  |
はてなキーワード: commonとは
In Japanese “ふるさと”(furusato) means not only his born or grown town but also countryside or nostalgic town. Does the word “hometown” have same meanings?
Great question! You're absolutely right that the Japanese word 「ふるさと」(furusato) carries rich emotional and cultural connotations. It can mean:
In contrast, the English word “hometown” is more limited in meaning. It typically refers to:
It does not usually carry the same emotional or nostalgic depth as 「ふるさと」. For example, “hometown” doesn’t naturally evoke images of countryside, nature, or childhood memories unless additional context is given.
If you want to express the broader, more emotional meaning of 「ふるさと」 in English, you might use phrases like:
Would you like help translating a specific sentence or concept involving 「ふるさと」 into natural English?
今の回答を日本語に訳して
⸻
ご質問ありがとうございます！ おっしゃる通り、日本語の「ふるさと」には豊かな感情や文化的な意味が込められています。具体的には：
一方で、英語の “hometown” はもう少し限定的な意味しか持ちません。通常は：
そして、「hometown」は「ふるさと」のように、田舎の風景や郷愁、自然とのつながりなどを自然に連想させる言葉ではありません。感情的・文化的な深みは、文脈を加えないと伝わりにくいです。
「ふるさと」の広くて感情的な意味を英語で表現したい場合は、以下のような表現が使えます：
⸻
昨日一番肝心なファイルなのにURLとみなされる部分が多いことの関係で投稿できなかったのでそれを小分けにして書く。
小分けというか例のスパムの影響でNGワードに引っかかっていたようなのでそこだけ書き換えた。
suuportと書いていある部分は元のコードでは当然uが一つ少ないので利用するときはそうすること。
from selenium import webdriver
from selenium.webdriver.chrome.options import Options
from selenium.webdriver.chrome.service import Service
from webdriver_manager.chrome import ChromeDriverManager # ← 追加
from selenium.webdriver.common.by import By
from selenium.webdriver.suupport.ui import WebDriverWait
from selenium.webdriver.suupport import expected_conditions as EC
import time, json
from selenium.common.exceptions import TimeoutException
class HatenaClient:
def __init__(self, username, password):
self.username = username
self.password = password
self.driver = None
def start_browser(self):
options = Options()
options.set_capability("goog:loggingPrefs", {"browser": "ALL"})
options.add_argument("--headless=new") # 開発中は消してよい
options.add_argument("--disable-gpu")
# ✅ webdriver-manager を使って ChromeDriver を自動取得・設定
service = Service(ChromeDriverManager().install())
self.driver = webdriver.Chrome(service=service, options=options)
def login(self):
self.driver.get("https://b.hatena.ne.jp/my")
print(self.driver.current_url)
self.driver.get("https://www.hatena.ne.jp/login")
time.sleep(2)
self.driver.find_element(By.NAME, "username").send_keys(self.username)
self.driver.find_element(By.NAME, "password").send_keys(self.password)
self.driver.find_element(By.XPATH, "//button[contains(text(), 'ログイン')]").click()
WebDriverWait(self.driver, 10).until(lambda d: "my" in d.current_url or "login" not in d.current_url)
if "passkeys" in self.driver.current_url:
self.driver.get("https://b.hatena.ne.jp/my")
print(self.driver.current_url)
print(self.driver.title)
return "dorawii" in self.driver.current_url
def add_bookmark(self, target_url):
self.driver.get(f"https://b.hatena.ne.jp/{self.username}/add.confirm?url={target_url}")
time.sleep(2)
try:
# コメントがあれば入力
comment_box = self.driver.find_element(By.CSS_SELECTOR, "textarea.bookmarkadd-comment-form")
comment_box.clear()
comment_box.send_keys("わしが書いた")
# 登録ボタンを押す
save_button = self.driver.find_element(By.CSS_SELECTOR, "input.bookmarkadd-submit-btn")
save_button.click()
time.sleep(2)
return True
except Exception as e:
print(f"Bookmark failed: {e}")
return False
def quit(self):
self.driver.quit()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250822131958#
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaKfv9AAKCRBwMdsubs4+
SE26AQCkpJE4RdUbFIDIJjOunjFYRQ34zdS1cqV7IX277S7IPAEAshVE/rD8Ggcr
9UKo5yOY6GNrHGYJJtYTYkn3cySu6AA=
=E4vq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
https://chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/search?p=chanceman.work&fr=common-navi
特定のドメインをキーワードに検索するとほとんど同じ回答者の投稿がヒット。
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250813174843# -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaJxRbQAKCRBwMdsubs4+ SIjzAQC6c3qGGurVL/QKWdWfuxkq0RZsoQ9rdIFqJH/fLM9f3gEAuorROoYujFsP 7Q0ksHkaoI2+Jw2fmB5Yw899FRfgSQk= =q1Oz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
グライス流仄めかし（Gricean insinuation）は、**話し手が論争の的となる内容を会話に導入しつつ、それを公式には述べていないと同時に示す**ことで、二つの目標を達成するコミュニケーション行為です [1]。これにより、話し手は異議を唱えられた際に、**その暗示されたメッセージに対する意図を plausibly deny（もっともらしく否定）できる**という特徴があります [1]。
筆者は、グライス流仄めかしを「**部分的に公然（partially overt）であり、かつ部分的に隠然（partially covert）であるコミュニケーション**」と定義しています [1-3]。つまり、その背後にある意図は認識されることを意図していますが、それが認識されることを意図されていると認識されることは意図されていません [3, 4]。
