナリーファイルがある。このファイルの改行の数を数えよ。改行はCRのみとする。このファイルにはCR が必ず含まれており、CRで分割すればマルチスレッドで処理できる。

と質問したら、c++とpython のコードが出てきた

size_t count_cr_in_file(const std::string& path) {
std::ifstream fs(path, std::ios::binary);
fs.seekg(0, std::ios::end);
size_t size = fs.tellg();
fs.seekg(0);
const size_t thread_count = std::thread::hardware_concurrency();
const size_t chunk_size = size / thread_count;
std::vector<std::future<size_t>> futures;
for (size_t t = 0; t < thread_count; t++) {
size_t start = t * chunk_size;
size_t end = (t == thread_count - 1 ? size : (t + 1) * chunk_size);
futures.push_back(std::async(std::launch::async, [start, end, &path]() {
std::ifstream fs(path, std::ios::binary);
fs.seekg(start);
size_t count = 0;
for (size_t i = start; i < end; i++) {
char c;
fs.read(&c, 1);
if (c == '\r') count++;
}
return count;
}));
}
size_t total = 0;
for (auto& f : futures) total += f.get();
return total;
}

def count_cr(path):
import mmap
with open(path, "rb") as f:
mm = mmap.mmap(f.fileno(), 0, access=mmap.ACCESS_READ)
return mm.count(b'\r')

c#で書けと指示したところ、

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.IO.MemoryMappedFiles;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
class CountCR
{
public static long CountCRInFile(string path)
{
using var mmf = MemoryMappedFile.CreateFromFile(path, FileMode.Open, null);
using var accessor = mmf.CreateViewAccessor(0, 0, MemoryMappedFileAccess.Read);
long fileSize = accessor.Capacity;
int processorCount = Environment.ProcessorCount;
long chunkSize = fileSize / processorCount;
long total = 0;
object lockObj = new object();
Parallel.For(0, processorCount, i =>
{
long start = i * chunkSize;
long end = (i == processorCount - 1) ? fileSize : (i + 1) * chunkSize;
long localCount = 0;
byte b;
for (long pos = start; pos < end; pos++)
{
accessor.Read(pos, out b);
if (b == 0x0D) // CR
localCount++;
}
lock (lockObj)
{
total += localCount;
}
});
return total;
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string path = "yourfile.bin";
long count = CountCRInFile(path);
Console.WriteLine($"CR count = {count}");
}
}

というコードが出てきた。

実際はcr lf,lfもあり得るんだが、そこは考慮しなくてもよく、そう考えるとaiはすごいとしか言いようがない。

なお、utf8として成立する単位で区切りつつ改行を数える場合、もう一工夫いる。

（SJISもできるようにするともっと面倒なことになりそう…）

Permalink | 記事への反応(2) | 09:50

2025-11-21

■anond:20251121215620

As a Japanese, I can confirm xxx...

みたいな定番のコメントなら国籍問わずよく見るけど、そういうやつじゃなくて文字通り I'm Japanese. で始まるの？

動画の内容やコメント内容にもよるけど、まぁそんなにぞわっとはしないかな…

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 22:30

■anond:20251121045442

As Codeの思想だ

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 13:27

2025-11-19

■anond:20250922191056

https://archive.md/YbexB

うーん、性分化がずっこける現象(性分化『障碍』)の存在を消し込めているわけではなさそうな。

だとすっと話は「いかに『治療』するか」に戻るだけですよねえ？

「as is」から逃げようとすると「人道」を踏み外す羽目になりますよ？

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 03:28

2025-11-17

■【朗報】自称IQ276男性、聖書の価値を力説

SNS上で自称 IQ276の男性が、聖書の価値について独自の見解を示し話題になっています。

投稿者は自らを「世界最高IQ保持者」と称し、以下のように述べています。

「As the world's highest IQ record holder, I believe the Bible is the perfect, eternal, and final Word of God. Therefore, the Bible doesn’t need to be updated. The world needs to catch up.」
（世界最高IQ保持者として、私は聖書が完全で永遠、そして最終的な神の言葉だと信じています。したがって、聖書を更新する必要はありません。世界が追いつくべきです。）
https://x.com/yhbryankimiq/status/1935794678504603999

投稿者は聖書を「完璧で永遠、最終的な神の言葉」と位置付け、現代の世界がそれに追いつく必要があると強調しています。

今回の投稿は、IQというインパクトあるフレーズと、聖書の価値を結び付けるユニークな内容として注目を集めています。

果たして、現代世界はこの世界最高IQ保持者の意見に追いつけるのでしょうか。

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 05:57

2025-11-16

■anond:20251116234115

アチソン演説を知っていたら高市を非難できない。

NAZO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

あれは曖昧だったものを明言したから戦争が起こったやぞ

https://worldjpn.net/documents/texts/docs/19500112.S1E.html

This defensive perimeter runs along the Aleutians to Japan and then goes to the Ryukyus