このグライス流仄めかしが心理的にもっともらしい否定可能性を維持するために利用するメカニズムが、**フェイク一方通行鏡効果（Fake One-Way Mirror Effect）**です [2, 5-7]。この効果は、**話し手が自分の意図が聞き手に認識されるかどうかについて無関心を装う**ことで生じます [5, 8, 9]。
フェイク一方通行鏡効果の例と、それがグライス流仄めかしにどう関わるかについて説明します。
この効果は、**話し手の意図の反復的な構造（(SM2)で示されるような無限の連鎖）や、会話の文脈が更新される際の共通信念（common belief）の反復的な構造を途絶させる**ことで生じます [10-15]。話し手は、聞き手が自分の意図を認識することを意図しているという事実を、聞き手が認識しないように仕向けます [11, 13, 15-17]。
### 具体例
1. **「仕草でばれる笑顔（Giveaway Smile）」のシナリオ** [16, 18]
* **状況**: アン（社員）がピーター（上司）とブリッジをしています。アンはピーターに勝ってほしいし、そのことをピーターに知ってほしいと思っていますが、露骨にはしたくありません [16, 18]。
* **行動**: アンは、良い手札のときに自発的な喜びの笑顔を装います [16, 18]。この笑顔は、ピーターに「アンが良い手札を持っている」と信じさせることを意図して作られています。アンはピーターがこの意図（i1）を認識することを意図しています（i2） [16, 18, 19]。
* **フェイク一方通行鏡効果**: しかし、アンはピーターが「彼女の笑顔が、彼に自分の手札が良いと信じさせようとする意図をもって行われている」という彼女の意図（i2）を認識することを隠したいと思っています [16, 18]。つまり、彼女はピーターに、彼女の笑顔が彼に良い手札があると信じさせる意図（i1）をもって作られたことを認識させたいが、その意図（i1）が公然であること、ひいては彼女の笑顔が「伝える」行為であることを彼に認識させたくありません [16, 18]。
* **結果**: アンは、ピーターが自分の演技された笑顔が、彼に良い手札があると信じさせる意図（i1）をもって行われたことを認識することを意図しているという彼女の意図（i2）を、ピーターが認識しないようにします（i4'） [11, 16]。これにより、アンは「良い手札があることを伝えた」という責任を回避できる、**心理的にもっともらしい否定可能性**を維持します [6, 19]。ピーターはアンの意図を認識しますが、その意図が公然であるかどうかについて不確かなままです [6]。
2. **サリーとハリー、ジョンとマリアのシナリオ（修正版）** [13, 20-22]
* **状況**: サリーとハリーがベンチに座っていると、ジョンがバスから降りてくるのを見かけます。サリーは「今週、マリアの家の近くのバス停でジョンがバスから降りるのを見たのはこれで3回目だわ」と言います（発話 (3)） [20, 22]。
* **グライス流仄めかし**: サリーは、ジョンとマリアが不倫関係にあることを仄めかそうと意図しています（Q） [13, 21]。
* **フェイク一方通行鏡効果**: サリーは、ハリーがジョンとマリアが不倫関係にあると信じること（i1）を意図していることを、ハリーが認識すること（i2）を意図しているかのように振る舞いつつも、**その意図（i2）が満たされているかどうかに無関心を装います** [8, 9]。
* **結果**: サリーのこの「無関心のふり」は、会話におけるフェイク一方通行鏡として機能します [8, 9]。これにより、ハリーはサリーがQを伝えようとしていることを理解する一方で、サリーがその意図（i1）を認識することを意図しているかどうかについて不確かなままになります（i4'が満たされる） [9, 13, 15, 17]。この不確かさにより、サリーは「Qを伝えようとした意図はなかった」と**もっともらしく否定できる**立場に置かれるのです [7, 9, 17]。
3. **クラブでの喫煙者とFのシナリオ（修正版）** [23, 24]
* **状況**: Fと恋人のOがクラブの列に並んでおり、後ろに喫煙者がいます。FはOがタバコを持っていないことを知っていますが、Oに「ああ、タバコが一本あればな。何か持ってる？」と言います [23]。
* **グライス流仄めかし**: Fは、Oに話しかけることで、後ろの喫煙者にタバコを差し出すように促すことを意図しています [23-25]。
* **フェイク一方通行鏡効果**: Fは、喫煙者が、彼がタバコを要求する意図（i1）をもって発話していることを認識すること（i2）について、**無関心を装います** [24, 25]。
* **結果**: この「無関心のふり」により、Fは会話的なフェイク一方通行鏡効果を生み出します [25]。これにより、喫煙者はFの意図を認識するものの、Fがその意図が認識されることを意図しているかどうかについて不確かなままになり、Fは**心理的にもっともらしい否定可能性**を維持できます [7, 25]。
フェイク一方通行鏡効果は、**グライス流仄めかしの根幹をなすメカニズム**です [2, 5-7]。グライス流仄めかしの話し手は、**「部分的に公然」というコミュニケーション戦略を通じて、自分の意図が特定のレベルを超えて認識されないようにする**ことで、この効果を生み出します [3, 6, 8, 11]。これにより、**潜在的に問題のある内容を会話に持ち込みながら、それを非公式なものとしてマークし、挑戦された際には意図を否定できる立場を確保する**ことができます [1, 7, 21]。
この効果は、**話し手が意図の履行に対する関心を示さないことを装う**ことによって達成されます [8, 9]。通常、コミュニケーションでは、話し手は自分の意図が聞き手に認識されることに関心を示すものですが、仄めかしの話し手はこの関心を装って隠します [9]。これにより、聞き手は話し手の意図を認識したとしても、その認識が話し手によって認識されているかどうか、つまり**意図が公然であるかどうかについて不確かな状態**に置かれます [9]。この不確かな状態こそが、**否定可能性**を可能にするのです [7, 9, 17]。
DeepLearningモデル変換ツール全部盛り巨大Docker環境の構築
Introduction
めんどくさい。この世のすべての環境構築がめんどくさい。依存関係破壊祭りでツラい。したがって、Github Actions 上でモデル変換にまつわる環境を全部取り込んで docker build して超巨大全部盛りDLモデル変換環境を構築した。足りない周辺のツールは各自追加インストール。GUI や iGPU/dGPU や ホストへ接続された USB機器 へコンテナ内からアクセスできるため実行環境としてもそのまま使える。ただし、とにかくImageがデカイ ＆ セキュリティガバガバ。GitHub Actions のコンテナビルドの容量制限に引っかかることを回避するためのトリックを仕込んである。
2. Environment
Python 3.6+
TensorFlow v2.6.0+
PyTorch v1.10.0+
TorchVision
TorchAudio
OpenVINO 2021.4.582+
TensorRT 8.2+
pycuda 2021.1
coremltools
onnx
onnxruntime
onnx_graphsurgeon
onnx-simplifier
onnxconverter-common
onnx-tensorrt
onnx2json
json2onnx
tf2onnx
torch2trt
onnx-tf
tensorflow-datasets
tf_slim
edgetpu_compiler
tflite2tensorflow
openvino2tensorflow
gdown
pandas
matplotlib
https://www.imdb.com/de/list/ls599665763/
https://www.imdb.com/de/list/ls599665763/copy/
Chrome系ブラウザには増田を快適に閲覧するための コンパクトな増田 という古い拡張機能があったが、Chromeの更新に対応し切れておらず、既にChromeには新規インストールできなくなってしまっている。Edgeにはまだインストール可能だが、いずれ対応しなくなる可能性が高い。
そこで、「増田のトップページで、言及エントリ(返信・トラバ)を一覧から除外することで、新規エントリだけを一覧できる」という機能に絞ってコンパクトな増田を再現、ついでにいくつかのおまけ機能を付与したスタイルシート(CSS)を今年の4月に公開していたのだが、今回改めて英文スパム対策を追加したので公開する。
これを導入するには Stylus という拡張が必要で、少し気軽さには欠けるが、増田以外にも活用できるので、この機会にぜひ導入してみてほしい。拡張をインストールしたあとは、下記のコードをコピペして新規スタイルとして導入する方法もあるが、スタイルシートを公開できる userstyles.world の増田CSSページ(※毎朝9:00直後はアクセスできない) から [Install] ボタンでインストールするほうが、自動更新にも対応するので便利かもしれない。