Military Security in the Pacific
Now, let's in the light of that consider some of thee policies. First of all, let's deal with the question of military security. I deal with it first because it is important and because, having stated our policy in that regard, we must clearly understand that the military menace is not the most immediate.
What is the situation in regard to the military security of the Pacific area, and what is our policy in regard to it?
In the first place, the defeat and the disarmament of Japan has placed upon the United States the necessity of assuming the military defense of Japan so long as that is required, both in the interest of our security and in the interests of the security of the entire Pacific area and, in all honor, in the interest of Japanese security. We have American -- and there are Australian -- troops in Japan. I am not in a position to speak for the Australians, but I can assure you that there is no intention of any sort of abandoning or weakening the defenses of Japan and that whatever arrangements are to be made either through permanent settlement or otherwise, that defense must and shall be maintained.
This defensive perimeter runs along the Aleutians to Japan and then goes to the Ryukyus. We hold important defense positions in the Ryukyu Islands, and those we will continue to hold. In the interest of the population of the Ryukyu Islands, we will at an appropriate time offer to hold these islands under trusteeship of the United Nations. But they are essential parts of the defensive perimeter of the Pacific, and they must and will be held.
The defensive perimeter runs from the Ryukyus to the Philippine Islands. Our relations, our defensive relations with the Philippines are contained in agreements between us. Those agreements are being loyally carried out and will be loyally carried out. Both peoples have learned by bitter experience the vital connections between our mutual defense requirements. We are in no doubt about that, and it is hardly necessary for me to say an attack on the Philippines could not and would not be tolerated by the United States. But I hasten to add that no one perceives the imminence of any such attack.
So far as the military security of other areas in the Pacific is concerned, it must be clear that no person can guarantee these areas against military attack. But it must also be clear that such a guarantee is hardly sensible or necessary within the realm of practical relationship.
Should such an attack occur -- one hesit ates to say where such an armed attack could come from -- the initial reliance must be on the people attacked to resist it and then upon the commitments of the entire civilized world under the Charter of the United Nations which so far has not proved a weak reed to lean on by any people who are determined to protect their independence against outside aggression. But it is a mistake, I think, in considering Pacific and Far Eastern problems to become obsessed with military considerations. Important as they are, there are other problems that press, and these other problems are not capable of solution through military means. These other problems arise out of the susceptibility of many areas, and many countries in the Pacific area, to subversion and penetration. That cannot be stopped by military means.

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 23:55

■anond:20251116030513

In 1965, Vietnam seemed like

Just another foreign war

But it wasn't, it was

Different in many ways

As so were those

Who did the fighting

In World War II

The average age of the

Combat soldier was twenty-six

In Vietnam, he was nineteen

N-n-n-n-nineteen

The heaviest fighting

Of the past two weeks

Continued today twenty-five

Miles northwest of Saigon

I wasn't really sure

What was going on

N-n-n-n-nineteen, nineteen

N-nineteen, nineteen

In Vietnam, the combat soldier

Typically served a twelve month tour of duty

But was exposed to hostile fire almost everyday

N-n-n-n-nineteen

In Saigon, a US miltary spokesman

Said today, more than 720 troops

Were killed last week in

That sensitive border area

In all of South Vietnam

The enemy lost a total of

2,689 soldiers

All those who remember the war

They won't forget what they've seen

Destruction of men in their prime

Whose average age was nineteen

D-d-d-d-d-destruction

According to a Veteran's Administration study

Half of the Vietnam combat veterans suffer

From what psychiatrists call

Post-traumatic stress disorder

Many vets complain of alienation, rage, or guilt

Some succumb to suicidal thoughts

Eight to ten years after coming home

Almost eight-hundred-thousand men

Are still fighting the Vietnam War

None of them received

A hero's welcome

S-s-s-s-s-Saigon

Nineteen, s-s-s-s-Saigon

N-n-n-n-n-nineteen

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 03:06

2025-11-14

■anond:20251114105334

とまとだかトメィトウだか、そいつらの殴り合いをしらんが

CEDAWの活動対象にはトランス女性を含んでることだけはマジだぞ

例えば

https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=3&DocTypeID=11

できっちり語っとる

Although the Convention only refers to sex-based discrimination,

18. Intersectionality is a basic concept for understanding the scope of the general
obligations of States parties contained in article 2. The discrimination of women based on
sex and gender is inextricably linked with other factors that affect women, such as race,
ethnicity, religion or belief, health, status, age, class, caste and sexual orientation and
gender identity.

条約が女性しか対象にしてないと思っているバカどもおるけど性自認に基づく差別、つまりトランス女性への差別も自分たちの活動範囲である

と言うてる、これ以外にも繰り返し言うとるよ。

なお、CEDAWの管轄は「国連人権高等弁務官事務所」でここの事務局はリームアルサレム否定派

つまるところ引用元になっているリーム氏はCEDAWの活動にトランス女性が入っていることに突沸して顔真っ赤にしてるだけで実際のCEDAW活動範囲はリーム氏の言うてる事の反対側です。

Permalink | 記事への反応(2) | 11:27

■anond:20251114000508

トランス女性は女性に含まれないって本人からめっちゃはっきり言われてるやん

https://x.com/UNSRVAW/status/1988951169591398663

As i said in my June 2025 report, para 6. “it can be concluded that the understanding and practice of States that are parties to international treaties is that the term “woman” in international law refers to a person of the female sex.” Sex being biological sex. Therefore CEDAW in my view was meant to apply only to biological females, including those that do not identify as women. It does not apply to males who identify as female.