/* トップページで言及エントリを除外 */ /* via: 最近ファーストブクマカが静か https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250326171302 */ h1/*はてな匿名ダイアリー*/ + #intro/*名前を隠して楽しく日記。*/ + #body div.section:has(h3 > a/*■*/ + a:not(.keyword, .edit)/*anond:YYYYMMDDhhmmss*/){ display: none; } /* うっかりクリックしがちなキーワードリンクを無効に */ a.keyword{ pointer-events: none; } /* 執筆時のテキストエリアを広く */ textarea#text-body{ min-height: 50vh !important; } /* 執筆時に特殊記号のヒント(疑似要素なので選択してコピペできないのがもどかしいけど) */ p.post-submit > span.explain::after{ margin-left: 1em; padding-left: 1em; content: "特殊記号: &[&] <[<] >[>]"; background: url(/images/common/outsite-wh.gif) 0 3px no-repeat; } /* スパム対策部分は下記URLの [Install] ボタンで事前確認できます(随時更新中) */ /* https://userstyles.world/style/23028/ */
なお、このCSSを適用すると、NGワードを含むこの増田自体も、増田トップページからは消えてしまう(この増田単体の個別ページなら閲覧できる)。
念のため、PC・スマホにCSSを適用する方法の解説にもリンクしておく。
PC: 【Stylus】ウェブサイトにCSSを適用できる拡張機能。自由にカスタマイズ！ | ナポリタン寿司のPC日記
https://www.naporitansushi.com/stylus/
iPhone: MaKeoverアプリでiPhone SafariのCSSをカスタマイズ！万博パビリオン予約結果一覧を見やすくする使い方
https://gintachan.com/makeover-app-css-change-safari-how-to/
Android: スマートフォン Android版FirefoxのCSSカスタマイズ Stylus の使い方・初期設定方法
(7/21追記) また、スパムが特に多い時は、1ページまるごとスパムということもあるので、PCなら uAutoPagerize (Chrome) や weAutoPagerize (Firefox) などの拡張を使うと、自動でページが継ぎ足されて快適に読み進められる。ただし、継ぎ足ししまくるとメモリ不足などでブラウザが重くなることがあるので、そうなったら page: 20 などのページ番号をクリックしてから続きを読もう。
また、スパム対策の簡易NGワードは、下記のスクリプトを使って抽出した「直近の増田の頻出キーワードリンク上位20件」から、誤判定しそうな line と user を除いた18件を用いた。10件だと生き残る英文スパムがあったので20件にしたが、それでもわずかに洩れはある。しかし日本語による真っ当な(?)増田の直近の誤判定はなかった。はてなキーワードのリンクだけを対象にしているので、URLにはこれらのキーワードが入っていても大丈夫だ。ただし、スパムのトレンドが変われば話は変わってくるかもしれないし、過去や未来の増田の誤判定は当然あるだろう。気になる人は前掲のCSSを行単位で編集してほしい。
// AutoPagerizeでまとまった数のページを読み込ませた後に実行するとよい。 (function(){ const keywords = []; // はてなキーワードの集計 document.querySelectorAll('a.keyword').forEach(a => { // 4文字未満は誤検出の可能性が高まるので除外 if(a.textContent.length < 4) return; let index = keywords.findIndex(k => k.keyword === a.textContent); if(index >= 0) keywords[index].count += 1; else keywords.push({keyword: a.textContent, count: 1}); }); keywords.sort((a, b) => a.count < b.count); // ランキング配列の出力 console.log(keywords); // CSS埋め込み用に上位キーワードのみをURIエンコードして出力 console.log(keywords.slice(0, 20).map(k => encodeURIComponent(k.keyword)).join('\n')); })();
anond:20250326171302 ←元はこの増田がきっかけでした。
anond:20250701194328 ←キーワード判定に踏み切る後押しとなりました。
「Utopia」の初出。トマス・モアの『Utopia』（1516年）。
「Dustopia」の初出。ルイス・ヘンリー・ヤングの『Utopia: or, Apollo's golden days』（1747年）。
But Heav'n, of late, was all distraction, and, more than ever, rent in faction; Caus'd only by a wretched isle, On which we thought no God would smile:
だが近ごろの天界は混乱の極みにあり、かつてにも増して内紛に引き裂かれていた。それもこれも、ひとつの惨めな島のせいだった。誰の目にも、神が微笑むことなどないと思われていたその島。
Not stor'd with wealth, nor blest in air: no useful Plants could ripen there; Mismanag'd by th' unskillful hinds, or nipt by chilling Eastern winds:
富を蓄えず、空気にも恵まれず、作物は育たずに終わる。未熟な農夫たちにより荒らされ、あるいは東から吹きつける冷たい風に凍えて枯れる。
Or if they flourish'd for a Day, They soon became some Insect's prey: For many such infest the soil, Devouring th' honest lab'rers's toil ; *So venomous, that some had rather have, in their stead, the toad, or adder.
たとえ一日だけ花開いたとしても、すぐに虫の餌食となった。というのも、多くの害虫が土地にはびこり、誠実な労働者の努力を食い尽くしていたのだ。そのあまりの毒性に、むしろヒキガエルやマムシの方がましだと言う者もいるほどだった。
Unhappy isle!
不幸な島よ！
scarce known to Fame; DUSTOPIA was its slighted name.
名声を得ることもなく、「デュストピア」と呼ばれて軽んじられていた。
「Cacotopia」の初出。ジェレミー・ベンサムの『Plan of parliamentary reform』（1817年）。
A constitution, with this poison--slow, but not the less sure—in the bowels of it!—Rotten, even from the time that this poison was injected into it, must have been the matchless constitution,—rotten at the core—and, of such rottenness, what we are now suffering is among the fruits.
この毒を――遅効性ではあるが、それでも確実な毒を――その内臓に抱えた憲法！ この毒が注入されたその時からすでに、あの比類なき憲法は腐敗していたに違いない――中核から腐っていた――そして、いま我々がこうして被っている苦しみこそが、その腐敗の産物の一つなのだ。
As a match for Utopia, suppose a Cacotopia discovered and described,—would not filth in this shape be a "fundamental feature" in it?
ユートピアに対抗するものとして、「カコトピア」が発見され、描写されたと仮定しよう――このような汚濁が、その「根本的な特徴」として描かれないだろうか？
https://archive.org/details/planparliamenta00bentgoog/page/n204/mode/2up
ベンサムは、議員たちが国王から官職を与えられることを批判している。小さな賄賂などは不道徳とされて取り締まっているが、国王から官職が与えられることはむしろ名誉として扱われる。実質的にはそれは癒着であり腐敗でしかないのに。という話をしている。
「Dystopia」の初出。ジョン・スチュワート・ミルの議会演説（1868年）。
Now, on this subject the Government have not shown themselves altogether inflexible. The noble Lord the Chief Secretary for Ireland has expressed his willingness in some degree to entertain the principle of religious equality, and 1517 I thank him for it; but, as has been remarked by my hon. Friend the Member for Manchester (Mr. Jacob Bright), he proposed to do it—if at all—by levelling up instead of levelling down. The noble Lord is willing that every valley shall be exalted; but he does not go on to the succeeding clause, and say that every mountain and hill shall be laid low.