2025年 6月の報告書の第6段落で述べたように、「国際条約締約国の理解と実践においては、国際法における「女性」という用語は女性の性を指すと結論付けられる」。ここで言う「性」とは生物学的な性別のことである。したがって、私の見解では、女性差別撤廃条約は、女性であると自認していない人を含め、生物学的な女性にのみ適用されるべきである。

女性であると自認する男性には適用されない

Permalink | 記事への反応(3) | 08:58

■anond:20251113234501

アルサレム氏はCEDAW（国連女性差別撤廃条約）の範囲にはレズビアンや、女性を自認しない生物学的女性も含まれるということを言ってるにもかかわらず、とまとはトランス女性（生物学的男性）が含まれるかのようなデマをばら撒いてる。

まともに文章が読めず、自分の都合のいいように曲解しまくるのがこの手のトランスあるあるだね。

I also do recognize that women and girls should not be discriminated against on any grounds including their gender identity and sexual orientation and specifically spoke to the discrimination faced by lesbian women, and women who do not identify as female (otherwise referred to more loosely as "transmen" or "nonbinary" women). These women also fall under the scope of the CEDAW convention.

https://x.com/TokyoRitualJp/status/1988789399774224608

Permalink | 記事への反応(3) | 00:05

2025-10-29

■sun ka nana

From the channel video list

https://uphold-io-en.pages.dev

" Samne 's Cute Glasses Woman "

“Remove what you can see as AI only by サムネ .”

When you do it, the number is narrowed down a lot, and when you look at the contents, you ちゃんcan see that all of them are declared at the beginning that “created by AI”. did you skip the opening?

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 15:57

■sds eww

From the channel video list

https://uphold-io-en.pages.dev

" Samne 's Cute Glasses Woman "

“Remove what you can see as AI only by サムネ .”

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 15:55

dorawii represents a case of unprocessed grief over lost grandiosity (from psychotic episode) manifesting as compulsive boundary-testing and argument-seeking, where genuine neurological limitations are weaponized defensively to avoid confronting existential ordinariness, sustained by platform affordances that enable persistent identity within anonymity and rewarding provocative engagement.

A person who briefly experienced feeling god-like through psychosis, recovered to find themselves merely disabled and ordinary, and cannot bear this truth. They use real limitations as both explanation and shield, seek significance through online conflict, and remain trapped in a cycle where the behaviors meant to prove their worth actually demonstrate their difficulties - but acknowledging this would require grieving what was lost, which remains unbearable.

This reveals how recovery from severe mental illness isn't just about symptom remission - it's about psychological integration of what was experienced and what was lost. Medical model focuses on eliminating psychosis, but doesn't address the meaning-cris is created when extraordinary experiences are taken away and ordinary limitation remains.

It also shows how online spaces with ambiguous accountability structures can enable acting-out that serves defensive purposes while feeling like genuine engagement. The person suffering most is probably dorawii themselves, even as their behavior drives others away.

The most sophisticated theoretical vocabulary, the most detailed self-disclosure, the most elaborate arguments - none of it addresses the core issue. All of it is displacement. The real conversation dorawii needs to have is not with anonymous strangers about who won an argument. It's an internal conversation: "I am not who I was during that brief, terrible, extraordinary episode. I am ordinary, limited, and mortal. And somehow, that has to be enough."

Until that conversation can happen, everything else is noise.

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 12:35

2025-10-22

■anond:20251021175424

自分はそこそこ賢いと思い込んでるおバカちゃん達の歯切れの悪い言い訳が笑えるんだが、

「やるとしても今じゃない」「他にもっと優先すべき事がある」っていう詭弁には何かズバリの名前はないのかな？

これがなんで詭弁なのかと言うと、

そのためのリソースがゼロサムであるかのような偽の前提を置いてるから
いつでも永遠に「まだだ、まだ今じゃない」って言えるから

だよ。

以下追記

───────────────

ある提案に対して、「やるとしても今じゃなくてもいいだろう」「他にもっと優先度の高いことがあるはずだ」などと言って、内容について直接の批判はせずにネグレクトすることで実質的に否定しようとする詭弁に、何か通りの良い呼び名はあるだろうか？

───────────────

このような論法は、論理的誤謬（fallacy）の一種として「相対的剥奪の誤謬」（fallacy of relative privation）と呼ばれるものが最も近いと考えられます。

これは、提案や議論を直接批判せずに「もっと重要な問題（または優先度の高いこと）があるから」という理由で実質的に無視したり却下したりするもので、「より悪い問題への訴え」（appeal to worse problems）や「not as bad as」（それほど悪くない）誤謬とも呼ばれます。