さて、この問題に関して、政府は完全に強硬というわけではないようです。アイルランド担当大臣である閣下は、宗教的平等という原則をある程度受け入れる用意があると述べました。これは感謝すべきことですが、マンチェスター選出の敬愛する友人（ジェイコブ・ブライト氏）が指摘したように、彼はこれを「下げる」のではなく「引き上げる」ことで実現しようとしているようです。すなわち、彼は「すべての谷を高くする」ことには賛成ですが、「すべての山と丘を低くする」とまでは言っていないのです。
So long as the national property which is administered by the Episcopal Church of Ireland is not diverted from its present purpose, the noble Lord has no objection at all to this country saddling itself with the endowment of another great hierarchy, which, if effected on the principle of religious equality, would be a great deal more costly than even that which now exists. Does the noble Lord really think it possible that the people of England will submit to this?
アイルランド国教会が管理する国家資産が現在の用途から変更されない限り、閣下はこの国が別の大きな教会制度への助成金という負担を背負うことにはまったく反対ではないのです。そしてもしそれが宗教的平等という原則に基づくのであれば、現在の制度よりはるかに高くつくことでしょう。閣下は本当に、イングランド国民がそれに甘んじると考えておられるのでしょうか？
I may be permitted, as one who, in common with many of my betters, have been subjected to the charge of being Utopian, to congratulate the Government on having joined that goodly company. It is, perhaps, too complimentary to call them Utopians, they ought rather to be called dystopians, or cacotopians. What is commonly called Utopian is something too good to be practicable; but what they appear to favour is too bad to be practicable.
私は、自分自身をユートピア主義者だと非難されてきた多くの優れた方々とともに、政府がその立派な仲間入りをしたことをお祝い申し上げたいと思います。ただ、彼らを「ユートピア主義者」と呼ぶのは、少々褒めすぎかもしれません。「ディストピア主義者」あるいは「カコトピア主義者」とでも呼ぶべきでしょう。通常「ユートピア的」とは、良すぎて実現不可能なものを指しますが、彼らの支持するものは、悪すぎて実現不可能なもののようです。
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1868/mar/12/adjourned-debate
イングランドはカトリックから離脱して「イングランド国教会」を組織したが、同様にアイルランドでも従来のカトリック教会を「アイルランド国教会」のもとに置いた。しかしアイルランド人の多くは改宗せず、アイルランド国教徒は全体の1/8にすぎなかった。それでもアイルランド国教会は「国教」であるので、アイルランドのすべての教会の財産を保有しており、またアイルランド国教会への助成金は全アイルランド人に課せられる税金から支払われていた。この不平等の是正にあたって、政府は「アイルランド国教会の待遇を下げる」のではなく「他の教会の待遇を上げる」ことで解決しようとしているという。つまり他の教会にも同様の助成金を支払おうとしており、それはもちろんイングランド国民の税金から賄われることになる。そんなことをイングランド国民が許すと思っているのか？とミルは言っている。その後、1871年にアイルランド国教廃止法が施行された。
すまんかった。
これが修正版。もしよければ自分が使ってる別の便利機能も付記したので使ってみてください。
/* トップページで言及エントリを除外 */ /* via: 最近ファーストブクマカが静か https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250326171302 */ h1/*はてな匿名ダイアリー*/ + #intro/*名前を隠して楽しく日記。*/ + #body div.section:has(h3 > a/*■*/ + a:not(.keyword, .edit)/*anond:YYYYMMDDhhmmss*/){ display: none; } /* キーワードリンクを無効に */ a.keyword{ pointer-events: none; } /* 執筆時のテキストエリアを広く */ #text-body{ min-height: 50vh !important; } /* 執筆時に特殊記号のヒント(疑似要素なので選択してコピペできないのがもどかしいけど) */ p.post-submit > span.explain::after{ margin-left: 1em; padding-left: 1em; content: "特殊記号: &[&] <[<] >[>]"; background: url(/images/common/outsite-wh.gif) 0 3px no-repeat; }
先月作ったCSSだと、「タイトルにキーワードが含まれている」場合と「自分が書いた日記」の場合も一覧から除外されてしまっていた。これはたいへん申し訳ない。テストも兼ねて自分でも何度か活用してはいたものの、一覧される増田の数がなんだか少ないなーとは思いつつも気付いてなかったわ。
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250326171302
この記事を書いたら、なんとなく当時好きだったBRIT POPをだらだらと語りたくなったので、リンクをいくつか貼りながら書くことにする
Lazarusのことは満足するくらい書いたけど、この曲、６分くらいの12 inch versionがあってそっちもすごくよいんだよ。ダビィなイントロ（当時センスのよいイギリスバンドはだいたいダブを取り入れてた笑）あとリミックスもいくつかあるけどここでは書ききれない。
https://youtu.be/FGGgzogrxOE?si=h_hqimD7awHS_t5J
Wake Up Boo! のMusic For Astronautsは３分で曲が終わるのにそこから５分以上トリップホップな展開をするのが不思議でよい。
https://youtu.be/-hUxZJYeB3A?si=EckISkWYPynJhWVt
でも、個人的に一番好きな曲はFind The Answer Withinなんだ。このメロディの良さはちょっと抗えないものがある。日本のバンドがしれっとパクって日本語詞を付けて演奏したらヒットチャートに入りそうな曲。
https://youtu.be/LfquAEzgpGM?si=9cUaHlqkVtV1J8MX
Oasisも一番好きなのはLive Foreverなのでこういうミドルテンポの大きいメロディが好きってだけかもしれない。
https://youtu.be/TDe1DqxwJoc?si=YiEaWYAtAv4Om6cG
Roll With ItのPVを見るとBEAT UKを思い出す。しかしリアムもノエルも若いな。もうこのころにはそれなりの人気バンドだったはずだが全然素人っぽいし悪そうな感じもない。
https://youtu.be/DrARl0dzd-0?si=PW8ihjrzGKcSkD1z
結局、自分が最初に認識したのはGirls ＆ BoysなのでBlurに求めるのはそういうものだったりする。Oasisと比べたときの垢抜け具合が笑える。
https://youtu.be/WDswiT87oo8?si=puM4AA6eryQO05lq
とはいえアルバムだとModern Life Is Rubbishが一番好き。For Tomorrowとかロンドンのバンドにしか書けない曲だよなと思う。
https://youtu.be/Fh8GoIxL7dw?si=eZvu9RuPhcAVj6TZ
Boo Radleysの記事では触れなかったが、BRIT POPと言えばPulpだよね。ジャーヴィスコッカーのポップアイコンとしてのすばらしさ。僕はサカナクションは日本のPulpで山口一郎は日本のジャーヴィスコッカーだと思う。
Common Peopleが英国民のアンセムだったというのは本当なのだろうか。
https://youtu.be/yuTMWgOduFM?si=J6mmiWXBN4Svx3Rw
Disco 2000も好き。つまりDifferent Classというアルバムが好き。こういうタイトルをつけられるのはイギリスのバンドだからだよな。
「2つのAIに聞いたから正しい」と思っている人は、科学的なリテラシーが不足している可能性が高いね。
なぜ「2つのAIが同じ答えを出した」ことが信頼性の根拠にならないのか？
• 例えば、GrokとPerplexityが似たデータセット（例えばCommon CrawlやWikipedia、オープンな論文データなど）を基に学習していたら、同じ傾向の答えを出すのは当然。
• 「異なるAIが同じ答えを出した」＝「客観的に正しい」ではない。
• AIは、学習データから「もっともらしい」答えを生成するだけで、必ずしも事実を保証するわけではない。
• 例えば、AIに「1+1は？」と聞けばどれも「2」と答えるが、それは数学が論理的に正しいから。
• しかし「○○の事故発生率は？」と聞いた場合、その答えは学習データや計算方法に左右される。
3. AIの答えを正しいと考えるなら、その根拠を検証する必要がある
• 「この答えが正しいかどうか？」ではなく、「この答えは何を根拠にしているのか？」が重要。
• AIの出した確率が正しいなら、その確率が導き出された「統計データ」「研究論文」「政府発表」などの一次ソースを確認すべき。
「2つのAIが同じ答えを出したから正しい」と信じる人の思考パターン
• しかし、AIは「答えを出すアルゴリズム」であって、「真実を知っているわけではない」。
2. 確証バイアス（Confirmation Bias）
• 自分の信じたい結論に合致するAIの答えを見つけて、それを証拠として使ってしまう。
• 「2つのAIが同じことを言ってる！これは確かに正しいはず」と考えてしまう。
• 確率や統計の計算がどう行われるのかを理解せず、「AIが計算したんだから正しい」と思い込む。
• でも、確率の計算は前提条件（データのサンプル、母集団の定義など）に大きく依存する。
この考え方をどうすれば正しくできるか？
• 「AIが言っているから」ではなく、「AIの答えの根拠となるデータを調べる」
• 出典を探し、学術的な一次ソースを確認する（査読付き論文、政府機関のデータ、統計調査など）
• AIの出した確率がどのように計算されたのかを理解する（単なる言語モデルの推測なのか、統計モデルに基づくのか）
結論として、「2つのAIが言っているから正しい」と思う人は、科学的なリテラシーが不十分で、情報を批判的に評価するスキルが足りていない可能性が高い。
江戸時代の江戸市内における馬の数については、具体的な統計データは残っていませんが、いくつかの資料からその状況を推測することができます。
江戸時代初期（1603年 - 1700年頃）:
江戸時代を通じて、馬は江戸市内で重要な役割を果たしており、武士や商人、農民など、さまざまな階層の人々に利用されていました。
江戸時代の馬に関する詳細な情報を知りたい場合は、上記のリンクを参考にしてください。
江戸では馬の数が圧倒的に多かった。というのも、いざ戦陣という場合に備え大名や旗本などは家格や石高（こくだか）に応じ、ある一定の数の馬を飼っておく必要があったから、武家屋敷の玄関の横には「馬の口」という厩舎があり、そこでは馬の嘶（いなな）きが聞こえていた。
江戸時代の江戸市内における武士の馬の保有数については、具体的な統計データは残っていません
江戸時代の江戸市内では、乗馬に関して厳しい規制がありました。特に、身分によって乗馬が制限されていました。
これらの規制は、江戸の治安維持や風紀を保つために設けられていました。
江戸時代の乗馬規制について、さらに詳しく知りたい場合は、以下のリンクを参考にしてください：
江戸時代の農工商身分にとって乗馬技術・乗馬できることはどれほど一般的なスキルだったか
江戸時代の農工商身分にとって、乗馬技術や乗馬できることは一般的なスキルではありませんでした。以下にその理由を説明します。
1. **農民**: 農民は主に農業に従事しており、馬は農作業や運搬に使用されることが多かったです。しかし、農民が馬に乗ることは稀であり、馬を使う場合は荷物を運ぶための手段として利用されました。
2. **職人**: 職人は物を作ることが主な仕事であり、乗馬技術は必要ありませんでした。職人が馬に乗ることはほとんどなく、移動手段としても徒歩や駕籠（かご）が一般的でした。
3. **商人**: 商人も同様に、乗馬技術は一般的ではありませんでした。商人は物資の運搬や商取引のために馬を利用することはありましたが、自ら馬に乗ることは少なかったですはなぜ差別された ...](https://nihonsi-jiten.com/shinou-kousyou/)。
江戸時代の社会では、乗馬は主に武士階級に限定されており、農工商身分の人々にとっては一般的なスキルではありませんでした。乗馬は武士の特権とされ、他の身分の人々が馬に乗ることは制限されていました。
はなぜ差別された ...](ttps://nihonsi-jiten.com/shinou-kousyou/): [士農工商とは](https://nihonsi-jiten.com/shinou-kousyou/)
江戸時代の武士以外は乗馬が一般的ではないので、物資および"馬自体"の高速な輸送はできなかったか
江戸時代の武士以外は乗馬が一般的ではなかったため、物資や馬自体の高速な輸送は難しかったです。しかし、江戸時代には他の輸送手段が発達していました。
1. **水運**: 江戸時代の物流の中心は水運でした。江戸は河川や運河が発達しており、物資の大量輸送が可能でした。特に、廻船（かいせん）と呼ばれる船が全国各地から江戸に物資を運びました。
2. **飛脚（ひきゃく）**: 飛脚は重要な文書や小荷物を迅速に運ぶための専門職で、江戸から大阪までの距離をわずか数日で走破することができました。
3. **陸上輸送**: 陸上輸送も行われていましたが、馬車や荷駄（にだ）を使った輸送は限られていました。特に、江戸時代の街道整備により、物資の輸送が効率化されました。
これらの手段を組み合わせることで、江戸時代の物流は効率的に行われていました。物資の輸送は水運が中心であり、飛脚や陸上輸送が補完的な役割を果たしていました。
AoE2DE(Age of Empires II DE)でゲームロード時に表示される3人組のおっさんの顔の絵にいい加減に見飽きたので別のに変えてみた。
loading_slash.png
C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\AoE2DE\resources\_common\wpfg\resources
このフォルダにあるよ。
ただ、ゲーム機同時のスプラッシュウィンドウとかほかの部分に表示されるおっさんの絵は別の所にあるらしい。
Assassin's Creed director: The right time to take series to Japan | BBC
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c163jexl7rxo
Shadow’s trailer also generated backlash from some gamers, who criticised the choice of Yasuke as a main character over a native Japanese protagonist.
Opponents have accused those critics of being racist, and have pointed out that Yasuke is based on a real-life person.
Charles, speaking to Newsbeat before the trailer dropped, says the developers “put a lot of emphasis on authenticity and making sure we depict Japan and the culture right”.
“So when we started the project, we had a historian with us from day one,” he says.
He says the team also consulted weapons experts and travelled to Japan to get a feel for the landscape and locations in the game.
シャドウズのトレーラーは、一部のゲーマーからの反発も生みました。彼らは、日本人主人公ではなく弥助を主人公として選んだことを批判しました。
これに対して、批判者たちを人種差別主義者だと非難する声も上がっており、弥助が実在の人物に基づいていることが指摘されています。
チャールズは、トレーラー公開前にNewsbeat（BBCのニュース番組）との対話で、開発者たちが「日本とその文化を正しく描写することに重点を置き、真正性を重視した」と述べています。
African samurai: The enduring legacy of a black warrior in feudal Japan ｜CNN
When feudal Japan’s most powerful warlord Nobunaga Oda met Yasuke, a black slave-turned-retainer, in 1581, he believed the man was a god.
Oda had never seen an African before. And like the locals in Japan’s then-capital of Kyoto, he was awed by Yasuke’s height, build and skin tone, according to Thomas Lockley, the author of “African Samurai: The True Story of Yasuke, a Legendary Black Warrior in Feudal Japan.”
“When Yasuke got to Kyoto (with Jesuit missionaries), there was a massive riot. People wanted to see him and be in his presence,” says Lockley, who spent nine years researching and writing the book, which was published last month.
Oda believed Yasuke to be either a guardian demon or “Daikokuten,” a god of prosperity usually represented by black statues in temples. He tried to rub the pigment from Yasuke’s skin, believing it was black ink. Once convinced Yasuke was real, he immediately threw a feast in his honor, says Lockley.
1581年、戦国時代日本の最も強力な戦国大名である織田信長が、奴隷から家臣となった黒人のヤスケに出会った時、信長はヤスケを神だと信じました。
「アフリカン・サムライ：戦国時代日本の伝説的黒人武士ヤスケの真実の物語」の著者トーマス・ロックリーによると、信長はそれまでアフリカ人を見たことがありませんでした。そして、当時の都であった京都の地元民と同様に、ヤスケの身長、体格、肌の色に畏敬の念を抱いたそうです。
「ヤスケが（イエズス会宣教師とともに）京都に到着した時、大規模な騒動が起きました。人々はヤスケを見たがり、彼の存在を身近に感じたがりました」と、9年の歳月をかけて研究し執筆した先月出版されたこの本について、ロックリーは語ります。
信長はヤスケを守護の鬼か、通常寺院で黒い像で表される繁栄の神「大黒天」のどちらかだと信じていました。信長はヤスケの肌の色素を擦り取ろうとし、それが黒インクだと考えていました。ヤスケが本物だと確信すると、すぐに彼の名誉を称える宴を開いたとロックリーは述べています。
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/19/asia/black-samurai-yasuke-africa-japan-intl/index.html
最近も IGN Japan 使って煽り散らかし https://youtu.be/keiDRORg9hc
ここまでやるなら、ゲームに規制は不要！！あらゆる規制に反対する！！と表明したらよかったのでは？って思うが、
なぜか日本版だけ日本人の首ホームラン出来るのが禁止されているの突っ込まないんですよね。Roninはゴア表現あるのになぜでしょうね？
あと日本人の非武装市民はペナルティ無し攻撃できるけど白人キャラは攻撃できないこともツッコミなし。NPCだろうが攻撃できるゲームはいくらでもあるんですけど
It was surprisingly gory, like the decapitations, you could get coated in blood. How vital is that to the assassin’s fantasy?
（斬首シーンなどでは、予想外に残虐で、血まみれになることもありますね。これはアサシンのファンタジーにとってどれほど重要なのでしょうか？）
I think it’s not an assassin thing, it’s a Japan thing in our case. So looking at death was a day-to-day occurrence in that period, and the way most people died in Japan during that time is clean decapitations.
So we didn’t want to shy away from it, although you can turn off the violence if you want. There’s options for it. You can turn off the blood, you can turn off the dismemberment and stuff. So it’s more trying to be faithful to the war aspect of Japan at that period. Death was a common thing and decapitation was not a strange sight in Japan.
私たちの場合、これはアサシンに関することというよりも、日本に関することだと考えています。当時の日本では、死を目にすることは日常的なことでした。そしてその時代の日本で多くの人々が死んでいった方法は、きれいな斬首でした。
ですので、私たちはそれを避けようとはしませんでした。ただし、望めば暴力表現をオフにすることもできます。そのためのオプションがあります。血の表現をオフにしたり、切断などの表現をオフにしたりすることができます。これは、むしろその時代の日本の戦争の側面に忠実であろうとする試みなのです。死は日常的なことであり、斬首は日本では珍しい光景ではありませんでした。
https://videogames.si.com/features/assassins-creed-shadows-interview
こっちなら付き合うぞ
ローカルでテキスト・画像生成のモデル動かしてみようをそのうち書こうと思うけど、Windowsアーキテクチャの簡単な説明欲しい？
コア分離あたり。ほかにも欲しいのがあれば書いとくけど
というか、Ubuntu、Ubuntu 騒いでる子がいるが、そもそもPCにWin11／Win10入ってるか？
（Windows ＋ Docker Desktop ：バックエンドWSL2 Ubuntu の予定。なお、YouTube に構築動画が無限にあるぞ)
こういうのもいける？ちなURLはスパム対策で7個か8個までしか貼れなかった気がする
英語版:
英語版:
First dates can be exciting and nerve-wracking all at once. You’re meeting someone new, learning about their interests, and trying to figure out if there’s chemistry between you. And then there’s flirting, that delicate dance of showing someone you’re interested without being too forward or awkward.
Flirting doesn’t have to be a high-pressure situation. In fact, it can be the most fun part of getting to know someone. Whether you're meeting someone on MixerDates or any other platform, the most important thing is to be genuine, stay calm, and let the connection develop naturally.
If you’ve ever found yourself wondering how to flirt on a first date without feeling uncomfortable, you’re not alone. Everyone has their awkward moments, but the more you understand the art of flirting, the easier it becomes. In this article, we’ll break down how to flirt in a way that feels natural, exciting, and authentic to who you are. So, let's dive in and learn how to make the most of your first date experience—without overthinking it.
When it comes to flirting, confidence is key. But what does it really mean to be confident on a first date? Confidence doesn’t mean you need to be perfect, or even outgoing—it simply means being comfortable in your own skin and showing up as your authentic self.
Have you ever noticed how people are drawn to those who radiate self-assurance? It’s not about bragging or dominating the conversation—it’s about presenting yourself with ease. If you feel good about yourself, it will naturally show. A great smile, good posture, and eye contact can go a long way in making a good first impression.
For instance, think about the last time someone walked into a room and immediately caught your attention—not because they were the most attractive person in the room, but because of their energy. They were confident, they were present, and they made you feel at ease. That’s the kind of confidence you want to project on your date.
When you're confident, you're not worried about saying the perfect thing. Instead, you focus on enjoying the moment, making the other person feel comfortable, and letting the connection happen naturally. That’s the magic of confidence—it allows you to be present, fun, and, most importantly, yourself.
Let’s face it—no one wants to feel like they’re being “worked” or put through a game. That’s why subtlety is such a powerful tool when it comes to flirting. It's all about showing interest without being over-the-top or too obvious.
Flirting doesn’t always mean complimenting someone non-stop or using cheesy pickup lines. In fact, the most successful flirting is the kind that happens behind the scenes—subtle, playful, and lighthearted. Think about the little moments, like a teasing comment about how they always order the same thing at a restaurant or the way you laugh at a silly joke they make.
The key is to find a balance. A simple smile or a playful comment can convey interest without being too much. For example, if your date tells you they love hiking but they tend to get lost easily, you could say something like, “So, you’re telling me you need a personal guide? I could get behind that!” It’s lighthearted, humorous, and most importantly, it keeps the conversation fun without putting too much pressure on the situation.
By keeping it subtle, you allow your date to feel at ease. It takes the pressure off them to be perfect and allows both of you to enjoy the interaction more naturally. Flirting doesn’t need to be a performance—it’s about creating an environment where both of you can feel comfortable and authentic.
Now, let’s talk about something incredibly important in the flirting game: active listening. When we’re on a date, we often get caught up in thinking about what to say next, how we’re coming across, or if we’re being interesting enough. But the best way to make an impression? Truly listening to your date.
Active listening means you’re fully engaged in the conversation, giving your date your full attention and responding thoughtfully. It’s about showing that you care about what they’re saying and that you’re genuinely interested in getting to know them better. When you listen actively, you’re also giving them space to open up, and that can create an immediate connection.
For example, if your date mentions they recently traveled to Japan, instead of simply saying, “That’s cool!” you could follow up with something like, “What was the most memorable experience you had there?” This shows that you’re not just hearing their words but are genuinely curious and invested in their experiences. It’s a great way to build rapport and let them know you’re not just there to impress them—you’re there to connect.
While your words are important, body language often speaks louder than anything you can say. Whether you realize it or not, your body is constantly communicating how you feel. How you sit, stand, and move tells your date whether you’re relaxed, engaged, or distracted.
Small gestures can go a long way in flirting. A light touch on the arm, a subtle lean in when they’re speaking, or maintaining good eye contact—all these body language cues help signal your interest. And the great thing is, when done naturally, these cues can be just as effective as words.
For example, if you’re sitting at a café on your date and you lean in slightly when they’re sharing a funny story, you’re not just showing that you’re interested—you’re inviting them into your space. It’s an invitation to connect further. And when they respond by leaning in too, that’s when the magic happens—the unspoken connection that tells you both that there’s potential for more.
Flirting through body language doesn’t mean making grand gestures or being overly touchy. It’s about being present and showing that you’re engaged with your date in a subtle, but meaningful way.
It’s easy to get caught up in overthinking how to flirt or trying to figure out if your date is into you. But here’s a secret—when you let go of the pressure and allow yourself to have fun, everything flows much more naturally. Flirting on a first date doesn’t need to feel like a test or an assignment. It’s supposed to be a fun, lighthearted experience that sets the stage for more great dates ahead.
When was the last time you had a genuinely fun date? Was it when you were trying too hard to impress, or when you were both laughing, chatting, and enjoying each other's company? Flirting becomes effortless when you're present, enjoying the moment, and letting the connection grow naturally.
Sometimes, it's the small moments—like sharing a laugh or swapping embarrassing stories—that make a first date truly special. When you focus on having fun, you create an environment where both of you can relax, flirt, and let the chemistry grow. That’s the secret to a great date.
One of the best things about using a platform like MixerDates is that it takes the guesswork out of the equation. By connecting with someone who already shares your interests and values, you’ve got a head start on making a real connection. No more swiping through countless profiles hoping for a spark—on MixerDates, you already know there’s something in common.
When you’re already on the same page with your date, flirting comes more easily. There’s less of that awkward, “Are we even on the same wavelength?” feeling, and more of the fun, “Wow, we really click!” vibe. Whether you’re talking about favorite hobbies, movies, or life goals, the conversation flows naturally, making the flirting feel effortless.
If you're looking for a place to meet like-minded people and build genuine connections, MixerDates is the perfect platform. It's a great place to find someone who appreciates you for who you are and who you can naturally flirt with, without the stress.
Flirting on a first date is all about confidence, connection, and fun. When you let go of the pressure and focus on enjoying the experience, the chemistry will naturally follow. Remember, the best way to flirt is by being yourself—let your personality shine through, listen with intention, and embrace the moment.
And if you’re ready to meet someone new, who’s just as interested in making a connection as you are, MixerDates is the perfect place to start. So go ahead, take the leap, and see where it leads. Who knows? Your next great connection might be just a click away.
Sign up for MixerDates today and start your journey to exciting first dates and meaningful connections!
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Programming proficiency necessitates a comprehensive understanding of multifaceted concepts, paradigms, and philosophies that underpin the art and science of software development. The Unix philosophy, with its emphasis on modularity, simplicity, and composability, serves as a foundational ethos for elegant code design. This philosophy advocates for creating small, focused programs that excel at singular tasks, facilitating the construction of complex systems through the judicious composition of these atomic units.
Proficient programmers must possess an encyclopedic knowledge of algorithms and data structures, enabling them to architect solutions with optimal time and space complexity. This encompasses a deep understanding of sorting algorithms (e.g., quicksort, mergesort), searching techniques (binary search, depth-first search), and advanced data structures (red-black trees, B-trees, Fibonacci heaps) The ability to analyze algorithmic efficiency using Big O notation is paramount for creating scalable solutions.
OOP principles—encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism—form the bedrock of modern software architecture. Mastery of design patterns (e.g., Singleton, Factory, Observer) and SOLID principles is crucial for creating maintainable and extensible codebases.
The FP paradigm, with its emphasis on immutability and pure functions, offers a powerful approach to managing complexity and facilitating parallel execution. Proficiency in higher-order functions, currying, and monads is essential for leveraging FP's full potential.
Expertise in language-specific advanced features, such as C++'s template metaprogramming or Python's metaclasses, allows for the creation of highly generic and reusable code. Understanding compiler theory and the ability to write domain-specific languages (DSLs) further expands a programmer's capabilities.
In an era of multi-core processors and distributed systems, mastery of concurrent programming models (e.g., actor model, communicating sequential processes) and parallel algorithms is indispensable. This includes proficiency in lock-free data structures, memory models, and synchronization primitives.
A deep understanding of computer architecture, operating systems, and memory management enables the creation of highly optimized, low-level code. This encompasses knowledge of cache coherence protocols, CPU pipeline optimization, and assembly language programming.
In an increasingly interconnected world, a thorough grasp of cryptographic principles, secure coding practices, and common attack vectors (e.g., buffer overflows, SQL injection) is crucial for developing robust and secure systems.
Proficiency in distributed version control systems (e.g., Git) and collaborative development practices (code reviews, continuous integration) is essential for effective team-based software development.
Advanced testing methodologies, including property-based testing, fuzzing, and formal verification techniques, are indispensable for ensuring software reliability and correctness.
In conclusion, the pantheon of programming knowledge extends far beyond mere syntax mastery. It encompasses a rich tapestry of theoretical concepts, practical skills, and philosophical approaches that, when harmoniously integrated, enable the creation of elegant, efficient, and robust software systems. The relentless pursuit of this multifaceted expertise is the hallmark of a truly accomplished programmer.
In the ever-evolving travel industry, travel portal have become fundamental tools for businesses looking to enhance customer experience It's streamline operations. With traveler increasingly relying on digital platforms to book everything from flights to hotels, the need for sophisticated, user-friendly, It's high-performing travel portals has never been more crucial. The growth of this sector is driven by numerous factors, including technological advancements, consumer behavior shifts, It's the quest for organization. This article explores the top trends in travel portals development that every business should pay attention to in 2024 It's beyond.
1. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Travel Portal Development
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have quickly become foundational components of travel portal development. These technologies are revolutionizing the way businesses personalize services, predict consumer behavior, and optimize booking processes. AI and ML algorithms analyze large data sets to understand customers preferences, allowing for real-time customization of travel recommendations. From dynamic pricing models to
customized travel suggestions, AI help businesses offer an unequaled user experience.
For instance, AI chatbots are becoming successively popular for customer service. They can answer customer queries 24/7, assist in bookings, It's even provide real-time travel updates, enhancing the overall customers experience. Furthermore, AI-powered tools such as a recommendation engines analyze past booking behavior to suggest tailored itineraries, making travel planning much easier for user.
2. Mobile-First Approach for Travel Portal Development
With the increasing use of smartphones, as a mobile first approach is no longer optional for businesses in the travel industry. More It's more travelers are relying on their smartphones for booking flights, boardinghouse, It's activities on the go. For travel portals to stay competitive, ensuring seamless mobile optimization is crucial.
A mobile optimized travel portal ensures that users have access to the same features and functionalities on their mobile devices as they would on a desktop. It’s not just about making the site responsive—it’s about creating an intuitive, fast, and easy to navigate experience. This includes features like mobile-specific payment options, mobile check-in for airlines It's hotels, It's easy access to customers support.
3. Integration of Blockchain for Secure Transactions
Blockchain technology is making waves across various industries, and the travel sector is no exception. Blockchain based travel portals offer a significant advantage when it comes to security It's transparency. Blockchain’s ability to provide secure, tamper proof record makes it ideal for transactions involving bookings, payment, It's loyalty program.
By integrating blockchain, travel businesses can ensure secure It's fast transactions, protect customer data, It's reduce fraud. Blockchain also facilitates easier It's more transparent loyalty program management. Travelers can accumulate rewards points across various service providers, all within the same blockchain framework, creating as a more cohesive It's rewarding experience.
4. Enhanced Payment Solutions and Digital Wallets
One of the most significant changes in the travel industry has been the shift toward contactless payment. Digital wallets, such as a Apple Pay, Google Wallet, It's cryptocurrency wallets, are now widely accepted in travel portals. These payment solutions offer a faster, more secure, It's convenient way for travelers to complete transactions.
For businesses, adopting multiple payment gateways is essential for attracting global customer. International traveler can face issues with currency exchange It's transaction fees, but by offering localized payment method It's supporting a wide range of digital wallets, businesses can significantly improve customers satisfaction It's retention.
5. Voice Search and Virtual Assistants
Voice search is one of the fastest growing trends in the tech world, and the travel industry is no exception. Voice search optimization is becoming an essential part of travel portal development. With the rise of virtual assistants like Amazon’s Alexa, Google Assistant, It's Apple’s Siri, travelers are increasingly using voice command to search for flights, hotels, It's destinations.
For businesses, this means optimizing travel portals for voice search. Voice-friendly portal with natural language processing capabilities can provide users with more accurate results It's make booking processes quicker It's easier. Additionally, integrating virtual assistants into portals can enhance customers service by answering common queries It's assisting with bookings.
6. Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) Experiences
(AR) and (VR) technologies are transforming the way travelers experience destinations and plan their trips. Intensified Reality allows traveler to view destinations, hotel, or local attractions in real time through their mobile devices. For example, an AR feature in a travel portal could allow user to take a virtual tour of a hotel room or explore a city’s landmarks in 3D.
Virtual Reality, on the other hand, can transport users to a destination before they even book their trip, providing immersive previews of their potential vacation. Integrating (AR) It's (VR) into travel portal not only elevates the user experience but also drives engagement by offering something truly unique.
7. Customizable and Personalized Travel Packages
Personalization is key to standing out in the competitive travel industry. Travelers today expect customizable travel packages that cater to their unique need and preferences. From flight choices to hotel rooms, activities, It's local experiences, organization allows businesses to create tailored experiences that resonate with their customer.
Advanced travel portal use customer data to offer customized deal, travel itineraries, It's destination recommendations. By analyzing past booking behaviors It's preferences, businesses can deliver highly relevant options, thus increasing the likelihood of conversion. Offering dynamic packaging allows users to mix and match services based on their preferences, creating a more flexible It's customized booking experience.
8. Sustainability and Eco-Friendly Travel Options
As a coincidental concerns continue to rise, more travelers are becoming mindful of their carbon footprint. Sustainable travel has become a major trend in the tourism industry, It's businesses are responding by incorporating Eco-friendly options into their travel portal. Whether it’s booking Eco-conscious accommodations, flights with lower carbon emissions, or supporting local sustainable experiences, travelers are now seeking out environmentally responsible options.
Travel portals that emphasize sustainability and provide clear, detailed information about eco-friendly options are likely to attract a growing segment of conscientious travelers. Businesses can also promote their commitment to sustainability by partnering with Eco-friendly service providers and offering travelers the ability to offset their carbon emissions.
9. Integration with Social Media and User-Generated Content
Social media plays a pivotal role in travel decision making. More than ever, travelers are relying on user generated content (UGC) like reviews, photos, and videos from social platforms to guide their choices. Integrating (UGC) into travel portals allows businesses to tap into this social proof It's build trust with potential customer.
For instance, allowing users to share their experiences via social media or review platforms can provide valuable insights for other travelers. Additionally, incorporating social sharing features within the portals itself can encourage users to engage with your brand It's share their travel experiences, thereby driving more traffic to the portal.
10. API Integrations and Multi-Channel Distribution
As the travel landscape becomes more fragmented, travel businesses must offer a consistent experience across multiple channels. API integrations are key to ensuring that travel portals can access real-time data and distribute it across different platforms. APIs allow travel portal to integrate with global distribution system (GDS), airlines, hotels, car rental services, It's other travel-related services seamlessly.
By offering multi-channel distribution, business can maximize their reach, whether through desktop websites, mobile app, or third party platform like OTAs (Online Travel Agents). This integration also ensures real-time availability update It's better inventory management.
Source & Published by: https://www.namantechnolab.com/
In Japanese, brown is called 茶色 "chairo". This means "the color of tea.
However, the most common tea in Japan is green tea, and when Japanese people think of tea, they think of green.
For example, Japanese people use matcha green tea in various sweets, and the package design of many such products is based on the color green.
However, 茶色 "chairo," meaning the color of tea, is brown.
Kanji characters are useful ideographs, but often there is a disconnect between the literal meaning and the practical meaning, leading to confusion.
